1
|
Gupta R, Xie BE, Zhu M, Segal JB. Randomized Experiments to Reduce Overuse of Health Care: A Scoping Review. Med Care 2024; 62:263-269. [PMID: 38315879 PMCID: PMC10939761 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health care overuse is pervasive in countries with advanced health care delivery systems. We hypothesize that effective interventions to reduce low-value care that targets patients or clinicians are mediated by psychological and cognitive processes that change behaviors and that interventions targeting these processes are varied. Thus, we performed a scoping review of experimental studies of interventions, including the interventions' objectives and characteristics, to reduce low-value care that targeted psychological and cognitive processes. METHODS We systematically searched databases for experimental studies of interventions to change cognitive orientations and affective states in the setting of health care overuse. Outcomes included observed overuse or a stated intention to use services. We used existing frameworks for behavior change and mechanisms of change to categorize the interventions and the mediating processes. RESULTS Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studied the provision of information to patients or clinicians, with most providing cost information. Six studies used educational interventions, including the provision of feedback about individual practice. Studies rarely used counseling, behavioral nudges, persuasion, and rewards. Mechanisms for behavior change included gain in knowledge or confidence and motivation by social norms. CONCLUSIONS In this scoping review, we found few experiments testing interventions that directly target the psychological and cognitive processes of patients or clinicians to reduce low-value care. Most studies provided information to patients or clinicians without measuring or considering mediating factors toward behavior change. These findings highlight the need for process-driven experimental designs, including trials of behavioral nudges and persuasive language involving a trusting patient-clinician relationship, to identify effective interventions to reduce low-value care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Gupta
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Meng Zhu
- Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, MD
- Pamplin College of Business, Virgina Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Jodi B. Segal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baird TA, Wright DR, Britto MT, Lipstein EA, Trout AT, Hayatghaibi SE. Patient Preferences in Diagnostic Imaging: A Scoping Review. THE PATIENT 2023; 16:579-591. [PMID: 37667148 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00646-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As new diagnostic imaging technologies are adopted, decisions surrounding diagnostic imaging become increasingly complex. As such, understanding patient preferences in imaging decision making is imperative. OBJECTIVES We aimed to review quantitative patient preference studies in imaging-related decision making, including characteristics of the literature and the quality of the evidence. METHODS The Pubmed, Embase, EconLit, and CINAHL databases were searched to identify studies involving diagnostic imaging and quantitative patient preference measures from January 2000 to June 2022. Study characteristics that were extracted included the preference elicitation method, disease focus, and sample size. We employed the PREFS (Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, Significance) checklist as our quality assessment tool. RESULTS A total of 54 articles were included. The following methods were used to elicit preferences: conjoint analysis/discrete choice experiment methods (n = 27), contingent valuation (n = 16), time trade-off (n = 4), best-worst scaling (n = 3), multicriteria decision analysis (n = 3), and a standard gamble approach (n = 1). Half of the studies were published after 2016 (52%, 28/54). The most common scenario (n = 39) for eliciting patient preferences was cancer screening. Computed tomography, the most frequently studied imaging modality, was included in 20 studies, and sample sizes ranged from 30 to 3469 participants (mean 552). The mean PREFS score was 3.5 (standard deviation 0.8) for the included studies. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights that a variety of quantitative preference methods are being used, as diagnostic imaging technologies continue to evolve. While the number of preference studies in diagnostic imaging has increased with time, most examine preventative care/screening, leaving a gap in knowledge regarding imaging for disease characterization and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trey A Baird
- University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Davene R Wright
- Division of Child Health Research and Policy, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria T Britto
- University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
| | - Ellen A Lipstein
- University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
| | - Andrew T Trout
- University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Shireen E Hayatghaibi
- University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brotzman LE, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison. Med Care Res Rev 2023; 80:372-385. [PMID: 36800914 DOI: 10.1177/10775587231153269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
While cancer screening guidelines increasingly recommend incorporating life expectancy estimates to inform screening decisions for older adults, little is known about how this happens in practice. This review summarizes current knowledge about primary care clinician and older adult (65+) perspectives about use of life expectancy to guide cancer screening decisions. Clinicians report operational barriers, uncertainty, and hesitation around use of life expectancy in screening decisions. They recognize it may help them more accurately weigh benefits and harms but are unsure how to estimate life expectancy for individual patients. Older adults face conceptual barriers and are generally unconvinced of the benefits of considering their life expectancy when making screening decisions. Life expectancy will always be a difficult topic for clinicians and patients, but there are advantages to incorporating it in cancer screening decisions. We highlight key takeaways from both clinician and older adult perspectives to guide future research.
