Risk factors for epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation

An Alternative Airway Intervention to Preserve the Surgical Field in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Background/need. Office-based sedation has become increasingly commonplace in dental offices in recent years, allowing for practitioners to provide broader scope of care for their patients. Maintaining high standards of safety is of utmost importance when sedation is utilized in the office-based setting, especially for patients deemed at a higher-risk for intraoperative airway obstruction. This demographic includes but is not limited to individuals with a medical history significant for obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and morbid obesity. Presently, a wide variety of airway devices exist for use in the event of airway obstruction. However, in the context of oral and maxillofacial surgery, placement of these devices can encroach upon the surgical field, extending the perioperative period and putting the patient at greater long-term risk for maintaining adequate oxygenation. Methodology. The authors describe a preliminary technique trialed in our offices which utilizes a size 5.0 endotracheal tube (5OET) as an adjunct supraglottic airway to help mitigate the issue of oxygen saturation maintenance, as well as unimpeded access to the oral cavity. Implementation of the device requires identifying appropriate candidates during preoperative screening and placing the device through the nare and securing it above the glottis. Device Description. The 'tube kit' is comprised of a standard size straight 5.0 cuffed oral ETT, a 5-mL syringe for inflation of the cuff post insertion, lubricant, flex extension tubing, end tidal sampling line for capnography, tape for securement of the 5OET, and an anesthesia breathing circuit. Optional equipment pieces include an elbow connecter and a foam piece for comfort. Results/Current Status. Preliminary results have demonstrated oxygen saturations maintained above 98% when the 5OET is placed preoperatively. Continued use of the trial device will inform the development of a tube by our clinicians, and its efficacy will be studied in our offices. The next steps will be to start developing a pilot cuff that will be submitted for patent approval after its use in IRB-approved clinical studies.

Using of panoramic and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs to identify the optimal nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation

Background and Aim

Selecting the optimum nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation is quite important in the maxillofacial surgeries for the success of intubation and the reduction of potential complications such as nasal mucosal laceration, epistaxis, avulsion of the inferior and middle turbinates, and septal laceration.

Materials and Methods

The present study evaluates standard panoramic radiographs (PR) and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs (PACR) to determine the optimal nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation and compares the results with those of routine anesthesiological occlusion and spatula tests (ST). The results of occlusion tests (OT), ST, and radiological assessments of 60 patients prior to nasotracheal intubation were compared with the nasal endoscopic assessment results, and complications were evaluated.

Results

There was no significant association between the OT and nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.075). A significant association was found between the ST and nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.000), and between the radiological assessments and the nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.000). Compatibility with nasal endoscopy was 54% when the occlusion and ST were evaluated together, 75% when the OT and radiological assessments were evaluated together, and 86% when the ST and radiological assessments were evaluated together. The highest level of compatibility was 92% when all the tests were evaluated together.

Conclusion

The simple tests alone were found to be inadequate for the selection of the optimal nasal passage. Evaluation of PR and PACR, which are commonly used in maxillofacial surgeries, together with simple anesthesiological examination tests would increase nasotracheal intubation success and decrease complications.

For nasotracheal intubation, which nostril results in less epistaxis: right or left?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nasotracheal intubation is usually required in patients undergoing oromaxillofacial, otolaryngological or plastic surgery to prevent the airway encroaching into the operating field. Epistaxis is the most common complication, but which nostril is associated with a lower incidence and severity of epistaxis is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

When both nostrils are patent, to determine the preferred nostril for nasotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the incidence of epistaxis and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe epistaxis, the time required to pass the tube through the nasal passage and total intubation time.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to 1 March 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The only studies included were RCTs comparing epistaxis related to nasotracheal intubation via right or left nostril, in adult surgery patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs with 1658 patients were included. Compared with the left nostril, intubation via the right nostril was associated with a significantly lower incidence of epistaxis: risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 0.78 (0.62 to 0.99), P = 0.04: a lower incidence of severe epistaxis (five studies, n=923), RR 0.40 (0.22 to 0.75), P = 0.004: and a shorter intubation time (three studies, n=345), mean difference -7.28 (-14.40 to -0.16) seconds, P = 0.05. In two studies (n=310), no significant difference between the right and left nostril was observed in the time to pass the tube through the nasal passages, mean difference -0.59 (-1.95 to 0.77) s, P = 0.40.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the current available evidence, when both nostrils are patent, the right nostril is more appropriate for nasotracheal intubation, with a lower incidence and severity of epistaxis and faster intubation time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020169949).

Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal Airway to Facilitate Nasotracheal Intubation

Background and Aims:

Nasotracheal intubation is the most common method of airway management in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients. However, many times, it is associated with bleeding resulting from trauma to nasopharyngeal mucosa. We conducted this study to determine the effectiveness of nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) to easily facilitate the nasopharyngeal insertion and to reduce the trauma during nasotracheal intubation.

Methods:

A total of 120 patients scheduled for elective oral and maxillofacial surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation were randomly divided into two groups of 60 each, after preparation with xylometazoline drops intranasally, lubrication with lignocaine jelly, and thermosoftening of the tip of the endotracheal tube (ETT). In group NPA, dilatation of the nasal cavity was done with NPA before nasotracheal intubation and in Group C, nasotracheal intubation was done without dilatation of the nasal cavity. The smoothness of insertion of ETT was graded on a 4‑point rating scale. Assessment of bleeding into nasopharynx was confirmed during laryngoscopy and was also graded with 4‑point scale.

Results:

In the NPA group, all the 60 (100%) patients had smooth or relatively smooth (Grade 0 or 1) insertion compared to 51 (85%) patients in the control group (P < 0.0001). Eighteen (30%) patients had mild (Grade 1) bleeding and one (1.67%) patient had moderate bleeding (Grade 2) in the control group, whereas only four (6.67%) patients in the NPA group had mild (Grade 1) bleeding (P = 0.0005).

Conclusion:

Dilatation of nasal cavity with NPA significantly eases the insertion of ETT into the nasopharynx and also significantly decreases the incidence and severity of trauma and bleeding during nasotracheal intubation.

Is Tube Thermosoftening Helpful for Videolaryngoscope-Guided Nasotracheal Intubation?: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Thermosoftening of the endotracheal tube (ETT) and telescoping the ETT into a rubber catheter have been suggested as a method for reducing epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation (NTI). However, thermosoftening technique is known to make it difficult to navigate the ETT into trachea without the use of Magill forceps during NTI. The cuff inflation technique has been suggested as an effective alternative to the use of Magill forceps to improve the oropharyngeal navigation of the ETT, irrespective of their stiffness, during direct laryngoscope-guided NTI. We evaluated whether thermosoftening of the ETT telescoped into rubber catheters has an additional benefit in reducing nasal injury. Simultaneously, we also evaluated whether thermosoftening of the ETT worsened orotracheal navigability during cuff inflation-supplemented videolaryngoscope-guided NTI.

METHODS

One hundred forty patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups depending on whether the ETT was softened by warming or not. The primary outcome was the incidence of epistaxis during NTI. The secondary outcome was nasotracheal navigability of the ETT, assessed by navigation grade and time required for insertion of ETT in each phase (from nose to oropharynx, from oropharynx to glottic inlet aided by cuff inflation if needed, and from glottic inlet to trachea).

RESULTS

The ETTs were successfully inserted through the selected nostril of all 140 patients. In the thermosoftening group, the incidence and severity of epistaxis was significantly lower (7% vs 51%; difference of 44.2%; 95% confidence interval, 29.9%-56.2%; P < .001), and the ETT passed through the nasal cavity with lower resistance (P = .001) and less time (P < .001) when compared to the control group. No difference was found in the ease of ETT insertion (navigation grade and time required) from the oropharynx to the glottic inlet (P > .99 and P = .054, respectively) and from the glottic inlet to the trachea (P > .99 and P = .750, respectively) between the 2 groups. In both groups, all ETTs could be navigated into the trachea without the use of Magill forceps.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplemented with cuff inflation during videolaryngoscope-guided NTI, thermosoftening of the ETT telescoped into rubber catheters has a substantial benefit because it significantly reduces the incidence of epistaxis without worsening the oropharyngeal navigability of the ETT.

