Orthokeratology lens-related Acanthamoeba keratitis: case report and analytical review

Contact Lenses in Therapeutic Care: A Comprehensive Review of Past Innovations, Present Applications, and Future Directions

Contact lenses have become integral tools in the realm of ocular therapeutics, extending beyond their primary function of refractive correction to encompass a diverse array of therapeutic applications. This review explores the evolving role of contact lenses in managing various ocular conditions, highlighting their efficacy in enhancing patient outcomes. Initially developed to correct refractive errors, contact lenses now serve as effective vehicles for delivering medications directly to the ocular surface, offering targeted treatment for conditions such as dry eye syndrome and corneal ulcers. Their ability to provide sustained moisture and facilitate drug absorption makes them indispensable in promoting corneal healing and managing chronic ocular surface diseases. Specialized contact lenses designed for irregular corneas, such as those affected by keratoconus, provide both optical correction and structural support, significantly improving visual acuity and patient comfort. Additionally, orthokeratology lenses have shown promise in controlling myopia progression in children by reshaping the cornea overnight, thereby reducing reliance on corrective eyewear during waking hours. In post-surgical settings, therapeutic contact lenses aid in epithelial regeneration and minimize discomfort, accelerating recovery and improving surgical outcomes. They also play a crucial role in protecting the cornea from external irritants and promoting a stable tear film, crucial for maintaining ocular health. Looking ahead, ongoing advancements in contact lens materials and designs promise further innovation in ocular therapeutics, paving the way for personalized treatment strategies and improved patient care. As such, contact lenses continue to evolve as essential therapeutic tools, offering tailored solutions for a spectrum of ocular conditions and contributing to enhanced quality of life for patients worldwide.

Rethinking Keratoplasty for Patients with Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Early "Low Load Keratoplasty" in Contrast to Late Optical and Therapeutic Keratoplasty

BACKGROUND

Early therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TKP) for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is thought to have a worse visual prognosis than the delayed optical penetrating keratoplasty (OKP) after successful conservative treatment of AK. This has led to a tendency to prolong conservative therapy and delay penetrating keratoplasty in patients with AK. This retrospective series presents the results of patients with AK that underwent early penetrating keratoplasty after reducing the corneal amoeba load through intensive conservative therapy, so-called "low load keratoplasty" (LLKP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of our department were screened for patients with AK, confirmed by histological examination and/or PCR and/or in vivo confocal microscopy, which underwent ab LLKP and had a follow-up time of at least one year between 2009 and 2023. Demographic data, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure at first and last visit, secondary glaucoma (SG), and recurrence and graft survival rates were assessed.

RESULTS

28 eyes of 28 patients were included. The average time from initiation of therapy to penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was 68 ± 113 days. The mean follow-up time after LLKP was 53 ± 42 months. BCVA (logMAR) improved from 1.9 ± 1 pre-operatively to 0.5 ± 0.6 at last visit (p < 0.001). A total of 14% of patients were under medical therapy for SG at the last visit, and two of them underwent glaucoma surgery. The recurrence rate was 4%. The Kaplan-Meier graft survival rate of the first graft at four years was 70%. The second graft survival rate at four years was 87.5%.

CONCLUSION

LLKP appears to achieve a good visual prognosis with an earlier visual and psychological habilitation, as well as low recurrence and SG rates. These results should encourage us to reconsider the optimal timing of PKP in therapy-resistant AK.

A snap-shot of orthokeratology lens rinsing habits: An online survey in a major eye hospital in Shanghai

PURPOSE

A hospital-based survey to explore lens rinsing habits of orthokeratology (ortho-k) patients, including the solution used for rinsing.

METHODS

An anonymous survey, via an online questionnaire, was administered to ortho-k lens wearers or their parents when they attended Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital for routine follow-up visits. Three major issues were investigated: basic demographics, lens rinsing solution used, and specific rinsing habits. Relationships between demographics and rinsing solution used and rinsing behaviours were explored.

