1
|
Svane N, Pedersen ABV, Rodenberg A, Ozgür B, Saaby L, Bundgaard C, Kristensen M, Tfelt-Hansen P, Brodin B. The putative proton-coupled organic cation antiporter is involved in uptake of triptans into human brain capillary endothelial cells. Fluids Barriers CNS 2024; 21:39. [PMID: 38711118 DOI: 10.1186/s12987-024-00544-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triptans are anti-migraine drugs with a potential central site of action. However, it is not known to what extent triptans cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The aim of this study was therefore to determine if triptans pass the brain capillary endothelium and investigate the possible underlying mechanisms with focus on the involvement of the putative proton-coupled organic cation (H+/OC) antiporter. Additionally, we evaluated whether triptans interacted with the efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein (P-gp). METHODS We investigated the cellular uptake characteristics of the prototypical H+/OC antiporter substrates, pyrilamine and oxycodone, and seven different triptans in the human brain microvascular endothelial cell line, hCMEC/D3. Triptan interactions with P-gp were studied using the IPEC-J2 MDR1 cell line. Lastly, in vivo neuropharmacokinetic assessment of the unbound brain-to-plasma disposition of eletriptan was conducted in wild type and mdr1a/1b knockout mice. RESULTS We demonstrated that most triptans were able to inhibit uptake of the H+/OC antiporter substrate, pyrilamine, with eletriptan emerging as the strongest inhibitor. Eletriptan, almotriptan, and sumatriptan exhibited a pH-dependent uptake into hCMEC/D3 cells. Eletriptan demonstrated saturable uptake kinetics with an apparent Km of 89 ± 38 µM and a Jmax of 2.2 ± 0.7 nmol·min-1·mg protein-1 (n = 3). Bidirectional transport experiments across IPEC-J2 MDR1 monolayers showed that eletriptan is transported by P-gp, thus indicating that eletriptan is both a substrate of the H+/OC antiporter and P-gp. This was further confirmed in vivo, where the unbound brain-to-unbound plasma concentration ratio (Kp,uu) was 0.04 in wild type mice while the ratio rose to 1.32 in mdr1a/1b knockout mice. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that the triptan family of compounds possesses affinity for the H+/OC antiporter proposing that the putative H+/OC antiporter plays a role in the BBB transport of triptans, particularly eletriptan. Our in vivo studies indicate that eletriptan is subjected to simultaneous brain uptake and efflux, possibly facilitated by the putative H+/OC antiporter and P-gp, respectively. Our findings offer novel insights into the potential central site of action involved in migraine treatment with triptans and highlight the significance of potential transporter related drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Svane
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Rodenberg
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Burak Ozgür
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Biotherapeutic Discovery, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark
| | - Lasse Saaby
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Bioneer: FARMA, Bioneer A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Mie Kristensen
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peer Tfelt-Hansen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Birger Brodin
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dhayalan M, Wang W, Riyaz SUM, Dinesh RA, Shanmugam J, Irudayaraj SS, Stalin A, Giri J, Mallik S, Hu R. Advances in functional lipid nanoparticles: from drug delivery platforms to clinical applications. 3 Biotech 2024; 14:57. [PMID: 38298556 PMCID: PMC10825110 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-023-03901-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Since Doxil's first clinical approval in 1995, lipid nanoparticles have garnered great interest and shown exceptional therapeutic efficacy. It is clear from the licensure of two RNA treatments and the mRNA-COVID-19 vaccination that lipid nanoparticles have immense potential for delivering nucleic acids. The review begins with a list of lipid nanoparticle types, such as liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles. Then it moves on to the earliest lipid nanoparticle forms, outlining how lipid is used in a variety of industries and how it is used as a versatile nanocarrier platform. Lipid nanoparticles must then be functionally modified. Various approaches have been proposed for the synthesis of lipid nanoparticles, such as High-Pressure Homogenization (HPH), microemulsion methods, solvent-based emulsification techniques, solvent injection, phase reversal, and membrane contractors. High-pressure homogenization is the most commonly used method. All of the methods listed above follow four basic steps, as depicted in the flowchart below. Out of these four steps, the process of dispersing lipids in an aqueous medium to produce liposomes is the most unpredictable step. A short outline of the characterization of lipid nanoparticles follows discussions of applications for the trapping and transporting of various small molecules. It highlights the use of rapamycin-coated lipid nanoparticles in glioblastoma and how lipid nanoparticles function as a conjugator in the delivery of anticancer-targeting nucleic acids. High biocompatibility, ease of production, scalability, non-toxicity, and tailored distribution are just a meager of the enticing allowances of using lipid nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles. Due to the present constraints in drug delivery, more research is required to utterly realize the potential of lipid nanoparticles for possible clinical and therapeutic purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manikandan Dhayalan
- Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (Saveetha University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 077 India
- College of Public Health Sciences (CPHS), Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phyathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330 Thailand
