Triptans and serious adverse vascular events: data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database

Relative frequency, characteristics, and disease burden of patients with migraine unsuitable for triptan treatment: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

This review was conducted to systematically identify evidence characterizing patients with migraine who are unsuitable for triptans.

BACKGROUND

Triptans are not suitable as first-line treatment for all patients with migraine due to contraindications, lack of efficacy, and/or poor tolerability. However, there is debate about the frequency and characteristics of these patients and the burden they experience.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and conference abstracts (2011-2022) were reviewed for evidence on patients with migraine unsuitable for triptans for any reason. Data from publications describing the frequency and characteristics of this group, as well as the clinical, humanistic, or economic burden of disease in this population, were extracted.

RESULTS

Of 1460 records screened, 29 publications met inclusion criteria. Persistence with triptans was low; 51%-66% of patients starting a new triptan did not refill it, and 43%-100% discontinued their initial triptan over 2 years. In one study, 14% of patients with migraine reported prior discontinuation/failure of ≥ 2 triptans due to inadequate efficacy or poor tolerability. Up to 15% of patients with migraine had triptan contraindications, and ≥ 20% of patients receiving triptans had contraindications. In four studies, 10%-44% of patients who tried triptans had insufficient response, although definitions varied. Patients who achieved a sufficient response typically did so with their first triptan; few became responders with additional triptans. Of patients who did not respond to one to two triptans and received another, 45% were dissatisfied with the final triptan. Approximately half of patients who tried two to three triptans had an insufficient response. Greater disability, impact of disease, and depression were reported in triptan discontinuers compared to those with sustained use. Worse quality of life scores and utility values were reported in triptan insufficient versus sufficient responders, as were greater migraine-related costs, work impairment, and health-care resource utilization.

CONCLUSION

The total population of patients unsuitable for triptans is uncertain, but the literature highlights a large group who cannot or do not persist with triptans, and current evidence suggests a high burden in this population and an unmet need for new therapeutic options. Further research is needed to determine the frequency of unsuitability for triptans more precisely and to assess the associated burden.

Real-world study of adverse events associated with triptan use in migraine treatment based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

BACKGROUND

Triptans selectively agoniste 5-Hydroxytryptamine(5-HT) receptors and are widely used in the treatment of migraine. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of comprehensive real-world clinical research on the safety of triptans. In light of the growing prevalence of migraine, it is imperative to gain a deeper understanding of the true extent of adverse events (AEs) associated with triptans in the clinical management of migraine.

METHODS

A database query of AEs reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for triptans was performed using the online platform Open Vigil 2.1. The query spanned the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2023 and extracted all AEs for 'sumatriptan', 'zolmitriptan', 'rizatriptan', and 'naratriptan' from the 15-49 years old population and retrospective quantitative analyses. A proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) methodology were utilized to contrast AEs across the four triptans.

RESULTS

A total of 1.272 AEs reports for sumatriptan, 114 for zolmitriptan, 162 for rizatriptan, and 15 for naratriptan were identified. The ratio of females to males was approximately three times higher in all cases, with the highest number of reports originating from the Americas. A review of the FAERS database revealed that nervous system disorders were the primary SOC category for four drugs, with all four drugs exhibiting the AE indicative of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, also classified as Nervous system disorders. The most frequently reported AE signal for sumatriptan was dyspnea, which is classified as respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders. The most frequently reported AEs signals for the remaining three drugs were nausea, vomiting and terminal ileitis, all of which are classified as gastrointestinal disorders.

CONCLUSION

Analyses have demonstrated that AEs are present in a range of systems, including cardiac, nervous, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal disorders. It should be noted, however, that the incidence and signal intensity of these AEs vary depending on the specific drug in question. In clinical practice, the selection of an appropriate drug and the monitoring of AEs should be tailored to the individual patient's and specific characteristics.

Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Migraine is a common disabling conditions which, globally, affects 15.2% of the population. It is the second cause of health loss in terms of years lived with disability, the first among women. Despite being so common, it is poorly recognised and too often undertreated. Specialty centres and neurologists with specific expertise on headache disorders have the knowledge to provide specific care: however, those who do not regularly treat patients with migraine will benefit from a synopsis on the most relevant and updated information about this condition. This paper presents a comprehensive view on the hallmarks of migraine, from genetics and diagnostic markers, up to treatments and societal impact, and reports the elements that identify migraine specific features.

MAIN RESULTS

The most relevant hallmark of migraine is that it has common and individual features together. Besides the known clinical manifestations, migraine presentation is heterogeneous with regard to frequency of attacks, presence of aura, response to therapy, associated comorbidities or other symptoms, which likely reflect migraine heterogeneous genetic and molecular basis. The amount of therapies for acute and for prophylactic treatment is really wide, and one of the difficulties is with finding the best treatment for the single patient. In addition to this, patients carry out different daily life activities, and might show lifestyle habits which are not entirely adequate to manage migraine day by day. Education will be more and more important as a strategy of brain health promotion, because this will enable reducing the amount of subjects needing specialty care, thus leaving it to those who require it in reason of refractory condition or presence of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing the hallmarks of migraine and the features of single patients enables prescribing specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Medical research on headaches today particularly suffers from the syndrome of single-disease approach, but it is important to have a cross-sectional and joint vision with other close specialties, in order to treat our patients with a comprehensive approach that a heterogeneous condition like migraine requires.

