1
|
Freeman ALJ, Tanase LM, Schneider CR, Kerr J. Can narrative help people engage with and understand information without being persuasive? An empirical study. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2024; 11:231708. [PMID: 39076355 PMCID: PMC11285403 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Stories have been shown to be engaging and aid the comprehension and retention of information. However, the persuasive power of storytelling is well-recognized. Is this an inherent property? Can a narrative be constructed that helps people engage with information but does not persuade them? We presented participants (n = 1309) with information about a fictional new drug and asked them whether they would license it on the basis of this. All saw the same information, in either a bullet-pointed list or as a 'process narrative'-a journalist's 'journey of discovery', designed to avoid persuasive language. Participants rated the narrative format a little more engaging than the non-narrative (p = 0.033, d = 0.12) and remembered the information in it slightly better (p = 0.040, d = 0.11). They did not rate the narrative version as more persuasive, but those reading it were on average more opposed to licensing the drug than those reading the non-narrative (p < 0.001, d = 0.18). Based on participants' responses to other questions, we speculate this may be owing to the increased salience of risks of the drug, arising from subtle differences in wording. Thus, while narratives may have useful properties, they must be carefully constructed to avoid unintentional effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra L. J. Freeman
- Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, DPMMS, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, CambridgeCB3 0WA, UK
| | - Lisa-Maria Tanase
- Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, DPMMS, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, CambridgeCB3 0WA, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EB, UK
| | - Claudia R. Schneider
- Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, DPMMS, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, CambridgeCB3 0WA, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EB, UK
- School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch8140, New Zealand
| | - John Kerr
- Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication, DPMMS, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, CambridgeCB3 0WA, UK
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, 29 Brandon Street, Wellington6011, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fransen MP, Damman OC, Bas S, Uiters E, Timmermans DR. Decision-making in breast cancer screening: A qualitative exploration of the match between women's beliefs and screening information in the Netherlands. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 122:108155. [PMID: 38325207 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decision-making about breast cancer screening requires balanced and understandable information that takes prior beliefs of screening invitees into account. METHODS In qualitative interviews with 22 Dutch women who were invited for screening for the first time (49-52 years of age, varying health literacy levels), we gained insight in their beliefs on breast cancer and breast cancer screening, and explored how the current screening information matched these beliefs. RESULTS Breast cancer was perceived as an unpredictable, severe, and uncontrollable disease. Women considered screening as self-evident and an important mean to gain some control over breast cancer. Information on benefits of screening was in line with women's prior beliefs and confirmed women's main reasons to participate. Information about false-positive outcomes, overtreatment, and false negative outcomes did not correspond to women's prior beliefs and this information was generally not considered relevant for decision-making. Preferences for additional information merely concerned practical information on the screening procedure. CONCLUSION Complex information on the harms of screening does not match women's beliefs and is not taken into account in their decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Information regarding breast cancer screening could be further aligned to prior beliefs by taking into account values, filling knowledge gaps and correct misconceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam P Fransen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sharell Bas
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Uiters
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle Rm Timmermans
- Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wahl KJ, Brooks M, Trenaman L, Desjardins-Lorimer K, Bell CM, Chokmorova N, Segall R, Syring J, Williams A, Li LC, Norman WV, Munro S. User-Centered Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Choice of Early Abortion Method: Multi-Cycle Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e48793. [PMID: 38625731 PMCID: PMC11061794 DOI: 10.2196/48793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People seeking abortion in early pregnancy have the choice between medication and procedural options for care. The choice is preference-sensitive-there is no clinically superior option and the choice depends on what matters most to the individual patient. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are shared decision-making tools that support people in making informed, values-aligned health care choices. OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop and evaluate the usability of a web-based PtDA for the Canadian context, where abortion care is publicly funded and available without legal restriction. METHODS We used a systematic, user-centered design approach guided by principles of integrated knowledge translation. We first developed a prototype using available evidence for abortion seekers' decisional needs and the risks, benefits, and consequences of each option. We then refined the prototype through think-aloud interviews with participants at risk of unintended pregnancy ("patient" participants). Interviews were audio-recorded and documented through field notes. Finally, we conducted a web-based survey of patients and health care professionals involved with abortion care, which included the System Usability Scale. We used content analysis to identify usability issues described in the field notes and