Protective ileostomy does not prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer

Diverting ileostomy in benign colorectal surgery: the real clinical cost analysis

There are three types of complications stoma related: ones related to its construction, ones related to its function and related to closure. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of complications related to the stoma presence and to identificate variables related to complications. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent sphincter-preserving elective surgery for benign condition between January 2013 and December 2020 at IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital in Negrar, Verona. Data were collected regarding demographics and complications associated with primary surgery, stoma closure and the interval period. Univariable and multivariable analysIs were conducted. A total of 446 (12.2%) diverting loop ileostomies were performed. At index procedure, 76 (17%) patients had complications and 34 patients had complications related to ileostomy creation. Twenty patients (4.4%) were re admitted before stoma closure for dehydration. One hundred and eighty-seven patients (41.9%) suffered from ileostomy management's problems. At univariate analysis, complications of having stoma are more frequent in elder patients (p = 0.013), ASA score > 2 (p = 0.02), IBD diagnosis (p = < 0.001) and patients who had ileostomy creation complications (p = 0.04). At stoma closure, 55 (12.3%) patients had complications. Forty-seven patients (10.5%) presented incisional hernia in the stoma closure site. Ileostomy closure complications are more common with ASA score > 2 (p = 0.01) and IBD diagnosis (p < 0.001). IBD was found an independent factor of poor outcome at the time of ileostomy creation and closure. Developing complications at the time of ileostomy creation is statistically related to develop complications during ileostomy maintenance at multivariable analysis A loop ileostomy is usually created to limit the potentially life-threatening consequenceS of anastomotic leakage, but it is not able to decrease the leak-related mortality, wound sepsis, postoperative bleeding and small bowel obstruction. Debate rises not only for its uncertain efficacy but also because of the significant morbidity related to stoma. The surgeon could use these data in order to tailor his surgical strategy to the patients and their disease.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Inevitable Price to Pay for Survival, or a Preventable Complication?

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer is frequent and often treated with sphincter-saving procedures that may cause LARS, a syndrome characterized by symptoms of bowel disfunction that may severely affect quality of life. LARS is common, but its pathogenesis is mostly unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of LARS and to identify potential risk factors.

METHODS

We performed an observational retrospective single center analysis. The following data were collected and analyzed for each patient: demographics, tumor-related data, and intra- and peri-operative data. Statistical analysis was conducted, including descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors.

RESULTS

Total LARS incidence was 31%. Statistically significant differences were found in tumor distance from anal verge, tumor extension (pT and diameter) and tumor grading (G). Multivariate analysis identified tumor distance from anal verge and tumor extension as an independent predictive factor for both major and total LARS. Adjuvant therapy, although not significant at univariate analysis, was identified as an independent predictive factor. Time to stoma closure within 10 weeks seems to reduce incidence of major LARS.

CONCLUSIONS

bold LARS affects a considerable portion of patients. This study identified potential predictive factors that could be useful to identify high risk patients for LARS.

Fluorescent ICG angiography in laparoscopic rectal resection - a randomized controlled trial. Preliminary report

Introduction

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most dangerous complications after rectal surgery. It can cause systemic complications, reduce the quality of life and worsen the results of oncological treatment. One of the causes of anastomotic leak is insufficient blood supply to the anastomosis. Intraoperative infrared angiography with indocyanine green (ICG) is expected to improve the assessment of intestinal perfusion and thus prevent anastomotic leakage.

Aim

To present the results of the use of ICG intraoperative angiography during rectal surgery in the prevention of anastomotic leakage.

Material and methods

The study included 76 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. Patients were randomized to 2 groups: Group I - 41 patients with ICG intraoperative angiography; and Group II - 35 patients without ICG imaging. Anastomotic leak, length of hospitalization, and complication rate were compared.

Results

Group I patients received intravenous ICG before the anastomosis. Average time of intestinal wall contrasting was 42 s (22-65 s). Average ICG procedure time was 4 min (3.2% of total time of surgery). Three (7.3%) patients after angiography revealed intestinal ischemia requiring widened resection. No anastomotic leak was found post-operatively, and no side effects were observed after administration of ICG. In group II, 3 (8.6%) anastomotic leakages were diagnosed, 2 of which required reoperation.

Conclusions

Intraoperative angiography with ICG in near-infrared light is a safe and effective method of assessing intestinal perfusion. ICG angiography may change the surgical plan and reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. It is necessary to continue the study until the assumed number of patients is reached.

