Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up

Are current rates of uncemented fixation in total hip arthroplasty supported by the literature? An update on the uncemented paradox

The optimal fixation method in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. Initial concerns related to the long-term performance of cement fixation as well as cement disease led to the development of cementless implants, and registry data has indicated that the use of this type of fixation has increased in recent years. However, data from these same registries has not shown any improvement in outcomes when compared to cement fixation. On the contrary, while similar outcomes are seen when comparing these fixation types in younger patients (<70 years of age), cementless fixation has shown increased implant failure and revision rates in elderly patients (>70 years of age). Given the increased projected volume of THA in the United States over the next decade, it is important to utilise available data to make clinical decisions that minimise not only individual patient harm, but also the burden on the healthcare system itself. This review provides an overview of currently available outcomes data comparing cement and cementless fixation, as well as an updated analysis of current trends in fixation use in THA. We furthermore provide a comprehensive technique guide to help surgeons optimise cement fixation of the femoral component for THA and hemiarthroplasty.

Effects of Abaloparatide on Bone Mineral Density in Proximal Femoral Regions Corresponding to Arthroplasty Gruen Zones: A Study of Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Low hip bone mineral density (BMD) in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures, implant instability, and other complications. Recently, emphasis has been placed on bone health optimization: treating low BMD prior to a planned orthopaedic implant procedure in an effort to normalize BMD and reduce the potential risk of future complications. Abaloparatide is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved osteoanabolic agent for men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and a candidate drug for bone health optimization that, in addition to benefits at the spine, increases hip BMD and reduces nonvertebral fracture risk. We hypothesized that abaloparatide would improve BMD in proximal femoral regions surrounding a virtual THA stem.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis obtained dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip scans from 500 randomly selected postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from the Phase-3 Abaloparatide Comparator Trial in Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE, NCT01343004) study after 0, 6, and 18 months of abaloparatide (250 patients) or placebo (250 patients). Hip DXA scans underwent 3-dimensional (3D) modeling via 3D-Shaper, followed by virtual resection of the proximal femur and simulated placement of a tapered, flat-wedge hip stem that guided delineation of the Gruen zones that were fully (zones 1 and 7) or largely (zones 2 and 6) captured in the scanning region. Integral, cortical, and trabecular volumetric BMD, cortical thickness, and cortical surface BMD (the product of cortical volumetric BMD and cortical thickness) were determined for each zone.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, the abaloparatide group showed greater increases in integral volumetric BMD in all zones at months 6 and 18; cortical surface BMD in zones 1, 6, and 7 at month 6; cortical thickness, cortical volumetric BMD, and cortical surface BMD in all zones at month 18; and trabecular volumetric BMD in zones 1 and 7 at months 6 and 18.

CONCLUSIONS

Abaloparatide increases BMD in proximal femoral regions that interact with and support femoral stems, suggesting that abaloparatide may have value for preoperative or potentially perioperative bone health optimization in patients with osteoporosis undergoing THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Durability of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cementless Stems Without a Collar in Elderly Patients Age 75 Years and Over

BACKGROUND

Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in prevalence worldwide. However, cementless fixation in elderly patients is controversial due to the risks of periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening. This study evaluated outcomes in patients undergoing primary THA utilizing a cementless stem without a collar, comparing those less than 75 years to those older than 75 years.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2021, there were 2,605 cementless THAs performed by 4 surgeons utilizing a highly porous metal fixation surface without a collar and consistent clinical protocols. There were 469 patients who had an age ≥ 75 years. Revision rates, intraoperative fractures, and 90-day mortality were compared between cohorts. In the ≥ 75 year age group, there were more women, more American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification III or IV, a lower body mass index, and more kidney disease, osteoporosis, and thyroid disease (P ≤ .002).