open-ended survey questions, and descriptive statistics to summarize participant characteristics and close-ended survey responses. RESULTS A total of 61 individuals participated in this study. Further, 11 patients participated in think-aloud interviews. Overall, the response to the PtDA was positive; however, the content analysis identified issues related to the design, language, and information about the process and experience of obtaining abortion care. In response, we adapted the PtDA into an interactive website and revised it to include consistent and plain language, additional information (eg, pain experience narratives), and links to additional resources on how to find an abortion health care professional. In total, 25 patients and 25 health care professionals completed the survey. The mean System Usability Scale score met the threshold for good usability among both patient and health care professional participants. Most participants felt that the PtDA was user-friendly (patients: n=25, 100%; health care professionals: n=22, 88%), was not missing information (patients: n=21, 84%; health care professionals: n=18, 72%), and that it was appropriate for patients to complete the PtDA before a consultation (patients: n=23, 92%; health care professionals: n=23, 92%). Open-ended responses focused on improving usability by reducing the length of the PtDA and making the website more mobile-friendly. CONCLUSIONS We systematically designed the PtDA to address an unmet need to support informed, values-aligned decision-making about the method of abortion. The design process responded to a need identified by potential users and addressed unique sensitivities related to reproductive health decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate J Wahl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Melissa Brooks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Logan Trenaman
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Carolyn M Bell
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nazgul Chokmorova
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Romy Segall
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Janelle Syring
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Aleyah Williams
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Linda C Li
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Munro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Veerhuis N, Merizzi A, Papoulias S, Bradbury C, Sheret K, Traynor V. 'It is empowering and gives people dignity in a very difficult process': A multistage, multimethod qualitative study to understand the views of end users in the cultural adaptation of a dementia and driving decision aid. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14006. [PMID: 38497286 PMCID: PMC10945392 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions about driving for individuals living with dementia (ILWD) can be challenging. There are limited evidence-based person-centred interventions in the United Kingdom that support decisions about transitioning to not driving or guidelines for developing decision aids for ILWD. This study aimed to understand the important features of a decision aid through the cultural adaptation of Australian dementia and driving decision aid (DDDA) for ILWD residing in the United Kingdom. METHODS This qualitative study was theoretically underpinned by a person-centred framework and conducted over three stages: (1) Development of a draft UK-specific DDDA; (2) semistructured interviews with ILWD and an online survey with stakeholders to obtain their views on a draft UK DDDA and (3) content analysis and synthesis of qualitative data to inform the final version of the decision aid. RESULTS Eleven ILWD and six of their spouses participated in interviews, and 102 stakeholders responded to an online survey. The four broad features identified as important to include in a decision aid for drivers living with dementia were: a structured and interactive format; positive and supportive messaging and presentation; relevant and concise content and choice-centred. The perceived benefits of the decision aid were identified as supporting conversations, enhancing collaborative decision making and enabling agency with decisions about driving and future mobility options. CONCLUSIONS Decision aids that are underpinned by interactive choice-driven questions enhance a person-centred approach to decisions about driving. Positively framing decision aids through the presentation and content can facilitate engagement with the decision-making process about driving. The findings have implications for the development of decision aids designed for ILWD on other important health and social topics. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Advocating for the development of a UK DDDA were ILWD. Healthcare professionals contributed to the development of a draft UK DDDA. Former and current drivers living with dementia, family members, healthcare professionals and other support networks of ILWD participated in interviews or an online survey which informed the final version of the UK DDDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Veerhuis
- Aged, Dementia, Health Education and Research Centre, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alessandra Merizzi
- Memory Assessment and Treatment Service, Pennine Care National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oldham, UK
| | - Stephanie Papoulias
- Memory Assessment and Treatment Service, Pennine Care National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oldham, UK
| | - Claire Bradbury
- Memory Assessment Service, Dorset Healthcare University Foundation Trust, Alderney Hospital, Poole, UK
| | - Kathy Sheret
- Memory Assessment Service, Dorset Healthcare University Foundation Trust, Alderney Hospital, Poole, UK
| | - Victoria Traynor
