1
|
Youn MS, Kim N, Lee MJ, Kim M. Treatment Outcome After Switching From Galcanezumab to Fremanezumab in Patients With Migraine. J Clin Neurol 2024; 20:300-305. [PMID: 38713076 PMCID: PMC11076194 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP-R) have been widely administered to patients with migraine who show inadequate responses to preventive medications. Among patients in whom a particular anti-CGRP-R mAb is ineffective, switching between different anti-CGRP-R mAbs can be the next option. Few studies have investigated treatment outcomes for antibody switching, especially between mAbs with the same target of the CGRP ligand. We aimed to determine the treatment outcome after switching between two anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab). METHODS We identified migraine patients in a prospective headache clinic registry who received galcanezumab for ≥3 months and were switched to fremanezumab for a further ≥3 months at a single university hospital. We defined a treatment response as a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with a moderate or severe headache at the third month of treatment relative to baseline. The treatment response after switching to fremanezumab was compared with the initial treatment response to galcanezumab. RESULTS Among 21 patients identified in the registry, 7 (33.3%) were initial responders to galcanezumab. After switching to fremanezumab, 7 (33.3%) showed a treatment response. The treatment response rate was 28.6% in the initial responders and 71.4% in the nonresponders to galcanezumab (p>0.999). CONCLUSIONS Switching between anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab) yielded a treatment outcome comparable to that reported previously when switching from an anti-CGRP-R mAb (erenumab) to an anti-CGRP mAb (galcanezumab or fremanezumab). The treatment response to fremanezumab seems to be independent of the prior treatment response to galcanezumab. Our findings suggest that switching to another anti-CGRP mAb can be considered when a particular anti-CGRP mAb is ineffective or intolerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Sojung Youn
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Namoh Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Manho Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rikos D, Vikelis M, Dermitzakis EV, Soldatos P, Rallis D, Rudolf J, Andreou AP, Argyriou AA. Reporting Quality and Risk of Bias Analysis of Published RCTs Assessing Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1964. [PMID: 38610729 PMCID: PMC11012539 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7-100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning "missing information" arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michail Vikelis
- Headache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16675 Athens, Greece;
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Rallis
- Department of Neurology, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, 18536 Athens, Greece;
| | - Jobst Rudolf
- Department of Neurology, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 54645 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Anna P. Andreou
- Headache Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Headache Research-Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE1 1LU, UK
| | - Andreas A. Argyriou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bruijn N, van Lohuizen R, Boron M, Fitzek M, Gabriele F, Giuliani G, Melgarejo L, Řehulka P, Sebastianelli G, Triller P, Vigneri S, Özcan B, van den Brink AM. Influence of metabolic state and body composition on the action of pharmacological treatment of migraine. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:20. [PMID: 38347465 PMCID: PMC10863119 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01724-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a disabling neurovascular disorder among people of all ages, with the highest prevalence in the fertile years, and in women. Migraine impacts the quality of life of affected individuals tremendously and, in addition, it is associated with highly prevalent metabolic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus and thyroid dysfunction. Also, the clinical response to drugs might be affected in patients with metabolic disease due to body composition and metabolic change. Therefore, the efficacy of antimigraine drugs could be altered in patients with both migraine and metabolic disease. However, knowledge of the pharmacology and the related clinical effects of antimigraine drugs in patients with metabolic disease are limited. Therefore, and given the clinical relevance, this article provides a comprehensive overview of the current research and hypotheses related to the influence of metabolic state and body composition on the action of antimigraine drugs. In addition, the influence of antimigraine drugs on metabolic functioning and, vice versa, the influence of metabolic diseases and its hormonal modulating medication on migraine activity is outlined. Future exploration on personalizing migraine treatment to individual characteristics is necessary to enhance therapeutic strategies, especially given its increasing significance in recent decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Bruijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Romy van Lohuizen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Malgorzata Boron
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Mira Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Francesca Gabriele
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Neuroscience Section, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giada Giuliani
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Melgarejo
- Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pavel Řehulka
- St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Gabriele Sebastianelli
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Paul Triller
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Vigneri
- Casa Di Cura Santa Maria Maddalena, Neurology and Neurophysiology Service, Occhiobello, Italy
| | - Behiye Özcan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Maassen van den Brink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lipton RB, Contreras-De Lama J, Serrano D, Engstrom E, Ayasse ND, Poh W, Cadiou F, Manack Adams A. Real-World Use of Ubrogepant as Acute Treatment for Migraine with an Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody: Results from COURAGE. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:69-83. [PMID: 37910303 PMCID: PMC10787718 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00556-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although acute and preventive treatments for migraine are commonly given in combination, data on the real-world effectiveness of ubrogepant as an acute treatment when used with an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (with or without onabotulinumtoxinA) are limited. This analysis sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness, treatment satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine when used in combination with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, with or without concomitant onabotulinumtoxinA. METHODS This prospective, multiple-attack, open-label, observational study (COURAGE) assessed meaningful pain relief (MPR), return to normal function (RNF), treatment satisfaction, and acute treatment optimization of ubrogepant (50 or 100 mg) when combined with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, onabotulinumtoxinA, or both in adult users of Migraine Buddy, a migraine tracking application. RESULTS In the ubrogepant and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody arm (n = 245), following the first ubrogepant-treated attack, 61.6% (151/245) and 80.4% (197/245) of ubrogepant-treated participants achieved MPR at 2 and 4 h post-dose, respectively, and 34.7% (85/245) and 55.5% (136/245) achieved RNF at 2 and 4 h post-dose, respectively. Across up to 10 ubrogepant-treated attacks (N = 1153), MPR was achieved in 51.3% (592/1153) and 73.5% (847/1153) at 2 and 4 h post-dose, respectively. RNF was achieved by 32.2% (371/1153) and 53.2% (613/1153) at 2 and 4 h post-dose. After 30 days, 72.7% (168/231) of participants reported satisfaction (using a 7-point scale) with ubrogepant when used in combination with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, and 79.7% (184/231) of participants achieved acute treatment optimization (defined as moderate-maximum treatment efficacy using the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire-4). CONCLUSION Real-world ubrogepant use with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody was associated with MPR, RNF, satisfaction, and acute treatment optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janette Contreras-De Lama
- Therapeutic Neurotoxins & Migraine, US Medical Affairs, AbbVie, 2525 Dupont Dr, Irvine, CA, 92612, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Aubrey Manack Adams
- Therapeutic Neurotoxins & Migraine, US Medical Affairs, AbbVie, 2525 Dupont Dr, Irvine, CA, 92612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh R, Kumar A, Lather V, Sharma R, Pandita D. Identification of novel signal of Raynaud's phenomenon with Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide(CGRP) antagonists using data mining algorithms and network pharmacological approaches. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:231-238. [PMID: 37594041 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2248877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists are recently approved for the treatment of migraine. AIM The main aim of the current study was to find out the association of CGRP antagonists with RP using data mining algorithms integrated with network pharmacological approaches. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The individual case safety reports were extracted using OpenVigil2.1-MedDRA-V17 (2004Q1-2022Q3), the United States Adverse Event Reporting System (US FAERS). The data mining algorithms i.e. reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence and proportionality reporting ratio (PRR) with associated chi-square value were calculated along with a minimum of three ICSRs to identify the signal. Further, the network was constructed using Cytoscape 3.7.2. Finally, molecular docking was performed using Glide, Schrodinger Inc. RESULTS The PRR ≥2 with a linked chi-square value ≥4, add up of co-occurrence ≥3, and a lower limit of 95% confidence interval of ROR exceeding 2 indicates a positive signal of RP. Further, the network pharmacological and molecular docking results have shown the involvement of insulin-like growth factor 1-receptor (IGF1R) pathways. CONCLUSION The RP is recognized as a novel signal with all CGRP antagonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rima Singh
- Department of Pharmacology, DelhiPharmaceutical Sciences and Research University New Delhi, India
| | - Anoop Kumar
- Department of Pharmacology, DelhiPharmaceutical Sciences and Research University New Delhi, India
| | - Viney Lather
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Amity University Noida, India
| | - Ruchika Sharma
- Centre for Precision Medicine and Pharmacy, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi, India
| | - Deepti Pandita
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Okura Y, Ikawa-Teranishi Y, Mizoroki A, Takahashi N, Tsushima T, Irie M, Harfuddin Z, Miura-Okuda M, Ito S, Nakamura G, Takesue H, Ozono Y, Nishihara M, Yamada K, Gan SW, Hayasaka A, Ishii S, Wakabayashi T, Muraoka M, Nagaya N, Hino H, Nemoto T, Kuramochi T, Torizawa T, Shimada H, Kitazawa T, Okazaki M, Nezu J, Sollid LM, Igawa T. Characterizations of a neutralizing antibody broadly reactive to multiple gluten peptide:HLA-DQ2.5 complexes in the context of celiac disease. Nat Commun 2023; 14:8502. [PMID: 38135691 PMCID: PMC10746718 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44083-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
In human celiac disease (CeD) HLA-DQ2.5 presents gluten peptides to antigen-specific CD4+ T cells, thereby instigating immune activation and enteropathy. Targeting HLA-DQ2.5 with neutralizing antibody for treating CeD may be plausible, yet using pan-HLA-DQ antibody risks affecting systemic immunity, while targeting selected gluten peptide:HLA-DQ2.5 complex (pHLA-DQ2.5) may be insufficient. Here we generate a TCR-like, neutralizing antibody (DONQ52) that broadly recognizes more than twenty-five distinct gluten pHLA-DQ2.5 through rabbit immunization with multi-epitope gluten pHLA-DQ2.5 and multidimensional optimization. Structural analyses show that the proline-rich and glutamine-rich motif of gluten epitopes critical for pathogenesis is flexibly recognized by multiple tyrosine residues present in the antibody paratope, implicating the mechanisms for the broad reactivity. In HLA-DQ2.5 transgenic mice, DONQ52 demonstrates favorable pharmacokinetics with high subcutaneous bioavailability, and blocks immunity to gluten while not affecting systemic immunity. Our results thus provide a rationale for clinical testing of DONQ52 in CeD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuu Okura
- Translational Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Akihiko Mizoroki
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | | - Machiko Irie
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | | - Shunsuke Ito
- Translational Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Genki Nakamura
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Takesue
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yui Ozono
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Kenta Yamada
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Siok Wan Gan
- Chugai Pharmabody Research Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore
| | - Akira Hayasaka
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shinya Ishii
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Masaru Muraoka
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Nishiki Nagaya
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hino
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takayuki Nemoto
- Translational Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Taichi Kuramochi
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takuya Torizawa
- Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | | - Makoto Okazaki
- Chugai Pharmabody Research Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore
| | - Junichi Nezu
- R&D Portfolio Management Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ludvig M Sollid
- Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tomoyuki Igawa
- Translational Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morse BL, Karian V. Supporting the Young Adulthood Transitions in Women With Migraine. Nurs Womens Health 2023; 27:457-466. [PMID: 37804861 DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is a painful neurological disorder that disproportionately affects women and has a significant impact on quality of life. This article summarizes the critical role of women's health nurses in supporting young adult women with migraine during major life transitions. Nurses can advocate for workplace or school disability accommodations for women with migraine. Nurses can also support young adult women with migraine by providing education about available treatment that becomes available after an individual's 18th birthday. Women's health nurses can also provide counseling on healthy lifestyle habits to sustain through life transitions, such as guidance on safe alcohol consumption and wellness approaches to migraine management. Through these interventions, women's health nurses can help women with migraine to succeed personally, professionally, and academically while effectively managing migraine symptoms.
