Antibiotic prescribing decisions of generalists and infectious disease specialists: thresholds for adopting new drug therapies

Efficacy of Care and Antibiotic Use for Chalazia and Hordeola

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether use of an antibiotic improves the efficacy of care for a chalazion or hordeolum.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective review was performed. All patients treated for a newly diagnosed chalazion or hordeolum at the University of California, San Francisco from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Patients were excluded when clinical notes were inaccessible or there was inadequate documentation of treatment modality or outcome. Patient demographics, setting of initial presentation, treatment modalities, antibiotic use, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 2,712 patients met inclusion criteria. Management with an antibiotic was observed in 36.5% of patients. An antibiotic was 1.53 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.22, P=0.025) more likely to be prescribed in emergency or acute care setting for a chalazion. Older age was associated with a higher risk of receiving an antibiotic for a hordeolum (adjusted RR 1.07 per decade, 95% CI, 1.05-1.11, P<0.001). The addition of an antibiotic to conservative measures for a chalazion (adjusted RR, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.89-1.04, P=0.393) or hordeolum (adjusted RR, 0.99, 95% CI, 0.96-1.02, P=0.489) was not associated with an increased likelihood of treatment success.

CONCLUSION

Although frequently prescribed, an antibiotic is unlikely to improve the resolution of a chalazion or hordeolum.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Approaches in the Intensive Care Unit

Antimicrobial stewardship programs aim to monitor, improve, and measure responsible antibiotic use. The intensive care unit (ICU), with its critically ill patients and prevalence of multiple drug-resistant pathogens, presents unique challenges. This article reviews approaches to stewardship with application to the ICU, including the value of diagnostics, principles of empirical and definitive therapy, and measures of effectiveness. There is good evidence that antimicrobial stewardship results in more appropriate antimicrobial use, shorter therapy durations, and lower resistance rates. Data demonstrating hard clinical outcomes, such as adverse events and mortality, are more limited but encouraging; further studies are needed.

Evolution of First-generation and Second-generation Antipsychotic Prescribing Patterns in Belgium Between 1997 and 2012: A Population-based Study

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, a substantial increase in prescriptions of antipsychotics has been reported in several countries. This increase in antipsychotic sales has been attributed to the success of second-generation antipsychotics.

METHODS

This national register-based study investigated the evolution of outpatient antipsychotic sales in Belgium between 1997 and 2012. The impact of the specialization of the prescriber and the demographic characteristics of both prescribing doctors and patients were examined. The study used data obtained from the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance and IMS Health Belgium.

RESULTS

Over this 15-year period, antipsychotic sales increased by 122% in Belgium. This growth was mainly explained by a 3-fold increase in antipsychotic prescriptions by psychiatrists and neurologists. Overall, only 29.5% of prescriptions for antipsychotics were for psychotic disorders and only 26.2% of prescriptions for antipsychotics were for mood disorders, suggesting a large amount of off-label use. A significant shift toward second-generation agents was found in prescriptions by both psychiatrists and general practitioners, although there may have been a small delay in moving toward second-generation agents in the latter group. This increase in second-generation antipsychotic prescribing was mainly due to the steep rise in sales of quetiapine, followed by olanzapine and risperidone. The shift toward the newer products was also mainly seen in younger prescribers.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that there has been an increase in adequate management of patients in need of antipsychotic treatment. Nevertheless, very few of the patients received continued treatment throughout the year, which implies that few outpatients with schizophrenia are receiving adequate treatment.

Overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria: identifying provider barriers to evidence-based care

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate use of antibiotics to treat asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a significant contributor to antibiotic overuse in hospitalized patients despite evidence-based guidelines on ASB management. We surveyed whether accurate knowledge of how to manage catheter-associated urine cultures was associated with level of training, familiarity with ASB guidelines, and various cognitive-behavioral constructs.

METHODS

We used a survey to measure respondents' knowledge of how to manage catheter-associated bacteriuria, familiarity with the content of the relevant Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, and cognitive-behavioral constructs. The survey was administered to 169 residents and staff providers.