- Aged, Dementia, Health Education and Research Centre, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsiao B, Downs JS, Lanyon M, Blalock SJ, Curtis JR, Harrold LR, Nowell WB, Wiedmeyer C, Venkatachalam S, Patterson MT, Gavigan K, Stradford L, Ali D, Fraenkel L. Understanding Heterogeneity in Patients' Conceptualisation of Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cluster Analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070848. [PMID: 37666546 PMCID: PMC10481841 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uptake of treat-to-target (TTT) strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management is low. Our objective was to understand the heterogeneity in patients' conceptualisation of RA treatment to inform interventions improving TTT uptake. DESIGN Eligible participants recruited from an online research registry rated 56 items (on 5-point scales) reflecting concepts raised from patient interviews. Using items describing adhering to physician recommendations to create a binary criterion variable for medication adherence, we conducted a principal components analysis on the remaining items using Varimax rotation, describing how these factors predict adherence over and above demographic characteristics. We further use optimal sets in regression to identify the individual concepts that are most predictive of medication adherence. RESULTS We found significant heterogeneity in patients' conceptualisation of RA treatment among 621 persons with RA. A scree plot revealed a four-factor solution explained 38.4% of the variance. The four factors expected to facilitate TTT uptake were (% variance explained): (1) Access to high quality care and support (11.3%); (2) low decisional conflict related to changing disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (10.1%); (3) endorsement of a favourable DMARD risk/benefit ratio (9.9%); and (4) confidence that testing reflects disease activity (7.2%). These factors account for 13.8% of the variance in full medication adherence, fully explaining the only significant demographic predictor, age of the patient. The individual items most predictive of poor adherence centre on the lack of effective patient-physician communication, specifically insufficient access to information from rheumatologists, along with the need to seek information elsewhere. CONCLUSION Patients' conceptualisation of RA treatment varies; however, almost all patients have difficulty escalating DMARDs, even with access to quality information and an understanding of the benefits of TTT. Tailored interventions are needed to address patient hesitancy to escalate DMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Hsiao
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Julie S Downs
- Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mandy Lanyon
- Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Susan J Blalock
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Leslie R Harrold
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kelly Gavigan
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, New York, USA
| | - Laura Stradford
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, New York, USA
| | - Danielle Ali
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, New York, USA
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Finderup J, Mooney A. Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:i20-i38. [PMID: 37711634 PMCID: PMC10497379 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney services vary in the way they involve people with kidney failure (PwKF) in treatment decisions as management needs change. We discuss how decision-science applications support proactively PwKF to make informed decisions between treatment options with kidney professionals. Methods A conceptual review of findings about decision making and use of decision aids in kidney services, synthesized with reference to: the Making Informed Decisions-Individually and Together (MIND-IT) multiple stakeholder decision makers framework; and the Medical Research Council-Complex Intervention Development and Evaluation research framework. Results This schema represents the different types of decision aids that support PwKF and professional reasoning as they manage kidney disease individually and together; adjustments at micro, meso and macro levels supports integration in practice. Conclusion Innovating services to meet clinical guidelines on enhancing shared decision making processes means enabling all stakeholders to use decision aids to meet their goals within kidney pathways at individual, service and organizational levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary L Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Anna E Winterbottom
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Teresa Gavaruzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Andrew Mooney
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saeed F, Dahl S, Horowitz RK, Duberstein PR, Epstein RM, Fiscella KA, Allen RJ. Development and Acceptability of a Kidney Therapy Decision Aid for Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Design-Based Research Involving Patients, Caregivers, and a Multidisciplinary Team. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100671. [PMID: 37492114 PMCID: PMC10363565 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Many older adults prefer quality of life over longevity, and some prefer conservative kidney management (CKM) over dialysis. There is a lack of patient-decision aids for adults aged 75 years or older facing kidney therapy decisions, which not only include information on dialysis and CKM but also encourage end-of-life planning. We iteratively developed a paper-based patient-decision aid for older people with low literacy and conducted surveys to assess its acceptability. Study Design Design-based research. Setting and Participants Informed by design-based research principles and theory of behavioral activation, a multidisciplinary team of experts created a first version of the patient-decision aid containing 2 components: (1) educational material about kidney therapy options such as CKM, and (2) a question prompt list relevant to kidney therapy and end-of-life decision making. On the basis of the acceptability input of patients and caregivers, separate qualitative interviews of 35 people receiving maintenance dialysis, and with the independent feedback of educated layperson, we further modified the patient-decision aid to create a second version. Analytical Approach We used descriptive statistics to present the results of acceptability surveys and thematic content analyses for patients' qualitative interviews. Results The mean age of patients (n=21) who tested the patient-decision aid was 80 years and the mean age of caregivers (n=9) was 70 years. All respondents held positive views about the educational component and would recommend the educational component to others (100% patients and caregivers). Most of the patients reported that the question prompt list helped them put concerns into words (80% patients and 88% caregivers) and would recommend the question prompt list to others (95% patients and 100% caregivers). Limitations Single-center study. Conclusions Both components of the patient-decision aid received high acceptability ratings. We plan to launch a larger effectiveness study to test the outcomes of a decision-supporting intervention combining the patient-decision aid with palliative care-based decision coaching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Spencer Dahl