Collapse
|
8
|
Juhasz G, Gecse K, Baksa D. Towards precision medicine in migraine: Recent therapeutic advances and potential biomarkers to understand heterogeneity and treatment response. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 250:108523. [PMID: 37657674 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
After 35 years since the introduction of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD), we are living in the era of the second great revolution in migraine therapies. First, discoveries of triptans provided a breakthrough in acute migraine treatment utilizing bench-to-bedside research results on the role of serotonin in migraine. Next, the discovery of the role of neuropeptides, more specifically calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine attack led to the development of anti-CGRP therapies that are effective both in acute and preventive treatment, and are also able to reduce migraine-related burden. Here, we reviewed the most recent clinical studies and real-world data on available migraine-specific medications, including triptans, ditants, gepants and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Novel drug targets, such as PACAP and amylins were also discussed. To address the main challenges of migraine therapy, the high heterogeneity of people with migraine, the prevalent presence of various comorbid disorders, and the insufficient medical care of migraine patients were covered. Promising novel approaches from the fields of omics, blood and saliva biomarker, imaging and provocation studies might bring solutions for these challenges with the potential to identify further drug targets, distinguish more homogeneous patient subgroups, contribute to more optimal drug selection strategies, and detect biomarkers in association with headache features or predicting treatment efficacy. In the future, the combined analysis of data of different biomarker modalities with machine learning algorithms may serve precision medicine in migraine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Juhasz
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Kinga Gecse
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Daniel Baksa
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Personality and Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Suzuki K, Suzuki S, Shiina T, Haruyama Y, Fujita H, Funakoshi K, Hirata K. Could efficacy at 1 week after galcanezumab administration for patients with migraine predict responders at 3 months? A real world study. J Neurol 2023; 270:4377-4384. [PMID: 37219606 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11788-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In real-world studies, it is unclear whether galcanezumab has a significant effect in the first week after administration. METHODS We retrospectively assessed 55 high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine patients who received three galcanezumab doses. Mean changes in the numbers of weekly migraine days (WMDs) during month 1 and migraine days per month (MMDs) after 1-3 months of treatment were obtained. Clinical factors related to a ≥ 50% response rate (RR) at month 3 were analyzed. The prediction of ≥ 50% responders at month 3 using different weekly RRs at week 1 (W1) was evaluated. The RR at W1 was calculated with the following formula: RR (%) = 100 - [(WMDs at W1/baseline WMD) × 100]. RESULTS The number of MMDs significantly improved from baseline to 1, 2 and 3 months. The ≥ 50% RR was 50.9% at 3 months. The number of WMDs decreased significantly from baseline to week 1 (- 1.6 ± 1.7 days), week 2 (- 1.2 ± 1.6 days), week 3 (- 1.0 ± 1.3 days), and week 4 (- 1.1 ± 1.6 days) during month 1. The RR at W1 was largest (44.6 ± 42.2%). The ≥ 30%, ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% RRs at W1 were significantly predictive of a ≥ 50% RR at 3 months. Logistic regression analysis predicting a ≥ 50% RR at month 3 showed that the RR at W1 was the sole contributing factor. CONCLUSION In our study, galcanezumab showed a significant effect in the first week after administration, and the RR at W1 could predict the RR at 3 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
| | - Shiho Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Shiina
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Yasuo Haruyama
- Integrated Research Faculty for Advanced Medical Sciences, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Fujita
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Kei Funakoshi
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirata
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vogler B, Kuhn A, Mackenzie KD, Stratton J, Dux M, Messlinger K. The Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (Anti-CGRP) Antibody Fremanezumab Reduces Trigeminal Neurons Immunoreactive to CGRP and CGRP Receptor Components in Rats. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13471. [PMID: 37686275 PMCID: PMC10487893 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment with the anti-CGRP antibody fremanezumab is successful in the prevention of chronic and frequent episodic migraine. In preclinical rat experiments, fremanezumab has been shown to reduce calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) release from trigeminal tissues and aversive behaviour to noxious facial stimuli, which are characteristic pathophysiological changes accompanying severe primary headaches. To further decipher the effects of fremanezumab that underlie these antinociceptive effects in rats, immunohistochemistry and ELISA techniques were used to analyse the content and concentration of CGRP in the trigeminal ganglion, as well as the ratio of trigeminal ganglion neurons which are immunoreactive to CGRP and CGRP receptor components, 1-10 days after subcutaneous injection of fremanezumab (30 mg/kg) compared to an isotype control antibody. After fremanezumab treatment, the fraction of trigeminal ganglion neurons which were immunoreactive to CGRP and the CGRP receptor components calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and receptor activity modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) was significantly lowered compared to the control. The content and concentration of CGRP in trigeminal ganglia were not significantly changed. A long-lasting reduction in CGRP receptors expressed in trigeminal afferents may contribute to the attenuation of CGRP signalling and antinociceptive effects of monoclonal anti-CGRP antibodies in rats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Vogler
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany; (B.V.); (A.K.)
| | - Annette Kuhn
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany; (B.V.); (A.K.)
| | | | | | - Mária Dux
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Karl Messlinger
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany; (B.V.); (A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guerzoni S, Baraldi C, Castro FL, Cainazzo MM, Pani L. Galcanezumab for the treatment of chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: Real-world clinical evidence in a severely impaired patient population. Brain Behav 2023; 13:e2799. [PMID: 37208838 PMCID: PMC10275517 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody acting against the calcitonin gene-related peptide approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. The aim of this article is to explore its effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab in chronic migraine (CM) with medication overuse-headache (MOH). METHODS Seventy-eight patients were consecutively enrolled at the Modena headache center and followed up for 15 months. Visits were scheduled every 3 months, and the following variables were collected: the number of migraine days per month (MDM); the painkillers taken per month (PM); the number of days per month in which the patient took, at least, one painkiller; the six-item headache impact test; and the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) score. Demographic features of the analyzed sample were collected at the baseline and adverse events (AEs) were collected at every visit. RESULTS After 12 months, galcanezumab significantly reduced the MDM, the PM, the number of days on medication, the HIT-6 as well as the MIDAS scores (all p < .0001). The greatest amelioration was obtained in the first trimester of treatment. A higher MDM, a higher NRS score at the baseline, and a higher number of failed preventive treatments negatively predict the CM relief at the year of treatment. No serious AEs were registered and only one drop-out was due to AE. CONCLUSIONS Galcanezumab is effective and safe for the treatment of patients affected by CM and MOH. Patients with a higher impairment at the baseline may found less benefits with galcanezumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology‐Headache Center and Drug Abuse‐Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist MedicinesAOU Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- PhD School in Neurosciences, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Flavia Lo Castro
- Post‐Gradute School in Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Maria Michela Cainazzo
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology‐Headache Center and Drug Abuse‐Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist MedicinesAOU Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Luca Pani
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology‐Headache Center and Drug Abuse‐Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist MedicinesAOU Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of MiamiMiamiFloridaUSA
- VeraSciDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kaltseis K, Filippi V, Frank F, Eckhardt C, Schiefecker A, Broessner G. Monoclonal antibodies against CGRP (R): non-responders and switchers: real world data from an austrian case series. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:174. [PMID: 37118682 PMCID: PMC10142255 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03203-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assessement of the responder and non-responder rate to consecutive monoclonal CGRP-antibody (CGRP-mAb) treatment, the presence of side effects, analysis of predictors of response and loss-of-effectiveness evaluation over time. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis including 171 patients with episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), who received one, two or three different CGRP-mAbs. Non-response was defined as ≤ 50% reduction of monthly migraine days (MMDs) in EM and ≤ 30% reduction of MMDs in CM after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS 123 (71.9%) responded to the first mAb. Side effects led to treatment discontinuation in 9 (5.3%) patients. Of the 26 patients who did not respond to the first mAb or experienced a loss of efficacy over time, 11 (42.3%) responded to the second and two (28.6%) of 7 to the third monoclonal antibody. Poor response to therapy was associated with a higher monthly migraine frequency (p = 0.028), a higher number of prior preventive migraine therapies (p = 0.011) and medication overuse (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION Our findings support mAb-class switch in non-responders or in patients experiencing a loss of effectiveness. The use of a third CGRP-mAb could be beneficial for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kaltseis
