Managing Harlequin Syndrome in VA-ECMO - do not forget the right ventricle

Ultrasound vector flow imaging during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a thoracic aorta model

In veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) treatment, the mixing zone is a key hemodynamic factor that determines the efficacy of the treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of a novel ultrasound technique called vector flow imaging (VFI) for visualizing complex flow patterns in an aorta phantom under VA-ECMO settings. VFI experiments were performed to image aortic hemodynamics under VA-ECMO treatment simulated in an anthropomorphic thoracic aorta phantom using a pulsatile pump (cardiac output: 2.7 L/min) and an ECMO pump with two different flow rates, 0.35 L/min and 1.0 L/min. The cardiac cycle of hemodynamics in the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta was visualized, and the spatio-temporal dynamics of flow vectors were analyzed. VFI successfully visualized dynamic flow patterns in the aorta phantom. When the flow rate of the ECMO pump increased, ECMO flow was more dominant than cardiac output in the diastole phase, and the speed of cardiac output was suppressed in the systole phase. Vortex flow patterns were also detected in the ascending aorta and the arch under both ECMO flow rate conditions. The VFI technique may provide new insights into aortic hemodynamics and facilitates effective and safe VA-ECMO treatment.

Selective brain perfusion improves the neurological outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a rat model

BACKGROUND

The major concern in patients who have suffered from cardiac arrest (CA) and undergone successful extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is poor neurological outcomes. In this study, we aimed to introduce a rat model of selective brain perfusion (SBP) during E-CPR to improve the neurological outcome after CA.

METHODS

The rats underwent 7 min of untreated asphyxial CA and then were resuscitated with E-CPR for 30 min. The right external jugular vein and right femoral artery were separately cannulated to the E-CPR outflow and inflow. The right common carotid artery was cannulated from the proximal to the distal side for SBP. Subsequently, rats were removed from E-CPR, wounds were closed, and 90 min of intensive care were provided. Neurological deficit scores were tested after 4 h of recovery when the rats were mechanical ventilation-free. S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were detected through immunohistochemistry (IHC) of brain tissue.

RESULTS

The rats that received SBP while resuscitated by E-CPR showed markedly better neurological performances after 4-h recovery than those resuscitated by E-CPR only. The IHC staining of GFAP and S100B in the hippocampus was low in the rats receiving SBP during E-CPR, but only GFAP showed significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a novel and reproducible rat model of SBP while resuscitated by E-CPR to ameliorate the neurological performances after CA. This achievement might have opportunities for studying how to improve the neurological outcome in the clinical condition.

Femoro-axillary versus femoro-femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock: A monocentric retrospective study

RATIONALE

For veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the femoral artery is the preferred cannulation site (femoro-femoral: Vf-Af). This results in retrograde aortic flow, which increases the left ventricular afterload and can lead to severe pulmonary edema and thrombosis of the cardiac chambers. Right axillary artery cannulation (femoral-axillary: Vf-Aa) provides partial anterograde aortic flow, which may prevent some complications. This study aimed to compare the 90-day mortality and complication rates between VF-AA and VF-AF.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with cardiogenic shock who received peripheral VA-ECMO between 2013 and 2019 at our institution were retrospectively included. The exclusion criteria were refractory cardiac arrest, multiple VA-ECMO implantations due to vascular access changes, weaning failure, or ICU readmission. A statistical approach using inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the effect of the cannulation site on the outcomes. The primary endpoint was the 90-day mortality. The secondary endpoints were vascular access complications, stroke, and other complications related to retrograde blood flow. Outcomes were estimated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

VA-ECMO was performed on 534 patients. Patients with refractory cardiac arrest (n = 77 (14%)) and those supported by multiple VA-ECMO (n = 92, (17%)) were excluded. Out of the 333 patients studied (n = 209 Vf-Aa; n = 124 VF-AF), the main indications for VA-ECMO implantation were post-cardiotomy (33%, n = 109), dilated cardiomyopathy (20%, n = 66), post-cardiac transplantation (15%, n = 50), acute myocardial infarction (14%, n = 46) and other etiologies (18%, n = 62). The median SOFA score was 9 [7-11], and the crude 90-day mortality rate was 53% (n = 175). After IPTW, the 90-day mortality was similar in the Vf-Aa and VF-AF groups (54% vs 58%, IPTW-OR = 0.84 [0.54-1.29]). Axillary artery cannulation was associated with significantly fewer local infections (OR = 0.21, 95% CI:0.09-0.51), limb ischemia (OR = 0.37, 95% CI:0.17-0.84), bowel ischemia (OR = 0.16, 95% CI:0.05-0.51) and pulmonary edema (OR = 0.52, 95% CI:0.29-0.92) episodes, but with a higher rate of stroke (OR = 2.87, 95% CI:1.08-7.62) than femoral artery cannulation.