RESULTS

The mean knowledge score was 57.5%, or slightly over one-half of the questions answered correctly. The overall knowledge score improved significantly with level of training (P < .0001). Only 42% of respondents reported greater than minimal recall of ASB guideline contents. Self-efficacy, behavior, risk perceptions, social norms, and guideline familiarity were individually correlated with knowledge score (P < .01). In multivariable analysis, behavior, risk perception, and year of training were correlated with knowledge score (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of how to manage catheter-associated bacteriuria according to evidence-based guidelines increases with experience. Addressing both knowledge gaps and relevant cognitive biases early in training may decrease the inappropriate use of antibiotics to treat ASB.

Comparison of antibiograms developed for inpatients and primary care outpatients

To support antimicrobial stewardship, some healthcare systems have begun creating outpatient antibiograms. We developed inpatient and primary care outpatient antibiograms for a regional health maintenance organization (HMO) and academic healthcare system (AHS). Antimicrobial susceptibilities from 16,428 Enterococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures from 2010 were summarized and compared. Methicillin susceptibility among S. aureus was similar in inpatients and primary care outpatients (HMO: 61.2% versus 61.9%, P = 0.951; AHS: 62.9% versus 63.3%, P > 0.999). E. coli susceptibility to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was also similar (HMO: 81.8% versus 83.6%, P = 0.328; AHS: 77.2% versus 80.9%, P = 0.192), but ciprofloxacin susceptibility differed (HMO: 88.9% versus 94.6%, P < 0.001; AHS: 81.2% versus 90.6%, P < 0.001). In the HMO, ciprofloxacin-susceptible P. aeruginosa were more frequent in primary care outpatients than in inpatients (91.4% versus 79.0%, P = 0.007). Comparison of cumulative susceptibilities across settings yielded no consistent patterns; therefore, outpatient primary care antibiograms may more accurately inform prudent empiric antibiotic prescribing.

Misprescription of antibiotics in primary care: a critical systematic review of its determinants

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance is one of the principal public health problems worldwide. Currently, inappropriate use of antibiotics is regarded as the principal determinant of resistance, with most of these drugs being prescribed outside a hospital setting. This systematic review sought to identify the factors, attitudes and knowledge linked to misprescription of antibiotics.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE-PubMed and EMBASE databases. The selection criteria required that papers: (1) be published in English or Spanish; (2) designate their objective as that of addressing attitudes/knowledge or other factors related with the prescribing of antibiotics; and (3) use quality and/or quantity indicators to define misprescription. The following were excluded: any paper that used qualitative methodology and any paper that included descriptive analysis only.

RESULTS

A total of 46 papers that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. They were very heterogeneous and displayed major methodological limitations. Doctors' socio-demographic and personal factors did not appear to exert much influence. Complacency (fulfilling what professionals perceived as being patients'/parents' expectations) and, to a lesser extent, fear (fear of possible complications in the patient) were the attitudes associated with misprescription of antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Before designing interventions aimed at improving the prescription and use of antibiotics, studies are needed to identify precisely which factors influence prescribing.

A hospital-site controlled intervention using audit and feedback to implement guidelines concerning inappropriate treatment of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria

Background

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections. However, many cases treated as hospital-acquired CAUTI are actually asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU). Evidence-based guidelines recommend that providers neither screen for nor treat ABU in most catheterized patients, but there is a significant gap between these guidelines and clinical practice. Our objectives are (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of an audit and feedback intervention for increasing guideline-concordant care concerning catheter-associated ABU and (2) to measure improvements in healthcare providers' knowledge of and attitudes toward the practice guidelines associated with the intervention.

