1
|
Scott HM, Coombes L, Braybrook D, Harðardóttir D, Roach A, Bristowe K, Bluebond-Langner M, Fraser LK, Downing J, Farsides B, Murtagh FEM, Ellis-Smith C, Harding R. What are the anticipated benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators to implementing person-centred outcome measures into routine care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions? A qualitative interview study with key stakeholders. Palliat Med 2024; 38:471-484. [PMID: 38481003 PMCID: PMC11025304 DOI: 10.1177/02692163241234797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing evidence-base underpinning implementation of person-centred outcome measures into adult palliative care. However evidence on how best to achieve this with children facing life-threatening and life-limiting conditions is limited. AIM To identify the anticipated benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators to implementing person-centred outcome measures for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. DESIGN Cross-sectional qualitative semi-structured interview study with key stakeholders analysed using Framework analysis informed by the adapted-Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS A total of n = 26 children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions, n = 40 parents/carers, n = 13 siblings and n = 15 health and social care professionals recruited from six hospitals and three children's hospices and n = 12 Commissioners of health services. RESULTS All participants were supportive of future implementation of person-centred outcome measures into care. Anticipated benefits included: better understanding of patient and family priorities, improved communication and collaborative working between professionals and families and standardisation in data collection and reporting. Anticipated risks included increased workload for staff and measures not being used as intended. Implementation barriers included: acceptability and usability of outcome measures by children; burden and capacity of parents/carers regarding completion; privacy concerns; and language barriers. Implementation facilitators included designing measures using language that is meaningful to children and families, ensuring potential benefits of person-centred outcome measures are communicated to encourage 'buy-in' and administering measures with known and trusted professional. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of person-centred outcome measures offer potential benefits for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. Eight recommendations are made to maximise benefits and minimise risks in implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah May Scott
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Lucy Coombes
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Debbie Braybrook
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Daney Harðardóttir
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Anna Roach
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
- University College London, London, UK
| | - Katherine Bristowe
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Myra Bluebond-Langner
- University College London, Louis Dundas Centre for Children’s Palliative Care, London, UK
- Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Lorna K Fraser
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Julia Downing
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
- International Children’s Palliative Care Network, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Bobbie Farsides
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Fliss EM Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sammy A, Baba A, Klassen TP, Moher D, Offringa M. A Decade of Efforts to Add Value to Child Health Research Practices. J Pediatr 2024; 265:113840. [PMID: 38000771 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify practices that add value to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of child health research and reduce research waste. STUDY DESIGN In order to categorize the contributions of members of Standards for Research (StaR) in Child Health network, we developed a novel Child Health Improving Research Practices (CHIRP) framework comprised of 5 domains meant to counteract avoidable child health research waste and improve quality: 1) address research questions relevant to children, their families, clinicians, and researchers; 2) apply appropriate research design, conduct and analysis; 3) ensure efficient research oversight and regulation; 4) Provide accessible research protocols and reports; and 5) develop unbiased and usable research reports, including 17 responsible research practice recommendations. All child health research relevant publications by the 48 original StaR standards' authors over the last decade were identified, and main topic areas were categorized using this framework. RESULTS A total of 247 publications were included in the final sample: 100 publications (41%) in domain 1 (3 recommendations), 77 publications (31%) in domain 2 (3), 35 publications (14%) in domain 3 (4), 20 publications (8%) in domain 4 (4), and 15 publications (6%) in domain 5 (3). We identified readily implementable "responsible" research practices to counter child health research waste and improve quality, especially in the areas of patients and families' engagement throughout the research process, developing Core Outcome Sets, and addressing ethics and regulatory oversight issues. CONCLUSION While most of the practices are readily implementable, increased awareness of methodological issues and wider guideline uptake is needed to improve child health research. The CHIRP Framework can be used to guide responsible research practices that add value to child health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Sammy
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ami Baba
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Terry P Klassen
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Offringa
