1
|
Sekine Y, Kawaguchi T, Kunimoto Y, Masuda J, Numata A, Hirano A, Yagura H, Ishihara M, Hikasa S, Tsukiji M, Miyaji T, Yamaguchi T, Kinai E, Amano K. Adherence to anti-retroviral therapy, decisional conflicts, and health-related quality of life among treatment-naïve individuals living with HIV: a DEARS-J observational study. J Pharm Health Care Sci 2023; 9:9. [PMID: 36859482 PMCID: PMC9979481 DOI: 10.1186/s40780-023-00277-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supporting people living with HIV using anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is important due to the requirement for strict medication adherence. To date, no data from longitudinal studies evaluating adherence by treatment-naïve people living with HIV are currently available. We investigated the adherence of treatment-naïve people living with HIV over time and examined the relationships among decisional conflicts, adherence, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS The survey items included adherence (visual analogue scale [VAS]), decisional conflict (decisional conflict scale [DCS]), and HRQL (Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey [MOS-HIV]). The DCS and MOS-HIV scores and the VAS and MOS scores were collected electronically at the ART initiation time point and at 4-, 24-, and 48-week post-treatment time points. RESULTS A total of 215 participants were enrolled. The mean DCS score was 27.3 (SD, 0.9); 23.3% of participants were in the high-score and 36.7% in the low-score groups. The mean adherence rates at 4, 24, and 48 weeks were 99.2% (standard error [SE], 0.2), 98.4% (SE, 0.4), and 96.0% (SE, 1.2), respectively. The least-square means of the MOS-HIV for the DCS (high vs. low scores) were 64.4 vs. 69.2 for general health perceptions and 57.7 vs. 64.0 for HRQL, respectively. CONCLUSION Adherence among treatment-naïve people living with HIV was maintained at a higher level, and HRQL tended to improve with ART. People with high levels of decisional conflict tended to have lower HRQL scores. Support for people living with HIV during ART initiation may be related to HRQL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Sekine
- Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
| | - Takashi Kawaguchi
- grid.410785.f0000 0001 0659 6325Department of Practical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kunimoto
- grid.470107.5Department of Pharmacy, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Junichi Masuda
- grid.45203.300000 0004 0489 0290Department of Pharmacy, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayako Numata
- grid.45203.300000 0004 0489 0290Department of Pharmacy, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Hirano
- grid.410840.90000 0004 0378 7902Department of Pharmacy, National Hospital organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yagura
- grid.416803.80000 0004 0377 7966Department of Pharmacy, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masashi Ishihara
- grid.411704.7Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shinichi Hikasa
- grid.272264.70000 0000 9142 153XDepartment of Pharmacy, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mariko Tsukiji
- grid.411321.40000 0004 0632 2959Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tempei Miyaji
- grid.69566.3a0000 0001 2248 6943Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- grid.69566.3a0000 0001 2248 6943Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Ei Kinai
- grid.410793.80000 0001 0663 3325Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kagehiro Amano
- grid.410793.80000 0001 0663 3325Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alarcon-Ruiz CA, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Diaz-Barrera ME, Becerra-Chauca N, Toro-Huamanchumo CJ, Pacheco-Mendoza J, Taype-Rondan A, De La Cruz-Vargas JA. Effects of decision aids for depression treatment in adults: systematic review. BJPsych Bull 2022; 46:42-51. [PMID: 33371926 PMCID: PMC8914992 DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2020.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM AND METHOD To determine the effect on decisional-related and clinical outcomes of decision aids for depression treatment in adults in randomised clinical trials. In January 2019, a systematic search was conducted in five databases. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-analyses were performed, and standardised and weighted mean differences were calculated, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated with GRADE methodology. RESULTS Six randomised clinical trials were included. The pooled estimates showed that decision aids for depression treatment had a beneficial effect on patients' decisional conflict, patient knowledge and information exchange between patient and health professional. However, no statistically significant effect was found for doctor facilitation, treatment adherence or depressive symptoms. The certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Using decision aids to choose treatment in patients with depression may have a a beneficial effect on decisional-related outcomes, but it may not translate into an improvement in clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoper A Alarcon-Ruiz
- Faculty of Human Medicine, Ricardo Palma University, Peru.,Institute for Research in Biomedical Sciences, Ricardo Palma University, Peru
| | | | - Mario E Diaz-Barrera
- SOCEMUNT Scientific Society of Medical Students, National University of Trujillo, Peru
| | | | - Carlos J Toro-Huamanchumo
- Research Unit for Generation and Synthesis Evidence in Health, Saint Ignacio of Loyola University, Peru.,Multidisciplinary Research Unit, Avendaño Medical Center, Peru
| | | | - Alvaro Taype-Rondan
- Research Unit for Generation and Synthesis Evidence in Health, Saint Ignacio of Loyola University, Peru
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bansback N, Chiu JA, Metcalfe R, Lapointe E, Schabas A, Lenzen M, Traboulsee A, Lynd LD, Carruthers R. Preliminary testing of a patient decision aid for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2021; 7:20552173211029966. [PMID: 34350027 PMCID: PMC8287362 DOI: 10.1177/20552173211029966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple first-line disease modifying therapies (DMTs) are available for
relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), each with different
characteristics. We developed an interactive patient decision aid (PtDA) to
promote informed shared decision-making (SDM). Objective To test the preliminary effectiveness of the PtDA in participants with
RRMS. Methods Knowledge, and decisional conflict were measured pre- and post-
implementation of the PtDA, SDM after the consultation, and 6-month
treatment patterns were observed. Differences in scores were analyzed using
descriptive statistics and paired t-tests. Qualitative interviews with
patients and neurologists were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results 52 participants were recruited: most were female (81%), 40 years of age or
younger (62%), and had experienced MS for less than 5 years (56%). After
participants used the PtDA, there was a significant improvement in
decisional conflict (change = 1.00; p < 0.001) and
knowledge (change = 2.15, p < 0.001). Nearly all patients wanted SDM, and
25 (56%) reported this occurred in their consult. Qualitative results
suggested the PtDA supported both patients and neurologists in making
decisions. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that PtDA use helps RRMS patients and their
clinician select a DMT. Future studies will assess the feasibility of
implementation and the impact of the PtDA on timely DMT initiation and
longer-term adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Bansback
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Judy A Chiu
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Rebecca Metcalfe
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Alice Schabas
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Anthony Traboulsee
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Larry D Lynd
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Robert Carruthers
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kremer IEH, Hiligsmann M, Carlson J, Zimmermann M, Jongen PJ, Evers SMAA, Petersohn S, Pouwels XGLV, Bansback N. Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model. Med Decis Making 2021; 40:1003-1019. [PMID: 33174513 PMCID: PMC7672783 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20961091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Up to 31% of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) discontinue treatment with disease-modifying drug (DMD) within the first year, and of the patients who do continue, about 40% are nonadherent. Shared decision making may decrease nonadherence and discontinuation rates, but evidence in the context of RRMS is limited. Shared decision making may, however, come at additional costs. This study aimed to explore the potential cost-effectiveness of shared decision making for RRMS in comparison with usual care, from a (limited) societal perspective over a lifetime. Methods An exploratory economic evaluation was conducted by adapting a previously developed state transition model that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a range of DMDs for RRMS in comparison with the best supportive care. Three potential effects of shared decision making were explored: 1) a change in the initial DMD chosen, 2) a decrease in the patient’s discontinuation in using the DMD, and 3) an increase in adherence to the DMD. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of a scenario that combined the 3 effects were conducted. Results Each effect separately and the 3 effects combined resulted in higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs due to the increased utilization of DMD. A decrease in discontinuation of DMDs influenced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) most. The combined scenario resulted in an ICER of €17,875 per QALY gained. The ICER was sensitive to changes in several parameters. Conclusion This study suggests that shared decision making for DMDs could potentially be cost-effective, especially if shared decision making would help to decrease treatment discontinuation. Our results, however, may depend on the assumed effects on treatment choice, persistence, and adherence, which are actually largely unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid E H Kremer
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Josh Carlson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Peter J Jongen
- MS4 Research Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.,Centre for Economic Evaluations, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Svenja Petersohn
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier G L V Pouwels
- Department of Health Technology & Services Research, Faculty of Behavioral, Management & Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Nick Bansback
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kremer IEH, Jongen PJ, Evers SMAA, Hoogervorst ELJ, Verhagen WIM, Hiligsmann M. Patient decision aid based on multi-criteria decision analysis for disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis: prototype development. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:123. [PMID: 33836742 PMCID: PMC8033667 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01479-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Since decision making about treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is preference sensitive, shared decision making between patient and healthcare professional should take place. Patient decision aids could support this shared decision making process by providing information about the disease and the treatment options, to elicit the patient’s preference and to support patients and healthcare professionals in discussing these preferences and matching them with a treatment. Therefore, a prototype of a patient decision aid for MS patients in the Netherlands—based on the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) —was developed, following the recommendations of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. MCDA