Managing Cluster Headache in Patients with Medical, Psychiatric, and Surgical Comorbidities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

What should a provider know about medications and other treatments in patients with cluster headache who have medical, psychiatric, and surgical comorbidities? What conversations should providers have with patients about living with and managing cluster headache?

RECENT FINDINGS

While the number of treatments used in cluster headache is relatively small, numerous considerations were identified related to managing patients with comorbidities. Many of these touch on cardiac, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular health, but full histories are needed to guide safe and effective treatment. Both older and newer treatments may be contraindicated in certain patients with cluster headache or should be considered carefully. In addition to incorporating medical, psychiatric, and surgical histories in the management plan, collaboration with other providers may be beneficial. Providers should also inquire about patient practices and discuss participation in clinical trials that might be a good fit for the individual.

Triptan use in elderly over 65 years and the risk of hospitalization for serious vascular events

BACKGROUND

Several studies have focused on the use of triptan and the risk of acute vascular events but the existence of such association is still debated and has never been quantified in patients over 65 years. To assess whether triptan use among older is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for acute vascular events.

METHODS

A propensity score-matched cohort study was designed using the French national health insurance database linked to hospital stays. Patients aged ≥ 65 years, newly treated by triptans between 2011 and 2014, were included… The primary event was hospitalization for an acute ischemic vascular event within de 90 days following triptan initiation. Association with triptan exposure was investigated through cox regression model, considering exposure at inclusion, and with exposure as a time-varying variable A case-crossover (CCO) and a self-controlled case series (SCCS) analyses were also conducted to address potential residual confounding.

RESULTS

The cohort included 24, 774 triptan users and 99 096 propensity matched controls (mean (SD) age: 71 years (5.9), 74% of women). Within 90 days after cohort entry, 163 events were observed in the triptan group, and 523 in the control group (0.66% vs. 0.53%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) exposed/not exposed 1.25 95%CI [1.05-1.49]; aHR time-varying 8.74 [5.21-14.66]). The association was significant (CCO) for all events (adjusted odds ratio (aOR1.63 [1.22-2.19]) with a more consistent association with cerebral events (aOR 2.14 [1.26-3.63]). The relative incidence (RI) for all events was 2.13 [1.76-2.58] in the SCCS, for cardiac (RI: 1.67 [1.23-2.27]) and for cerebral events (RI: 3.20, [2.30-4.45]).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of acute vascular events was low among triptan users. We found that triptan use among older may be associated with a low increased risk for acute vascular events, which may be more marked for cerebral events such as stroke, than for cardiac events.

Comparative effectiveness of erenumab versus rimegepant for migraine prevention using matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Aim: To compare the efficacy of erenumab versus rimegepant as preventive treatment for patients with episodic and chronic migraine using an anchor-based matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Methods: Patients from two phase II/III trials for erenumab (NCT02066415 and NCT02456740) were pooled and weighted to match on the baseline effect modifiers (age, sex, race, baseline monthly migraine days [MMDs], and history of chronic migraine [CM]) reported in the phase II/III trial for rimegepant (NCT03732638). Four efficacy outcomes were compared between the two erenumab regimens (70 mg and 140 mg) and rimegepant, including changes in MMDs from baseline to month 1 and month 3, changes in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire role function - restrictive domain score from baseline to month 3, and change in disability from baseline to Month 3. Results: Compared with rimegepant, erenumab 70 mg was associated with a statistically significant reduction in MMDs at month 3 (-0.90 [-1.76, -0.03]; p = 0.042) and erenumab 140 mg was associated with statistically significant reductions in MMDs at month 1 (-0.94 [-1.70, -0.19]; p = 0.014) and month 3 (-1.28 [-2.17, -0.40]; p = 0.005). The erenumab regimens also had numerical advantages over rimegepant for other efficacy outcomes. Conclusion: In the present study, we found that erenumab had a more favorable efficacy profile than rimegepant in reducing MMDs at month 1 and month 3 for migraine prevention. These results may help with decision-making in clinical practice and can be further validated in future clinical trials or real-world studies.

Utilization patterns, cardiovascular risk, and concomitant serotoninergic medications among triptan users between 2008 and 2018: A gender analysis in one Italian region, Tuscany

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pattern of triptan use by gender in Tuscany, Italy, focusing on special user populations in which evidence on triptan safety is still not conclusive.

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence supports the role of gender differences in migraine pathophysiology and treatment. However, gender impact on triptan real-word utilization has been poorly investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study was performed using the population-based Administrative Healthcare Database of Tuscany region (Italy). Subjects registered in the database on the January 1 of each year between 2008 and 2018 were identified. New users (NU) of triptans (ATC:N02CC*) were patients with one or more triptan dispensation during the year of interest and none in the past. Age, cardiovascular comorbidities representing an absolute or a possible contraindication to triptan utilization, concomitant serotonergic medications, and pattern of triptan use during 1-year follow-up were described by gender.

