Measurement Properties of Clinical Instruments for Assessing Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the measurement properties of clinical instruments used to assess manual wheelchair mobility in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DATA SOURCES

This systematic review was conducted according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was conducted up to December 2021 on MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Biblioteca Regional de Medicina, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health databases without time restriction.

STUDY SELECTION

Peer-reviewed original research articles that examined any clinical wheelchair mobility and/or skill assessment instrument among adults with SCI and reported data on at least one measurement property or described the development procedure were evaluated independently by two reviewers.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were independently extracted according to Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology. Measurement property results from each study were independently rated by two reviewers as sufficient, insufficient, indeterminate, or inconsistent. The evidence for each measurement property was rated as high, moderate, low, or very low (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Recommendations for highly-rated instruments were performed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-nine studies with 21 instruments were identified. The methodological quality of studies ranged from insufficient to sufficient, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to high. Six instruments reported content validity. Reliability and construct validity were the most studied measurement properties. Structural validity and invariance for cross-cultural measurement were not reported. The highly rated instruments were the Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Although numerous instruments for assessing wheelchair mobility and/or skills among individuals with SCI were identified, not many measurement properties have been sufficiently established. The Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire show the current best potential to be recommended for clinical and research use. Further studies are needed to strengthen or change these recommendations.

[Psychometric properties of observational instruments to evaluate wheelchair skills in persons with a spinal cord injury: A systematic review]

A total of 60% of people with a spinal cord injury are completely dependent on a wheelchair. There is a wide variety of instruments that assess wheelchair skills, but they are not specific for this population. OBJECTIVE: To identify, assess, compare and summarize the psychometric properties of instruments that assess wheelchair skills in persons with a spinal cord injury. A systematic review was conducted and observational instruments were included that assessed wheelchair skills in persons with spinal cord injury. Eleven articles were identified that evaluated eight instruments. Most of them reported activities according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Reliability was the most frequently evaluated psychometric property. The Queensland Evaluation of Wheelchair Skills and the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit had the best degrees of confidence in the evidence, and their application could guide the selection of pertinent therapeutic strategies. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020161430.

Rehabilitation: mobility, exercise & sports; a critical position stand on current and future research perspectives

BACKGROUND

Human movement, rehabilitation, and allied sciences have embraced their ambitions within the cycle of "RehabMove" congresses over the past 30 years. This combination of disciplines and collaborations in the Netherlands has tried to provide answers to questions in the fields of rehabilitation and adapted sports, while simultaneously generating new questions and challenges. These research questions help us to further deepen our understanding of (impaired) human movement and functioning, with and without supportive technologies, and stress the importance of continued multidisciplinary (inter)national collaboration.

METHODS

This position stand provides answers that were conceived by the authors in a creative process underlining the preparation of the 6th RehabMove Congress.

RESULTS

The take-home message of the RehabMove2018 Congress is a plea for continued multidisciplinary research in the fields of rehabilitation and adapted sports. This should be aimed at more individualized notions of human functioning, practice, and training, but also of performance, improved supportive technology, and appropriate "human and technology asset management" at both individual and organization levels and over the lifespan.

CONCLUSIONS

With this, we anticipate to support the development of rehabilitation sciences and technology and to stimulate the use of rehabilitation notions in general health care. We also hope to help ensure a stronger embodiment of preventive and lifestyle medicine in rehabilitation practice. Indeed, general health care and rehabilitation practice require a healthy and active lifestyle management and research agenda in the context of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONContinued multidisciplinary (international) collaboration will stimulate the development of rehabilitation and human movement sciences.Notions from "human and technology asset management and ergonomics" are fundamental to rehabilitation practice and research.The rehabilitation concept will further merge into general health care and the quality there-off.

Reliability and normative values of the Wheelchair Propulsion Test: A preliminary investigation

BACKGROUND

Normative data for the equivalent of gait speed via the Wheelchair Propulsion Test (WPT) do not exist for wheelchair users.

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of the current study were to: 1) determine the reliability of the WPT, 2) propose and compare normative values for the WPT for young adult males and females utilizing three different propulsion techniques, and 3) compare how different wheelchair types affect performance on the WPT.

