Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on intraoperative core temperature in patients undergoing posterior spine surgery: prospective randomised trial

Intraoperative Respiratory and Hemodynamic Strategies for Reducing Nausea, Vomiting, and Pain after Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite improved medical treatment strategies, post-operative pain, nausea, and vomiting remain major challenges. This systematic review investigated the relationship between perioperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions and postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched on March 8, 2021 for randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of perioperative respiratory or hemodynamic interventions in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Investigators reviewed trials for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed when feasible. GRADE was used to assess the certainty in the evidence.

RESULTS

This review included 65 original trials; of these 48% had pain, nausea and/or vomiting as the primary focus. No reduction of postoperative pain was found in meta-analyses when comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment, high (80%) to low (30%) fraction of oxygen, low (5-7 ml/kg) to high (9-12 ml/kg) tidal volume, or goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care. In the meta-analysis comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment maneuvers, patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery had less shoulder pain 24 hours postoperatively (mean difference in the numeric rating scale from 0 to 10: -1.1, 95% CI: -1.7, -0.5). In meta-analyses, comparing high to low fraction of inspired oxygen and goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting was reduced (odds ratio: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.87 and 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.85). The certainty in the evidence was mostly very low to low. The results should be considered exploratory given the lack of pre-specified hypotheses and corresponding risk of Type 1 errors.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence regarding the impact of intraoperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions on postoperative pain or nausea and vomiting. More definitive trials are needed to guide clinical care within this area. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full title: The prevalence of and predictors for perioperative hypothermia in postanaesthesia care unit

BACKGROUND

Hypothermia is a common clinical issue during the perioperative period. The patients with perioperative inadvertent hypothermia are associated with higher risk of postoperative complications and higher hospitalisation costs.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to explore the prevalence of and predictors for hypothermia in patients entering postanaesthesia care unit.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A rigorous retrospective cohort study was conducted according to the STROBE reporting checklist. A total of 7216 patients were enrolled in this study. The perioperative variables potentially related to hypothermia were collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to investigate the contributing factors.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of inadvertent hypothermia in postanaesthesia care unit was 21.3% (n = 1505). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age >65 (OR = 1.561, 95% CI 1.371-1.778, p < .001), non-supine position [lateral decubitus position (OR = 1.341, 95% CI 1.133-1.586, p = .001), lithotomy position (OR = 1.639, 95% CI 1.295-2.075, p < .001)], non-superficial surgery (OR = 2.195, 95% CI 1.566-3.077, p < .001), non-open surgery [laparoscopic surgery (OR = 1.205, 95% CI 1.020-1.423, p = .029), endoscopic surgery (OR = 1.430, 95%CI 1.084-1.887, p = .011)], the volume of intravenous infusion fluid >1000 ml (OR = 1.814, 95% CI 1.500-2.194, p < .001), blood transfusion (OR = 1.552, 95% CI 1.159-2.078, p = .003), operation performed in the summer or fall (OR = 1.874, 95%CI 1.656-2.122, p < .001) and use of dexmedetomidine (OR = 1.147, 95%CI 1.015-1.296, p = .028) were associated with increased risk of hypothermia. In contrast, our finding showed that body mass index ≥25 kg/m² (OR = 0.556, 95%CI 0.491-0.630, p < .001), higher baseline body temperature (OR = 0.641, 95%CI 0.541-0.761, p < .001) and duration of fasting ≥18 h (OR = 0.487, 95%CI 0.345-0.689, p < .001) were associated with decreased risk of hypothermia. Compared with non-hypothermic patients, patients with hypothermia were associated with prolonged length of hospital days (5 vs. 4 days, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

For patients admitted to postanaesthesia care unit after elective procedures, old age, non-supine position, non-open surgery, non-superficial surgery, large volume of intravenous infusion fluid, dexmedetomidine, blood transfusion and Summer or Fall operative season were associated with increased risk of hypothermia, whereas high body mass index, high baseline body temperature and long fasting duration were associated with decreased risk of hypothermia.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The outcomes of this study will raise the concerns of perioperative care team on hypothermia in surgical patients. Measures should be taken to improve perioperative hypothermia and clinical outcome.