Collapse
|
4
|
Haynes A, Howard K, Johnson L, Williams G, Clanchy K, Tweedy S, Scheinberg A, Chagpar S, Wang B, Vassallo G, Ashpole R, Sherrington C, Hassett L. Physical Activity Preferences of People Living with Brain Injury: Formative Qualitative Research to Develop a Discrete Choice Experiment. THE PATIENT 2023:10.1007/s40271-023-00628-9. [PMID: 37204699 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00628-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The World Health Organization physical activity guidelines for people living with disability do not consider the needs of people living with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. This paper describes the qualitative co-development of a discrete choice experiment survey to inform the adaption of these guidelines by identifying the physical activity preferences of people living with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury in Australia. METHODS The research team comprised researchers, people with lived experience of traumatic brain injury and health professionals with expertise in traumatic brain injury. We followed a four-stage process: (1) identification of key constructs and initial expression of attributes, (2) critique and refinement of attributes, (3) prioritisation of attributes and refinement of levels and (4) testing and refining language, format and comprehensibility. Data collection included deliberative dialogue, focus groups and think-aloud interviews with 22 purposively sampled people living with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Strategies were used to support inclusive participation. Analysis employed qualitative description and framework methods. RESULTS This formative process resulted in discarding, merging, renaming and reconceptualising attributes and levels. Attributes were reduced from an initial list of 17 to six: (1) Type of activity, (2) Out-of-pocket cost, (3) Travel time, (4) Who with, (5) Facilitated by and (6) Accessibility of setting. Confusing terminology and cumbersome features of the survey instrument were also revised. Challenges included purposive recruitment, reducing diverse stakeholder views to a few attributes, finding the right language and navigating the complexity of discrete choice experiment scenarios. CONCLUSIONS This formative co-development process significantly improved the relevance and comprehensibility of the discrete choice experiment survey tool. This process may be applicable in other discrete choice experiment studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby Haynes
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health: The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 KGV Building, Missenden Road, Camperdown (Gadigal land), NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Liam Johnson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gavin Williams
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kelly Clanchy
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Sean Tweedy
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Adam Scheinberg
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sakina Chagpar
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health: The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Belinda Wang
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health: The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rhys Ashpole
- Insurance and Care (icare) NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Sherrington
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health: The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leanne Hassett
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health: The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Land, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Implementation Science Academy, Sydney Health Partners, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calderwood AH, Tosteson TD, Wang Q, Onega T, Walter LC. Association of Life Expectancy With Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings and Follow-up Recommendations in Older Adults. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:426-434. [PMID: 36912828 PMCID: PMC10012041 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Importance Surveillance after prior colon polyps is the most frequent indication for colonoscopy in older adults. However, to our knowledge, the current use of surveillance colonoscopy, clinical outcomes, and follow-up recommendations in association with life expectancy, factoring in both age and comorbidities, have not been studied. Objective To evaluate the association of estimated life expectancy with surveillance colonoscopy findings and follow-up recommendations among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants This registry-based cohort study used data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry (NHCR) linked with Medicare claims data and included adults in the NHCR who were older than 65 years, underwent colonoscopy for surveillance after prior polyps between April 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018, and had full Medicare Parts A and B coverage and no Medicare managed care plan enrollment in the year prior to colonoscopy. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to March 2021. Exposures Life expectancy (<5 years, 5 to <10 years, or ≥10 years), estimated using a validated prediction model. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were clinical findings of colon polyps or colorectal cancer (CRC) and recommendations for future colonoscopy. Results Among 9831 adults included in the study, the mean (SD) age was 73.2 (5.0) years and 5285 (53.8%) were male. A total of 5649 patients (57.5%) had an estimated life expectancy of 10 or more years, 3443 (35.0%) of 5 to less than 10 years, and 739 (7.5%) of less than 5 years. Overall, 791 patients (8.0%) had advanced polyps (768 [7.8%]) or CRC (23 [0.2%]). Among the 5281 patients with available recommendations (53.7%), 4588 (86.9%) were recommended to return for future colonoscopy. Those with longer life expectancy or more advanced clinical findings were more likely to be told to return. For example, among patients with no polyps or only small hyperplastic polyps, 132 of 227 (58.1%) with life expectancy of less than 5 years were told to return for future surveillance colonoscopy vs 940 of 1257 (74.8%) with life expectancy of 5 to less than 10 years and 2163 of 2272 (95.2%) with life expectancy of 10 years or more (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, the likelihood of finding advanced polyps and CRC on surveillance colonoscopy was low regardless of life expectancy. Despite this observation, 58.1% of older adults with less than 5 years' life expectancy were recommended to return for future surveillance colonoscopy. These data may help refine decision-making about pursuing or stopping surveillance colonoscopy in older adults with a history of polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey H. Calderwood
