1
|
Alqahtani MM. Whole-Body SPECT/CT: Protocol Variation and Technical Consideration-A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1827. [PMID: 39202315 PMCID: PMC11353707 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Introducing a hybrid imaging approach, such as single-photon emission computerized tomography with X-ray computed tomography (SPECT)/CT, improves diagnostic accuracy and patient management. The ongoing advancement of SPECT hardware and software has resulted in the clinical application of novel approaches. For example, whole-body SPECT/CT (WB-SPECT/CT) studies cover multiple consecutive bed positions, similar to positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT). WB-SPECT/CT proves to be a helpful tool for evaluating bone metastases (BM), reducing equivocal findings, and enhancing user confidence, displaying effective performance in contrast to planar bone scintigraphy (PBS). Consequently, it is increasingly utilized and might substitute PBS, which leads to new questions and issues concerning the acquisition protocol, patient imaging time, and workflow process. Therefore, this review highlights various aspects of WB-SPECT/CT acquisition protocols that need to be considered to help understand WB-SPECT/CT workflow processes and optimize imaging protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansour M. Alqahtani
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia;
- Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim K, Ha M, Kim SJ. Comparative Study of Different Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Bone Metastases of Prostate Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2024; 49:312-318. [PMID: 38350066 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000005078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of 8 different imaging modalities for preoperative detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients by performing a network meta-analysis using direct comparison studies with 2 or more imaging techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies evaluating the performances of 8 different imaging modalities for the preoperative detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. The network meta-analysis was performed in patient-based analysis. The consistency was evaluated by examining the agreement between direct and indirect treatment effects, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were obtained to calculate the probability of each imaging modality being the most effective diagnostic method. RESULTS A total of 999 patients from 13 direct comparison studies using 8 different imaging modalities for preoperative detection or follow-up of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients were included. For the detection of bone metastases of prostate cancer, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed the highest SUCRA values of sensitivity, positive predictive value, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio. In addition, 18 F-NaF PET/CT and SPECT/CT showed high SUCRA values. CONCLUSIONS 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed the highest SUCRA values. Other imaging modalities showed complementary diagnostic roles for preoperative detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer, except bone scintigraphy and MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mihyang Ha
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gravestock P, Somani BK, Tokas T, Rai BP. A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031186. [PMID: 36769834 PMCID: PMC9918161 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of prostate cancer imaging is rapidly evolving, with many changes to the way patients are diagnosed, staged, and monitored for recurrence following treatment. New developments, including the potential role of imaging in screening and the combined diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the field of theranostics, are underway. In this paper, we aim to outline the current landscape in prostate cancer imaging and look to the future at the potential modalities and applications to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Bhavan Prasad Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Whole-body single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for assessment of oncological bone disease - is an extended field of view (from vertex to toes) of clinical value? Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:131-136. [PMID: 36524763 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Whole-body single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (WB-SPECT/CT) is useful for diagnosing bone metastases. When performed on a dual-headed gamma camera, this may cover from clavicles to proximal femurs due to time constraints. In contrast, the novel 360 o cadmium-zinc-telluride scanner can perform WB-SPECT/CT (from vertex to toes) in approximately 20 min. The aim was to assess the prevalence of additional findings above the clavicles and below the lesser trochanters and the prevalence of incidental findings in the CT component. METHODS Retrospective study of 117 WB-SPECT/CT scans for oncological bone assessment over a 4-month-period. Scan analysis was performed by two independent experienced radionuclide radiologists. RESULTS The male:female ratio was 71:46 and the mean patient age was 68 years. The primary malignancies were predominantly prostate 65/117 (55.6%) and breast 40/117 (34.2%). There were additional findings of malignancy above the clavicles in 16/116 scans (13.8%) and below the lesser trochanters in 16/117 scans (13.7%). Two cases in the 'above the clavicles' group were suspected solitary metastases, whereas four cases in the 'below lesser trochanters' group were bone metastases at risk of pathological fracture. Incidental findings of clinical significance included suspected new malignancy in 11/117 (9.4%). CONCLUSION A WB-SPECT/CT (from vertex to toes) oncological bone protocol is useful for the detection of additional findings of clinical significance above the clavicles and below the lesser trochanters. Reviewing and reporting the CT findings in SPECT/CT is important.
