1
|
Scott OFT, Bubna M, Boyko E, Hunt C, Kristman VL, Gargaro J, Khodadadi M, Chandra T, Kabir US, Kenrick-Rochon S, Cowle S, Burke MJ, Zabjek KF, Dosaj A, Mushtaque A, Baker AJ, Bayley MT, Tartaglia MC. Author Correction: Characterizing the profiles of patients with acute concussion versus prolonged post-concussion symptoms in Ontario. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4763. [PMID: 38413649 PMCID: PMC10899232 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55261-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia F T Scott
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Emily Boyko
- EPID@Work Research Institute, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Cindy Hunt
- Head Injury Clinic, Department of Trauma and Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Concussion Ontario Network: Neuroinformatics to Enhance Clinical Care and Translation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vicki L Kristman
- EPID@Work Research Institute, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Judith Gargaro
- Neurotrauma Care Pathways Project, KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mozhgan Khodadadi
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tharshini Chandra
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Clinic, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Umme Saika Kabir
- EPID@Work Research Institute, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Shannon Kenrick-Rochon
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Health Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | | | - Matthew J Burke
- Neuropsychiatry Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karl F Zabjek
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Dosaj
- Head Injury Clinic, Department of Trauma and Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Asma Mushtaque
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew J Baker
- Brain Health and Wellness Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Clinic, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Carmela Tartaglia
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wiest MJ, Gargaro J, Bayley MT. What Is the Pathway to the Best Model of Care for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury? Evidence-Based Guidance. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2023; 29:103-111. [PMID: 38174142 PMCID: PMC10759857 DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00059s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Introduction People with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) experience lifelong physical and emotional health impacts, needing specialized care that is complex to navigate. The non-standardized care pathways used by different jurisdictions to address these needs lead to care inequities and poor health outcomes. Purpose To develop an evidence-based integrated tSCI Care Pathway, from time of injury to life in the community. Methods and Analysis Eighty key partners engaged in planning, providing, and receiving tSCI care (1) identified existing guidelines, pathways, and care models; (2) created the tSCI Care Pathway with key elements or building blocks ("the what"), not specific recommendations ("the how") for each care stage (Acute, Rehabilitation, and Community), with elements highlighting the role of primary care and equity considerations on the pathway; (3) identified regional gaps in the tSCI Pathway and prioritized them for implementation; and (4) developed quality indicators. Outcomes The tSCI Pathway was drafted in overarching and detailed formats. For Acute Care, building blocks focused on appropriate assessment, initial management, and transition planning; for Rehabilitation, building blocks focused on access to specialized rehabilitation and assessment and planning of community needs; for Community, building blocks focused on follow-up, mechanisms for re-access, and holistic support for persons and families; and for equity considerations, building blocks focused on those at-risk or requiring complex supports. Team-based primary care and navigation supports were seen as crucial to reduce inequities. Conclusion This is the first comprehensive care pathway for tSCI. The Pathway is grounded in person-centred care, integrated care and services, and up-to-date clinical practice guidelines. The tSCI Care Pathway is flexible to regional realities and individual needs to ensure equitable care for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheus Joner Wiest
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Judith Gargaro
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scott OFT, Bubna M, Boyko E, Hunt C, Kristman VL, Gargaro J, Khodadadi M, Chandra T, Kabir US, Kenrick-Rochon S, Cowle S, Burke MJ, Zabjek KF, Dosaj A, Mushtaque A, Baker AJ, Bayley MT, Tartaglia MC. Characterizing the profiles of patients with acute concussion versus prolonged post-concussion symptoms in Ontario. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17955. [PMID: 37863954 PMCID: PMC10589269 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44095-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Identifying vulnerability factors for developing persisting concussion symptoms is imperative for determining which patients may require specialized treatment. Using cross-sectional questionnaire data from an Ontario-wide observational concussion study, we compared patients with acute concussion (≤ 14 days) and prolonged post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) (≥ 90 days) on four factors of interest: sex, history of mental health disorders, history of headaches/migraines, and past concussions. Differences in profile between the two groups were also explored. 110 patients with acute concussion and 96 patients with PPCS were included in our study. The groups did not differ on the four factors of interest. Interestingly, both groups had greater proportions of females (acute concussion: 61.1% F; PPCS: 66.3% F). Patient profiles, however, differed wherein patients with PPCS were significantly older, more symptomatic, more likely to have been injured in a transportation-related incident, and more likely to live outside a Metropolitan city. These novel risk factors for persisting concussion symptoms require replication and highlight the need to re-evaluate previously identified risk factors as more and more concussions occur in non-athletes and different risk factors may be at play.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia F T Scott
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Emily Boyko
- EPID@Work Research Institute, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Cindy Hunt
- Head Injury Clinic, Department of Trauma and Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Concussion Ontario Network: Neuroinformatics to Enhance Clinical Care and Translation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vicki L Kristman
- EPID@Work Research Institute, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Judith Gargaro
- Neurotrauma Care Pathways Project, KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mozhgan Khodadadi
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tharshini Chandra
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Clinic, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Umme Saika Kabir
- EPID@Work Research Institute, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Shannon Kenrick-Rochon
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Health Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | | | - Matthew J Burke
- Neuropsychiatry Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karl F Zabjek
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Dosaj
- Head Injury Clinic, Department of Trauma and Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Asma Mushtaque
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew J Baker
- Brain Health and Wellness Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Clinic, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Carmela Tartaglia
- Canadian Concussion Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steele CM, Bayley MT, Bohn MK, Higgins V, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Kulasingam V. Reference Values for Videofluoroscopic Measures of Swallowing: An Update. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2023; 66:3804-3824. [PMID: 37669617 PMCID: PMC10713020 DOI: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is essential that clinicians have evidence-based benchmarks to support accurate diagnosis and clinical decision making. Recent studies report poor reliability for diagnostic judgments and identifying mechanisms of impairment from videofluoroscopy (VFSS). Establishing VFSS reference values for healthy swallowing would help resolve such discrepancies. Steele et al. (2019) released preliminary reference data for quantitative VFSS measures in healthy adults aged < 60 years. Here, we extend that work to provide reference percentiles for VFSS measures across a larger age span. METHOD Data for 16 VFSS parameters were collected from 78 healthy adults aged 21-82 years (39 male). Participants swallowed three comfortable sips each of thin, slightly, mildly, moderately, and extremely thick barium (20% w/v). VFSS recordings were analyzed in duplicate by trained raters, blind to participant and task, using the Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) Method. Reference percentiles (p2.5, 5, 25, 50, 75, 95, and 97.5) were determined as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP28-A3c guidelines. RESULTS We present VFSS reference percentile tables, by consistency, for (a) timing parameters (swallow reaction time; the hyoid burst-to-upper esophageal sphincter (UES)-opening interval; UES opening duration; time-to-laryngeal vestibule closure (LVC); and LVC duration) and (b) anatomically scaled pixel-based measures of maximum UES diameter, pharyngeal area at maximum pharyngeal constriction and rest, residue (vallecular, pyriform, other pharyngeal locations, total), and hyoid kinematics (X, Y, XY coordinates of peak position; speed). Clinical decision limits are proposed to demarcate atypical values of potential clinical concern. CONCLUSION These updated reference percentiles and proposed clinical decision limits are intended to support interpretation and reliability for VFSS assessment data. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24043041.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona M. Steele
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canada Research Chair in Swallowing and Food Oral Processing, Canada Research Chairs Secretariat, Ottawa, Ontario
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Kathryn Bohn
- Department of Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Victoria Higgins
- DynaLIFE Medical Labs, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Vathany Kulasingam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hung SH, Tierney C, Klassen TD, Schneeberg A, Bayley MT, Dukelow SP, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, Pooyania S, Poulin MJ, Yao J, Eng JJ. Blood pressure trajectory of inpatient stroke rehabilitation patients from the Determining Optimal Post-Stroke Exercise (DOSE) trial over the first 12 months post-stroke. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1245881. [PMID: 37794879 PMCID: PMC10546336 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1245881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background High blood pressure (BP) is the primary risk factor for recurrent strokes. Despite established clinical guidelines, some stroke survivors exhibit uncontrolled BP over the first 12 months post-stroke. Furthermore, research on BP trajectories in stroke survivors admitted to inpatient rehabilitation hospitals is limited. Exercise is recommended to reduce BP after stroke. However, the effect of high repetition gait training at aerobic intensities (>40% heart rate reserve; HRR) during inpatient rehabilitation on BP is unclear. We aimed to determine the effect of an aerobic gait training intervention on BP trajectory over the first 12 months post-stroke. Methods This is a secondary analysis of the Determining Optimal Post-Stroke Exercise (DOSE) trial. Participants with stroke admitted to inpatient rehabilitation hospitals were recruited and randomized to usual care (n = 24), DOSE1 (n = 25; >2,000 steps, 40-60% HRR for >30 min/session, 20 sessions over 4 weeks), or DOSE2 (n = 25; additional DOSE1 session/day) groups. Resting BP [systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP)] was measured at baseline (inpatient rehabilitation admission), post-intervention (near inpatient discharge), 6- and 12-month post-stroke. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the effects of group and time (weeks post-stroke) on SBP, DBP and hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg; ≥130/80 mmHg, if diabetic), controlling for age, stroke type, and baseline history of hypertension. Results No effect of intervention group on SBP, DBP, or hypertension was observed. BP increased from baseline to 12-month post-stroke for SBP (from [mean ± standard deviation] 121.8 ± 15.0 to 131.8 ± 17.8 mmHg) and for DBP (74.4 ± 9.8 to 78.5 ± 10.1 mmHg). The proportion of hypertensive participants increased from 20.8% (n = 15/72) to 32.8% (n = 19/58). These increases in BP were statistically significant: an effect [estimation (95%CI), value of p] of time was observed on SBP [0.19 (0.12-0.26) mmHg/week, p < 0.001], DBP [0.09 (0.05-0.14) mmHg/week, p < 0.001], and hypertension [OR (95%CI): 1.03 (1.01-1.05), p = 0.010]. A baseline history of hypertension was associated with higher SBP by 13.45 (8.73-18.17) mmHg, higher DBP by 5.57 (2.02-9.12) mmHg, and 42.22 (6.60-270.08) times the odds of being hypertensive at each timepoint, compared to those without. Conclusion Blood pressure increased after inpatient rehabilitation over the first 12 months post-stroke, especially among those with a history of hypertension. The 4-week aerobic gait training intervention did not influence this trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley H. Hung
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Center for Aging SMART, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Tara D. Klassen
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amy Schneeberg
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sean P. Dukelow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael D. Hill
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Andrei Krassioukov
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sepideh Pooyania
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marc J. Poulin
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yao
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Janice J. Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Center for Aging SMART, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aravind G, Bashir K, Cameron JI, Bayley MT, Teasell RW, Howe JA, Tee A, Jaglal SB, Hunter S, Salbach NM. What matters to program partners when implementing a community-based exercise program for people post-stroke? A theory-based qualitative study and cost analysis. Front Rehabil Sci 2023; 4:1064206. [PMID: 37645234 PMCID: PMC10461472 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1064206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Community-based exercise programs integrating a healthcare-community partnership (CBEP-HCP) can facilitate lifelong exercise participation for people post-stroke. Understanding the process of implementation from multiple perspectives can inform strategies to promote program sustainability. Purpose To explore stakeholders' experiences with undertaking first-time implementation of a group, task-oriented CBEP-HCP for people post-stroke and describe associated personnel and travel costs. Methods We conducted a descriptive qualitative study within a pilot randomized controlled trial. In three cities, trained fitness instructors delivered a 12-week CBEP-HCP targeting balance and mobility limitations to people post-stroke at a recreation centre with support from a healthcare partner. Healthcare and recreation managers and personnel at each site participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups by telephone post-intervention. Interviews and data analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research and Theoretical Domains Framework, for managers and program providers, respectively. We estimated personnel and travel costs associated with implementing the program. Results Twenty individuals from three sites (4 recreation and 3 healthcare managers, 7 fitness instructors, 3 healthcare partners, and 3 volunteers) participated. We identified two themes related to the decision to partner and implement the program: (1) Program quality and packaging, and cost-benefit comparisons influenced managers' decisions to partner and implement the CBEP-HCP, and (2) Previous experiences and beliefs about program benefits influenced staff decisions to become instructors. We identified two additional themes related to experiences with training and program delivery: (1) Program staff with previous experience and training faced initial role-based challenges that resolved with program delivery, and (2) Organizational capacity to manage program resource requirements influenced managers' decisions to continue the program. Participants identified recommendations related to partnership formation, staff/volunteer selection, training, and delivery of program activities. Costs (in CAD) for first-time program implementation were: healthcare partner ($680); fitness coordinators and instructors ($3,153); and participant transportation (personal vehicle: $283; public transit: $110). Conclusion During first-time implementation of a CBEP-HCP, healthcare and hospital managers focused on cost, resource requirements, and the added-value of the program, while instructors and healthcare partners focused on their preparedness for the role and their ability to manage individuals with balance and mobility limitations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03122626. Registered April 17, 2017-Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03122626.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayatri Aravind
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Community Programs and After Stroke, March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kainat Bashir
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jill I. Cameron
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert W. Teasell
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, St. Joseph’s Healthcare London—Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jo-Anne Howe
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alda Tee
- Central East Stroke Network, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan B. Jaglal
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Hunter
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy M. Salbach