RESULTS

A total of 86,109 patients who received one or more triptan dispensing were identified. Of 64,672 NU (men = 17,039; women = 47,633), 10.2% (6823/64,672) were aged >65 years, who were mostly women (n = 4613). Among NU, men and women with absolute cardiovascular contraindications were 4.3% (740/17,039) and 2.1% (1022/47,633), respectively, while those concomitantly taking serotonergic medications were 17.2% (267/1549) and 21.9% (949/4330), respectively (949/4330). Regular users (two or more dispensing with ≥3 months between first and last observed dispensing) accounted for 26.4% of women (12,597/47,633) and 19.11% of men (3250/17,039); frequent users (≥15 dosage units/month during ≥3 consecutive months) were overall 0.1% (94/64,672) and 62.0% (58/94) of them concomitantly received serotonergic medications.

CONCLUSION

Considering gender differences in triptan use highlighted here, large scale observational studies are warranted to better define what populations are safe to use triptans and whether it is appropriate to tighten or relax certain recommendations on triptan use. In the meantime, any suspected adverse drug reaction observed in the special user populations highlighted in this study should be promptly reported.

Gepants - a long way to cure: a narrative review

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is probably the most potent vasodilator in cerebral circulation. Forty years after its discovery, the new CGRP-targeted therapy monoclonal antibodies, and the small molecule gepants, are now available for clinical practice. While randomized controlled trials and real-world experience consistently demonstrated the high efficacy and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies, limited evidence is available to characterize gepants fully. Depending on pharmacokinetics, these CGRP receptor antagonists can be used for acute (ubrogepant, rimegepant, and the not yet approved zavegepant) or preventive (atogepant and rimegepant) migraine treatment. Randomized placebo-controlled trials demonstrated gepants efficacy in treating acute attacks to obtain 2 h pain freedom in about 20% of patients and pain relief in about 60%, while up to 60% of treated patients with episodic migraine may experience a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days. The most common treatment-related emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal (nausea, constipation) for the acute or preventive use. No vascular or hepatic concerns have emerged so far. More studies are ongoing to investigate gepant tolerability and safety also if associated with monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP and other therapeutic classes. Gepants are also under investigation to treat other painful and non-painful conditions. Real-life studies are necessary to confirm the trials’ findings and investigate more practical clinical aspects.

Triptans and vascular comorbidity in persons over fifty: Findings from a nationwide insurance database – A cohort study

Objective

To gather information about prescription of triptans and to evaluate whether vascular comorbidity differs in users and nonusers of triptans over the age of 50 years.

Background

Beyond the age of 50 years, migraine is still common—yet the incidence of vascular disorders increases. Triptans, medications for treating migraine attacks, are vasoconstrictive drugs and contraindicated in persons with vascular disorders.

Methods

Based on a nationwide insurance database from 2011, we compared the prescription of vascular drugs (identified by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes), vascular diagnoses and hospitalizations, between triptan users greater than 50 years and a matched control group.

Results

Of the 3,116,000 persons over 50 years, 13,833 (0.44%) had at least one triptan prescription; 11,202 (81%) were women. Thirty percent of the triptan users (13,833/47,336 persons) were over 50 years. Of those over 50 years, 6832 (49.4%) had at least one vascular drug and 870 (6.3%) had at least one inpatient vascular diagnosis; 15.7% (2166 of 13,833 users) overused triptans. We compared triptan‐users to 41,400 nonusers, using a 1:3 match. In triptan‐users, prescriptions of cardiac therapies and beta blockers were significantly more common (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24–1.47 and OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.14–1.25, respectively); whereas prescriptions of calcium channel blockers and renin/angiotensin inhibitors were significantly less common (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76–0.88 and OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.72–0.79, respectively). The prescriptions of antihypertensive, diuretic, and antilipidemic drugs as well as platelet inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors did not differ in users and nonusers. Triptan users had significantly more hospital stays (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.33–1.45); however, the number of days spent in the hospital and more importantly the frequency of inpatient vascular diagnoses did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion

In persons over 50 years of age, a prescription of triptans is common. Vascular comorbidity is comparable in users and nonusers of triptans showing that triptans are prescribed despite vascular comorbidity and suggesting that triptan use does not increase vascular risk in patients with migraine over the age of 50 years. Nevertheless, regular evaluation for contraindications against triptans and for vascular risk factors is recommended in this age group.

Functionality, satisfaction, and global impression of change with ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in triptan insufficient responders: a post hoc analysis of the ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II randomized trials

Background

Triptans are the first-line option for the acute treatment of migraine attacks; however, triptans are contraindicated in people with certain underlying cardiovascular risk factors and are associated with inadequate efficacy or poor tolerability in some individuals. Ubrogepant is an oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine.

Methods

This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 ACHIEVE trials examined the impact of ubrogepant on the Functional Disability Scale (FDS), satisfaction with medication, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in participants who were self-reported triptan insufficient responders (TIRs), defined as those who are unable to take triptans due to contraindications, tolerability issues, or insufficient efficacy. Responder definitions for the FDS, satisfaction measures, and PGIC were based on qualitative interpretation of the respective response options for the pooled ubrogepant 50 mg and placebo groups.