was chosen as it might reduce cognitive burden of considering treatment options and matching patient preferences with the treatment options. Results After determining the scope to include DMDs labelled for relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome, users’ informational needs were assessed using focus groups (N = 19 patients) and best-worst scaling surveys with patients (N = 185), neurologists and nurses (N = 60) to determine which information about DMDs should be included in the patient decision aid. Next, an online format and computer-based delivery of the patient decision aid was chosen to enable embedding of MCDA. A literature review was conducting to collect evidence on the effectiveness and burden of use of the DMDs. A prototype was developed next, and alpha testing to evaluate its comprehensibility and usability with in total thirteen patients and four healthcare professionals identified several issues regarding content and framing, methods for weighting importance of criteria in the MCDA structure, and the presentation of the conclusions of the patient decision aid ranking the treatment options according to the patient’s preferences. Adaptations were made accordingly, but verification of the rankings provided, validation of the patient decision aid, evaluation of the feasibility of implementation and assessing its value for supporting shared decision making should be addressed in further development of the patient decision aid. Conclusion This paper aimed to provide more transparency regarding the developmental process of an MCDA-based patient decision aid for treatment decisions for MS and the challenges faced during this process. Issues identified in the prototype were resolved as much as possible, though some issues remain. Further development is needed to overcome these issues before beta pilot testing with patients and healthcare professionals at the point of clinical decision-making can take place to ultimately enable making conclusions about the value of the MCDA-based patient decision aid for MS patients, healthcare professionals and the quality of care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01479-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I E H Kremer
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - P J Jongen
- MS4 Research Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Public Mental Health, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E L J Hoogervorst
- Department of Neurology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W I M Verhagen
- Department of Neurology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kang GCY, Koh EYL, Tan NC. Prevalence and factors associated with adherence to anti-hypertensives among adults with hypertension in a developed Asian community: A cross-sectional study. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2010105820933305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Poor adherence to anti-hypertensive medications (AHM) results in hypertension treatment failure. Understanding and addressing the factors associated with adherence to AHM may potentially improve health outcomes. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors associated with patients’ adherence to AHM in a developed Asian community. Methods: An assistant-administered questionnaire survey was conducted on multi-ethnic Asian adults aged 31–80 years with essential hypertension based on their electronic health records (EHR) at a public primary-care clinic. Data on their demographic characteristics, clinical measurements of blood pressure and body mass index, co-morbidities and prescriptions from the EHR, along with the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 scores were collated, audited and analysed. A MARS-5 score of <25 indicated poor adherence. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with adherence to AHM. Results: Data of 395 patients were analysed. Of these, 179 (45.3%) had poor adherence to at least one AHM. Bivariate analysis showed that poor adherence was significantly associated with lower mean age (59 years old vs. 63 years old), higher mean clinic diastolic blood pressure (76 mmHg vs. 73 mmHg) and higher mean weight (70.4 kg vs. 67.4 kg). Logistic regression showed that patients with no co-morbidities (such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, stroke and ischaemic heart disease) had better medication adherence (MA; odds ratio=1.98; 95% confidence interval 1.14–3.45; p=0.02). There was no significant MA difference between the classes, dose frequency and number of AHM. Conclusion: Almost half of the patients had poor adherence to at least one AHM. Co-morbidity significantly influenced their MA. Attention should be directed to patients with co-morbidities to assess their AHM adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Chun Yun Kang
- SingHealth Polyclinics (SHP), Singapore
- SingHealth-Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Ngiap Chuan Tan
- SingHealth Polyclinics (SHP), Singapore
- SingHealth-Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Espinosa R, Clark P, Denova-Gutiérrez E, de Los Ángeles Aguilera-Barreiro M, Flores M, Diez P, Jasqui S, Del Pilar De la Peña M, Cisneros-Dreinhofer F, Lavielle P, Mercado V. Prevention of low bone mass to achieve high bone density in Mexico: position of the Mexican Association for Bone and Mineral Metabolism. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13:105. [PMID: 30306345 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0520-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In Mexico, osteoporosis is a public health problem. In this document, the Mexican Association for Bone and Mineral Metabolism defines its position on calcium, vitamin D supplement use, and physical activity as an effective, safe, and cost-effective initiatives to prevent low bone mass. INTRODUCTION In Mexico, osteoporosis is a public health problem that is expected to increase in the decades ahead. Generally, modifiable risk factors for bone health are related with lifestyles, especially nutrition and physical activity. METHODS In this position paper, the Mexican Association for Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM, by its acronym in Spanish), which is a multidisciplinary group of researchers, dietitians, epidemiologists, nurses, and physicians who study bone and related tissues and communicate the best strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of bone problems, aims to analyze the association between nutrition and bone health, risk behaviors for low bone mass, and the economic impact that prevention of low bone mass represents for the health care system. RESULTS Addressing therapeutic management with pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, we emphasize the important role the patient plays in the doctor-patient relationship, both in the consulting room and in daily life. Furthermore, the AMMOM defines its position on calcium and vitamin D supplement use as an effective, safe, and cost-effective initiative to prevent low bone mass. CONCLUSIONS In summary, most research and clinical practice related to osteoporosis have focused on diagnosis and treatment, but general measures for primary prevention based on addressing modifiable risk factors as a public health priority to delay the onset of loss of bone mass have not been considered by Mexican authorities. Consequently, the AMMOM task force also seeks to provide information on concrete actions to prevent low bone mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolando Espinosa
- Departamento de Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Patricia Clark
- Unidad de Investigación en Epidemiología Clínica, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México, Mexico.,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez
- Centro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad No. 655, Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, C.P. 62100, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
| | | | - Mario Flores
- Centro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad No. 655, Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, C.P. 62100, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Pilar Diez
- Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Ciudad de México, Mexico.,Sanatorio San José Satélite, Naucalpan, Mexico
| | - Salomón Jasqui
- Servicio de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Hospital Angeles de las Lomas, Ciudad de México, Mexico.,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Anáhuac, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | | | | | - Pilar Lavielle
- Unidad de Investigación en Epidemiologia Clínica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Víctor Mercado
- Clínica Integral de Menopausia, Centro Medico Dalinde, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trenaman L, Selva A, Desroches S, Singh K, Bissonnette J, Bansback N, Stacey D. A measurement framework for adherence in patient decision aid trials applied in a systematic review subanalysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 77:15-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
9
|
Hiligsmann M, Ronda G, van der Weijden T, Boonen A. The development of a personalized patient education tool for decision making for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27:2489-96. [PMID: 27048388 PMCID: PMC4947108 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3555-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2015] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A personalized patient education tool for decision making (PET) for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was developed by means of a systematic development approach. A prototype was constructed and refined by involving various professionals and patients. Professionals and patients expressed a positive attitude towards the use of the PET. INTRODUCTION The purpose was to systematically develop a paper-based personalized PET to assist postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in selecting a treatment in line with their personal values and preferences. METHODS The development of the PET was based on a systematic process including scope, design, development of a prototype, and alpha testing among professionals and patients by semi-structured interviews. RESULTS The design and development resulted in a four-page PET prototype together with a one-page fact sheet of the different drug options. The prototype PET provided the personal risk factors, the estimated individualized risk for a future major osteoporotic fracture and potential reduction with drugs, and a summary of advantages and disadvantages whether or not to start drugs. The drug fact sheet presents five attributes of seven drugs in a tabular format. The alpha testing with professionals resulted in some adaptations, e.g., inclusion of the possibility to calculate fracture risk based on various individual risk scoring methods. Important results from the alpha testing with patients were differences in the fracture risk percentage which was seen as worthwhile to start drugs, the importance of an overview of side effects, and of the timing of the PET into the patient pathway. All women indicated that the PET could be helpful for their decision to select a treatment. CONCLUSION Physicians and patients expressed a positive attitude towards the use of the proposed PET. Further research would be needed to test the effects of the PET on feasibility in clinical workflow and on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - G Ronda
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - T van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Trenaman L, Munro S, Almeida F, Ayas N, Hicklin J, Bansback N. Development of a patient decision aid prototype for adults with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 2015; 20:653-61. [DOI: 10.1007/s11325-015-1269-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Revised: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
11
|