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fisher V, Atkin K, Ewing G, Grande G, Fraser LK. Assessing the suitability of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT-Paediatric) for use with parents of children with a life-limiting condition: A qualitative secondary analysis. Palliat Med 2024; 38:100-109. [PMID: 38142279 PMCID: PMC10798015 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231214471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The demands of caring for a child with a life-limiting condition can have a profound impact on parents' health and wellbeing. Currently, there is no standard procedure for identifying and addressing the support needs of these parents. AIM To assess the suitability of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT (Paediatric)) for use with parents of children with a life-limiting condition. DESIGN Secondary qualitative content analysis of two qualitative datasets exploring the health, wellbeing and experiences of support of mothers and fathers of children with a life-limiting condition. SETTING A total of 30 mothers and 12 fathers were recruited via four UK children's hospices and social media. RESULTS Parental experiences of support mapped onto the existing domains of the CSNAT (Paediatric). One aspect of their experience, surrounding their child's educational needs, went beyond the existing domains of the CSNAT. An adapted version of the tool CSNAT (Paediatric) should include this domain. CONCLUSION The CSNAT (Paediatric) is a relevant tool for the assessment of parental support needs. Further research should assess the acceptability and feasibility of implementation of the broader intervention: CSNAT-I (Paediatric).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karl Atkin
- Department of Sociology, University of York, York, UK
| | - Gail Ewing
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gunn Grande
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lorna K Fraser
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Polakova K, Ahmed F, Vlckova K, Brearley SG. Parents' experiences of being involved in medical decision-making for their child with a life-limiting condition: A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Palliat Med 2024; 38:7-24. [PMID: 38053373 PMCID: PMC10798032 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231214414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parental involvement in the decision-making processes about medical treatment for children with life-limiting conditions is recognised as good practice. Previous research highlighted factors affecting the decision-making process, but little is known about how parents experience their participation. AIM To explore how parents experience their participation in the process of decision-making about treatment and future care for their children with life-limiting conditions. DESIGN A systematically constructed review using narrative synthesis. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to report the findings. Databases Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched up to December 2023. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (RN CRD42021215863). RESULTS From the initial 2512 citations identified, 28 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. A wide range of medical decisions was identified; stopping general or life-sustaining treatment was most frequent. Narrative synthesis revealed six themes: (1) Temporal aspects affecting the experience with decision-making; (2) Losing control of the situation; (3) Transferring the power to decide to doctors; (4) To be a 'good' parent and protect the child; (5) The emotional state of parents and (6) Sources of support to alleviate the parental experience. CONCLUSIONS Parental experiences with decision-making are complex and multifactorial. Parents' ability to effectively participate in the process is limited, as they are not empowered to do so and the circumstances in which the decisions are taking place are challenging. Healthcare professionals need to support parental involvement in an effective way instead of just formally asking them to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristyna Polakova
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
- Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Faraz Ahmed
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Sarah G Brearley
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coombes L, Harðardóttir D, Braybrook D, Scott HM, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Fraser LK, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Murtagh FEM, Harding R. Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation. Palliat Med 2023; 37:1509-1519. [PMID: 37853579 PMCID: PMC10657511 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231205126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no validated outcome measure for use in children's palliative care outside sub-Saharan Africa. Stakeholders must be involved in the development of such measures to ensure face and content validity. AIM To gain expert stakeholder consensus on items for inclusion in a paediatric palliative care outcome measure to establish face and content validity. DESIGN This study was conducted in two phases following Rothrock and COSMIN guidance on patient-reported outcome measure development. Phase 1: Three-round modified Delphi survey to establish consensus on priority items. Phase 2: Item generation meeting with key stakeholders to develop initial measure versions. A young person's advisory group was also consulted on priority outcomes. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Delphi survey: Parents and professionals with experience of caring for a child with a life-limiting condition. Young person's advisory group: young people age 10-20 years. Item generation meeting: bereaved parents, academics and clinicians. RESULTS Phase 1: Delphi survey (n = 82). Agreement increased from Kendall's W = 0.17 to W = 0.61, indicating movement towards consensus. Agreement between professional and parent ranking was poor (Cohen's kappa 0.13). Professionals prioritised physical symptoms, whereas parents prioritised psychosocial and practical concerns. Advisory group: Children (n = 22) prioritised items related to living a 'normal life' in addition to items prioritised by adult participants. Phase 2: Five age/developmental stage appropriate child and proxy-reported versions of C-POS, containing 13 items, were drafted. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance and feasibility of involving key stakeholders in PROM item generation, as important differences were found in the priority outcomes identified by children, parents and professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Coombes