Collapse
|
5
|
de Leiris N, Leenhardt J, Boussat B, Montemagno C, Seiller A, Phan Sy O, Roux J, Laramas M, Verry C, Iriart C, Fiard G, Long JA, Descotes JL, Vuillez JP, Riou L, Djaileb L. Does whole-body bone SPECT/CT provide additional diagnostic information over [18F]-FCH PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in the setting of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence? Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:58. [PMID: 32787923 PMCID: PMC7425051 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00333-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess whether whole-body (WB) bone SPECT/CT provides additional diagnostic information over [18F]-FCH PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in the setting of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (PC-BR). METHODS Patients referred for a PC-BR and whom benefited from a WB bone SPECT/CT and FCH PET/CT were retrospectively included. Tests were classified as positive, equivocal, or negative for bone metastases. A best valuable comparator (BVC) strategy including imaging and follow-up data was used to determine the metastatic status in the absence of systematic histological evaluation. RESULTS Between January 2011 and November 2017, 115 consecutive patients with a PC-BR were evaluated. According to the BVC, 30 patients had bone metastases and 85 patients did not present with bone lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 86.7% [69.3-96.2], 98.8% [93.6-100.0], 96.3% [78.7-99.5], and 95.5% [89.4-98.1] for WB bone SPECT/CT and 93.3% [77.9-99.2], 100.0% [95.8-100.0], 100.0 and 97.7% [91.8-99.4] for FCH PET/CT. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases between WB Bone SPECT/CT (AUC 0.824 [0.74-0.90]) and FCH PET/CT (AUC 0.829 [0.75-0.90], p = 0.41). CONCLUSION Despite good performances for the diagnosis of bone metastases in PC-BR, WB bone SPECT/CT does not provide additive diagnostic information over concomitant FCH PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas de Leiris
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France. .,INSERM, U1039, Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques, Grenoble, France.
| | - Julien Leenhardt
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,INSERM, U1039, Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques, Grenoble, France
| | - Bastien Boussat
- Public Health Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Olivier Phan Sy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Julie Roux
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,INSERM, U1039, Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques, Grenoble, France
| | - Mathieu Laramas
- Department of Oncology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Camille Verry
- Department of Radiotherapy, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Carole Iriart
- Department of Radiotherapy, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Gaelle Fiard
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Alexandre Long
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Luc Descotes
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Vuillez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,INSERM, U1039, Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques, Grenoble, France
| | - Laurent Riou
- INSERM, U1039, Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques, Grenoble, France
| | - Loïc Djaileb
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,INSERM, U1039, Radiopharmaceutiques Biocliniques, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Petersen LJ, Johansen MN, Strandberg J, Stenholt L, Zacho HD. Reporting and handling of equivocal imaging findings in diagnostic studies of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Acta Radiol 2020; 61:1096-1104. [PMID: 31821767 DOI: 10.1177/0284185119890087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Equivocal scanning results occur. It remains unclear how these results are presented and their management influence diagnostic characteristics. PURPOSE To investigate the reporting and handling of equivocal imaging findings in diagnostic studies of bone metastases, and to assess the impact on diagnostic performance of the methods used to analyze equivocal findings. The conceptual issue was reified based on two actual observations. MATERIAL AND METHODS A recent meta-analysis of bone metastases in prostate cancer was conducted and data were obtained from a large clinical trial with a true reference of bone metastasis, where diagnostic characteristics were calculated with equivocal scans handled by: removal; considered malignant; considered benign; and intention-to-diagnose. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 18 trials where the median proportion of reported equivocal results was 27%. Eleven (61%) studies reported an equivocal option for the index test, 42% reported equivocal results and described how these were analyzed. The clinical trial included 583 prostate cancer patients with 20% equivocal results. The different methods of managing equivocal findings resulted in highly variable outcomes: sensitivity = 85%-100%; specificity = 78%-99%; and positive and negative predictive values = 44%-94% and 97%-100%, respectively. The diagnostic performances obtained using the four methods were differentially susceptible to the proportion of equivocal imaging findings and the prevalence of bone metastases. CONCLUSION Reporting of equivocal results was inadequate in bone imaging trials. The handling of equivocal findings strongly influenced diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars J Petersen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Jesper Strandberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Louise Stenholt
- The Medical Library, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pesapane F, Downey K, Rotili A, Cassano E, Koh DM. Imaging diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:79. [PMID: 32548731 PMCID: PMC7297923 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00885-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerous imaging modalities may be used for the staging of women with advanced breast cancer. Although bone scintigraphy and multiplanar-CT are the most frequently used tests, others including PET, MRI and hybrid scans are also utilised, with no specific recommendations of which test should be preferentially used. We review the evidence behind the imaging modalities that characterise metastases in breast cancer and to update the evidence on comparative imaging accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO - European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milano, MI, Italy.