METHODS

50 young adults (25 of each sex) performed the WPT using three different propulsion techniques in three different types of wheelchairs. Participants were asked to propel a wheelchair over 10 m at a comfortable speed. Time and number of pushes were recorded for three trials for each propulsion technique in each type of wheelchair.

RESULTS

All of the ICC(2,2) values were >0.83 for speed and number of pushes. Normative values for speed, number of pushes, push frequency and effectiveness categorized by propulsion technique, sex and wheelchair type were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary normative values have been established for young adults performing the WPT. This study highlights the need to maintain consistency of the wheelchair type and propulsion technique between trials in order for the WPT to be reliable.

Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project

Background: Wheeled mobility is critical for individuals with Spinal Cord Injury or Disease (SCI/D) related paralysis. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines highlighting eight steps in wheelchair service delivery: (1) referral and appointment; (2) assessment; (3) prescription; (4) funding and ordering; (5) product preparation; (6) fitting; (7) user training; and, (8) follow-up maintenance/repairs. This article describes the processes used to develop structure, process and outcome indicators that reflect the WHO guidelines within the Domain of Wheeled Mobility rehabilitation for Canadians. Methods: Wheeled mobility experts within the SCI-High Project Team used the WHO guideline to inform the Construct refinement and development of a Driver diagram. Following seven meetings, the Driver diagram and review of outcome measures and literature synthesis regarding wheelchair service delivery informed indicator selection and group consensus. Results: The structure indicator examines the proportion of SCI/D service providers within a rehabilitation program who have specialized wheelchair training to ensure prescription, preparation, fitting, and maintenance quality. The process indicator evaluates the average number of hours of wheelchair service delivery provided per patient during rehabilitation. The intermediary outcome indicator (rehabilitation discharge), is a target capacity score on the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). The final outcome indicators (at 18 months post rehabilitation admission) are the Life Space Assessment (LSA) and the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale (WheelCon) short form mean scores. Conclusion: Routine implementation of the selected Wheeled Mobility structure, process and outcome indicators should measurably advance care within the Wheeled Mobility Domain for Canadians living with SCI/D by 2020.

Cross-cultural validation of a Brazilian version of the adapted manual wheelchair circuit (AMWC-Brazil)

Purpose: To translate, culturally adapt and validate the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC) into Brazilian-Portuguese. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Sixty-six men (median age of 30.5 years [percentiles 25 and 75: 24.0; 38.3 years]) with traumatic spinal cord injury were consecutively enrolled and divided into two groups: tetraplegia (TP) and paraplegia (PP). The participants performed the AMWC-Brazil and were evaluated by the Spinal Cord Injury Measure version III (SCIM-III). Translation, translation synthesis, back-translation, committee review and construct validity were adopted for the cross-cultural adaptation. Construct validity was performed by testing whether the test scores were significantly correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient) to the subjects' injury level, age, time since injury, body mass index (BMI) and SCIM-III scale. Results: All the AMWC-Brazil's outcomes were significantly correlated with SCIM-III total score and subscales (P ≤ 0.01). However, when the analyses were stratified over injury level, only the TP showed a high correlation between the AMWC-Brazil's outcomes and the SCIM-III. For construct validity, 4 of 5 hypotheses were confirmed. Only BMI was not a significant predictor of the AMWC-Brazil outcomes. Conclusion: The AMWC was successfully translated to the Brazilian-Portuguese (AMWC-Brazil) and presented high and satisfactory construct validity.

Development of a wheelchair mobility skills test for children and adolescents: combining evidence with clinical expertise

Background

Wheelchair mobility skills (WMS) training is regarded by children using a manual wheelchair and their parents as an important factor to improve participation and daily physical activity. Currently, there is no outcome measure available for the evaluation of WMS in children. Several wheelchair mobility outcome measures have been developed for adults, but none of these have been validated in children. Therefore the objective of this study is to develop a WMS outcome measure for children using the current knowledge from literature in combination with the clinical expertise of health care professionals, children and their parents.

