Long-Term Outcomes of Endovenous Laser Ablation, n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021;
10:865-871. [PMID:
34688972 DOI:
10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.10.009]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
This study aims to evaluate the long-term results regarding the effectiveness and reliability of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), endovenous n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) application and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) methods in the management of Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).
METHODS
Charts of patients treated with EVLA, NBCA and RFA methods for CVI between January 1st, 2014 and January 1st, 2017, were reviewed. Records were made of personal information including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) and admission symptoms. Great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter, score of CEAP (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy and Pathophysiology) classification, and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) were also noted. All patients were followed up with physical examination and CDUS at the first week, and 6th and 12th months after the procedures. After 12th month, follow-ups were annual.
RESULTS
Enrolled in the study were a total of 232 patients who underwent lower limb CVI procedures (77 patients with EVLA, 73 patients with NBCA and 82 patients with RFA). The mean follow-up time was 67.5±4.7 months. Time of procedure was significantly shorter in patients treated with NBCA (13.5 minutes) in comparison of patients treated with EVLA (31.7 minutes) and RFA (27.9 minutes) (p= 0.001). Pain score was highest in EVLA group (p= 0.001). Significantly higher complication rates and longer time to return daily activity was recorded in those undergoing EVLA procedure (p= 0.001). Post hoc analysis revealed comparable occlusion success among groups on post-operative first day, and at 6th month, first year and second year. However, significantly better success of occlusion rates were found for RFA in comparison of EVLA in third and fifth-years follow-ups (p= 0.024 and p= 0.011). The success of NBCA and RFA was similar in third and fifth-years follow-ups (p= 0.123 vs p= 0.330) CONCLUSION: Outcomes showed similar levels of early postoperative occlusion success among all three CVI treatment techniques, but RFA has a significantly higher success rate over EVLA in the third and fifth-year follow-ups. Additionally, NBCA and RFA procedures achieved comparable long-term success. EVLA was associated with significantly higher complication rates and pain scores, and longer time to return daily activities, while NBCA procedure had a significantly shorter operation time than the other procedures.
Collapse