| | - Kate Downey
- Department of Breast Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Anna Rotili
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO - European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milano, MI, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO - European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milano, MI, Italy
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, UK.,Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2019; 48:1915-1924. [PMID: 31127357 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03230-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS We searched PubMed and Embase for articles published between January 1990 and September 2018. Two evaluators independently extracted the sensitivity, specificity, the numbers of true and false positives, and true and false negatives. We calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each method. We calculated the tests' diagnostic odds ratios (DOR); drew the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves; and obtained the areas under the curves (AUC), Q* values, and 95% CIs. RESULTS The per-patient pooled sensitivities of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and BS were 0.97, 0.87, 0.96, 0.91, and 0.86, respectively. The pooled specificities were 1.00, 0.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 0.95, respectively. The pooled DOR values were 504.16, 673.67, 242.63, and 114.44, respectively. The AUC were 1.00, 0.99, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.95, respectively. The per-lesion pooled sensitivities of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone imaging were 0.88, 0.80, 0.97, 0.81 and 0.68, respectively. CONCLUSIONS According to the meta-analysis, PSMA-PET/CT had the highest per-patient sensitivity and specificity in detecting bone metastases with prostate cancer. The sensitivities of NaF-PET/CT and MRI were better than those for choline-PET/CT and BS. The specificity of PSMA-PET/CT was significantly better than BS. Others were similar. For per-lesion, NaF-PET/CT had the highest sensitivity, PSMA-PET/CT had higher sensitivity than choline-PET/CT and MRI, and BS had the lowest sensitivity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fleury V, Ferrer L, Colombié M, Rusu D, Le Thiec M, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Campion L, Rousseau C. Advantages of systematic trunk SPECT/CT to planar bone scan (PBS) in more than 300 patients with breast or prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:31744-31752. [PMID: 30167091 PMCID: PMC6114966 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PROPOSE The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential benefit of a systematic trunk SPECT/CT associated with a Planar Bone Scan (PBS) in breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PCa) patients at initial staging or recurrence. RESULTS In 328 patients, sensitivities and specificities were between 74.4-93% and 78.8-97.5% for PBS and 97.7-100% and 96.8-98.6% for SPECT/CT respectively. PBS was considered equivocal for 67 compared to only 6 patients for trunk SPECT/CT. Regardless of "optimistic" or "pessimistic" analysis of equivocal trunk SPECT/CT lesions, the trunk SPECT/CT was almost perfect, allowing to rely on this result for excluding metastatic disease which was corroborated by ROC curve analysis. The trunk SPECT/CT allowed downstaging for 62 patients (19%) and upstaging for 11 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS PBS and a trunk SPECT/CT were systematically performed in all patients. Independent review of PBS and trunk SPECT/CT was performed for each patient and an abnormality interpretative score (Sc) with 3 levels was built: Sc 1: metastatic or probably metastatic pattern, Sc 2: equivocal pattern, Sc 3: benign or probably benign pattern or no abnormality. The bone pattern status was defined by at least 1 year follow-up. The clinical impact was evaluated in terms of down and upstaging in patient analysis. CONCLUSIONS Trunk SPECT/CT improves the performance of PBS in BC and PCa assessments and results in improvements in both the detection performance of bone metastases as well as a better characterization of equivocal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Fleury
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Ludovic Ferrer
- Nantes-Angers Cancer Research Center, INSERM U892, CNRS UMR 6299, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
- Medical Physics Unit, ICO Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France
| | | | - Daniéla Rusu
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Maëlle Le Thiec
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France
- Nantes-Angers Cancer Research Center, INSERM U892, CNRS UMR 6299, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Loïc Campion
- Nantes-Angers Cancer Research Center, INSERM U892, CNRS UMR 6299, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
- Biometrics Unit, ICO Gauducheau Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Caroline Rousseau
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France
- Nantes-Angers Cancer Research Center, INSERM U892, CNRS UMR 6299, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kitz J, Lowes LE, Goodale D, Allan AL. Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis in Preclinical Mouse Models of Metastasis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2018; 8:E30. [PMID: 29710776 PMCID: PMC6023422 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8020030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The majority of cancer deaths occur because of metastasis since current therapies are largely non-curative in the metastatic setting. The use of in vivo preclinical mouse models for assessing metastasis is, therefore, critical for developing effective new cancer biomarkers and therapies. Although a number of quantitative tools have been previously developed to study in vivo metastasis, the detection and quantification of rare metastatic events has remained challenging. This review will discuss the use of circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis as an effective means of tracking and characterizing metastatic disease progression in preclinical mouse models of breast and prostate cancer and the resulting lessons learned about CTC and metastasis biology. We will also discuss how the use of clinically-relevant CTC technologies such as the CellSearch® and Parsortix™ platforms for preclinical CTC studies can serve to enhance the study of cancer biology, new biomarkers, and novel therapies from the bench to the bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Kitz
