Scopolamine-induced amnesia in humans: lack of effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist β-carboline ZK 93426

Cross State-dependent Learning Interaction Between Scopolamine and Morphine in Mice: The Role of Dorsal Hippocampus

INTRODUCTION

The current study aimed at investigating the existence of the cross state-dependent learning between morphine and scopolamine (SCO) in mice by passive avoidance method, pointing to the role of CA1 area.

METHODS

The effects of pre-training SCO (0.75, 1.5, and 3 μg, Intra-CA1), or morphine (1, 3, and 6 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.) was evaluated on the retrieval of passive avoidance learning using step-down task in mice (n=10). Then, the effect of pretest administration of morphine (1.5, 3, and 6 mg/kg, i.p.) was examined on passive avoidance retrieval impairment induced by pre-training SCO (3 μg/mice, Intra-CA1). Next, the effect of pretest Intra-CA1 injection of scopolamine (0.75, 1.5, and 3 μg/mice) was evaluated on morphine (6 mg/kg, i.p.) pre-training deficits in this task in mice.

RESULTS

The pre-training Intra-CA1 injection of scopolamine (1.5 and 3 μg/mouse), or morphine (3 and 6 mg/kg, i.p.) impaired the avoidance memory retrieval when it was tested 24 hours later. Pretest injection of both drugs improved its pre-training impairing effects on mice memory. Moreover, the amnesia induced by the pre-training injections of scopolamine (3 μg/mice) was restored significantly (P<0.01) by pretest injections of morphine (3 and 6 mg/kg, i.p.). Similarly, pretest injection of scopolamine (3 μg/mice) restored amnesia induced by the pre-training injections of morphine (6 mg/kg, i.p.), significantly (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The current study findings indicated a cross state-dependent learning between SCO and morphine at CA1 level. Therefore, it seems that muscarinic and opioid receptors may act reciprocally on modulation of passive avoidance memory retrieval, at the level of dorsal hippocampus, in mice.

The effects of a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist beta-carboline ZK-93426 on scopolamine-induced impairment on attention, memory and psychomotor skills

The effects of a single dose of scopolamine alone and in combination with ZK 93426 (a beta-carboline antagonist at the GABAA/BZ receptor complex with weak inverse agonist activity) were tested in two studies. In one study (study 1) the emphasis of enquiry was on different stages of information processing measured by a psychometric battery; in the second study (study 2) performance at different stages of memory and psychomotor abilities was tested and electroencephalogram recordings and video-tracking were also performed. Each study consisted of two parts, part I in which scopolamine (0.5 mg; 1 ml) or placebo were administered subcutaneously, and part II in which scopolamine (0.5 mg; 1 ml) was administered subcutaneously followed by an intravenous injection of ZK 93426 (0.04 mg; 0.04 ml/kg) or placebo. Thirty-six volunteers, who were randomly allocated to receive one of the two treatments (n = 18 per treatment), participated in each part. In study 1 attention was measured by a continuous attention task and a rapid information processing task, vigilance was measured by a visual vigilance task, and working memory and reasoning were evaluated by a logical reasoning task. A visual memory task was also included to measure acquisition and retention. In study 2 acquisition and short term storage and retrieval were measured by a word lists-Buschke restricted reminding procedure, and retention was tested by delayed recall and recognition. Psychomotor performance was assessed by measuring tapping speed (related to gross motoric abilities) and a pegboard task (related to fine motoric abilities). A task to measure working memory, the Pauli test, was also included. In study 1 scopolamine significantly impaired performance in the attentional and vigilance tasks (P < 0.05), but there was no effect in the logical reasoning task main measurements of time and accuracy. In study 2, scopolamine also impaired performance in the psychomotor tasks (P < 0.05) and the Pauli test. ZK 93426 partially antagonised most of the effects of scopolamine on memory and attention, suggesting that an interaction between the GABA-ergic and cholinergic systems is reflected in measurements of both attention and memory. In general a dissociation was found in the effects of scopolamine on memory, i.e. scopolamine impaired performance during all acquisition measurements but left retention unaffected.

The effects of scopolamine, lorazepam, and glycopyrrolate on classical conditioning of the human eyeblink response

Human eyeblink conditioning, a relatively simple form of learning and memory, has previously been shown to be impaired by the central and peripheral anticholinergic scopolamine. The present study compared the behavioral effects of scopolamine with the benzodiazepine lorazepam and a peripherally active anticholinergic, glycopyrrolate. Thirty-six healthy normal volunteers (mean age: 23.7 years) were studied with 12 assigned double-blind to each of three drug conditions (0.5 mg scopolamine IV, 2 mg lorazepam PO, or 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate IV). Subjects underwent classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in which the conditioned stimulus was an 80 dB binaural tone, and the unconditioned stimulus was a 2 psi airpuff to the right eye. Ten trials of unpaired stimulus presentations were followed by 60 paired trials and finally by an extinction period of five tone-alone presentations. An eyeblink response that occurred during the tone but before the airpuff was scored as a conditioned response (CR). Subjects treated with lorazepam (43% mean CRs) and scopolamine (51% mean CRs) exhibited a significantly lower asymptotic level of conditioning than those treated with glycopyrrolate (85% mean CRs; P < 0.01). However, during extinction, lorazepam-treated subjects (35% CRs) showed a lower overall level of responding to the tone than either scopolamine (60% CRs) or glycopyrrolate (62% CRs) treated subjects (P < 0.05). It seems unlikely that these differences could be accounted for by drug-induced alterations in motor responses because there were no significant differences between the three drug conditions in the frequency, latency, or amplitude of unconditioned responses to the airpuff. Overall, our data indicate that scopolamine and lorazepam impair eyeblink conditioning and suggest that some of the effects of benzodiazepines and anticholinergics on learning and memory can be differentiated using this paradigm.

Scopolamine and lorazepam exert different patterns of effects in a test battery assessing stages of information processing

The effects of a single dose of scopolamine (0.5 mg) SC and of lorazepam (2.5 mg) PO were tested in two independent studies for their effects on performance in a psychometric battery which measured functions related to different stages of information processing. Attention and vigilance were measured by a continuous attention task and a vigilance task, respectively. Working memory and reasoning were evaluated by the rapid information processing and logical reasoning task; memory acquisition and storage were measured by pre- and post-drug immediate and delayed recall using visual material. The following pattern of effects was revealed; both scopolamine and lorazepam impaired performance in attentional and vigilance tasks as well as in the rapid information processing task significantly (P < 0.05) when compared with their own placebo; in the logical reasoning task lorazepam significantly prolonged the time required to solve a problem; scopolamine did not have any effect on this task. Scopolamine impaired performance in the immediate recall but left delayed recall unaffected; lorazepam impaired only delayed recall, immediate recall remaining unaffected. These data suggest that scopolamine at this dose impaired mostly attention and early stages of information processes; lorazepam at the dose tested impaired also the later acquisition and encoding aspects of memory.