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Robert K. Horowitz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Paul R. Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Ronald M. Epstein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Kevin A. Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Rebecca J. Allen
- Mount St. Joseph University, School of Behavioral and Natural Sciences, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Todio E, Schofield P, Sharp J. A Qualitative Study of Men's Experiences Using Navigate: A Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Aid. MDM Policy Pract 2023; 8:23814683231198003. [PMID: 37719768 PMCID: PMC10501076 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231198003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC) often face a dilemma in choosing between available treatment options that have similar survival rates but for which the perceived advantages and disadvantages of each treatment differ. The Navigate decision aid was created to assist Australian men with LPC in making informed decisions about treatment that align with their personal values and preferences. Navigate presents current, unbiased information, including an interactive values clarification exercise. Objective. This study was a qualitative investigation of men's treatment decision making for LPC, and their experiences using the Navigate Web site, to identify areas for improvement and inform implementation. Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 men diagnosed with LPC who completed the intervention arm of the Navigate randomized controlled trial. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: Five main themes emerged: 1) diagnosis experiences varied, although men were strongly influenced by their clinician to make an early initial treatment decision; 2) men sought resources and support they trusted; 3) men valued Navigate's multiformatted content and design; 4) men suggested more content was needed on a) the diagnosis journey and b) new treatment updates; and 5) men identified design flaws in the values clarification exercise on Navigate but appreciated the tool being available. Conclusions. Specialist authority influenced men to make an early treatment decision. However, Navigate was helpful in supporting men's ongoing treatment decision making, particularly men on active surveillance who may face further treatment decisions if their cancer progresses. To gain trust and improve engagement from Navigate users, credentials and sources of information need to be prominent. Trustworthiness, timing of access, and the clinician's role in empowering men to use available decision aids are crucial elements to be considered when implementing Navigate in clinical settings. Highlights The Navigate decision aid Web site was created to help Australian men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC) make an informed decision about their treatment.Navigate was helpful in supporting men's ongoing treatment decision making for LPC.Men's treatment decision making for LPC was greatly influenced by perceived authority and trust in their clinician.Trustworthiness, timing of access, and the clinician's role in empowering men to use available decision aids are crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Todio
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Binion KE, Rode AU, Nortey G, Miller AD, Misseri R, Kaefer M, Ross S, Preisser JS, Hu D, Chan KH. A multi-site pilot study of a parent-centered tool to promote shared decision-making in hypospadias care. J Pediatr Urol 2023; 19:290.e1-290.e10. [PMID: 36801199 PMCID: PMC10278576 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using a user-centered design approach, we conducted a two-site pilot study to evaluate a decision aid (DA) website, the Hypospadias Hub, for parents of hypospadias patients. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to assess the Hub's acceptability, remote usability, and feasibility of study procedures, and to evaluate its preliminary efficacy. METHODS From June 2021-February 2022, we recruited English-speaking parents (≥18 years old) of hypospadias patients (≤5 years) and delivered the Hub electronically ≤2 months before their hypospadias consultation. We collected website analytic data using an ad tracker plug-in. We inquired about treatment preference, hypospadias knowledge, and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) at baseline, after viewing the Hub (pre-consultation), and post-consultation. We administered the Decision Aid Acceptability Questionnaire (DAAQ) and the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PrepDM) which assessed how well the Hub prepared parents for decision-making with the urologist. Post-consultation, we assessed participants' perception of involvement in decision-making with the Shared Decision-making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). A bivariate analysis compared participants' baseline and pre/post-consultation hypospadias knowledge, decisional conflict, and treatment preference. Using a thematic analysis, we analyzed our semi-structured interviews to uncover how the Hub impacted the consultation and what influenced participants' decisions. RESULTS Of 148 parents contacted, 134 were eligible and 65/134 (48.5%) enrolled: mean age 29.2, 96.9% female, 76.6% White (Extended Summary Figure). Pre/post-viewing the Hub, there was a statistically significant increase in hypospadias knowledge (54.3 vs. 75.6, p < 0.001) and decrease in decisional conflict (36.0 vs. 21.9, p < 0.001). Most participants (83.3%) thought Hub's length and amount of information (70.4%) was "about right", and 93.0% found most or everything was clear. Pre/post-consultation, there was a statistically significant decrease in decisional conflict (21.9 vs. 8.8, p < 0.001). PrepDM's mean score was 82.6/100 (SD = 14.1); SDM-Q-9's mean score was 82.5/100 (SD = 16.7). DCS's mean score was 25.0/100 (SD = 47.03). Each participant spent an average of 25.75 min reviewing the Hub. Based on thematic analysis, the Hub helped participants feel prepared for the consultation. DISCUSSION Participants engaged extensively with the Hub and demonstrated improved hypospadias knowledge and decision quality. They felt prepared for the consultation and perceived a high degree of involvement in decision-making. CONCLUSION As the first pilot test of a pediatric urology DA, the Hub was acceptable and study procedures were feasible. We plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial of the Hub versus usual care to test its efficacy to improve the quality of shared decision-making and reduce long-term decisional regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey E Binion