CONCLUSION

Compared to VF-AF, axillary cannulation was associated with similar 90-day mortality rates. The high rate of stroke associated with axillary artery cannulation requires further investigation.

Comparison of Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation and Premembranous Venous Oxygen Saturation in Patients on Peripheral Venous-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

In patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) premembranous venous oxygen saturation (Spm-vO2) is continuously displayed on the ECMO console. However, the concordance between Spm-vO2 and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) remains largely unexplored. Our single-center retrospective study included adult patients who had paired SvO2 and Spm-vO2 readings within 15 minutes of each other, on peripherally cannulated Vf ivc-A ECMO and a pulmonary artery using catheter (PAC). The 82 pairs of observations showed a mean difference of 11.37% (95% limits of agreement -6.0 to 28.74, p < 0.001) between Spm-vO2 and SvO2. Although the two values correlated with each other (r = 0.51, p < 0.01), the difference between the paired measurements was larger at lower values of SvO2 (3.72 ± 6.38% when SvO2 >80%, 11.79±7.46% when SvO2 between 60% and 80%, and 18.81±12.09% when SvO2 <60%). The equation SvO2 = 1.2* Spm-vO2 - 28.03 was obtained by Passing Bablok regression. Cardiac index calculated by Spm-vO2 and SvO2 differed by 0.8L/minute/m2 (95% limits of agreement -0.52 to 2.17, p < 0.001). In peripheral VA-ECMO, Spm-vO2 is consistently higher than SvO2, with more discordance at lower saturation levels. Using Spm-vO2 to estimate cardiac output using Fick method yields inaccurate results.

Impact of hyperoxia on the gut during critical illnesses

Molecular oxygen is typically delivered to patients via oxygen inhalation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), potentially resulting in systemic hyperoxia from liberal oxygen inhalation or localized hyperoxia in the lower body from peripheral venoarterial (VA) ECMO. Consequently, this exposes the gastrointestinal tract to excessive oxygen levels. Hyperoxia can trigger organ damage due to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species and is associated with increased mortality. The gut and gut microbiome play pivotal roles in critical illnesses and even small variations in oxygen levels can have a dramatic influence on the physiology and ecology of gut microbes. Here, we reviewed the emerging preclinical evidence which highlights how excessive inhaled oxygen can provoke diffuse villous damage, barrier dysfunction in the gut, and gut dysbiosis. The hallmark of this dysbiosis includes the expansion of oxygen-tolerant pathogens (e.g., Enterobacteriaceae) and the depletion of beneficial oxygen-intolerant microbes (e.g., Muribaculaceae). Furthermore, we discussed potential impact of oxygen on the gut in various underlying critical illnesses involving inspiratory oxygen and peripheral VA-ECMO. Currently, the available findings in this area are somewhat controversial, and a consensus has not yet to be reached. It appears that targeting near-physiological oxygenation levels may offer a means to avoid hyperoxia-induced gut injury and hypoxia-induced mesenteric ischemia. However, the optimal oxygenation target may vary depending on special clinical conditions, including acute hypoxia in adults and neonates, as well as particular patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery or VA-ECMO support. Last, we outlined the current challenges and the need for future studies in this area. Insights into this vital ongoing research can assist clinicians in optimizing oxygenation for critically ill patients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock: Why, how, when, and for whom

