A model to facilitate implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health into prosthetics and orthotics

Leveraging Digital Workflows to Transition the Orthotics and Prosthetics Profession Toward a Client-Centric and Values-Based Care Model

The orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) profession has a history of responding to market demands in a reactive rather than proactive manner. This has created significant impacts including shrinkage in scope of practice and constraint in remuneration for professional services due to a fee-for-device third party payer system. Rapid changes in technology and healthcare combined with an outdated device-centric reimbursement system are creating unprecedented challenges that threaten sustainability of the O&P profession. Hence, a reassessment of the value of O&P care, and the O&P workflow process is necessary to inform an update to the value proposition and practice model for sustainability. This article reviews key factors contributing to the current state of O&P, and potential solutions involving an update in practitioner competencies, and the care delivery model (from device-centric to client-centric and values-based). Updates could be achieved by leveraging the use of digital workflows that increase efficiencies and enhance the value of clinical outcomes. Eventually, these updates could enable the O&P profession to elevate the value proposition that aligns with its most important stakeholders: client-patients and third-party reimbursement agencies in a rapidly changing technology and healthcare landscape.

Technology Management as a Core Component of a Client-centric Prosthetic Orthotic Practice Model

Technological innovation has transformed how we communicate, work, and conduct business. Over the next decade how we experience health care both as health care professionals and as client-patients will also change significantly. This presents both an opportunity and a challenge to medical clinical professionals that are device-focused, including prosthetists orthotists, as they consider how best to adapt. Current prosthetic orthotic education and practice is heavily clinically weighted, with less emphasis being given to engineering and business skills. Yet all three are essential core elements of a successful, sustainable prosthetics orthotics practice. Furthermore, it is the latter two that will heavily influence the future face of prosthetics & orthotics. It is not certain how current prosthetic orthotic practitioners can best adapt in response. One solution, proposed in this editorial, could be by rebalancing their professional persona to equally weight the three essential core elements. The result, a Clinical Prosthetic Orthotic Technology Management Professional, would engage in a professional practice that is functionally grounded, uses a client-centric model and incorporate eight professional attributes: professional, advocate, scholar, leader, communicator, collaborator, assistive technology expert and business justification specialist.

A toolkit for prosthetists and orthotists to facilitate progress in professional communication over the next 50 years

BACKGROUND

In this celebratory issue of Prosthetics and Orthotics International, we review professional communication skills in the field of prosthetics and orthotics.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to reflect on communication skills in the past 50 years, to discuss developments in the coming 50 years, and to create a toolkit and research agenda to facilitate progress in professional communication in the next 50 years.

RESULTS

Despite being a key area in prosthetics and orthotics training programmes, we found no studies on professional communication with an experimental design published in Prosthetics and Orthotics International. As an alternative, we provide clinical reflections on the changes in professional communication in the past 50 years, and we discuss questionnaire-based and qualitative studies that provide evidence for the importance of communication in pedorthic footwear provision. In the coming 50 years, professional communication in the field of prosthetics and orthotics may be impacted by aging populations, global mobility, information technology, technological advances and emphasis on prevention. We discuss each of these topics. To facilitate progress in professional communication, we have created a toolkit with resources for prosthetics and orthotics professionals, prosthetics and orthotics students and other interested professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

We hope this toolkit will inspire others to use, extend and implement it in their daily practice. As a research agenda, we strongly recommend undertaking research on interventions to improve professional communication and to study its effect on clinically meaningful outcomes.

Education in prosthetic and orthotic training: Looking back 50 years and moving forward

There is a long history of prosthetic and orthotic services helping to mitigate the impact of physical impairment by restoring function, and enabling and equipping the user. The training of health professionals who design, fit, and maintain prosthetic and orthotic devices has evolved over the centuries, reflecting an increase in knowledge, technology, understanding, and social attitudes in each era. Improvements in pedagogical thinking and biomechanical understanding, as well as the advent of new integrated technologies, have driven the profession over the past 50 years to modernize, evolve training and service delivery models in line with new attitudes toward clients, and search for new ways to improve users' quality of life. In this narrative review, the authors examined the evolution of prosthetic and orthotic education, the impact of changing educational techniques and technologies, and the impact of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics in that process. Through conversations with experts and review of peer-reviewed literature, accreditation documents, and the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics records and databases, the authors identified three areas of change in prosthetics and orthotics education over the past 50 years: (1) prosthetic/orthotic curriculum content, (2) pedagogy and course delivery, and (3) internships/residencies. This narrative review is a snapshot of a growing profession and we can only speculate where the next 50 years will lead us as we strive to serve patients, ever placing their needs and aspirations at the center of this professional service.

"A way to think of the client holistically": Factors influencing speech-language pathology students' ICF regard and uptake

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Adoption of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) may facilitate holistic delivery of health and social care and improve interprofessional practice, however there is limited uptake across the spectrum of health professions, including speech-language pathology (SLP). Improved commitment will partially depend on student education, yet related educational research is scant. Method In order to inform teaching, learning and future research practices, this exploratory mixed methods investigation surveyed 101 student speech-language pathologists to describe how the ICF is regarded and used, and factors contributing to its acceptance. Results As with their professional colleagues, SLP student uptake of the ICF was limited. Those who used the ICF applied the framework and terminology alone, rather than its classification, coding or core set features, for client-centred rather than management tasks. Similarly, students appreciated the ICF for its ability to foster holistic practice, rather than its capacity to enhance workplace communication, a key factor in interprofessional practice. Statistical analysis of responses to scaled survey questions revealed the most valued learning experiences, especially case studies, lectures, ICF application in university assignments and on placement. Survey responses were significantly influenced by two factors: number of student placements and whether or not students had only a paediatric placement. Thematic analysis of open responses revealed two principal and one secondary theme: "ICF framework as a way of thinking"; "experiential learning optimises application of the ICF"; and "rudimentary understanding restricts ICF uptake". Discussion Findings are discussed in relation to a proposed Transition from Theory to Practice model. Explicit integration of a biopsychosocial approach to practice across the curriculum should result in deeper understanding of the ICF, increased ability to apply it to interprofessional practice and, importantly, a greater sense of agency to effect change.

A conceptual framework for orthotic and prosthetic education

BACKGROUND

Variables that influence orthotic and prosthetic patient outcomes beyond direct care are poorly conceptualized for orthotic and prosthetic students. Restructuring educational curricula around important clinical reasoning variables (i.e. factors that may influence outcomes) could improve teaching, learning, and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To propose an orthotic and prosthetic education framework to enhance the development of orthotic and prosthetic students' clinical reasoning skills.

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review, identified variables of orthotic and prosthetic usability, and performed a qualitative thematic analysis through the lens of orthotic and prosthetic clinical educators to develop a conceptual framework for orthotic and prosthetic education.

RESULTS

Sorting of variables identified from the literature resulted in three thematic areas: (1) the state of functioning, disability, and health (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health); (2) orthotic and prosthetic technical properties, procedures, and appropriateness; and (3) professional service as part of orthotic and prosthetic interventions. The proposed orthotic and prosthetic education framework includes these three areas situated within the context of patient-centered care.

CONCLUSIONS

A conceptual framework was developed from variables identified in peer-reviewed literature. This orthotic and prosthetic education framework provides a structure to explore orthotic and prosthetic clinical reasoning and advance our teaching and assessment of students' clinical reasoning skills.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The proposed orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) education framework is intended to promote conversation about variables (e.g. health condition, procedures, services, and O&P principles) that influence O&P clinical practice outcomes and further advance our teaching and assessment of students' clinical reasoning skills.