1
|
Bandala C, Cifuentes-Chacón JP, Cortes-Vázquez A, Ruz-Barros R, Garrocho-Hernández L, Cortes-Algara A. Efficacy between Conventional Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery in Mexican Patients with Endometriosis: A Comparative Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3576. [PMID: 38930105 PMCID: PMC11205068 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background. Surgical management of endometriosis is essential, and deep endometriosis involves the invasion of endometrial tissue into other organs such as the bladder, ureters, and rectum. In Latin American countries, significant expertise has been achieved in conventional laparoscopy (CL); however, there is less experience in robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) because of the high cost of this technique. For this reason, studies comparing CL and RAL for the treatment of deep endometriosis in patients are scarce, making this study the first to share the experience of Mexican patients. Aim. The efficacy of CL vs. RAL in the management of deep endometriosis in Mexican patients was compared. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective and comparative study. We considered all patients treated with minimally invasive surgery for deep endometriosis between 2015 and 2023. Results. A total of 93 patients were included; 56 patients were treated with CL, and 37 patients were treated with RAL. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed in the postoperative length of stay, which was longer in patients treated with CL compared with those treated with RAL. Additionally, postoperative pain was less frequent in patients treated with RAL than in those treated with CL (p < 0.05). We did not observe a significant difference in operative time, blood loss, or perioperative complications between the two surgical techniques (p < 0.05). Conclusions. CL and RAL are effective methods for managing endometriosis in Mexican patients; however, RAL is beneficial for the treatment of deep endometriosis because patients experience postoperative pain less frequently than CL patients and have a shorter postoperative length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Bandala
- Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico; (C.B.); (A.C.-V.); (L.G.-H.)
| | - Juan Pablo Cifuentes-Chacón
- Departamento de Laparoscopia y Cirugía Robótica, Centro Médico Nacional “20 de Noviembre”, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, Mexico City 03100, Mexico; (J.P.C.-C.); (R.R.-B.)
| | - Alfredo Cortes-Vázquez
- Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico; (C.B.); (A.C.-V.); (L.G.-H.)
- Departamento de Laparoscopia y Cirugía Robótica, Centro Médico Nacional “20 de Noviembre”, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, Mexico City 03100, Mexico; (J.P.C.-C.); (R.R.-B.)
- UniReproMX Fertility Centre, Mexico City 06700, Mexico
| | - Rodrigo Ruz-Barros
- Departamento de Laparoscopia y Cirugía Robótica, Centro Médico Nacional “20 de Noviembre”, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, Mexico City 03100, Mexico; (J.P.C.-C.); (R.R.-B.)
| | - Leonardo Garrocho-Hernández
- Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico; (C.B.); (A.C.-V.); (L.G.-H.)
| | - Alfredo Cortes-Algara
- Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico; (C.B.); (A.C.-V.); (L.G.-H.)
- Instituto Materno Infantil del Estado de México, Toluca de Lerdo 50170, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pavone M, Baroni A, Campolo F, Goglia M, Raimondo D, Carcagnì A, Akladios C, Marescaux J, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Ianieri MM. Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:212. [PMID: 38753180 PMCID: PMC11098866 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01954-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a benign inflammatory onco-mimetic disease affecting 10-15% of women in the world. When it is refractory to medical treatments, surgery may be required. Usually, laparoscopy is the preferred approach, but robotic surgery has gained popularity in the last 15 years. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (LPS) in the treatment of endometriosis. This study adheres to PRISMA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO. Studies reporting perioperative data comparing RAS and LPS surgery in patients with endometriosis querying PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool (QUADAS-2) was used for the quality assessment of the selected articles. Fourteen studies were identified, including 2709 patients with endometriosis stage I-IV for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between RAS and LPS in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion rate and estimated blood loss. However, patients in the RAS group have a longer operative time (p < 0.0001) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.020) than those in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery is not inferior to laparoscopy in patients with endometriosis in terms of surgical outcomes; however, RAS requires longer operative times and longer hospital stay. The benefits of robotic surgery should be sought in the easiest potential integration of robotic platforms with new technologies. Prospective studies comparing laparoscopy to the new robotic systems are desirable for greater robustness of scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pavone
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
- Research Institute against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Alessandro Baroni
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Federica Campolo
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Goglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonella Carcagnì
- Facility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics - Gemelli Generator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jacques Marescaux
