1
|
Reszel J, van den Hoek J, Nguyen T, Aravind G, Bayley MT, Bird ML, Edwards K, Eng JJ, Moore JL, Nelson MLA, Ploughman M, Richardson J, Salbach NM, Tang A, Graham ID. The Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner: Mixed Methods User Evaluation. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e37189. [PMID: 35904870 PMCID: PMC9377478 DOI: 10.2196/37189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As more people are surviving stroke, there is a growing need for services and programs that support the long-term needs of people living with the effects of stroke. Exercise has many benefits; however, most people with stroke do not have access to specialized exercise programs that meet their needs in their communities. To catalyze the implementation of these programs, our team developed the Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner, an evidence-informed implementation guide for teams planning a community-based exercise program for people with stroke. Objective This study aimed to conduct a user evaluation to elicit user perceptions of the usefulness and acceptability of the Planner to inform revisions. Methods This mixed methods study used a concurrent triangulation design. We used purposive sampling to enroll a diverse sample of end users (program managers and coordinators, rehabilitation health partners, and fitness professionals) from three main groups: those who are currently planning a program, those who intend to plan a program in the future, and those who had previously planned a program. Participants reviewed the Planner and completed a questionnaire and interviews to identify positive features, areas of improvement, value, and feasibility. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. We triangulated the data sources to identify Planner modifications. Results A total of 39 people participated in this study. Overall, the feedback was positive, highlighting the value of the Planner’s comprehensiveness, tools and templates, and real-world examples. The identified areas for improvement included clarifying the need for specific steps, refining navigation, and creating more action-oriented content. Most participants reported an increase in knowledge and confidence after reading the Planner and reported that using the resource would improve their planning approach. Conclusions We used a rigorous and user-centered process to develop and evaluate the Planner. End users indicated that it is a valuable resource and identified specific changes for improvement. The Planner was subsequently updated and is now publicly available for community planning teams to use in the planning and delivery of evidence-informed, sustainable, community-based exercise programs for people with stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Reszel
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tram Nguyen
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Louise Bird
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kate Edwards
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Janice J Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Moore
- South Eastern Norway Regional Knowledge Translation Center, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN, United States
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Ploughman
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ada Tang
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reszel J, van den Hoek J, Nguyen T, Aravind G, Bayley MT, Bird ML, Edwards K, Eng JJ, Moore JL, Nelson MLA, Ploughman M, Richardson J, Salbach NM, Tang A, Graham ID. How Community-Based Teams Use the Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner: Longitudinal Qualitative Field Test Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e37243. [PMID: 35904855 PMCID: PMC9377454 DOI: 10.2196/37243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner guides teams through the process of planning for the implementation of community-based exercise programs for people with stroke, in alignment with implementation science frameworks. Objective The purpose of this study was to conduct a field test with end users to describe how teams used the Planner in real-world conditions; describe the effects of Planner use on participants’ implementation-planning knowledge, attitudes, and activities; and identify factors influencing the use of the Planner. Methods This field test study used a longitudinal qualitative design. We recruited teams across Canada who intended to implement a community-based exercise program for people with stroke in the next 6 to 12 months and were willing to use the Planner to guide their work. We completed semistructured interviews at the time of enrollment, monitoring calls every 1 to 2 months, and at the end of the study to learn about implementation-planning work completed and Planner use. The interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Completed Planner steps were plotted onto a timeline for comparison across teams. Results We enrolled 12 participants (program managers and coordinators, rehabilitation professionals, and fitness professionals) from 5 planning teams. The teams were enrolled in the study between 4 and 14 months, and we conducted 25 interviews. We observed that the teams worked through the planning process in diverse and nonlinear ways, adapted to their context. All teams provided examples of how using the Planner changed their implementation-planning knowledge (eg, knowing the steps), attitudes (eg, valuing community engagement), and activities (eg, hosting stakeholder meetings). We identified team, organizational, and broader contextual factors that hindered and facilitated uptake of the Planner. Participants shared valuable tips from the field to help future teams optimize use of the Planner. Conclusions The Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner is an adaptable resource that may be used in diverse settings to plan community-based exercise programs for people with stroke. These findings may be informative to others who are developing resources to build the capacity of those working in community-based settings to implement new programs and practices. Future work is needed to monitor the use and understand the effect of using the Planner on exercise program implementation and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Reszel
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tram Nguyen
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mark T Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Louise Bird
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, ON, Canada
| | - Kate Edwards
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Janice J Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Moore
- South Eastern Norway Regional Knowledge Translation Center, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN, United States
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Ploughman
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ada Tang
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harrison MB, Graham ID, van den Hoek J, Dogherty EJ, Carley ME, Angus V. Guideline adaptation and implementation planning: a prospective observational study. Implement Sci 2013; 8:49. [PMID: 23656884 PMCID: PMC3668213 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2012] [Accepted: 05/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adaptation of high-quality practice guidelines for local use has been advanced as an efficient means to improve acceptability and applicability of evidence-informed care. In a pan-Canadian study, we examined how cancer care groups adapted pre-existing guidelines to their unique context and began implementation planning. METHODS Using a mixed-methods, case-study design, five cases were purposefully sampled from self-identified groups and followed as they used a structured method and resources for guideline adaptation. Cases received the ADAPTE Collaboration toolkit, facilitation, methodological and logistical support, resources and assistance as required. Documentary and primary data collection methods captured individual case experience, including monthly summaries of meeting and field notes, email/telephone correspondence, and project records. Site visits, process audits, interviews, and a final evaluation forum with all cases contributed to a comprehensive account of participant experience. RESULTS Study cases took 12 to >24 months to complete guideline adaptation. Although participants appreciated the structure, most found the ADAPTE method complex and lacking practical aspects. They needed assistance establishing individual guideline mandate and infrastructure, articulating health questions, executing search strategies, appraising evidence, and achieving consensus. Facilitation was described as a multi-faceted process, a team effort, and an essential ingredient for guideline adaptation. While front-line care providers implicitly identified implementation issues during adaptation, they identified a need to add an explicit implementation planning component. CONCLUSIONS Guideline adaptation is a positive initial step toward evidence-informed care, but adaptation (vs. 'de novo' development) did not meet expectations for reducing time or resource commitments. Undertaking adaptation is as much about the process (engagement and capacity building) as it is about the product (adapted guideline). To adequately address local concerns, cases found it necessary to also search and appraise primary studies, resulting in hybrid (adaptation plus de novo) guideline development strategies that required advanced methodological skills.Adaptation was found to be an action element in the knowledge translation continuum that required integration of an implementation perspective. Accordingly, the adaptation methodology and resources were reformulated and substantially augmented to provide practical assistance to groups not supported by a dedicated guideline panel and to provide more implementation planning support. The resulting framework is called CAN-IMPLEMENT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret B Harrison
- School of Nursing, Queen’s University, 78 Barrie Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Joan van den Hoek
- School of Nursing, Queen’s University, 78 Barrie Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Elizabeth J Dogherty
- School of Nursing, Queen’s University, 78 Barrie Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Meg E Carley
- School of Nursing, Queen’s University, 78 Barrie Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Valerie Angus
- School of Nursing, Queen’s University, 78 Barrie Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|