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Vera Filippi
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Florian Frank
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christine Eckhardt
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alois Schiefecker
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gregor Broessner
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Asawavichienjinda T, Sathitratanacheewin S, Chokesuwattanaskul R. "Wearing-off" efficacy of CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231161261. [PMID: 36924253 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231161261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A new migraine prevention, CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), is injectable on a monthly or quarterly basis. In clinical practice, some patients reported that drug effectiveness does not last until the upcoming scheduled injection, a so-called "wearing-off" effect. We aimed to evaluate the wearing-off effect of the CGRP mAbs for migraine prevention in patients with different monthly migraine days. METHODS We conducted a literature search for studies that reported migraine frequency after CGRP monoclonal antibody administration from MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database from inception through February 2022. A meta-analysis, random-effects model was applied to assess the difference in migraine frequency between early and later weeks after medication to assess the presence of a wearing-off effect. Risk ratio was calculated to report the pooled treatment effect. RESULTS Four studies were entered for the analysis, comprising 2409 patients in randomized controlled trials. There was no association between CGRP mAbs and wearing-off effect in patients with galcanezumab with a pooled risk ratio of 1.29 (95% CI 0.73 to 2.28) compared to placebo group. However, there was an association between galcanezumab and wearing-off effect in patients with chronic migraine with a pooled risk ratio of 1.91 (95% CI 1.11 to 3.28) compared to placebo group. CONCLUSION In this meta-analysis, there was a wearing-off efficacy of galcanezumab but only in a small percentage of patients with chronic migraine in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanin Asawavichienjinda
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Seelwan Sathitratanacheewin
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shah T, Bedrin K, Tinsley A. Calcitonin gene relating peptide inhibitors in combination for migraine treatment: A mini-review. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1130239. [PMID: 37006413 PMCID: PMC10064089 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1130239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The discovery of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its role in migraine pathophysiology has led to advances in the treatment of migraine. Since 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved four monoclonal antibody (mab) therapies targeting either the CGRP ligand or receptor and 3 oral small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists. These targeted therapies have been shown to be safe and effective for either preventive or acute treatment of migraine in adults. Given their efficacy and tolerability profile, CGRP inhibitors have revolutionized the approach to migraine treatment. Theoretically, combining therapies within this therapeutic class could lead to more CGRP blockade and, subsequently, improved patient outcomes. There are providers currently combining CGRP therapies in clinical practice. However, limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of this practice. This mini-review provides a summary of available data and poses important considerations when combining CGRP therapies for migraine treatment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Raffaelli B, Terhart M, Fitzek MP, Lange KS, Mecklenburg J, Overeem LH, Siebert A, Storch E, Reuter U. Change of CGRP Plasma Concentrations in Migraine after Discontinuation of CGRP-(Receptor) Monoclonal Antibodies. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15010293. [PMID: 36678920 PMCID: PMC9861447 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Discontinuation of treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) pathway leads to an increase in migraine frequency. We aimed to assess changes in free and total CGRP plasma concentrations after the discontinuation of CGRP(-receptor) mAbs. This prospective analysis included 59 patients with migraine (n = 25 erenumab, n = 25 galcanezumab, n = 9 fremanezumab) who discontinued mAbs after ≥8 months of treatment. Patients were visited at the time of the last mAb injection (V1) and 16 weeks later (V2). For control, 30 migraine patients without preventive drug therapy were included. We measured free CGRP plasma concentrations in the erenumab and fremanezumab group and total CGRP concentrations in the galcanezumab group. Free CGRP plasma concentrations did not change after treatment discontinuation [erenumab: V1 31.2 pg/mL (IQR 25.8−45.6), V2 30.3 pg/mL (IQR 22.9−47.6), p = 0.65; fremanezumab V1 29.4 pg/mL (IQR 16.4−61.9), V2 34.4 (19.2−62.0), p = 0.86]. Controls had similar CGRP values of 32.6 pg/mL (IQR 21.3−44.6). Total CGRP concentrations in the galcanezumab group were 5439.3 pg/mL (2412.7−6338.1) at V1, and decreased to 1853.2 pg/mL (1136.5−3297.0) at V2 (p < 0.001). Cessation of treatment with CGRP(-R) mAbs did not have an impact on the free-circulating CGRP concentrations. Total CGRP decreased significantly after three months of treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)30-450-660888; Fax: +49-(0)30-450-560932
| | - Maria Terhart
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Mira Pauline Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kristin Sophie Lange
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jasper Mecklenburg
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anke Siebert
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Storch
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Galcanezumab Effects on Migraine Severity and Symptoms in Japanese Patients with Episodic Migraine: Secondary Analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial. Neurol Ther 2022; 12:73-87. [PMID: 36266558 PMCID: PMC9837349 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00410-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide, is a preventive migraine treatment. In global, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, galcanezumab reduced migraine headache severity and the frequency of migraine headaches associated with nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia, prodromal symptoms, or aura. We report secondary analyses from a Japanese phase 2 trial that assessed the effect of galcanezumab on migraine headache severity, frequency of migraine-associated symptoms, and frequency of migraine headaches during menstrual periods in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. METHODS Adults with migraine (International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition; 4-14 migraine headache days/month) were randomized (2:1:1) to a monthly placebo (n = 230), 120 mg galcanezumab (240 mg loading dose; n = 115), or 240 mg galcanezumab (n = 114) for 6 months (double-blind). Patients recorded migraine headache days, severity, and symptoms in an electronic diary. Changes from baseline were analyzed (mixed model for repeated measures). RESULTS Both galcanezumab doses significantly reduced the number of monthly moderate-to-severe and severe migraine headache days compared with placebo, overall (difference in least-squares mean change from baseline, 120 mg/240 mg versus placebo: moderate-to-severe, -1.9/-1.8 days; severe: -0.4/-0.4 days) and in each month; mean severity score was significantly reduced in the 240 mg group. Both galcanezumab doses significantly reduced the number of migraine headache days with nausea/vomiting (-1.1/-1.0 days), photophobia/phonophobia (-2.3/-1.7 days), prodromal symptoms (-0.7/-0.8 days), and aura (-0.7/-0.7 days). In most cases, the proportion of migraine headache days with these symptoms was reduced by galcanezumab. Both galcanezumab doses reduced the number of migraine headache days occurring during menstrual periods (n = 269; -0.8/-0.9 days). CONCLUSION Once-monthly galcanezumab significantly reduced the frequency of migraine headache days with moderate-to-severe or severe headache, migraine headache days with migraine-associated symptoms, and migraine headache days during menstrual periods in Japanese patients with episodic migraine, consistent with results from global studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02959177).
Collapse
|
17
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lanfranco Pellesi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Calcitonin gene-related peptide and neurologic injury: An emerging target for headache management. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 220:107355. [PMID: 35785661 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a 37-amino acid neuropeptide known to be involved in the trigeminovascular system and to function as a potent vasodilator. Although it has emerged as a viable target for headache management with targeted treatments developed for migraine, a highly disabling neurovascular disorder, less is known about CGRP's role in other neurologic conditions such as traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage. The literature has shown that during these injury cascades, CGRP receptors are modulated in varying ways. Therefore, CGRP or its receptors might be viable targets to manage secondary injuries following acute brain injury. In this review, we highlight the pathophysiology of the CGRP pathway and its relation to migraine pathogenesis. Using these same principles, we assess the existing preclinical data for CGRP and its role in acute brain injury. The findings are promising, and set the basis for further work, with specific focus on the therapeutic benefit of CGRP modulation following neurologic injury.