- Research Institute against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel Maria Ianieri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Piozzi GN, Burea V, Duhoky R, Stefan S, So C, Wilby D, Tsepov D, Khan JS. Robotic surgery for bowel endometriosis: a multidisciplinary management of a complex entity. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:31. [PMID: 38329622 PMCID: PMC10853297 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02904-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bowel endometriosis impacts quality of life. Treatment requires complex surgical procedures with associated morbidity. Precision approach with robotic surgery leads to organ preservation. Bowel endometriosis requires a multidisciplinary management to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes of bowel endometriosis undergoing multidisciplinary planning and robotic surgery. METHODS Consecutive cases of multidisciplinary robotic bowel endometriosis procedures (January 2021-December 2022) were evaluated from a prospectively maintained database in a national endometriosis accredited centre. Patients were managed through a multidisciplinary setting including gynaecologists, colorectal robotic surgeons, and other specialists. Dyschezia (menstrual and non-cyclical) and quality of life were assessed pre- and postoperatively (6 months) through validated questionnaires. RESULTS Sixty-eight consecutive cases of robotic bowel endometriosis were included. Median age was 35.0 (30.2-42.0) years. Median body mass index was 24.0 (21.0-26.7) kg/m2. Procedures performed were 48 (70.6%) shavings, 11 (16.2%) deep shavings, 3 (4.4%) disc excisions, and 6 (8.8%) segmental resections. One (1.5%) patient required temporary stoma. Median operating time was 150 (120-180) min. There were no conversions/return to theatre postoperatively. Median endometriotic nodule size was 25.0 (15.5-40.0) mm. Two (2.9%) patients developed postoperative complications. Median length of postoperative stay was 2 (2-4) days. Median follow-up was 12 (7-17) months. One (1.5%) patient recurred. Median menstrual dyschezia score improved from 5.0 (2.0-8.0) to 1.0 (0.0-5.7). Median non-cyclical dyschezia significantly improved (p < 0.001) from 1.0 (0.0-5.7) to 0.0 (0.0-2.0). Median quality of life score improved from 52.5 (35.0-70.0) to 74.5 (60.0-80.0). CONCLUSIONS Robotic multidisciplinary approach to bowel endometriosis provides good perioperative outcomes with improvement of dyschezia and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G N Piozzi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - V Burea
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
| | - R Duhoky
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - S Stefan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - C So
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
| | - D Wilby
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - D Tsepov
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK
| | - J S Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK.
- The Princess Grace Hospital Robotic Endometriosis Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK.
- University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Csirzó Á, Kovács DP, Szabó A, Fehérvári P, Jankó Á, Hegyi P, Nyirády P, Sipos Z, Sára L, Ács N, Szabó I, Valent S. Robot-assisted laparoscopy does not have demonstrable advantages over conventional laparoscopy in endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:529-539. [PMID: 38062181 PMCID: PMC10830624 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10587-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with endometriosis-related pain and infertility being the leading symptoms. Currently, the gold standard treatment approach to surgery is conventional laparoscopy (CL); however, the increasing availability of robot-assisted surgery is projected as a competitor of CL. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) and CL in endometriosis surgery. OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two procedures. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases. Studies investigating different perioperative outcomes of endometriosis-related surgeries were included. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Our search yielded 2,014 records, of which 13 were eligible for data extraction. No significant differences were detected between the CL and RAL groups in terms of intraoperative complications (OR = 1.07, CI 0.43-2.63), postoperative complications (OR = 1.3, CI 0.73-2.32), number of conversions to open surgery (OR = 1.34, CI 0.76-2.37), length of hospital stays (MD = 0.12, CI 0.33-0.57), blood loss (MD = 16.73, CI 4.18-37.63) or number of rehospitalizations (OR = 0.95, CI 0.13-6.75). In terms of operative times (MD = 28.09 min, CI 11.59-44.59) and operating room times (MD = 51.39 min, CI 15.07-87.72;), the RAL technique remained inferior. CONCLUSION RAL does not have statistically demonstrable advantages over CL in terms of perioperative outcomes for endometriosis-related surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ádám Csirzó
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dénes Péter Kovács
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anett Szabó
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Fehérvári
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Árpád Jankó
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Nyirády
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Sipos
- Medical School, Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary
- Medical School, Institute of Bioanalysis, University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Levente Sára
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nándor Ács
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - István Szabó
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sándor Valent
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
LONGO M, GAIA G, AFONINA M, ALBONI C, LA MARCA A. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: what is new? GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE 2023. [DOI: 10.23736/s0393-3660.22.04959-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
|
6
|
Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature). Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms221910554. [PMID: 34638893 PMCID: PMC8508982 DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis is a “mysterious” disease and its exact cause has not yet been established. Among the etiological factors, congenital, environmental, epigenetic, autoimmune and allergic factors are listed. It is believed that the primary mechanism of the formation of endometriosis foci is retrograde menstruation, i.e., the passage of menstrual blood through the fallopian tubes into the peritoneal cavity and implantation of exfoliated endometrial cells. However, since this mechanism is also observed in healthy women, other factors must also be involved in the formation of endometriosis foci. Endometriosis is in many women the cause of infertility, chronic pain and the deterioration of the quality of life. It also represents a significant financial burden on health systems. The article presents a review of the literature on endometriosis—a disease affecting women throughout the world.
Collapse
|