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Cancer, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- The Dartmouth Institute at Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Tor D. Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute at Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Qianfei Wang
- The Dartmouth Institute at Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Tracy Onega
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Louise C. Walter
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco
- VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Habbous S, Alibhai SMH, Menjak IB, Forster K, Holloway CMB, Darling G. The effect of age on the opportunity to receive cancer treatment. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 81:102271. [PMID: 36209661 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults with cancer may not receive the same opportunities for treatment as younger patients. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we explored whether age was an independent predictor of receiving specialist consultation and treatment. METHODS Patients age 45-99 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry having a primary solid tumor diagnosed between 01/Jan/2010 and 31/Dec/2019. We used logistic regression adjusted sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to compare the likelihood of consultation or receipt of treatment using linear splines at critical ages of 65, 80, and 90 years. RESULTS A total 168,232 (42%), 165,205 (41%), 57,360 (14%), and 7810 (2%) patients were diagnosed age 45-64, 65-79, 80-89, and 90-99, respectively. The likelihood of surgical consultation decreased as patients reached 65 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 (0.84-0.89)], which decreased further among octogenarians [aOR 0.63 (0.59-0.67)]. Similar results were observed for consultation with a medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Receipt of surgery also decreased with age. Three-month post-operative mortality was higher among older patients [aRR 1.38 (1.26-1.50) per 10 years, p < 0.0001], an effect that remained similar as patients reached age 65 + years of age (p = 0.09 for change). For stage I patients, 3-month post-operative survival was high across all age groups, ranging from 99.8% in 45-64 year-olds, 99.4% in 65-79 year-olds, and 98.1% among octogenarians and nonagenarians (lung, colorectal, breast, cervical cancer patients). CONCLUSION Older patients were less likely to have specialist consultations. More comprehensive data collection on clinical factors and referral patterns is needed to improve care for elderly cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Habbous
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ines B Menjak
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katharina Forster
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire M B Holloway
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail Darling
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Núñez ER, Caverly TJ, Zhang S, Glickman ME, Qian SX, Boudreau JH, Miller DR, Slatore CG, Wiener RS. Factors Associated With Declining Lung Cancer Screening After Discussion With a Physician in a Cohort of US Veterans. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2227126. [PMID: 35972738 PMCID: PMC9382440 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Lung cancer screening (LCS) is underused in the US, particularly in underserved populations, and little is known about factors associated with declining LCS. Guidelines call for shared decision-making when LCS is offered to ensure informed, patient-centered decisions. OBJECTIVE To assess how frequently veterans decline LCS and examine factors associated with declining LCS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included LCS-eligible US veterans who were offered LCS between January 1, 2013, and February 1, 2021, by a physician at 1 of 30 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities that routinely used electronic health record clinical reminders documenting LCS eligibility and veterans' decisions to accept or decline LCS. Data were obtained from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse or Medicare claims files from the VA Information Resource Center. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was documentation, in clinical reminders, that veterans declined LCS after a discussion with a physician. Logistic regression analyses with physicians and facilities as random effects were used to assess factors associated with declining LCS compared with agreeing to LCS. RESULTS Of 43 257 LCS-eligible veterans who were offered LCS (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [5.8] years), 95.9% were male, 84.2% were White, and 37.1% lived in a rural zip code; 32.0% declined screening. Veterans were less likely to decline LCS if they were younger (age 55-59 years: odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.74; age 60-64 years: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.85), were Black (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87), were Hispanic (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.78), did not have to make co-payments (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99), or had more frequent VHA health care utilization (outpatient: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67-0.72; emergency department: OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92). Veterans were more likely to decline LCS if they were older (age 70-74 years: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.37; age 75-80 years: OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.73-2.17), lived farther from a VHA screening facility (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08), had spent more days in long-term care (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19), had a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05), or had specific cardiovascular or mental health conditions (congestive heart failure: OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39; stroke: OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; schizophrenia: OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.60-2.19). The physician and facility offering LCS accounted for 19% and 36% of the variation in declining LCS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, older veterans with serious comorbidities were more likely to decline LCS and Black and Hispanic veterans were more likely to accept it. Variation in LCS decisions was accounted for more by the facility and physician offering LCS than by patient factors. These findings suggest that shared decision-making conversations in which patients play a central role in guiding care may enhance patient-centered care and address disparities in LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo R. Núñez
