1
|
Campbell K, Harris F, Stoddart K. The Hematology Cancer Patient Experience of "Facing Death" in the Last Year of Life: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:132-140. [PMID: 36480369 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For hematology cancer patients, the process of dying is described as "troublesome." Qualitative studies have focused on views of healthcare professionals and caregiver stakeholders. To date, there have been no studies from the patient's perspective on facing death while in the last year of life. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop an understanding of the hematology cancer patient's experience of the process of dying in the last year of life. METHODS The study method was constructivist grounded theory using semistructured interviews, a constant comparison technique, and memoing to collection and analysis of data. The 21 participants were attending a UK cancer center, a cancer unit, or a hospice. RESULTS This article describes 1 core category within the incurable hematology cancer illness trajectory through 4 subcategories: transitional phase, chronic phase, dying phase, and liminal phase. CONCLUSION This unique study illustrates that, although life can be prolonged, "facing death" still occurs upon hospitalization and relapse regularly over the illness trajectory. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE It is important that clinical practice acknowledges those participants in an incurable illness trajectory while living are focused on avoiding death rather than the ability to cure the disease. Services need to be responsive to the ambiguity of both living and dying by providing holistic management simultaneously, especially after critical episodes of care, to enhance the process of care in the last year of life, and assessment should incorporate the discussion of experiencing life-threatening events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Campbell
- Author Affiliations: Edinburgh Napier University (Dr Campbell); Professor, University of West of Scotland (Dr Harris); and University of Stirling (Dr Stoddart), Scotland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sannemann L, Bach L, Hower KI, Ihle P, Keller K, Leikert C, Leminski C, Meixner A, Meyer I, Nordmeyer L, Peltzer S, Peter S, Werner B, Kuntz L, Pfaff H, Schulz-Nieswandt F, Albus C, Jessen F. Effects of a Primary Care-Based Intervention on the Identification and Management of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Mental or Cognitive Comorbidity-A Study Protocol. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:ijerph20105814. [PMID: 37239541 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Mental and cognitive disorders (MCD) negatively affect the incidence and prognosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Medical guidelines recommend the appropriate management of comorbid MCD in patients with CHD, yet there is evidence that the implementation in primary care is not always adequate. We present the protocol for a pilot study that aims to develop a minimally invasive intervention and evaluate its feasibility in the primary care setting to improve the identification and management of comorbid MCD in patients with CHD. The study consists of two consecutive parts and will be carried out in Cologne, Germany. Part 1 comprises the development and tailoring of the intervention, which is guided by qualitative interviews with primary care physicians (PCPs, n = 10), patients with CHD and MCD and patient representatives (n = 10). Part II focuses on the implementation and evaluation of the intervention in n = 10 PCP offices. Changes in PCP behaviour will be analysed by comparing routine data in the practice management system six months before and six months after study participation. In addition, we will explore the influence of organisational characteristics and perform a socio-economic impact assessment. The outcomes of this mixed-method study will inform the feasibility of a PCP-based intervention to improve quality of care in patients with CHD and comorbid MCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Sannemann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Lisa Bach
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kira Isabel Hower
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Ihle
- PMV Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Herderstraße 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kai Keller
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
| | - Charlotte Leikert
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Weyertal 76, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christin Leminski
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
| | - Adriana Meixner
- Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Ingo Meyer
- PMV Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Herderstraße 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Laura Nordmeyer
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Weyertal 76, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Samia Peltzer
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Weyertal 76, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sophie Peter
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
- Chair of General Practice II and Patient-Centredness in Primary Care, Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58455 Witten, Germany
| | - Belinda Werner
- Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology (ISS), Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Ludwig Kuntz
- Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany
- Centre for Health Services Research Cologne (ZVFK), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Pfaff
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
- Centre for Health Services Research Cologne (ZVFK), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Schulz-Nieswandt
- Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology (ISS), Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Albus