Collapse
|
19
|
López‐Bravo A, Oliveros‐Cid A, Sevillano‐Orte L. Treatment satisfaction with calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies as a new patient-reported outcome measure: A real-life experience in migraine. Acta Neurol Scand 2022; 145:669-675. [PMID: 35243611 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate treatment satisfaction with galcanezumab as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in migraine. METHODS Patients with ≥8 headache days/month that had failed at ≥3 medications were included. Demographic and medical history were collected. Patient´s satisfaction (effectiveness, safety, convenience, and global satisfaction [GS]) was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version 1.4 (TSQM-1.4©). RESULTS We included 30 patients with migraine (76.7% chronic migraine). After 12 weeks of galcanezumab treatment, median monthly headache days (MHDs) decreased 11.5 (IQR 14.0) and median monthly migraine days (MMDs) 9.0 (IQR 7.5); at 24 weeks, the change was 15.0 (IQR 12.0) and 8.0 days (IQR 6.0). HIT-6 score decreased from 68.0 (IQR 7.5) to 54.0 (IQR 9.5) at 12 weeks (p < .001) and to 52.0 (IQR12.0) at 24 weeks (p < .001) and MIDAS from 60.0 (IQR 62.7) to 25.5 (IQR 41.2, p = .004) and 7.0 (IQR 18.5, p < .001), respectively. TSQM-1.4© at 12 weeks was higher compared to other preventive therapy in effectiveness (80.6/50.4, p < .001), convenience (83.3/66.7, p = .001), and GS (78.6/50.0, p < .001). These rates of satisfaction were similar at 24 weeks of galcanezumab treatment. Reductions in HIT-6 (r = -.444, p = .014), MIDAS (r = -.423, p = .020), MMDs (r = -.515, p = .004), and MHDs (r = -.477, p = .008) were associated significantly with GS at 12 weeks. This correlation was significantly associated with changes in HIT-6 and MHDs at 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that migraine patients receiving galcanezumab are significantly more satisfied compared to other preventive therapies, associating treatment GS with meaningful reductions in frequency, impact, and disability caused by migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba López‐Bravo
- Department of Neurology Hospital Reina Sofia Navarra Spain
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón) Zaragoza Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Basedau H, Sturm LM, Mehnert J, Peng KP, Schellong M, May A. Migraine monoclonal antibodies against CGRP change brain activity depending on ligand or receptor target - an fMRI study. eLife 2022; 11:77146. [PMID: 35604755 PMCID: PMC9126581 DOI: 10.7554/elife.77146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against calcitonin gene-related peptides (CGRP) are novel treatments for migraine prevention. Based on a previous functional imaging study which investigated the CGRP receptor mAb (erenumab), we hypothesized that (i) the CGRP ligand mAb galcanezumab would alter central trigeminal pain processing; (ii) responders to galcanezumab treatment would show specific hypothalamic modulation in contrast to non-responders; and (iii) the ligand and the receptor antibody differ in brain responses. Methods: Using an established trigeminal nociceptive functional magnetic imaging paradigm, 26 migraine patients were subsequently scanned twice: before and 2–3 weeks after administration of galcanezumab. Results: We found that galcanezumab decreases hypothalamic activation in all patients and that the reduction was stronger in responders than in non-responders. Contrasting erenumab and galcanezumab showed that both antibodies activate a distinct network. We also found that pre-treatment activity of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN) and coupling between the STN and the hypothalamus covariates with the response to galcanezumab. Conclusions: These data suggest that despite relative impermeability of the blood-brain barrier for CGRP mAb, mAb treatment induces certain and highly specific brain effects which may be part of the mechanism of their efficacy in migraine treatment. Funding: This work was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of ERA-Net Neuron under the project code BIOMIGA (01EW2002 to AM) and by the German Research Foundation (SFB936-178316478-A5 to AM). The funding sources did not influence study conduction in any way. Clinical trial number: The basic science study was preregistered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/m2rc6).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hauke Basedau
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa-Marie Sturm
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Mehnert
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kuan-Po Peng
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlene Schellong
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arne May
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gérard AO, Merino D, Van Obberghen EK, Rocher F, Destere A, Lantéri-Minet M, Drici MD. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting drugs and Raynaud's phenomenon: a real-world potential safety signal from the WHO pharmacovigilance database. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:53. [PMID: 35505285 PMCID: PMC9066820 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01424-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is responsible for significant disability and societal burden. Recently, drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway raised new hopes. CGRP, a potent vasodilator, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of migraine attacks. The deficiency of CGRP is involved in Raynaud’s phenomenon, which consists of abnormal vasoconstriction of the digits. We aimed to assess the potential association of Raynaud’s phenomenon with CGRP-targeting drugs, analyzing real-world data from the World Health Organization (VigiBase®). Methods We queried all reports of Raynaud’s phenomenon involving a CGRP-targeting drug. We sought disproportionate reporting of Raynaud’s phenomenon with these drugs. For this purpose, we relied on the calculation of the Information Component (IC). A positive lower end of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the IC defines a statistically significant association. As migraine patients are prone to Raynaud’s phenomenon, we also calculated the IC of Raynaud’s phenomenon with CGRP-targeting drugs compared to 5HT1B/D agonists (triptans), and beta-blockers used in the treatment of migraine. Results Overall, 99 reports of Raynaud’s phenomenon involving CGRP-targeting drugs have been yielded in VigiBase®. The most reported CGRP-targeting drug was erenumab, with 56 reports (56.6%). The median time to onset was 84 days. No fatality was notified, but one patient suffered from gangrene and extremity necrosis. As a whole, CGRP-targeting drugs were significantly associated with Raynaud’s phenomenon, with an IC of 3.3 (95%CI: 3.0–3.5). There was a disproportionate reporting of Raynaud’s phenomenon with CGRP-targeting drugs compared to triptans (IC 0.4; 95%CI: 0.1–0.6) and to beta-blockers (IC 0.5; 95%CI: 0.2–0.7) as well. Conclusions There is a significant disproportionality signal of Raynaud’s phenomenon with CGRP-targeting. This signal stands out when CGRP-targeting drugs are compared to other drugs used in patients with migraine. This study is limited by missing data in pharmacovigilance reports. CGRP-targeting drugs may be subject to Weber effect and reporting bias. Nonetheless, CGRP blockade might be the last straw that disrupts the physiological balance of vascular response in patients at-risk of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Pending further data regarding vascular safety of CGRP-targeting drugs, caution is warranted in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre O Gérard
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance Center of Nice, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France.,Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France.,Laboratory of Molecular Physio Medicine (LP2M), UMR 7370, CNRS, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Diane Merino
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance Center of Nice, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Elise K Van Obberghen
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, University Hospital Center of Nice and Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France
| | - Fanny Rocher
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance Center of Nice, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Destere
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance Center of Nice, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Michel Lantéri-Minet
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, University Hospital Center of Nice and Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France.,Migraine and Trigeminal Pain, UMR 1107, INSERM, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Milou-Daniel Drici
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance Center of Nice, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cohen F, Yuan H, Silberstein SD. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies and Antagonists in Migraine: Current Evidence and Rationale. BioDrugs 2022; 36:341-358. [PMID: 35476215 PMCID: PMC9043885 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00530-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37 amino-acid neuropeptide found mostly in peptidergic sensory C-fibers, has been suggested to be implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine, which is one of the most common neurological disorders seen in medical practice, affecting almost 16% of the US population. While previously thought to be a vascular condition, migraine attacks are the result of neurogenic inflammation and peripheral/central sensitization through dysfunctional activation of the trigeminovascular system. To date, two classes of therapeutic agents have been developed to interrupt the function of CGRP: CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule antagonists (gepants). There are currently four CGRP-targeted mAbs and three gepants that are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of migraine. Multiple phase II and III studies have established the efficacies and tolerability of these treatments. Previously, we reviewed the fundamental role of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Here, we discuss in depth the clinical evidence (randomized controlled trials and real-world studies), safety, and tolerability of CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants for treating migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cohen F, Yuan H, DePoy EMG, Silberstein SD. The Arrival of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:922-930. [PMID: 35426060 PMCID: PMC9294119 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01230-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Remarkable advancements have been made in the field of migraine pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy over the past decade. Understanding the molecular mechanism of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has led to the discovery of a novel class of drugs, CGRP functional blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), for migraine prevention. CGRP is a neuropeptide inherently involved in migraine physiology where its receptors are found dispersed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. CGRP-targeted mAbs are effective in the preventive treatment of both chronic and episodic migraine. The advantages of mAbs over oral migraine preventives are numerous. Favorable attributes of the mAbs include high affinity and selectivity for CGRP molecular targets, long-circulating plasma half-lives, and limited risk for nonspecific hepatic and renal toxicity. This pharmacological profile leads to fewer off-target (side) effects and drug-drug interactions rendering mAbs an attractive alternative to traditional small molecule therapies, especially for the preventive treatment of migraine. MAbs display minimal drug interaction thus are excellent for patients prescribed with multiple medications. However, the long-term safety of CGRP blockade is incompletely known, and CGRP mAbs use should be avoided during pregnancy. CGRP mAbs represent a radical shift in preventing chronic and episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - E M G DePoy
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Iannone LF, Fattori D, Benemei S, Chiarugi A, Geppetti P, De Cesaris F. Predictors of Sustained Response and Effects of Anti-CGRP Antibodies Discontinuation and Reinitiation in Resistant Chronic Migraine. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:1505-1513. [PMID: 35098620 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for migraine prophylaxis suggest stopping medication after 6-12 months to reevaluate treatment appropriateness. The Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) set a mandatory regulation to stop anti-CGRP (calcitonin gene related protein) pathway monoclonal antibody (anti-CGRP mAbs) treatments for 3 months after 12-months of treatment. Herein, we assess the effects of discontinuation and retreatment of anti-CGRP mAbs in resistant chronic migraine patients, evaluating predictive factors of sustained response. METHODS A monocentric prospective cohort study, enrolling 44 severe (resistant to ≥3 preventive treatments) chronic migraine patients (all with medication-overuse), treated with erenumab (54.5%) or galcanezumab (45.5%) for 12-months, who discontinued treatment for three months and then restarted for one month. RESULTS Overall, patients reported an increasing deteriorating trend during the three months of discontinuation. Monthly migraine days (MMDs), number of analgesics, days with at least one analgesic used, a ≥50% response rate (reduction in MMDs), and MIDAS and HIT-6 total scores, remained lower than baseline values, but increased if compared to month-12 of treatment. All outcome measures decreased again during the month of retreatment. Patients who did not meet criteria for restarting treatment had lower MIDAS (p=0.03) and HIT-6 (p=0.01) scores at baseline and better outcome measures during discontinuation compared to patients who restarted treatment. CONCLUSIONS In most patients, the 3-month discontinuation of anti-CGRP mAbs resulted in progressive migraine deterioration that was rapidly reverted by retreatment. However, one-fourth of patients, who reported better quality of life indices before treatment, showed a sustained benefit during discontinuation and did not need retreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Fattori
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Benemei
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Chiarugi
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cesaris
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vernieri F, Brunelli N, Messina R, Costa CM, Colombo B, Torelli P, Quintana S, Cevoli S, Favoni V, d'Onofrio F, Egeo G, Rao R, Filippi M, Barbanti P, Altamura C. Discontinuing monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP pathway after one-year treatment: an observational longitudinal cohort study. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:154. [PMID: 34922444 PMCID: PMC8903705 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01363-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Monoclonal antibodies anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (mAbs anti-CGRP) pathway are effective and safe on migraine prevention. However, some drug agencies limited these treatments to one year due to their high costs. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of discontinuing mAbs anti-CGRP on monthly migraine days (MMDs) and disability in high-frequency episodic (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients. Methods This observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted at 10 Italian headache centres. Consecutive adult patients were followed-up for three months (F-UP1–3) after discontinuation of a one-year erenumab/galcanezumab treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in F-UP MMDs. Secondary endpoints included variation in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), monthly acute medication intake (MAMI), and HIT-6 scores. We also assessed from F-UP1 to 3 the ≥50% response rate, relapse rate to CM, and recurrence of Medication Overuse (MO). Results We enrolled 154 patients (72.1% female, 48.2 ± 11.1 years, 107 CM, 47 HFEM); 91 were treated with erenumab, 63 with galcanezumab. From F-UP1 to F-UP3, MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 progressively increased but were still lower at F-UP3 than baseline (Friedman’s analysis of rank, p < .001). In the F-UP1–3 visits, ≥50% response rate frequency did not differ significantly between CM and HFEM patients. However, the median reduction in response rate at F-UP3 was higher in HFEM (− 47.7% [25th, − 79.5; 75th,-17.0]) than in CM patients (− 25.5% [25th, − 47.1; 75th, − 3.3]; Mann-Whitney U test; p = .032). Of the 84 baseline CM patients who had reverted to episodic migraine, 28 (33.3%) relapsed to CM at F-UP1, 35 (41.7%) at F-UP2, 39 (46.4%) at F-UP3. Of the 64 baseline patients suffering of medication overuse headache ceasing MO, 15 (18.3%) relapsed to MO at F-UP1, 26 (31.6%) at F-UP2, and 30 (42.3%, 11 missing data) at F-UP3. Lower MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 and higher response rate in the last month of therapy characterized patients with ≥50% response rate at F-UP1 and F-UP3 (Mann-Whitney U test; consistently p < .01). Conclusion Migraine frequency and disability gradually increased after mAbs anti-CGRP interruption. Most patients did not relapse to MO or CM despite the increase in MMDs. Our data suggest to reconsider mAbs anti-CGRP discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Messina
- Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Neurophysiology Units, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University 'Vita e Salute', Milan, Italy
| | - Carmelina Maria Costa
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Neurophysiology Units, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University 'Vita e Salute', Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Torelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma and Neurology Unit, AOU di Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Simone Quintana
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma and Neurology Unit, AOU di Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | - Renata Rao
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Neurophysiology Units, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University 'Vita e Salute', Milan, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.,San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Igarashi H, Shibata M, Ozeki A, Day KA, Matsumura T. Early Onset and Maintenance Effect of Galcanezumab in Japanese Patients with Episodic Migraine. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3555-3564. [PMID: 34815708 PMCID: PMC8605884 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s326905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to extensively evaluate the onset and maintenance effect of galcanezumab compared with placebo for the prevention of episodic migraine in Japanese patients. Patients and Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted between December 2016 and January 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02959177). Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with episodic migraine were randomized to receive a monthly injection of galcanezumab (120 mg: N = 115, 240 mg: N = 114) or placebo (N = 230) for 6 months. Outcome measures included onset of effect at weekly and daily intervals—assessed by change from baseline in the number of migraine headache days and the proportion of patients with migraine headache—with galcanezumab versus placebo. To further confirm the onset and maintenance effect, the 50% response rate was also evaluated. Results The mean change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days was significantly reduced with galcanezumab (–0.97 days) compared with placebo (–0.10 days) at week 1 (p ≤ 0.0001), which was maintained at all subsequent weeks up to week 4 (all p ≤ 0.0001 vs placebo). A significantly smaller proportion of galcanezumab-treated patients had migraine headache compared with placebo-treated patients at day 1 after the first injection (13.6% vs 31.4%, respectively; p ≤ 0.0001), which was also maintained at all subsequent days during the first week after the first injection. Furthermore, the 50% response rate was significantly higher with galcanezumab compared with placebo from week 1 through month 6. Conclusion The onset of the migraine preventive effect of galcanezumab was rapid compared with placebo, starting from day 1 after the first injection in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. The effect was maintained during the first week and first month, and throughout 6 months of monthly injections of galcanezumab. Galcanezumab is a promising preventive treatment in Japanese patients with episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisaka Igarashi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fujitsu Clinic, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Mamoru Shibata
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ailani J, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Guo H, Miceli R, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM. Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:695-706. [PMID: 34407343 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2035908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist that is being investigated for the preventive treatment of migraine. METHODS In a phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults with 4 to 14 migraine days per month in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a once-daily dose of oral atogepant (10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the mean number of migraine days per month across the 12 weeks. Secondary end points included headache days per month, a reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the 3-month average of migraine days per month, quality of life, and scores on the Activity Impairment in Migraine-Diary (AIM-D). RESULTS A total of 2270 participants were screened, 910 were enrolled, and 873 were included in the efficacy analysis; 214 were assigned to the 10-mg atogepant group, 223 to the 30-mg atogepant group, 222 to the 60-mg atogepant group, and 214 to the placebo group. The mean number of migraine days per month at baseline ranged from 7.5 to 7.9 in the four groups. The changes from baseline across 12 weeks were -3.7 days with 10-mg atogepant, -3.9 days with 30-mg atogepant, -4.2 days with 60-mg atogepant, and -2.5 days with placebo. The mean differences from placebo in the change from baseline were -1.2 days with 10-mg atogepant (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.8 to -0.6), -1.4 days with 30-mg atogepant (95% CI, -1.9 to -0.8), and -1.7 days with 60-mg atogepant (95% CI, -2.3 to -1.2) (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). Results for the secondary end points favored atogepant over placebo with the exceptions of the AIM-D Performance of Daily Activities score and the AIM-D Physical Impairment score for the 10-mg dose. The most common adverse events were constipation (6.9 to 7.7% across atogepant doses) and nausea (4.4 to 6.1% across atogepant doses). Serious adverse events included one case each of asthma and optic neuritis in the 10-mg atogepant group. CONCLUSIONS Oral atogepant once daily was effective in reducing the number of migraine days and headache days over a period of 12 weeks. Adverse events included constipation and nausea. Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the effect and safety of atogepant for migraine prevention. (Funded by Allergan; ADVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03777059.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ailani
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| | - Richard B Lipton
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| | - Hua Guo
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| | - Rosa Miceli
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| | - Lawrence Severt
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| | - Michelle Finnegan
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| | - Joel M Trugman
- From MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (J.A.); Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, New York (R.B.L.); the National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London (P.J.G.); the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (P.J.G.); and AbbVie, Madison, NJ (H.G., R.M., L.S., M.F., J.M.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mavridis T, Deligianni CI, Karagiorgis G, Daponte A, Breza M, Mitsikostas DD. Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting CGRP: From Clinical Studies to Real-World Evidence-What Do We Know So Far? Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14070700. [PMID: 34358126 PMCID: PMC8308667 DOI: 10.3390/ph14070700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Now more than ever is the time of monoclonal antibody use in neurology. In headaches, disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments existed only for symptomatic management of migraines (i.e., triptans), while the standard prophylactic anti-migraine treatments consist of non-specific and repurposed drugs that share limited safety profiles and high risk for interactions with other medications, resulting in rundown adherence rates. Recent advances in headache science have increased our understanding of the role of calcitonin gene relate peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) pathways in cephalic pain neurotransmission and peripheral or central sensitization, leading to the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or small molecules targeting these neuropeptides or their receptors. Large scale randomized clinical trials confirmed that inhibition of the CGRP system attenuates migraine, while the PACAP mediated nociception is still under scientific and clinical investigation. In this review, we provide the latest clinical evidence for the use of anti-CGRP in migraine prevention with emphasis on efficacy and safety outcomes from Phase III and real-world studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros Mavridis
- 1st Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.D.); (M.B.); (D.D.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-694-149-2121
| | | | | | - Ariadne Daponte
- 1st Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.D.); (M.B.); (D.D.M.)
| | - Marianthi Breza
- 1st Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.D.); (M.B.); (D.D.M.)
| | - Dimos D. Mitsikostas
- 1st Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.D.); (M.B.); (D.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhao X, Xu X, Li Q. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 2021; 268:2364-2376. [PMID: 32006159 PMCID: PMC8217057 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab in the prophylactic treatment of adult migraine. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identity randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the decline in the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs). Secondary outcomes included the reduction of monthly acute migraine‑specific medication days (MSMDs), the number of participants showing a reduction in MMDs from baseline of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100%, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and the number of participants developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to galcanezumab. We calculated the mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for these outcomes. RESULTS Among the five included trials, galcanezumab given at doses of 120, 150, 240, and 300 mg was superior to placebo for both MMDs and secondary outcomes. The degree of AEs in all group was mild. Notably, no significant differences were found in the occurrence of AEs and ADAs between the galcanezumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSION Galcanezumab is a safe and effective treatment for adult patients with episodic and chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaolin Xu
- Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| | - Qingyun Li
- Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schwedt TJ, Kuruppu DK, Dong Y, Standley K, Yunes-Medina L, Pearlman E. Early onset of effect following galcanezumab treatment in patients with previous preventive medication failures. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:15. [PMID: 33765912 PMCID: PMC7992932 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01230-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and is indicated for the preventive treatment of migraine. Galcanezumab demonstrated early onset of effect in patients with migraine but it is unknown whether the same holds true for patients who have not benefited from multiple prior migraine preventives. Methods Patients with episodic or chronic migraine from a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study (CONQUER) who had 2 to 4 migraine preventive medication category failures in the past 10 years were randomized 1:1 to placebo (N = 230) or galcanezumab 120 mg/month (240 mg loading dose; N = 232). In this post-hoc analysis, change from baseline in number of monthly and weekly migraine headache days was assessed. Monthly onset of effect was the earliest month at which significant improvement with galcanezumab compared to placebo was achieved and maintained at all subsequent months. Weekly onset was the initial week at which statistical separation was achieved and maintained at all subsequent weeks during that month. Proportion of patients with migraine headache days in the first week of treatment, and patients achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% response by month and week were also assessed. Results Galcanezumab-treated patients had a significantly greater reduction in monthly migraine headache days starting at month 1, which remained significant for all subsequent months compared to placebo (all p ≤ 0.0001, month 1 mean change from baseline: placebo − 0.7; galcanezumab − 4.0). Weekly migraine headache days was significantly reduced in galcanezumab-treated patients starting at week 1 and continued for each subsequent week of month 1 compared to placebo (all p < 0.01, week 1 mean change from baseline: placebo − 0.2; galcanezumab − 1.1). A significantly smaller percentage of patients had a migraine headache on the first day after galcanezumab treatment compared to placebo (28.4% vs 39.2%) and at each subsequent day during week 1 (all p < 0.05). A greater proportion of galcanezumab-treated patients achieved ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% response at months 1–3 (all p < 0.05) and at weeks 1–4 of month 1 compared to placebo (all p < 0.01). Conclusion Galcanezumab showed early onset of effect beginning the day after treatment initiation in patients who had not previously benefited from migraine preventive treatments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03559257. Registered 18 June 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yan Dong
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Onset, Maintenance, and Cessation of Effect of Galcanezumab for Prevention of Migraine: A Narrative Review of Three Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. Adv Ther 2021; 38:1614-1626. [PMID: 33544305 PMCID: PMC7932975 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01632-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide, is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. It is self-administered once monthly as a subcutaneous injection. This paper describes the time course of effect of galcanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Methods Data were based on three double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies. Patients (1773 episodic and 1113 chronic) were randomized (2:1:1) to monthly doses of placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg with a 240 mg loading dose, or galcanezumab 240 mg (January 2016–March 2017). Onset of effect was determined using a sequential analysis approach based on earliest time point at which galcanezumab achieved and subsequently maintained statistical superiority to placebo. Maintenance of effect was a comparison of the percentages of galcanezumab- and placebo-treated patients with maintenance of at least 50% response at the individual patient level. Cessation of effect was determined during a 4-month post-treatment period on the basis of change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days. Results Galcanezumab led to a lower percentage of patients who had a migraine headache on the first day after injection, provided maintenance of effect throughout the duration of the double-blind treatment period, and gradually lost effect without signs of rebound headache throughout the post-treatment period in most patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Conclusion Galcanezumab is a novel preventive therapeutic option for adult patients with migraine that has early onset of action, maintenance of effect, and gradual reduction of effect upon treatment cessation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02614183 (EVOLVE-1); NCT02614196 (EVOLVE-2); NCT02614261 (REGAIN). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01632-x.