| | - Wei Wang
- Beidahuang Industry Group General Hospital, Harbin, 150001 China
| | - S. U. Mohammed Riyaz
- Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (Saveetha University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 077 India
- PG & Research Department of Biotechnology, Islamiah College (Autonomous), Vaniyambadi, Tamil Nadu 635752 India
| | - Rakshi Anuja Dinesh
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072 Australia
| | - Jayashree Shanmugam
- Department of Biotechnology, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India
| | | | - Antony Stalin
- Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054 China
| | - Jayant Giri
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, India
| | - Saurav Mallik
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ruifeng Hu
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akerman S, Goadsby PJ, Romero-Reyes M. PACAP-38 related modulation of the cranial parasympathetic projection: A novel mechanism and therapeutic target in severe primary headache. Br J Pharmacol 2024; 181:480-494. [PMID: 37706270 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Little is known of how cranial autonomic symptoms (CAS) in cluster headache and migraine may contribute to their severe headache phenotype. This strong association suggests the involvement of the cranial parasympathetic efferent pathway. To investigate its contribution, we studied the role of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38), a potent sensory and parasympathetic neuropeptide, in modulating pre- and post-ganglionic cranial parasympathetic projection neurons, and their influence on headache-related trigeminal-autonomic responses. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Using PACAP-38 and PACAP-38 responsive receptor antagonists, electrophysiological, behavioural and facial neurovascular-blood flow was measured in rats to probe trigeminal- and parasympathetic-neuronal, periorbital thresholds and cranial-autonomic outcomes, as they relate to primary headaches. KEY RESULTS Sumatriptan attenuated the development of PACAP-38 mediated activation and sensitization of trigeminocervical neurons and related periorbital allodynia. PACAP-38 also caused activation and enhanced responses of dural-responsive pre-ganglionic pontine-superior salivatory parasympathetic neurons. Further, the PACAP-38 responsive receptor antagonists dissected a role of VPAC1 and PAC1 receptors in attenuating cranial-autonomic and trigeminal-neuronal responses to activation of the cranial parasympathetic projection, which requires post-ganglionic parasympathetic neurotransmission. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Given the prevailing view that sumatriptan acts to some degree via a peripheral mechanism, our data support that PACAP-38 mediated receptor activation modulates headache-related cranial-autonomic and trigeminovascular responses via peripheral and central components of the cranial parasympathetic projection. This provides a mechanistic rationale for the association of CAS with more severe headache phenotypes in cluster headache and migraine, and supports the cranial parasympathetic projection as a potential novel locus for treatment by selectively targeting PACAP-38 or PACAP-38 responsive VPAC1 /PAC1 receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Akerman
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- Headache Group, Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Research Centre (SPaRRC), Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marcela Romero-Reyes
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peng KP, Burish MJ. Management of cluster headache: Treatments and their mechanisms. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231196808. [PMID: 37652457 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231196808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of cluster headache is similar to that of other primary headache disorders and can be broadly divided into acute and preventive treatments. Acute treatments for cluster headache are primarily delivered via rapid, non-oral routes (such as inhalation, nasal, or subcutaneous) while preventives include a variety of unrelated treatments such as corticosteroids, verapamil, and galcanezumab. Neuromodulation is becoming an increasingly popular option, both non-invasively such as vagus nerve stimulation when medical treatment is contraindicated or side effects are intolerable, and invasively such as occipital nerve stimulation when medical treatment is ineffective. Clinically, this collection of treatment types provides a range of options for the informed clinician. Scientifically, this collection provides important insights into disease mechanisms. METHODS Two authors performed independent narrative reviews of the literature on guideline recommendations, clinical trials, real-world data, and mechanistic studies. RESULTS Cluster headache is treated with acute treatments, bridge treatments, and preventive treatments. Common first-line treatments include subcutaneous sumatriptan and high-flow oxygen as acute treatments, corticosteroids (oral or suboccipital injections) as bridge treatments, and verapamil as a preventive treatment. Some newer acute (non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation) and preventive (galcanezumab) treatments have excellent clinical trial data for episodic cluster headache, while other newer treatments (occipital nerve stimulation) have been specifically tested in treatment-refractory chronic cluster headache. Most treatments are suspected to act on the trigeminovascular system, the autonomic system, or the hypothalamus. CONCLUSIONS The first-line treatments have not changed in recent years, but new treatments have provided additional options for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan-Po Peng
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mark J Burish