RESULTS

All-cause revision rates trended lower for the ≥75 year age group compared to < 75 year (1.9 versus 3.5%, P = .082) at 20-months of follow-up. Moreover, there was no difference in all-cause femoral component revisions comparing ≥ 75 to < 75 year age groups (1.5 versus 2.2%, P = .375), with only 3 of 10 femoral revisions due to aseptic loosening being in the ≥ 75 year age group. Intraoperative fracture (0.2 versus 0.5%, P = .701) and 90-day mortality (0.2 versus 0.1%, P = .460) did not differ between ≥ 75 and < 75 year age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients had comparable revision rates compared to younger patients using cementless femoral fixation without a collar. Furthermore, there was no difference in 90-day mortality or intraoperative fracture rates. Study findings provide evidence for the safety and durability of cementless THA using collarless femoral stems in elderly patients ≥ 75 years of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome: A Rare Disaster Following Cemented Hip Arthroplasties-Clinical Considerations Supported by Case Studies

Severe symptoms such as hypoxemia, hypotension, and unexpected loss of consciousness may develop during surgical interventions that use polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), or as it is commonly known, bone cement. Physicians recognize this amalgam of clinical manifestations more and more as a distinct entity that bears the name of bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS). Trauma cases, especially hip fractures, are seen to have a higher incidence of developing this complication compared to orthopedic elective ones. This research aims to present a detailed description of six severe BCIS cases in order to raise awareness and to emphasize its importance. Five of them had fatal outcomes, which demonstrate the necessity of future research on this topic, as little is known about it presently. In the Discussion section, a narrative overview from the scientific literature is performed on potential risk factors, prevention measures, and management strategies. The experience gathered through this case series may aid medical staff in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, thus improving safety when cemented surgical techniques are used on a high-risk group of patients.

The effect of reduced bone mineral density on elective total hip arthroplasty outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and disruption of normal bony architecture are the characteristics of osteopenia and osteoporosis and in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) may cause failure of trabecular ingrowth. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of reduced BMD on outcomes following primary elective THA.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 650 elective THAs with a DEXA scan in their electronic health record (EHR) from 2011 to 2020 was conducted at an urban, academic center and a regional, health center. Patients were separated into three cohorts based on their t-score and the World Health Organizations definitions: normal (t-score ≥ - 1), osteopenia (t-score < - 1.0 and > - 2.5), and osteoporosis (t-score ≤ - 2.5). Demographic and outcome data were assessed. Subsidence was assessed for patients with non-cemented THAs. Regression models were used to account for demographic differences.

RESULTS

650 elective THAs, of which only 11 were cemented, were included in the study. Patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis were significantly older than those without (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and had a lower BMI (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). PFx was significantly greater in patients with osteoporosis when compared to those with normal BMD (6.5% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.04). No such difference was found between osteoporotic and osteopenic patients. The revision rate was significantly higher for osteoporotic patients than osteopenic patients (7.5% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.04). No such difference was found between the other comparison groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with osteoporosis were older with reduced BMI and had increased PFx after non-cemented elective THA. Understanding this can help surgeons formulate an appropriate preoperative plan for the treatment of patients with osteoporotic bone undergoing elective THA.

Cemented versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: A Study Based on National Claim Data in South Korea

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) between patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) undergoing noncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) and cemented THA using a national claim data in South Korea.

METHODS

We identified patients who received THA for ONFH from January 2007 to December 2018 using ICD diagnosis codes and procedural codes. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the fixation method: with or without cement. The survivorship of THA was calculated using the following end points: revision of both the cup and stem, revision of the single component, any type of revision, PJI, and PPF.

RESULTS

A total of 40,606 patients: 3,738 patients (9.2%) with cement and 36,868 patients (90.7%) without cement, received THA for ONFH. The mean age of the noncemented fixation group (56.2 ± 13.2 years) was significantly lower than that of the cemented fixation group (57.0 ± 15.7 years, P = 0.003). The risk of revision and PJI was notably higher in cemented THA (hazard ratio: 1.44 [1.21 to 1.72] and 1.66 [1.36 to 2.04], respectively). Noncemented THA had a higher 12-year survivorship compared with cemented THA with any revision and PJI as the end point.