Results

In the pooled analysis population (n = 1799), 451 (25%) participants were TIRs, with most (80%) reporting insufficient efficacy with triptan use. A significantly higher proportion of TIRs treated with ubrogepant vs placebo reported being able to function normally from 2 to 8 h post dose (P < 0.05). Notably, significance was demonstrated at the time of the primary outcome assessments (2 h post dose), where rates of normal function were 38% for ubrogepant vs 29% for placebo (P = 0.048). A greater proportion of TIRs in the ubrogepant arm vs the placebo arm were satisfied with treatment at 2 (33% vs 21%, P = 0.006) and 24 h (58% vs 28%, P < 0.001) and indicated that their migraine improved at 2 h vs placebo (30% vs 18%, P = 0.006). Results were generally similar in the insufficient efficacy subpopulation of TIRs as in the overall TIRs group. Ubrogepant was safe and well tolerated in TIRs, with no new safety signals identified.

Conclusions

In people with migraine who are TIRs, individuals treated with ubrogepant had favorable 2-h outcomes, as measured by the FDS, satisfaction with medication, and PGIC, compared with placebo.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02828020 (ACHIEVE I), registered July 11, 2016; NCT02867709 (ACHIEVE II), registered August 16, 2016.

Migraine

Migraine is a common, chronic, disorder that is typically characterized by recurrent disabling attacks of headache and accompanying symptoms, including aura. The aetiology is multifactorial with rare monogenic variants. Depression, epilepsy, stroke and myocardial infarction are comorbid diseases. Spreading depolarization probably causes aura and possibly also triggers trigeminal sensory activation, the underlying mechanism for the headache. Despite earlier beliefs, vasodilation is only a secondary phenomenon and vasoconstriction is not essential for antimigraine efficacy. Management includes analgesics or NSAIDs for mild attacks, and, for moderate or severe attacks, triptans or 5HT_1B/1D receptor agonists. Because of cardiovascular safety concerns, unreliable efficacy and tolerability issues, use of ergots to abort attacks has nearly vanished in most countries. CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) and lasmiditan, a selective 5HT1_F receptor agonist, have emerged as effective acute treatments. Intramuscular onabotulinumtoxinA may be helpful in chronic migraine (migraine on ≥15 days per month) and monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor, as well as two gepants, have proven effective and well tolerated for the preventive treatment of migraine. Several neuromodulation modalities have been approved for acute and/or preventive migraine treatment. The emergence of new treatment targets and therapies illustrates the bright future for migraine management.

The serotonin toxidrome: shortfalls of current diagnostic criteria for related syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Serotonin syndrome (toxicity) describes adverse drug effects from toxic amounts of intra-synaptic central nervous system serotonin. A wide range of drugs have been implicated to cause serotonin toxicity, not all justifiably. The plausible agents all have a final common pathway resulting in a substantial increase in central nervous system serotonergic neurotransmission. Serotonin toxicity is characterized by neuromuscular excitation, mental status changes, and autonomic dysregulation. Signs and symptoms represent a spectrum of toxicity (mild to life-threatening) related to increasing serotonin concentrations. As there is no consensus on the threshold for "toxicity" or diagnostic criteria, the true incidence of serotonin toxicity is unknown. The incidence in overdose is easier to quantify and is reasonably common in serotonergic antidepressant overdoses. In a large case series of overdoses, moderate serotonin toxicity occurred in 14% of poisonings with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. While half those ingesting a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in combination with a serotonergic agent in overdose exhibit at least moderately severe serotonin toxicity. In contrast, the incidence of serotonin toxicity in those on therapeutic serotonergic agents appears to be very low.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a narrative review of the current diagnostic criteria, utilizing case reports of fatalities to evaluate how many meet the various diagnostic criteria and propose practical solutions to resolve controversies in diagnosis.

METHODS

A review of serotonin toxicity diagnostic criteria in the English literature was completed by searching Embase and PubMed from January 1990 to July 2021 for the keywords "serotonin syndrome/toxicity" paired with "diagnostic criteria" or "diagnosis." Also, fatal cases of serotonin toxicity identified from a recent systematic review were independently examined to determine what diagnostic criteria were met and whether serotonin toxicity or another cause was most likely.

REVIEW OF DIAGNOSIS CRITERIA

Serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, four diagnostic criteria (Sternbach, Serotonin Syndrome Scale, Radomski, and Hunter) have been proposed. However, the Serotonin Syndrome Scale has not been validated in patients with serotonin toxicity and only utilized in those on a serotonergic agent. The remaining three criteria are utilized more widely but have undergone little refinement or validation.

REVIEW OF FATAL CASES

Shortfalls with diagnostic criteria can be illustrated by examining case fatalities. Of 55 fatal cases reviewed, 12 (22%) were unlikely to be serotonin toxicity. Sternbach and Radomski criteria were met by 25 (45%), 20 (36%) had insufficient data reported and 10 (18%) met an exclusion criterion. Few had sufficient information reported to determine whether Hunter Criteria were met, with only 13 (24%) documented as meeting the criteria, the remaining 42 (76%) had insufficient data.

RESOLVING SHORTFALLS IN CURRENT DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA

As serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, issues arise when basing the diagnosis on symptom criteria alone, without considering whether the drug/s ingested increase central nervous system serotonin or whether there is an alternative diagnosis. This has resulted in case reports and government warnings for drugs that cannot plausibly cause significant serotonin toxicity (e.g., ondansetron and antipsychotics). We propose when assessing for a serotonin toxidrome, both the causative agent(s) and clinical scenario is considered to determine the likelihood of serotonin toxicity. Then the clinical features assessed, those with a moderate to high prior probability (e.g., serotonergic drug-drug interaction, overdose, recent initiation or increase in dose of serotonergic agent/s) could be diagnosed based on the Hunter criteria. However, those with a low probability (e.g., stable therapeutic doses of a serotonergic agent) require more specific and stringent criteria. Finally, we propose a minimum dataset for case reports/series of serotonin toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

More complete and accurate reporting of serotonin toxicity cases is required in the future, to avoid further misleading associations that are physiologically implausible.