Collapse
|
32
|
Chiang CC, Arca KN, Dunn RB, Girardo ME, Quillen JK, Dodick DW, Starling AJ. Real-world efficacy, tolerability, and safety of ubrogepant. Headache 2021; 61:620-627. [PMID: 33547676 DOI: 10.1111/head.14062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the real-world efficacy, tolerability, and safety of ubrogepant in a tertiary headache center. BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine were established in phase 3 randomized controlled trials. However, there is no real-world data of patient experience with ubrogepant in a population in which the majority of patients have chronic migraine, multiple prior unsuccessful treatments, complex medical comorbidities, and concurrent use of other migraine-specific medications. METHOD This was a post-market cohort study conducted at Mayo Clinic Arizona. All patients prescribed ubrogepant were tracked and contacted 1-3 months after the prescription to answer a list of standardized questions. Demographic information and additional headache history were obtained from chart review. RESULTS We obtained eligible questionnaire responses from 106 patients. Chronic migraine accounted for 92/106 (86.8%) of the population. Complete headache freedom (from mild/moderate/severe to no pain) and headache relief (from moderate/severe to mild/no pain or mild to no pain) for ≥75% of all treated attacks at 2 hours after taking ubrogepant were achieved in 20/105 (19.0%) and 50/105 (47.6%) patients, respectively. A total of 33/106 (31.1%) patients reported being "very satisfied" with ubrogepant. Adverse events were reported in 42/106 (39.6%) patients, including fatigue in 29/106 (27.4%), dry mouth in 8/106 (7.5%), nausea/vomiting in 7/106 (6.6%), constipation in 5/106 (4.7%), dizziness in 3/106 (2.8%), and other adverse events in 7/106 (6.6%). Predictive factors for being a "good responder" to ubrogepant, defined as headache relief for ≥75% of all treated attacks at 2 hours after taking ubrogepant, included migraine with aura, episodic migraine, <5 prior unsuccessful preventive or acute treatment trials. Additionally, prior treatment responses to a CGRP monoclonal antibody and onabotulinumtoxinA injections are predictive of treatment responses and patient satisfaction to ubrogepant. For the 62/106 (58.5%) patients concurrently using a CGRP monoclonal antibody, there was no difference in the "good responder" rate or adverse event rate compared to those who were not on a CGRP monoclonal antibody, though the rate of moderate, as opposed to mild adverse events was higher, 11/62 (47.8%) versus 3/44 (17.6%), p = 0.048. Additionally, 16 patients had a history of significant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases. No severe adverse events were reported in any patient. CONCLUSION Our study confirms and extends the efficacy profile and tolerability of ubrogepant in a real-world tertiary headache clinic and identifies factors that may predict efficacy. Adverse event rates were higher than reported in clinical trials. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ubrogepant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karissa N Arca
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Rachel B Dunn
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Marlene E Girardo
- Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Jaxon K Quillen
- Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Amaal J Starling
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cohen JM, Ning X, Kessler Y, Rasamoelisolo M, Campos VR, Seminerio MJ, Krasenbaum LJ, Shen H, Stratton J. Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:3. [PMID: 33413094 PMCID: PMC7791637 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01211-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention. Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumb have shown efficacy in clinical trials along with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Although erenumab is a human mAb and the others have been humanized to varying degrees, they all have the capacity to provoke immune reactions. The present review article aims to discuss the current relationship between mAbs targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP mAbs) and immunogenicity and their potential clinical implications. Findings The incidence of patients developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), their titer, and clinical significance are highly variable and depend on a variety of different drug and patient factors. Neutralizing ADAs (NAbs) bind to and inhibit or reduce the pharmacologic activity of the biologic drug molecule, whereas non-neutralizing antibodies (Non-NAbs) bind to the biologic drug molecule without affecting pharmacologic activity in an in vitro test, although pharmacokinetics and drug clearance may be affected. A direct comparison of immunogenicity data across clinical trials with different biologics is not possible due to a lack of standardized assays. Several phase 2, phase 3, and long-term studies evaluating CGRP mAbs for migraine prevention have reported immunogenicity data (5 studies each for eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab). Across these studies, prevalence of ADAs varied, ranging from < 1% to ~ 18%. Neutralizing ADAs were slightly less common, with a prevalence ranging from 0 to 12%. Adverse events related to ADA formation were rare. Conclusions As more CGRP mAb studies are conducted and more long-term follow-up data become available, evidence is increasing that immunogenicity rates of biologic therapies for migraine are low, and adverse events related to ADAs are rare. Taken together, these results add to the growing body of evidence for the safety and tolerability of this class of migraine medications.
Collapse
|
34
|
Galcanezumab: A Review in the Prevention of Migraine and Treatment of Episodic Cluster Headache. Drugs 2021; 80:893-904. [PMID: 32504377 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01329-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Galcanezumab (Emgality®) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), thereby inhibiting its physiological activity, with CGRP playing a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine and headache disorders. In pivotal phase 3 trials, recommended dosages of subcutaneous galcanezumab once monthly were significantly more effective than placebo as preventive therapy in adults with episodic (EVOLVE-1 and -2; over 6 months) or chronic (REGAIN; over 3 months) migraine (± aura), including in patients who had failed several prior preventive migraine drugs (CONQUER; over 3 months). The beneficial effects of galcanezumab preventive treatment in reducing the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs) and improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) were sustained during up to 1 year of treatment. In adults with episodic cluster headache, galcanezumab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the weekly frequency of cluster headache attacks across weeks 1-3 compared with placebo (primary endpoint), albeit during weeks 4-8, there was a convergence of results between these treatment groups. Although further evidence from the clinical setting is required to determine its long-term safety profile, given its convenient administration regimen, efficacy and short-term tolerability profile, monthly galcanezumab represents an important emerging option for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine (± aura) and the treatment of episodic cluster headache.
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Migraine is a common and disabling disorder affecting approximately 1.02 billion people worldwide. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as playing an important role in the pathophysiology of migraine and several migraine-specific therapies targeting the CGRP ligand or its receptor have been approved since 2018 for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. This review focuses on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability of galcanezumab, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Frerichs
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Dallas, TX 75390, USA.,Department of Neurology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave. Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Deborah I Friedman
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Dallas, TX 75390, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Urits I, Yilmaz M, Charipova K, Gress K, Bahrum E, Swett M, Berger AA, Kassem H, Ngo AL, Cornett EM, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. An Evidence-Based Review of Galcanezumab for the Treatment of Migraine. Neurol Ther 2020; 9:403-417. [PMID: 33010021 PMCID: PMC7606392 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-020-00214-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This is a comprehensive review of the current literature on the usage of galcanezumab for migraine treatment. It reviews the biology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and conventional treatment of migraines, then compares the literature available for galcanezumab with historical treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS Migraine is a common headache disorder and constitutes a significant source of distress from both a personal and societal perspective. Conventional treatment includes abortive and preventive treatment. Treatment options are limited and may be only partially or minimally effective in some of the population. Recent evidence points to metabolic changes in the brain as possible causes of migraine, via reduced available energy or a spiking need for it, resulting in a relative insufficiency. This leads to trigeminocervical complex (TCC) activation and a headache episode, modulated by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Galcanezumab (Emgality) is a monoclonal antibody targeting CGRP that is given in a monthly injection for the prevention of migraines. Its safety was previously shown in phase 1 and 2 trials, and recent phase 3 trials showed efficacy, with up to 50% reduction in monthly migraine days and improved functional capacity in migraineurs. Studies show that the drug is well tolerated and safe. Migraine headache is a common neurological syndrome that causes great pain and suffering. Treatment options today are limited. Galcanezumab does not prevent migraines, but it is effective in decreasing their frequency and length. It is also much better tolerated than the currently existing therapies. While it is unlikely to provide monotherapy for migraines, it is a novel therapy that may be added for cases of severe or frequent migraines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | - Kyle Gress
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ehab Bahrum
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael Swett
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amnon A Berger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hisham Kassem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Anh L Ngo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Pain Specialty Group, Newington, NH, USA
| | - Elyse M Cornett
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
- Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dawidowicz M, Kula A, Świętochowski P, Ostrowska Z. Assessment of the impact of PTGS1, PTGS2 and CYP2C9 polymorphisms on pain, effectiveness and safety of NSAID therapies. POSTEP HIG MED DOSW 2020. [DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.5497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX-1, COX-2) are enzymes that catalyze the first reaction in the arachidonic acid pathway. COXs are the therapeutic target for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Inhibition of COX enzymatic activity has an analgesic, anti-inflammatory and sometimes antiplatelet effect. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within genes encoding COX-1 and COX-2 (PTGS1, PTGS2) influence the risk of pain and their intensity in some diseases. They also affect the effectiveness of NSAID therapy in rheumatoid diseases. Moreover, the relationship between certain polymorphisms of PTGS2 and a higher risk of migraine and the development of aspirin resistance in the prophylaxis of cardiovascular diseases was demonstrated. The isoform of cytochrome P450, CYP2C9 has a significant influence on the efficacy and safety of NSAID use. It is responsible for the metabolism and speed of removal of these drugs. The occurrence of some of its polymorphic forms is associated with a decrease in CYP2C9 enzymatic activity, leading to changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NSAIDs. The prolonged half-life and decrease in clearance of these drugs lead to serious side effects such as hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, anaphylactic reactions, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal incidents. Studies on polymorphisms of cyclooxygenases and CYP2C9 may improve the safety and efficacy of NSAIDs therapy by adjusting the dose to individual polymorphic variants, as well as expanding knowledge about the pathomechanism of inflammatory diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dawidowicz