Sepsis and septic shock remain the leading causes of death in intensive care units. Some patients with sepsis fail to respond to routine treatment and rapidly progress to refractory respiratory and circulatory failure, necessitating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, the role of ECMO in adult patients with sepsis has not been fully established. According to existing studies, ECMO may be a viable salvage therapy in carefully selected adult patients with sepsis. The choice of venovenous, venoarterial, or hybrid ECMO modes is primarily determined by the patient's oxygenation and hemodynamics (distributive shock with preserved cardiac output, septic cardiomyopathy (left, right, or biventricular heart failure), or right ventricular failure caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome). Veno-venous ECMO can be used in patients with sepsis and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome when conventional mechanical ventilation fails, and early application of veno-arterial ECMO in patients with sepsis-induced refractory cardiogenic shock may be critical in improving their chances of survival. When ECMO is indicated, the choice of an appropriate mode and determination of the optimal timing of initiation and weaning are critical, particularly in an experienced ECMO center. Furthermore, some special issues, such as ECMO flow, anticoagulation, and antibiotic therapy, should be noted during the management of ECMO support.

Trends on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Associated With Acute Brain Injury in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

We aimed to determine the association between cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ) trends from cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (cNIRS) and acute brain injury (ABI) in adult venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) patients. ABI was defined as intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, hypoxic ischemic brain injury, or brain death during ECMO. rSO 2 values were collected from left and right cerebral oximetry sensors every hour from ECMO cannulation. Cerebral desaturation was defined as consecutive hours of rSO 2 < 40%. rSO 2 asymmetry was determined by (a) averaging left/right rSO 2 difference over the entire ECMO run; (b) consecutive hours of rSO 2 asymmetry. Sixty-nine VA-ECMO patients (mean age 56 years, 65% male) underwent cNIRS. Eighteen (26%) experienced ABI. When the mean rSO 2 asymmetry was >8% there was significantly increased odds of ABI (aOR = 39.4; 95% CI = 4.1-381.4). Concurrent rSO 2 < 40% and rSO 2 asymmetry >10% for >10 consecutive hours (asymmetric desaturation) was also significantly associated with ABI (aOR = 5.2; 95% CI = 1.2-22.2), but neither criterion alone were. Mean rSO 2 asymmetry>8% exhibited 39% sensitivity and 98% specificity for detecting ABI, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, and asymmetric desaturation had 33% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with an AUC of 0.72. These trends on NIRS monitoring may help detect ABI in VA-ECMO patients.

Acute coronary syndrome associated cardiogenic shock in the catheterization laboratory: peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator management and recommendations

Cardiogenic shock (CS) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a critical disease with high mortality rates requiring complex treatment to maximize patient survival chances. Emergent coronary revascularization along with circulatory support are keys to saving lives. Mechanical circulatory support may be instigated in severe, yet still reversible instances. Of these, the peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (pVA-ECMO) is the most widely used system for both circulatory and respiratory support. The aim of our work is to provide a review of our current understanding of the pVA-ECMO when used in the catheterization laboratory in a CS ACS setting. We detail the workings of a Shock Team: pVA-ECMO specifics, circumstances, and timing of implantations and discuss possible complications. We place emphasis on how to select the appropriate patients for potential pVA-ECMO support and what characteristics and parameters need to be assessed. A detailed, stepwise implantation algorithm indicating crucial steps is also featured for practitioners in the catheter laboratory. To provide an overall aspect of pVA-ECMO use in CS ACS we further gave pointers including relevant human resource, infrastructure, and consumables management to build an effective Shock Team to treat CS ACS via the pVA-ECMO method.