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Akash Uday Rode
- Department of Human-Centered Computing, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Gabrielle Nortey
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Andrew D Miller
- Department of Human-Centered Computing, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Rosalia Misseri
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Martin Kaefer
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Sherry Ross
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - John S Preisser
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Di Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Katherine H Chan
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thomas EC, Simmons MB, Mathai C, Salzer MS. Peer-Facilitated Decision Making in Mental Health: Promises, Pitfalls, and Recommendations for Research and Practice. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:401-406. [PMID: 36164774 PMCID: PMC10405208 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Recognition has grown that peer support workers serve an important role in facilitating decision making about treatment and recovery among people with mental health conditions. This article provides examples of peer-facilitated decision support interventions in the literature, discusses promises and potential pitfalls associated with peers serving in decision support roles, and offers recommendations for research and practice. Examples were selected from the literature on decision support interventions for people with serious mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression. Promises, pitfalls, and recommendations were informed by this research and by the literature on lived experience perspectives, the helper-therapy principle, and reported barriers to and facilitators of peers assisting with decision making. According to the included studies, peers may facilitate decision making in several ways (e.g., by asking service users about their goals or preferences, assisting them with using decision support tools, sharing stories, and facilitating access to information and resources). Peer-facilitated decision support may be associated with positive decision making and health outcomes for service users and peer support workers. However, providers need to carefully consider barriers to implementation of this support, such as inadequate resourcing, poor integration, and compromising of peer support values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Thomas
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University
| | - Magenta B. Simmons
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chacku Mathai
- Chacku Mathai Consulting LLC
- OnTrackNY and Center for Practice Innovations, Columbia University
| | - Mark S. Salzer
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Binion KE, Rode AU, Miller AD, Nortey G, Ross S, Misseri R, Kaefer M, Preisser JS, Hu D, Chan KH. Response to letter to the editor re 'A multi-site pilot study of a parent-centered tool to promote shared decision-making in hypospadias care'. J Pediatr Urol 2023:S1477-5131(23)00106-7. [PMID: 37029010 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey E Binion
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Akash Uday Rode
- Department of Human-Centered Computing, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andrew D Miller
- Department of Human-Centered Computing, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gabrielle Nortey
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sherry Ross
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rosalia Misseri
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Martin Kaefer
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - John S Preisser
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Di Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine H Chan
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Munro S, Di Meglio G, Williams A, Barbic SP, Begun S, Black A, Carson A, Fortin M, Jacob K, Khan Z, Martin-Misener R, Meherali S, Paller V, Seiyad H, Vallée CA, Wahl K, Norman WV. Can youth-engaged research facilitate equitable access to contraception in Canada? The qualitative study protocol for the Ask Us project. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070904. [PMID: 36863736 PMCID: PMC9990688 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is little to no evidence in Canada on the barriers that youth face when accessing contraception. We seek to identify the contraception access, experiences, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and needs of youth in Canada, from the perspectives of youth and youth service providers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This prospective, mixed-methods, integrated knowledge mobilisation study, the Ask Us project, will involve a national sample of youth, healthcare and social service providers, and policy makers recruited via a novel relational mapping and outreach approach led by youth. Phase I will centre the voices of youth and their service providers through in-depth one-on-one interviews. We will explore the factors influencing youth access to contraception, theoretically guided by Levesque's Access to Care framework. Phase II will focus on the cocreation and evaluation of knowledge translation products (youth stories) with youth, service providers, and policy makers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was received from the University of British Columbia's Research Ethics Board (H21-01091). Full open-access publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal. Findings will be disseminated to youth and service providers through social media, newsletters, and communities of practice, and to policy makers through invited evidence briefs and face-to-face presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Munro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Giuseppina Di Meglio
- Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Aleyah Williams
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Skye Pamela Barbic
- Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephanie Begun
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Black
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Carson
- Research, Innovation, and Discovery, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Michelle Fortin
- Options for Sexual Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kaiya Jacob
- Youth Partner, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Zeba Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Salima Meherali
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Victoria Paller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Carol-Anne Vallée
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kate Wahl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Housten AJ, Kozower BD, Engelhardt KE, Robinson C, Puri V, Samson P, Cooksey K, Politi MC. Developing an Educational and Decision Support Tool for Stage I Lung Cancer Using Decision Science. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:299-308. [PMID: 35926640 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend shared decision-making about treatment options for high-risk, operable stage I lung cancer. Patient decision aids can facilitate shared decision-making; however, their development, implementation, and evaluation in routine clinical practice presents numerous challenges and opportunities. METHODS The purpose of this review is to reflect on the process of tool development; identify the challenges associated with meeting the needs of patients, clinicians from multiple disciplines, and institutional workflow during implementation; and propose recommendations for future clinicians who wish to develop, refine, or implement similar tools into routine care. RESULTS In this review, we: (1) discuss guidelines for decision aid development; (2) describe how we applied those to create an education and decision support tool for patients with clinical stage I lung cancer deciding between radiation therapy and surgical resection; and (3) highlight challenges in implementing and evaluating the tool. CONCLUSIONS We provide recommendations for those seeking to develop, refine, or implement similar tools into routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley J Housten
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Benjamin D Kozower
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Kathryn E Engelhardt
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Clifford Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Varun Puri
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Pamela Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Krista Cooksey
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Mary C Politi
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schwartz PH, Sachs GA. Rethinking Decision Quality: Measures, Meaning, and Bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep 2022; 52:13-22. [PMID: 36537272 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Studies of patient decision-making use many different measures to evaluate the quality of decisions and the decision-making process, partly to determine whether the ethical goals of informed consent, patient autonomy, and shared decision-making have been achieved. We describe these measures, grouped under three main approaches, and review their limitations, leading to three conclusions. First, no measure or combination of measures can provide a complete assessment of decision quality. Second, the quality of a decision is best characterized vaguely, for instance as "good," "satisfactory," or "poor," and these categorizations depend on qualitative judgments that go beyond quantitative measures. Third, bioethicists should focus on identifying and addressing poor or problematic decisions, rather than trying to incrementally increase decision quality, quantified by a measure. Decision-quality measures can be useful in research and in advancing important goals of bioethics, as long as the challenges of defining and measuring decision quality are recognized.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ho YF, Hsu PT, Yang KL. Peritoneal dialysis after shared decision-making: the disparity between reality and patient expectations. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:268. [PMID: 36180845 PMCID: PMC9524315 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01043-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current health policy in Taiwan favors peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home. Policy objectives may make healthcare providers give more consideration to the introduction of PD treatment. This study aimed to explore the process of information acquisition and consideration during shared decision-making (SDM) for patients undergoing PD and compare their quality of life expectations before and after PD at home. Methods In this qualitative study, 15 patients undergoing PD for < 12 months were purposively recruited from one large PD unit in Taichung, Taiwan. Data were collected between August 2020 and December 2020 using a semi-structured interview. All transcripts were evaluated using thematic analysis. Results Three themes and seven subthemes were identified following data analysis: 1. sources for information on dialysis treatment, including (a) effect of others’ experiences and (b) incomplete information from healthcare providers (HCPs); 2. considerations for choosing PD, including (a) trusting physicians, and (b) maintaining pre-dialysis life; and 3. disparity between pre-and post-PD reality and expectation, including (a) limitation by time and place, (b) discrepancies in expected freedom and convenience, and (c) regret versus need to continue. Conclusion HCPs played an important role in SDM, providing key information that influenced the process. Patients undergoing initial PD at home exhibited a disparity between expectation and reality, which was exacerbated by incomplete information.