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Weyertal 76, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924 Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Venusberg-Campus 1/99, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 26, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
White N, Oostendorp LJ, Vickerstaff V, Gerlach C, Engels Y, Maessen M, Tomlinson C, Wens J, Leysen B, Biasco G, Zambrano S, Eychmüller S, Avgerinou C, Chattat R, Ottoboni G, Veldhoven C, Stone P. An online international comparison of palliative care identification in primary care using the Surprise Question. Palliat Med 2022; 36:142-151. [PMID: 34596445 PMCID: PMC8796152 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211048340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Surprise Question ('Would I be surprised if this patient died within 12 months?') identifies patients in the last year of life. It is unclear if 'surprised' means the same for each clinician, and whether their responses are internally consistent. AIM To determine the consistency with which the Surprise Question is used. DESIGN A cross-sectional online study of participants located in Belgium, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Switzerland and UK. Participants completed 20 hypothetical patient summaries ('vignettes'). Primary outcome measure: continuous estimate of probability of death within 12 months (0% [certain survival]-100% [certain death]). A threshold (probability estimate above which Surprise Question responses were consistently 'no') and an inconsistency range (range of probability estimates where respondents vacillated between responses) were calculated. Univariable and multivariable linear regression explored differences in consistency. Trial registration: NCT03697213. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Registered General Practitioners (GPs). Of the 307 GPs who started the study, 250 completed 15 or more vignettes. RESULTS Participants had a consistency threshold of 49.8% (SD 22.7) and inconsistency range of 17% (SD 22.4). Italy had a significantly higher threshold than other countries (p = 0.002). There was also a difference in threshold levels depending on age of clinician, for every yearly increase, participants had a higher threshold. There was no difference in inconsistency between countries (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS There is variation between clinicians regarding the use of the Surprise Question. Over half of GPs were not internally consistent in their responses to the Surprise Question. Future research with standardised terms and real patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola White
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Linda Jm Oostendorp
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,Primary Care and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christina Gerlach
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, and Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Yvonne Engels
- Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maud Maessen
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Tomlinson
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Johan Wens
- Department Family Medicine and Population Health (FamPop), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Bert Leysen
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Guido Biasco
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna & Academy of the Sciences of Palliative Medicine, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sofia Zambrano
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Steffen Eychmüller
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christina Avgerinou
- Primary Care and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rabih Chattat
- Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Carel Veldhoven
- Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wedding U. Palliative care of patients with haematological malignancies: strategies to overcome difficulties via integrated care. THE LANCET HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2021; 2:e746-e753. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00213-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
5
|
Tripp D, Janis J, Jarrett B, Lucas FL, Strout TD, Han PKJ, Stumpf I, Hutchinson RN. How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD? J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:2656-2662. [PMID: 33409886 PMCID: PMC8390592 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often receive burdensome care at end-of-life (EOL) and infrequently complete advance care planning (ACP). The surprise question (SQ) is a prognostic tool that may facilitate ACP. OBJECTIVE To assess how well the SQ predicts mortality and prompts ACP for COPD patients. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS Patients admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of COPD between July 2015 and September 2018. MAIN MEASURES Emergency department (ED) and inpatient clinicians answered, "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 30 days (ED)/one year (inpatient)?" The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of the SQ in predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality. The secondary outcome was the correlation between SQ and ACP (palliative care consultation, documented goals-of-care conversation, change in code status, or completion of ACP document). KEY RESULTS The 30-day SQ had a high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting 30-day mortality: sensitivity 12%, specificity 95%, PPV 11%, and NPV 96%. The 1-year SQ demonstrated better accuracy for predicting 1-year mortality: sensitivity 47%, specificity 75%, PPV 35%, and NPV 83%. After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and prior 6-month admissions, 1-year SQ+ responses were associated with greater odds of 1-year mortality (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.39-4.08) versus SQ-. One-year SQ+ patients were more likely to have a goals-of-care conversation (25% vs. 11%, p < 0.01) and complete an advance directive or POLST (46% vs. 23%, p < 0.01). After multivariable adjustment, SQ+ responses to the 1-year SQ were associated with greater odds of ACP receipt (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.64-4.36). CONCLUSIONS The 1-year surprise question may be an effective component of prognostication and advance care planning for COPD patients in the inpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Tripp