Costa E, Giardini A, Savin M, Menditto E, Lehane E, Laosa O, Pecorelli S, Monaco A, Marengoni A. Interventional tools to improve medication adherence: review of literature. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9:1303-14. [PMID: 26396502 PMCID: PMC4576894 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s87551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Medication adherence and persistence is recognized as a worldwide public health problem, particularly important in the management of chronic diseases. Nonadherence to medical plans affects every level of the population, but particularly older adults due to the high number of coexisting diseases they are affected by and the consequent polypharmacy. Chronic disease management requires a continuous psychological adaptation and behavioral reorganization. In literature, many interventions to improve medication adherence have been described for different clinical conditions, however, most interventions seem to fail in their aims. Moreover, most interventions associated with adherence improvements are not associated with improvements in other outcomes. Indeed, in the last decades, the degree of nonadherence remained unchanged. In this work, we review the most frequent interventions employed to increase the degree of medication adherence, the measured outcomes, and the improvements achieved, as well as the main limitations of the available studies on adherence, with a particular focus on older persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elísio Costa
- UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Anna Giardini
- Psychology Unit, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Montescano (PV), Pavia, Italy
| | - Magda Savin
- European Association of Pharmaceutical Full-line Wholesalers, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Enrica Menditto
- CIRFF/Center of Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, University of Naples FedericoII, Nápoles, Italy
| | - Elaine Lehane
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Olga Laosa
- Centro de Investigación Clínica del Anciano Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Pecorelli
- Italian Medicines Agency – AIFA, Rome, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Marengoni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Science, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Trenaman L, Sadatsafavi M, Almeida F, Ayas N, Lynd L, Marra C, Stacey D, Bansback N. Exploring the Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Patient Decision Aids for Use in Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Med Decis Making 2014; 35:671-82. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x14556676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. There is increasing evidence highlighting the effectiveness of patient decision aids (PtDAs), but evidence supporting their cost-effectiveness is lacking. We consider patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), in whom a PtDA may decrease nonadherence to treatment by empowering patients to receive the option that is most congruent with their own values. Objective. To determine the potential costs and benefits of delivering a PtDA to patients with moderate OSA. Methods. A Markov cohort decision-analytic model was developed for patients with moderate OSA, comparing a PtDA to usual care over 5 years from a societal perspective. Data for patient preference for treatment options was taken from a recent randomized crossover trial, event data (cardiovascular, motor vehicle accidents) came from national databases and published literature. Potential improvements in adherence are unknown, so we considered a realistic range of values. Outcome measures were 5-year costs (in 2010 Canadian dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results. When adherence to treatment was unchanged, the PtDA strategy was dominated by incurring lower QALYs and higher costs. When nonadherence was decreased by 20% in the PtDA arm (corresponding to an increase in adherence from 63% to 70% for continuous positive airway pressure and from 77% to 82% for mandibular advancement splints in year 1), the ICER fell to $62,414/QALY. Costs associated with the treatment devices and delivering the PtDA had the greatest effect on cost-effectiveness. Limitations. The model relies on surrogate measures and opinions for key parameters. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of PtDAs will depend on contextual factors, but a framework is described for properly considering their long-term cost-effectiveness. A number of important questions around the appropriateness of benefit measurement for PtDA trials are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan Trenaman
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| | - Fernanda Almeida
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| | - Najib Ayas
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| | - Larry Lynd
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| | - Carlo Marra
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| | - Nick Bansback
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT,NB)
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (LT, MS, NA, NB)
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (LT, NA, LL, CM, NB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada (LT, DS)
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (MS, LL, CM)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
The cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids: A systematic review. HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION 2014; 2:251-7. [PMID: 26250632 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Affordable Care Act includes provisions to encourage patient-centered care through the use of shared decision making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PtDA). PtDAs are tools that can help encourage SDM by providing information about competing treatment options and elucidating patients׳ values and preferences. Implementing PtDAs into routine practice may incur additional costs through training or increases in physician time. Prominent commentaries have proposed that these costs might be offset if patients choose less expensive options than their providers. However, the cost-effectiveness of PtDAs to date is unclear. The aim of this study was to review the economic evidence from PtDA trials. Our search identified 5347 articles, with 29 included following full-text review. Only one economic evaluation of a PtDA has been completed, which found a PtDA to be cost-saving in women with menorrhagia. Other studies included in the review indicated that PtDAs will likely increase up-front costs, but in some contexts may reduce short-term costs by reducing the uptake of invasive treatments, such as elective surgery. Few studies comprehensively captured long-term costs or measured benefits in a manner conducive to economic evaluation (QALYs or general health utilities). Our review suggests that policy makers currently have insufficient economic evidence to appropriately consider their investments in PtDAs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Polinski JM, Kesselheim AS, Frolkis JP, Wescott P, Allen-Coleman C, Fischer MA. A matter of trust: patient barriers to primary medication adherence. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH 2014; 29:755-763. [PMID: 24838119 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyu023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Primary medication adherence occurs when a patient properly fills the first prescription for a new medication. Primary adherence only occurs about three-quarters of the time for antihypertensive medications. We assessed patients' barriers to primary adherence and attributes of patient-provider discussions that might improve primary adherence for antihypertensives. In total, 26 patients with incomplete primary adherence for an antihypertensive, identified using their retail pharmacy claims, participated in four focus groups. Following a moderators' guide developed a priori, moderators led patients in a discussion of patients' attitudes and experiences with hypertension and receiving an antihypertensive medication, barriers to primary adherence, and their preferences for shared decision making and communication with providers. Three authors analysed and organized data into salient themes, including patients' anger about and suspicion of their hypertension diagnosis, the need for medication and providers' credibility. A trusting patient-provider relationship, shared decision-making support, full disclosure of side effects and cost sensitivity were attributes that might enhance primary adherence. Developing decision support interventions that strengthen the patient-provider relationship by enhancing provider credibility and patient trust prior to prescribing may provide more effective approaches for improving primary adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Polinski
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| | - A S Kesselheim
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| | - J P Frolkis
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| | - P Wescott
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| | - C Allen-Coleman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| | - M A Fischer
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA and Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sheridan SL, Draeger LB, Pignone MP, Rimer B, Bangdiwala SI, Cai J, Gizlice Z, Keyserling TC, Simpson RJ. The effect of a decision aid intervention on decision making about coronary heart disease risk reduction: secondary analyses of a randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014; 14:14. [PMID: 24575882 PMCID: PMC3943405 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/10/2014] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Decision aids offer promise as a practical solution to improve patient decision making about coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention medications and help patients choose medications to which they are likely to adhere. However, little data is available on decision aids designed to promote adherence. Methods In this paper, we report on secondary analyses of a randomized trial of a CHD adherence intervention (second generation decision aid plus tailored messages) versus usual care in an effort to understand how the decision aid facilitates adherence. We focus on data collected from the primary study visit, when intervention participants presented 45 minutes early to a previously scheduled provider visit; viewed the decision aid, indicating their intent for CHD risk reduction after each decision aid component (individualized risk assessment and education, values clarification, and coaching); and filled out a post-decision aid survey assessing their knowledge, perceived risk, decisional conflict, and intent for CHD risk reduction. Control participants did not present early and received usual care from their provider. Following the provider visit, participants in both groups completed post-visit surveys assessing the number and quality of CHD discussions with their provider, their intent for CHD risk reduction, and their feelings about the decision aid. Results We enrolled 160 patients into our study (81 intervention, 79 control). Within the decision aid group, the decision aid significantly increased knowledge of effective CHD prevention strategies (+21 percentage points; adjusted p<.0001) and the accuracy of perceived CHD risk (+33 percentage points; adjusted p<.0001), and significantly decreased decisional conflict (-0.63; adjusted p<.0001). Comparing between study groups, the decision aid also significantly increased CHD prevention discussions with providers (+31 percentage points; adjusted p<.0001) and improved perceptions of some features of patient-provider interactions. Further, it increased participants’ intentions for any effective CHD risk reducing strategies (+21 percentage points; 95% CI 5 to 37 percentage points), with a majority of the effect from the educational component of the decision aid. Ninety-nine percent of participants found the decision aid easy to understand and 93% felt it easy to use. Conclusions Decision aids can play an important role in improving decisions about CHD prevention and increasing patient-provider discussions and intent to reduce CHD risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey L Sheridan
- Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Caron F, Vanthienen J, Baesens B. Clinical Pathway Analytics. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH 2014. [DOI: 10.4018/jitr.2014010102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Recently, medical informatics researchers have focused on supporting standardized activity coordination patterns that structure complex multi-disciplinary interventions. While the designed clinical pathways are aimed to improve the provided healthcare, this paper demonstrates that the care process of individual patients can significantly deviate from the standardized path. Examining the deviations in the individual care processes might result in the further enhancement of the provided quality of care, the evaluation of adverse events or the identification of suboptimal use of resources. This paper presents an optimal combination of process analytics for extracting valuable medical and organizational information from real-world care processes. The authors elaborate an extensive case study based on these process analytics on a series of oncological care processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Caron
- Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Vanthienen
- Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Baesens
- Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Caron F, Vanthienen J, Vanhaecht K, Limbergen EV, De Weerdt J, Baesens B. Monitoring care processes in the gynecologic oncology department. Comput Biol Med 2013; 44:88-96. [PMID: 24377692 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2013] [Revised: 10/10/2013] [Accepted: 10/19/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The care processes of healthcare providers are typically considered as human-centric, flexible, evolving, complex and multi-disciplinary. Consequently, acquiring an insight in the dynamics of these care processes can be an arduous task. A novel event log based approach for extracting valuable medical and organizational information on past executions of the care processes is presented in this study. Care processes are analyzed with the help of a preferential set of process mining techniques in order to discover recurring patterns, analyze and characterize process variants and identify adverse medical events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Caron
- Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jan Vanthienen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Western Norway Research Network on Integrated Care, Helse Fonna, Haugesund, Norway; Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO), Churchillaan 11, 3527 GV, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49/7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jochen De Weerdt
- Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Information Systems School, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Bart Baesens
- Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Vlamingenstraat 38, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; School of Management, University of Southampton, Highfield Southampton, SO17 1 BJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Caron F, Vanthienen J, Baesens B. Healthcare Analytics: Examining the Diagnosis–treatment Cycle. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Salisbury AC, Wang K, Cohen DJ, Li Y, Jones PG, Spertus JA. Selecting Antiplatelet Therapy at the Time of Percutaneous Intervention for an Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6:27-34. [DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.112.965624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C. Salisbury
- From Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City
| | - Kaijun Wang
- From Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City
| | - David J. Cohen
- From Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City
| | - Yan Li
- From Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City
| | - Philip G. Jones
- From Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City
| | - John A. Spertus
- From Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Glass KE, Wills CE, Holloman C, Olson J, Hechmer C, Miller CK, Duchemin AM. Shared decision making and other variables as correlates of satisfaction with health care decisions in a United States national survey. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2012; 88:100-5. [PMID: 22410642 PMCID: PMC3492880 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2011] [Revised: 02/03/2012] [Accepted: 02/04/2012] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between shared decision-making (SDM) and satisfaction with decision (SWD) within a larger survey of patient decision-making in health care consultations. METHODS A randomly selected age-proportionate national sample of adults (aged 21-70 years) stratified on race, ethnicity, and gender (N=488) was recruited from a health research volunteer registry and completed an online survey with reference to a recent health consultation. Measures included the shared decision making-9 questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), Satisfaction With Decision (SWD) scale, sociodemographic, health, and other standardized decision-making measures. Forward selection weighted multiple regression analysis was used to model correlates of SWD. RESULTS After controlling for sociodemographic variables, SDM-Q-9 total score was associated with SWD, adjusted R(2)=.368, p<.001. Three of nine SDM-Q-9 items accounted for significant proportions of variance in SWD. CONCLUSION SDM was positively associated with SWD and was strongest for three areas of SDM: patients being helped in a health care consultation with understanding information, with treatment preference elicitation, and with weighing options thoroughly. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS By identifying variables such as SDM that are associated with SWD, health care interventions can better target modifiable factors to enhance satisfaction and other outcomes.
