Latex hypersensitivity in spinal cord injured adult patients

Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: diagnostic approach

Correct management of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia requires a multidisciplinary approach with prompt recognition and treatment of the acute event by the attending anaesthesiologist, and subsequent determination of the responsible agent(s) with strict avoidance of subsequent administration of all incriminated and/or cross-reacting compounds. However, correct identification of the causative compound(s) and safe alternatives is not always straightforward and, too often, not done. This review is not intended to discuss acute management of anaesthesia-related anaphylaxis but summarizes the major causes of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia and the diagnostic approach of this rare but potentially life-threatening complication. Apart from general principles about the diagnostic approach, history taking and importance of tryptase quantification, more specific confirmatory diagnostic procedures are organized on the basis of the major causes of perioperative anaphylactic reactions.

Sublingual desensitization in children with congenital malformations and latex allergy

The frequency of latex allergy in children requiring multiple surgery ranges from 16.7% to 65%. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of latex desensitization in a group of 10 patients with a history of multiple surgical procedures and clinically manifested allergy to latex. We selected 10 children (female-male ratio = 5:5), aged 4-16 yr (mean +/- s.d.: 9 +/- 4), with a history of multiple surgical procedures, adverse reactions to latex and positive skin test to latex and/or specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Latex allergy diagnosis was confirmed by specific provocation tests (cutaneous, sublingual, mucous, conjunctival tests). Rush (4-day) sublingual desensitization was performed with increasing doses of latex extract (ALK Abellò) under patients' tongue until the highest dose of 500 microg of latex. A maintenance therapy (10 drops of undiluted solution three times a week) was recommended. During the 2-yr follow-up mean values of specific IgG4 and IgE, eosinophilic cationic protein and total IgE did not show significant variations. Patients did not manifest any adverse effect during the rush phase and only two patients manifested mild local symptoms during the maintenance therapy. All the challenges showed a reduction in terms of percentage of positivity and mean scores. All the patients showed a reduction of the mean individual score (p < 0.001). Furthermore patients who needed dental examination or surgery underwent such procedures without the occurrence of symptoms. Our preliminary results show sublingual desensitization to latex can be an important therapeutic tool in the management of young allergic patients requiring multiple operations.

Latex allergy in children with urological malformation and chronic renal failure

PURPOSE

Children with spina bifida, bladder exstrophy and anorectal anomalies are at risk for latex allergy. Severe intraoperative anaphylaxis in a boy treated with kidney transplantation prompted this study to evaluate the prevalence of latex allergy in a cohort of children with chronic renal failure (CRF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2002, 57 boys and 28 girls were investigated at a median age of 10.5 years (range 1.3 to 22.9). Urological malformations were the underlying cause of CRF in 33 patients (39%). Of the patients 39 were on conservative treatment, 20 were on dialysis and 26 had a functioning renal graft. Latex reaction was assessed by a careful history, specific serum latex IgE and skin prick test.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients (22%) showed latex reaction, of whom 8 had allergy (clinical symptoms included severe intraoperative anaphylaxis in 1) and 11 had sensitivity (positive IgE or prick test without symptoms). Of these 19 patients 11 had urological malformations. The number of surgical procedures, young age at operation and atopy were significant risk factors. When operations were analyzed separately, ie urological vs nonurological surgery, only urological surgery was significantly associated with latex reaction. A significant correlation was also found between the overall number of operations and latex radioallergosorbent class.

CONCLUSIONS

All children with CRF who undergo early and multiple urological surgery are at high risk for latex reaction. Primary latex prevention, ie the routine use of latex-free gloves, tubes and catheters, should be implemented in all children with complex urological malformations.

Outcome of a latex avoidance program in a high-risk population for latex allergy - a five-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Children with a shunted hydrocephalus are at highest risk for developing an immediate type allergy to latex. Limited data are available for preventive or therapeutical approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of latex avoidance, with special regard to status of sensitization and compliance.

METHODS

In 1995, 131 children with a shunted hydrocephalus were screened for sensitization to latex by skin prick test and determination of specific IgE. Patients and parents were instructed on latex-avoiding strategies. Hospital physicians, family doctors and dentists were advised to perform further surgical and other medical interventions under latex-free conditions. In 2000, 100 of these 131 patients were re-evaluated according to the same testing procedures. Special attention was directed at the extent prophylaxis had been performed.

RESULTS

In 1995, 30/100 patients re-evaluable in 2000 proved sensitized to latex, 70 had negative testing results. In 2000, 64/70 patients were still negative, six had meanwhile developed latex-specific IgE. Seven out of thirty subjects with former positive testing had changes within the same RAST-class, 20 showed a decline of at least one RAST-class, whereas in three cases an increase of latex-specific IgE was found. However, only 34 patients, mainly those being already sensitized, had thoroughly followed both medical and private prophylaxis. Within this group, 16 subjects (47.1%) had improved and another nine (26.5%) were still negative. Only three (8.8%) already previously sensitized patients presented with a further increase of latex-specific IgE. Medical prevention contributed more to the outcome than home prevention. No statistically significant correlation with latex-avoidance was observed, however, in previously unsensitized subjects. Underlying disease, atopy, number of operations, and age did not prove as significant variables.

CONCLUSION

Secondary prevention results in a decrease of specific IgE in latex-sensitized patients with hydrocephalus. This is due to medical more than home prophylaxis. Sensitization obviously occurs mainly in early childhood, thus primary prevention remains to be the main target.