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - Lori E Lowes
- Flow Cytometry and Special Hematology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - David Goodale
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - Alison L Allan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Departments of Anatomy & Cell Biology and Oncology, Lawson Health Research Institute, Western University, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rahbar K, Konnert J, Bögemann M, Stegger L, Bräuer A. Diagnostic value of additional 68Ga-PSMA-PET before 223Ra-dichloride therapy in patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma. Nuklearmedizin 2018; 56:14-22. [DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0846-16-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
SummaryPurpose: Medical imaging plays an important role in selecting patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for 223Ra- dichloride therapy of bone metastases. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether 68Ga-PSMA-PET has incremental value over conventional imaging for selecting patients suitable for 223Ra-dichloride therapy. Methods: In 27 consecutive patients referred for 223Ra-dichloride therapy additional 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was performed and tracer distribution was evaluated systematically with respect to the detection of visceral metastases and bone metastases with inadequate uptake on bone scintigraphy. Results: In 4 patients (15 %) 68Ga- PSMA-PET revealed previously unknown visceral metastases (3 liver, 1 adrenal gland), which changed the therapeutic decision in 2 cases. PET revealed more extended tumour involvement in the bone compared to bone scintigraphy in 9 patients (33 %). In 3 of these, the mismatch was extensive enough to question suitability for 223Ra-dichloride therapy. Conclusions: Additional 68Ga-PSMA-PET as a gatekeeper between conventional staging and 223Ra-dichloride therapy can provide valuable additional information with regard to visceral metastases and tumour manifestations without adequate bone mineral turnover. It may lead to a change in therapeutic management in a significant number of patients and should therefore be considered in future clinical trials.
Collapse
|
12
|
Guezennec C, Keromnes N, Robin P, Abgral R, Bourhis D, Querellou S, de Laroche R, Le Duc-Pennec A, Salaün PY, Le Roux PY. Incremental diagnostic utility of systematic double-bed SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy in initial staging of cancer patients. Cancer Imaging 2017; 17:16. [PMID: 28592305 PMCID: PMC5463363 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-017-0118-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background SPECT/CT has been shown to increase the diagnostic performance of bone scintigraphy for staging of malignancies. A systematic double-bed SPECT/CT of the trunk may allow further improvement. However, this would be balanced by higher dosimetry and longer acquisition time. The objective was to assess the incremental diagnostic utility of a systematic double-bed SPECT/CT acquisition for bone scintigraphy in initial staging of cancer patients, especially compared with the usual approach consisting in a whole body planar scan (WBS) plus one single-bed targeted SPECT/CT. Methods One hundred two consecutive patients referred for bone scintigraphy for initial staging of malignancy were analyzed. All patients underwent a double-bed SPECT/CT acquisition of the trunk. Images were interpreted by two nuclear medicine physicians in a 3-step procedure. Firstly, only WBS planar images were used; secondly, one additional single-bed SPECT/CT chosen based on planar images was used; finally, WBS planar and double-bed SPECT/CT images were interpreted. Lesions were classified as benign, equivocal or suspicious for metastasis. A per-lesion, per-anatomical region and per-patient analysis was performed. Results In a per-lesion analysis, the number of equivocal and suspicious lesions was 91 and 241 using WBS planar images, 17 and 259 using a single-bed SPECT/CT acquisition and 11 and 269 using double-bed SPECT/CT images, respectively. In a per-patient analysis, the diagnostic conclusion was negative, equivocal or suspicious for malignancy in 35, 53 and 14 patients using WB planar images, 77, 6 and 19 patients using an additional single-bed SPECT/CT and 76, 7 and 19 using double-bed SPECT/CT images, respectively. Seventeen lesions unseen on WBS images were interpreted as suspicious (n = 12) or equivocal (n = 5) on double-bed SPECT/CT images. Six lesions unseen on “WBS + targeted single-bed SPECT/CT” were interpreted as suspicious on double-bed SPECT/CT, with no shift in the metastatic status of patients. Conclusion A systematic double-bed SPECT/CT acquisition has a limited incremental diagnostic value over an oriented single-bed SPECT/CT in terms of specificity and conclusiveness of bone scintigraphy in the initial staging of cancer patients. However, it slightly improved the sensitivity of the test by detecting unseen lesions on WBS, which may be of value for initial staging of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Guezennec
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France.