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kokorelias KM, Cameron JI, Salbach NM, Colquhoun H, Munce SEP, Nelson MLA, Martyniuk J, Steele Gray C, Tang T, Hitzig SL, Lindsay MP, Bayley MT, Wang RH, Kaur N, Singh H. Exploring the Poststroke Experiences and Needs of South Asian Communities Living in High-Income Countries: Findings from a Scoping Review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023:10.1007/s40615-023-01613-6. [PMID: 37382872 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01613-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Despite the high prevalence of stroke among South Asian communities in high-income countries, a comprehensive understanding of their unique experiences and needs after stroke is lacking. This study aimed to synthesize the literature examining the experiences and needs of South Asian community members impacted by stroke and their family caregivers residing in high-income countries. A scoping review methodology was utilized. Data for this review were identified from seven databases and hand-searching reference lists of included studies. Study characteristics, purpose, methods, participant characteristics, results, limitations, recommendations, and conclusions were extracted. Data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis. In addition, a consultative focus group exercise with six South Asian community members who had experienced a stroke and a program facilitator was conducted to inform the review interpretations. A total of 26 articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Qualitative analysis identified four descriptive categories: (1) rationale for studying the South Asian stroke population (e.g., increasing South Asian population and stroke prevalence), (2) stroke-related experiences (e.g., managing community support versus stigma and caregiving expectations), (3) stroke service challenges (e.g., language barriers), and (4) stroke service recommendations to address stroke service needs (e.g., continuity of care). Several cultural factors impacted participant experiences, including cultural beliefs about illness and caregiving. Focus group participants from our consultation activity agreed with our review findings. The clinical and research recommendations identified in this review support the need for culturally appropriate services for South Asian communities across the stroke care continuum; however, more research is necessary to inform the design and structure of culturally appropriate stroke service delivery models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina M Kokorelias
- Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Program, Sinai Health System, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jill I Cameron
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sarah E P Munce
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julia Martyniuk
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Terence Tang
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sander L Hitzig
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Mark T Bayley
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rosalie H Wang
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Navaldeep Kaur
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peters S, Lohse KR, Klassen TD, Liu-Ambrose T, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Hill MD, Pooyania S, Yao J, Eng JJ. Higher intensity walking improves global cognition during inpatient rehabilitation: a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1023488. [PMID: 37360352 PMCID: PMC10289188 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1023488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive deficits are common poststroke. Cognitive rehabilitation is typically used to improve cognitive deficits. It is unknown whether higher doses of exercise to promote motor recovery influence cognitive outcomes. Our recent trial, Determining Optimal Post-Stroke Exercise (DOSE), shows more than double the steps and aerobic minutes can be achieved during inpatient rehabilitation versus usual care, and translates to improved long-term walking outcomes. Thus, the secondary analysis aim was to determine the effect of the DOSE protocol on cognitive outcomes over 1-year poststroke. The DOSE protocol progressively increased step number and aerobic minutes during inpatient stroke rehabilitation over 20 sessions. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and Trail Making Test B were completed at baseline, post-intervention, and 6- and 12-months poststroke, administered using standardized guidelines. Using the DOSE data, we used mixed-effect spline regression to model participants' trajectories of cognitive recovery, controlling for relevant covariates. Participants (Usual Care n = 25, DOSE n = 50) were 56.7(11.7) years old, and 27(10) days post stroke. For the MoCA, there were statistically significant Group × Trajectory(p = 0.019), and Group × ΔTrajectory (p = 0.018) interactions with a substantial clinically meaningful difference, from +5.44 points/month improvement of the DOSE group compared to +1.59 points/month improvement with Usual Care during the 4-week intervention. The DSST and Trails B improved over time but were not different between groups. Taking advantage of this early difference may lend support to continued efforts to increase intensity, during and after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, to improve cognition. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01915368.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Peters
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Keith R. Lohse
- Program in Physical Therapy and Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Tara D. Klassen
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Teresa Liu-Ambrose
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sean P. Dukelow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael D. Hill
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sepideh Pooyania
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yao
- Centre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Janice J. Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Silverberg ND, Iverson GL, Cogan A, Dams-O'Connor K, Delmonico R, Graf MJP, Iaccarino MA, Kajankova M, Kamins J, McCulloch KL, McKinney G, Nagele D, Panenka WJ, Rabinowitz AR, Reed N, Wethe JV, Whitehair V, Anderson V, Arciniegas DB, Bayley MT, Bazarian JJ, Bell KR, Broglio SP, Cifu D, Davis GA, Dvorak J, Echemendia RJ, Gioia GA, Giza CC, Hinds SR, Katz DI, Kurowski BG, Leddy JJ, Sage NL, Lumba-Brown A, Maas AIR, Manley GT, McCrea M, Menon DK, Ponsford J, Putukian M, Suskauer SJ, van der Naalt J, Walker WC, Yeates KO, Zafonte R, Zasler ND, Zemek R. The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023:S0003-9993(23)00297-6. [PMID: 37211140 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop new diagnostic criteria for mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) that are appropriate for use across the lifespan and in sports, civilian trauma, and military settings. DESIGN Rapid evidence reviews on 12 clinical questions and Delphi method for expert consensus. PARTICIPANTS The Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Task Force of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Brain Injury Special Interest Group convened a Working Group of 17 members and an external interdisciplinary expert panel of 32 clinician-scientists. Public stakeholder feedback was analyzed from 68 individuals and 23 organizations. RESULTS The first two Delphi votes asked the expert panel to rate their agreement with both the diagnostic criteria for mild TBI and the supporting evidence statements. In the first round, 10 of 12 evidence statements reached consensus agreement. Revised evidence statements underwent a second round of expert panel voting, where consensus was achieved for all. For the diagnostic criteria, the final agreement rate, after the third vote, was 90.7%. Public stakeholder feedback was incorporated into the diagnostic criteria revision prior to the third expert panel vote. A terminology question was added to the third round of Delphi voting, where 30 of 32 (93.8%) expert panel members agreed that 'the diagnostic label 'concussion' may be used interchangeably with 'mild TBI' when neuroimaging is normal or not clinically indicated.' CONCLUSIONS New diagnostic criteria for mild TBI were developed through an evidence review and expert consensus process. Having unified diagnostic criteria for mild TBI can improve the quality and consistency of mild TBI research and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah D Silverberg
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z4.
| | - Grant L Iverson
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School; Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and the Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding Rehabilitation; MassGeneral Hospital for Children Sports Concussion Program; & Home Base, A Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 79/96 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown Navy Yard, Charlestown, MA, 02129.
| | - Alison Cogan
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System; 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073.
| | - Kristen Dams-O'Connor
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance & Department of Neurology, Brain Injury Research Center of Mount Sinai, Box 1163, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA 10029. kristen.dams-o'
| | - Richard Delmonico
- Kaiser Foundation Rehabilitation Center, The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, 975 Sereno Drive, Vallejo, CA, USA 94589.
| | - Min Jeong P Graf
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hennepin Healthcare; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 701 Park Ave, Minneapolis, MN, USA 55415.
| | - Mary Alexis Iaccarino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 1(st) Ave, Charlestown, MA, USA 02129; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 1(st) Ave, Charlestown, MA, USA 02129.
| | - Maria Kajankova
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Brain Injury Research Center of Mount Sinai, Box 1163, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA 10029.
| | - Joshua Kamins
- UCLA Steve Tisch BrainSPORT Program, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 300 Medical Plaza Ste B-200 Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095.
| | - Karen L McCulloch
- Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3030 Bondurant Hall, CB# 7135, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 27599-7135.
| | - Gary McKinney
- Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, 1335 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD, USA 20910.
| | - Drew Nagele
- School of Professional and Applied Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4170 City Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19131.
| | - William J Panenka
- British Columbia Neuropsychiatry Program; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T2A1.
| | - Amanda R Rabinowitz
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 50 Township Line Rd., Elkins Park, PA, USA, 19027.
| | - Nick Reed
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G1V7.
| | - Jennifer V Wethe
- Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, USA 85259.
| | - Victoria Whitehair
- MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute and Case Western Reserve University; 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH, USA 44109.
| | - Vicki Anderson
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052 Australia.
| | - David B Arciniegas
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine; University of Colorado School of Medicine; 1635 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO, USA 80045.
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network; University of Toronto; Room 3-102-12, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G2A2.
| | - Jeffrey J Bazarian
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry; 265 Crittenden Blvd Box 655c, Rochester, NY, USA 14642.
| | - Kathleen R Bell
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, USA, 75390.
| | - Steven P Broglio
- University of Michigan, Michigan Concussion Center; 830 N University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.
| | - David Cifu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; 1223 East Marshall Street, Richmond, VA, USA 23298.
| | - Gavin A Davis
- Cabrini Health; Suite 53 - Neurosurgery, Cabrini Malvern, Victoria, 3144, Australia.
| | - Jiri Dvorak
- Schulthess Clinic, Department of Neurology, Swiss Concussion Center; Lengghalde 2, CH-8008, Switzerland.
| | - Ruben J Echemendia
- University Orthopedics Center, Concussion Care Clinic; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA. 107 Picadilly Rd., Port Matilda, PA, USA 16870.
| | - Gerard A Gioia
- Division of Neuropsychology/ SCORE Concussion Program, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine; 15245 Shady Grove Road #350, Rockville, MD, USA 20850.
| | - Christopher C Giza
- University of California at Los Angeles, Departments of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, Steve Tisch BrainSPORT Program; Room 557 Wasserman, Department of Neurosurgery, 300 Stein Plaza, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095.
| | - Sidney R Hinds
- Uniformed Services University, Department of Neurology and Radiology, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814.
| | - Douglas I Katz
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine; 72 E. Concord St. Robinson (B3), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA 02118.
| | - Brad G Kurowski
- Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology, and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 4009, Cincinnati, OH, USA 45229.
| | - John J Leddy
- UBMD Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine; SUNY Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences; 160 Farber Hall, Buffalo, NY, USA 14214.
| | - Natalie Le Sage
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Axis, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre; VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable; 1401, 18e rue, Québec, Canada, G1J 1Z4.
| | - Angela Lumba-Brown
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University; 900 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, USA 94303.
| | - Andrew I R Maas
- Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, and University of Antwerp; Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco; 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA, USA 94110.
| | - Michael McCrea
- Medical College of Wisconsin; 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, USA 53226.
| | - David K Menon
- University of Cambridge; Box 93, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash University; 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton campus, VIC 3800, Australia.
| | | | - Stacy J Suskauer
- Kennedy Krieger Institute and Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; 707 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD, USA 21205.
| | - Joukje van der Naalt
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen; Netherlands.
| | - William C Walker
- Virginia Commonwealth University; 1223 East Marshall Street, 4(th) Fl., Box 980677, Richmond, VA, USA 23298-0677.
| | - Keith Owen Yeates
- Department of Psychology, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary; 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Ross Zafonte
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital/Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School; 300 First Avenue, Boston, MA, USA 02129.
| | - Nathan D Zasler
- Concussion Care Centre of Virginia, Ltd.; 3721 Westerre Parkway, Suite B, Henrico, VA, USA 23233.
| | - Roger Zemek
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8L1.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peters S, Lim SB, Bayley MT, Best K, Connell LA, Corriveau H, Donkers SJ, Dukelow SP, Klassen TD, Milot MH, Sakakibara BM, Sheehy L, Wong H, Yao J, Eng JJ. Implementation of increased physical therapy intensity for improving walking after stroke: Walk 'n watch protocol for a multisite stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke 2023; 18:117-122. [PMID: 36129364 PMCID: PMC9806455 DOI: 10.1177/17474930221129982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Clinical practice guidelines support structured, progressive protocols for improving walking after stroke. Yet, practice is slow to change, evidenced by the little amount of walking activity in stroke rehabilitation units. Our recent study (n = 75) found that a structured, progressive protocol integrated with typical daily physical therapy improved walking and quality-of-life measures over usual care. Research therapists progressed the intensity of exercise by using heart rate and step counters worn by the participants with stroke during therapy. To have the greatest impact, our next step is to undertake an implementation trial to change practice across stroke units where we enable the entire unit to use the protocol as part of standard of care. AIMS What is the effect of introducing structured, progressive exercise (termed the Walk 'n Watch protocol) to the standard of care on the primary outcome of walking in adult participants with stroke over the hospital inpatient rehabilitation period? Secondary outcomes will be evaluated and include quality of life. METHODS AND SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES This national, multisite clinical trial will randomize 12 sites using a stepped-wedge design where each site will be randomized to deliver Usual Care initially for 4, 8, 12, or 16 months (three sites for each duration). Then, each site will switch to the Walk 'n Watch phase for the remaining duration of a total 20-month enrolment period. Each participant will be exposed to either Usual Care or Walk 'n Watch. The trial will enroll a total of 195 participants with stroke to achieve a power of 80% with a Type I error rate of 5%, allowing for 20% dropout. Participants will be medically stable adults post-stroke and able to take five steps with a maximum physical assistance from one therapist. The Walk 'n Watch protocol focuses on completing a minimum of 30 min of weight-bearing, walking-related activities (at the physical therapists' discretion) that progressively increase in intensity informed by activity trackers measuring heart rate and step number. STUDY OUTCOME(S) The primary outcome will be the change in walking endurance, measured by the 6-Minute Walk Test, from baseline (T1) to 4 weeks (T2). This change will be compared across Usual Care and Walk 'n Watch phases using a linear mixed-effects model. Additional physical, cognitive, and quality of life outcomes will be measured at T1, T2, and 12 months post-stroke (T3) by a blinded assessor. DISCUSSION The implementation of stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial enables the protocol to be tested under real-world conditions, involving all clinicians on the unit. It will result in all sites and all clinicians on the unit to gain expertise in protocol delivery. Hence, a deliberate outcome of the trial is facilitating changes in best practice to improve outcomes for participants with stroke in the trial and for the many participants with stroke admitted after the trial ends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Peters
- School of Physical Therapy, University
of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada,Rehabilitation Research Program, G.F.