- Department of Medical and Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia in Zabrze, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Kula
- Department of Medical and Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia in Zabrze, Poland
| | | | - Zofia Ostrowska
- Department of Medical and Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia in Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mathew PG, Krivitski D, Sharon R. Erenumab-Induced Severe Nausea Leading to Smoking Cessation: A Retrospective Case Series. Headache 2020; 60:2563-2569. [PMID: 33202039 DOI: 10.1111/head.13979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 08/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Erenumab is a novel treatment modality with a relatively benign and safe side effect profile, currently approved for the prevention of migraine headache. We present 3 cases with chronic migraine who are cigarette smokers were prescribed erenumab, and developed an intense smoking-induced nausea which eventually led to smoking cessation. METHODS A multicenter retrospective review of 3 cases with cigarette smoking, one of whom was also smoking marijuana, suffering from chronic migraine resistant to multiple preventive therapies was studied. All were prescribed monthly injections of erenumab 70 mg. Response in terms of headache frequency and intensity and smoking habits was obtained through medical record review. RESULTS Out of 3 patients, 2 reported reduced headache frequency and intensity. All patients developed severe nausea while smoking cigarettes after their first dose of erenumab, leading to smoking cessation. One patient co-smoked marijuana, which did not result in nausea after being treated. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of severe nausea secondary to erenumab administration and smoking cigarettes, which finally resulted in complete cigarette smoking cessation. As such, further study is indicated on the benefit of erenumab and other calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists in migraineurs who smoke to promote smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul G Mathew
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA, USA
| | - David Krivitski
- Department of General, Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel
| | - Roni Sharon
- Department of Neurology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, University of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Huang IH, Wu PC, Lee YH, Kang YN. Optimal treatment strategy of fremanezumab in migraine prevention: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sci Rep 2020; 10:18609. [PMID: 33122778 PMCID: PMC7596067 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75602-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Identifying the optimal fremanezumab treatment strategy is crucial in treating patients with migraines. The optimal strategy was investigated by assessing the cumulative 50% reduction rate (50%CRR), cumulative 75% reduction rate (75%CRR), reduction in the number of migraine days, treatment-related adverse events, and serious adverse events in patients treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly (225 mg), 675 mg monthly (675 mg), 900 mg monthly (900 mg), a single high dose of 675 mg (S675mg), 675 mg at baseline with 225 mg monthly (675/225 mg), and placebo. Biomedical databases were searched for randomized controlled trials on this topic, and data were individually extracted. Risk ratios and mean differences were used to present the pooled results. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the effects of the medication strategies of fremanezumab. Five trials (n = 3404) were used to form a six-node network meta-analysis. All fremanezumab medication strategies displayed significantly higher cumulative 50% reduction rates than the placebo. The SUCRA revealed that treatment with 675 mg yielded the highest 50%CRR value (mean rank = 2.5). S675 mg was the only treatment with significantly higher 75%CRR reduction rate than placebo, whereas the SUCRA for 225 mg displayed the highest mean rank (2.2). Moreover, 225 mg (mean rank = 2.2) and S675 mg (mean rank = 2.2) presented lower probabilities of serious adverse events. Collectively, S675mg and 225 mg exhibited the optimal balance between efficacy and safety within three months. Long-term efficacy and safety remain unclear, and future studies should further evaluate the long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Hsin Huang
- Department of General Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Chien Wu
- Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 111, Section 3, Xing-Long Road, Taipei, 11696, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Han Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-No Kang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 111, Section 3, Xing-Long Road, Taipei, 11696, Taiwan.
- Research Center of Big Data and Meta-Analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Al-Hassany L, Van Den Brink AM. Targeting CGRP in migraine: a matter of choice and dose. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19:712-713. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30282-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
41
|
Small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists: A new approach to the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. MEDICINE IN DRUG DISCOVERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medidd.2020.100053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
42
|
Berman G, Croop R, Kudrow D, Halverson P, Lovegren M, Thiry AC, Conway CM, Coric V, Lipton RB. Safety of Rimegepant, an Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonist, Plus CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine. Headache 2020; 60:1734-1742. [PMID: 32799325 PMCID: PMC7496574 DOI: 10.1111/head.13930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective Evaluate the safety and tolerability of oral rimegepant when used for acute treatment concomitantly with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) ligand or receptor (CGRP mAb) for the preventive treatment of migraine. Background The efficacy of CGRP mAbs for the preventive treatment of migraine and the small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist rimegepant for acute treatment has been demonstrated in randomized controlled clinical trials. Over the past few years, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved 4 CGRP mAbs for the preventive treatment of migraine and 2 small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine. A previous case report of 2 patients receiving concomitant treatment with rimegepant and erenumab suggested that rimegepant may be safely used as acute treatment in patients who are also receiving a preventive regimen involving CGRP mAbs. We report here 13 additional patients with migraine who simultaneously used rimegepant and either erenumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab and assess the rate of on‐treatment adverse events (AEs). Methods This was a substudy nested within a multicenter, open‐label, long‐term safety study in adults with 2‐14 monthly migraine attacks of moderate to severe pain intensity. A subgroup experiencing 2‐8 monthly attacks and taking a stable dose of a CGRP mAb also took rimegepant 75 mg as needed up to once daily for acute treatment for 12 weeks. Results The 13 patients (11 women [85%]; mean age 49.9 years) enrolled in the substudy were being treated with CGRP mAbs (erenumab [n = 7], fremanezumab [n = 4], or galcanezumab [n = 2]). Mean (SD) time in the rimegepant treatment period was 9.6 (4.6) weeks. Mean (SD) 4‐week rimegepant exposure was 7.8 (5.5) doses; a total of 224 doses were taken. Five (38%) patients reported ≥1 on‐treatment AE. Of these, 2 (15%) patients had mild or moderate nasopharyngitis; no other AEs occurred in ≥2 patients. Three patients had AEs of mild or moderate severity that were considered potentially treatment‐related. No patients had serious AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, or aminotransferase levels >3× the upper limit of normal. Conclusion Rimegepant, when used as an oral acute treatment in patients receiving CGRP mAbs as preventive treatment, was well tolerated; no safety issues were identified. Studies involving larger patient populations are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Berman
- Clinical Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - David Kudrow
- California Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schoenen J, Manise M, Nonis R, Gérard P, Timmermans G. Monoclonal antibodies blocking CGRP transmission: An update on their added value in migraine prevention. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2020; 176:788-803. [PMID: 32758365 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The avenue of effective migraine therapies blocking calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) transmission is the successful outcome of 35 years of translational research. Developed after short-acting, the small antagonists of the CGRP receptor (the "gepants"), the monoclonal antibodies blocking CGRP or its receptor (CGRP/rec mAbs) have changed the paradigm in migraine treatment. Contrary to the classical acute medications like triptans or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with a transient effect, they act for long durations exclusively in the peripheral portion of the trigeminovascular system and can thus be assimilated to a durable attack treatment, unlike the classical preventives that chiefly act upstream on the central facets of migraine pathophysiology. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab have included collectively several thousands of patients, making them the most extensively studied class of preventive migraine treatments. Their results clearly indicate that CGRP/rec mAbs are significantly superior to placebo and have been comprehensively reviewed by Dodick [Cephalalgia 2019;39(3):445-458]. In this review we will briefly summarize the placebo-subtracted outcomes and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of these pivotal RCTs and analyze new and post-hoc studies published afterwards focusing on effect size, effect onset and sustainability, response in subgroups of patients, safety and tolerability, and cost-effectiveness. We will also summarize our limited real-world experience with one of the CGRP/rec mAbs. Although methodological differences and lack of direct comparative trials preclude any reliable comparison, the overall impression is that there are only minor differences in efficacy and tolerability profiles between the four monoclonals: the average placebo-subtracted 50% responder rates for reduction in migraine headaches are 21.4% in episodic migraine (NNTs: 4-5), 17.4% in chronic migraine (NNTs: 4-8). Patients with an improvement exceeding 50% are rare, chronic migraineurs with continuous headache are unlikely to be responders and migraine auras are not improved. The effect starts within the first week after administration and is quasi maximal at one month. It is sustained for long time periods and may last for several months after treatment termination. CGRP/rec mAbs are effective even after prior preventive treatment failures and in patients with medication overuse, but the effect size might be smaller. They significantly reduce disability and health care resource utilization. The adverse effect profile of CGRP/rec mAbs is close to that of placebo with few minor exceptions and despite concerns related to the safeguarding role of CGRP in ischemia, no treatment-related vascular adverse events have been reported to date. Putting the CGRP/rec mAbs in perspective with available preventive migraine drug treatments, their major advantage seems not to be chiefly their superior efficacy but their unprecedented efficacy over adverse event ratio. Regarding cost-effectiveness, preliminary pharmaco-economic analyses of erenumab suggest that it is cost-effective for chronic migraine compared to no treatment or to onabotulinumtoxinA, but likely not for episodic migraine unless attack frequency is high, indirect costs are considered and its price is lowered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
| | - M Manise
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - R Nonis
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - P Gérard
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - G Timmermans