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Daney Harðardóttir
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Debbie Braybrook
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Hannah May Scott
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Katherine Bristowe
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Lorna K Fraser
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Julia Downing
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
- International Children’s Palliative Care Network, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Myra Bluebond-Langner
- University College London, Louis Dundas Centre for Children’s Palliative Care, London, UK
- Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Fliss EM Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Drake EK, Weeks LE, van Manen M, Shin HD, Wong H, Taylor D, McKibbon S, Curran J. The Delivery of Palliative and End-of-Life Care to Adolescents and Young Adults Living with Cancer: A Scoping Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:611-624. [PMID: 37155194 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The primary purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the existing evidence on the delivery of palliative and end-of-life care to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with cancer, by identifying knowledge gaps and discussing the key characteristics and types of evidence in this field. This study employed a JBI scoping review design. CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (EBSCO), and Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index; Clarivate Analytics) databases were searched along with grey literature sources to February 2022 for related studies on the delivery of palliative and end-of-life care to AYAs. No search restrictions were applied. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for eligibility, and they extracted data from studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 29,394 records were identified through our search strategy and 51 studies met the inclusion criteria of the study. The studies were published between 2004 and 2022, with the majority from North America (65%). The included studies involved patient, healthcare provider, caregiver, and public stakeholders. Their primary foci were often on end-of-life outcomes (41%) and/or advance care planning/end-of-life priorities and decision-making (35%). This review identified several evidence gaps within the field, including a focus primarily on patients who have died. Findings highlight the need for more collaborative research with AYAs on their experiences with palliative and end-of-life care, as well as their involvement as patient partners in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily K Drake
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- IWK Health, Halifax, Canada
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Halifax, Canada
| | - Lori E Weeks
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Halifax, Canada
- Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada
| | - Michael van Manen
- John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Hwayeon Danielle Shin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Centre for Complex Care Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Helen Wong
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Dani Taylor
- Patient Partner, St. John's, Canada
- Young Adult Cancer Canada, St. John's, Canada
| | - Shelley McKibbon
- Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Halifax, Canada
- W.K. Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Janet Curran
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- IWK Health, Halifax, Canada
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Willis E, Godbold R. Children's complex health: Maternal experiences of care and decision making. J Child Health Care 2023:13674935231158456. [PMID: 36857439 DOI: 10.1177/13674935231158456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
An increasing number of children with complex life-limiting and life-threatening conditions are being cared for at home by their parents. Negative impacts on maternal health are now being recognised. This study sought to voice parental experiences to determine what matters most; explore day-to-day decision making and Advance Care Planning; and to inform local service development. Seven mothers from one community nursing service were interviewed using a semi-structured qualitative approach during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Seven data-driven themes were identified following six phase thematic analysis: cherishing normality; navigating the system; being proactive; meaningful connections; beginner to expert - and back; they're not any child - they're my child; and Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Practice implications include early discussion of what matters most and benefits of written plans to ensure fair access to treatment for children with complex health. Mothers highlighted that sharing their story enhanced their sense of coping and purpose. Increased support at times of vulnerability and permission to explore decisions were highly valued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Willis
