1
|
Goadsby PJ, Friedman DI, Holle-Lee D, Demarquay G, Ashina S, Sakai F, Neel B, Gandhi P, Dabruzzo B, Smith JH, Liu Y, Trugman JM. Efficacy of Atogepant in Chronic Migraine With and Without Acute Medication Overuse in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 PROGRESS Trial. Neurology 2024; 103:e209584. [PMID: 38924724 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Atogepant is an oral, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. We evaluated the efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM) in participants with and without acute medication overuse. METHODS This subgroup analysis of the phase 3, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROGRESS trial evaluated adults with a ≥1-year history of CM, ≥15 monthly headache days (MHDs), and ≥8 monthly migraine days (MMDs) during the 4-week baseline period. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, atogepant 30 mg twice daily (BID), or atogepant 60 mg once daily (QD) for 12 weeks and were analyzed by acute medication overuse status (triptans/ergots for ≥10 days per month, simple analgesics for ≥15 days per month, or combinations of triptans/ergots/simple analgesics for ≥10 days per month). Outcomes included change from baseline in mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days; ≥50% reduction in mean MMDs across 12 weeks; and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. RESULTS Of 755 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, 500 (66.2%) met baseline acute medication overuse criteria (placebo, n = 169 [68.7%]; atogepant 30 mg BID, n = 161 [63.6%]; atogepant 60 mg QD, n = 170 [66.4%]). The least squares mean difference (LSMD) (95% CI) from placebo in MMDs was -2.7 (-4.0 to -1.4) with atogepant 30 mg BID and -1.9 (-3.2 to -0.6) with atogepant 60 mg QD. Mean MHDs (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.0 to -1.5] and -2.1 [-3.3 to -0.8]) and mean acute medication use days (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.1 to -1.6] and -2.6 [-3.9 to -1.3]) were reduced and a higher proportion of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in MMDs (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.5 [1.5-4.0] and 2.3 [1.4-3.7]) with atogepant 30 mg BID and atogepant 60 mg QD. There was a 52.1%-61.9% reduction in the proportion of atogepant-treated participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria over 12 weeks. Atogepant improved PRO measures. Similar results were observed in the subgroup without acute medication overuse. DISCUSSION Atogepant was effective in participants with CM, with and without acute medication overuse, as evidenced by reductions in mean MMDs, MHDs, and acute medication use days; reductions in the proportion of participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria; and improvements in PROs. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03855137. Submitted: February 25, 2019; first patient enrolled: March 11, 2019. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03855137. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that atogepant reduces mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days in adult patients with or without medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Goadsby
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Deborah I Friedman
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Dagny Holle-Lee
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Genevieve Demarquay
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Sait Ashina
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Fumihiko Sakai
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Brian Neel
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Pranav Gandhi
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Brett Dabruzzo
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Jonathan H Smith
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Yingyi Liu
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Joel M Trugman
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosignoli C, Caponnetto V, Onofri A, Trozzi V, Tartaglione L, Silvestro M, Russo A, Sacco S, Ornello R. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway improve the effectiveness of acute medication-a real-world study. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:3305-3312. [PMID: 38340218 PMCID: PMC11176241 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07380-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the aims of migraine prevention is to improve response to acute migraine treatments. The aim of the present study was to assess whether monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP-mAbs) can improve the perceived efficacy of acute treatments. METHODS We included and followed up patients with chronic or episodic migraine from the Headache Centers of Avezzano-L'Aquila and Naples treated with CGRP-mAbs from March 2021 to December 2022. All patients filled out the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (MTOQ), the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and the Migraine Impact and Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) at baseline and 3-6 months after the start of treatment with CGRP-mAbs. RESULTS Sixty-five patients (81.3%) completed the 6-month follow-up. Most patients were female (55, 84.6%), with a median age of 46 years (IQR 39-56). Median MTOQ score increased from 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-13) at baseline to 15 (IQR 11-17) at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 16 (IQR 13-17) at the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Median migraine days over 90-day periods decreased from 40 (IQR 24-60) to 24 (IQR 15-30) at 3 months (p < 0.001) and to 20 (IQR 12-24) at 6 months (p < 0.001). Median monthly intake of acute medication decreased from 55 doses (IQR 29-80.5) to 24 doses (IQR 15-40) at 3 months and 18 doses (IQR 11-30) at 6 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We showed that 6 months of preventive treatment with CGRP-mAbs led to a significantly better effectiveness of acute treatments, paralleled by decreased monthly migraine days and acute treatment intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Rosignoli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Agnese Onofri
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Vittorio Trozzi
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tartaglione
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang YF, Yang FC, Chen LA, Chang TY, Su HC, Yang CP, Tu YH, Tzeng YS, Chen SP, Fuh JL, Lai KL, Ling YH, Chen WT, Wang SJ. Comparative effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: A multicenter, real-world study in Taiwan. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16372. [PMID: 38837528 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine (CM) patients. METHODS This multicenter study involved retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA, including difficult-to-treat (DTT) patients (i.e., ≥3 preventive failures). Treatment outcomes were determined at 6 months based on prospective headache diaries and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). RESULTS The study included 316 (55 M/261F, mean age 44.4 ± 13.5 years) and 333 (61 M/272F, mean age 47.9 ± 13.4 years) CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinbumtoxinA, respectively. At 6 months, CGRP mAb treatment was associated with a greater decrease in monthly migraine days (MMDs) (-13.0 vs. -8.7 days/month, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% responder rate (RR) (74.7% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The findings were consistent in DTT patients (-13.0 vs. -9.1 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 73.9% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001) or those with medication-overuse headache (MOH) (-13.3 vs. -9.0 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 79.0% vs. 51.6%, p < 0.001). Besides, patients receiving CGRP mAbs had greater improvement (-42.2 vs. -11.8, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% RR (62.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.001) in MIDAS scores and a lower rate of adverse events (AEs) (6.0% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). However, none of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter, real-world study, CGRP mAbs were more effective than onabotulinumtoxinA in CM patients, even in DTT or MOH patients. All of these injectables were well tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to verify these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Feng Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Chi Yang
- Department of Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Lu-An Chen
- Department of Neurology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Yu Chang
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Chen Su
- Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Pai Yang
- Department of Neurology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsien Tu
- Department of Neurology, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Shiang Tzeng
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Pin Chen
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Translational Research, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jong-Ling Fuh
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Lin Lai
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsiang Ling
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ta Chen
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, Keelung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gosalia H, Moreno-Ajona D, Goadsby PJ. Medication-overuse headache: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:89. [PMID: 38816828 PMCID: PMC11140994 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01755-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Medication-overuse headache (MOH), which potentially involves 1-2% of the population, is defined as a headache, on ≥ 15 days a month affected, along with overuse of one or other acute attack medications. MOH presents with significant challenges in the headache community, particularly in clinical settings raising various questions about its pathophysiology. Through a review of the current literature and our clinical experience, we have explored the mechanisms through which MOH may occur, provide an understanding of the current state of treatment and detail some possible views on the understanding and treatment of this condition. We evaluate the variations in treatment methods offered globally and understanding of the disorder. Above all interventions, patient education is crucial, which is underscored by an analysis of the academic publications. Given the condition is preventable, early intervention is imperative and patient awareness is highlighted as key. Globally, there is no uniform treatment methodology, which may be advantageous as approaches need to take local circumstances into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helin Gosalia
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Moreno-Ajona
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London, UK
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sirilertmekasakul C, Panto A, Lekhalawan P, Panyarachun P, Jindasakchai P, Rattanawong W. The transition of medication overuse status by acute medication categories in episodic or chronic migraine patients to non-overuse status after receiving anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized control trial. Neurol Sci 2024:10.1007/s10072-024-07496-7. [PMID: 38564060 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07496-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether patients with episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), who were treated with anti-CGRP antibodies, showed a reversal from medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) status at their baseline to non-overuse status. Furthermore, this study aimed to establish which acute headache medication (AHM) categories responded more effectively to anti-CGRP antibodies. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database for relevant studies from January 2013 to September 2023. We included phase three randomized controlled trials to examine the role of anti-CGRP antibodies in patients with EM or CM and their MO status. A meta-analysis was conducted to find the association between anti-CGRP antibodies and the number of EM and CM patients with MO or MOH at baseline that reverted to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold. RESULTS The initial search yielded a total of 345 studies. After removing duplicates and screening with inclusion criteria, 5 studies fulfilled our conditions. Each study reviewed the response to changes in the MO status of patients after receiving anti-CGRP antibodies, including eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and erenumab, compared to placebo. Our study analyzed three AHM categories: triptans, simple analgesics, and multiple drugs. The overall relative risk (RR) was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.31 to 1.59; p < 0.001). The RRs for triptans, simple analgesics, and multi-drug groups were 1.71 (95% CI, 1.53 to 1.91; p < 0.001), 1.10 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.47; p = 0.5), and 1.29 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.46; p < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION The meta-analysis has shown that anti-CGRP antibodies were statistically significant in transitioning from MO or MOH status to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold (RR = 1.44) for all included studies and all AHM categories except for simple analgesics. Patients from the triptan group had the highest RR of 1.71 with a p-value < 0.001, while the simple analgesics group had an RR of 1.10, however, with a p-value > 0.05. Interestingly, this analysis can be interpreted as that anti-CGRP antibodies might not be effective in reducing simple analgesics use in EM or CM patients. Further studies are needed to investigate these matters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akkanat Panto