Insertion depth of nasotracheal tubes sized to fit the nostril: an observational study

Objective

Nasotracheal (NT) intubation is commonly applied during head and neck surgery. However, improper tube size and depth may cause complications. In the current study, we investigated whether NT tubes are being appropriately used in terms of size and depth in adult patients.

Methods

Nares were sized in 40 patients using standard nasopharyngeal airways (6.0–8.0) before elective surgery under general anesthesia. The largest sized airway that passed easily into the nasopharynx without resistance was considered as a proper size. Using a fiberoptic scope, the distances from the nares to the vocal cords and the nares to the carina were measured. Rates of proper NT tube positioning were calculated with regard to the cuff and distal tip.

Results

The most frequent sizes of properly fitted NT tubes were 6.5 and 6.0 in male and female patients, respectively. Positioning of the cuff and distal tip was only appropriate when using a properly sized tube in 26% and 47% of male and female patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Care should be taken to determine the insertion depth after placing an NT tube that has been sized to fit the nostril. Moreover, NT tubes of the same diameter may be required in various lengths.

Trial registration: Registered at ClinicalTrial.gov; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02876913; Registration number NCT02876913

Otolaryngology in Critical Care

Diseases affecting the ear, nose, and throat are prevalent in intensive care settings and often require combined medical and surgical management. Upper airway occlusion can occur as a result of malignant tumor growth, allergic reactions, and bleeding events and may require close monitoring and interventions by intensivists, sometimes necessitating surgical management. With the increased prevalence of immunocompromised patients, aggressive infections of the head and neck likewise require prompt recognition and treatment. In addition, procedure-specific complications of major otolaryngologic procedures can be highly morbid, necessitating vigilant postoperative monitoring. For optimal outcomes, intensivists need a broad understanding of the pathophysiology and management of life-threatening otolaryngologic disease.

Airway support using a pediatric intubation tube in adult patients with atrial fibrillation: A simple and unique method to prevent heart movement during catheter ablation under continuous deep sedation

Background

The present study aimed to elucidate the safety and effectiveness of a noble and unique airway management technique in which a pediatric intubation tube is used in adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter ablation (CA) under continuous deep sedation.

Methods

In total, 246 consecutive patients with AF (mean age, 65±10 years; 60 women) underwent CA under dexmedetomidine-based continuous deep sedation. A 4-mm pediatric intubation tube guided by a 10-French intratracheal suction tube was inserted smoothly, and the tip of the tube was located at the base of the epiglottis. The maximum shifting distance of the heart (MSDH) was measured with the 3D mapping system (Ensite NavX system) before and after inserting the pediatric intubation tube.

Results

At baseline, the MSDH of patients under continuous deep sedation was 23±14 mm. The pediatric intubation tube reduced the MSDH to 13±6 mm (mean reduction from baseline, 38.4±21.7%; P<0.0001). In contrast, oxygen saturation was significantly increased from 89±8% to 95±3% (P<0.0001). The mean distance between the nostril and base of the epiglottis was 16.6±0.5 mm. Major periprocedural complications occurred in 9 (3.6%) patients including 3 (1.2%) cardiac tamponade and 6 (2.4%) phrenic nerve injury cases. Larger MSDH (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.25; P=0.007) was a significant predictor of major periprocedural complications. No major airway complications occurred, except in 3 patients (1.2%) who had minor nasal bleeding.

Conclusion

This unique airway management technique using a pediatric intubation tube for CA procedures performed in adult patients with AF under continuous deep sedation was easy, safe, and effective.