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jaclyn Janis
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Benjamin Jarrett
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - F Lee Lucas
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Tania D Strout
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Paul K J Han
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Isabella Stumpf
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Rebecca N Hutchinson
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. .,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA. .,Division of Palliative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kasdorf A, Dust G, Vennedey V, Rietz C, Polidori MC, Voltz R, Strupp J. What are the risk factors for avoidable transitions in the last year of life? A qualitative exploration of professionals' perspectives for improving care in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:147. [PMID: 33588851 PMCID: PMC7885553 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06138-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about the nature of patients’ transitions between healthcare settings in the last year of life (LYOL) in Germany. Patients often experience transitions between different healthcare settings, such as hospitals and long-term facilities including nursing homes and hospices. The perspective of healthcare professionals can therefore provide information on transitions in the LYOL that are avoidable from a medical perspective. This study aims to explore factors influencing avoidable transitions across healthcare settings in the LYOL and to disclose how these could be prevented. Methods Two focus groups (n = 11) and five individual interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals working in hospitals, hospices and nursing services from Cologne, Germany. They were asked to share their observations about avoidable transitions in the LYOL. The data collection continued until the point of information power was reached and were audio recorded and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four factors for potentially avoidable transitions between care settings in the LYOL were identified: healthcare system, organization, healthcare professional, patient and relatives. According to the participants, the most relevant aspects that can aid in reducing unnecessary transitions include timely identification and communication of the LYOL; consideration of palliative care options; availability and accessibility of care services; and having a healthcare professional taking main responsibility for care planning. Conclusions Preventing avoidable transitions by considering the multicomponent factors related to them not only immediately before death but also in the LYOL could help to provide more value-based care for patients and improving their quality of life. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06138-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Kasdorf
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Gloria Dust
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vera Vennedey
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Rietz
- Department of Educational Science and Mixed-Methods-Research, University of Education Heidelberg, Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria C Polidori
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Cologne Center for Molecular Medicine, Ageing Clinical Research, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence CECAD, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Raymond Voltz
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.,Clinical Trials Center (ZKS), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Strupp
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ikari T, Hiratsuka Y, Yamaguchi T, Maeda I, Mori M, Uneno Y, Taniyama T, Matsuda Y, Oya K, Tagami K, Inoue A. "3-Day Surprise Question" to predict prognosis of advanced cancer patients with impending death: Multicenter prospective observational study. Cancer Med 2020; 10:1018-1026. [PMID: 33347734 PMCID: PMC7897938 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The study aimed to clarify the efficacy of the “3‐Day Surprise Question (3DSQ)” in predicting the prognosis for advanced cancer patients with impending death. Patients and Methods This study was a part of multicenter prospective observational study which investigated the dying process in advanced cancer patients in Japan. For patients with a Palliative Performance Scale ≤20, the 3DSQ “Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 3 days?” was answered by their physicians. In addition to the sensitivity and specificity of the 3DSQ, the characteristics of patients who survived longer than expected were examined via multivariate analysis. Results Among the 1896 patients enrolled, 1411 were evaluated. Among 1179 (83.6%) patients who were classified into the “Not surprised” group, 636 patients died within 3 days. Among 232 (16.4%) patients of “Yes surprised” group, 194 patients lived longer than 3 days. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the 3DSQ were 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.7% to 95.8%), 26.3% (95% CI: 24.8% to 27.6%), 53.9% (95% CI: 53.0% to 54.7%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 78.7% to 87.7%), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed palpable radial artery, absent respiration with mandibular movement, SpO2 ≥ 90%, opioid administration, and no continuous deep sedation as characteristics of patients who lived longer than expected. Conclusions The 3‐Day Surprise Question can be a useful screening tool to identify advanced cancer patients with impending death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoo Ikari