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Pattanan Lekhalawan
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Pariyada Panyarachun
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Porpim Jindasakchai
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Wanakorn Rattanawong
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnston K, Powell LC, Popoff E, L'Italien GJ, Pawinski R, Ahern A, Large S, Tran T, Jenkins A. Cost-effectiveness of rimegepant oral lyophilisate compared to best supportive care for the acute treatment of migraine in the UK. J Med Econ 2024; 27:627-643. [PMID: 38590236 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2340932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Migraine is the most common disabling headache disorder and is characterized by recurrent throbbing head pain and symptoms of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting. Rimegepant 75 mg, an oral lyophilisate calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist, is the first treatment approved for both the acute and preventative treatment of migraine, and the first acute therapy approved in over 20-years. The objective was to assess the cost-utility of rimegepant compared with best supportive care (BSC) in the UK, for the acute treatment of migraine in the adults with inadequate symptom relief after taking at least 2 triptans, or for whom triptans are contraindicated or not tolerated. MATERIALS AND METHODS A de novo model was developed to estimate incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), structured as a decision tree followed by Markov model. Patients received rimegepant or BSC for a migraine attack and were assessed for response (pain relief at 2-h). Responders and non-responders followed different pain trajectories over 48-h cycles. Non-responders discontinued treatment while responders continued treatment for subsequent attacks, with a proportion discontinuing over time. Data sources included a post-hoc pooled analysis of the phase 3 acute rimegepant trials (NCT03235479, NCT03237845, NCT03461757), and a long-term safety study (NCT03266588). The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services over a 20-year time horizon. RESULTS Rimegepant resulted in an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of £10,309 per QALY gained vs BSC, which is cost-effectiveness at a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000/QALY. Rimegepant generated +0.44 incremental QALYs and higher incremental lifetime costs (£4,492). Improved QALYs for rimegepant were a result of less time spent with severe and moderate headache pain. CONCLUSION This study highlights the economic value of rimegepant which was found to be cost-effective for the acute treatment of migraine in adults unsuitable for triptans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karissa Johnston
- Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lauren C Powell
- Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Evan Popoff
- Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alsaadi T, Kayed DM, Al-Madani A, Hassan AM, Terruzzi A, Krieger D, Riachi N, Sarathchandran P, Al-Rukn S. Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Use of CGRP-Based Therapies for Migraine Prevention in the UAE. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1845-1865. [PMID: 37792218 PMCID: PMC10630270 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00550-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a common debilitating neurological disorder affecting a large proportion of the general population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37-amino acid neuropeptide, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and the development of therapies targeting the anti-CGRP pathway has revolutionized the field of migraine treatment. METHODS An expert task force of neurologists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) developed and critically assessed recommendations on the use of CGRP-based therapies in migraine treatment and management in the UAE, based on available published literature. A consensus was reached for each statement by means of an open-voting process, based on a predefined agreement level of at least 60%. RESULTS The consensus recommendations advocate the need for guidelines for the appropriate use of CGRP-based therapies by defining patient cohorts and appropriate monitoring of therapeutic response as well as standardizing the initiation, assessment, and cessation of treatment. The consensus recommendations were primarily formulated on the basis of international studies, because of the limited availability of regional and local data. As such, they may also act as guidelines for global healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS These are the first consensus recommendations for the UAE that address the use of CGRP-based therapies in the treatment and management of migraine, integrating both clinical evidence and medical expertise to enhance clinical judgment and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taoufik Alsaadi
- Department of Neurology, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
| | - Deeb M Kayed
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | | | | | | | - Derk Krieger
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic Parkview Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Naji Riachi
- Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Khalifa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kowacs PA, Sampaio Rocha-Filho PA, Peres MFP, Edvinsson L. The history and rationale of the development of new drugs for migraine treatment. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2023; 81:1084-1097. [PMID: 38157876 PMCID: PMC10756794 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most prevalent and disabling diseases in the world. Migraine attack treatments and prophylactic treatments of this disease are essential to lessen its individual, social, and economic impact. This is a narrative review of the main drugs used for treating migraine, as well as the experimental models and the theoretical frameworks that led to their development. Ergot derivatives, triptans, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, beta-blockers,: flunarizine,: valproic acid,: topiramate, onabotulinumtoxin A, ditans, monoclonal antibodies against CGRP and its receptor, and gepants are discussed. Possible therapeutic targets for the development of new drugs that are under development are also addressed. Many of the drugs currently in use for treating migraine were developed for the treatment of other diseases, but have proven effective for the treatment of migraine, expanding knowledge about the disease. With a better understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine, new drugs have been and continue to be developed specifically for the treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro André Kowacs
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Serviço de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Unidade do Sistema Nervoso, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
| | - Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Médicas, Divisão de Neuropsiquiatria, Recife PE, Brazil.
- Universidade de Pernambuco, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Clínica de Cefaleia, Recife PE, Brazil.
| | | | - Lars Edvinsson
- Lund University, Institute of Clinical Sciences, 22185 Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ito Y, Mitsufuji T, Okada M, Fujita S, Yokoyama R, Kawasaki H, Yamamoto T. Early Effect of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine with Medication Overuse: A Single-center Retrospective Study. Intern Med 2023; 62:3455-3460. [PMID: 37062749 PMCID: PMC10749820 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1471-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-(receptor) monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been reported to reduce the frequency of medication overuse in patients with migraine. The present study investigated whether or not CGRP-mAb treatment shows early effectiveness for medication overuse headache (MOH) in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients with MOH who received preventive treatment with CGRP-mAb from June 2021 to October 2022. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition was used to diagnose MOH. This study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University. Patients were recruited from this specialized headache outpatient center. Results In total, 69 patients with migraine had newly introduced CGRP-mAb, and 34 patients had MOH (49.3%). The mean±standard deviation patient age was 44±15.5 years old. The study population included 24 women (70.6%). The types of CGRP-mAb used were galcanezumab in 16 patients (47.0%), fremanezumab in 10 (29.4%), and erenumab in 8 (23.5%). The mean disease duration was 19.6±13.1 years. The types of migraine diagnosis were chronic migraine in 28 patients (82.4%) and migraine with aura in 11 patients (32.4%). The mean number of headache days in the month before administration of CGRP-mAb was 22±7.7 days; 1 month after administration, the MHD was 16.9±9.1 days. The change in MHD was -5.7 days (22.7%), indicating significant improvement (p<0.05). Conclusion CGRP-mAb has been suggested as a preventive treatment for patients with MOH. Further investigation of the long-term efficacy of CGRP-mAb for MOH is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Ito
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | | | - Mariko Okada
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | - Shugo Fujita
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | - Ryu Yokoyama
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Imai N, Isogai Y, Shibasaki Y, Nakai M, Ishida M, Ning X, Koga N. Effects of Fremanezumab on Medication Overuse in Japanese Chronic Migraine Patients: Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1981-1991. [PMID: 37695442 PMCID: PMC10630291 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00531-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic migraine (CM) patients commonly take acute headache medications, often resulting in medication overuse (MO). This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of fremanezumab in CM patients from Japan with and without MO, which is not yet established. METHODS A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2b/3 trial randomized patients (1:1:1) to monthly fremanezumab via subcutaneous injection (initial dose: 675 mg, second/third doses: 225 mg), quarterly fremanezumab (initial dose: 675 mg, second/third doses: placebo), or placebo for 3 months. This post hoc analysis analyzed data from Japanese patients with and without MO (monthly use of acute headache medication ≥ 15 days, migraine-specific acute medication ≥ 10 days, or combination medication ≥ 10 days). Outcomes included the original primary endpoint of average headache days of moderate or greater severity per month (HDs), the proportion of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in HDs and the proportion of patients changing status from with to without MO. RESULTS Of 479 patients enrolled, 320 (66.8%) had baseline MO. Monthly average HDs were significantly reduced versus placebo with fremanezumab in both patients with MO (mean [standard error] difference vs. placebo: monthly - 2.0 [0.6], p = 0.0012; quarterly - 1.8 [0.6], p = 0.0042) and without MO (- 1.6 [0.8], p = 0.0437; - 1.5 [0.8], p = 0.0441). Significantly more fremanezumab-treated patients with MO (monthly 28/108 [25.9%], p = 0.0040 quarterly 25/99 [25.3%], p = 0.0070) or without MO (18/50 [36.0%], p = 0.0132; and 21/60 [35.0%], p = 0.0126) had ≥ 50% reduction in HDs versus placebo (12/111 [10.8%] and 7/49 [14.3%], respectively). A significantly greater proportion of fremanezumab-treated patients reverted to no MO (monthly 50/108 [46.3%], p = 0.0115; quarterly 44/99 [44.4%], p = 0.0272) vs. placebo (33/111 [29.7%]). CONCLUSION Fremanezumab appears effective as preventive migraine treatment in Japanese CM patients with or without MO while also being beneficial in reducing MO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noboru Imai
- Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yuki Isogai
- Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 16-4 Kounan 2-Chome, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-8242, Japan.
