1
|
Borrelli A, Valeriani M, Monte G, Ursitti F, Proietti Checchi M, Tarantino S, Sforza G, Papetti L. Cluster Headache: Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment in Pediatric Headache. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1203. [PMID: 38592050 PMCID: PMC10931656 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite its rarity, cluster headache can affect children. Patients with cluster headaches often experience symptoms in their adolescence, but the time it takes for a correct diagnosis can be very long. Cluster headache can be mistaken for other pathologies, which can result in patients being diagnosed and treated incorrectly. CH therapy often represents a challenge in pediatric age as there are no studies dedicated to this age category and the therapy strategy is generally based on data from adult experience. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the current literature on cluster headache in children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Borrelli
- Academic Department of Pediatrics, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Headache Center, Developmental Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.V.); (G.M.); (F.U.); (M.P.C.); (S.T.); (G.S.)
- Medicine Department, Hospital of Rome, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
- Center for Sensory Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Gabriele Monte
- Headache Center, Developmental Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.V.); (G.M.); (F.U.); (M.P.C.); (S.T.); (G.S.)
| | - Fabiana Ursitti
- Headache Center, Developmental Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.V.); (G.M.); (F.U.); (M.P.C.); (S.T.); (G.S.)
| | - Martina Proietti Checchi
- Headache Center, Developmental Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.V.); (G.M.); (F.U.); (M.P.C.); (S.T.); (G.S.)
| | - Samuela Tarantino
- Headache Center, Developmental Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.V.); (G.M.); (F.U.); (M.P.C.); (S.T.); (G.S.)
| | - Giorgia Sforza
- Headache Center, Developmental Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.V.); (G.M.); (F.U.); (M.P.C.); (S.T.); (G.S.)
| | - Laura Papetti
- Headache Center, Developmental Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.V.); (G.M.); (F.U.); (M.P.C.); (S.T.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prasad S, Mehadi A, Kaka N, Jhaveri S, Avanthika C, Patel N, Augustine I, Issani A. Diagnostic protocols and newer treatment modalities for cluster headache. Dis Mon 2022; 68:101316. [PMID: 35000758 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Cluster Headaches are one of the most arguably severe forms of primary headache syndrome that affects humans. Although it is relatively uncommon, it has a significant impact on the quality of life. It is a multifactorial disease that has risk factors ranging from seasonal changes, lifestyle habits to genetics. It occurs in 2 forms- Episodic and Chronic, each having its well-defined Diagnostic Criteria. Moreover, Cluster Headache has an exhaustive list of options for both Preventive and Abortive treatment. This article focuses on Cluster Headache, its pathophysiology, risk factors, differentials, and its diverse treatment modalities. In this study, an all-language literature search was conducted on Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar till October 2021. The following search strings and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used: "Cluster Headache," "Triptans," "Neuromodulation," and "Migraine." We explored the literature on Cluster Headache for its epidemiology, pathophysiology, the role of various genes and how they bring about the disease as well as its episodic and chronic variants, and treatment options. Although we have a wide variety of options for Preventive and Abortive therapy, newer more effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are being developed, and must be integrated into new treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakshi Prasad
- Faculty of Medicine, National Pirogov, Memorial Medical University, 21018, Vinnytsya, Ukraine.
| | | | - Nirja Kaka
- GMERS Medical College, Himmatnagar 383001, Gujarat, India.
| | - Sharan Jhaveri
- Smt. NHL Municipal Medical college, Ahmedabad 380006, India.
| | - Chaithanya Avanthika
- Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences,PB Road, Hubli 580022, Karnataka, India.
| | - Neil Patel
- GMERS Medical College, Himmatnagar 383001, Gujarat, India.
| | - Ivan Augustine
- Government Medical college Thrissur 680596, Kerala,India.