Methods/Design

The study uses a controlled pre/post design to test an intervention using audit and feedback of healthcare providers to improve their compliance with ABU guidelines. The intervention and the control sites are two VA hospitals. For objective 1 we will review medical records to measure the clinical outcomes of inappropriate screening for and treatment of catheter-associated ABU. For objective 2 we will survey providers' knowledge and attitudes. Three phases of our protocol are proposed: the first 12-month phase will involve observation of the baseline incidence of inappropriate screening for and treatment of ABU at both sites. This surveillance for clinical outcomes will continue at both sites throughout the study. Phase 2 consists of 12 months of individualized audit and feedback at the intervention site and guidelines distribution at both sites. The third phase, also over 12 months, will provide unit-level feedback at the intervention site to assess sustainability. Healthcare providers at the intervention site during phase 2 and at both sites during phase 3 will complete pre/post surveys of awareness and familiarity (knowledge), as well as of acceptance and outcome expectancy (attitudes) regarding the relevant practice guidelines.

Discussion

Our proposal to bring clinical practice in line with published guidelines has significant potential to decrease overdiagnosis of CAUTI and associated inappropriate antibiotic use. Our study will also provide information about how to maximize effectiveness of audit and feedback to achieve guideline adherence in the inpatient setting.

Trial Registration

NCT01052545

Usefulness of antibiogram surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in outpatient pediatric populations

We assessed the impact of distributing an outpatient age-specific methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiogram on physician knowledge of MRSA prevalence and choice of empiric therapy. Questionnaires were given to 125 physicians at outpatient pediatric clinics in Monroe County, NY, before and after antibiogram distribution (response rates, 42% and 24%, respectively). The median physician-estimated MRSA prevalence (among S. aureus skin infections) was 15% before they received the antibiogram and 20% after. According to the antibiogram, the true 2005 prevalence was 25% among skin infections. When asked to select empiric therapy for a pediatric outpatient with a skin abscess, while assuming varying levels of MRSA prevalence, most selected cephalexin when the prevalence was assumed to be 20% or less, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole when the prevalence was assumed to be 30% or greater. These data suggest that antibiograms may improve empiric therapy decision making by increasing knowledge of local outpatient prevalence of antibiotic resistance.

Impact of antibiotic restrictions: the ethical perspective

Antibiotic restrictions present difficult choices for physicians, patients and payors. Physicians must choose between the welfare of the patient and the directive of healthcare systems to restrict antibiotics. These may be supported with incentives or penalties, causing a conflict of interest. The patient has an expectation of best care, but will often be unaware of antibiotic restriction policies and is therefore not fully informed about his/her treatment. For payors, reducing the volume of antibiotic prescribing and/or prescribing less expensive antibiotics are apparently attractive targets for cost savings. However, we are only now beginning to understand the downstream consequences of restricting antibiotics on outcomes and costs. We are hampered by the lack of a universal ethical framework and information on outcomes. In addition, the concept of 'effective' or 'best' therapy will vary among different groups. Balancing the risks of treating or not treating with antibiotics is complex. Suboptimal therapy, that fails to eradicate the bacterial infection, exposes the patient to the risk of poor outcome, adverse events and the wider risk of antimicrobial resistance. Failure to treat where the risk of a poor outcome exceeds the risk of an adverse event is also ethically unacceptable. The key to rational antibiotic prescribing is to identify those patients who need antibiotic therapy and optimise therapy to achieve the fastest bacterial and clinical cure. We are only now beginning to assemble the information and tools to be able to make such decisions. Above all, we should treat on the basis of knowledge.

Acceptable rates of treatment failure in osteomyelitis involving the diabetic foot: a survey of infectious diseases consultants

Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy is an attractive strategy for delaying the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The paucity of data about optimal treatment durations hinders adoption of this approach. This study used contingent valuation analysis to identify failure rates for treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis acceptable to infectious diseases consultants (IDCs). The Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network (EIN) provided members with the case scenario and 1 of 10 failure rates; members were asked, assuming delivery of standard therapy, if they would accept or reject the given failure rate. The relationship between specific failure rates and the willingness of IDCs to accept them was analyzed. The median acceptable failure rate for EIN members was 18.1%; 75% of IDCs found a failure rate of 7.8% to be acceptable, and 25% found a rate of 28.4% to be acceptable. The methodology used in this study may prove useful in delineating acceptable treatment failure thresholds, an initial step in shortening durations of antimicrobial therapy.