Strong Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Physical Therapy, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shannon B Lim
- Rehabilitation Research Program, G.F.
Strong Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Physical Therapy, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, University of Toronto and KITE Research Institute University Health
Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Krista Best
- Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de
Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale and Department of Rehabilitation,
Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Louise A Connell
- Allied Health Research Unit, University
of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK,Rakehead Rehabilitation Centre, Burnley
General Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley, UK
| | - Hélène Corriveau
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculté de
médecine et des sciences de la santé and Research Center on Aging, Université de
Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah J Donkers
- School of Rehabilitation Science,
College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Sean P Dukelow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences,
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Tara D Klassen
- Rehabilitation Research Program, G.F.
Strong Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Physical Therapy, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Milot
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculté de
médecine et des sciences de la santé and Research Center on Aging, Université de
Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Brodie M Sakakibara
- Department of Occupational Science
and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,
Canada,Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention
and Management, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Lisa Sheehy
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa,
ON, Canada
| | - Hubert Wong
- School of Population and Public
Health, University of British Columbia and Centre for Health Evaluation &
Outcomes Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yao
- Division of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia and G.F. Strong Rehabilitation
Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- Rehabilitation Research Program, G.F.
Strong Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Physical Therapy, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Janice J Eng, Rehabilitation Research
Program, G.F. Strong Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Physical Therapy,
University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3,
Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salbach NM, MacKay-Lyons M, Howe JA, McDonald A, Solomon P, Bayley MT, McEwen S, Nelson M, Bulmer B, Lovasi GS. Assessment of Walking Speed and Distance Post-Stroke Increases After Providing a Theory-Based Toolkit. J Neurol Phys Ther 2022; 46:251-259. [PMID: 35671402 PMCID: PMC9462135 DOI: 10.1097/npt.0000000000000406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE While underutilized, poststroke administration of the 10-m walk test (10mWT) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) can improve care and is considered best practice. We aimed to evaluate provision of a toolkit designed to increase use of these tests by physical therapists (PTs). METHODS In a before-and-after study, 54 PTs and professional leaders in 9 hospitals were provided a toolkit and access to a clinical expert over a 5-month period. The toolkit comprised a guide, smartphone app, and video, and described how to set up walkways, implement learning sessions, administer walk tests, and interpret and apply test results clinically. The proportion of hospital visits for which each walk test score was documented at least once (based on abstracted health records of ambulatory patients) were compared over 8-month periods pre- and post-intervention using generalized mixed models. RESULTS Data from 347 and 375 pre- and postintervention hospital visits, respectively, were analyzed. Compared with preintervention, the odds of implementing the 10mWT were 12 times greater (odds ratio [OR] = 12.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8, 26.3), and of implementing the 6MWT were approximately 4 times greater (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 2.3, 6.7), post-intervention, after adjusting for hospital setting, ambulation ability, presence of aphasia and cognitive impairment, and provider-level clustering. Unadjusted change in the percentage of visits for which the 10mWT/6MWT was documented at least once was smallest in acute care settings (2.0/3.8%), and largest in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings (28.0/19.9% and 29.4/23.4%, respectively). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Providing a comprehensive toolkit to hospitals with professional leaders likely contributed to increasing 10mWT and 6MWT administration during inpatient and outpatient stroke rehabilitation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A390 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy M. Salbach
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Marilyn MacKay-Lyons
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Jo-Anne Howe
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Alison McDonald
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Patricia Solomon
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Sara McEwen
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Michelle Nelson
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Beverly Bulmer
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| | - Gina S. Lovasi
- Departments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reszel J, van den Hoek J, Nguyen T, Aravind G, Bayley MT, Bird ML, Edwards K, Eng JJ, Moore JL, Nelson MLA, Ploughman M, Richardson J, Salbach NM, Tang A, Graham ID. The Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner: Mixed Methods User Evaluation. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e37189. [PMID: 35904870 PMCID: PMC9377478 DOI: 10.2196/37189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As more people are surviving stroke, there is a growing need for services and programs that support the long-term needs of people living with the effects of stroke. Exercise has many benefits; however, most people with stroke do not have access to specialized exercise programs that meet their needs in their communities. To catalyze the implementation of these programs, our team developed the Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner, an evidence-informed implementation guide for teams planning a community-based exercise program for people with stroke. Objective This study aimed to conduct a user evaluation to elicit user perceptions of the usefulness and acceptability of the Planner to inform revisions. Methods This mixed methods study used a concurrent triangulation design. We used purposive sampling to enroll a diverse sample of end users (program managers and coordinators, rehabilitation health partners, and fitness professionals) from three main groups: those who are currently planning a program, those who intend to plan a program in the future, and those who had previously planned a program. Participants reviewed the Planner and completed a questionnaire and interviews to identify positive features, areas of improvement, value, and feasibility. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. We triangulated the data sources to identify Planner modifications. Results A total of 39 people participated in this study. Overall, the feedback was positive, highlighting the value of the Planner’s comprehensiveness, tools and templates, and real-world examples. The identified areas for improvement included clarifying the need for specific steps, refining navigation, and creating more action-oriented content. Most participants reported an increase in knowledge and confidence after reading the Planner and reported that using the resource would improve their planning approach. Conclusions We used a rigorous and user-centered process to develop and evaluate the Planner. End users indicated that it is a valuable resource and identified specific changes for improvement. The Planner was subsequently updated and is now publicly available for community planning teams to use in the planning and delivery of evidence-informed, sustainable, community-based exercise programs for people with stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Reszel
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tram Nguyen
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Louise Bird
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kate Edwards
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Janice J Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Moore
- South Eastern Norway Regional Knowledge Translation Center, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN, United States
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Ploughman
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ada Tang
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reszel J, van den Hoek J, Nguyen T, Aravind G, Bayley MT, Bird ML, Edwards K, Eng JJ, Moore JL, Nelson MLA, Ploughman M, Richardson J, Salbach NM, Tang A, Graham ID. How Community-Based Teams Use the Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner: Longitudinal Qualitative Field Test Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e37243. [PMID: 35904855 PMCID: PMC9377454 DOI: 10.2196/37243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner guides teams through the process of planning for the implementation of community-based exercise programs for people with stroke, in alignment with implementation science frameworks. Objective The purpose of this study was to conduct a field test with end users to describe how teams used the Planner in real-world conditions; describe the effects of Planner use on participants’ implementation-planning knowledge, attitudes, and activities; and identify factors influencing the use of the Planner. Methods This field test study used a longitudinal qualitative design. We recruited teams across Canada who intended to implement a community-based exercise program for people with stroke in the next 6 to 12 months and were willing to use the Planner to guide their work. We completed semistructured interviews at the time of enrollment, monitoring calls every 1 to 2 months, and at the end of the study to learn about implementation-planning work completed and Planner use. The interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Completed Planner steps were plotted onto a timeline for comparison across teams. Results We enrolled 12 participants (program managers and coordinators, rehabilitation professionals, and fitness professionals) from 5 planning teams. The teams were enrolled in the study between 4 and 14 months, and we conducted 25 interviews. We observed that the teams worked through the planning process in diverse and nonlinear ways, adapted to their context. All teams provided examples of how using the Planner changed their implementation-planning knowledge (eg, knowing the steps), attitudes (eg, valuing community engagement), and activities (eg, hosting stakeholder meetings). We identified team, organizational, and broader contextual factors that hindered and facilitated uptake of the Planner. Participants shared valuable tips from the field to help future teams optimize use of the Planner. Conclusions The Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner is an adaptable resource that may be used in diverse settings to plan community-based exercise programs for people with stroke. These findings may be informative to others who are developing resources to build the capacity of those working in community-based settings to implement new programs and practices. Future work is needed to monitor the use and understand the effect of using the Planner on exercise program implementation and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Reszel
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tram Nguyen
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Louise Bird
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, ON, Canada
| | - Kate Edwards
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Janice J Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Moore
- South Eastern Norway Regional Knowledge Translation Center, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN, United States
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Ploughman
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ada Tang
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aravind G, Bashir K, Cameron JI, Howe JA, Jaglal SB, Bayley MT, Teasell RW, Moineddin R, Zee J, Wodchis WP, Tee A, Hunter S, Salbach NM. Community-based exercise programs incorporating healthcare-community partnerships to improve function post-stroke: feasibility of a 2-group randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:88. [PMID: 35459194 PMCID: PMC9028093 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01037-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the potential for community-based exercise programs supported through healthcare-community partnerships (CBEP-HCPs) to improve function post-stroke, insufficient trial evidence limits widespread program implementation and funding. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a CBEP-HCP compared to a waitlist control group to improve everyday function among people post-stroke. Methods We conducted a 3-site, pilot randomized trial with blinded follow-up evaluations at 3, 6, and 10 months. Community-dwelling adults able to walk 10 m were stratified by site and gait speed and randomized (1:1) to a CBEP-HCP or waitlist control group. The CBEP-HCP involved a 1-h, group exercise class, with repetitive and progressive practice of functional balance and mobility tasks, twice a week for 12 weeks. We offered the exercise program to the waitlist group at 10 months. We interviewed 13 participants and 9 caregivers post-intervention and triangulated quantitative and qualitative results. Study outcomes included feasibility of recruitment, interventions, retention, and data collection, and potential effect on everyday function. Results Thirty-three people with stroke were randomized to the intervention (n = 16) or waitlist group (n = 17). We recruited 1–2 participants/month at each site. Participants preferred being recruited by a familiar healthcare professional. Participants described a 10- or 12-month wait in the control group as too long. The exercise program was implemented per protocol across sites. Five participants (31%) in the intervention group attended fewer than 50% of classes for health reasons. In the intervention and waitlist group, retention was 88% and 82%, respectively, and attendance at 10-month evaluations was 63% and 71%, respectively. Participants described inclement weather, availability of transportation, and long commutes as barriers to attending exercise classes and evaluations. Among participants in the CBEP-HCP who attended ≥ 50% of classes, quantitative and qualitative results suggested an immediate effect of the intervention on balance, balance self-efficacy, lower limb strength, everyday function, and overall health. Conclusion The CBEP-HCP appears feasible and potentially beneficial. Findings will inform protocol revisions to optimize recruitment, and program and evaluation attendance in a future trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03122626. Registered April 21, 2017 — retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayatri Aravind
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Kainat Bashir
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Jill I Cameron
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Jo-Anne Howe
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Susan B Jaglal
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.,The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.,The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, C. David Naylor Building, 6 Queen's Park Crescent West, Third Floor, London, ON, M5S 3H2, Canada
| | - Robert W Teasell
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, St Joseph's Health Care London - Parkwood Institute, 550 Wellington Rd, London, ON, N6C 0A7, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 160‑500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Joanne Zee
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Alda Tee
- Central East Stroke Network, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, 201 Georgian Drive, Barrie, ON, L4M6M2, Canada
| | - Susan Hunter
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada. .,The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Simpson LA, Barclay R, Bayley MT, Dukelow SP, MacIntosh BJ, MacKay-Lyons M, Menon C, Mortenson WB, Peng TH, Pollock CL, Pooyania S, Teasell R, Yang CL, Yao J, Eng JJ. Correction: Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC): study protocol for a mixed-methods study to increase upper limb recovery after stroke with an intensive program coupled with a grasp count device. Trials 2022; 23:207. [PMID: 35277187 PMCID: PMC8915457 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06134-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Simpson
- Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ruth Barclay
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto and KITE Research Institute University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sean P Dukelow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | - Carlo Menon
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Ben Mortenson
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tzu-Hsuan Peng
- Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Courtney L Pollock
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sepideh Pooyania
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Robert Teasell
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Chieh-Ling Yang
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Jennifer Yao