Methods

Mixed methods approach. Phase 1: Item identification of WMS items through a systematic review using the ‘COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments’ (COSMIN) recommendations. Phase 2: Item selection and validation of relevant WMS items for children, using a focus group and interviews with children using a manual wheelchair, their parents and health care professionals. Phase 3: Feasibility of the newly developed Utrecht Pediatric Wheelchair Mobility Skills Test (UP-WMST) through pilot testing.

Results

Phase 1: Data analysis and synthesis of nine WMS related outcome measures showed there is no widely used outcome measure with levels of evidence across all measurement properties. However, four outcome measures showed some levels of evidence on reliability and validity for adults. Twenty-two WMS items with the best clinimetric properties were selected for further analysis in phase 2. Phase 2: Fifteen items were deemed as relevant for children, one item needed adaptation and six items were considered not relevant for assessing WMS in children. Phase 3: Two health care professionals administered the UP-WMST in eight children. The instructions of the UP-WMST were clear, but the scoring method of the height difference items needed adaptation. The outdoor items for rolling over soft surface and the side slope item were excluded in the final version of the UP-WMST due to logistic reasons.

Conclusions

The newly developed 15 item UP-WMST is a validated outcome measure which is easy to administer in children using a manual wheelchair. More research regarding reliability, construct validity and responsiveness is warranted before the UP-WMST can be used in practice.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0809-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Selected factors affecting the efficiency of wheelchair mobility in individuals with spinal cord injury

Introduction: Locomotion efficiency levels in individuals with spinal cord injury deal cord injury depend upon the level of spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury aims to prepare them to function in society in the best possible manner. One of the significant tasks of rehabilitation is to develop the skill of moving in a wheelchair, which becomes the only means of locomotion for most people. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of selected factors such as age, sex, time from the occurrence of the injury, the level of spinal cord injury, participation in Active Rehabilitation camps and the level of physical activity on the efficiency of locomotion in a wheelchair in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Material and methods: The study included 55 patients after a complete spinal cord injury (39 males and 16 females using manual wheelchairs), aged 19 to 59. The level of spinal cord injury was assessed on the basis of a subjective classification of ASIA. The efficiency of wheelchair mobility was evaluated using the wheelchair manoeuvring technique test by Tasiemski (evaluation of performance of 14 tasks taking into account architectural barriers).

Results: The majority of respondents (n = 28) obtained medium level of the efficiency, 16 participants scored low, while 11 individuals scored high. The highest score which women obtained was the medium level. It was men only (n = 11) who scored high. There was no statistically significant correlation between the efficiency of wheel-chair mobility and the level of spinal cord injury. It was observed that younger individuals and those practising sport daily achieved the best test results.

Conclusions: Participants’ age affected their locomotion efficiency in a wheelchair. Females demonstrated lower levels of efficiency wheelchair mobility than their male counterparts. Regular physical activity affected the participants’ efficiency of wheeled mobility significantly.

Do Performance-Based Wheelchair Propulsion Tests Detect Changes Among Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Rehabilitation in Quebec?

OBJECTIVE

To quantify and compare the responsiveness and concurrent validity of 3 performance-based manual wheelchair propulsion tests among manual wheelchair users with subacute spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoing inpatient rehabilitation.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental repeated-measures design.

SETTING

Publicly funded comprehensive inpatient SCI rehabilitation program.

PARTICIPANTS

Consenting adult manual wheelchair users with a subacute SCI admitted and discharged from inpatient rehabilitation (N=14).

INTERVENTION

Participants performed 20-m propulsion at both self-selected natural and maximal speeds, the slalom, and the 6-minute propulsion tests at rehabilitation admission and discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time required to complete the performance-based wheelchair propulsion tests. Standardized response means (SRMs) were computed for each performance test and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to explore the associations between performance tests.

RESULTS

The slalom (SRM=1.24), 20-m propulsion at maximum speed (SRM=.99), and 6-minute propulsion tests (SRM=.84) were the most responsive. The slalom and 20-m propulsion at maximum speed were strongly correlated at both admission (r=.93) and discharge (r=.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The slalom and 6-minute propulsion tests best document wheelchair propulsion performance change over the course of inpatient rehabilitation. Adding the 20-m propulsion test performed at maximal speed provides a complementary description of performance change.