1
|
Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Srour R, Proust F, Thiery A, Wagner P, Noel G. Efficacy and Tolerance of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Skull Base Meningioma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:587-595. [PMID: 31673652 PMCID: PMC6817551 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Revised: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of normofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (RT) and intensity modulated RT with helical tomotherapy for skull base meningioma. Methods and Materials Between January 2009 and 2014, 46 patients with skull base meningioma were treated with normofractionated intensity modulated RT in stereotactic conditions (50%) or with helical tomotherapy (50%). Most of the lesions were localized in the cavernous sinus (59%). The mean planning target volume was 47.2 mL (range, 1.1-223 mL). Results After treatment, 5 lesions exhibited a partial response radiologically and 39 lesions were stable. At the time of treatment, 35 patients were symptomatic with a mean of 2 symptoms per patient. The most frequent symptoms were visual impairment (41%), cranial nerve dysfunction (20%), and headache (16%). The median follow-up time was 42 months (range, 10-76 months). After RT, 71% of patients exhibited an improvement of at least 1 symptom with a median interval of 15.6 months (range, 5.3-30.5 months). The most frequent improved symptoms were cranial nerve deficits (47%), visual impairment (45%), and headache (42%).The clinical response was correlated with the clinical target volume (CTV) margin (P = .06), extended clinical follow-up time (P = .004), and larger planning target volume (P = .05) by univariate analysis. Taking in account correlation factors, in the multivariate analysis, only CTV was a favorable significant factor of clinical improvement (P = .049; hazard ratio: 5 95%; confidence interval, 1.1-28). We observed 3 cases of trigeminal nerve dysfunction at 4.2, 5.7, and 24.6 months; 2 cases of visual disturbance at 10.1 and 24 months; 2 cases of neurocognitive disorders at 12.9 and 35.2 months; and 1 case of stroke at 20.3 months. Conclusions RT for skull base meningiomas is an effective and safe treatment, leading in most cases to clinical improvement. The addition of a CTV margin to meningioma volume improved the symptoms of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Brahimi
- University Radiation Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Delphine Antoni
- University Radiation Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratory of Radiobiology, Federation of Translational Medicine, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - Robin Srour
- Neurosurgery Department, Hôpital Pasteur, Colmar, France
| | - François Proust
- Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alicia Thiery
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pierre Wagner
- Radiology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Georges Noel
- University Radiation Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratory of Radiobiology, Federation of Translational Medicine, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Treatment of grade II–III intracranial meningioma with helical tomotherapy. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 59:190-196. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
3
|
Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Srour R, Proust F, Cebula H, Labani A, Noël G. [Base of the skull meningioma: Efficacy, clinical tolerance and radiological evaluation after radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:264-286. [PMID: 29773473 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Skull base meningioma leads to functional disturbances, which can significantly alter the quality of life. The optimal management of these lesions, whose goals are neurological preservation and tumour local control, is not yet clearly established. It is widely recognized that the goal of a radical excision should be abandoned despite the advances in the field of microsurgery of skull base lesions. Although less morbid, partial tumour excision would be associated with increased risk of local tumour recurrence. Although discussed both exclusive and adjuvant have proven to be highly successful in terms of clinical improvement and local control. Various radiation techniques have demonstrated their efficacy in the management of this pathology. However, high rates of clinical improvement are in contrast with low rates of radiological improvement. The notion of clinical and radiological dissociation appeared. However, in most of these studies, the analysis of the radiological response could be subject of legitimate criticism. This work proposes to review the local control, the efficacy and the clinical tolerance and the radiological response of the various radiation techniques for the meningioma of the base of the skull and to demonstrate the interest of quantitative volumetric analyses in the follow-up of meningioma after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Brahimi
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - D Antoni
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - R Srour
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Pasteur, 39, avenue de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, France
| | - F Proust
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - H Cebula
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - A Labani
- Service de radiologie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical outcome after high-precision radiotherapy for skull base meningiomas: Pooled data from three large German centers for radiation oncology. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:274-279. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Revised: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
5
|