DISCUSSION

Noncemented fixation had better survivorship than cemented fixation in patients with ONFH.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Non-database Comparative Studies on Cemented Versus Uncemented Femoral Stems in Primary Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Cemented and uncemented femoral stems have shown excellent survivorship and outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Cementless stems have become increasingly common in the United States; however, multiple large database studies have suggested that elderly patients may have fewer complications with a cemented stem. As conclusions from large databases may be limited due to variations in data collection, this study investigated femoral stem survivorship and complication rates based on cement status in non-database studies.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were utilized to identify articles for inclusion up until June 2021. Included articles directly compared outcomes and complications between patients undergoing primary THA without femoral stem cementing to those with cementing. Studies were excluded if they utilized large databases or consisted of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of trauma.

RESULTS

Of the 1700 studies, 309 were selected for abstract review and nineteen for full-text review. A total of seven studies were selected. Meta-analyses indicated substantial heterogeneity between studies. There were no differences in revision rates (cementless: 5.53% vs. cemented 8.91%, P = .543), infection rates (cementless: 0.60% vs. cemented: 0.90%, P = .692), or periprosthetic fracture rates (cementless: 0.52% vs. cemented: 0.51%, P = .973) between groups.

CONCLUSION

There is scarce literature comparing outcomes and complications between cemented and cementless femoral stems in primary elective THA without utilizing a database methodology. In our study, there were no differences in complications detected on meta-analyses. Given previous findings in database studies, additional high-quality cohort studies are required to determine if selected patients may benefit from a cemented femoral stem.

Short-Term Analysis of the Changes in the Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur After Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 110 Patients

Introduction

Mechanical loading continuously exposes the bone to remodeling processes. Increased load leads to a gain in bone mass, and reduced load results in a loss. After inserting a prosthesis, the proximal femur is bypassed in loading as the bodyweight shifts distally. This lack of load induces bone resorption according to Wolff’s law. To avoid this bone resorption, the implant's bending stiffness should be less than the femoral bone. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is a well-accepted method to measure periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Since the strength and durability of the fixation of a femoral prosthesis in cementless hip arthroplasty depend largely on the quantity and quality of the surrounding bone, preoperative and postoperative evaluation of the quantity and quality of the femoral bone is very important in the long-term prognosis of hip arthroplasty.

Materials and methods

A prospective study of 110 patients in the age group of 25-60 years who underwent uncemented total hip arthroplasty in our tertiary healthcare institution was performed. An uncemented, fully hydroxyapatite-coated implant from a single manufacturer was used in all the patients. All the patients were mobilized on the first post-operative day. The BMD was measured at the proximal femur and the distal tip using a DEXA scan. Gruen zones were used for calculating BMD at different anatomical locations in the femur, with particular importance to zones 1, 4, and 7.

Results

The pre-operative BMD in all zones measured, viz. zones 1, 4, and zone 7 of the affected side, was found to be significantly lower as compared to the BMD values on the control side (P< 0.05). The mean change in the mean BMD was calculated for all the zones and compared with each other using an unpaired t-test. The mean BMD changes were found to be significantly higher in zone 7 in comparison to both zones 1 and 4 (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Significant periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented THA in the femur was noted in Gruen zones 1, 4, and 7 during the first six months after THA, with the greatest bone loss in the femoral calcar area (zone 7). The lower the preoperative BMD of the patient, the greater the postoperative bone loss.

A Comparison of Risks and Benefits Regarding Hip Arthroplasty Fixation

Since the field-changing invention of noncemented hip arthroplasty fixation in the 1980s, noncemented fixation has been progressively replacing cemented fixation. However, analyses of fixation frequencies reveal new patterns in cement versus noncemented preferences. Although cementation is again gaining ground in the United States, noncemented models remain the dominant fixation mode, seen in more than 90% of all hip arthroplasties. This stark preference is likely driven by concerns regarding implant durability and patient safety. Although advances in surgical techniques, intensive perioperative care, and improved instrument have evolved in both methods, data from large arthroplasty registries reveal shifting risks in contemporary hip arthroplasty, calling the use of noncemented fixation into question. Varying risk profiles regarding sex, age, or health comorbidities and morphological and functional differences necessitate personalized risk assessments. Furthermore, certain patient populations, based on the literature and data from large registries, have superior outcomes from cemented hip arthroplasty techniques. Therefore, we wanted to critically evaluate the method of arthroplasty fixation in primary hip arthroplasties for unique patient populations.