Collapse
|
16
|
Dealing with the Vicissitudes and Abject Consequences of Head and Neck Cancer: A Vital Role for Psycho-Oncology. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6714-6723. [PMID: 36135096 PMCID: PMC9497961 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with head and neck cancer face important life-altering effects in appearance and function, affecting distress and quality of life and requiring the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. Psycho-oncology makes an important contribution to the field, as head and neck cancers carry a huge adaptational toll. To illustrate the value of this discipline, we report two cases of patients with advanced head and neck cancer for which the treatment-related body changes were of major significance. A commentary by the treating surgeons and psycho-oncologists precedes a general discussion about the clinical management of such patients. The article outlines strategies to address health literacy, doctor–patient communication, treatment decision-making, and emotional distress; placing the person at the center of oncological care. It calls for the broad application of principles of psychological first aid by healthcare professionals in oncology.
Collapse
|
17
|
Hovick SR, Coduto KD, Medero K, Moyer-Gusé E, Senter-Jamieson L. Effects of Exposure to an Entertainment-Based Genetic Testing Narrative on Genetic Testing Knowledge, Attitudes and Counseling Discussion Intentions. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2022; 27:510-519. [PMID: 36281694 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2131941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
This study explores the effects of exposure to a reality television narrative depicting genetic testing on attitudes and intentions, looking particularly at the effects of narratives containing elements of misinformation on genetics-related knowledge accuracy. In an experiment, participants completed a baseline survey, viewed a high versus low-accuracy narrative, then completed a follow-up survey. Exposure to a low-accuracy narrative was associated with lower knowledge accuracy. Indirect effects of identification and transportation on intentions to talk to a doctor about genetic testing also were detected via attitudes and reduced message counterarguing. Results illustrate the negative implications of inaccurate narratives on knowledge, which is concerning given the public's low level of genetic literacy, as well as the critical role narrative engagement may play in shaping public attitudes and intentions regarding genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelly R Hovick
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kathryn D Coduto
- Department of Mass Communication, Advertising & Public Relations, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kristina Medero
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Emily Moyer-Gusé
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Williams A, Hutchings HA, Harris DA, Evans M, Harji D. Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056984. [PMID: 35705344 PMCID: PMC9204455 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 5%-10% of new rectal cancers are locally advanced (locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)) at presentation with 4%-8% recurring (locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) after initial treatment. Patients with potentially curable disease have to consider many trade-offs when considering major exenterative surgery. There are no decision tools for these patients and current resources have found to not meet minimum international standards. The overall aim of this study is to produce a validated patient decision aid (PtDA) to assist patients considering radical pelvic exenteration for LARC and LRRC created in line with international minimum standards. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a national, multicentre mixed methods project and has been designed in keeping with guidance from the International Patient Decision Aids Standard.This study is in four stages. In stage 1, we will develop the PtDA and its content using agile developmental methodology. In stage 2, we will assess the content and face validity of the PtDA using mixed-methods with key stakeholders. In stage 3, we will assess the feasibility and efficacy of the PtDA. In stage 4, we will establish the barriers and facilitators to the use of a PtDA in the outpatient setting. Questionnaires including the QQ-10, EORTC PATSAT-C33, Preparation for Decision-Making Scale and the NoMAD survey will be analysed during the study. Interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Research ethics approval from North of Scotland Research Ethics Service 19/NS/0056 (IRAS 257890) has been granted. Results will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals, presented in conferences and distributed through bowel research UK charity. External endorsement will be sought from the International Patient Decision Standards Collaboration inventory of PtDAs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019122933.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwen Williams
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Swansea University Health Board, Swansea, UK
- The School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Dean Anthony Harris
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Swansea University Health Board, Swansea, UK
- The School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Martyn Evans
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Swansea University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Deena Harji