One Decade of Declining Use of Defunctioning Stomas After Rectal Cancer Surgery in the Netherlands: Are We on the Right Track?

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of a defunctioning stoma in mitigating the consequences of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery is still debated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to reflect on a decade of rectal cancer surgery in terms of stoma construction and anastomotic leakage.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

This study used data from the Dutch Colorectal Audit from 2011 to 2020.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery with a primary anastomosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes were minor complications, admission to intensive care, length of stay, readmission, and patient death.

RESULTS

A total of 13,263 patients were included in this study. A defunctioning stoma was constructed in 7106 patients (53.6%). Patients with a defunctioning stoma were less likely to develop anastomotic leakage (7.9% vs 13.0%), and if anastomotic leakage occurred, fewer patients needed surgical reintervention (37.7% vs 81.1%). An annual decrease in the construction of a defunctioning stoma was seen (69.8% in 2011 vs 51.8% in 2015 vs 29.7% in 2020), accompanied by a 5% increase in anastomotic leakage (9.1% in 2011 vs 14.1% in 2020). A defunctioning stoma was associated with a higher occurrence of minor complications, increased admissions to the intensive care unit, longer length of stay, and more readmissions within 90 days.

LIMITATION

This retrospective study is susceptible to confounders by indications, and there could be risk factors for anastomotic leakage and the use of a stoma that were not regarded.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in defunctioning stomas is paralleled with an increase in anastomotic leakage. However, patients with a defunctioning stoma also showed more minor complications, a prolonged length of stay, more intensive care admissions, and more readmissions. In our opinion, the trade-offs of selective use should be individually considered. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C137 .

UNA DCADA DISMINUYENDO EL USO DE ESTOMAS DISFUNCIONANTES EN LOS CASOS DE CNCER DE RECTO EN HOLANDA ESTAMOS HACIENDO LO CORRECTO

ANTECEDENTES:Aún se debate el efecto benéfico de la confección de un estoma disfuncionante para limitar las consecuencias de la fuga anastomótica en los casos de cirugía por cáncer de recto.OBJETIVO:Reflexiones sobre una década de cirugía por cáncer de recto en términos de confección de estomas y de fugas anastomóticas.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo y observacional.AJUSTE:El presente estudio utilizó datos de la Auditoría Colorectal Holandesa entre 2011 y 2020.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos intervenidos por cáncer de recto con anastomosis primaria.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue evaluar la fuga anastomótica. Los resultados secundarios fueron las complicaciones menores, la permanencia en cuidados intensivos, la duración de la hospitalización, las rehospitalizaciones y las causas de muerte en los pacientes.RESULTADOS:Un total de 13.263 pacientes fueron incluidos en el presente estudio. Se confeccionó un estoma disfuncionante en 7.106 (53,6%) pacientes. Aquellos portadores de un estoma disfuncionante tenían menos probabilidades de desarrollar una fuga anastomótica (7,9 % frente a 13,0 %) y, si ocurría una fuga anastomótica, menos pacientes necesitaban reintervención quirúrgica (37,7 % frente a 81,1 %). Se observó una disminución anual en la confección de un estoma disfuncionante (69,8 % en 2011 frente a 51,8 % en 2015 frente a 29,7 % en 2020), acompañada de un aumento del 5 % en la fuga anastomótica (9,1 % en 2011 frente a 14,1 % en 2020). Un estoma disfuncionante se asoció con una mayor incidencia de complicaciones menores, permanencia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, una estadía más prolongada y más rehospitalizaciones dentro de los 90 días.LIMITACIÓN:Estudio retrospectivo susceptible de factores de confusión según las indicaciones, donde podrían no haber sido considerados ciertos factores de riesgo con relación a la fuga anastomótica y a la confección de un estoma disfuncionante.CONCLUSIÓN:La reducción de estomas disfuncionantes es paralela con el aumento de la fuga anastomótica. Sin embargo, los pacientes con un estoma disfuncionante también mostraron más complicaciones menores, una estadía prolongada, más admisiones a cuidados intensivos y más rehospitalizaciones. En nuestra opinión, las ventajas y desventajas del uso selectivo de estomas disfuncionantes deben ser consideradas caso por caso. Consulte Video Resumen en https://links.lww.com/DCR/C137 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Early stoma closure after low anterior resection is not recommended due to postoperative complications and asymptomatic anastomotic leakage