Evaluating Drug Risk Using GAN and SMOTE Based on CFDA's Spontaneous Reporting Data

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) pose health threats to humans. Therefore, the risk re-evaluation of post-marketing drugs has become an important part of the pharmacovigilance work of various countries. In China, drugs are mainly divided into three categories, from high-risk to low-risk drugs, namely, prescription drugs (Rx), over-the-counter drugs A (OTC-A), and over-the-counter drugs B (OTC-B). Until now, there has been a lack of automated evaluation methods for the three status switch of drugs. Based on China Food and Drug Administration's (CFDA) spontaneous reporting database (CSRD), we proposed a classification model to predict risk level of drugs by using feature enhancement based on Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) and Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE). A total of 985,960 spontaneous reports from 2011 to 2018 were selected from CSRD in Jiangsu Province as experimental data. After data preprocessing, a class-imbalance data set was obtained, which contained 887 Rx (accounting for 84.72%), 113 OTC-A (10.79%), and 47 OTC-B (4.49%). Taking drugs as the samples, ADRs as the features, and signal detection results obtained by proportional reporting ratio (PRR) method as the feature values, we constructed the original data matrix, where the last column represents the category label of each drug. Our proposed model expands the ADR data from both the sample space and the feature space. In terms of feature space, we use feature selection (FS) to screen ADR symptoms with higher importance scores. Then, we use GAN to generate artificial data, which are added to the feature space to achieve feature enhancement. In terms of sample space, we use SMOTE technology to expand the minority samples to balance three categories of drugs and minimize the classification deviation caused by the gap in the sample size. Finally, we use random forest (RF) algorithm to classify the feature-enhanced and balanced data set. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the proposed classification model reaches 98%. Our proposed model can well evaluate drug risk levels and provide automated methods for status switch of post-marketing drugs.

Pathophysiological Bases of Comorbidity in Migraine

Despite that it is commonly accepted that migraine is a disorder of the nervous system with a prominent genetic basis, it is comorbid with a plethora of medical conditions. Several studies have found bidirectional comorbidity between migraine and different disorders including neurological, psychiatric, cardio- and cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, metaboloendocrine, and immunological conditions. Each of these has its own genetic load and shares some common characteristics with migraine. The bidirectional mechanisms that are likely to underlie this extensive comorbidity between migraine and other diseases are manifold. Comorbid pathologies can induce and promote thalamocortical network dysexcitability, multi-organ transient or persistent pro-inflammatory state, and disproportionate energetic needs in a variable combination, which in turn may be causative mechanisms of the activation of an ample defensive system with includes the trigeminovascular system in conjunction with the neuroendocrine hypothalamic system. This strategy is designed to maintain brain homeostasis by regulating homeostatic needs, such as normal subcortico-cortical excitability, energy balance, osmoregulation, and emotional response. In this light, the treatment of migraine should always involves a multidisciplinary approach, aimed at identifying and, if necessary, eliminating possible risk and comorbidity factors.

Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Conditions as Clinical Predictors of Myocarditis Reporting with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A VigiBase Study

Simple Summary

Up to 50% of myocarditis events developed in cancer patients upon treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are fatal. Therefore, identification of clinical risk factors predicting myocarditis onset during treatment with ICIs is important for the purpose of cardiac surveillance of high-risk patients. The aim of this retrospective matched case-control study was to assess whether pre-existing cardiovascular conditions were associated with the reporting of myocarditis with ICIs in VigiBase, the World Health Organization global database of suspected adverse drug reactions. Taking drugs labelled for the treatment of cardiovascular conditions as a proxy for concomitant cardiovascular risk factors and/or cardiovascular diseases, we found an association of moderate size between pre-existing cardiovascular conditions and the reporting of myocarditis with ICIs. Future prospective pharmacoepidemiological studies should assess the causal relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular conditions and myocarditis onset in a cohort of cancer patients followed during treatment with ICIs.

Abstract

Although rare, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related myocarditis can be life-threatening, even fatal. In view of increased ICI prescription, identification of clinical risk factors for ICI-related myocarditis is of primary importance. This study aimed to assess whether pre-existing cardiovascular (CV) patient conditions are associated with the reporting of ICI-related myocarditis in VigiBase, the WHO global database of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In a (retrospective) matched case-control study, 108 cases of ICI-related myocarditis and 108 controls of ICI-related ADRs other than myocarditis were selected from VigiBase. Drugs labeled as treatment for CV conditions (used as a proxy for concomitant CV risk factors and/or CV diseases) were found to be associated more strongly with the reporting of ICI-related myocarditis than with other ICI-related ADRs (McNemar’s chi-square test of marginal homogeneity: p = 0.026, Cramer’s coefficient of effect size: Φ = 0.214). No significant association was found between pre-existing diabetes and ICI-related myocarditis reporting (McNemar’s test of marginal homogeneity: p = 0.752). These findings offer an invitation for future prospective pharmacoepidemiological studies to assess the causal relationship between pre-existing CV conditions and myocarditis onset in a cohort of cancer patients followed during ICI treatment.