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada. .,International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, Canada. .,Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. .,University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Simpson LA, Barclay R, Bayley MT, Dukelow SP, MacIntosh BJ, McKay-Lyons M, Menon C, Mortenson WB, Peng TH, Pollock CL, Pooyania S, Teasell R, Yang CL, Yao J, Eng JJ. Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC): study protocol for a mixed-methods study to increase upper limb recovery after stroke with an intensive program coupled with a grasp count device. Trials 2022; 23:129. [PMID: 35135585 PMCID: PMC8822776 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06047-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Encouraging upper limb use and increasing intensity of practice in rehabilitation are two important goals for optimizing upper limb recovery post stroke. Feedback from novel wearable sensors may influence practice behaviour to promote achieving these goals. A wearable sensor can potentially be used in conjunction with a virtually monitored home program for greater patient convenience, or due to restrictions that preclude in-person visits, such as COVID-19. This trial aims to (1) determine the efficacy of a virtual behaviour change program that relies on feedback from a custom wearable sensor to increase use and function of the upper limb post stroke; and (2) explore the experiences and perceptions of using a program coupled with wearable sensors to increase arm use from the perspective of people with stroke. Methods This mixed-methods study will utilize a prospective controlled trial with random allocation to immediate or 3-week delayed entry to determine the efficacy of a 3-week behaviour change program with a nested qualitative description study. The intervention, the Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC) features feedback from a wearable device, which is intended to increase upper limb use post stroke, as well as 6 virtual sessions with a therapist. Sixty-four adults within 1-year post stroke onset will be recruited from seven rehabilitation centres. All outcomes will be collected virtually. The primary outcome measure is upper limb use measured by grasp counts over 3 days from the wearable sensor (TENZR) after the 3-week intervention. Secondary outcomes include upper limb function (Arm Capacity and Movement Test) and self-reported function (Hand Function and Strength subscale from the Stroke Impact Scale). Outcome data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention and at 2 months retention. The qualitative component will explore the experiences and acceptability of using a home program with a wearable sensor for increasing arm use from the point of view of individuals with stroke. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants after they have experienced the intervention. Qualitative data will be analysed using content analysis. Discussion This study will provide novel information regarding the efficacy and acceptability of virtually delivered programs to improve upper extremity recovery, and the use of wearable sensors to assist with behaviour change. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04232163. January 18, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Simpson
- Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ruth Barclay
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto and KITE Research Institute University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sean P Dukelow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | - Carlo Menon
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Ben Mortenson
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tzu-Hsuan Peng
- Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Courtney L Pollock
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sepideh Pooyania
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Robert Teasell
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Chieh-Ling Yang
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Jennifer Yao
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada. .,International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, Canada. .,Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. .,University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Silverberg ND, Cairncross M, Brasher PMA, Vranceanu AM, Snell DL, Yeates KO, Panenka WJ, Iverson GL, Debert CT, Bayley MT, Hunt C, Baker A, Burke MJ. Feasibility of concussion rehabilitation approaches tailored to psychological coping styles: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 103:1565-1573.e2. [PMID: 34971596 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of a clinical trial involving participants with concussion randomized to treatments designed to address fear avoidance or endurance coping, which are risk factors for disability. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether each treatment could effect selective change on targeted coping outcomes. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Outpatient concussion clinics. PARTICIPANTS 73 adults (M=42.5 years old) who had persistent post-concussion symptoms and high avoidance or endurance behavior were enrolled at M=12.9 weeks post injury. 10 participants did not complete treatment. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program delivered via videoconferencing and tailored to avoidance coping (graded exposure therapy; GET) or endurance coping (operant condition-based pacing strategies plus mindfulness training; Pacing+). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility outcomes included screening efficiency, accrual, credibility, treatment fidelity, adherence, and retention. Avoidance was measured with the Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury questionnaire and endurance behavior with the Behavioral Response to Illness Questionnaire. RESULTS Screening efficiency, or the proportion of clinic patients who were assessed for eligibility, was 44.5% (275/618). 65.8% (73/111) of eligible patients were randomized (n=37 to GET and n=36 to Pacing+), meeting accrual targets. 91.7% (55/60) of participants perceived treatment as credible. Therapists covered M=96.8% of essential prescribed elements, indicating excellent fidelity. The majority (71.2%; 47/66) of participants consistently attended treatment sessions and completed between-session homework. Retention was strong, with 65 of 73 (89%) randomized participants completing the outcome assessment. GET was associated with greater post-treatment reductions in avoidance behavior compared to Pacing+ (Cohen's drepeated measures = 0.81), whereas the treatment approach-specific effect of Pacing+ on endurance behavior was less pronounced (Cohen's drepeated measures = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS Findings support a future efficacy-focused clinical trial. GET has the potential to selectively reduce fear avoidance behavior after concussion, and, via this mechanism, to prevent or reduce disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah D Silverberg
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute.
| | - Molly Cairncross
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
| | - Penelope M A Brasher
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Deborah L Snell
- Concussion Clinic, Canterbury District Health Board, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago
| | - Keith Owen Yeates
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary
| | - William J Panenka
- British Columbia Neuropsychiatry Program, BC Mental Health and Substance Use Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia
| | - Grant L Iverson
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Spaulding Research Institute, MassGeneral Hospital for Children™ Sports Concussion Program, Home Base, A Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Program
| | - Chantel T Debert
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Calgary, Hotchhiss Brain Institute, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network
| | - Cindy Hunt
- Head Injury Clinic, Trauma and Neurosurgery Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
| | - Andrew Baker
- Head Injury Clinic, Trauma and Neurosurgery Program, St. Michael's Hospital
| | - Matthew J Burke
- Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry and Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Salbach NM, McDonald A, MacKay-Lyons M, Bulmer B, Howe JA, Bayley MT, McEwen S, Nelson M, Solomon P. Experiences of Physical Therapists and Professional Leaders With Implementing a Toolkit to Advance Walking Assessment Poststroke: A Realist Evaluation. Phys Ther 2021; 101:pzab232. [PMID: 34636908 PMCID: PMC8715419 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The iWalk study showed significant increase in use of the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) poststroke following provision of a toolkit. This paper examined the influence of contextual circumstances on use of the toolkit and implementation strategy across acute care and inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings. METHODS A theory-based toolkit and implementation strategy was designed to support guideline recommendations to use standardized tools for evaluation of walking, education, and goal-setting poststroke. The toolkit comprised a mobile app, video, and educational guide outlining instructions for 3 learning sessions. After completing learning sessions, 33 physical therapists and 7 professional leaders participated in focus groups or interviews. As part of a realist evaluation, the study compared and synthesized site-specific context-mechanism-outcome descriptions across sites to refine an initial theory of how the toolkit would influence practice. RESULTS Analysis revealed 3 context-mechanism-outcomes: (1) No onsite facilitator? No practice change in acute care: Without an onsite facilitator, participants lacked authority to facilitate and coordinate the implementation strategy; (2) Onsite facilitation fostered integration of select practices in acute care: When onsite facilitation occurred in acute care, walk test administration and use of reference values for patient education were adopted variably with high functioning patients; (3) Onsite facilitation fostered integration of most practices in rehabilitation settings: When onsite facilitation occurred, many participants incorporated 1 or both tests to evaluate and monitor walking capacity, and reference values were applied for inpatient and outpatient education and goal setting. Participants preferentially implemented the 10MWT over the 6MWT because set-up and administration were easier and a greater proportion of patients could walk 10 m. CONCLUSION Findings underscore contextual factors and activities essential to eliciting change in assessment practice in stroke rehabilitation across care settings. IMPACT This study shows that to foster recommended walking assessment practices, an onsite facilitator should be present to enable learning sessions and toolkit use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy M Salbach
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Jo-Anne Howe
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara McEwen
- Selkirk College, Castlegar, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michelle Nelson
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patricia Solomon
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Langer LK, Comper P, Ruttan L, Saverino C, Alavinia SM, Inness EL, Kam A, Lawrence DW, Tam A, Chandra T, Foster E, Bayley MT. Can Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) Symptom Scores Be Converted to Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) Scores and Vice Versa? Findings From the Toronto Concussion Study. Front Sports Act Living 2021; 3:737402. [PMID: 34778758 PMCID: PMC8583872 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.737402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) are widely used self-report tools assessing the type, number, and severity of concussion symptoms. There are overlapping symptoms and domains, though they are scored differently. The SCAT consists of 22 questions with a 7-point Likert scale for a total possible score 132. The RPQ has 16 questions and a 5-point Likert scale for a total of 64 possible points. Being able to convert between the two scores would facilitate comparison of results in the concussion literature. Objectives: To develop equations to convert scores on the SCAT to the RPQ and vice versa. Methods: Adults (17–85 years) diagnosed with a concussion at a referring emergency department were seen in the Hull-Ellis Concussion and Research Clinic, a rapid access concussion clinic at Toronto Rehab–University Health Network (UHN) Toronto Canada, within 7 days of injury. The RPQ and SCAT symptom checklists as well as demographic questionnaires were administered to all participants at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16. Results: 215 participants had 1,168 matched RPQ and SCAT assessments. Total scores of the RPQ and the SCAT had a rho = 0.91 (p < 0.001); correlations were lower for sub-scores of specific symptom domains (range 0.74–0.87, p < 0.001 for all domain comparisons). An equation was derived to calculate SCAT scores using the number and severity of symptoms on the RPQ. Estimated scores were within 3 points of the observed total score on the SCAT. A second equation was derived to calculate the RPQ from the proportion weighted total score of the SCAT. This equation estimated corresponding scores within 3 points of the observed score on the RPQ. Conclusions: The RPQ and SCAT symptom checklists total scores are highly correlated and can be used to estimate the total score on the corresponding assessment. The symptom subdomains are also strongly correlated between the 2 scales however not as strongly correlated as the total score. The equations will enable researchers and clinicians to quickly convert between the scales and to directly compare concussion research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Kathleen Langer
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Comper
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lesley Ruttan
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cristina Saverino
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Seyed Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehab, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth L Inness
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alice Kam
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David W Lawrence
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alan Tam
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tharshini Chandra
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Evan Foster
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehab, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cairncross M, Debert CT, Hunt C, Bayley MT, Comper P, Chandra T, Silverberg ND. Normative Data for the Fear Avoidance Behavior After Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire in a Clinical Sample of Adults With Mild TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2021; 36:E355-E362. [PMID: 33741828 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fear avoidance behavior after a concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is associated with a number of adverse outcomes, such as higher symptom burden, emotional distress, and disability. The Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire (FAB-TBI) is a recently developed and validated self-report measure of fear avoidance after mTBI. The objective of this study was to derive clinical normative data for the FAB-TBI. To determine whether demographic stratification was necessary and to further support clinical interpretation, we also explored associations between fear avoidance behavior and demographic and injury variables. SETTING Five concussion clinics in Canada. PARTICIPANTS Adults who sustained an mTBI (N = 563). DESIGN Cross-sectional. MAIN MEASURES Participants completed the Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire (FAB-TBI) and measures of postconcussion symptom burden (Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire, Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5) at clinic intake. RESULTS Generalized linear modeling revealed that females reported more fear avoidance than males (95% CI = 0.66 to 2.75), indicating that FAB-TBI normative data should be stratified by sex. Differences between recruitment sites on FAB-TBI scores were reduced but not eliminated by controlling for potential confounds. Loss of consciousness (95% CI =0.61 to 2.76) and higher postconcussion symptom burden (95% CI = 0.79 to 1.03) were also associated with higher FAB-TBI scores, but time since injury was not (95% = CI -0.4 to 0.03). Tables to convert FAB-TBI raw scores to Rasch scores to percentiles are presented. CONCLUSION These findings support clinical interpretation of the FAB-TBI and further study of fear avoidance after mTBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Cairncross