Interactions between extracorporeal support and the cardiopulmonary system

This review describes the intricate physiological interactions involved in the application of extracorporeal therapy, with specific focus on cardiopulmonary relationships. Extracorporeal therapy significantly influences cardiovascular and pulmonary physiology, highlighting the necessity for clinicians to understand these interactions for improved patient care. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (veno-arterial ECMO) unloads the right ventricle and increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, potentially exacerbating LV failure and pulmonary edema. Veno-venous (VV) ECMO presents different challenges, where optimal device and ventilator settings remain unknown. Influences on right heart function and native gas exchange as well as end-expiratory lung volumes are important concepts that should be incorporated into daily practice. Future studies should not be limited to large clinical trials focused on mortality but rather address physiological questions to advance the understanding of extracorporeal therapies. This includes exploring optimal device and ventilator settings in VV ECMO, standardizing cardiopulmonary function monitoring strategies, and developing better strategies for device management throughout their use. In this regard, small human or animal studies and computational physiological modeling may contribute valuable insights into optimizing the management of extracorporeal therapies.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock is a critical condition of low cardiac output resulting in insufficient systemic perfusion and end-organ dysfunction. Though significant advances have been achieved in reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support, cardiogenic shock continues to be a life-threatening condition associated with a high rate of complications and excessively high patient mortality, reported to be between 35% and 50%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can provide full cardiopulmonary support, has been increasingly used in the last two decades, and can be used to restore systemic end-organ hypoperfusion. However, a paucity of randomized controlled trials in combination with high complication and mortality rates suggest the need for more research to better define its efficacy, safety, and optimal patient selection. In this review, we provide an updated review on VA-ECMO, with an emphasis on its application in cardiogenic shock, including indications and contraindications, expected hemodynamic and echocardiographic findings, recommendations for weaning, complications, and outcomes. Furthermore, specific emphasis will be devoted to the two published randomized controlled trials recently presented in this setting.

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) encompasses a wide array of invasive devices, which provide short-term hemodynamic support for multiple clinical indications. Although initially developed for the management of cardiogenic shock, indications for MCS have expanded to include prophylactic insertion prior to high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment of acute circulatory failure following cardiac surgery, and bridging of end-stage heart failure patients to more definitive therapies, such as left ventricular assist devices and cardiac transplantation. A wide variety of devices are available to provide left ventricular, right ventricular, or biventricular support. The choice of a temporary MCS device requires consideration of the clinical scenario, patient characteristics, institution protocols, and provider familiarity and training. In this review, the most common forms of left, right, and biventricular temporary MCS are discussed, along with their indications, contraindications, complications, cannulations, hemodynamic effects, and available clinical data.

Differential hypoxemia and the clinical significance of venous drainage position during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Differential hypoxemia (DH) has been recognized as a clinical problem during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) although its features and consequences have not been fully elucidated.

This single center retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients manifesting DH as well as the impact of repositioning the drainage point from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the superior vena cava to alleviate DH.

All patients (>15 years) commenced on VA ECMO at our center between 2009 and 2020 were screened. Of 472 eligible patients seven were identified with severe DH. All patients had the drainage cannula tip in the IVC or at the junction between the IVC and right atrium.

The mean peripheral capillary saturation increased from 54 (±6.6) to 86 (±6.6) %, (p = <0.001) after repositioning of the cannula. Pre-oxygenator saturation increased from 62 (±8.9) % prior to adjustment to 74 (±3.7) %, (p = 0.016) after repositioning. Plasma lactate tended to decrease within 24 h after adjustment. Five patients (71%) survived ECMO treatment, to discharge from hospital, and were alive at 1-year follow-up.

Although DH has been described in several studies, the condition has not been investigated in a clinical setting comparing the effect on upper body saturation before and after repositioning of the drainage cannula. This study shows that moving the drainage zone into the upper part of the body has a marked positive effect on upper body saturation in patients with DH.

Venoarterial Versus Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as a bridge to lung transplantation with acceptable outcomes. We hypothesized that VA ECMO, as part of a multidisciplinary ECMO program, yields similar outcomes as VV ECMO as a bridge in lung transplantation.

METHODS

Records of all patients who had undergone ECMO with the intention to bridge to lung transplantation at University of California Los Angeles from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2020 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, long-term survival, and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) were assessed.

RESULTS

During this interval, 58 patients were placed on ECMO with the intention to bridge to lung transplantation: 27 on VV ECMO, and 31 on VA ECMO with a median duration of 7 and 17 days of support, respectively(p=0.01). Successful bridge to lung transplantation occurred in 21(78%) VV and 26(84%) VA patients. Incidence of primary graft dysfunction III(PGD III) at 72 hours in the VV and the VA cohorts were 0% and 4%, respectively(p=0.99). In-hospital and 90-day survival of the VV and VA groups were 100% and 96%, respectively(p=0.99). Three-year survival of the two groups were not significantly different from a contemporary cohort of lung transplant recipients not bridged with ECMO.

CONCLUSIONS

VA and VV ECMO can both be used as a bridge to lung transplantation with high success, with short and medium-term survival similar to non-bridged lung transplant recipients. Both modes should be considered effective at bridging select candidates to lung transplantation.