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
| | - Tanner J. Caverly
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- National Center for Lung Cancer Screening, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Sanqian Zhang
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Mark E. Glickman
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- National Center for Lung Cancer Screening, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Shirley X. Qian
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jacqueline H. Boudreau
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
| | - Donald R. Miller
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher G. Slatore
- National Center for Lung Cancer Screening, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Renda Soylemez Wiener
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
- National Center for Lung Cancer Screening, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schousboe JT, Sprague BL, Abraham L, O'Meara ES, Onega T, Advani S, Henderson LM, Wernli KJ, Zhang D, Miglioretti DL, Braithwaite D, Kerlikowske K. Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:11-19. [PMID: 34807717 PMCID: PMC9621600 DOI: 10.7326/m20-8076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 75 years remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To estimate benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of extending mammography to age 80, 85, or 90 years according to comorbidity burden. DESIGN Markov microsimulation model. DATA SOURCES SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program and Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. TARGET POPULATION U.S. women aged 65 to 90 years in groups defined by Charlson comorbidity score (CCS). TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE National health payer. INTERVENTION Screening mammography to age 75, 80, 85, or 90 years. OUTCOME MEASURES Breast cancer death, survival, and costs. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Extending biennial mammography from age 75 to 80 years averted 1.7, 1.4, and 1.0 breast cancer deaths and increased days of life gained by 5.8, 4.2, and 2.7 days per 1000 women for comorbidity scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Annual mammography beyond age 75 years was not cost-effective, but extending biennial mammography to age 80 years was ($54 000, $65 000, and $85 000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained for women with CCSs of 0, 1, and ≥2, respectively). Overdiagnosis cases were double the number of deaths averted from breast cancer. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Costs per QALY gained were sensitive to changes in invasive cancer incidence and shift of breast cancer stage with screening mammography. LIMITATION No randomized controlled trials of screening mammography beyond age 75 years are available to provide model parameter inputs. CONCLUSION Although annual mammography is not cost-effective, biennial screening mammography to age 80 years is; however, the absolute number of deaths averted is small, especially for women with comorbidities. Women considering screening beyond age 75 years should weigh the potential harms of overdiagnosis versus the potential benefit of averting death from breast cancer. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T Schousboe
- Park Nicollet Clinic and HealthPartners Institute, HealthPartners, Bloomington, and Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.T.S.)
| | - Brian L Sprague
- Departments of Surgery and Radiology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont (B.L.S.)
| | - Linn Abraham
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (L.A., E.S.O., K.J.W.)
| | - Ellen S O'Meara
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (L.A., E.S.O., K.J.W.)
| | - Tracy Onega
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Huntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (T.O.)
| | - Shailesh Advani
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, and Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, California (S.A.)
| | - Louise M Henderson
- Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (L.M.H.)
| | - Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (L.A., E.S.O., K.J.W.)
| | - Dongyu Zhang
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program and Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (D.Z.)
| | - Diana L Miglioretti
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, and Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (D.L.M.)
| | - Dejana Braithwaite
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Department of Epidemiology, and Institute on Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (D.B.)
| | - Karla Kerlikowske
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (K.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith J, Dodd RH, Gainey KM, Naganathan V, Cvejic E, Jansen J, McCaffery KJ. Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults' Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2133406. [PMID: 34748004 PMCID: PMC8576581 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Decisions for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and their clinicians about whether to continue to screen for cancer are not easy. Many older adults who are frail or have limited life expectancy or comorbidities continue to be screened for cancer despite guidelines suggesting they should not; furthermore, many older adults have limited knowledge of the potential harms of continuing to be screened. OBJECTIVE To summarize the patient-reported factors associated with older adults' decisions regarding screening for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW Studies were identified by searching databases from January 2000 to June 2020 and were independently assessed for inclusion by 2 authors. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and then all decisions were cross-checked and discussed where necessary. Data analysis was performed from September to December 2020. FINDINGS The search yielded 2475 records, of which 21 unique studies were included. Nine studies were quantitative, 8 were qualitative, and 4 used mixed method designs. Of the 21 studies, 17 were conducted in the US, and 10 of 21 assessed breast cancer screening decisions only. Factors associated with decision-making were synthesized into 5 categories: demographic, health and clinical, psychological, physician, and social and system. Commonly identified factors associated with the decision to undergo screening included personal or family history of cancer, positive screening attitudes, routine or habit, to gain knowledge, friends, and a physician's recommendation. Factors associated with the decision to forgo screening included being older, negative screening attitudes, and desire not to know about cancer. Some factors had varying associations, including insurance coverage, living in a nursing home, prior screening experience, health problems, limited life expectancy, perceived cancer risk, risks of screening, family, and a physician's recommendation to stop. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although guidelines suggest incorporating life expectancy and health status to inform older adults' cancer screening decisions, older adults' ingrained beliefs about screening may run counter to these concepts. Communication strategies are needed that support older adults to make informed cancer screening decisions by addressing underlying screening beliefs in context with their perceived and actual risk of developing cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael H. Dodd