Migraine and other headache disorders in pregnancy

Migraine prevalence is three times higher in women than in men during fertile years, which is mainly due to sex hormone differences. The majority of women suffering from migraine without aura report improvement of their migraine attacks during pregnancy. Migraine attacks with aura can also improve during pregnancy, but more often remain the same or worsen. Anovulation caused by lactation is generally associated with a decrease in migraine attacks in breastfeeding women. This chapter describes the current knowledge on acute and prophylactic treatment options of migraine and other primary headache disorders during pregnancy and lactation. Further, clinical profiles of secondary headaches during pregnancy and the postpartum period are summarized.

Chinese herbal medicine for headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) are widely used to relieve headache in Asia. However, it is uncertain whether there is robust evidence on the effects of CHMs for headache.

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of CHMs for headache using systematic review of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Electronic search was conducted on six databases from inception to January 2018. We included the RCTs that met the requirement of at least 4 out of the 7 domains according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Thirty RCTs with 3447 subjects were ultimately included for analysis and all trials were conducted in Asia. Meta-analysis showed that CHMs monotherapy were superior to placebo in reducing headache frequency [SMD -0.48 (95% CI -0.76, -0.20); p < 0.01], headache days [SMD -0.29 (95% CI -0.45, -0.13); p < 0.01], headache duration[SMD -0.58 (95% CI -0.81, -0.36); p < 0.01], headache intensity [SMD -0.42 (95% CI -0.62, -0.23); p < 0.01] and analgesic consumption [SMD -0.36 (95% CI -0.52, -0.21); p < 0.01] and improving clinical efficacy rate (p < 0.01). Similarly, CHMs monotherapy were superior to western conventional medicines (WCMs) in headache frequency [SMD -0.57 (95% CI -0.84, -0.29); p < 0.01], headache days (p < 0.01), analgesic consumption [SMD -1.63 (95% CI -1.98, -1.28); p < 0.01], headache intensity [SMD -0.81 (95% CI -1.06, -0.57); p < 0.01], and clinical efficacy rate [RR 1.24 (95% CI 1.18, 1.31); p < 0.01], except reducing headache duration (p > 0.05). CHMs adjunct therapy can improve clinical efficacy rate compared with WCMs alone [RR 1.15 (95% CI 1.09, 1.22); p < 0.01]. Meanwhile, CHMs had fewer adverse events than that of controls.

CONCLUSION

The findings supported, at least to an extent, the use of CHM for headache patients; however, we should treat the results cautiously because the clinical heterogeneity.

ADEpedia-on-OHDSI: A next generation pharmacovigilance signal detection platform using the OHDSI common data model

OBJECTIVE

Supplementing the Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) with Electronic Health Record (EHR) data for adverse drug reaction detection could augment sample size, increase population heterogeneity and cross-validate results for pharmacovigilance research. The difference in the underlying data structures and terminologies between SRS and EHR data presents challenges when attempting to integrate the two into a single database. The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) collaboration provides a Common Data Model (CDM) for organizing and standardizing EHR data to support large-scale observational studies. The objective of the study is to develop and evaluate an informatics platform known as ADEpedia-on-OHDSI, where spontaneous reporting data from FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is converted into the OHDSI CDM format towards building a next generation pharmacovigilance signal detection platform.

METHODS

An extraction, transformation and loading (ETL) tool was designed, developed, and implemented to convert FAERS data into the OHDSI CDM format. A comprehensive evaluation, including overall ETL evaluation, mapping quality evaluation of drug names to RxNorm, and an evaluation of transformation and imputation quality, was then performed to assess the mapping accuracy and information loss using the FAERS data collected between 2012 and 2017. Previously published findings related to vascular safety profile of triptans were validated using ADEpedia-on-OHDSI in pharmacovigilance research. For the triptan-related vascular event detection, signals were detected by Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) in high-level group terms (HLGT) level, high-level terms (HLT) level and preferred term (PT) level using the original FAERS data and CDM-based FAERS respectively. In addition, six standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) related to vascular events were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 4,619,362 adverse event cases were loaded into 8 tables in the OHDSI CDM. For drug name mapping, 93.9% records and 47.0% unique names were matched with RxNorm codes. Mapping accuracy of drug names was 96% based on a manual verification of randomly sampled 500 unique mappings. Information loss evaluation showed that more than 93% of the data is loaded into the OHDSI CDM for most fields, with the exception of drug route data (66%). The replication study detected 5, 18, 47 and 6, 18, 50 triptan-related vascular event signals in MedDRA HLGT level, HLT level, and PT level for the original FAERS data and CDM-based FAERS respectively. The signal detection scores of six standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) of vascular events in the raw data study were found to be lower than those scores in the CDM study.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of this work would facilitate seamless integration and combined analyses of both SRS and EHR data for pharmacovigilance in ADEpedia-on-OHDSI, our platform for next generation pharmacovigilance.

Use and overuse of triptans in Austria - a survey based on nationwide healthcare claims data

BACKGROUND

To evaluate triptan use and overuse as well as prescription patterns in Austria based on a nationwide healthcare database because data on triptan use and overuse in Austria is missing.