| | - Ali Issani
- Baqai Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giniatullin R. 5-hydroxytryptamine in migraine: The puzzling role of ionotropic 5-HT 3 receptor in the context of established therapeutic effect of metabotropic 5-HT 1 subtypes. Br J Pharmacol 2021; 179:400-415. [PMID: 34643938 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) is traditionally considered as a key mediator implicated in migraine. Multiple 5-HT receptor subtypes contribute to a variety of region-specific functional effects. The raphé nuclei control nociceptive inputs by releasing 5-HT in the brainstem, whereas dural mast cells provide the humoral source of 5-HT in the meninges. Triptans (5-HT1B/D agonists) and ditans (5-HT1F agonists) are the best established 5-HT anti-migraine agents. However, activation of meningeal afferents via ionotropic 5-HT3 receptors results in long-lasting excitatory drive suggesting a pro-nociceptive role for these receptors in migraine. Nevertheless, clinical data do not clearly support the applicability of currently available 5-HT3 antagonists to migraine treatment. The reasons for this might be the presence of 5-HT3 receptors on inhibitory interneurons dampening the excitatory drive, a lack of 5-HT3 A-E subunit-selective antagonists and gender/age-dependent effects. This review is focusing on the controversial role of 5-HT3 receptors in migraine pathology and related pharmacological perspectives of 5-HT ligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashid Giniatullin
- A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Laboratory of Neurobiology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
González-Hernández A, Marichal-Cancino BA, Villalón CM. The impact of CGRPergic monoclonal antibodies on prophylactic antimigraine therapy and potential adverse events. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2021; 17:1223-1235. [PMID: 34535065 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1982892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is a prevalent medical condition and the second most disabling neurological disorder. Regarding its pathophysiology, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a key role, and, consequently, specific antimigraine pharmacotherapy has been designed to target this system. Hence, apart from the gepants, the recently developed monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a novel approach to treat this disorder. In this review we consider the current knowledge on the mechanisms of action, specificity, safety, and efficacy of the above mAbs as prophylactic antimigraine agents, and examine the possible adverse events that these agents may trigger. Antimigraine mAbs act as direct scavengers of CGRP (galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab) or against the CGRP receptor (erenumab). Due to their long half-lives, these molecules have revolutionized the prophylactic treatment of this neurovascular disorder. Moreover, because of their physicochemical properties, these agents are hepato-friendly and do not cross the blood-brain barrier (highlighting the relevance of peripheral mechanisms in migraine). Nevertheless, apart from potential cardiovascular side effects, the interaction with AMY1 receptors and immunogenicity induced by autoantibodies against mAbs could be a concern for the safety of long-term treatment with these molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abimael González-Hernández
- Departamento de Neurobiología del Desarrollo y Neurofisiología, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, México
| | - Bruno A Marichal-Cancino
- Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Ciudad Universitaria, Aguascalientes, México
| | - Carlos M Villalón
- Departamento de Farmacobiología, Cinvestav‑Coapa, Ciudad de México, México
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mavridis T, Breza M, Deligianni C, Mitsikostas DD. Current advances in the management of cluster headaches. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:1931-1943. [PMID: 33989098 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1924148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Cluster headache (CH) is probably the most severe idiopathic pain condition, yet its current medical management remains poor.Areas covered: Only repurpose medicines are currently in use for the prevention of CH, partially because the pathophysiology of the condition is still elusive. In this article we performed a systematic review to evaluate the evidence for efficacy of the currently available or emerging treatments for CH.Expert opinion: We found several ongoing randomized clinical trials testing prophylactic treatments for CH and only few for the standard ones. Recent data from randomized trials with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway (anti-CGRP mAbs) are controversial, although its role in the pathogenesis of the condition is well documented. This inconsistency may depict inadequacies in clinical trial designing. Anti-CGRP mAbs and antagonists of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) along with neuromodulation techniques, are curing the necessary valuable evidence that could illuminate the therapeutical future for cluster headache. Orexin pathway is another attractive target for CH treatment. To improve the evidence for efficacy, we further propose that the design of the clinical trials for CH needs to be radically reviewed to allow more patients to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros Mavridis
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianthi Breza
- 1 Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- 1 Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Primaries non-migraine headaches treatment: a review. Neurol Sci 2020; 41:385-394. [PMID: 33021705 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04762-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
In the "headache world," great attention has always been paid to migraine patients, especially for the research and development of new therapies. For the other forms of primary headaches, especially those of Chapters 2 and 3 of the classification, there are however therapies that, even if not specific, can give significant results. Tension-type headache recognizes in NSAIDs the most effective drugs to treat acute attack, while prevention is based on the use of tricyclic antidepressants and muscle relaxants. For TACs, the discussion is more complex: first of all, there are two forms of primary headache that respond absolutely to indomethacin. For these, the main problem is how to manage the possible side effects arising from prolonged treatments and possibly what to use as an alternative. For cluster headaches and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks, we have drugs with good efficacy as regards medical therapy, such as verapamil or lamotrigine, but in recent years, neuromodulation techniques, both surgical and non-invasive, have also been affirming themselves, which represent a more possibility for forms of headache that are often very disabling and resistant to common analgesics.