| | - Yoshiyuki Shibasaki
- Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 16-4 Kounan 2-Chome, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-8242, Japan
| | | | - Miki Ishida
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan
| | - Xiaoping Ning
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, West Chester, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yalinay Dikmen P, Baykan B, Uludüz D, Özge A, Ilgaz Aydınlar E, Polat B, Karlı N, Tepe N, Çelebisoy N, Ergin Toktaş H, Niflioğlu B, Karacı R, Mayda Domaç F, Uludüz E, Erdogan Soyukibar T, Öksüz N, Ertaş M. Real-life experiences with galcanezumab and predictors for treatment response in Turkey. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:418. [PMID: 37996793 PMCID: PMC10666377 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03467-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of clinical practice extends far beyond the controlled settings of trials, and there is a need for real-world studies aimed at identifying which patients will respond to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in different countries. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in treating migraine in a real-life setting in Turkey, as well as identify predictors of treatment response. METHODS A total of 476 patients who diagnosed with migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria and treated with galcanezumab by headache specialists were voluntarily participated in this cross-sectional study. Galcanezumab is indicated for the prevention of migraine in adults who have at least 4 monthly migraine days in Turkey. All patients filled out a survey on Google Form that comprised 54 questions, addressing various aspects such as demographics, migraine characteristics, previous use of acute symptomatic medication, failures with preventive drug classes, comorbidities, most bothersome symptoms, as well as the interictal burden of migraine. RESULTS Among the participants, 89.3% reported that galcanezumab treatment was beneficial for them. A decrease in the frequency (80.0%), severity (85.7%), and acute medication usage for migraine attacks (71.4%) was reported with galcanezumab treatment. An adverse effect related to galcanezumab was reported in 16.3% of cases, but no serious adverse reactions were observed. Remarkably, 14.3% of participants reported no longer experiencing any headaches, and 18.9% did not require any acute treatment while receiving galcanezumab treatment. A logistic regression model showed that male gender, lack of ictal nausea, and previous failure of more than 2 prophylactic agents may predict the non-responders. CONCLUSIONS The first large series from Turkey showed that galcanezumab treatment is safe and effective in most of the patients diagnosed with migraine by headache experts in the real-life setting. Patients reported a significant decrease in both ictal and interictal burden of migraine and expressed satisfaction with this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pınar Yalinay Dikmen
- School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Acibadem University, Büyükdere Caddesi. No: 40, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey.
| | | | - Derya Uludüz
- Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aynur Özge
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Elif Ilgaz Aydınlar
- School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Acibadem University, Büyükdere Caddesi. No: 40, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey
| | - Burcu Polat
- School of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Necdet Karlı
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Nermin Tepe
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Balikesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey
| | - Neşe Çelebisoy
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | - Rahşan Karacı
- Neurology Department, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Füsun Mayda Domaç
- Neurology Department, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ezgi Uludüz
- Koc University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuba Erdogan Soyukibar
- School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Acibadem University, Büyükdere Caddesi. No: 40, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey
| | - Nevra Öksüz
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Ertaş
- Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hyeraci G, Paoletti O, Iannone LF, Gini R, De Cesaris F, Geppetti P, Roberto G. Patterns of anti-CGRP mAbs use and variation of triptan consumption following treatment initiation: A descriptive drug utilization study in the Tuscany region, Italy. Headache 2023; 63:1391-1402. [PMID: 37830925 DOI: 10.1111/head.14639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the pattern of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) utilization in the Tuscany region, Italy, and the variation of triptan consumption after treatment initiation. BACKGROUND Given the recent commercialization of anti-CGRP mAbs as migraine preventive medications, real-world evidence on their patterns of utilization and their impact on migraine abortive medication use is still limited. METHODS A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study on the real-world utilization of anti-CGRP mAbs was performed using the population-based regional administrative database of Tuscany. Patients with ≥1 anti-CGRP mAb dispensing (namely erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab) between April 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021, were identified. The first dispensing was the cohort entry (CE). New users (NUs) were patients with no anti-CGRP mAb dispensing before CE. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were plotted to describe the cumulative probability of remaining with the initial anti-CGRP mAb during a 15-month follow-up period as a measure of treatment persistence. Among NUs with ≥2 triptan dispensings during the 6 months before CE (i.e., baseline), the mean monthly number of triptan dosage units dispensed was measured in five consecutive follow-up time windows (months 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12, 13-15) and the difference from the baseline was calculated. RESULTS A total of 624 NUs (erenumab = 295, galcanezumab = 223, fremanezumab = 106) were identified, of whom 188 (78%) were women. Mean age was 49.2 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12.6). The survival to discontinuation at 6, 12, and 15 months was about 69%, 48%, and 6%, respectively. The survival to switch was about 6% at 15 months. The observed variation of triptan consumption at 3/6/9/12/15 months and the corresponding SD was -4.4 [8.2]/-5.2 [9.0]/-5.5 [9.2]/-5.4 [9.2]/-4.5 [10.0], respectively. CONCLUSION Patient demographics reflect the place of these medications in therapy. Overall, findings seem to indicate a favorable tolerability and effectiveness profile. Further studies are warranted to better establish the long-term comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs compared to other preventive medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Hyeraci
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| | - Olga Paoletti
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rosa Gini
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cesaris
- Headache Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Roberto
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Juhasz G, Gecse K, Baksa D. Towards precision medicine in migraine: Recent therapeutic advances and potential biomarkers to understand heterogeneity and treatment response. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 250:108523. [PMID: 37657674 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
After 35 years since the introduction of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD), we are living in the era of the second great revolution in migraine therapies. First, discoveries of triptans provided a breakthrough in acute migraine treatment utilizing bench-to-bedside research results on the role of serotonin in migraine. Next, the discovery of the role of neuropeptides, more specifically calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine attack led to the development of anti-CGRP therapies that are effective both in acute and preventive treatment, and are also able to reduce migraine-related burden. Here, we reviewed the most recent clinical studies and real-world data on available migraine-specific medications, including triptans, ditants, gepants and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Novel drug targets, such as PACAP and amylins were also discussed. To address the main challenges of migraine therapy, the high heterogeneity of people with migraine, the prevalent presence of various comorbid disorders, and the insufficient medical care of migraine patients were covered. Promising novel approaches from the fields of omics, blood and saliva biomarker, imaging and provocation studies might bring solutions for these challenges with the potential to identify further drug targets, distinguish more homogeneous patient subgroups, contribute to more optimal drug selection strategies, and detect biomarkers in association with headache features or predicting treatment efficacy. In the future, the combined analysis of data of different biomarker modalities with machine learning algorithms may serve precision medicine in migraine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Juhasz
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Kinga Gecse
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Daniel Baksa
