Discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate, a 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C agonist: a study in rats

Indorenate modifies a1-adrenergic and benzodiazepine receptor binding in the rat brain: an autoradiography study

Indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine-beta-methylcarboxylate) is a 5-HT1A receptor agonist that produces antihypertensive, anxiolytic, antidepressant and anticonvulsant effects. However, there is evidence suggesting that these effects could involve the activation of benzodiazepine (BZD) receptors but not the activation of a1-adrenergic receptors. The goal of this study was to analyse the effect of indorenate on a1-adrenergic and BZD receptor binding in specific rat brain areas by using in-vitro autoradiography. Coronal brain sections from male Wistar rats were used for labelling 5-HT1A (3H-8-OH-DPAT, 2 nM), a1-adrenergic (3H-prazosin, 2 nM) and BZD (3H-flunitrazepam, 2 nM) receptor binding in the presence or absence of indorenate (1 microM). Indorenate totally displaced 3H-8-OH-DPAT binding in all the brain areas evaluated. It decreased 3H-prazosin binding just in the frontal (30%) and sensorimotor (32%) cortices and in the thalamus (21%). Additionally, indorenate diminished 3H-flunitrazepam binding only in the cingulate (16%) and piriform (18%) cortices as well as in the dorsal raphe nucleus (18%). These results confirm that indorenate is a 5-HT1A ligand and suggest the possible participation of a1-adrenergic and BZD receptors in its pharmacological properties.

Discriminative stimulus effects of m-chlorophenylpiperazine as a model of the role of serotonin receptors in anxiety

Serotonin is known to play a role in anxiety. The roles of serotonin reuptake and 5-HT1A receptors have been well characterized, but the contribution of other serotonin receptor subtypes is not as clear. 1-(3-Chlorophenyl)-piperazine (mCPP), which binds non-selectively to a wide range of serotonin receptors, has often been used to produce anxiety in humans and in animal models. Because functional assays indicate that mCPP is significantly more potent at 5-HT2C receptors, it may serve as a tool to investigate the contribution of 5-HT2C receptors to anxiety. This paper reviews the results of behavioral tests using mCPP, including the drug discrimination assay, to model anxiety. Although the discriminative stimulus effects of mCPP do not seem to be a useful screen for general anxiolytics, they do seem to be useful for characterization of the contribution of 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C receptors to the mediation of anxiety-like behaviors.

Further evidence that the discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate are mediated by 5-HT 1A/1B/2C receptors

Indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate, INDO) is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) agonist that has affinity for 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors. Unlike other anxiolytics such as 5-HT receptor agonists, INDO may not share tolerance or dependency with the benzodiazepine anxiolytics. It has been reported that the discriminative stimulus properties of 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) agonists, but not those of 5-HT(3/4) agonists, generalize to INDO. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to obtain further evidence on the differential involvement of 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO by evaluating its interactions with antagonists of the 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(2C), and 5-HT(3/4) receptor subtypes. Rats were trained to discriminate INDO from saline in a conditioned taste aversion paradigm. For Group D(+)S(-), administration of INDO signalled that saccharin flavour was followed by LiCl, while injection of vehicle signalled safe consumption of saccharin solution. Group D(-)S(+) had the contingencies reversed. After this training, rats had generalization tests where INDO administration was preceded by different doses of the following antagonists: WAY100635 (5-HT(1A)), NAN190 (5-HT(1A)), methiothepin (5-HT(1A/1B/2C)), GR127935 (5-HT(1B/1D)), ketanserin (5-HT(2A/2C)), ritanserin (5-HT(2C/2A)), mesulergine (5-HT(2C/2A)), metergoline (5-HT(2C/2A)), SB206553 (5-HT(2B/2C)), and tropisetron (5-HT(3/4)). In Group D(+)S(-), the order of potency to block the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO was WAY100635>ketanserin>ritanserin>GR127935>mesulergine congruent with SB206553>metergoline>methiothepin>NAN190, while in Group D(-)S(+), the order was WAY100635>GR127935>ketanserin>ritanserin>mesulergine congruent with SB206553>metergoline>methiothepin>NAN190. Tropisetron did not produce any alteration of the discriminative control by INDO. These results suggest that the discriminative signal of INDO is mediated by 5-HT(1A/2C/1B) receptors and that blockade of any of its components produces a degradation of its discriminative effects.

Full substitution of the discriminative cue of a 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) agonist with the combined administration of a 5-HT(1B/2C) and a 5-HT(1A) agonist

The present study examined whether animals attend to the individual components of the cue produced by a drug that stimulates different 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor populations, using a drug discrimination task based on the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure. The training drug was indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate) (INDO) that has been described as a 5-HT(1A/2C/1B) agonist able to exert discriminative control in both operant and CTA procedures. The principal objective was to examine generalization with the combined administration of agonists for the different receptor sites that may mimic the mechanism of action of the training drug. Male Wistar rats, deprived of water, were trained to discriminate INDO from saline; during the drug trials, the administration of INDO preceded saccharin-LiCl pairings, while, during the saline trials, the administration of saline preceded the saccharin-saline pairings. In generalization tests, INDO, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT(1A) agonist), 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP, a 5-HT(1B) agonist), alpha-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(2C) agonist) or 2-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(3) agonist), were administered alone or in combination. The results showed that 8-OH-DPAT, TFMPP and alpha-methyl-5-HT produced dose-dependent generalization, up to 88% in the case of 8-OH-DPAT. The combined administration of the following pairs of drugs, 8-OH-DPAT+TFMPP or 8-OH-DPAT+ alpha-methyl-5-HT, at doses that produced only 15-55% generalization when administered alone, produced greater than 80% generalization to INDO. However, the single administration of 2-methyl-5-HT produced only saline-like responding and its combined administration with 8-OH-DPAT did not modify the generalization produced by the single administration of 8-OH-DPAT. These results suggest that animals attend to the individual components of the drug cue; in the case of INDO, which has three elements, each mediated by a different receptor subpopulation (5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(2C) ), the separate stimulation of at least two receptor subpopulations was 'interpreted' by the subject as the presence of the training drug.