Dittmar JO, Kratochwil C, Dittmar A, Welzel T, Habermehl D, Rieken S, Giesel FL, Haberkorn U, Debus J, Combs SE. First intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI, FET- and DOTATOC- PET in patients with intracranial meningiomas. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:169. [PMID: 29110720 PMCID: PMC5674744 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0913-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For irradiation treatment planning of meningiomas the use of PET-scans is well established. The most frequently used tracers are either based on amino acids or the somatostatin receptor ligand DOTATOC. Since up to now no inter-institutionally accepted standard PET-tracer has been defined, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of these different types of PET-tracers on the GTV-definition. Methods Twenty-one patients suffering from intracranial meningiomas underwent CT, MRI, FET- and DOTATOC-PET. First, tumour extension was delineated after image-fusion of CT and MRI (GTVCT/MRI). Then distinct GTVs based either on FET- or DOTATOC-PET were contoured and compared with each other as well with GTVCT/MRI. Results Every tumour showed typical enhancement of DOTATOC, but two meningiomas remained FET-negative. The mean relative overlap volume of GTVFET and GTVDOTATOC was only 41.9% and there was a significantly stronger correlation between GTVCT/MRI and GTVDOTATOC than between GTVCT/MRI and GTVFET. Conclusions Further investigations are necessary to clarify the minor conformity of DOTATOC- and FET-PET in meningiomas. Because of the receptor targeting, DOTATOC is known to be more specific for meningiomas and will remain the standard in our institution with the known limitation in areas nearby the pituitary gland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Oliver Dittmar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Kratochwil
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Dittmar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frederik L Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang ZX, Shen JT, Li YP, Zhao K, Shi CH, Xiao Y, Yu JJ, Guo WD, Li CC, Wang YQ, Li XL. Helical tomotherapy for cancer treatment: a rapid health technology assessment. J Evid Based Med 2014; 7:192-218. [PMID: 25156336 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 06/09/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Helical tomotherapy (HT) can be applied to treat complex malignant cancer with high-precise radiotherapy, and it can reduce the damage to normal tissues and improve treatment effects. But the procurement of HT must be approved by relevant departments of administration affairs. This study, appointed by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China and undertook by the National Health Development Research Center and the Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, was aimed to rapidly assess the effectiveness, safety, costs, and applicability of HT, so as to provide currently available best evidence for decision-makers of health policies. METHODS We electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, and other professional websites. Two reviewer independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed quality, and then performed descriptive analysis. RESULTS (i) We finally included 150 studies, encompassing 5 HTAs, 18 CCTs, and 127 observational studies. (ii) The included HTAs were published during 2006-2009, providing fairly less evidence of low quality and the results of 145 primary studies showed that: HT had been used mainly in the treatments of 14 kinds of cancer, with low total toxicity and high survival rates. Although the quality of the included studies was poor, there was much evidence about prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, nasopharynx cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer and liver cancer, with enough sample and fairly reliable results in HT efficacy and safety. And (iii) a total of 56 clinical trials were registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, most of which were registered by the occident. Among them, 9 were completed but the results had not been published yet. CONCLUSIONS The evidence of this study showed that, HT is safe and effective in clinic. But the abovementioned conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more high-quality studies with long-term follow-up. The costs of HT in procurement, maintenance, and application are high; and the skills, training, and qualification of operators are required. We suggest that the procurement of HT should be reduced; it should be allocated rationally and effectively used after comprehensive assessment in China's cancer epidemiology characteristics, health resource allocation, disease burden, medical service level, etc.; and also high-quality studies with long-term follow-up should be financially supported on the basis of establishing projects, so as to provide local evidence and consistently guide and improve scientific decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zong Xia Yang
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Combs SE, Ganswindt U, Foote RL, Kondziolka D, Tonn JC. State-of-the-art treatment alternatives for base of skull meningiomas: complementing and controversial indications for neurosurgery, stereotactic and robotic based radiosurgery or modern fractionated radiation techniques. Radiat Oncol 2012; 7:226. [PMID: 23273161 PMCID: PMC3551826 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-7-226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2012] [Accepted: 12/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
For skull base meningiomas, several treatment paradigms are available: Observation with serial imaging, surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, radiation therapy or some combination of both. The choice depends on several factors. In this review we evaluate different treatment options, the outcome of modern irradiation techniques as well as the clinical results available, and establish recommendations for the treatment of patients with skull-base meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|