RESULTS

Of the total of 541 online questionnaires delivered, 296 were completed and returned. The respondents were the person responsible for lens care, either the ortho-k users themselves, or their parents. The median age of the lens wearers was 12.0 years (range: 8-22 years), and the median period of ortho-k lens wear was 18.0 months (range: 1-109 months). The most common rinsing solutions reported were a particular brand of multidose preserved saline (28.4%), cooled boiled water (23.3%), and non-preserved multidose saline (16.2%). Overall, the main reason for choice of rinsing solution was recommendation of eye care practitioners (90.2%). The respondents with a longer lens wear history tended to use commercially available bottled water, drinking water, or cooled boiled water rather than non-preserved saline (unidose or multidose) (p ≤ 0.009) and were more likely to use the rinsing solution to soak their lenses (p = 0.009). Lens wearers who rinsed the lenses themselves tended to use tap water compared to those whose lenses were handled by parents (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate choice and usage of rinsing solution appeared to be a common issue among ortho-k lens wearers in Shanghai, China. The problem was more pronounced in long-term wearers and in those who performed rinsing themselves.

Akanthamöbenkeratitiden in Jugendlichen mit Orthokeratologielinsen

Hintergrund

Durch die rasant steigende Prävalenz der Myopie kommen zunehmend progressionshemmende Verfahren zum Einsatz. Auch die Orthokeratologie, basierend auf dem Ansatz des peripheren Defokus, erlebt eine Renaissance. Die gefährlichste Nebenwirkung der Orthokeratologie ist die mikrobielle Keratitis, unter ihnen eine Infektion mit Akanthamöben, welche oft spät diagnostiziert wird und potenziell visusbedrohende Verläufe nehmen kann.

Material und Methode

Diese Fallserie beschreibt die Diagnosefindung und den Behandlungsverlauf der Akanthamöbenkeratitis bei jugendlichen Patient*innen mit Orthokeratologielinsen, welche an der Spezialambulanz für Hornhauterkrankungen der Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde und Optometrie an der Medizinischen Universität Wien im Zeitraum eines Jahres betreut wurden.

Resultate

Vier Fälle von orthokeratologieassoziierten Akanthamöbenkeratitiden wurden mittels kornealer Konfokalmikroskopie und mikrobiologischer Verfahren zwischen August 2021 und August 2022 diagnostiziert. Die intensive Stufentherapie umfasste ein hochdosiertes, topisches Biguanid in Kombination mit einem Diamidinderivat, welches in der ersten Therapiephase mit antibakteriellen und antifungalen Augentropfen kombiniert wurde. Der Therapieverlauf und -erfolg wurde mittels der kornealen Konfokalmikroskopie beurteilt, und entsprechend angepasst.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Akanthamöbenkeratitis ist ein ernst zu nehmendes Erkrankungsbild im Zusammenhang mit Orthokeratologielinsen. Im Hinblick auf das Alter der Zielgruppe dieser myopieprogressionshemmenden Therapie sollte, neben sorgfältiger Patientenselektion, auf eine detaillierte Schulung der Kontaktlinsenträger in der Handhabung der Linsen sowie auf ein erhöhtes Bewusstsein für Zeichen einer frühen Infektion besonderes Augenmerk gelegt werden. Da alternative Möglichkeiten zur Myopieprophylaxe bestehen, müssen PatentInnen auf das Risiko der jeweiligen Methode hingewiesen werden.

Does Orthokeratology Wearing Affect the Tear Quality of Children?

Orthokeratology is currently known as one of the most effective methods of myopia control in the process of rapid deterioration of the global myopia prevalence. As orthokeratology is widely used, it is necessary to evaluate its complications reasonably and accurately. Eye surface problems in children, such as dry eyes, have received increasing attention. At present, there is no conclusive evidence on how orthokeratology affects the ocular surface, especially the tears. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the relationship between orthokeratology lenses and tears through meta-analysis. However, it is still challenging to get a convincing conclusion and a higher level of evidence in this meta-analysis. Reasons for this include limitation of study design, lack of clarity on important confounding factors, lack of appropriate statistical tools, and other biases. This paper will analyze the dilemma existing in the current research from different perspectives to provide meaningful information for future studies in this field.