The safety of early stoma closure after lower anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer remains controversial. In this study, patients scheduled to undergo LAR and stoma creation for rectal cancer were recruited. In absence of anastomotic leakage on radiological examination, closure of the diverting ileostomy was performed within 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was incidence of the colorectal anastomosis leakage after early stoma closure. Because of the slow accrual rate, the study was closed before recruitment reached the planned number of patients (n = 20). Among the 13 patients enrolled between April 2019 and March 2021, early stoma closure was performed in seven patients (53.8%). Non-clinical anastomotic leakage, leakage identified only on radiological examination, occurred in five cases, resulting in rescheduling of stoma closure. One patient did not undergo early stoma closure due to ileus. After stoma closure, colorectal anastomotic leakage manifested in one case; its incidence rate was 14.2%. Surgical site infection occurred in 42.8% of patients. This study revealed that asymptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred frequently. Considering the low rate of successful cases and the high rate of complications, early stoma closure within 2 weeks after LAR should not be performed routinely. Trial registration: (UMIN000036382 registered on 03/04/2019).

Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the serious complications after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Defunctioning stoma (DS) is one of the most widely used approaches to prevent it; however, the effect of DS on the occurrence of AL remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate risk factors of AL and assess the effect of DS after anterior resection for rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for the data of 1840 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer from January 2014 to December 2019.

RESULTS

The results showed the overall AL incidence was 7.5%. Multivariate analyses revealed that males [odds ratio (OR) 1.562] and T3-T4 stage (OR 1.729) were independent risk factors for all patients. After propensity score matching analysis, the AL incidence was 14.1% in the group with no DS and 6.4% in the DS group (P<0.001). The clinical AL (grade B + grade C) incidence was 12.4% in no DS group and 4.6% in the DS group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study suggested that males and T3-T4 stage were independent risk factors of AL. In addition, DS could reduce the rate of symptomatic AL.

Severe complications from anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision with the protective loop ileostomy in three patients

Introduction and importance

A protective loop ileostomy is recommended in ultra-low rectal cancer to reduce the complications associated with anastomotic leakage (AL), but there are few studies on the complications after AL. The purpose of this study was to outline our experience in the successful treatment of severe abdominal infection after AL in rectal cancer patients with the protective loop ileostomy.

Case presentation

In this report, we describe three cases of AL after standard total mesorectal excision with the protective loop ileostomy. Severe abdominal infection occurred postoperatively. The patients were successfully treated by surgical reintervention and had an uneventful recovery. No recurrence was observed after 2 years.

Clinical discussion

We consider that pelvic floor reconstruction and extending the extubation time should be performed in patients with a high risk of AL. Moreover, when severe abdominal infection and early infectious shock occur after AL, immediate reoperation should be performed to minimize the complication.

Conclusion

Protective loop ileostomy can't decrease the re-operation rate for patients with AL. We should take preventive measures during and after the operation, as well as early detection and early treatment.

•

The protective loop ileostomy sometimes can’t prevent severe complications for patients with anastomotic leakage after TME operation

•

Severe abdominal infection needs operation immediately.

•

Pelvic floor reconstruction and extending the extubation time can reduce reoperation rate

Comprehensive testing of colorectal anastomosis: results of prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most threatening complications in colorectal surgery. Intraoperative testing of anastomosis may reduce the postoperative anastomotic leakage rates. This study aimed to investigate a novel comprehensive intraoperative colorectal anastomosis testing technique to detect the failure of the anastomosis construction and to reduce the risk of postoperative leak.

METHODS

This multi-centre prospective cohort pilot study included 60 patients who underwent colorectal resection with an anastomosis at or below 15 cm from the anal verge. Comprehensive trimodal testing consisted of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography, tension testing, air-leak, and methylene blue leak tests to evaluate the perfusion, tension, and mechanical integrity of the anastomosis.

RESULTS

Ten (16.7%) patients developed an anastomotic leakage. Trimodal test was positive in 16 (26.6%) patients and the operative plan was changed for all of them. Diverting ileostomy was performed in 14 (87.5%) patients. However, two (12.5%) patients still developed clinically significant anastomotic leakage (Grade B). Forty-four (73.4%) patients had a negative trimodal test, preventive ileostomy was performed in 19 (43.2%), and five (11.4%) patients had clinically significant anastomotic leakage (Grade B and C).

CONCLUSION

Trimodal testing identifies anastomoses with initial technical failure where reinforcement of anastomosis or diversion can lead to an acceptable rate of anastomotic leakage. Identification of well-performed anastomosis could allow a reduction of ileostomy rate by two-fold. However, anastomotic leakage rate remains high in technically well-performed anastomoses.