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, and Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (Drs Cairncross and Silverberg); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hotchkiss Brain Institute and Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (Dr Debert); Head Injury Clinic, Trauma & Neurosurgery Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto Canada (Dr Hunt); Hull-Ellis Concussion and Research Clinic, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network-KITE Research Institute, Toronto, Canada (Drs Bayley and Comper and Ms Chandra); Faculty of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Dr Bayley); and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Dr Comper)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Salbach NM, MacKay-Lyons M, Solomon P, Howe JA, McDonald A, Bayley MT, Veitch S, Sivarajah L, Cacoilo J, Mihailidis A. The role of theory to develop and evaluate a toolkit to increase clinical measurement and interpretation of walking speed and distance in adults post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:3719-3735. [PMID: 33459080 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1867653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The iWalk study showed that 10-meter walk test (10mWT) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) administration post-stroke increased among physical therapists (PTs) following introduction of a toolkit comprising an educational guide, mobile app, and video. We describe the use of theory guiding toolkit development and a process evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used the knowledge-to-action framework to identify research steps; and a guideline implementability framework, self-efficacy theory, and the transtheoretical model to design and evaluate the toolkit and implementation process (three learning sessions). In a before-and-after study, 37 of the 49 participating PTs completed online questionnaires to evaluate engagement with learning sessions, and rate self-efficacy to perform recommended practices pre- and post-intervention. Thirty-three PTs and 7 professional leaders participated in post-intervention focus groups and interviews, respectively. RESULTS All sites conducted learning sessions; attendance was 50-78%. Self-efficacy ratings for recommended practices increased and were significant for the 10mWT (p ≤ 0.004). Qualitative findings highlighted that theory-based toolkit features and implementation strategies likely facilitated engagement with toolkit components, contributing to observed improvements in PTs' knowledge, attitudes, skill, self-efficacy, and clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS The approach may help to inform toolkit development to advance other rehabilitation practices of similar complexity.Implications for RehabilitationToolkits are an emerging knowledge translation intervention used to support widespread implementation of clinical practice guideline recommendations.Although experts recommend using theory to inform the development of knowledge translation interventions, there is little guidance on a suitable approach.This study describes an approach to using theories, models and frameworks to design a toolkit and implementation strategy, and a process evaluation of toolkit implementation.Theory-based features of the toolkit and implementation strategy may have facilitated toolkit implementation and practice change to increase clinical measurement and interpretation of walking speed and distance in adults post-stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy M Salbach
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Patricia Solomon
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jo-Anne Howe
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Surabhi Veitch
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lavan Sivarajah
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joseph Cacoilo
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alex Mihailidis
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Patsakos EM, Craven BC, Kua A, Cheng CL, Eng J, Ho C, Noonan VK, Querée M, Bayley MT. Evaluation of the quality of published SCI clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument: Results from Can-SCIP expert panel. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S69-S78. [PMID: 34779735 PMCID: PMC8604538 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1961053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex condition with substantial adverse personal, social and economic impacts necessitating evidence-based inter-professional care. To date, limited studies have assessed the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) within SCI. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of the development process and methodological rigour of published SCI CPGs across the care continuum from pre-hospital to community-based care. METHODS Electronic health databases and indexes were searched to identify English or French language CPGs within SCI published within the last nine years with specific evidence-based recommendations applicable to the Canadian health care setting. Eligible CPGs were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS A total of forty-one CPGs that met the inclusion criteria were appraised by at least four raters. There was high variability in quality. Twenty-seven CPGs achieved a good rigour of development domain score of >70%. Other standardized mean domain scores were scope and purpose (85.32%), stakeholder involvement (65.03%), clarity of presentation (84.81%), applicability (55.55%) and editorial independence (75.83%). The agreement between appraisers (intraclass correlation coefficient) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.80). CONCLUSION There is a paucity of CPGs that address community-based specialized rehabilitation and community reintegration. Furthermore, many CPGs only focus on a single impairment at one time point in the care continuum. As SCI is a complex condition that results in multimorbidity and requires health monitoring and intervention across the lifespan, a rigorously developed CPG that addresses high-quality, interprofessional comprehensive care is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni M. Patsakos
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ailene Kua
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christiana l. Cheng
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janice Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chester Ho
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vanessa K. Noonan
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew Querée
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - the Can-SCIP Guideline Expert Panel
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nguyen C, Leung A, Lauzon A, Bayley MT, Langer LL, Luong D, Munce SEP. Examining the Relationship Between Community Integration and Mental Health Characteristics of Individuals With Childhood Acquired Neurological Disability. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:767206. [PMID: 34881213 PMCID: PMC8645559 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.767206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Many individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) or acquired brain injury (ABI) are at higher risk of lowered psychosocial functioning, poor mental health outcomes and decreased opportunities for community integration (CI) as they transition to adulthood. It is imperative to understand the characteristics of those at highest risk of dysfunction so that targeted interventions can be developed to reduce the impact. Methods: This quantitative, cross-sectional study examines current patients of the Living Independently Fully Engaged [(LIFEspan) Service], a tertiary outpatient hospital-based clinic. The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) and the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were administered to participants. Personal health information was also collected from participants' health charts, and participant interviews. Associations of sex and condition with the outcomes of screening for further assessment of depression, screening for further assessment of anxiety, and CI were calculated using t-tests and Chi-square tests. Results: 285 participants completed standardized screening tools for depression and anxiety (PHQ-4) and 283 completed the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ). Mean age was 23.4 (4.2) years; 59% were diagnosed with CP, 41% diagnosed with ABI, and 56% were male. A moderate proportion of the sample screened positive for further assessment of anxiety (28%) and depression (16%), and the overall mean score on the CIQ for the sample was 15.8 (SD 5.1). Participants that screened positive for further assessment of depression and anxiety on the PHQ-4 had lower scores on the Social Integration subscale of the CIQ (p = 0.04 and p = 0.036, respectively). Females were found to have significantly higher community integration than males (p = 0.0011) and those diagnosed with ABI were found to have significantly higher community integration than those with CP (p = 0.009), respectively. A weak negative association was found between age for the total sample and overall PHQ-4 score (p = 0.0417). Presence of an intellectual or learning disability/challenge was associated with a lower CIQ score (p = 0.0026). Conclusions: This current study, highlights the need for further research to explore the unique needs and barriers faced by this population. This study may inform assessments and interventions to support the mental health and community integration of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Nguyen
- Department of Occupational Therapy & Occupational Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abigail Leung
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Lauzon
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura L Langer
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dorothy Luong
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah E P Munce
- Department of Occupational Therapy & Occupational Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Duncan A, Luong D, Perrier L, Bayley MT, Andrew G, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, Chan B, Curran CJ, Dimitropoulos G, Hartman L, Huang L, Kastner M, Kingsnorth S, McCormick A, Nelson M, Nicholas D, Penner M, Thompson L, Toulany A, Woo A, Zee J, Munce SEP. Prioritizing a Research Agenda of Transitional Care Interventions for Childhood-Onset Disabilities. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:682078. [PMID: 34589448 PMCID: PMC8475648 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.682078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Transitional care interventions have the potential to optimize continuity of care, improve health outcomes and enhance quality of life for adolescents and young adults living with chronic childhood-onset disabilities, including neurodevelopmental disorders, as they transition to adult health and social care services. The paucity of research in this area poses challenges in identifying and implementing interventions for research, evaluation and implementation. The purpose of this project was to advance this research agenda by identifying the transitional care interventions from the scientific literature and prioritize interventions for study. A modified-Delphi approach involving two rounds of online surveys followed by a face-to-face consensus meeting with knowledge users, researchers and clinician experts in transitional care (n = 19) was used. A subsequent virtual meeting concluded the formulation of next steps. Experts rated 16 categories of interventions, derived from a systematic review, on importance, impact, and feasibility. Seven of the 16 interventions categories received a mean score rating of ≥7 (out of 10) on all three rating categories. Participants then rank ordered the reduced list of seven interventions in order of priority and the top four ranked interventions advanced for further discussion at a consensus meeting. Using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist as a guide, the participants identified that a study of a peer system navigator was worthy of future evaluation. This study highlighted that transitional care interventions are complex and multifaceted. However, the presence of a peer to support system navigation, advocacy and individual and family education was considered the most ideal intervention addressing the current gap in care. Future research, which aims to engage patients and families in a co-design approach, is recommended to further develop this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Duncan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dorothy Luong
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- University of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Physical Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gail Andrew
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Kelly Arbour-Nicitopoulos
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Chan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C J Curran
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura Hartman
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lennox Huang
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Monika Kastner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shauna Kingsnorth
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna McCormick
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Nelson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Nicholas
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Melanie Penner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Thompson
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alene Toulany
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amanda Woo
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joanne Zee
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah E P Munce
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Silverberg ND, Iverson GL, Arciniegas DB, Bayley MT, Bazarian JJ, Bell KR, Broglio SP, Cifu D, Davis GA, Dvorak J, Echemendia RJ, Gioia GA, Giza CC, Hinds SR, Katz DI, Kurowski BG, Leddy JJ, Le Sage N, Lumba-Brown A, Maas AI, Manley GT, McCrea M, McCrory P, Menon DK, Putukian M, Suskauer SJ, van der Naalt J, Walker WC, Yeates KO, Zafonte R, Zasler N, Zemek R, Brown J, Cogan A, Dams-O’Connor K, Delmonico R, Park Graf MJ, Iaccarino MA, Kajankova M, Kamins J, McCulloch KL, McKinney G, Nagele D, Panenka WJ, Rabinowitz AR, Reed N, Wethe JV, Whitehair V. Expert Panel Survey to Update the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Definition of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 102:76-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
26
|
Patsakos EM, Bayley MT, Kua A, Cheng C, Eng J, Ho C, Noonan VK, Querée M, Craven BC. Development of the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline: Methods and overview. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S52-S68. [PMID: 34779719 PMCID: PMC8604491 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1953312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-altering injury that leads to a complex constellation of changes in an individual's sensory, motor, and autonomic function which is largely determined by the level and severity of cord impairment. Available SCI-specific clinical practice guidelines (CPG) address specific impairments, health conditions or a segment of the care continuum, however, fail to address all the important clinical questions arising throughout an individual's care journey. To address this gap, an interprofessional panel of experts in SCI convened to develop the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline. This article provides an overview of the methods underpinning the Can-SCIP Guideline process. METHODS The Can-SCIP Guideline was developed using the Guidelines Adaptation Cycle. A comprehensive search for existing SCI-specific CPGs was conducted. The quality of eligible CPGs was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. An expert panel (n = 52) convened, and groups of relevant experts met to review and recommend adoption or refinement of existing recommendations or develop new recommendations based on evidence from systematic reviews conducted by the Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence (SCIRE) team. The expert panel voted to approve selected recommendations using an online survey tool. RESULTS The Can-SCIP Guideline includes 585 total recommendations from 41 guidelines, 96 recommendations that pertain to the Components of the Ideal SCI Care System section, and 489 recommendations that pertain to the Management of Secondary Health Conditions section. Most recommendations (n = 281, 48%) were adopted from existing guidelines without revision, 215 (36.8%) recommendations were revised for application in a Canadian context, and 89 recommendations (15.2%) were created de novo. CONCLUSION The Can-SCIP Guideline is the first living comprehensive guideline for adults with SCI in Canada across the care continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni M. Patsakos
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ailene Kua
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christiana Cheng
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janice Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physiotherapy, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chester Ho
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vanessa K. Noonan
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew Querée
- GF Strong Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Levy BB, Song JZ, Luong D, Perrier L, Bayley MT, Andrew G, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, Chan B, Curran CJ, Dimitropoulos G, Hartman L, Huang L, Kastner M, Kingsnorth S, McCormick A, Nelson M, Nicholas D, Penner M, Thompson L, Toulany A, Woo A, Zee J, Munce SEP. Transitional Care Interventions for Youth With Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2020; 146:peds.2020-0187. [PMID: 33046586 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-0187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Transition from the pediatric to the adult health care system is a complex process that should include medical, psychosocial, educational, recreational, and vocational considerations. OBJECTIVE In this systematic review, we aim to synthesize the evidence on transitional care interventions (TCIs) to improve the quality of life (QoL) for adolescents and young adults with childhood-onset disabilities, including neurodevelopmental disorders. DATA SOURCES Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched. STUDY SELECTION In the included studies, researchers examined TCIs for adolescents and young adults (12-24 years of age) with childhood-onset disabilities. Studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies published in the last 26 years. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently completed study screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. RESULTS Fifty-two studies were included. Five studies reported on QoL, but statistically significant improvements were noted in only 1 of these studies. Significant improvements were also found in secondary outcomes including disability-related knowledge and transitional readiness. TCIs targeted patients, families and/or caregivers, and health care providers and exhibited great heterogeneity in their characteristics and components. LIMITATIONS Inconsistent reporting on interventions between studies hindered synthesis of the relationships between specific intervention characteristics and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Although there is limited evidence on the impact of TCIs on the QoL for youth with childhood-onset disabilities, there is indication that they can be effective in improving patient and provider outcomes. The initiation of transition-focused care at an early age may contribute to improved long-term health outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben B Levy
