Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effect of intra-aortic balloon pump on survival and neurological outcome in patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly used to treat refractory cardiac arrest, although with variable results in survival and neurological outcomes. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) showed mixed effects on survival in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Furthermore, the impact of IABP on survival and neurological outcomes in ECPR recipients has yet to be fully investigated.

METHODS

We searched relevant databases for studies concerning ECPR recipients and intra-aortic balloon pump with information on survival and neurological outcomes. The inverse variance method (95 % confidence intervals) was used to determine the odds ratios of outcomes. We decided on a priori use of the random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment.

RESULTS

We included in our analysis nine cohort studies dealing with a total of 4994 patients. The association of IABP with ECPR was associated with a survival benefit compared to ECPR alone: 1029/3124 (32.9 %) patients survived in the ECPR+IABP group versus 379/1870 (20.2 %) in the ECPR group, OR 1.94, 95 % CI [1.36 to 2.77]. Survival with good neurological outcome was analyzed in 4 studies for 4018 patients. The association of ECPR and IABP was associated with a not significant advantage in survival with favorable neurological outcome compared with ECPR alone: 555/2687 (20.7 %) patients with good neurological outcome in the group of ECPR+IABP versus 149/1331 (11.2 %) patients in the group of ECPR, OR 1.33, 95 % CI [0.61 to 2.92].

CONCLUSIONS

The association of IABP and ECPR significantly increases survival rates compared to ECPR alone. Nevertheless, the impact on favorable neurological outcomes remains uncertain.

Unloading the Left Ventricle in Venoarterial ECMO: In Whom, When, and How?

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides cardiorespiratory support to patients in cardiogenic shock. This comes at the cost of increased left ventricle (LV) afterload that can be partly ascribed to retrograde aortic flow, causing LV distension, and leads to complications including cardiac thrombi, arrhythmias, and pulmonary edema. LV unloading can be achieved by using an additional circulatory support device to mitigate the adverse effects of mechanical overload that may increase the likelihood of myocardial recovery. Observational data suggest that these strategies may improve outcomes, but in whom, when, and how LV unloading should be employed is unclear; all techniques require balancing presumed benefits against known risks of device-related complications. This review summarizes the current evidence related to LV unloading with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Impact of Initial Operative Urgency on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Treated with ECMO Due to Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock

The outcomes of patients with PCS and following ECMO therapy are associated with several preoperative risk factors. Our aim was to compare clinical presentation, ECMO-related data and in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with ECMO due to PCS after cardiac surgery, in regard to elective or emergent cardiac surgery procedures. Between April 2006 and October 2016, 164 consecutive patients that received VA-ECMO therapy due to PCS were identified and included in this retrospective cohort study. The patients were divided into groups based on the urgency of the initial procedures performed: elective group (ELG; n = 95) and an emergency group (EMG; n = 69). To compare the unequal patient groups, a propensity score-based matching (PSM) was applied (ELG, n = 56 vs. EMG, n = 56). The EMG primarily received ECMO intraoperatively (p ≤ 0.001). In contrast, the ELG were needed ECMO support more frequently postoperatively (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality accounted for 71% (n = 40) in the ELG and 76% (n = 43) in the EMG (p = 0.518). Outcome data showed no major differences in the (abdominal ischemia (p = 0.371); septic shock (p = 0.393): rhythm disturbances (p = 0.575); emergency re-thoracotomy (p = 0.418)) between the groups. The urgency of the initial procedures performed is secondary in patients suffering PCS and following ECMO. In this regard, PCS itself seems to trigger outcomes in cardiac surgery ECMO patients substantially.