- Department of Neurosurgery, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sadamoto Y. A Rare Case of Cluster Headache Occurring Exclusively During Sleep Without Autonomic Symptoms and Agitation: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e39021. [PMID: 37197304 PMCID: PMC10184054 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
As a primary headache disorder, cluster headache (CH) is a severe unilateral headache that recurs at certain times of the year, such as during season changes. It is characterized by autonomic symptoms, such as ipsilateral lacrimal and nasal discharge, as well as an inability to stay still during headache attacks. We report a rare case of CH in a 67-year-old male who presented with a severe right-sided headache lasting 30 minutes to one hour and occurring only during sleep. The headache resolved within five minutes after the subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan and was not accompanied by any autonomic symptoms or clear agitation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Prasad S, Mehadi A, Kaka N, Jhaveri S, Avanthika C, Patel N, Augustine I, Issani A. Diagnostic protocols and newer treatment modalities for cluster headache. Dis Mon 2022; 68:101316. [PMID: 35000758 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Cluster Headaches are one of the most arguably severe forms of primary headache syndrome that affects humans. Although it is relatively uncommon, it has a significant impact on the quality of life. It is a multifactorial disease that has risk factors ranging from seasonal changes, lifestyle habits to genetics. It occurs in 2 forms- Episodic and Chronic, each having its well-defined Diagnostic Criteria. Moreover, Cluster Headache has an exhaustive list of options for both Preventive and Abortive treatment. This article focuses on Cluster Headache, its pathophysiology, risk factors, differentials, and its diverse treatment modalities. In this study, an all-language literature search was conducted on Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar till October 2021. The following search strings and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used: "Cluster Headache," "Triptans," "Neuromodulation," and "Migraine." We explored the literature on Cluster Headache for its epidemiology, pathophysiology, the role of various genes and how they bring about the disease as well as its episodic and chronic variants, and treatment options. Although we have a wide variety of options for Preventive and Abortive therapy, newer more effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are being developed, and must be integrated into new treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakshi Prasad
- Faculty of Medicine, National Pirogov, Memorial Medical University, 21018, Vinnytsya, Ukraine.
| | | | - Nirja Kaka
- GMERS Medical College, Himmatnagar 383001, Gujarat, India.
| | - Sharan Jhaveri
- Smt. NHL Municipal Medical college, Ahmedabad 380006, India.
| | - Chaithanya Avanthika
- Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences,PB Road, Hubli 580022, Karnataka, India.
| | - Neil Patel
- GMERS Medical College, Himmatnagar 383001, Gujarat, India.
| | - Ivan Augustine
- Government Medical college Thrissur 680596, Kerala,India.
| | - Ali Issani
- Baqai Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Background Cluster headache is a highly disabling primary headache disorder which is widely described as the most painful condition a human can experience. Aim To provide an overview of the clinical characteristics, epidemiology, risk factors, differential diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment options of cluster headache, with a focus on recent developments in the field. Methods Structured review of the literature on cluster headache. Results Cluster headache affects approximately one in 1000 of the population. It is characterised by attacks of severe unilateral head pain associated with ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms, and the tendency for attacks to occur with circadian and circannual periodicity. The pathophysiology of cluster headache and other primary headache disorders has recently become better understood and is thought to involve the hypothalamus and trigeminovascular system. There is good quality evidence for acute treatment of attacks with parenteral triptans and high flow oxygen; preventive treatment with verapamil; and transitional treatment with oral corticosteroids or greater occipital nerve injection. New pharmacological and neuromodulation therapies have recently been developed. Conclusion Cluster headache causes distinctive symptoms, which once they are recognised can usually be managed with a variety of established treatments. Recent pathophysiological understanding has led to the development of newer pharmacological and neuromodulation therapies, which may soon become established in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Cheema
- Headache and Facial Pain Group, University College London (UCL) Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Manjit Matharu
- Headache and Facial Pain Group, University College London (UCL) Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Cluster headache (CH), paroxysmal hemicrania (PH), short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (including SUNCT and SUNA), and hemicrania continua (HC) compose the group of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs). Here, we review the recent advances in the field and summarize the current knowledge about the origin of these headaches. Similar to the other primary headaches, the pathogenesis is still much obscure. However, advances are being made in both animal models and humans studies. Three structures clearly appear to be crucial in the pathophysiology of TACs: the trigeminal nerve, the facial parasympathetic system, and the hypothalamus. The physiologic and pathologic functioning of each of these elements and their interactions is being progressively clarified, but critical questions are still open.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Giani
- Neuroalgology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Leone
- Neuroalgology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy.