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Personality and Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krymchantowski A, Jevoux C, Krymchantowski AG, Silva-Néto RP. Medication Overuse Headache, Chronic Migraine and Monoclonal Antibodies Anti-CGRP: A Real-World Study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2023; 46:181-185. [PMID: 37748000 DOI: 10.1097/wnf.0000000000000559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medication overuse headache (MOH) in chronic migraineurs may be a cause or consequence of the overuse of symptomatic medications for headache attacks. It is highly prevalent in tertiary centers. We compared the efficacy of 3 anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies with traditional pharmacological agents in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and MOH. METHODS A randomized, cross-sectional, prospective, and open trial with real-world comparison groups was carried out. The sample consisted of 100 consecutive patients having CM and MOH. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (65 women and 23 men) were included in the study and divided into 4 groups: those having used erenumab (19.3%), galcanezumab (29.6%), fremanezumab (25%) and conventional medications, and the control group (26.1%). Ages ranged from 18 to 78 years (mean, 44.1 ± 13.6 years). In the 6 months of follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the number of headache days in the 3 groups when compared with the control ( P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The small number of patients included in each group and the open design do not allow definitive conclusions, but the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with CM and MOH may result in lessening the number of headache days when compared with conventional treatment with drugs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hird MA, Sandoe CH. Medication Overuse Headache: an Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations on Management. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2023; 23:389-398. [PMID: 37271793 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01278-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OVERVIEW Medication overuse headache (MOH) is highly prevalent among individuals with primary headache disorders. PURPOSE OF REVIEW (1) Provide an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment strategies of MOH and (2) provide recommendations on the management of MOH. RECENT FINDINGS The prevalence of MOH ranges from 0.5 to 7.2%. Risk factors for MOH include female sex, lower socioeconomic status, some psychiatric conditions, and substance use disorders, among others. Recent large clinical trials support preventative therapy as an integral component of MOH management. Emerging clinical trial evidence supports anti-CGRP mAbs as effective preventative treatments among individuals with migraine and MOH. Among the large clinical trials, candesartan, topiramate, amitriptyline, and onabotulinumtoxinA were the most used preventative therapies, providing further support for these agents. MOH management requires a multifaceted and patient-centered approach that involves patient education, behavioral interventions, withdrawal of the overused medication, and initiation of preventative medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Hird
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Claire H Sandoe
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Centre for Headache, Women's College Hospital, 3rd Floor, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rhyne C, Cohen JM, Seminerio MJ, Carr K, Krasenbaum LJ. Burden of migraine with acute medication overuse or psychiatric comorbidities and treatment with CGRP pathway-targeted monoclonal antibodies: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e33874. [PMID: 37335663 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000033874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a complex and often debilitating neurological disease that affects more than 1 billion people worldwide. It is characterized by moderate-to-intense, throbbing headache attacks that are worsened by activity and is associated with nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light and sound. Migraine, ranked the second leading cause of years lived with disability by the World Health Organization, can diminish patients' quality of life and bring significant personal and economic burden. Furthermore, migraine patients with a history of acute medication overuse (AMO) or psychiatric comorbidities, such as depression or anxiety, may experience even greater impairment and burden, and their migraine may be more difficult-to-treat. Appropriate treatment of migraine is essential to reduce this burden and improve patient outcomes, especially for those with AMO or psychiatric comorbidities. There are several available preventive treatment options for migraine, though many of these are not migraine-specific and may have limited efficacy and/or poor tolerability. The calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and monoclonal antibodies that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway have been developed as specific preventive treatments for migraine. Four of these monoclonal antibodies have been approved for the preventive treatment of migraine after demonstrating favorable safety and efficacy profiles. These treatments offer substantial benefits for migraine patients, including those with AMO or common psychiatric comorbidities, by reducing monthly headache days and migraine days, days of acute medication use, and disability measures, as well as improving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua M Cohen
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, PA
| | | | - Karen Carr
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tepper SJ, Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Kudrow D, Ashina M, Reuter U, Dodick DW, Wang A, Cheng S, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine and acute medication overuse: A subgroup analysis. Headache 2023; 63:730-742. [PMID: 37313616 DOI: 10.1111/head.14536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess the long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine with acute medication overuse. BACKGROUND Overuse of acute medication in patients with chronic migraine has been linked to greater pain intensity and disability and may diminish the effectiveness of preventive therapies. METHODS This 52-week open-label extension study followed a 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled study in which patients with chronic migraine were randomized 3:2:2 to placebo or once-monthly erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg. Patients were stratified by region and medication overuse status. Patients received erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg throughout or switched from erenumab 70 to 140 mg (based on protocol amendment to augment safety data at higher dose). Efficacy was assessed in patients with and without medication overuse at parent study baseline. RESULTS Of 609 patients enrolled in the extension study, 252/609 (41.4%) met the criteria for medication overuse at parent study baseline. At Week 52, the mean change in monthly migraine days from parent study baseline was -9.3 (95% confidence interval: -10.4, -8.1 days) in the medication overuse subgroup versus -9.3 (-10.1, -8.5 days) in the non-medication overuse subgroup (combined erenumab doses); proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days at Week 52 was 55.9% (90/161; 48.2%, 63.3%) versus 61.3% (136/222; 54.7%, 67.4%), respectively. Among baseline users of acute migraine-specific medication, the mean change in monthly migraine-specific medication days at Week 52 was -7.4 (-8.3, -6.4 days) in the medication overuse subgroup versus -5.4 (-6.1, -4.7 days) in the non-medication overuse subgroup. Most patients (197/298; 66.1%) in the medication overuse subgroup transitioned to non-overuse status by Week 52. Erenumab 140 mg was associated with numerically greater efficacy than erenumab 70 mg across all endpoints. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Long-term erenumab treatment demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety in patients with chronic migraine with and without acute medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart J Tepper
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Kudrow
- California Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | | | | | - Jan Klatt
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guerzoni S, Baraldi C, Castro FL, Cainazzo MM, Pani L. Galcanezumab for the treatment of chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: Real-world clinical evidence in a severely impaired patient population. Brain Behav 2023; 13:e2799. [PMID: 37208838 PMCID: PMC10275517 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody acting against the calcitonin gene-related peptide approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. The aim of this article is to explore its effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab in chronic migraine (CM) with medication overuse-headache (MOH). METHODS Seventy-eight patients were consecutively enrolled at the Modena headache center and followed up for 15 months. Visits were scheduled every 3 months, and the following variables were collected: the number of migraine days per month (MDM); the painkillers taken per month (PM); the number of days per month in which the patient took, at least, one painkiller; the six-item headache impact test; and the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) score. Demographic features of the analyzed sample were collected at the baseline and adverse events (AEs) were collected at every visit. RESULTS After 12 months, galcanezumab significantly reduced the MDM, the PM, the number of days on medication, the HIT-6 as well as the MIDAS scores (all p < .0001). The greatest amelioration was obtained in the first trimester of treatment. A higher MDM, a higher NRS score at the baseline, and a higher number of failed preventive treatments negatively predict the CM relief at the year of treatment. No serious AEs were registered and only one drop-out was due to AE. CONCLUSIONS Galcanezumab is effective and safe for the treatment of patients affected by CM and MOH. Patients with a higher impairment at the baseline may found less benefits with galcanezumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology‐Headache Center and Drug Abuse‐Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist MedicinesAOU Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- PhD School in Neurosciences, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Flavia Lo Castro
- Post‐Gradute School in Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Maria Michela Cainazzo
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology‐Headache Center and Drug Abuse‐Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist MedicinesAOU Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Luca Pani
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology‐Headache Center and Drug Abuse‐Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist MedicinesAOU Policlinico di ModenaModenaItaly
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of MiamiMiamiFloridaUSA
- VeraSciDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Giri S, Tronvik E, Linde M, Pedersen SA, Hagen K. Randomized controlled studies evaluating Topiramate, Botulinum toxin type A, and mABs targeting CGRP in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231156922. [PMID: 36856015 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231156922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review focuses on chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache using, respectively, topiramate, botulinum toxin type A, and human monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science until May 2022. We included randomized controlled trials reporting the outcomes of change in monthly headache/migraine days, ≥50% response rates and change in medication overuse status. Studies were excluded if response rates were not reported. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. The quality of evidence for outcomes across included studies was evaluated according to the five factors outlined in Cochrane GRADE approach. FINDINGS The initial search resulted in 1599 records. Following screening, 10 studies met our inclusion criteria, while seven studies with sufficient data were included in the meta-analysis. Studies assessing Botulinum toxin type A included 1139 patients and showed a mean reduction in headache frequency by 1.92 days per month compared to placebo (-1.92; 95% CI -2.68 to -1.16). Studies assessing human monoclonal antibodies included 1982 patients, and showed significant positive effect compared to placebo for all measured outcomes. The overall odds ratio for the ≥50% response rate was 2.90 (95% CI, 2.23 to 3.78). No significant difference was observed in the frequency of adverse effect for both Botulinum toxin type A and low dose of human monoclonal antibodies compared to placebo. There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the impact of topiramate in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache. INTERPRETATION Botulinum toxin type A and human monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor were beneficial in reducing monthly migraine days and ≥50% response rate, but uncertainties remained for Botulinum toxin type A regarding response rate. The effect size for human monoclonal antibodies was greater with relatively lower drop-out rate. High-quality randomized trials are required to evaluate the effect of topiramate in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samita Giri
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erling Tronvik
- NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway.,Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mattias Linde
- NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway.,Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sindre Andre Pedersen
- The Medicine and Health Library, Library Section for Research Support, Data and Analysis, NTNU University Library, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Knut Hagen
- NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinical Research Unit Central Norway, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Terwindt GM. Preventive CGRP-targeted therapies for chronic migraine with and without medication-overuse headache. Cephalalgia 2023. [DOI: 10.1177/03331024221150235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Background: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) targeted therapies are an important breakthrough in migraine prevention. Randomized clinical trials, post-hoc analyses, and phase IV studies have demonstrated their efficacy and safety in chronic migraine patients, including those with concomitant medication-overuse and medication-overuse headache. Real world evidence studies support these findings and provide realistic endpoints for estimation of effect. Methods and results We have performed a narrative review including results from double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence studies regarding efficacy of the CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies and CGRP-receptor antagonists (gepants) in patients with chronic migraine with concomitant medication overuse (headache). We have included patient profiles and main efficacy endpoints (monthly migraine days, monthly headache days, monthly acute medication days and percentage responder rates). Conclusion The results of this review show that CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective in chronic migraine patients, also in those with medication overuse (headache). At the time of this review, atogepant clinical trials in chronic migraine have not been communicated. Direct comparative studies are needed for comparison with other treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gisela M. Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden Headache Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee HC, Cho S, Kim BK. Predictors of response to galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine: a real-world prospective observational study. Neurol Sci 2023:10.1007/s10072-023-06683-2. [PMID: 36826456 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06683-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high efficacy and tolerability, not all patients with chronic migraine benefit from anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to identify the clinical predictors of the response to galcanezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine from real-world data. METHODS We prospectively recruited patients with CM who underwent galcanezumab injections between December 2019 and February 2022. Treatment response was determined after three months of follow-up and was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days. The migraine characteristics, comorbidities, and other treatment responses were compared between the responder and non-responder groups. RESULTS Of 238 patients with CM, 153 (64.3%) showed treatment response. The responder group was younger, had lower frequency of baseline headache days, and had more accompanying symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and photophobia. Better triptan response and less depression were also observed in the responder group. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the everyday headache (OR = 0.351, 95% CI = 0.133-0.874, p = 0.017), depression (OR = 0.439, 95% CI = 0.216-0.896, p = 0.024) and absence of accompanying symptoms (OR = 0.314, 95% CI = 0.118-0.834, p = 0.020) were significantly associated with response to galcanezumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our real-world data showed the efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with CM, regardless of medication overuse. Everyday headache, presence of depression, and absence of accompanying symptoms of migraine were significant predictors of a poor response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyoung Cheol Lee
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, 01830, Korea
| | - Soohyun Cho
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Byung-Kun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, 01830, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Giffin NJ. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies for migraine. Pract Neurol 2023; 23:200-207. [PMID: 36754606 DOI: 10.1136/pn-2022-003592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies represents a step forward in preventive migraine treatment as the first agents to target the underlying pathogenesis of migraine. In trials they act more quickly, have better long-term adherence and appear to be better tolerated than other treatments. Major disadvantages are their high cost and unknown safety in pregnancy and in cardiovascular disease. To mitigate these concerns, they should be used according to guidance produced by professional bodies, with defined starting and stopping criteria. We do not yet know whether they are more effective than standard care; many patients may still be better treated by other means, in particular addressing lifestyle factors and medication-overuse headache.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a secondary headache disorder attributed to overuse of acute headache medications by a person with an underlying headache disorder, usually migraine or tension-type headache. MOH is common among individuals with 15 or more headache days per month. Although MOH is associated with substantial disability and reductions in quality of life, this condition is often under-recognized. As MOH is both preventable and treatable, it warrants greater attention and awareness. The diagnosis of MOH is based on the history and an unremarkable neurological examination, and is made according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition (ICHD-3). Pathophysiological mechanisms of MOH include altered descending pain modulation, central sensitization and biobehavioural factors. Treatment of MOH includes the use of headache preventive therapies, but essential to success is eliminating the cause, by reducing the frequency of use of acute headache medication, and perhaps withdrawing the overused medication altogether. Appropriate treatment is usually highly effective, leading to reduced headache burden and acute medication consumption.
Collapse
|
24
|
Schiano di Cola F, Ceccardi G, Bolchini M, Caratozzolo S, Liberini P, Padovani A, Rao R. Photophobia and migraine outcome during treatment with galcanezumab. Front Neurol 2023; 13:1088036. [PMID: 36742057 PMCID: PMC9889984 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1088036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a pivotal role in migraine physiology, not only regarding migraine pain but also associated symptoms such as photophobia. The aim of the present study was to assess monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP efficacy not only in terms of headache and migraine frequency and disability but also in reducing ictal photophobia. Material and methods This is a retrospective observational study, conducted at the Headache Center-ASST Spedali Civili Brescia. All patients in monthly treatment with galcanezumab with at least a 6-month follow-up in September 2022 with reported severe photophobia during migraine attacks were included. Data regarding headache frequency, analgesics consumption, and migraine disability were collected quarterly. Moreover, patients were asked the following information regarding photophobia: (1) whether they noticed an improvement in photophobia during migraine attacks since galcanezumab introduction; (2) the degree of photophobia improvement (low, moderate, and high); and (3) timing photophobia improvement. Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled in the present study as they met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen patients had a diagnosis of high-frequency episodic migraine and 30 of chronic migraine. From baseline to T3 and T6, a significant improvement in terms of headache days (19.2 ± 7.6 vs. 8.6 ± 6.8 vs. 7.7 ± 5.7; p < 0.0001), migraine days (10.4 ± 6.7 vs. 2.9 ± 4.3 vs. 3.6 ± 2.8; p < 0.0001), analgesics consumption (25.1 ± 28.2 vs. 7.6 ± 7.5 vs. 7.6 ± 8.1; p < 0.0001), MIDAS score (82.1 ± 48.4 vs. 21.6 ± 17.6 vs. 18.1 ± 20.5; p < 0.0001), and HIT-6 score (66.2 ± 6.2 vs. 57.2 ± 8.6 vs. 56.6 ± 7.6; p < 0.0001) was found. Thirty-two patients (68.1%) reported a significant improvement in ictal photophobia, with over half of the patients reporting it within the first month of treatment. Photophobia improvement was more frequent in patients with episodic migraine (p = 0.02) and triptans responders (p = 0.03). Conclusions The present study confirms previous reports regarding galcanezumab efficacy beyond migraine frequency. In particular, over 60% of patients, in our cohort, documented a significant improvement also in reducing ictal photophobia. This improvement was, in most patients, moderate to high, and within the first 6 months of treatment, regardless of the clinical response on migraine frequency.
