Is it Necessary to Strip the Long Saphenous Vein?

Two hundred patients with primary, untreated varicose veins were randomly allocated to have their long saphenous veins stripped or to undergo high saphenous ligation alone. The patients were regularly reviewed and, at 3 years follow up, there was no significant difference in the results obtained from the two groups of patients.

Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins

BACKGROUND

Injection sclerotherapy is widely used for superficial varicose veins. The treatment aims to obliterate the lumen of varicose veins or thread veins. There is limited evidence regarding its efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether sclerotherapy is effective in improving symptoms and cosmetic appearance and has an acceptable complication rate; to define rates of symptomatic or cosmetic varicose vein recurrence following sclerotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group trials register (April 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE and EMBASE (both inception to April 2006) and reference lists of articles. Manufacturers of sclerosants were contacted for additional trial information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of injection sclerotherapy versus graduated compression stockings (GCS) or 'observation', or comparing different sclerosants, doses, formulations and post-compression bandaging techniques on people with symptomatic and/or cosmetic varicose veins or thread veins were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by authors and Review Group Co-ordinators independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included. One study comparing sclerotherapy to GCS in pregnancy found that sclerotherapy improved symptoms and cosmetic appearance. Three studies comparing sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STD) to alternative sclerosants found no significant differences in outcome or complication rates; another study found that sclerotherapy with STD led to improved cosmetic appearance compared with polidocanol, although there was no difference in symptoms. Sclerosant plus local anaesthetic reduced the pain from injection (one study) but had no other effects. Two studies compared foam- to conventional sclerotherapy; one found no difference in failure rate or recurrent varicose veins; a second showed short-term benefit from foam in terms of elimination of venous reflux. The recanalisation rate was no different between the two treatments. One study comparing Molefoam and Sorbo pad pressure dressings found no difference in erythema or successful sclerosis. The degree and duration of elastic compression had no significant effect on varicose vein recurrence rates, cosmetic appearance or symptomatic improvement.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs suggests that the choice of sclerosant, dose, formulation (foam versus liquid), local pressure dressing, degree and length of compression have no significant effect on the efficacy of sclerotherapy for varicose veins. The evidence supports the current place of sclerotherapy in modern clinical practice, which is usually limited to treatment of recurrent varicose veins following surgery and thread veins. Surgery versus sclerotherapy is the subject of a further Cochrane Review.

Sklerosierungstherapie der Varikose

Sclerotherapy is a standard treatment for intradermal varicose veins and branch varicosities. In the treatment of insufficient saphenous veins, crossectomy and stripping used to be the methods of choice. In the last few years good results have also been reported for endovenous methods such as endovenous laser and radio frequency treatment. Sclerotherapy is more effective and even appropriate for larger saphenous veins when the sclerosing liquid is replaced by a foam agent. This cost-effective approach can be done on an outpatient basis without additional anesthesia. Prospective randomized studies are need to confirm the effectiveness.

Efficacy of sclerotherapy in varicose veins-- prospective, blinded, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of sclerotherapy for varicose veins in a randomized blinded study.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with varicose veins (C(2-4), E(P), A(SP), P(R)) were included. Fourteen subjects received polidocanol (Aethoxysklerol) and 11 patients received normal saline injections. Compression was applied for 1 week. One, 4, and 12 weeks later controls were performed using duplex ultrasonography. The quotient of venous by arterial volume flow was used as quantitative hemodynamic pattern. Patients and the examiner were unaware of which liquid had been injected.

RESULTS

In comparison to group 2, 76.8% of the veins treated with polidocanol were completely occluded (p<0.0001). In group 1 the venoarterial flow index decreased from 1.45+/-0.66 to 1.06+/-0.2 (p=0.05). In 11 occluded veins of 14 (group 1), the venoarterial flow index decreased from 1.5+/-0.07 to 0.98+/-0.12 (p<0.05), which is a level found in competent veins. In group 2, the venoarterial flow index remained stable increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection sclerotherapy using polidocanol (Aethoxysklerol) is efficient to obliterate varicose veins and to improve venous hemodynamics.

Guidelines for sclerotherapy of varicose veins (ICD 10: I83.0, I83.1, I83.2, and I83.9)

BACKGROUND

Sclerotherapy is the targeted elimination of intracutaneous, subcutaneous, and/or transfascial varicose veins (perforating veins) as well as the sclerosation of subfascial varicose vessels in the case of venous malformation by the injection of a sclerosant. With duplex-guide sclerotherapy and foam sclerotherapy, modified methods came into use.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to create a guideline, based on the available publications and on the European Consensus Document on foam sclerotherapy from April 2003.

METHODS

This guideline was drafted on behalf of the German Society of Phlebology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phlebologie) and adopted by the committee and scientific advisory board of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phlebologie on June 15, 2001, and amended on December 5, 2003. The guideline considers the present state of knowledge as reflected in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline represents the recent state of the art of sclerotherapy of varicose veins in Germany including foam sclerotherapy.

Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins

BACKGROUND

Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins has been used widely since 1963, following popularisation of the technique by Fegan. The treatment aims to obliterate the lumen of varicose veins or thread veins, however, there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether sclerotherapy is effective in terms of symptomatic improvement and cosmetic appearance; has an acceptable complication rate; and to define rates of symptomatic or cosmetic varicose vein recurrence following sclerotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Publications describing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins (excluding comparisons with surgery) were sought through EMBASE and MEDLINE (from inception to March 2001) and hand-searching relevant journals, using the search strategy described by the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Review Group. Bibliographies of papers identified were examined for further RCTs. Manufacturers of sclerosants were contacted for further trial information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of injection sclerotherapy versus graduated compression stockings or 'observation', or comparing different sclerosants, doses and post-compression bandaging techniques on patients with symptomatic and/or cosmetic varicose veins or thread veins were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Ten studies were included in the analysis. These compared: sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STD) versus an alternative sclerosant; sclerosant with or without local anaesthetic; application of Molefoam versus Sorbo pads to injection sites; elastic compression bandaging versus conventional bandaging; and short-term bandaging versus standard bandaging. Data were abstracted by both authors.

MAIN RESULTS

No RCTs compared sclerotherapy to graduated compression stockings or other non-surgical treatments. Two studies compared STD to alternative sclerosants and found no significant differences in outcome or complication rates. Adding local anaesthetic to sclerosant reduced the pain from injection (one study) but had no other effects. Comparison of Molefoam and Sorbo pad pressure dressings found no difference in outcome for erythema (redness) or successful sclerosis. The degree and duration of elastic compression had no significant effect on varicose vein recurrence rates, cosmetic appearance or symptomatic improvement. Increased compression prevented slipping of dressings but caused increased discomfort, as did increasing duration of compression.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs suggests that type of sclerosant, local pressure dressing, degree and length of compression have no significant effect on the efficacy of sclerotherapy for varicose veins. This supports the current place of sclerotherapy in modern clinical practice, which is usually limited to treatment of recurrent varicose veins following surgery, and thread veins. A comparison of surgery versus sclerotherapy would be valuable.