- Neuroalgology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, MI, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cluster headache pathophysiology - insights from current and emerging treatments. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17:308-324. [PMID: 33782592 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00477-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Cluster headache is a debilitating primary headache disorder that affects approximately 0.1% of the population worldwide. Cluster headache attacks involve severe unilateral pain in the trigeminal distribution together with ipsilateral cranial autonomic features and a sense of agitation. Acute treatments are available and are effective in just over half of the patients. Until recently, preventive medications were borrowed from non-headache indications, so management of cluster headache is challenging. However, as our understanding of cluster headache pathophysiology has evolved on the basis of key bench and neuroimaging studies, crucial neuropeptides and brain structures have been identified as emerging treatment targets. In this Review, we provide an overview of what is known about the pathophysiology of cluster headache and discuss the existing treatment options and their mechanisms of action. Existing acute treatments include triptans and high-flow oxygen, interim treatment options include corticosteroids in oral form or for greater occipital nerve block, and preventive treatments include verapamil, lithium, melatonin and topiramate. We also consider emerging treatment options, including calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation, sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation and somatostatin receptor agonists, discuss how evidence from trials of these emerging treatments provides insights into the pathophysiology of cluster headache and highlight areas for future research.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ribeiro LNM, Rodrigues da Silva GH, Couto VM, Castro SR, Breitkreitz MC, Martinez CS, Igartúa DE, Prieto MJ, de Paula E. Functional Hybrid Nanoemulsions for Sumatriptan Intranasal Delivery. Front Chem 2020; 8:589503. [PMID: 33282832 PMCID: PMC7689160 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.589503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, advanced nanohybrid materials processed as pharmaceuticals have proved to be very advantageous. Triptans, such as the commercially available intranasal sumatriptan (SMT), are drugs employed in the treatment of painful migraine symptoms. However, SMT effectiveness by the intranasal route is limited by its high hydrophilicity and poor mucoadhesion. Therefore, we designed hybrid nanoemulsions (NE) composed of copaiba oil as the organic component plus biopolymers (xanthan, pectin, alginate) solubilized in the continuous aqueous phase, aiming at the intranasal release of SMT (2% w/v). Firstly, drug-biopolymer complexes were optimized in order to decrease the hydrophilicity of SMT. The resultant complexes were further encapsulated in copaiba oil-based nanoparticles, forming NE formulations. Characterization by FTIR-ATR, DSC, and TEM techniques exposed details of the molecular arrangement of the hybrid systems. Long-term stability of the hybrid NE at 25°C was confirmed over a year, regarding size (~ 120 nm), polydispersity (~ 0.2), zeta potential (~ −25 mV), and nanoparticle concentration (~ 2.1014 particles/mL). SMT encapsulation efficiency in the formulations ranged between 41–69%, extending the in vitro release time of SMT from 5 h (free drug) to more than 24 h. The alginate-based NE was selected as the most desirable system and its in vivo nanotoxicity was evaluated in a zebrafish model. Hybrid NE treatment did not affect spontaneous movement or induce morphological changes in zebrafish larvae, and there was no evidence of mortality or cardiotoxicity after 48 h of treatment. With these results, we propose alginate-based nanoemulsions as a potential treatment for migraine pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lígia N. M. Ribeiro
- Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Gustavo H. Rodrigues da Silva
- Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Verônica M. Couto
- Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Simone R. Castro
- Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Márcia C. Breitkreitz
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Carolina S. Martinez
- Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, Bernal, Argentina
| | - Daniela E. Igartúa
- Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, Bernal, Argentina
| | - Maria J. Prieto
- Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, Bernal, Argentina
| | - Eneida de Paula
- Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Eneida de Paula