Comparison of 4% and 6% topical cocaine solutions for reduction of epistaxis induced by nasotracheal intubation

BACKGROUND

Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) provides a good field for surgeons in patients undergoing oromaxillofacial surgery; however, NTI is often complicated by epistaxis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 4% and 6% topical cocaine solutions in reducing epistaxis during NTI.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients (16-65 years old) undergoing oromaxillofacial surgery were randomly assigned to two groups treated with either 4% cocaine (n = 39) or 6% cocaine (n = 40). Topical cocaine (1 mL) was sprayed onto the selected nasal cavity prior to NTI. All intubations were performed by an expert anesthesiologist using a GlideScope. The incidence and severity of epistaxis was examined along the nasal cavity up to the nasopharynx using a fiber optic bronchoscope. The hemodynamic responses to stimuli during the peri-NTI period were also recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of epistaxis was 43.59% (17/39) in the 4% cocaine group and 50% (20/40) in the 6% cocaine group (p = 0.57). The severity of epistaxis did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.46). High resistance during NTI and epistaxis were closely correlated and the major bleeding sites were located at the nasopharynx. Compared with the 4% cocaine group, treatment with 6% cocaine resulted in a higher heart rate and mean arterial pressure (both p < 0.05). There was no statistically significance difference between the two groups with respect to the hemodynamic responses to NTI.

CONCLUSION

The spraying of either 4% or 6% topical cocaine into the nasal cavity gives comparable effects for intubation-related epistaxis. However, 6% cocaine may increase the hemodynamic responses while being sprayed. Therefore spraying with 4% topical cocaine had advantages with respect to 6% cocaine and is recommended for use prior to NTI.

Case report: nasotracheal intubation--look before leaping to assess the laryngeal view

PURPOSE

To describe an airway management plan, including oral to nasal endotracheal tube exchange, when nasal intubation is required in the unanticipated difficult airway.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A nasal intubation was required for a patient undergoing oropharyngeal surgery. Following loss of consciousness and paralysis, a Cormack-Lehane class 3 view was obtained, and pressure over the thyroid cartilage failed to reveal the vocal cords. An Eschmann bougie was inserted into the oropharynx and blindly entered the trachea. An orotracheal tube was advanced into the trachea over the bougie, and the patient was ventilated with 100% O2 following the bougie's removal. An endotracheal tube was then guided through the right nostril into the hypopharynx. An Eschmann bougie was inserted into the nasal tube, and advanced towards the glottic opening under laryngoscopic view. Digital pressure applied to the oral tube at the base of the tongue brought the vocal cords into view. The oral endotracheal cuff was deflated, and the bougie (inserted into the nasal tube) was advanced into the trachea alongside the orotracheal tube. The orotracheal tube was withdrawn, and the nasal tube was advanced into the trachea over the bougie. The patient's O2 saturation and end-tidal CO2 concentration remained at 99-100% and 30-33 mmHg, respectively, during these maneuvers, which required only a few minutes to perform.

CONCLUSION

When nasotracheal intubation is required, a plan of airway management is required to safely secure the airway. We emphasize the importance of direct laryngoscopy prior to insertion of an endotracheal tube through the nose, and describe a strategy for oral to nasal tracheal tube exchange.

Nasotracheal intubation under curve-tipped suction catheter guidance reduces epistaxis

BACKGROUND

Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) has greater potential for trauma of nasopharyngeal mucosa than orotracheal intubation. The present study investigated the success rate of NTI and frequency of nasal bleeding using a curve-tipped suction catheter (CTSC) to guide nasotracheal tube advancement.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 131 adult patients who under-went NTI. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups: a) NTI under CTSC guidance (G[+] group). The CTSC (14 Fr) was first inserted through the tracheal tube, with the tip of the CTSC emerging from the distal end of the tube. The curved tip was directed ventrally. Both tracheal tube and CTSC were advanced together through the nasopharynx; b) NTI without CTSC guidance (G[-] group). The tracheal tube was advanced into the nasal cavity and passed into the pharynx without CTSC guidance. The time required to pass the endotracheal tube through the nasal cavity (nasal passage time), success rate of nasal passage with nasotracheal tube, and the incidence and severity of nasal bleeding were compared.

RESULTS

Success rate for nasal passage was 100% in the G(+) group (62/62) and 82.6% in the G(-) group (57/69; P = 0.0006). Frequency of nasal bleeding was significantly lower in the G(+) group (21/62, 33.9%) than in the G(-) group (37/69, 53.6%; P = 0.023). Severity of nasal bleeding was also significantly lower in the G(+) group than in the G(-) group (P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasotracheal intubation under CTSC guidance increases the success rate of airway instrumentation, and also reduces the incidence and severity of epistaxis.