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diotaiuti P, Mancone S, Falese L, Ferrara M, Bellizzi F, Valente G, Corrado S, Misiti F. Intention to Screen for Hepatitis C Among University Students: Influence of Different Communicative Scenarios. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:873566. [PMID: 35633800 PMCID: PMC9130485 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.873566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different narrative scenarios regarding students' intentions to undergo diagnostic screening for hepatitis C, and whether gender identification with the characters of the scenario could influence the students' intentions to undergo a medical test. A sample of 600 participants was administered three narrative scenarios with different frames (positive, negative, and ambivalent), including two gender options (male and female) for the main character of the story. A statistically significant three-way interaction between scenario, gender identification, and time resulted. There were significant simple main effects on the intention to have a diagnostic test for hepatitis C for the scenarios with the protagonist of the same gender as the participant and after the administration of the negative scenario. The use of a negative scenario with the same gender character was always more effective than the use of a positive framed scenario, even though there was a high level of knowledge regarding the disease. Personal diagnostic testing was not directly associated with knowledge regarding the infection. The findings of this study can ultimately help policymakers develop communication campaigns adapted to target populations such as college students, in order to raise awareness of the risk, promote prevention and behavioral change, and encourage medical screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Diotaiuti
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Stefania Mancone
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Lavinia Falese
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Maria Ferrara
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Fernando Bellizzi
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Valente
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Stefano Corrado
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Francesco Misiti
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morton K, Kohut K, Turner L, Smith S, Crosbie EJ, Ryan N, Grimmett C, Eccles DM, Foster C. Person-based co-design of a decision aid template for people with a genetic predisposition to cancer. Front Digit Health 2022; 4:1039701. [PMID: 36518561 PMCID: PMC9743799 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1039701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People with genetic predispositions to cancer are faced with complex health decisions about managing their risk. Decision aids can support informed, values-based decisions, alongside shared decision-making with a clinician. Whilst diagnoses of genetic predispositions to cancer are increasing, there is no scalable decision aid to support these people. This paper presents an accessible, relevant decision aid template which can be adapted for different predispositions to cancer. Methods The decision aid template was co-developed with 12 patients affected by cancer and informed by empirical and theoretical literature. In addition, consultations were conducted with a further 19 people with Lynch syndrome; a specific genetic predisposition to cancer. Clinical stakeholders were consulted regularly. Coulter's framework for decision aid development guided the process, and these activities were complemented by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, and the latest evidence on communicating risk in decision aids. Programme theory was developed to hypothesise how the decision aid would support decision-making and contextual factors which could influence the process. Guiding principles co-developed with the patient panel described how the decision aid could effectively engage people. Results The in-depth co-design process led to the identification of five core components of an accessible decision aid template for people with a genetic predisposition to cancer: defining the decision; option grid showing implications of each option; optional further details such as icon arrays to show tailored risk and personal narratives; values clarification activity; and a summary to facilitate discussion with a clinician. Specific guidance was produced describing how to develop each component. The guiding principles identified that the decision aid template needed to promote trust, reduce distress, and be comprehensive, personally relevant and accessible in order to engage people. Conclusion Adopting a co-design process helped ensure that the decision aid components were relevant and accessible to the target population. The template could have widespread application through being adapted for different genetic predispositions. The exact content should be co-designed with people from diverse backgrounds with lived experience of the specific predisposition to ensure it is as useful, engaging and relevant as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Morton
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Correspondence: Kate Morton
| | - Kelly Kohut
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lesley Turner
- Patient and Public Contributor, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Smith
- Aston University, College of Health and Life Sciences, School of Optometry, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emma J. Crosbie
- Department of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Ryan
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Chloe Grimmett
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Department of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sheridan SL. Translating Evidence Updates to International Standards: Is More Certainty Needed for International Standards on Decision Aids? Med Decis Making 2021; 42:3-7. [PMID: 34845947 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211063429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|