- 7616East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barrett L, Fraser L, Noyes J, Taylor J, Hackett J. Understanding parent experiences of end-of-life care for children: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Palliat Med 2023; 37:178-202. [PMID: 36546591 PMCID: PMC9896294 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221144084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An estimated 21 million children worldwide would benefit from palliative care input and over 7 million die each year. For parents of these children this is an intensely emotional and painful time through which they will need support. There is a lack of synthesised research about how parents experience the care delivered to their child at the end of life. AIM To systematically identify and synthesise qualitative research on parents' experiences of end-of-life care of their child. DESIGN A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021242946). DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases were searched for qualitative studies published post-2000 to April 2020. Studies were appraised for methodological quality and data richness. Confidence in findings was assessed by GRADE-CERQual. RESULTS About 95 studies met the eligibility criteria. A purposive sample of 25 studies was taken, of good-quality papers with rich data describing the experience of over 470 parents. There were two overarching themes: parents of children receiving end-of-life care experienced a profound need to fulfil the parental role; and care of the parent. Subthemes included establishing their role, maintaining identity, ultimate responsibility, reconstructing the parental role, and continuing parenting after death. CONCLUSIONS Services delivering end-of-life care for children need to recognise the importance for parents of being able to fulfil their parental role and consider how they enable this. What the parental role consists of, and how it's expressed, differs for individuals. Guidance should acknowledge the need to enable parents to parent at their child's end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Barrett
- Martin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lorna Fraser
- Martin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Social Science, Bangor University, Wales, UK
| | - Jo Taylor
- Martin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Julia Hackett
- Martin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Modanloo S, Correll Q, Correll R, Major N, Quinlan M, Reszel J, Wilding J, Lin Zhou Z, Franck LS, Harrison D. Identifying research priorities with children, youth, and families: A scoping review. J Child Health Care 2023:13674935231151748. [PMID: 36647285 DOI: 10.1177/13674935231151748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Increased patient advocacy has resulted in a shift toward more active patient engagement in the research. A scoping review was conducted to explore the literature on healthcare research priority settings wherein children, youths, or their families were involved in the priority-setting process. Six databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and Global Health and the James Lind Alliance website were searched up until September 2019. All primary studies involving children (<18 years of age) or families in developing research priorities in health care were included. All retrieved references were uploaded into Covidence, and two independent reviewers screened the search results. Descriptive thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. A total of 30 studies with 4247 participants were included. Less than half of the participants (n = 1237, (33%) were pediatric patients and their families. A total of 455 research priorities were identified. Three common themes emerged: (i) quality of care delivery, (ii) self-efficacy in health behaviors, and (iii) community engagement in care. This scoping review revealed priority research health topics from the perspectives of children, youths, or their families. The findings may be used as a foundation for future research to improve the health outcomes of children, youths, or their families according to their identified priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shokoufeh Modanloo
- Arthur Labatt School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, 70383Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Quinn Correll
- Rankin School of Nursing, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada
| | - Rhonda Correll
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario 274065(CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nathalie Major
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario 274065(CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Quinlan
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario 274065(CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica Reszel
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario 274065(CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jodi Wilding
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario 274065(CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Zhi Lin Zhou
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario 274065(CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Linda S Franck
- School of Nursing, 8783University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Denise Harrison
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lund H, Tang L, Poulsen I, la Cour K, Bjerrum M, Nielsen CV, Maribo T. Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes - a scoping review of evidence syntheses. Syst Rev 2022; 11:277. [PMID: 36564846 PMCID: PMC9784020 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02149-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A systematically and transparently prepared research priority-setting process within a specific scientific area is essential in order to develop a comprehensive and progressive evidence-based approach that will have a substantial societal impact on the site of interest. On the basis of two consensus workshops, the authors suggest the following methods for all such processes: use of experts, stakeholder involvement, literature review, and ranking. OBJECTIVES The identification, categorisation, and discussion of methods for preparing a research prioritisation process. METHODS Eligibility criteria: Evidence synthesis includes original studies presenting a research prioritisation process and which listed the methods used to create a research prioritisation process. Only evidence syntheses related to health research were included. DATA SOURCES We searched the following electronic databases, without limiting by date or language: MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, Epistemonikos, and CINAHL EBSCO. CHARTING METHODS The methods used were mapped and broken down into different elements, and the use of the elements was determined. To support the mapping, (A) all of the elements were collapsed into unique categories, and (B) four essential categories were selected as crucial to a successful research prioritisation process. RESULTS Twelve evidence syntheses were identified, including 416 original studies. The identification and categorisation of methods used resulted in 13 unique categories of methods used to prepare a research agenda. CONCLUSION None of the identified categories was used in all of the original studies. Surprisingly, all four of the essential categories were used in only one of the 416 original studies identified. There is seemingly no international consensus on which methods to use when preparing a research prioritisation process. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/dygz8/ ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Lund
- Section Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5063, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Lars Tang
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Slagelse, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Poulsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark.,Research Unit of Nursing and Healthcare, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karen la Cour
- Research Unit of User Perspectives and Community-Based Interventions, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Merete Bjerrum
- Research Unit of Nursing and Healthcare, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,The Centre of Clinical Guidelines, Department of Clinical Medicine & The Danish Centre of Systematic Reviews - a JBI Centre of Excellence, University of Adelaide, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.,Regionshospital Gødstrup, Herning, Denmark
| | - Thomas Maribo
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oakley S, Dunbar H, de Vries K. Parent-led strategies supporting personal well-being when caring for a child with a life-limiting condition: A scoping review. J Child Health Care 2022; 26:648-667. [PMID: 34372722 DOI: 10.1177/13674935211026122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this review were to identify strategies initiated by parents of children with life-limiting conditions to support their own well-being at home and to describe the impact of these strategies on parental well-being. A systematic scoping review was performed using PRISMA-ScR guidelines, identifying 15 relevant studies that fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were no studies that specifically assessed how parents support their own well-being; however, the 15 identified studies did provide pertinent data secondary to the primary aims of each study. This resulted in the identification of 14 parent-initiated strategies which were grouped thematically into 4 categories: (i) social experience and peer support, (ii) information and management techniques, (iii) reframed perspectives and (iv) prioritising own needs. Overall, there was some evidence of parents initiating specific, individualised and useful strategies to supporting their well-being. Notably lacking was any empirical evaluation as to the effectiveness of these strategies and the wider factors associated with them. Further research is required to assess how parents support their personal well-being in daily life and how these strategies can be implemented alongside service-initiated support to ensure full parental well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Oakley
- Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, 4487De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Helena Dunbar
- Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, 4487De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Kay de Vries
- Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, 4487De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
O'Rourke G, Beresford B. Research priorities for homecare for older people: A UK multi-stakeholder consultation. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e5647-e5660. [PMID: 36134898 PMCID: PMC10087309 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Homecare is generally understood to refer to services that support people to continue living in their own homes. Older people are the primary users and many countries report an increase in the number using homecare services and greater spending on such provision, driven in part by investment in 'ageing in place' policies. Despite this, and reflecting social care more generally, homecare is relatively under-researched. However, in the UK at least, there is growing interest and investment in social care research. In order that this investment is not wasted, it is essential that research addresses what stakeholders identify as research priorities. This study reports work undertaken in the UK during 2021/22 to identify research priorities for homecare for older people, and a broad scoping of existing evidence. A two-stage consultation process was used. First, topic areas for research were identified through consultations with stakeholders. Second, a survey ascertained agreement and differences between groups regarding the relative importance of topic areas as research priorities. Over 50 people participated including older people (n = 7), family members (n = 11), homecare workers (n = 16), homecare providers (n = 9) and national policy, evidence and advocacy leads (n = 13). Twenty discrete research topic areas were identified. Only one topic area (Joint working between homecare and health services) was a 'Top 5' research priority for all stakeholder groups. Timely engagement with homecare and Workforce: recruitment and retention were 'Top 5' priorities for three stakeholder groups. Scoping of existing research indicates that topic areas receiving the most research attention to date are not among those identified as being of high priority for research. To our knowledge, this is the first time research priorities for homecare have been generated. Findings will be of value to research funders, organisations using research evidence and the research community.
