Anaesthesia priorities for Australian and New Zealand medical school curricula: a Delphi consensus of academic anaesthetists

A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective of the Undergraduate Anesthesia Curricula in South Africa

BACKGROUND

Safe anesthesia is indispensable to achieve global safe surgery and equitable health care access. The disease burden and lack of specialists in South Africa (SA) require junior, nonspecialist doctors to be fit-for-purpose from day 1 when they provide anesthetic services in peripheral hospitals with limited supervision. Graduating students report low self-perceived preparedness for administering anesthesia, but it is not known how their curricular experiences influence their learning. Cognitive load theory defines intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive loads (subtypes). Intrinsic load relates to learning tasks, extraneous load to distractions, and germane load to students' learning processes. This study used a cognitive load theory lens to explore SA students' experiences of their undergraduate anesthesia training.

METHODS

In a constructivist cross-sectional descriptive study, we explored the qualitative factors that influenced students' curricular experience of undergraduate anesthesia training in SA. Two investigators analyzed the data independently in an initial coding round. An emerging theme of lack of time to achieve the expected outcomes, prompted the use of cognitive load theory as a conceptual framework for further analysis by the 3 authors. The subsequent analysis informed the development and refinement of a final cognitive load theory framework for anesthesia training, the COLOAD (COgnitive LOad in Anesthesia eDucation) framework.

RESULTS

Data were collected between November 2017 and February 2019. The 1336 respondents (79% participation) reported a variety of determinants of learning pertaining to all 3 cognitive load subtypes. Participants were novices in an inherently complex environment and experienced a high cognitive load during anesthesia training. The number-, complexity-, and interactivity of tasks influenced intrinsic load, while extraneous load was affected by ineffective instructional methods, external- and internal distractors. Program design, metacognition, and learner motivation impacted germane load.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive load theory provided a useful theoretical basis for understanding students' curricular experiences. The COLOAD framework suggests a microlevel interrelatedness of the constituting elements of the 3 cognitive load subtypes. This has implications for curriculum design, pedagogy, and student support. Learning outcomes development and curriculum mapping are important to ensure a lean curriculum, but measures to enhance germane cognitive load might be equally important to achieve competence. Attention to the hidden curriculum and active promotion of reflective practice might reduce cognitive load in complex learning environments such as anesthesia training.

Undergraduate Anesthesia Skills for a Global Surgery Agenda: Students' Self-Reported Competence

BACKGROUND

Safe anesthesia is imperative for the Global Surgery agenda and Sustainable Development Goal 3. Due to a shortage of specialists in South Africa (SA), anesthetic services are often provided by nonspecialist doctors, often newly qualified and frequently without immediate supervision. The burden of disease in the developing world demands fit-for-purpose, day-one medical graduates. Although undergraduate anesthesia training is mandatory for medical students in SA, no outcomes are specified, and these are decided autonomously at each medical school. This study describes the current self-perceived anesthetic competence of medical students in SA as a needs assessment directed at achieving the goals of Global Surgery in SA and other developing countries.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional observational study, 1689 students (89% participation rate), representing all medical schools in SA, rated their self-perceived competence at graduation in 54 anesthetic-related Likert scale items in 5 themes: patient evaluation, patient preparation for anesthesia, practical skills performance, administration of anesthesia, and the management of intraoperative complications. Medical schools were divided into clusters A (≥25 days of anesthetic training) and B (<25 days). Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, and a mixed-effects regression model were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Students felt more prepared for history-taking and patient examination than for managing emergencies and complications. The self-perceived competence of students at cluster A schools was higher across all 54 items and all 5 themes. The same was observed for general medical skills and skills relating to maternal mortality in SA.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-on-task, capacity for repetition, and student maturity might have impacted self-efficacy and should be considered in curriculum development. Students felt less prepared for emergencies. Focused training and assessment aimed at emergency management should be considered. Students did not feel competent in general medical areas, in which anesthetists are experts, including resuscitation, fluid management, and analgesia. Anesthetists should take ownership of this training at the undergraduate level. Cesarean delivery is the most performed surgical procedure in sub-Saharan Africa. The Essential Steps in Managing Obstetric Emergencies (ESMOE) program was designed for internship training but can be introduced at undergraduate level. This study suggests that curriculum reform is required. The achievement of an agreed-upon set of standardized national undergraduate anesthetic competencies may ensure fit-for-purpose practitioners. Undergraduate and internship training should align to form part of a continuum of basic anesthetics training in SA. The findings of this study might benefit curriculum development in other regions with similar contexts.

Competency-based undergraduate curriculum implementation in anesthesiology-A survey-based comparison of two models of training

Background and Aim:

Imparting the knowledge and skills of Anesthesiology to undergraduates can be challenging. Competency Based Undergraduate (CBUG) Curriculum for the Undergraduate medical students introduced by the Medical Council of India (MCI) aims to improve the quality of the Indian Medical Graduate (IMG). The Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care of our college redrafted the training program and brought it in-line with the CBUG Curriculum beginning February 2019. A questionnaire based survey was conducted to assess the efficacy, satisfaction levels and the perception of the students towards the new competency based curriculum. The aim was to assess the students perception of the competency based curriculum and to evaluate two slightly different approaches to the implementation of the curriculum.

Material and Methods:

Two groups of undergraduate medical students belonging to the 6^th and 8^th term, underwent two different models of teaching. The 8^th term students had already completed their theory classes based on the older curriculum a year ago when they were in 6^th term. However, their clinics and tutorials were modelled as per the new CBUG Curriculum. The current 6^th term students had their first exposure to Anesthesiology and their theory, tutorials and clinics were scheduled in the same term, simulation based training was added, the operation theatre rotation was held in the mornings at 0730hrs and the intensive care unit rounds were held in the evenings. There was no difference in the theory classes taken for the two batches, however the clinics were different. After both the batches finished their rotation, they were given the survey questionnaire to assess their perception of the model of CBUG Curriculum that they were exposed to.