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies as preventive and acute treatments for migraine-The monoclonal antibodies and gepants. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2020; 255:143-170. [PMID: 33008505 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) plays a pivotal role in migraine pathophysiology. Two types of CGRP function-blocking modalities, monoclonal antibodies, and small molecules (gepants), have been developed to target the CGRP ligands and CGRP receptors. Four CGRP monoclonal antibodies have received FDA approval for the prevention of migraine: erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab. Two gepants have been approved by the FDA for the acute treatment of migraine: ubrogepant and rimegepant. Multiple clinical trials of the CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants, and now some open-label long-term extension data, established their efficacy, safety, and tolerability. In this chapter, we summarize the major clinical trials, pharmacokinetic insights, safety and tolerability profiles, and real-world data (if available) of the CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cavestro C, Ferrero M, Mandrino S, Di Tavi M, Rota E. Novelty in Inflammation and Immunomodulation in Migraine. Curr Pharm Des 2020; 25:2919-2936. [PMID: 31686633 DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190709204107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a diffuse and disabling disease. Its pathophysiology is complex and involves both central and peripheral dysfunctions. OBJECTIVE This review will discuss the pathogenesis of migraine from the origin of the neuro-inflammatory theory, to the modern pathophysiological model and the latest therapies. METHODS PUBMED and EMBASE (up to May 2019) were searched for: migraine, inflammation, immunomodulation. An additional search was carried out from the bibliography of previous review articles. RESULTS Migraine was thought to be mainly a vascular disorder, according to the so-called "vascular theory". Based on animal models, a new hypothesis called "the neuro-inflammatory" was conceived at the end of the 20th century. The growing knowledge about the trigeminovascular system and its role in the inflammatory-pain pathway, allowed to identify other specific neurotransmitters, such as the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Peptide. Evidence was provided that the inflammatory-pain system could become sensitised and, due to this sensitisation, the pain could also perpetuate, even in the absence of any triggers of the migraine attack. At last, brain immune cells modification during cortical spreading depression in migraine was demonstrated, along with the existence and function of the glymphatic system. The better comprehension of the immune system abnormalities allowed the development of new immunomodulating drugs: the monoclonal antibodies against the CGRP or the CGRP receptor. Moreover, new insights into the molecular mechanism of CGRP, and the function of C-fibres and Aδ-fibres, highlighted the mechanism of action of Botulinum Toxin type A in the treatment of chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Cavestro
- Department of Neurology, Headache Centre, ASL CN2, Alba, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Mandrino
- Department of Neurology, Headache Centre, ASL CN2, Alba, Italy
| | - Marco Di Tavi
- Department of Neurology, Headache Centre, ASL CN2, Alba, Italy
| | - Eugenia Rota
- Neurology Unit, San Giacomo Hospital, Novi Ligure, ASL AL, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Baker B, Schaeffler B, Beliveau M, Rubets I, Pederson S, Trinh M, Smith J, Latham J. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of eptinezumab in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2020; 8:e00567. [PMID: 32155317 PMCID: PMC7064329 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Eptinezumab is a humanized mAb that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide and is under regulatory review for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine (EM, CM). It is important to determine whether exposures achieved with intravenous (IV) administration of eptinezumab achieve desired pharmacologic effects. Population pharmacokinetics, including dose- and exposure-response analyses, were performed using patient-level data from the eptinezumab clinical trial program with IV doses ranging from 10 to 1000 mg in pharmacokinetic analyses or 10 to 300 mg in phase 2/3 clinical studies in patients with EM or CM. Exposure-response analysis explored the relationship between eptinezumab exposure metrics and efficacy parameters including monthly migraine days. The pharmacokinetic profile of eptinezumab was characterized by rapid attainment of maximum plasma concentration (ie, end of IV administration) and a terminal half-life of 27 days. Covariate analysis found that patient characteristics had no clinically significant effects on pharmacokinetic parameters and were insufficient to influence dosing. Dose- and exposure-response analyses found exposure with single doses ≥100 mg was associated with greater efficacy compared with doses ≤30 mg and a plateau of effect between 100 and 300 mg. A saturable inhibitory Emax model found the exposure over 12 weeks produced by single-dose eptinezumab 100 and 300 mg exceeded the exposure estimates required to achieve 90% of the maximal efficacy (EC90 ). This pharmacokinetic analysis of eptinezumab supports dosing every 12 weeks with no adjustment for patient characteristics, including exposures associated with 100- or 300-mg doses producing optimal efficacy effects. The similar efficacy profiles support 100 mg as the lowest effective dose of eptinezumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Baker
- Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticalsBothellWAUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - MyMy Trinh
- Certara Strategic ConsultingMontrealCanada
| | - Jeff Smith
- Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticalsBothellWAUSA
| | - John Latham
- Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticalsBothellWAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Detke HC, Millen BA, Zhang Q, Samaan K, Ailani J, Dodick DW, Aurora SK. Rapid Onset of Effect of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Analysis of the EVOLVE Studies. Headache 2019; 60:348-359. [PMID: 31710104 PMCID: PMC7028148 DOI: 10.1111/head.13691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate onset of effect of galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine. Background Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to calcitonin gene‐related peptide and is indicated for preventive treatment of migraine. Design/Methods Data on the primary outcome measure were analyzed from 2 previously published double‐blind, Phase 3 studies (EVOLVE‐1 [N = 858] and EVOLVE‐2 [N = 915]) wherein adult patients with episodic migraine were randomized to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of galcanezumab 120 mg (with 240‐mg loading dose) or 240 mg or placebo for up to 6 months. Monthly onset of effect was defined as the earliest month at which galcanezumab achieved and subsequently maintained statistical superiority to placebo on the mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs). If onset occurred in Month 1, weekly onset was evaluated and defined as the earliest week at which galcanezumab statistically separated from placebo and maintained statistical separation for remaining weeks in that month. Day of onset of effect was also analyzed, as were monthly and weekly onset, for occurrence of ≥50% reduction from baseline in number of MHDs. Results For both studies, change from baseline in monthly MHDs showed a statistically significant separation of galcanezumab from placebo at Month 1 and each subsequent month (each P < .001). Analysis of the first month for both studies indicated onset of effect in the first week, with galcanezumab‐treated patients having significantly higher odds of having fewer MHDs in the first week (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for EVOLVE‐1, 2.71 [2.00, 3.66], and for EVOLVE‐2, 2.88 [2.16, 3.86]; both P < .001) and each subsequent week compared with placebo‐treated patients (P ≤ .004). Daily analysis showed onset of effect at Day 1 (first day after injection day). Galcanezumab also demonstrated superiority to placebo on occurrence of ≥50% reduction in MHDs starting at Week 1 (percentage of patients with 50% response in galcanezumab group vs placebo group for EVOLVE‐1, 54.3% vs 32.4% [P < .001], and for EVOLVE‐2, 59.4% vs 38.0% [P < .001]). Conclusion Rapid onset of preventive effect on the first day after injection of galcanezumab was confirmed in both studies of episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qi Zhang
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kielbasa W, Quinlan T. Population Pharmacokinetics of Galcanezumab, an Anti-CGRP Antibody, Following Subcutaneous Dosing to Healthy Individuals and Patients With Migraine. J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 60:229-239. [PMID: 31482569 PMCID: PMC6972493 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Galcanezumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G (IgG) monoclonal antibody (mAb) indicated for the prevention of migraine that binds to calcitonin gene‐related peptide. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed to characterize galcanezumab PK using data pooled from 7 clinical studies. Clinical studies included healthy individuals and patients with episodic or chronic migraine who were administered between 5 and 300 mg galcanezumab. The PK data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling. Galcanezumab concentration‐time data were described with a 1‐compartment model with first‐order absorption following subcutaneous administration and linear elimination. At the median body weight of 74 kg, the estimated population apparent clearance (CL/F) was 0.00785 L/h (34% IIV), the apparent volume of distribution was 7.33 L (34% IIV), and half‐life was 27 days. Patient body weight was found to have a modest effect of CL/F, with median galcanezumab concentrations being lower in the heaviest patients compared to the lightest patients, but this outcome was determined not to be clinically relevant in the context of model‐estimated random variability. Dosing adjusted for body weight is not warranted in adults. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, immunogenicity, renal/hepatic markers, and injection‐site location did not affect galcanezumab PK. In conclusion, galcanezumab exhibits PK parameters typical for an IgG mAb administered subcutaneously. The population PK model developed in this study demonstrates that galcanezumab exhibits linear PK that was not influenced in a clinically relevant manner by the patient factors evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Kielbasa
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Tonya Quinlan
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Erenumab and galcanezumab in chronic migraine prevention: effects after treatment termination. J Headache Pain 2019; 20:66. [PMID: 31159727 PMCID: PMC6734267 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-019-1018-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP pathway are safe and efficacious therapies for the prevention of migraine. In this study we assessed the effects of discontinuation of preventive erenumab and galcanezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine. Methods This retrospective pooled analysis included completers of the open-label extension study phase for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine with galcanezumab (NCT02614261; 9 months) and erenumab (NCT02174861; 12 months) in a single headache center. We compare migraine data until week 12 after open-label treatment completion, when patients did not have any pharmacological preventive medication, to study baseline values of the double-blind trial period, and to the last 4 weeks of the open-label extension. The assessment included changes in monthly migraine days, headache hours, days with severe headache and acute headache medication use. Results Data from 16 patients after galcanezumab (n = 9) and erenumab (n = 7) open-label treatment completion were analyzed. The mean number of monthly migraine days was 18.38 ± 3.74 at baseline, and 12.19 ± 4.53 in the last 4 weeks of the open-label extension (p < 0.001). Monthly migraine days remained significantly reduced compared to baseline during the entire 12-week observation period after open-label termination (p = 0.002), with a reduction of 5.38 ± 4.92 in weeks 1–4 (p = 0.001), 4.75 ± 4.15 in weeks 5–8 (p = 0.001), and 3.93 ± 5.45 in weeks 9–12 (p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in monthly migraine days between the 12 weeks after open-label termination and the last 4 weeks of the open-label phase (p = 0.228). All other analyses revealed numerical improvement through week 12 in comparison to baseline. Conclusions In this small, self-selected cohort, the results indicate a therapeutic effect of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CRGP pathway in chronic migraine prevention after treatment termination up to 12 weeks.
Collapse
|