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen M. Gainey
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scailteux LM, Capelle V, Balusson F, Oger E, Vincendeau S, Mathieu R, Chapron A. Changes in prostate cancer screening practice by blood PSA testing between 2011 and 2017, a French population-based study. Curr Med Res Opin 2021; 37:1435-1441. [PMID: 34134580 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1944075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine the trend of first blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test prescription in France between 2011 and 2017, based on the assumption that prostate cancer (PCa) screening is expected to decline over the years. METHOD Using a representative sample of the French population from the French Health Insurance database, we identified 50-52-year-old men without PCa and without any blood PSA test in the five years before 2011, 2014 and 2017 (January 1-December 31 of each year). For each of these three years, the primary outcome was the first reimbursement of a blood PSA test. We used a logistic regression model with first blood PSA test as the outcome and year as the main explanatory variable. As secondary objectives, we also identified the prescriber's specialty, the urological consultation frequency, and the number of prostate biopsies in the year after the first blood PSA test reimbursement (only for 2011 and 2014). RESULTS In 2011, 2014 and 2017, 5 275, 5 792 and 5 887 50-52-year-old men, respectively, were included. The percentage of patients with a first blood PSA test prescription decreased linearly from 2011 to 2017: 15.7% in 2011, 13.2% in 2014, and 12.4% in 2017 (p < .001). Blood PSA testing was mainly prescribed by general practitioners (>95%). The median interval between PSA tests was 13 months in 2011 and 14 months in 2014. Fewer than 10% of men had ≥1 consultation with an urologist during the year after the first blood PSA test. After the first blood PSA test, eight prostate biopsies were performed in 2011 and two in 2014. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that in France, PCa screening is a primary care issue. Although PCa screening remains controversial and confusion exists about the best practice, our study showed a linear decrease of blood PSA test prescriptions for 50-52-year-old men between 2011 and 2017, although the reason for screening was unknown. As clinical information was not available, additional evidence is needed to determine the real impact of this decrease on the cancer-specific and overall mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie-Marie Scailteux
- Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Information Center, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, REPERES [Pharmacoepidemiology and Heath Services Research], Rennes, France
| | | | - Frédéric Balusson
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, REPERES [Pharmacoepidemiology and Heath Services Research], Rennes, France
| | - Emmanuel Oger
- Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Information Center, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, REPERES [Pharmacoepidemiology and Heath Services Research], Rennes, France
| | | | - Romain Mathieu
- Urology Department, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Anthony Chapron
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 (Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes), Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schoenborn NL, Xue QL, Pollack CE, Janssen EM, Bridges JF, Wolff AC, Boyd CM. Demographic, health, and attitudinal factors predictive of cancer screening decisions in older adults. Prev Med Rep 2019; 13:244-248. [PMID: 30719405 PMCID: PMC6350222 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Many older adults receive routine cancer screening even when it is no longer recommended. We sought to identify demographic, health-related, and attitudinal factors that are most predictive of continued breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening decisions in older adults under various scenarios. A sample of adults age 65+ (n = 1272) were recruited from a nationally representative panel in November 2016, of which 881 (69.3%) completed our survey. Participants were presented vignettes in which we experimentally varied a hypothetical patient's life expectancy, age, quality of life, and physician screening recommendation. The dependent variable was the choice to continue cancer screening in the vignette. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify characteristics most predictive of screening decisions; both the participants' characteristics and the hypothetical patient's characteristics in the vignettes were included in the analysis. CART analysis uses recursive partitioning to create a classification tree in which variables predictive of the outcome are included as hierarchical tree nodes. We used automated ten-fold cross-validation to select the tree with lowest misclassification and highest predictive accuracy. Participants' attitude towards cancer screening was most predictive of choosing screening. Among those who agreed with the statement "I plan to get screened for cancer for as long as I live" (n = 300, 31.9%), 73.2% chose screening and 57.2% would still choose screening if hypothetical patient had 1-year life expectancy. For this subset of older adults with enthusiasm towards screening even when presented with scenario involving limited life expectancy, efforts are needed to improve informed decision-making about screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy L. Schoenborn
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Qian-Li Xue
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Craig E. Pollack
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | | | - John F.P. Bridges
- Ohio State University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Antonio C. Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Cynthia M. Boyd
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|