Collapse
|
25
|
Krymchantowski AV, Jevoux C, Krymchantowski AG, Silva-Néto RP. Monoclonal antibodies for chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: A real-world study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1129439. [PMID: 36937507 PMCID: PMC10022428 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1129439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Medication-overuse headache is highly prevalent in tertiary care centers. It may be a cause or consequence of the overuse of symptomatic medications for migraine attacks. Objective We aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) added to conventional pharmacological treatments in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH). Methods A cross-sectional, prospective, randomized, open study with real-world comparison groups of patients was carried out. The sample consisted of 200 patients with CM and MOH, who received the same approach to withdraw overused medications, started preventative treatment, and either did or did not receive mAbs. Results A total of 172 patients (126 women and 46 men) were included in the study and divided into two groups: group one consisting of 58 patients (control) and group two of 114 patients who used mAbs added to conventional pharmacological agents. The mean age was 44.1 ± 13.6 years, ranging from 18 to 78 years. In the 3 months follow-up after starting the treatment, both groups presented headache frequency reduction, but those with monoclonal antibodies had a significantly higher reduction in the number of headache days and symptomatic medication intake when compared to the control (p < 0.0001). Conclusions The addition of an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody to the treatment for medication overuse headaches in chronic migraineurs may result in decreasing headache frequency and symptomatic medication use when compared to conventional treatments with drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carla Jevoux
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center of Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Raimundo Pereira Silva-Néto
- Department of Neurology, Federal University of the Parnaíba Delta, Parnaíba, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Raimundo Pereira Silva-Néto
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Diener HC, Rizzoli P. Chronic migraine and medication overuse. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 198:187-200. [PMID: 38043961 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823356-6.00008-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Though clearly described as far back as the 17th century, chronic migraine has defied precise categorization and has continued to develop as an important diagnostic concept with significant societal impact. Worldwide prevalence is estimated to be between 1% and 3%, and these patients form a dynamic group cycling between chronic and episodic migraine. Theories of pathogenesis are developing supported by recent imaging and other findings. Of the many determinants of progression to chronic migraine, overuse of acute abortive headache medications may be one of the most important modifiable factors. Treatment strategies, in addition to educational measures, have included various preventive migraine medications such as topiramate, valproate, and onabotulinumtoxinA. CGRP monoclonal antibodies are efficacious for the management of chronic migraine both with and without medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Christoph Diener
- Department of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Paul Rizzoli
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; John R Graham Headache Center, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pavelic AR, Wöber C, Riederer F, Zebenholzer K. Monoclonal Antibodies against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide for Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review of Real-World Data. Cells 2022; 12:cells12010143. [PMID: 36611935 PMCID: PMC9819019 DOI: 10.3390/cells12010143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of real-world outcomes for anti-CGRP-mAbs. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed for real-world data of erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, or eptinezumab in patients with migraines. RESULTS We identified 134 publications (89 retrospective), comprising 10 pharmaco-epidemiologic and 83 clinic-based studies, 38 case reports, and 3 other articles. None of the clinic-based studies provided follow-up data over more than one year in more than 200 patients. Findings suggest that there are reductions in health insurance claims and days with sick-leave as well as better treatment adherence with anti-CGRP-mAbs. Effectiveness, reported in 77 clinic-based studies, was comparable to randomized controlled trials. A treatment pause was associated with an increase in migraine frequency, and switching to another antibody resulted in a better response in some of the patients. Adverse events and safety issues were addressed in 86 papers, including 24 single case reports. CONCLUSION Real-world data on anti-CGRP-mAbs are limited by retrospective data collection, small patient numbers, and short follow-up periods. The majority of papers seem to support good effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP-mAbs in the real-world setting. There is an unmet need for large prospective real-world studies providing long-term follow-ups of patients treated with anti-CGRP-mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antun R. Pavelic
- Department of Neurology, Hietzing Hospital, 1130 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Wöber
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences & Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Correspondence:
| | - Franz Riederer
- Department of Neurology, Hietzing Hospital, 1130 Vienna, Austria
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karin Zebenholzer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences & Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kaltseis K, Hamann T, Gaul C, Broessner G. Is prednisone still a reasonable option in the treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache in the age of CGRP antibodies? A narrative review. Headache 2022; 62:1264-1271. [PMID: 36437611 PMCID: PMC10100419 DOI: 10.1111/head.14415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Along with the development of novel migraine therapies as the monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor, the question arises if the treatment of chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH) must be reconsidered. Have previous therapeutic approaches, including glucocorticoids, lost their role in the management of this debilitating disorder? In this narrative review, we present an overview of the available treatment options in CM and MOH in light of CGRP antibodies as well as an evaluation of the role of glucocorticoids in withdrawal therapy. BACKGROUND Chronic migraine and medication overuse continues to be a difficult to treat condition. To date, potent treatment options are scarce and algorithms for advising patients with MOH are often still based on expert consensus rather than evidence-based medicine. For years and probably due to lack of effective alternatives, glucocorticoids have been used in MOH, especially to alleviate withdrawal symptoms caused by detoxification. Small case series report positive effects of steroids in this respective patient group; however, randomized controlled trials did not show a consistent benefit, although this may be due to methodological limitations. Because of these discrepancies, their role in MOH has been under debate ever since. METHODS We searched the electronic database PubMed for articles up to June 1, 2022 on the use of glucocorticoids in CM and MOH. CONCLUSION Despite popular use in clinical practice, there is currently still no scientific evidence for the efficacy of glucocorticoids in patients with CM and MOH. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies achieved high transition rates from medication overuse to non-overuse. However, further research is needed to evaluate the additional benefit of these new agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kaltseis
- Department of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Till Hamann
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center North-East, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Charly Gaul
- Headache Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregor Broessner
- Department of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Diener HC, Kropp P, Dresler T, Evers S, Förderreuther S, Gaul C, Holle-Lee D, May A, Niederberger U, Moll S, Schankin C, Lampl C. Management of medication overuse (MO) and medication overuse headache (MOH) S1 guideline. Neurol Res Pract 2022; 4:37. [PMID: 36031642 PMCID: PMC9422154 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-022-00200-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Chronic headache due to the overuse of medication for the treatment of migraine attacks has a prevalence of 0.5–2.0%. This guideline provides guidance for the management of medication overuse (MO) and medication overuse headache (MOH).
Recommendations
Treatment of headache due to overuse of analgesics or specific migraine medications involves several stages. Patients with medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) should be educated about the relationship between frequent use of symptomatic headache medication and the transition from episodic to chronic migraine (chronification), with the aim of reducing and limiting the use of acute medication. In a second step, migraine prophylaxis should be initiated in patients with migraine and overuse of analgesics or specific migraine drugs. Topiramate, onabotulinumtoxinA and the monoclonal antibodies against CGRP or the CGRP-receptor are effective in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse. In patients with tension-type headache, prophylaxis is performed with amitriptyline. Drug prophylaxis should be supplemented by non-drug interventions. For patients in whom education and prophylactic medication are not effective, pausing acute medication is recommended. This treatment can be performed in an outpatient, day hospital or inpatient setting. Patients with headache due to overuse of opioids should undergo inpatient withdrawal. The success rate of the stepped treatment approach is 50–70% after 6 to 12 months. A high relapse rate is observed in patients with opioid overuse. Tricyclic antidepressants, neuroleptics (antiemetics) and the administration of steroids are recommended for the treatment of withdrawal symptoms or headaches during the medication pause. Consistent patient education and further close monitoring reduce the risk of relapse.