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yusuke Hiratsuka
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Isseki Maeda
- Department of Palliative Care, Senri-Chuo Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan
| | - Masanori Mori
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yu Uneno
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Taniyama
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yosuke Matsuda
- Palliative Care Department, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyofumi Oya
- Aso Iizuka Hospital, Transitional and Palliative Care, Iizuka ciyu, Japan
| | - Keita Tagami
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akira Inoue
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dowling M, Fahy P, Houghton C, Smalle M. A qualitative evidence synthesis of healthcare professionals' experiences and views of palliative care for patients with a haematological malignancy. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 29:10.1111/ecc.13316. [PMID: 32902114 PMCID: PMC7757223 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with haematological malignancies may not be receiving appropriate referrals to palliative care and continuing to have treatments in the end stages of their disease. This systematic review of qualitative research aimed to synthesise healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views and experiences of palliative care for adult patients with a haematologic malignancy. METHODS A systematic search strategy was undertaken across eight databases. Thomas and Harden's approach to thematic analysis guided synthesis on the seventeen included studies. GRADE-GRADEQual guided assessment of confidence in the synthesised findings. RESULTS Three analytic themes were identified: (a) "Maybe we can pull another 'rabbit out of the hat'," represents doctors' therapeutic optimism, (b) "To tell or not to tell?" explores doctors' decision-making around introducing palliative care, and (c) "Hospice, home or hospital?" describes HCPs concerns about challenges faced by haematology patients at end of life in terms of transfusion support and risk of catastrophic bleeds. CONCLUSION Haematologists value the importance of integrated palliative care but prefer the term "supportive care." Early integration of supportive care alongside active curative treatment should be the model of choice in haematology settings in order to achieve the best outcomes and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura Dowling
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
| | - Paul Fahy
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
| | - Mike Smalle
- James Hardiman LibraryNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rauh LA, Sullivan MW, Camacho F, Janke MJ, Duska LR, Chandler C, Sukumvanich P, Courtney-Brooks M, Lefkowits C. Validation of the surprise question in gynecologic oncology: A one-question screen to promote palliative care integration and advance care planning. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:754-758. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
10
|
Verhoef MJ, de Nijs EJM, Fiocco M, Heringhaus C, Horeweg N, van der Linden YM. Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study. J Palliat Med 2019; 23:801-808. [PMID: 31880489 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The surprise question (SQ), "Would I be surprised if this patient died within one year?", is a simple instrument to identify patients with palliative care needs. The SQ-performance has not been evaluated in patients with advanced cancer visiting the emergency department (ED). Objective: To evaluate SQ's test characteristics and predictive value in patients with advanced cancer visiting the ED. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Patients >18 years with advanced cancer in the palliative phase visiting the ED of an academic medical center. Methods: Attending physicians answered the SQ (not surprised [NS] or surprised [S]) and estimated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-performance status. Disease, visit, and follow-up characteristics were retrospectively collected from charts. SQ's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and Harrell's c-index were calculated. Prognostic values of SQ and other variables were assessed by using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Two-hundred-and-forty-five patients were included (203 NS [83%] and 42 S [17%]), median age 62 years, 48% male. Follow-up on overall survival was updated until February 2019. At ED entry, NS-patients had worse ECOG-performance and more symptoms. At study closure, 233 patients had died (95%). Median survival was three months for NS-patients (interquartile [IQ]-range: 1-8); nine months for S-patients (IQ-range: 3-28) (p < 0.0001). SQ-performance for one-year mortality: sensitivity 89%, specificity 40%, PPV 85%, NPV 50%, c-index 0.56, and hazard ratio 2.1 for approaching death. ECOG 3-4 predicted death in NS-patients; addition to the SQ improved c-index (0.65); sensitivity (40%), specificity (92%), PPV (95%), and NPV (29%). Conclusions: At the ED, the SQ plus ECOG 3-4 helps identifying patients with advanced cancer and a limited life expectancy. Its use supports initiating appropriate care related to urgency of palliative care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Joanne Verhoef
- Center of Expertise Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen J M de Nijs
- Center of Expertise Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Heringhaus
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nanda Horeweg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Yvette M van der Linden
- Center of Expertise Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Specific challenges in end-of-life care for patients with hematological malignancies. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 13:369-379. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|