Collapse
|
13
|
Papworth A, Hackett J, Beresford B, Murtagh F, Weatherly H, Hinde S, Bedendo A, Walker G, Noyes J, Oddie S, Vasudevan C, Feltbower R, Phillips B, Hain R, Subramanian G, Haynes A, Fraser LK. End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:37. [PMID: 35935675 PMCID: PMC7613236 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13273.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Although child mortality has decreased over the last few decades, around 4,500 infants and children die in the UK every year, many of whom require palliative care. There is, however, little evidence on paediatric end-of-life care services. The current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance provides recommendations about what should be offered, but these are based on low quality evidence. The ENHANCE study aims to identify and investigate the different models of existing end-of-life care provision for infants, children, and young people in the UK, including an assessment of the outcomes and experiences for children and parents, and the cost implications to families and healthcare providers. Methods This mixed methods study will use three linked workstreams and a cross-cutting health economics theme to examine end-of-life care models in three exemplar clinical settings: infant, children and young adult cancer services (PTCs), paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and neonatal units (NNUs).Workstream 1 (WS1) will survey current practice in each setting and will result in an outline of the different models of care used. WS2 is a qualitative comparison of the experiences of staff, parents and patients across the different models identified. WS3 is a quantitative assessment of the outcomes, resource use and costs across the different models identified. Discussion Results from this study will contribute to an understanding of how end-of-life care can provide the greatest benefit for children at the end of their lives. It will also allow us to understand the likely benefits of additional funding in end-of-life care in terms of patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Papworth
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Martin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Julia Hackett
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Martin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Bryony Beresford
- Martin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Fliss Murtagh
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
| | - Helen Weatherly
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Sebastian Hinde
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Andre Bedendo
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Martin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | | - Jane Noyes
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Fron Heulog, Bangor, LL57 2EF, UK
| | - Sam Oddie
- Bradford Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | | | - Richard Feltbower
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Bob Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Richard Hain
- All-Wales Paediatric Palliative Care Network, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Gayathri Subramanian
- Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Andrew Haynes
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Martin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Lorna K Fraser
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Martin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ekberg S, Bowers A, Bradford N, Ekberg K, Rolfe M, Elvidge N, Cook R, Roberts SJ, Howard C, Agar M, Deleuil R, Fleming S, Hynson J, Jolly A, Heywood M, Waring S, Rice T, Vickery A. Enhancing paediatric palliative care: A rapid review to inform continued development of care for children with life-limiting conditions. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:232-237. [PMID: 34904760 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.15851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM Following the establishment of paediatric palliative care services over recent decades, this study sought to identify information to inform future policy and practice. METHODS A rapid review using thematic synthesis was conducted to synthesise existing information about improving paediatric palliative care. Information was extracted in relation to key areas for investment and change: quality, access, advance care planning, skills, research, collaboration and community awareness. RESULTS A total of 2228 literature sources were screened, with 369 included. Synthesised information identified clear ways to improve quality of care, access to care, advance care planning, and research and data collection. The synthesis identified knowledge gaps in understanding how to improve skills in paediatric palliative care, collaboration across Australian jurisdictions and community awareness. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review bring together information from a vast range of sources to provide action-oriented information to target investment and change in paediatric palliative care over the coming decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Ekberg
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alison Bowers
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Natalie Bradford
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Katie Ekberg
- School of Early Childhood and Inclusive Education, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Melanie Rolfe
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Norah Elvidge
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca Cook
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Queensland Paediatric Rehabilitation Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sara-Jane Roberts
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,IMPACCT (Improving Palliative Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation) Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine Howard
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation) Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Renee Deleuil
- WA Paediatric Palliative Care Service, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sara Fleming
- Paediatric Palliative Care Service, Women's and Children's Health Network, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jenny Hynson
- Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ashka Jolly
- Paediatric Palliative Care Service, Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Melissa Heywood
- Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon Waring
- Palliative Care Australia, Griffith, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Toni Rice
- Palliative Care Australia, Griffith, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Annette Vickery
- Palliative Care Australia, Griffith, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tan A, Nagraj SK, Nasser M, Sharma T, Kuchenmüller T. What do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews. BULLETIN OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE 2022; 46:6. [PMID: 35013662 PMCID: PMC8733764 DOI: 10.1186/s42269-021-00687-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This overview aimed to synthesize existing systematic reviews to produce a draft framework of evidence-informed health priority setting that supports countries in identifying appropriate steps and methods when developing and implementing national research agendas. MAIN BODY We searched Ovid MEDLINE® and the WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing from 2010 to 2020 for critical or systematic reviews that evaluated research priority setting exercises. We adapted the AMSTAR checklist to assess the quality of included reviews and used adapted frameworks for data extraction and analysis. The search resulted in 2395 titles, of which 31 were included. Populations included in the reviews typically involved patients, families and carers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and research funders. The topics covered in the reviews varied from specific diseases or conditions, approaches for healthcare practice or research priority setting methods itself. All the included systematic reviews were of low or critically low quality. The studies were thematically grouped based on their main focus: identifying and engaging with stakeholders; methods; context; and health area. CONCLUSION Our overview of reviews has reconfirmed aspects of existing frameworks, but has also identified new concepts for countries to consider while developing their national research agendas. We propose a preliminary framework for consideration that highlights four key phases: (1) preparatory, (2) priority setting, (3) follow-up phase and (4) sustainability phase, which have thirteen sub-domains to consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Tan
- Office of the Vice-Provost (Research, Innovation and Global Engagement), University College London, 2 Taviton Street, London, WC1H 0BT UK
| | - Sumanth Kumbagere Nagraj
- Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, The John Bull Building, Research Way, Plymouth, PL6 8BU Devon UK
| | - Mona Nasser
- Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, The John Bull Building, Research Way, Plymouth, PL6 8BU Devon UK
| | - Tarang Sharma
- WHO Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tanja Kuchenmüller
- WHO Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Achieving child-centred care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions-a qualitative interview study. Eur J Pediatr 2022; 181:3739-3752. [PMID: 35953678 PMCID: PMC9371630 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04566-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This study aims to identify the symptoms, concerns, and care priorities of children with life-limiting conditions and their families. A semi-structured qualitative interview study was conducted, seeking perspectives from multiple stakeholders on symptoms, other concerns, and care priorities of children and young people with life limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families. Participants were recruited from six hospitals and three children's hospices in the UK. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. A total of 106 participants were recruited: 26 children (5-17 years), 40 parents (of children 0-17 years), 13 siblings (5-17 years), 15 health and social care professionals, 12 commissioners. Participants described many inter-related symptoms, concerns, and care priorities impacting on all aspects of life. Burdensome symptoms included pain and seizures. Participants spoke of the emotional and social impacts of living with life-limiting conditions, such as being able to see friends, and accessing education and psychological support. Spiritual/existential concerns included the meaning of illness and planning for an uncertain future. Data revealed an overarching theme of pursuing 'normality', described as children's desire to undertake usual childhood activities. Parents need support with practical aspects of care to help realise this desire for normality. CONCLUSION Children with life-limiting conditions and their families experience a wide range of inter-related symptoms, concerns, and care priorities. A holistic, child-centred approach to care is needed, allowing focus on pursuit of normal childhood activities. Improvements in accessibility, co-ordination, and availability of health services are required to achieve this. WHAT IS KNOWN • Existing evidence regarding symptoms, concerns, and care priorities for children with life-limiting conditions is largely limited to proxy-reported data and those with a cancer diagnosis. • Child-centred care provision must be directed by children's perspectives on their priorities for care. WHAT IS NEW • Social and educational activities are more important to children with life-limiting conditions than their medical concerns. • A holistic approach to care is required that extends beyond addressing medical needs, in order to support children with life-limiting conditions to focus on pursuit of normal childhood activities.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mitchell S, Slowther AM, Coad J, Bertaud S, Dale J. Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of palliative care to children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals. Arch Dis Child 2022; 107:59-64. [PMID: 33980510 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand healthcare system facilitators and barriers to the delivery of palliative care for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their family members. DESIGN Focus groups with children's palliative care professionals. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. SETTING Four regions of England (West Midlands, South West, Yorkshire and Humber, and London) from December 2017 to June 2018. PARTICIPANTS Healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals) working in children's palliative care services. FINDINGS A total of 71 healthcare professionals participated in the focus groups. Three overarching themes were identified which influenced whether and when children were referred to and started to receive palliative care: (1) the unspoken background of clinical uncertainty which often delayed palliative care; (2) the cultural 'collusion of immortality', where conversations about the possibility of dying can be avoided or deferred; and (3) the role of paediatric palliative care teams in 'illuminating the blind spot' of palliative care as well as providing hands-on care. CONCLUSIONS Palliative care is a holistic approach to care that focuses on quality of life for people living with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions that can be delivered alongside active treatment. There is a need to prioritise and integrate this into healthcare services for children more effectively if improvements in care are to be realised. While more specialist paediatric palliative care services are needed, the unspoken background of clinical uncertainty needs to be addressed together with the collusion of immortality within healthcare culture and organisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Mitchell
- Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK .,Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Jane Coad
- University of Nottingham School of Health Sciences, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sophie Bertaud
- The Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Dale
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Drake EK, Weeks LE, van Manen M, Curran J, McKibbon S. The delivery of palliative and end-of-life care to adolescents and young adults living with cancer: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 19:3384-3393. [PMID: 34283816 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review will provide an overview of the evidence on the delivery of palliative and end-of-life care to adolescents and young adults living with cancer, by identifying knowledge gaps and discussing the key characteristics and types of evidence in this field. INTRODUCTION Adolescents and young adults receive their diagnoses at an important stage of development, and often access health systems that are ill-equipped to deal with them, leading to many unmet needs. Some of these needs can be addressed by holistic palliative care services. A better understanding of the literature in this area is needed to identify what is known about the delivery of care to adolescents and young adults. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review will consider studies that pertain to the delivery of palliative and end-of-life care for adolescents and young adults living with cancer. Relevant research may be in the context of ambulatory services, advance care planning, palliative care units, home care, hospices, and end-of-lifecare facilities. Studies that concern other oncology populations will be excluded. METHODS CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), APA PsycINFO (EBSCO), and Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index; Clarivate Analytics) databases will be searched, along with other sources of gray literature. No date limit will be set. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts for studies that meet the review's inclusion criteria and the fulltext of eligible studies will be reviewed. Data from studies that are eligible for inclusion will be extracted using two independent reviewers and presented in a tabular form with an accompanying narrative summary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily K Drake
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Lori E Weeks
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, Halifax, NS, Canada.,School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Michael van Manen
- John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Janet Curran
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, Halifax, NS, Canada.,School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shelley McKibbon
- Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, Halifax, NS, Canada.,W.K. Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fonseca R, Carvalho M, Querido A, Figueiredo MH, Bally J, Charepe Z. Therapeutic letters: A qualitative study exploring their influence on the hope of parents of children receiving pediatric palliative care in Portugal. J SPEC PEDIATR NURS 2021; 26:e12325. [PMID: 33493386 DOI: 10.1111/jspn.12325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore the hope experiences of parents of children diagnosed with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) who received therapeutic letters. DESIGN AND METHODS A purposive sample of 10 parents of inpatient children with CCCs was recruited from a pediatric palliative care unit in a Portuguese public hospital. A demographic form and audio-recorded semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with each participant to explore the experiences, processes, and meanings of hope, and to describe how parents of children receiving pediatric palliative care perceived the usefulness of receiving therapeutic letters. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and using a thematic analysis, a systematic approach to data analysis was completed. FINDINGS Data analysis resulted in three main themes including Trust in the Future; Strengthening Hope; and Moments of Hope. Findings highlight the positive influence of therapeutic letters including supporting parental hope, facilitating personal inner-strengthening, recognition of parental skills, and promotion of self-efficacy during hospitalization. The themes and related subthemes add value to the existing literature and highlight the need for supportive palliative nursing care aimed at promoting parental hope. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS To optimize the value of supporting parental hope, therapeutic letters can be delivered at the time of diagnosis, during times of celebration, and when learning the difficult tasks of daily childcare. Additional research can inform the development of a formal hope-based intervention to provide an evidence base from which to enhance the well-being of parental caregivers of children who have CCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Fonseca
- Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Matilde Carvalho
- Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Querido
- Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Superior School of Health, Leiria, Portugal
| | | | - Jill Bally
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Zaida Charepe
- Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|