Results:

The results of the survey revealed that about 80% of the students in both groups preferred that theory classes and practical training should be conducted in parallel in 6^th term. About 60% students in both groups felt that early morning clinics 0800hrs were better than mid-morning clinics at 1100hrs as they get to see and do more procedures. 66%-82% students in both groups felt that the practical training in the OT, ICU and skills lab were very helpful or extremely helpful. The most important aspect of Anesthesiology rotation was “learning basic life saving skills and simulation based learning“ according to 85% students in both groups. Nearly 80% students in both groups felt that the training in Anesthesiology should be allotted more time and more weightage in undergraduate training. 72% students in 6^th term and 63% students in 8^th term felt more confident of handling emergencies after their Anesthesiology rotation.

Conclusion:

The new curriculum was extremely well received by the students of both groups. The model used for 6^th term students comprising of teaching theory and practical in the same term and having early morning clinics, was found to be superior as compared to the model used to teach 8^th term students where there was a gap of one year between theory and practical teaching and the clinics were held midmorning.

Undergraduate education in anaesthesia, intensive care, pain, and perioperative medicine: The development of a national curriculum framework

INTRODUCTION

The study describes the development of the first UK national framework to guide undergraduate education in anesthesia, perioperative medicine, critical care, and pain medicine.

METHODS

We followed an inclusive process of curriculum design aiming to promote high-level learning amongst students. We conducted telephone interviews with senior anesthetic educators at 33 UK medical schools to establish current provision and practice. We then held a consultative national workshop for educators, using focus group interviews to set broad aims for the final framework and gather information.

RESULT

Anesthesia undergraduate educators demonstrated a conceptual focus that moves beyond simple acquisition of knowledge to one geared to encouraging clinical behavioral change in learners to equip them for practice as new doctors. Respondents also highlighted the opportunities for promoting spiral, integrated, and longitudinal learning within the undergraduate curriculum. We also formulated eight key domains of practice in anesthesia and critical care and mapped 63 of the 106 General Medical Council's Outcomes for Graduates against these domains, and created a brief suggested syllabus.

CONCLUSIONS

The framework aims to provide support and guidance for medical schools in the development of competent, well-rounded doctors who are able to provide safe, patient-centered care in all areas of medical practice.

Pain medicine content, teaching and assessment in medical school curricula in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

The objective of pain medicine education is to provide medical students with opportunities to develop their knowledge, skills and professional attitudes that will lead to their becoming safe, capable, and compassionate medical practitioners who are able to meet the healthcare needs of persons in pain. This study was undertaken to identify and describe the delivery of pain medicine education at medical schools in Australia and New Zealand.

METHOD

All 23 medical schools in Australia and New Zealand in 2016 were included in this study. A structured curriculum audit tool was used to obtain information on pain medicine curricula including content, delivery, teaching and assessment methods.

RESULTS

Nineteen medical schools (83%) completed the curriculum audit. Neurophysiology, clinical assessment, analgesia use and multidimensional aspects of pain medicine were covered by most medical schools. Specific learning objectives for pain medicine were not identified by 42% of medical schools. One medical school offered a dedicated pain medicine module delivered over 1 week. Pain medicine teaching was delivered at all schools by a number of different departments throughout the curriculum. Interprofessional learning (IPL) in the context of pain medicine education was not specified by any of the medical schools. The mean time allocated for pain medicine teaching over the entire medical course was just under 20 h. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was used by 32% of schools to assess knowledge and skills in pain medicine. 16% of schools were unsure of whether any assessment of pain medicine education took place.

CONCLUSION

This descriptive study provides important baseline information for pain medicine education at medical schools in Australia and New Zealand. Medical schools do not have well-documented or comprehensive pain curricula that are delivered and assessed using pedagogically-sound approaches considering the complexity of the topic, the prevalence and public health burden of pain.

Teaching and learning in undergraduate anaesthesia: a quantitative and qualitative analysis of practice at the University of Auckland

Anaesthesia encompasses a broad range of knowledge and skills of relevance to graduating doctors. For the majority of new doctors, an undergraduate clinical rotation is their only exposure to anaesthesia practice. However, the content and approach to undergraduate anaesthesia education varies between institutions. We explored our students' views and experiences, and teaching approaches and expectations of consultant anaesthetists during a clinical attachment in anaesthesia. Our mixed-method design included student and staff surveys, logbook analysis and student focus groups. Logbook analysis of all 202 students showed mean numbers of attempts for bag-mask ventilation, laryngeal mask insertion, tracheal intubation and IV cannulation were 6.8, 3.9, 3.3 and 4.5, respectively. Focus group responses (11 students, three groups) suggested a mismatch between students' expectations of performing clinical skills and the available opportunities, particularly for IV cannulation. Students often felt reluctant to ask anaesthetists to teach them, and appreciated clinician-led engagement in all aspects of learning patient management. Among the 78 anaesthetists (29.3%) responding to the survey, the five tasks most frequently identified as suitable for teaching to students all related to airway management. Our study found much unanticipated variability in student exposure, teaching practice and attitudes to teaching various skills or procedures between anaesthetists, and student opinion of their clinical attachment. The findings resulted in a review of many aspects of the attachment. It is likely that other institutions will have similar variability and we recommend they undertake similar exercises to optimise teaching and learning opportunities for undergraduate anaesthesia.