METHODS

We included all persons insured with one of 19 Austrian social security institutions in 2007. Inclusion criteria comprised an age of 18-99 years, known sex, and receipt of insurance benefits. We defined triptan use as ≥1 package of a triptan dispensed in 2007 and triptan overuse as ≥30 defined daily doses dispensed in at least one quarter.

RESULTS

Out of 8.295 million inhabitants in Austria, 7,426,412 persons (89.5%) were insured with a social insurance carrier and 5,918,487 persons of those insured (79.7%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the latter 33,062 persons (0,56%) were triptan users and 1970 (0.033%) were triptan overusers. The estimated proportion of persons with migraine using a triptan was less than 6%. Among users 5.9% were overusers of whom 55% overused triptans in ≥2 quarters of 2007. The median number of days of sick-leave was higher in triptan users than in non-users: due to any reason of sick-leave 12 vs. 10, p < 0.001, due to migraine 3 vs. 2, p < 0.001. The proportion of hospital admissions did not differ between triptan users and non-users.

CONCLUSION

The rate of triptan use is low in Austria but triptan users are at risk for triptan overuse. In triptan users more days of sick-leave and the same proportion of hospital admissions as in the older non-users suggest poorer health.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk for Fracture at Specific Sites: Data Mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used to treat gastric acid-related disorders. Concerns have been raised about potential fracture risk, especially at the hip, spine and wrist. However, fracture risk at other bone sites has not been as well studied. We investigated the association between PPIs and specific fracture sites using an aggregated knowledge-enhanced database, the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Data Mining Set (AERS-DM). Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was used to detect statistically significant associations (signals) between PPIs and fractures. We analyzed both high level terms (HLT) and preferred terms (PT) for fracture sites, defined by MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities). Of PPI users reporting fractures, the mean age was 65.3 years and the female to male ratio was 3.4:1. Results revealed signals at multiple HLT and PT fracture sites, consistent for both sexes. These included fracture sites with predominant trabecular bone, not previously reported as being associated with PPIs, such as 'rib fractures', where signals were detected for overall PPIs as well as for each of 5 generic ingredients (insufficient data for dexlansoprazole). Based on data mining from AERS-DM, PPI use appears to be associated with an increased risk for fractures at multiple sites.

Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG): Stimulation Mechanism, Safety, and Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the history of and available data on sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) neuromodulation in the treatment of headache up to the present.

BACKGROUND

The SPG has been a therapeutic target to treat primary headache disorders for over 100 years. Multiple destructive lesions have also been tried with variable rate and duration of success. Neurostimulation of the SPG for cluster headache was first described in 2007.

METHODS

This is not a systematic review. The authors review the anatomy and pathophysiology of the SPG and cluster headache and the important clinical trials, relating a history of how SPG neuromodulation reached the current state of approval in the European Union (EU) and pivotal registration study for cluster headache in the US.

RESULTS

The EU approved SPG stimulation for cluster headache with a CE Mark in February of 2012. Since then, several EU countries have elected to reimburse implantation for cluster headache, and over 300 patients have been implanted worldwide.

CONCLUSIONS

Success rates for implanted SPG neuromodulation in the experimental phase of the European randomized controlled trial, in the open label extension trial, and in the registry of patients implanted outside of the trial remain at about two-thirds of patients implanted being responders, defined as being able to terminate at least 50% of attacks or having at least a 50% decrease in attack frequency or both. A US pivotal registration study is underway to confirm these results and obtain FDA approval for this treatment for cluster headache patients. Further studies in migraine are also underway.

Headache, cerebral aneurysms, and the use of triptans and ergot derivatives

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists regarding the correlation between unruptured cerebral aneurysms and their role in headache etiology. It is also unclear whether surgical endovascular treatment may improve or worsen the headache, and if there are predictable factors for headache outcome such as pre-existing headache features, aneurysm characteristics, or other medical history. There is debate regarding safe treatment of migraine in patients with aneurysms, both before and after endovascular treatments. Particularly, there is hesitancy to use the triptans and ergot derivatives such as dihydroergotamine because of their vasoconstrictive effects and concern for adverse events related to the aneurysm such as aneurysmal instability and rupture.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding the anatomy, pathophysiology, and association between headache, untreated vs surgically treated aneurysms, and the use of triptans and ergot derivatives for migraine treatment in this setting.

CONCLUSION

Associations between some headaches and aneurysms may exist. Some chronic headaches may respond to surgical aneurysm repair while others may worsen. These associations are undefined by current literature because of variable results, study methods, and limited data. Prospective studies are needed which incorporate pre- and post-procedure headache character and diagnosis, aneurysm characteristics, type of aneurysm repair, associated risk factors for worsening post-procedure headache, and ultimately combining all of these data to better predict headache outcome following surgical aneurysm treatment. Lastly, the caution and avoidance of triptan and ergot derivative use for migraine in the setting of aneurysm is not supported by the current evidence, and much of this concern may be excessive and unwarranted, although more evidence confirming safety is needed.

Triptans use and overuse: A pharmacoepidemiology study from the French health insurance system database covering 4.1 million people

Introduction

The objective of this study was to estimate and to characterize the actual patterns of triptan use and overuse in France using a drug reimbursement database.