RNA-seq Analysis of Peri-Implant Tissue Shows Differences in Immune, Notch, Wnt, and Angiogenesis Pathways in Aged Versus Young Mice

The number of total joint replacements (TJRs) in the United States is increasing annually. Cementless implants are intended to improve upon traditional cemented implants by allowing bone growth directly on the surface to improve implant longevity. One major complication of TJR is implant loosening, which is related to deficient osseointegration in cementless TJRs. Although poor osseointegration in aged patients is typically attributed to decreased basal bone mass, little is known about the molecular pathways that compromise the growth of bone onto porous titanium implants. To identify the pathways important for osseointegration that are compromised by aging, we developed an approach for transcriptomic profiling of peri-implant tissue in young and aged mice using our murine model of osseointegration. Based on previous findings of changes of bone quality associated with aging, we hypothesized that aged mice have impaired activation of bone anabolic pathways at the bone-implant interface. We found that pathways most significantly downregulated in aged mice relative to young mice are related to angiogenic, Notch, and Wnt signaling. Downregulation of these pathways is associated with markedly increased expression of inflammatory and immune genes at the bone-implant interface in aged mice. These results identify osseointegration pathways affected by aging and suggest that an increased inflammatory response in aged mice may compromise peri-implant bone healing. Targeting the Notch and Wnt pathways, promoting angiogenesis, or modulating the immune response at the peri-implant site may enhance osseointegration and improve the outcome of joint replacement in older patients. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed assess the clinical outcomes of elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures (FNFs) (AO/OTA: 31B/C) treated by initial uncemented total hip arthroplasty (UTA) or cemented total hip arthroplasty (CTA).

METHODS

This study involved consecutive elderly patients with osteoporotic FNFs (AO/OTA: 31B/C) treated by initial UTA or CTA in our medical centre from 2010 to 2015. The primary outcomes were the Harris hip score (HHS) and the rates of revision, loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation.

RESULTS

In total, 224 patients were included in the final analysis (UTA, n = 114; CTA, n = 110). The mean follow-up duration was 60 months (range, 32-68 months). The mean HHS was 75.34 ± 18.82 for UTA and 80.12 ± 17.83 for CTA. Significant dissimilarities were detected in the rates of revision, loosening, and periprosthetic fracture between UTA and CTA (14.0% vs. 5.5%, 20.2% vs. 10.0%, and 12.3% vs. 4.5%, respectively). A significant difference was also detected in the probability of revision between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with osteoporotic FNFs (AO/OTA: 31B/C) treated with CTA show greater improvements in functional outcomes and key orthopaedic complications than those treated with UTA.

Health technology assessment through Six Sigma Methodology to assess cemented and uncemented protheses in total hip arthroplasty

The purpose of this study is to use Health Technology Assessment (HTA) through the Six Sigma (SS) and DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) problem-solving strategies for comparing cemented and uncemented prostheses in terms of the costs incurred for Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the length of hospital stay (LOS). Multinomial logistic regression analysis for modelling the data was also performed. Quantitative parameters extracted from gait analysis, electromyography and computed tomography images were used to compare the approaches, but the analysis did not show statistical significance. The variables regarding costs were studied with the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. No statistically significant difference between cemented and uncemented prosthesis for the total cost of LOS was found, but the cost of the surgeon had an influence on the overall expenses, affecting the cemented prosthetic approach. The material costs of surgery for the uncemented prosthesis and the cost of theatre of surgery for the cemented prosthesis were the most influential. Multinomial logistic regression identified the Vastus Lateralis variable as statistically significant. The overall accuracy of the model is 93.0%. The use of SS and DMAIC cycle as tools of HTA proved that the cemented and uncemented approaches for THA have similar costs and LOSy.

Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the (1) indications, (2) preoperative precautions, and (3) stepwise technical details of modern femoral stem cemented fixation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Femoral stem cementation provides excellent implant longevity with a low periprosthetic fracture rate among patients with compromised bone quality or aberrant anatomy. Unfamiliarity with the details of modern cementation techniques among trainees who may lack frequent exposure to cementing femoral stems may preclude them from offering this viable option to suitable patients in later stages of their careers. As such, maximizing benefit from cemented femoral stem fixation among suitable candidates is contingent upon the meticulous use of modern cementation techniques. In addition to proper patient selection, modern cementation techniques emphasize the use of (1) pulsatile lavage of the femoral canal, (2) utilization of epinephrine-soaked swabs, (3) vacuum cement mixing, (4) retrograde cement introduction, (5) cement pressurization, and (6) the use of stem centralizers. Furthermore, identifying and optimizing the preoperative status of at-risk patients with pre-existing cardiopulmonary compromise, in addition to intraoperative vigilance, are essential for mitigating the risk of developing bone cement implantation syndrome. Further research is required to assess the utility of cemented femoral stem fixation among younger patients.

The management of displaced femoral neck fractures: a narrative review

This article serves to review the existing clinical guidelines, and highlight the most recent medical and surgical recommendations, for the management of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs). It stresses the need for multi-disciplinary intervention to potentially improve mortality rates, limit adverse events and prevent further economic liability.Globally, the incidence of FNFs continues to rise as the general population ages and becomes more active. The annual number of FNFs is expected to exceed six million by 2050. The increased burden of FNFs exacerbates the demand on all services associated with treating these injuries.The management of FNFs may serve as an indicator of the quality of care of the geriatric population. However, despite escalating health costs, a significant 30-day and one-year mortality rate, increased rate of peri-operative adverse events and sub-optimal functional clinical outcomes, continued controversy exists over optimal patient care.Much debate exists over the type of surgery, implant selection and peri-operative clinical care and rehabilitation. FNF care models, systematized clinical pathways, formal geriatrics consultation and specialized wards within an established interdisciplinary care framework may improve outcomes, mitigate adverse events and limit unnecessary costs. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:139-144. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200036.

Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the current literature regarding implant fixation in osteoporotic bone.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies have not only demonstrated the growing prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total joint replacement (TJR) but may also indicate a significant gap in screening and treatment of this comorbidity. Osteoporosis negatively impacts bone in multiple ways beyond the mere loss of bone mass, including compromising skeletal regenerative capacity, architectural deterioration, and bone matrix quality, all of which could diminish implant fixation. Recent findings both in preclinical animal models and in clinical studies indicate encouraging results for the use of osteoporosis drugs to promote implant fixation. Implant fixation in osteoporotic bone presents an increasing clinical challenge that may be benefitted by increased screening and usage of osteoporosis drugs.

Strain shielding for cemented hip implants

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival of hip implants is of increasing relevance due to the rising life expectancy. The biomechanical effect of strain shielding as a result of implant insertion may lead to bone resorption, thus increasing risk for implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures. Patient-specific quantification of strain shielding could assist orthopedic surgeons in choosing the biomechanically most appropriate prosthesis.

METHODS

Validated quantitative CT-based finite element models of five femurs in intact and implanted states were considered to propose a systematic algorithm for strain shielding quantification. Three different strain measures were investigated and the most appropriate measure for strain shielding quantification is recommended. It is used to demonstrate a practical femur-specific implant selection among three common designs.

FINDINGS

Strain shielding measures demonstrated similar trends in all Gruen zones except zone 1, where the volumetric strain measure differed from von-Mises and maximum principal strains. The volumetric strain measure is in better agreement with clinical bone resorption records. It is also consistent with the biological mechanism of bone remodeling so it is recommended for strain shielding quantification. Applying the strain shielding algorithm on three different implants for a specific femur suggests that the collared design is preferable. Such quantitative biomechanical input is valuable for practical patient specific implant selection.

INTERPRETATION

Volumetric strain should be considered for strain shielding examination. The presented methodology may potentially enable patient-specific pre-operative strain shielding evaluation so to minimize strain shielding. It should be further used in a longitudinal study so to correlate between strain shielding predictions and clinical bone resorption.