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Giani L, Cecchini AP, Astengo A, Lauria G, Leone M. Cluster headache not responsive to sumatriptan: A retrospective study. Cephalalgia 2020; 41:117-121. [PMID: 32883087 DOI: 10.1177/0333102420956705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Subcutaneous sumatriptan, a 5HT1B/1D agonist, is the most effective drug in cluster headache acute treatment. About 25% of the patients do not respond to subcutaneous sumatriptan; the reasons for this are unknown. In this study, we compare clinical characteristics of cluster headache patients responding and non-responding to subcutaneous sumatriptan. METHODS We retrospectively investigated the clinical records of 277 cluster headache patients. Patients reporting repeated satisfactory response to subcutaneous sumatriptan within 15 minutes were considered responders. RESULTS Of 206 cluster headache patients who had used subcutaneous sumatriptan (mean age 45.6, 16% females, 48% chronic), 91% were responders, and 9% non-responders. Compared to responders, non-responders had longer and more frequent attacks: 60 (median; IQR 38-90) vs. 100 (60-120) minutes (p = 0.028), 4 (2.5-5) vs. 3 (2-4) attacks/day (p = 0.024). No other difference was found. CONCLUSIONS In cluster headache attacks with long duration and high frequency, pain mechanisms not involving 5HT1B/1D receptors may play a more relevant role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Giani
- Neuroalgology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Astengo
- Neuroalgology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lauria
- Neuroalgology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Leone
- Neuroalgology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clemow DB, Johnson KW, Hochstetler HM, Ossipov MH, Hake AM, Blumenfeld AM. Lasmiditan mechanism of action - review of a selective 5-HT 1F agonist. J Headache Pain 2020; 21:71. [PMID: 32522164 PMCID: PMC7288483 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01132-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, but it is still underdiagnosed and undertreated. Research on the pathophysiology of this neurological disease led to the discovery that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a key neuropeptide involved in pain signaling during a migraine attack. CGRP-mediated neuronal sensitization and glutamate-based second- and third-order neuronal signaling may be an important component involved in migraine pain. The activation of several serotonergic receptor subtypes can block the release of CGRP, other neuropeptides, and neurotransmitters, and can relieve the symptoms of migraine. Triptans were the first therapeutics developed for the treatment of migraine, working through serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptors. The discovery that the serotonin 1F (5-HT1F) receptor was expressed in the human trigeminal ganglion suggested that this receptor subtype may have a role in the treatment of migraine. The 5-HT1F receptor is found on terminals and cell bodies of trigeminal ganglion neurons and can modulate the release of CGRP from these nerves. Unlike 5-HT1B receptors, the activation of 5-HT1F receptors does not cause vasoconstriction.The potency of different serotonergic agonists towards 5-HT1F was correlated in an animal model of migraine (dural plasma protein extravasation model) leading to the development of lasmiditan. Lasmiditan is a newly approved acute treatment for migraine in the United States and is a lipophilic, highly selective 5-HT1F agonist that can cross the blood-brain barrier and act at peripheral nervous system (PNS) and central nervous system (CNS) sites.Lasmiditan activation of CNS-located 5-HT1F receptors (e.g., in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis) could potentially block the release of CGRP and the neurotransmitter glutamate, thus preventing and possibly reversing the development of central sensitization. Activation of 5-HT1F receptors in the thalamus can block secondary central sensitization of this region, which is associated with progression of migraine and extracephalic cutaneous allodynia. The 5-HT1F receptors are also elements of descending pain modulation, presenting another site where lasmiditan may alleviate migraine. There is emerging evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction might be implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine, and that 5-HT1F receptors can promote mitochondrial biogenesis. While the exact mechanism is unknown, evidence suggests that lasmiditan can alleviate migraine through 5-HT1F agonist activity that leads to inhibition of neuropeptide and neurotransmitter release and inhibition of PNS trigeminovascular and CNS pain signaling pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ann M Hake
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Holland PR, Sureda-Gibert P, Vila-Pueyo M. Rapid uptake of sumatriptan into the brain: An ongoing question of blood-brain barrier permeability. Cephalalgia 2020; 40:327-329. [PMID: 32000507 PMCID: PMC7605048 DOI: 10.1177/0333102420905131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Philip R Holland
- Headache Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paula Sureda-Gibert
- Headache Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marta Vila-Pueyo
- Headache Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|