Collapse
|
21
|
McHorney CA, Zhang NJ, Stump T, Zhao X. Structural equation modeling of the proximal-distal continuum of adherence drivers. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012; 6. [PMID: 23204839 PMCID: PMC3508554 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s36535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nonadherence to prescription medications has been shown to be significantly influenced by three key medication-specific beliefs: patients' perceived need for the prescribed medication, their concerns about the prescribed medication, and perceived medication affordability. Structural equation modeling was used to test the predictors of these three proximal determinants of medication adherence using the proximal-distal continuum of adherence drivers as the organizing conceptual framework. METHODS In Spring 2008, survey participants were selected from the Harris Interactive Chronic Illness Panel, an internet-based panel of hundreds of thousands of adults with chronic disease. Respondents were eligible for the survey if they were aged 40 years and older, resided in the US, and reported having at least one of six chronic diseases: asthma, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, osteoporosis, or other cardiovascular disease. A final sample size of 1072 was achieved. The proximal medication beliefs were measured by three multi-item scales: perceived need for medications, perceived medication concerns, and perceived medication affordability. The intermediate sociomedical beliefs and skills included four multi-item scales: perceived disease severity, knowledge about the prescribed medication, perceived immunity to side effects, and perceived value of nutraceuticals. Generic health beliefs and skills consisted of patient engagement in their care, health information-seeking tendencies, internal health locus of control, a single-item measure of self-rated health, and general mental health. Structural equation modeling was used to model proximal-distal continuum of adherence drivers. RESULTS The average age was 58 years (range = 40-90 years), and 65% were female and 89% were white. Forty-one percent had at least a four-year college education, and just under half (45%) had an annual income of $50,000 or more. Hypertension and hyperlipidemia were each reported by about a quarter of respondents (24% and 23%, respectively). A smaller percentage of respondents had osteoporosis (17%), diabetes (15%), asthma (13%), or other cardiovascular disease (8%). Three independent variables were significantly associated with the three proximal adherence drivers: perceived disease severity, knowledge about the medication, and perceived value of nutraceuticals. Both perceived immunity to side effects and patient engagement was significantly associated with perceived need for medications and perceived medication concerns. CONCLUSION Testing the proximal-distal continuum of adherence drivers shed light on specific areas where adherence dialogue and enhancement should focus. Our results can help to inform the design of future adherence interventions as well as the content of patient education materials and adherence reminder letters. For long-term medication adherence, patients need to autonomously and intrinsically commit to therapy and that, in turn, is more likely to occur if they are both informed (disease and medication knowledge and rationale, disease severity, consequences of nonadherence, and side effects) and motivated (engaged in their care, perceive a need for medication, and believe the benefits outweigh the risks).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen A McHorney
- US Outcomes Research, Merck, North Wales, PA
- Correspondence: Colleen A McHorney, US Outcomes Research, Merck 351 N Sumneytown Pike, UG2MW-05, North Wales PA 19454, USA, Tel +1 267 305 2425, Fax +1 267 305 0860, Email
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|