Collapse
|
30
|
Rattanawong W, Rapoport A, Srikiatkhachorn A. Neurobiology of migraine progression. NEUROBIOLOGY OF PAIN (CAMBRIDGE, MASS.) 2022; 12:100094. [PMID: 35720639 PMCID: PMC9204797 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2022.100094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Chronic migraine is one of the most devastating headache disorders. The estimated prevalence is 1.4-2.2% in the population. The factors which may predispose to the process of migraine progression include high frequency of migraine attacks, medication overuse, comorbid pain syndromes, and obesity. Several studies showed that chronic migraine results in the substantial anatomical and physiological changes in the brain. Despite no clear explanation regarding the pathophysiologic process leading to the progression, certain features such as increased sensory sensitivity, cutaneous allodynia, impaired habituation, identify the neuronal hyperexcitability as the plausible mechanism. In this review, we describe two main mechanisms which can lead to this hyperexcitability. The first is persistent sensitization caused by repetitive and prolonged trigeminal nociceptive activation. This process results in changes in several brain networks related to both pain and non-pain behaviours. The second mechanism is the decrease in endogenous brainstem inhibitory control, hence increasing the excitability of neurons in the trigeminal noceptive system and cerebral cortex. The combination of increased pain matrix connectivity, including hypothalamic hyperactivity and a weak serotonergic system, may contribute to migraine chronification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanakorn Rattanawong
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 10520, Thailand
| | - Alan Rapoport
- Department of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Anan Srikiatkhachorn
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 10520, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Begasse de Dhaem O, Rizzoli P. Refractory Headaches. Semin Neurol 2022; 42:512-522. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMedication overuse headache (MOH), new daily persistent headache (NDPH), and persistent refractory headache attributed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection represent a significant burden in terms of disability and quality of life, and a challenge in terms of definition, pathophysiology, and treatment. Regarding MOH, prevention without withdrawal is not inferior to prevention with withdrawal. Preventive medications like topiramate, onabotulinumtoxinA, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies improve chronic migraine with MOH regardless of withdrawal. The differential diagnosis of NDPH is broad and should be carefully examined. There are no guidelines for the treatment of NDPH, but options include a short course of steroids, nerve blocks, topiramate, nortriptyline, gabapentin, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, and onabotulinumtoxinA. The persistence of headache 3 months after SARS-CoV2 infection is a predictor of poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Begasse de Dhaem
- Headache Specialist at Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut
- Department of Neurology at the University of Connecticut, Milford, Connecticut
| | - Paul Rizzoli
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital J Graham Headache Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Reducing the Burden of Migraine: Safety and Efficacy of CGRP Pathway-Targeted Preventive Treatments. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154359. [PMID: 35955976 PMCID: PMC9369309 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a highly disabling and often chronic neurological disease that affects more than one billion people globally. Preventive migraine treatment is recommended for individuals who have frequent and/or disabling attacks; however, many of the medications used for migraine prevention (e.g., antiepileptics, antidepressants, antihypertensives) were not specifically developed for migraine, and often have limited efficacy or poor tolerability. Four monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, which is believed to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of migraine, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. All four migraine-specific treatments have demonstrated efficacy based on reductions in monthly days with migraine for patients with both episodic and chronic migraine, including those with comorbidities. They have also demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Based on these accounts, CGRP pathway-targeted monoclonal antibodies have the potential to revolutionize preventive treatment for patients with migraine.
Collapse
|
33
|
Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Martelletti P, Mitsikostas DD, Ornello R, Reuter U, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt G, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Lampl C. European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:67. [PMID: 35690723 PMCID: PMC9188162 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A previous European Headache Federation (EHF) guideline addressed the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway to prevent migraine. Since then, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence have expanded the evidence and knowledge for those treatments. Therefore, the EHF panel decided to provide an updated guideline on the use of those treatments. Methods The guideline was developed following the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The working group identified relevant questions, performed a systematic review and an analysis of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Where the GRADE approach was not applicable, expert opinion was provided. Results We found moderate to high quality of evidence to recommend eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in individuals with episodic and chronic migraine. For several important clinical questions, we found not enough evidence to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance relied on experts’ opinion. Nevertheless, we provided updated suggestions regarding the long-term management of those treatments and their place with respect to the other migraine preventatives. Conclusion Monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are recommended for migraine prevention as they are effective and safe also in the long-term. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences - University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neurorehabilitation/Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina I Deligianni
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Christian Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany.,University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Dimos-Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences - University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Gisela Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Uluduz
- Department of Neurology Istanbul Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair, Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology, Headache Medical Center at the Konventhospital BHB Linz, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Therapies targeting CGRP signaling for medication overuse headache. Curr Opin Neurol 2022; 35:353-359. [PMID: 35674079 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medication overuse headache (MOH) affects more than 60 million individuals worldwide causing enormous personal and social burden. Only repurposed drugs are available for MOH that share limited evidence for efficacy. The preclinical data suggesting that activation of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway is involved in headache chronification along with clinical evidence that monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) have good efficacy in preventing chronic migraine, triggered this review that aims to summarize the current data on the effectiveness and safety of mAbs against CGRP in MOH. RECENT FINDINGS Post hoc analyses of phase-3 trials of erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab for the prevention of chronic migraine revealed that patients with MOH benefit from the treatment over placebo. Several real-world studies confirm the efficacy of erenumab and galcanezumab in patients with MO. However, all published trials evaluated treatments in patients with chronic migraine with MO collectively, not in patients with MOH exclusively. SUMMARY The available data indicate that anti-CGRP mAbs represent a good mechanism-based and disease-specific therapeutical option with for MOH as long as detoxification and additional nonpharmaceutical interventions are operated. Future research should focus on long-term-controlled trials in MOH populations exclusively.
Collapse
|
35
|
Wang YF, Wang SJ. CGRP Targeting Therapy for Chronic Migraine-Evidence from Clinical Trials and Real-world Studies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:543-554. [PMID: 35567661 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01056-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor have become part of the standard treatment for migraine in clinical practice. The current review focuses on the clinical evidence of CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with chronic migraine (CM), including more challenging cases. RECENT FINDINGS CGRP monoclonal antibodies were more effective than placebo in reducing the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs), and the change relative to placebo in the treatment group was between - 1.2 and - 2.7 days at 3 months. CGRP monoclonal antibodies resulted in ≥ 50% response in 27.5 to 61.4% of patients, and doubled the odds for having ≥ 50% response. The findings were generally consistent in patients with coexisting medication overuse or with treatment failures to multiple preventive medications, including onabotulinumtoxinA. The results from real-world studies (RWS) were similar to those seen in clinical trials, and the changes from baseline in the number of MMDs and the response rates largely fell within the ranges of those reported in the treatment group in pivotal trials. The therapeutic effects typically started within a few days, and remained steady after regular treatment for up to 1 year. These agents were generally well tolerated, and the discontinuation rates due to adverse events in clinical trials and in many RWS were < 4.5%. CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with CM, including clinical challenging cases. However, the role of CGRP monoclonal antibodies in a number of conditions, such as cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, pregnancy, and overuse of opioids or barbiturates, needs to be further clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Feng Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shi-Pai Road, Bei-Tou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan. .,College of Medicine National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shi-Pai Road, Bei-Tou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.,College of Medicine National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cohen F, Yuan H, Silberstein SD. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies and Antagonists in Migraine: Current Evidence and Rationale. BioDrugs 2022; 36:341-358. [PMID: 35476215 PMCID: PMC9043885 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00530-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37 amino-acid neuropeptide found mostly in peptidergic sensory C-fibers, has been suggested to be implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine, which is one of the most common neurological disorders seen in medical practice, affecting almost 16% of the US population. While previously thought to be a vascular condition, migraine attacks are the result of neurogenic inflammation and peripheral/central sensitization through dysfunctional activation of the trigeminovascular system. To date, two classes of therapeutic agents have been developed to interrupt the function of CGRP: CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule antagonists (gepants). There are currently four CGRP-targeted mAbs and three gepants that are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of migraine. Multiple phase II and III studies have established the efficacies and tolerability of these treatments. Previously, we reviewed the fundamental role of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Here, we discuss in depth the clinical evidence (randomized controlled trials and real-world studies), safety, and tolerability of CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants for treating migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kubota GT. It is time anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies be considered first-line prophylaxis for migraine. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:218-226. [PMID: 35976302 PMCID: PMC9491437 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2022-s112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The result of more than thirty years of research, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are currently the state of the art for migraine preventive therapy. Their efficacy and safety, supported by an already large and growing body of evidence, are added by many other advantages: an early onset of action, favorable posology, negligible pharmacological interaction, and a broad-reaching efficacy in many challenging clinical contexts. When compared to standard prophylactics, these novel medications seem at least as efficacious, clearly more tolerable and, consequently, with a superior adherence profile. Furthermore, recently published analyses indicate that they are cost-effective, especially among those with chronic migraine. Yet, current guidelines endorse their use only after multiple other preventives have failed or have been deemed not tolerable. Although this recommendation may have been sensible at first, the now available data strongly point that time has come for anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies to be acknowledged as first-line treatments for migraine patients with severe disability. For these individuals, delaying treatment until several other alternatives have failed incurs in significant losses, both economically and to many relevant aspects of their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Taricani Kubota