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Z Song
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dorothy Luong
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and.,Division of Physical Medicine, and
| | - Gail Andrew
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kelly Arbour-Nicitopoulos
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, and.,Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Chan
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and
| | - Cynthia J Curran
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Laura Hartman
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lennox Huang
- Departments of Paediatrics.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika Kastner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and.,Family and Community Medicine, and.,North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shauna Kingsnorth
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, and.,Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna McCormick
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and
| | - Michelle Nelson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and.,Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Nicholas
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Melanie Penner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and.,Departments of Paediatrics.,Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Thompson
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alene Toulany
- Departments of Paediatrics.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Woo
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Zee
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and
| | - Sarah E P Munce
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; .,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, and.,Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Silverberg ND, Panenka WJ, Lizotte PP, Bayley MT, Dance D, Li LC. Promoting early treatment for mild traumatic brain injury in primary care with a guideline implementation tool: a pilot cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035527. [PMID: 33082178 PMCID: PMC7577038 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES New clinical practice guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) emphasise that family physicians should proactively screen and initiate treatment for depression/anxiety, insomnia and headaches. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering an implementation intervention to family physicians. DESIGN Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING Specialty outpatient clinic (recruitment) and primary care (implementation). PARTICIPANTS 114 primary care clinics were randomised. These clinics were associated with 137 unique family physicians caring for 148 adult patients who sustained an mTBI within the previous 3 months and were seeking care for persistent symptoms. INTERVENTIONS Patients completed self-report screening measures for depression/anxiety, insomnia and headaches. A tailored letter that incorporates the patient's screening test results and associated treatment algorithms was sent to their family physician (or walk-in clinic). Physicians at clinics assigned to the control condition received a generic letter, without the screening test results. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility outcomes included the frequency of primary care follow-up, retention rates and reliability of patient recall of their physicians' actions (primary mechanistic outcome). The primary efficacy outcome was the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire (RPQ). RESULTS Most patients (97.8%; 128 of 131) followed up at the primary care clinic they planned to. Retention rates were 88% (131 of 148) and 78% (116 of 148) at the 1-month and 3-month assessments, respectively. Agreement between patient recall of their physicians' actions and medical chart audits was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.48-0.65). Patients in the experimental group reported fewer symptoms on the RPQ compared with those in the control group, whose physician received a general letter (B=-4.0, 95% CI: -7.3 to -0.7). CONCLUSIONS A larger trial will need to address minor feasibility challenges to evaluate the effectiveness of this guideline implementation tool for improving mTBI clinical outcomes and confirm the mechanism(s) of intervention benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03221218.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah D Silverberg
- Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - William J Panenka
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Neuropsychiatry Program, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pierre-Paul Lizotte
- Department of Family Medicine, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Center, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derry Dance
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Acquired Brain Injury Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Linda C Li
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, Liu-Ambrose T, Pooyania S, Poulin MJ, Schneeberg A, Yao J, Eng JJ. Higher Doses Improve Walking Recovery During Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation. Stroke 2020; 51:2639-2648. [PMID: 32811378 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.029245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We investigated the effect of higher therapeutic exercise doses on walking during inpatient rehabilitation, typically commencing 1 to 4 weeks poststroke. METHODS This phase II, blinded-assessor, randomized controlled trial recruited from 6 Canadian inpatient rehabilitation units, between 2014 and 2018. Subjects (n=75; 25/group) were randomized into: control (usual care) physical therapy: typically, 1 hour, 5 days/week; Determining Optimal Post-Stroke Exercise (DOSE1): 1 hour, 5 days/week, more than double the intensity of Control (based on aerobic minutes and walking steps); and DOSE2: 2 hours, 5 days/week, more than quadruple the intensity of Control, each for 4 weeks duration. The primary outcome, walking endurance at completion of the 4-week intervention (post-evaluation), was compared across these groups using linear regression. Secondary outcomes at post-evaluation, and longitudinal outcomes at 6 and 12-month evaluations, were also analyzed. RESULTS Both DOSE1 (mean change 61 m [95% CI, 9-113], P=0.02) and DOSE2 (mean change 58 m, 6-110, P=0.03) demonstrated greater walking endurance compared with Control at the post-evaluation. Significant improvements were also observed with DOSE2 in gait speed (5-m walk), and both DOSE groups in quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L) compared with Control. Longitudinal analyses revealed that improvements in walking endurance from the DOSE intervention were retained during the 1-year follow-up period over usual care. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first preliminary evidence that patients with stroke can improve their walking recovery and quality of life with higher doses of aerobic and stepping activity within a critical time period for neurological recovery. Furthermore, walking endurance benefits achieved from a 4-week intervention are retained over the first-year poststroke. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01915368.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara D Klassen
- Department of Physical Therapy (T.D.K., T.L.-A., A.S., J.J.E.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sean P Dukelow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute (S.P.D., M.D.H.)University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Canada (M.T.B.)
| | - Oscar Benavente
- Division of Neurology (O.B.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute (S.P.D., M.D.H.)University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Andrei Krassioukov
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (A.K., J.Y.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Teresa Liu-Ambrose
- Department of Physical Therapy (T.D.K., T.L.-A., A.S., J.J.E.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sepideh Pooyania
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba (S.P.)
| | - Marc J Poulin
- Department of Physiology & Pharmacology (M.J.P.) University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Amy Schneeberg
- Department of Physical Therapy (T.D.K., T.L.-A., A.S., J.J.E.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yao
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (A.K., J.Y.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy (T.D.K., T.L.-A., A.S., J.J.E.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bayley MT, Kirby RL, Farahani F, Titus L, Smith C, Routhier F, Gagnon DH, Stapleford P, Alavinia SM, Craven BC. Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:130-140. [PMID: 31573457 PMCID: PMC6783799 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Wheeled mobility is critical for individuals with Spinal Cord Injury or Disease (SCI/D) related paralysis. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines highlighting eight steps in wheelchair service delivery: (1) referral and appointment; (2) assessment; (3) prescription; (4) funding and ordering; (5) product preparation; (6) fitting; (7) user training; and, (8) follow-up maintenance/repairs. This article describes the processes used to develop structure, process and outcome indicators that reflect the WHO guidelines within the Domain of Wheeled Mobility rehabilitation for Canadians. Methods: Wheeled mobility experts within the SCI-High Project Team used the WHO guideline to inform the Construct refinement and development of a Driver diagram. Following seven meetings, the Driver diagram and review of outcome measures and literature synthesis regarding wheelchair service delivery informed indicator selection and group consensus. Results: The structure indicator examines the proportion of SCI/D service providers within a rehabilitation program who have specialized wheelchair training to ensure prescription, preparation, fitting, and maintenance quality. The process indicator evaluates the average number of hours of wheelchair service delivery provided per patient during rehabilitation. The intermediary outcome indicator (rehabilitation discharge), is a target capacity score on the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). The final outcome indicators (at 18 months post rehabilitation admission) are the Life Space Assessment (LSA) and the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale (WheelCon) short form mean scores. Conclusion: Routine implementation of the selected Wheeled Mobility structure, process and outcome indicators should measurably advance care within the Wheeled Mobility Domain for Canadians living with SCI/D by 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T. Bayley
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R. Lee Kirby
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Titus
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cher Smith
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - François Routhier
- Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Dany H. Gagnon
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Patricia Stapleford
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, Neural Engineering & Therapeutic Team, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute- University Health Network, 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON, Canada, M4G 3V9; Ph: (416) 597-3422.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Craven BC, Alavinia SM, Wiest MJ, Farahani F, Hitzig SL, Flett H, Jeyathevan G, Omidvar M, Bayley MT. Methods for development of structure, process and outcome indicators for prioritized spinal cord injury rehabilitation Domains: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:51-67. [PMID: 31573444 PMCID: PMC6781197 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: High-quality rehabilitation care following spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) is critical for optimizing neurorecovery and long-term health outcomes. This manuscript describes the methods used for developing, refining, and implementing a framework of structure, process, and outcome indicators that reflect high-quality rehabilitation among adults with SCI/D in Canada. Methods: This quality improvement initiative was comprised of the following processes: (1) prioritization of care Domains by key stakeholders (scientists, clinicians, therapists, patients and stakeholder organizations); (2) assembly of 11 Domain-specific Working Groups including 69 content experts; (3) conduct of literature searches, guideline and best practice reviews, and outcome synthesis by the Project Team; (4) refinement of Domain aim and construct definitions; (5) conduct of cause and effect analysis using Driver diagrams; (6) selection and development of structure, process and outcome indicators; (7) piloting and feasibility analysis of indicators and associated evaluation tools; and, (8) dissemination of the proposed indicators. Result: The Project Team established aims, constructs and related structure, process, and outcome indicators to facilitate uniform measurement and benchmarking across 11 Domains of rehabilitation, at admission and for 18 months thereafter, among adult Canadians by 2020. Conclusion: These processes led to the selection of a feasible set of indicators that once implemented should ensure that adults with SCI/D receive timely, safe, and effective rehabilitation services. These indicators can be used to assess health system performance, monitor the quality of care within and across rehabilitation settings, and evaluate the rehabilitation outcomes of the population to ultimately enhance healthcare quality and equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Catharine Craven
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, B. Catharine Craven, KITE – Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, 206-H 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4G3V9; Ph: 416-597-3422 x6122.
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matheus J. Wiest
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sander L. Hitzig
- St. John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Flett
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Departmenet of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gaya Jeyathevan
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wiest MJ, West C, Ditor D, Furlan JC, Miyatani M, Farahani F, Alavinia SM, Oh PI, Bayley MT, Craven BC. Development of Cardiometabolic Health indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:166-175. [PMID: 31573456 PMCID: PMC6781462 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1613322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) leads to unchanged low-density lipoprotein and cholesterol, very low high-density lipoprotein a form of dyslipidemia and physical inactivity which combine to increase risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiometabolic disease. Herein, we describe the selection of structure, process and outcome indicators for adults in the first 18 months post-SCI/D rehabilitation admission. Methods: A Pan-Canadian Cardiometabolic Health Working Group was formed to develop a construct definition. Cardiometabolic risk factors were summarized in a Driver diagram. Release of the Paralyzed Veterans of America "Identification and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk after Spinal Cord Injury" and the International Scientific Exercise Guidelines: "Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury", informed the group's focus on prevention strategies to advance this Domain of rehabilitation admission. Results: The structure indicator identifies during rehabilitation the presence of appropriate time and resources for physical exercise prescription. Process indicators are lipid profile assessment at rehabilitation admission and documented exercise prescriptions prior to discharge. The outcome indicators track patient's knowledge retention regarding exercise prescription at discharge, current exercise adherence and lipid status 18 months after rehabilitation discharge. Conclusion: Routine national implementation of these indicators at the specified time points will enhance efforts to detect dyslipidemia and assure routine participation in endurance exercise. These indicators align with international initiatives to improve cardiometabolic health through interventions targeting modifiable risk factors specifically endurance exercising and optimal lipid profiles, crucial to augmenting cardiometabolic health after SCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheus J. Wiest
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher West
- Cell & Physiological Sciences, Southern Medical Program, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada,ICORD, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David Ditor
- Faculty of Applied Health Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julio C. Furlan
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Masae Miyatani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul I. Oh
- Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, Neural Engineering & Therapeutic Team, KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; Ph: (416) 597-3422 (ext: 6122).