| | - Nathalie Keromnes
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Philippe Robin
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Ronan Abgral
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - David Bourhis
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Solène Querellou
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Romain de Laroche
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | | | - Pierre-Yves Salaün
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Le Roux
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA3878 (GETBO) IFR 148, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Azad GK, Taylor B, Rubello D, Colletti PM, Goh V, Cook GJ. Molecular and Functional Imaging of Bone Metastases in Breast and Prostate Cancers: An Overview. Clin Nucl Med 2016; 41:e44-50. [PMID: 26402127 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000000993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Our ability to accurately assess the skeleton for metastases in breast and prostate cancers has improved significantly in recent years with hybrid imaging methods. Nevertheless, no consensus has been reached on the best imaging modality for diagnosis and treatment response assessment of skeletal disease. Hybrid SPECT/CT has low false-positive and false-negative rates compared with planar bone scintigraphy (BS) or BS augmented with SPECT in breast and prostate cancers. In breast cancer, 18F-FDG PET is more sensitive and accurate at detecting bone metastases than BS. Currently, little evidence has accrued to support the superiority of 18F-fluoride (18F-NaF) PET in diagnosing osseous metastases or monitoring treatment response in breast cancer when compared with conventional imaging. In prostate cancer, the sensitivities of 18F-NaF PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine (18F-choline), or 11C-choline PET/CT are equivalent, although 11C-/18F-choline PET/CT scans are more specific. Whole-body MRI, using anatomical sequences complemented by diffusion-weighted MRI, shows early evidence of utility for diagnosis and monitoring therapy response. We review the literature for staging and response assessment in metastatic breast and prostate cancer. While staging accuracy has significantly improved with hybrid imaging, optimal methods for assessing early treatment response have not been determined, and this is an area of active research.
Collapse
|
14
|
PSMA-Based Detection of Prostate Cancer Bone Lesions With ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT: A Sensitive Alternative to (⁹⁹m)Tc-MDP Bone Scan and Na¹⁸F PET/CT? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:e115-8. [PMID: 26603549 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
15
|
Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43:1503-13. [PMID: 24841276 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1903-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 246] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2013] [Revised: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 04/25/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Published data on the diagnosis of bone metastases of prostate cancer are conflicting and heterogeneous. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of choline-PET/CT, MRI, bone SPECT, and bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases in parents with prostate cancer. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated both on a per-patient basis and on a per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also drawn to obtain the area under curve (AUC) and Q* value. Sixteen articles consisting of 27 studies were included in the analysis. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivities by using choline PET/CT, MRI, and BS were 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.96], 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83), respectively. The pooled specificities for detection of bone metastases using choline PET/CT, MRI, and BS, were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00), 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), respectively. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivities of choline PET/CT, bone SPECT, and BS were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.55-0.63), respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for choline PET/CT, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90) for bone SPECT, and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) for BS. This meta-analysis indicated that MRI was better than choline PET/CT and BS on a per-patient basis. On a per-lesion analysis, choline PET/CT with the highest DOR and Q* was better than bone SPECT and BS for detecting bone metastases from prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
16
|
Current World Literature. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2012; 6:402-16. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0b013e3283573126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|