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Cluster headache is characterised by attacks of excruciating unilateral headache or facial pain lasting 15 min to 3 h and is seen as one of the most intense forms of pain. Cluster headache attacks are accompanied by ipsilateral autonomic symptoms such as ptosis, miosis, redness or flushing of the face, nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, peri-orbital swelling and/or restlessness or agitation. Cluster headache treatment entails fast-acting abortive treatment, transitional treatment and preventive treatment. The primary goal of prophylactic and transitional treatment is to achieve attack freedom, although this is not always possible. Subcutaneous sumatriptan and high-flow oxygen are the most proven abortive treatments for cluster headache attacks, but other treatment options such as intranasal triptans may be effective. Verapamil and lithium are the preventive drugs of first choice and the most widely used in first-line preventive treatment. Given its possible cardiac side effects, electrocardiogram (ECG) is recommended before treating with verapamil. Liver and kidney functioning should be evaluated before and during treatment with lithium. If verapamil and lithium are ineffective, contraindicated or discontinued because of side effects, the second choice is topiramate. If all these drugs fail, other options with lower levels of evidence are available (e.g. melatonin, clomiphene, dihydroergotamine, pizotifen). However, since the evidence level is low, we also recommend considering one of several neuromodulatory options in patients with refractory chronic cluster headache. A new addition to the preventive treatment options in episodic cluster headache is galcanezumab, although the long-term effects remain unknown. Since effective preventive treatment can take several weeks to titrate, transitional treatment can be of great importance in the treatment of cluster headache. At present, greater occipital nerve injection is the most proven transitional treatment. Other options are high-dose prednisone or frovatriptan.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuypers KPC, Ng L, Erritzoe D, Knudsen GM, Nichols CD, Nichols DE, Pani L, Soula A, Nutt D. Microdosing psychedelics: More questions than answers? An overview and suggestions for future research. J Psychopharmacol 2019; 33:1039-1057. [PMID: 31303095 PMCID: PMC6732823 DOI: 10.1177/0269881119857204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past few years, the issue of 'microdosing' psychedelics has been openly discussed in the public arena where claims have been made about their positive effect on mood state and cognitive processes such as concentration. However, there are very few scientific studies that have specifically addressed this issue, and there is no agreed scientific consensus on what microdosing is. AIM This critique paper is designed to address questions that need to be answered by future scientific studies and to offer guidelines for these studies. APPROACH Owing to its proximity for a possible approval in clinical use and short-lasting pharmacokinetics, our focus is predominantly on psilocybin. Psilocybin is allegedly, next to lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), one of the two most frequently used psychedelics to microdose. Where relevant and available, data for other psychedelic drugs are also mentioned. CONCLUSION It is concluded that while most anecdotal reports focus on the positive experiences with microdosing, future research should also focus on potential risks of (multiple) administrations of a psychedelic in low doses. To that end, (pre)clinical studies including biological (e.g. heart rate, receptor turnover and occupancy) as well as cognitive (e.g. memory, attention) parameters have to be conducted and will shed light on the potential negative consequences microdosing could have.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim PC Kuypers
- Department of Neuropsychology and
Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Livia Ng
- Department of Psychology, University
College London, London, UK
| | - David Erritzoe
- Department of Psychology,
Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gitte M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit,
Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Charles D Nichols
- Department of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New
Orleans, LA, USA
| | - David E Nichols
- Purdue University College of Pharmacy,
West Lafayette, LA, USA
| | - Luca Pani
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral
Sciences, Psychiatry University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic
& Neural Sciences, University of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - David Nutt
- Neuropsychopharmacology, Imperial
College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cluster headache stands among the worst debilitating pain conditions. Available treatments for cluster headache have often disabling side effects, are not tolerated, or are ineffective. The management of drug-refractory chronic forms is challenging. New treatments are warranted and reported here. RECENT FINDINGS In cluster headache acute treatment, delivery systems like Demand Valve Oxygen or nonrebreather-type masks could enhance the effectiveness of inhaled oxygen therapy. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation relieves cluster headache pain at short-term in episodic patients. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation combines acute and preventive properties in subsets of patients and is of interest in selected refractory chronic forms. In cluster headache prevention, 'hypothalamic' deep brain stimulation is being refined using slightly different stereotactic coordinates or lower risk methods like endoventricular stimulation. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies provide interesting results in episodic cluster headache, have a good safety profile, but do not appear effective in chronic cluster headache. SUMMARY These novel approaches provide additional alternatives to conventional cluster headache management, but results obtained in chronic forms are often disappointing. Research on cluster headache is often hampered by the lack of awareness in the medical world and by the relatively low prevalence of cluster headache compared with migraine. However, common features shared by these two primary headaches could help developing disease-specific therapies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Taskiran M, Tasdemir A, Ayyildiz N, Ayyildiz M, Agar E. The effect of serotonin on penicillin-induced epileptiform activity. Int J Neurosci 2019; 129:687-697. [DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1557166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Taskiran
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Abdulkadir Tasdemir
- Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Nusret Ayyildiz
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Ayyildiz
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Erdal Agar
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Cluster headache (CH) is a debilitating primary headache disorder. Although uncommon, affecting only 0.1% of population, it is one of the most painful conditions known to humankind. Three strategies are employed for effective treatment of CH, namely, abortive therapy, transitional therapy, and preventive therapy. Being an uncommon condition, there is a paucity of large-scale controlled trials and evidence of various therapies are based on smaller studies. This review primarily focuses on therapies with highest quality of evidence and also on the emerging therapies for CH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William S. Kingston
- Centre for Headache, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, USA
| | - David W. Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Palmirotta R. Serotonin receptor targeted therapy for migraine treatment: an overview of drugs in phase I and II clinical development. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2017; 26:269-277. [DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1283404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - C. Aurilia
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - G. Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - L. Fofi
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - R. Palmirotta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|