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Levy BB, Luong D, Perrier L, Bayley MT, Munce SEP. Peer support interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, and spina bifida: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:288. [PMID: 31068184 PMCID: PMC6505073 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4110-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Neurological disorders may negatively impact community integration and/or quality of life. Peer support has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance patients’ efficacy in managing their own health. This review examines the key characteristics and impact of peer support interventions for adults with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, and spina bifida on community integration and quality of life. Methods Eligible studies reported on peer support interventions for adults (16 years of age or older) with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida. Only randomized controlled trials published in English in the last 10 years were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were used to conduct the literature search. Two reviewers independently screened studies, abstracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (for individual study elements and overall) using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results The systematic review included 6 trials reporting on acquired brain injury only. Of these studies, 4 reported on stroke and 2 reported on traumatic brain injury. Two studies found significant improvements in quality of life following peer support. No studies reported significant results on community integration. Considerable heterogeneity existed in the key characteristics of interventions. Conclusions There are a limited number of studies on the impact of peer support interventions for adults with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida on community integration and quality of life. Standardization of key intervention characteristics may aid the global adoption of peer support as a formalized, evidence-based practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4110-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben B Levy
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Centre, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Dorothy Luong
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, 345 Rumsey Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 1R7, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- University of Toronto Libraries, 130 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A5, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Centre, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Sarah E P Munce
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, 345 Rumsey Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 1R7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Munce SEP, Jaglal S, Kastner M, Nelson MLA, Salbach NM, Shepherd J, Sweet SN, Wilcock R, Thoms C, Bayley MT. Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support Program: a mixed methods protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e023367. [PMID: 30904839 PMCID: PMC6475259 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study is to conduct a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Ontario Brain Injury Association (OBIA) Peer Support Program. The RCT is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and dose-response of the Peer Support Program in improving participation and mood for people with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury compared with a wait-list control group. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The proposed research is a three-phase, mixed methods pilot RCT. Consistent with an integrated knowledge translation approach, the study design has been informed in consultation with the knowledge user (ie, OBIA). It will include an initial qualitative examination of barriers and enablers to the trial implementation (phase 1), a pilot RCT (phase 2) and conclude with a qualitative component (phase 3). A qualitative descriptive approach will be adopted for both qualitative phases of the study (n=20-25) and thematic analysis will be used. The 6 months phase-2 trial will be conducted with 60 participants. These participants will be randomised to one of three groups: a twice a week programme (n=20), a once a week programme (n=20) or the wait-list control group (n=20). The feasibility of participant recruitment and retention, data collection, as well as participant adherence to the OBIA Peer Support Program will be evaluated. The primary outcome measure will be participation, as measured by the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective. Other proposed outcomes of interest will include mood, health-related quality of life and self-efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval will be obtained from the principal author's institution (University Health Network Research Ethics Board). The results of this study will inform the development of a larger scale RCT and will inform future iterations of the OBIA Peer Support Program including a revised programme curriculum. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03450460; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E P Munce
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Jaglal
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michelle L A Nelson
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Shepherd
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shane N Sweet
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruth Wilcock
- Ontario Brain Injury Association, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carla Thoms
- Ontario Brain Injury Association, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, Liu-Ambrose T, Pooyania S, Poulin MJ, Yao J, Eng JJ. Determining optimal poststroke exercise: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating therapeutic intensity and dose on functional recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Int J Stroke 2019; 14:80-86. [PMID: 30010509 DOI: 10.1177/1747493018785064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE A top priority in stroke rehabilitation research is determining the appropriate exercise dose to optimize recovery. Although more intensive rehabilitation very early after stroke may be deleterious to recovery, inpatient rehabilitation, occurring after acute care, may be a more appropriate setting to assess therapeutic dose on neurological recovery. HYPOTHESIS Individuals receiving higher intensity and dose exercise programs will yield greater improvements in walking ability over usual inpatient physical therapy care. METHODS AND DESIGN Seventy-five individuals across seven inpatient rehabilitation sites in Canada will be randomized into one of three treatment programs, each 5 days/week, for four weeks and monitored for exertion (heart rate) and repetitions (step count). STUDY OUTCOMES The primary outcome measure is the 6 min walk and secondary outcomes include functional independence, cognitive, and quality-of-life measures. Outcome data will be assessed at four time points. SUMMARY This trial will contribute to our knowledge of the therapeutic intensity and dose necessary to maximize functional recovery at a very important stage of rehabilitation and neural recovery poststroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara D Klassen
- 1 Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- 2 Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sean P Dukelow
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- 4 Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Oscar Benavente
- 5 Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- 6 Department of Community Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Andrei Krassioukov
- 7 Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- 8 International Collaboration on Repair Discovery (ICORD), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Teresa Liu-Ambrose
- 9 Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- 10 Aging, Mobility and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sepideh Pooyania
- 11 Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Marc J Poulin
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- 12 Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- 15 O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yao
- 2 Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
- 7 Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- 2 Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
- 9 Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Munce SEP, Perrier L, Shin S, Adhihetty C, Pitzul K, Nelson MLA, Bayley MT. Impact of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life of individuals post-stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 42:1055-1061. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1512163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E. P. Munce
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Saeha Shin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Chamila Adhihetty
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristen Pitzul
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michelle L. A. Nelson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Sinai Health System, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ma Z, Bayley MT, Perrier L, Dhir P, Dépatie L, Comper P, Ruttan L, Lay C, Munce SEP. The association between adverse childhood experiences and adult traumatic brain injury/concussion: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 41:1360-1366. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1424957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zechen Ma
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Priya Dhir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Paul Comper
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lesley Ruttan
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christine Lay
- Centre for Headache, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sarah E. P. Munce
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ma Z, Bayley MT, Perrier L, Dhir P, Dépatie L, Comper P, Ruttan L, Munce SE. The association between adverse childhood experiences and traumatic brain injury/concussion in adulthood: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e018425. [PMID: 29025849 PMCID: PMC5652488 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is a significant risk factor for physical and mental illnesses later in life. Concussion or traumatic brain injury is a challenging condition where preinjury factors may interact to affect recovery. The association between ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion is not well mapped in any previous reviews of the literature. Using a scoping review methodology, the research question that will be addressed is: what is known from the existing literature about the association between ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion in adults? METHODS AND ANALYSIS The methodological frameworks outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al will be used. All original studies in English published since 2007 investigating ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion outcomes will be included with no limitations on study type. Literature search strategies will be developed using medical subject headings and text words related to ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussions. Multiple electronic databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts for full-text review and full texts for final inclusion. Two independent reviewers will extract data on study characteristics for ACE exposure and traumatic brain injury/concussion outcomes. Extracted data will be summarised quantitatively using numerical counts and qualitatively using thematic analysis. DISSEMINATION This review will identify knowledge gaps on the associations between ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion and promote further research. Knowledge translation will occur throughout the review process with dissemination of project findings to stakeholders at the local, national and international levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zechen Ma
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Priya Dhir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lana Dépatie
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Comper
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lesley Ruttan
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Ep Munce
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Munce SEP, Perrier L, Shin S, Adhihetty C, Pitzul K, Nelson MLA, Bayley MT. Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017; 6:184. [PMID: 28882175 PMCID: PMC5590115 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While many outcomes post-stroke (e.g., depression) have been previously investigated, there is no complete data on the impact of a variety of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals post-stroke. The current paper outlines a systematic review protocol on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life as well as physical and psychological well-being of individuals with stroke. METHODS MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. Only randomized controlled trials that report on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life outcomes in people with stroke will be included. The secondary outcomes will be physical and psychological well-being. Quality improvement strategies include audit and feedback, case management, team changes, electronic patient registries, clinician education, clinical reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information to clinicians, patient education, (promotion of) self-management, patient reminder systems, and continuous quality improvement. Studies published since 2000 will be included to increase the relevancy of findings. Results will be grouped according to the target group of the varying quality improvement strategies (i.e., health system, health care professionals, or patients) and/or by any other noteworthy grouping variables, such as etiology of stroke or by sex. DISCUSSION This systematic review will identify those quality improvement strategies aimed at the health system, health care professionals, and patients that impact the quality of life of individuals with stroke. Improving awareness and utilization of such strategies may enhance uptake of stroke best practices and reduce inappropriate health care utilization costs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42017064141.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E P Munce
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of Toronto, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada.
| | - Laure Perrier
- University of Toronto, Gerstein Science Information Centre, 9 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A5, Canada
| | - Saeha Shin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Chamila Adhihetty
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Kristen Pitzul
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada.,Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Sinai Health System, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, Ontario, M4M 2B5, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of Toronto, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Klassen TD, Semrau JA, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Hill MD, Eng JJ. Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitor as a Practical Way to Measure Walking Intensity During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke 2017; 48:2614-2617. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.018175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tara D. Klassen
- From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (T.D.K., J.J.E.); University of Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada (M.T.B.)
| | - Jennifer A. Semrau
- From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (T.D.K., J.J.E.); University of Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada (M.T.B.)
| | - Sean P. Dukelow
- From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (T.D.K., J.J.E.); University of Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada (M.T.B.)
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (T.D.K., J.J.E.); University of Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada (M.T.B.)
| | - Michael D. Hill
- From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (T.D.K., J.J.E.); University of Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada (M.T.B.)
| | - Janice J. Eng
- From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (T.D.K., J.J.E.); University of Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada (J.A.S., S.P.D., M.D.H.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Canada (M.T.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) was a Phase 3 randomized trial with over 2100 subjects post stroke that had unexpected results with better outcomes for usual care than those receiving very early mobilization. This review of published stroke clinical practice guidelines highlights that recommendations for mobilization have changed after publication of AVERT but also that developers have struggled to provide recommendations for appropriate dose, duration and intensity of mobilization in the acute post stroke period with available analyses from AVERT and other literature. This review highlights the priority research questions about early rehabilitation post stroke that need to be addressed through future large scale randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T Bayley
- 1 Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,2 Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Audrey Bowen
- 3 Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester MAHSC, Manchester, UK
| | - Coralie English
- 4 School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Robert Teasell
- 5 Lawson Health Research Institute, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- 6 Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia and GF Strong Rehab Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Salbach NM, Wood-Dauphinee S, Desrosiers J, Eng JJ, Graham ID, Jaglal SB, Korner-Bitensky N, MacKay-Lyons M, Mayo NE, Richards CL, Teasell RW, Zwarenstein M, Bayley MT. Facilitated interprofessional implementation of a physical rehabilitation guideline for stroke in inpatient settings: process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci 2017; 12:100. [PMID: 28764752 PMCID: PMC5539742 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0631-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation by Evidence-Implementation Trial (SCORE-IT) showed that a facilitated knowledge translation (KT) approach to implementing a stroke rehabilitation guideline was more likely than passive strategies to improve functional walking capacity, but not gross manual dexterity, among patients in rehabilitation hospitals. This paper presents the results of a planned process evaluation designed to assess whether the type and number of recommended treatments implemented by stroke teams in each group would help to explain the results related to patient outcomes. Methods As part of a cluster randomized trial, 20 rehabilitation units were stratified by language and allocated to a facilitated or passive KT intervention group. Sites in the facilitated group received the guideline with treatment protocols and funding for a part-time nurse and therapist facilitator who attended a 2-day training workshop and promoted guideline implementation for 16 months. Sites in the passive group received the guideline excluding treatment protocols. As part of a process evaluation, nurses, and occupational and physical therapists, blinded to study hypotheses, were asked to record their implementation of 18 recommended treatments targeting motor function, postural control and mobility using individualized patient checklists after treatment sessions for 2 weeks pre- and post-intervention. The percentage of patients receiving each treatment pre- and post-intervention and between groups was compared after adjusting for clustering and covariates in a random-effects logistic regression analysis. Results Data on treatment implementation from nine and eight sites in the facilitated and passive KT group, respectively, were available for analysis. The facilitated KT intervention was associated with improved implementation of sit-to-stand (p = 0.028) and walking (p = 0.043) training while the passive KT intervention was associated with improved implementation of standing balance training (p = 0.037), after adjusting for clustering at patient and provider levels and covariates. Conclusions Despite multiple strategies and resources, the facilitated KT intervention was unsuccessful in improving integration of 18 treatments concurrently. The facilitated approach may not have adequately addressed barriers to integrating numerous treatments simultaneously and complex treatments that were unfamiliar to providers. Trial registration Unique identifier-NCT00359593 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0631-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy M Salbach
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada. .,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, room 3-131 (3-East) 3rd Floor University Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.
| | - Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada
| | - Johanne Desrosiers
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue nord, Bureau FM-2208, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Cres, Ottawa, K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Susan B Jaglal
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Nicol Korner-Bitensky
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada
| | - Marilyn MacKay-Lyons
- School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Office 405 Forrest Building, 5869 University Avenue, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Nancy E Mayo
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Division of Geriatrics, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital Site, Ross Pavilion R4.29, 687 Pine Ave W, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada
| | - Carol L Richards
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval and Centre de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec (IRDPQ) Site Hamel, 525 Boul. Wilfrid-Hamel Est, Québec, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada
| | - Robert W Teasell
- Parkwood Institute, 550 Wellington Road, London, ON, N6C 0A7, Canada
| | - Merrick Zwarenstein
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, room 3-131 (3-East) 3rd Floor University Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Munce SEP, Graham ID, Salbach NM, Jaglal SB, Richards CL, Eng JJ, Desrosiers J, MacKay-Lyons M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE, Teasell RW, Zwarenstein M, Mokry J, Black S, Bayley MT. Perspectives of health care professionals on the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a stroke rehabilitation guidelines cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2017. [PMID: 28651530 PMCID: PMC5485614 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2389-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation by Evidence Implementation Trial (SCORE-IT) was a cluster randomized controlled trial that evaluated two knowledge translation (KT) interventions for the promotion of the uptake of best practice recommendations for interventions targeting upper and lower extremity function, postural control, and mobility. Twenty rehabilitation centers across Canada were randomly assigned to either the facilitated or passive KT intervention. The objective of the current study was to understand the factors influencing the implementation of the recommended treatments and KT interventions from the perspective of nurses, occupational therapists and physical therapists, and clinical managers following completion of the trial. Methods A qualitative descriptive approach involving focus groups was used. Thematic analysis was used to understand the factors influencing the implementation of the recommended treatments and KT interventions. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Framework for Improvement guided the analysis. Results Thirty-three participants were interviewed from 11 of the 20 study sites (6 sites from the facilitated KT arm and 5 sites from the passive KT arm). The following factors influencing the implementation of the recommended treatments and KT interventions emerged: facilitation, agreement with the intervention – practical, familiarity with the recommended treatments, and environmental factors, including time and resources. Each of these themes includes the sub-themes of facilitator and/or barrier. Improved team communication and interdisciplinary collaboration emerged as an unintended outcome of the trial across both arms in addition to a facilitator to the implementation of the treatment recommendations. Facilitation was identified as a facilitator to implementation of the KT interventions in the passive KT intervention arm despite the lack of formally instituted facilitators in this arm of the trial. Conclusions This is one of the first studies to examine the factors influencing the implementation of stroke recommendations and associated KT interventions within the context of a trial. Findings highlight the important role of self-selected facilitators to implementation efforts. Future research should seek to better understand the specific characteristics of facilitators that are associated with successful implementation and clinical outcomes, especially within the context of stroke rehabilitation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2389-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E P Munce
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada.