Methods

We included all people covered by the French General Health Insurance System (GHIS) from the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur (PACA) and Corsica administrative areas who had at least one dispensed dose of triptans between May 2010 and December 2011. All dispensed doses of triptans, migraine prophylactic treatment and psychotropic medications were extracted from the GHIS database. Triptan overuse was defined as triptan use >20 defined daily doses (DDD) per month on a regular basis for more than three consecutive months. Risk of overuse was assessed using logistic regression adjusted for gender and age.

Results

We included 99,540 patients who had at least one prescription of a triptan over the 20 months of the study. Among them, 2243 patients (2.3%) were identified as overusers and received 20.2% of the total DDD prescribed. Twelve percent of overusers and 6.9% of non-overusers were aged more than 65 years (OR: 1.81). Overusers did not have a greater number of prescribers and pharmacists than non-overusers. They were more frequently prescribed a prophylactic medication for migraine treatment (56.8% vs 35.9%, OR: 2.36), benzodiazepines (69.9% vs 54.7%, OR: 1.93) and antidepressants (49.4% vs 30.2%, OR: 2.33).

Conclusions

This work suggests that triptan overuse may be due to insufficient prescriber awareness of appropriate prescribing. The off-label prescription of triptans among the elderly necessitates investigating their cardiovascular risk profile in this sub-group.

Adverse cardiovascular events associated with triptans and ergotamines for treatment of migraine: systematic review of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Apart from the underlying cardiovascular (CV) risk associated with migraine, both triptans and ergotamines can induce vasoconstriction and potentially increase the risk of serious ischemic events. Because of the low frequency of such events in eligible patients, randomized controlled trials are not exhaustive to assess the drug-related CV risk. Observational studies are, therefore, an essential source of information to clarify this matter of concern.

AIM

The aim of this study was to systematically review the available published observational studies investigating the risk of serious CV events in triptan or ergotamine users, as compared to unexposed migraineur controls.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases for cohort or case-control studies up to December 1, 2013. Studies retrieved from CDSR, DARE and HTA databases of the Cochrane Library were used for snowballing. Studies investigating the risk of any CV outcome in patients with a migraine diagnosis and exposed to triptans or ergotamines were considered for inclusion. Selection of studies, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were computed using a random-effects model for studies and outcomes judged eligible for quantitative data synthesis.

RESULTS

From a total of 3370 citations retrieved, after duplicate removal and screening, only four studies met the inclusion criteria (three nested case-control analyses and one retrospective cohort study). These studies investigated the risk of different CV outcomes associated with either the recency or the intensity of exposure to the studied drugs. As for the intensity of use, the pooled OR of serious ischemic events was 2.28 (95% CI 1.18-4.41; I (2 )= 0%) for ergotamine use (two studies), whereas for triptans (three studies) it was 0.86 (95% CI 0.52-1.43; I (2 )= 24.5%). Recent use of ergotamines was not significantly associated with any CV outcome (only one available study). Two studies investigated the risk of stroke related to recent triptan use: the first study reported an OR of 0.90 (0.64-1.26), and the second one suggested an increased risk of 2.51 (1.10-5.71). In this case, because of the high degree of heterogeneity, results were not pooled.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, few comparative observational studies have investigated the CV safety of migraine-specific drugs in clinical practice. Evidence gathered here suggests that intense consumption of ergotamines may be associated with an increased risk of serious ischemic complications. As for triptans, available studies do not suggest strong CV safety issues, although no firm conclusions can be drawn. In particular, evidence on stroke risk is conflicting. However, if an increase of the absolute stroke risk in recently exposed patients does actually exist, it must be small. Overall, residual uncontrolled confounding factors reduce the confidence in the risk estimates collected from the included studies. Further investigations are needed to better define the risk for rare but serious CV events related to triptan and ergotamine use for treatment of migraine.

Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cluster headache

Cluster headache is a severe, debilitating disorder with pain that ranks among the most severe known to humans. Patients with cluster headaches have few therapeutic options and further, 10-20% develop drug-resistant attacks. The often brief duration of cluster attacks makes abortive therapy a challenge, and preventive medications are almost always provided to patients, but the side effects of these preventive medications can be significant. The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) is believed to play a role in headache pain and cranial autonomic symptoms associated with cluster headache, which is a result of activation of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex. For over 100 years, the SPG has been a clinical target to treat primary headache disorders using pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods. Radiofrequency lesioning and nerve-resection therapies, while initially beneficial, are irreversible procedures, and the use of neurostimulation provides one method of interfacing with the neural pathways without causing permanent damage to neural tissue. SPG neurostimulation is both reversible and adjustable, and has recently been tested in both proof-of-concept work and in a randomized, sham-controlled trial for the treatment of cluster headache. A randomized, sham-controlled study of 32 patients was performed to evaluate further the use of SPG stimulation for the acute treatment of chronic cluster headache. Of the 32 patients, 28 completed the randomized experimental period. Overall, 68% of patients experienced an acute response, a frequency response, or both. In this study the majority of adverse events were related to the implantation procedure, which typically resolved or remained mild in nature at 3 months following the implant procedure. This and other studies highlight the promise of using SPG stimulation to treat the pain-associated cluster headache. SPG stimulation could be a safe and effective option for chronic cluster headache.