| | - Ian D Graham
- Centre for Practice-Changing Research, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 711, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Susan B Jaglal
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Carol L Richards
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval and Centre de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale (CIRRIS), Québec City, Quebec, Canada.,Institut de Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Québec (IRDPQ) Site Hamel, 525 Boul. Wilfrid-Hamel Est, Québec City, Quebec, G1M 2S8, Canada
| | - Janice J Eng
- University of British Columbia, 212 - 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Johanne Desrosiers
- Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, 3001, 12e avenue nord, Bureau FM-2208, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Marilyn MacKay-Lyons
- Office 405 Forrest Building, School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, PO Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1Y5, Canada
| | - Nicol Korner-Bitensky
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1Y5, Canada
| | - Nancy E Mayo
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Division of Geriatrics, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital Site, Ross Pavilion R4.29, 687 Pine Ave West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada
| | - Robert W Teasell
- Parkwood Institute, 550 Wellington Road, London, Ontario, N6C 0A7, Canada
| | - Merrick Zwarenstein
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 1151 Richmond St, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Jennifer Mokry
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Sandra Black
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room A4 21, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Neuro Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, room 3-131 (3-East) 3rd Floor University Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Medical comorbidities in stroke patients influence acute mortality, but may also affect participation of survivors in rehabilitation. There is limited research investigating the impact of comorbidities on stroke rehabilitation outcomes. The review will explore the literature on the impact of comorbidities on stroke rehabilitation outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS The literature was searched systematically, including MEDLINE database, EMBASE and PsychINFO, combining variations of the terms stroke, rehabilitation and comorbidities. Results were limited to English language publications. Included studies had a functional outcome. RESULTS Twenty relevant articles were identified. Fifteen small prospective or large retrospective studies using global comorbidity scales produced conflicting relationships between comorbidities and rehabilitation outcomes. Five publications addressed specific comorbidities, with three studies finding negative correlation between diabetes and rehabilitation outcomes, although effects diminished with age. In general, there were discrepancies in how comorbidities were identified. Few studies specifically focused on comorbidities and/or rehabilitation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of comorbidities on stroke rehabilitation outcomes. However, the presence of more severe diabetes may be associated with worse outcomes. The role of comorbidities in stroke rehabilitation would be best clarified with a large cohort study, with precise comorbidity identification measured against rehabilitation specific outcomes. Implications for rehabilitation Benefit of rehabilitation after stroke in improving functional outcome is well-established. Many stroke patients have comorbid conditions which can impact rehabilitation participation, leading to less benefit obtained from rehabilitation. The burden of comorbid conditions may slow rehabilitation progress, which may warrant a longer duration of rehabilitation to obtain required functional gain to be discharged into the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan K H Tam
- a Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- a Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hall RE, Fang J, Hodwitz K, Saposnik G, Bayley MT. Does the Volume of Ischemic Stroke Admissions Relate to Clinical Outcomes in the Ontario Stroke System? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016; 8:S141-7. [PMID: 26515202 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.115.002079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Better outcomes have been found among hospitals treating higher volumes of patients for specific surgical and medical conditions. We examined hospital ischemic stroke (IS) volume and 30-day mortality to inform regionalization planning. METHODS AND RESULTS Using a population-based hospital discharge administrative database (2005/2006 to 2011/2012), average annual IS patient volumes were calculated for 162 Ontario acute hospitals. Hospitals were ranked and classified as small (<126), medium (126-202), and large (>202). Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of death within 7 and 30 days to account for the homogeneity in outcomes for patients treated at the same hospital. Overall, 73 368 patients were hospitalized for IS, and 30-day mortality was 15.3%. The mean (±SD) of annual hospitalizations for IS was 29 (31) for small-volume hospitals, 156 (20) for medium-volume hospitals, and 300 (78) for high-volume hospitals. High-volume hospitals admitted younger patients (mean [±SD] age, 73.0 [13.9] years) compared with medium- and small-volume hospitals (74.0 [13.2] and 75.5 [12.5] years, respectively; P<0.0001). Patients at small-volume hospitals were more likely than patients at high-volume hospitals to die at 30 days after an acute IS (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.65). CONCLUSIONS Hospital IS volume is associated with 30-day mortality in Ontario. Patients admitted to hospitals with annual IS volumes <126 annually are more likely to die within 30 days than patients admitted to hospitals that see on average 300 patients annually. This finding supports centralizing care in stroke-specialized hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Hall
- From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (R.E.H., J.F., G.S., M.T.B.); Ontario Stroke Network (R.E.H., M.T.B.); College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (K.H.); Department of Medicine, University of Toronto (G.S., M.T.B.); St. Michael's Hospital (G.S.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Hospital Network (M.T.B.); Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jiming Fang
- From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (R.E.H., J.F., G.S., M.T.B.); Ontario Stroke Network (R.E.H., M.T.B.); College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (K.H.); Department of Medicine, University of Toronto (G.S., M.T.B.); St. Michael's Hospital (G.S.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Hospital Network (M.T.B.); Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathryn Hodwitz
- From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (R.E.H., J.F., G.S., M.T.B.); Ontario Stroke Network (R.E.H., M.T.B.); College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (K.H.); Department of Medicine, University of Toronto (G.S., M.T.B.); St. Michael's Hospital (G.S.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Hospital Network (M.T.B.); Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gustavo Saposnik
- From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (R.E.H., J.F., G.S., M.T.B.); Ontario Stroke Network (R.E.H., M.T.B.); College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (K.H.); Department of Medicine, University of Toronto (G.S., M.T.B.); St. Michael's Hospital (G.S.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Hospital Network (M.T.B.); Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (R.E.H., J.F., G.S., M.T.B.); Ontario Stroke Network (R.E.H., M.T.B.); College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (K.H.); Department of Medicine, University of Toronto (G.S., M.T.B.); St. Michael's Hospital (G.S.); and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Hospital Network (M.T.B.); Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Steele CM, Bayley MT, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Nagy A, Namasivayam AM, Stokely SL, Wolkin T. A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Tongue-Pressure Resistance Training Protocols for Post-Stroke Dysphagia. Dysphagia 2016; 31:452-61. [PMID: 26936446 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-016-9699-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of two tongue resistance training protocols. One protocol ("tongue-pressure profile training") emphasized the pressure-timing patterns that are typically seen in healthy swallows by focusing on gradual pressure release and saliva swallowing tasks. The second protocol ("tongue-pressure strength and accuracy training") emphasized strength and accuracy in tongue-palate pressure generation and did not include swallowing tasks. A prospective, randomized, parallel allocation trial was conducted. Of 26 participants who were screened for eligibility, 14 received up to 24 sessions of treatment. Outcome measures of posterior tongue strength, oral bolus control, penetration-aspiration and vallecular residue were made based on videofluoroscopy analysis by blinded raters. Complete data were available for 11 participants. Significant improvements were seen in tongue strength and post-swallow vallecular residue with thin liquids, regardless of treatment condition. Stage transition duration (a measure of the duration of the bolus presence in the pharynx prior to swallow initiation, which had been chosen to capture impairments in oral bolus control) showed no significant differences. Similarly, significant improvements were not seen in median scores on the penetration-aspiration scale. This trial suggests that tongue strength can be improved with resistance training for individuals with tongue weakness following stroke. We conclude that improved penetration-aspiration does not necessarily accompany improvements in tongue strength; however, tongue-pressure resistance training does appear to be effective for reducing thin liquid vallecular residue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona M Steele
- Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon
- Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Ahmed Nagy
- Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
- University of Fayoum, Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Ashwini M Namasivayam
- Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Shauna L Stokely
- Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Talia Wolkin
- Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Journeay WS, MacDonald SL, Bayley MT. Rehabilitation and causes of premature mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:839-40. [PMID: 24990191 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W Shane Journeay
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shannon L MacDonald
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hall RE, Khan F, Bayley MT, Asllani E, Lindsay P, Hill MD, O'Callaghan C, Silver FL, Kapral MK. Benchmarks for acute stroke care delivery. Int J Qual Health Care 2013; 25:710-8. [PMID: 24141011 PMCID: PMC3842126 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite widespread interest in many jurisdictions in monitoring and improving the quality of stroke care delivery, benchmarks for most stroke performance indicators have not been established. The objective of this study was to develop data-derived benchmarks for acute stroke quality indicators. DESIGN Nine key acute stroke quality indicators were selected from the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Performance Measures Manual. PARTICIPANTS A population-based retrospective sample of patients discharged from 142 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1 April 2008 and 31 March 2009 (N = 3191) was used to calculate hospital rates of performance and benchmarks. INTERVENTION The Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) methodology was used to create benchmarks based on the performance of the upper 15% of patients in the top-performing hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Benchmarks were calculated for rates of neuroimaging, carotid imaging, stroke unit admission, dysphasia screening and administration of stroke-related medications. RESULTS The following benchmarks were derived: neuroimaging within 24 h, 98%; admission to a stroke unit, 77%; thrombolysis among patients arriving within 2.5 h, 59%; carotid imaging, 93%; dysphagia screening, 88%; antithrombotic therapy, 98%; anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, 94%; antihypertensive therapy, 92% and lipid-lowering therapy, 77%. ABC™ acute stroke care benchmarks achieve or exceed the consensus-based targets required by Accreditation Canada, with the exception of dysphagia screening. CONCLUSIONS Benchmarks for nine hospital-based acute stroke care quality indicators have been established. These can be used in the development of standards for quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Hall
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave, G wing, G-106, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community integration is considered an ultimate goal for rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). PURPOSE To determine (a) whether differences exist in rehabilitation outcomes between intentional and unintentional TBI populations and (b) whether TBI from assault is a predictor of community integration following inpatient rehabilitation. METHOD Retrospective cohort study using population-based data from Canadian hospital administration records, 2001 to 2006. Outcome measure was the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI). FINDINGS From a sample of 243 persons, 24 (9.9%) had sustained TBI from physical assault. Persons with TBI from physical assault reported significantly lower scores on two items on the RNLI's Daily Functioning subscale: "recreation" and "family role." IMPLICATIONS These findings suggest that targeted intervention in these specific areas could be beneficial, which are often primarily addressed by occupational therapists in both inpatient rehabilitation and community settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwan Kim
- Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Daegu University, Jullyang, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bayley MT, Hurdowar A, Richards CL, Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Eng JJ, McKay-Lyons M, Harrison E, Teasell R, Harrison M, Graham ID. Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multi-site pilot project. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34:1633-8. [PMID: 22631218 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.656790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the barriers to implementation of evidence-based recommendations (EBRs) for stroke rehabilitation experienced by nurses, occupational therapists, physical therapists, physicians and hospital managers. METHODS The Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation by Evidence project developed EBRs for arm and leg rehabilitation after stroke. Five Canadian stroke inpatient rehabilitation centers participated in a pilot implementation study. At each site, a clinician was identified as the "local facilitator" to promote the 6-month implementation. A research coordinator observed the process. Focus groups done at completion were analyzed thematically for barriers by two raters. RESULTS A total of 79 rehabilitation professionals (23 occupational therapists, 17 physical therapists, 23 nurses and 16 directors/managers) participated in 21 focus groups of three to six participants each. The most commonly noted barrier to implementation was lack of time followed by staffing issues, training/education, therapy selection and prioritization, equipment availability and team functioning/communication. There was variation in perceptions of barriers across stakeholders. Nurses noted more training and staffing issues and managers perceived fewer barriers than frontline clinicians. CONCLUSIONS Rehabilitation guideline developers should prioritize evidence for implementation and employ user-friendly language. Guideline implementation strategies must be extremely time efficient. Organizational approaches may be required to overcome the barriers. [Box: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T Bayley
- Neuro Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|