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cohen F, Yuan H, DePoy EMG, Silberstein SD. The Arrival of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:922-930. [PMID: 35426060 PMCID: PMC9294119 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01230-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Remarkable advancements have been made in the field of migraine pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy over the past decade. Understanding the molecular mechanism of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has led to the discovery of a novel class of drugs, CGRP functional blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), for migraine prevention. CGRP is a neuropeptide inherently involved in migraine physiology where its receptors are found dispersed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. CGRP-targeted mAbs are effective in the preventive treatment of both chronic and episodic migraine. The advantages of mAbs over oral migraine preventives are numerous. Favorable attributes of the mAbs include high affinity and selectivity for CGRP molecular targets, long-circulating plasma half-lives, and limited risk for nonspecific hepatic and renal toxicity. This pharmacological profile leads to fewer off-target (side) effects and drug-drug interactions rendering mAbs an attractive alternative to traditional small molecule therapies, especially for the preventive treatment of migraine. MAbs display minimal drug interaction thus are excellent for patients prescribed with multiple medications. However, the long-term safety of CGRP blockade is incompletely known, and CGRP mAbs use should be avoided during pregnancy. CGRP mAbs represent a radical shift in preventing chronic and episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - E M G DePoy
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, Costa CM, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Favoni V, Lovati C, Bertuzzo D, d'Onofrio F, Doretti A, Di Fiore P, Finocchi C, Schiano Di Cola F, Ranieri A, Colombo B, Bono F, Albanese M, Cevoli S, Barbanti P. Rapid response to galcanezumab and predictive factors in chronic migraine patients: A 3-month observational, longitudinal, cohort, multicenter, Italian real-life study. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:1198-1208. [PMID: 34826192 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A rapid response to preventive therapy is of pivotal importance in severely disabled patients with chronic migraine (CM) and diverse preventive treatment failures. This prospective, observational, multicenter real-life study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of galcanezumab in the first 3 months of treatment of CM patients at 14 Italian headache centers. METHODS All consecutive adult patients with CM diagnosis with the clinical indication for galcanezumab were considered. We collected patients' baseline characteristics, monthly headache days, monthly painkiller intake, migraine clinical characteristics, and disability scale scores during a 1-month run-in period (baseline) and the first 3 months of therapy. Possible predictive factors of treatment were considered. RESULTS A total of 156 patients (82.4% female, aged 47.3 ± 12.3 years) were enrolled. The 65 (41.7%) patients with a consecutive ≥50% response rate (RR) in the 3 months of therapy presented a lower body mass index (p = 0.004) and more frequently presented unilateral migraine pain (p = 0.002) and good response to triptans (p = 0.003). Persistent conversion from CM to episodic migraine was observed in 55.8% (87/156) of patients. They more frequently presented a good response to triptans (p = 0.003) and unilateral pain (p = 0.046). At baseline, 131 of 156 (83.9%) patients presented medication overuse (MO). Of these, 61.8% (81/131) no longer displayed MO consistently during the 3 months. These patients were more frequently responders to triptans (p = 0.002) and less frequently suffered from gastrointestinal comorbidity (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Unilateral pain, good response to triptans, and normal weight may be associated with a persistent positive response in the first 3 months of therapy with galcanezumab in CM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Cinzia Aurilia
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Fofi
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- Bologna Institute of Neurological Sciences, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Lovati
- Neurology Unit, Headache Center, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Doretti
- Department of Neurology, Stroke Unit and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Italian Auxological Institute, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Di Fiore
- Headache Center, Neurology and Stroke Unit, S. Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Cinzia Finocchi
- San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Schiano Di Cola
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Angelo Ranieri
- Headache Center, Neurology and Stroke Unit, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- San Raffaele Hospital, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Bono
- Center for Headache and Intracranial Pressure Disorders, Neurology Unit, Mater Domini University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Maria Albanese
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.,Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- Bologna Institute of Neurological Sciences, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Bologna, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy.,San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kwon S, Gil YE, Lee MJ. Real-world efficacy of galcanezumab for the treatment of migraine in Korean patients. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:705-714. [PMID: 35301884 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221076481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We aimed to provide real-world data on the effectiveness of an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody administered for treating migraine in Korean patients. METHODS We prospectively recruited patients with migraine who received galcanezumab treatment at a single university hospital from June 2020 to April 2021. The treatment response was assessed after three consecutive monthly injections. A 50% responder rate was evaluated based on ≥50% reduction in the number of moderate/severe headache days. RESULTS Overall, 87 patients were included in the analysis. Most patients were women (83.9%). They had a mean age of 41.7 ± 12.3 years (range 17-72). Sixty-five patients (74.7%) had chronic migraine, 35 patients (40.2%) had a history of medication-overuse headache, and 32 patients (36.8%) were previously unresponsive to or found intolerable five classes of preventive medication. After three months of treatment, mean changes in numbers of monthly headache days, moderate/severe headache days, crystal clear days, and days of acute medication use were -7.2 ± 8.43, -4.3 ± 9.76, 7.3 ± 8.50, and -4.1 ± 7.93, respectively. The 50% responder rates were 58.3%, 44.2%, and 40.6% for patients with unsuccessful previous use of 0-1, 2-4, and 5 preventive medication classes, respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 and Migraine Disability Assessment Test scores also decreased (-4.4 ± 8.09 and -32.9 ± 77.04, respectively). CONCLUSION In our cohort, the effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab were comparable with those reported in clinical trials, whereas a higher response rate was observed in the difficult-to-treat patient subset than that reported in trials. We provide real-world evidence of galcanezumab treatment benefits in Asian patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soonwook Kwon
- Department of Neurology, 65745Inha University Hospital, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Young-Eun Gil
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pensato U, Baraldi C, Favoni V, Mascarella D, Matteo E, Andrini G, Cainazzo MM, Cortelli P, Pierangeli G, Guerzoni S, Cevoli S. Detoxification vs non-detoxification before starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody in medication overuse headache. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:645-653. [PMID: 35135357 PMCID: PMC9109244 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211067791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Medication overuse headache significantly contributes to the chronification process and treatment refractoriness of migraine. Currently, abrupt discontinuation of the overused medication still represents the best management strategy for these patients, challenging public health system resources. Methods In this prospective study, chronic migraine and medication overuse headache sufferers with at least 28 days of analgesic consumption per month were included. Assessment of efficacy outcomes at three months were compared among patients who underwent in-hospital abrupt discontinuation of overused acute medication (YES-DETOX group) and patients who did not (NO-DETOX group) before starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody. Results Of 401 patients who received either erenumab or galcanezumab, 28% (n = 111) satisfied inclusion criteria (YES-DETOX n = 28; NO-DETOX n = 83). After three months of treatment, 59% (n = 65; 47/83 YES-DETOX; 18/28 NO-DETOX) patients reverted from medication overuse headache and 51% (n = 57; 42/83 YES-DETOX; 15/28 NO-DEOTX) achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly headache days; yet no statistical differences were observed between the two groups (p = 0.4788 and p = 0.8393, respectively). Monthly consumption of pain medication was the only baseline prognostic factor in multivariate analysis in the overall cohort (p = 0.016). Conclusion Our results support the emerging evidence that anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies may be effective in medication overuse headache patients irrespective of detoxification, yet further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Pensato
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide Mascarella
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Matteo
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgia Andrini
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Michela Cainazzo
- Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pietro Cortelli
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Pierangeli
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pijpers JA, Kies DA, van Zwet EW, Rosendaal FR, Terwindt GM. Behavioural intervention in medication overuse headache: a concealed double‐blind randomised controlled trial a concealed double‐blind randomised controlled trial a concealed double‐blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:1496-1504. [PMID: 35064733 PMCID: PMC9306639 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Medication overuse headache is a prevalent disorder, with a strong biobehavioural component. Hence, behavioural interventions might effectuate reduction of the overused medication. We assessed in a double‐blind manner the efficacy of a behavioural intervention during medication withdrawal therapy. Methods In this concealed, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial in medication overuse headache, conducted at the Leiden University Medical Centre, we compared the effect of maximal versus minimal behavioural intervention by a headache nurse during withdrawal therapy. Maximal intervention consisted of an intensive contact schedule, comprising education, motivational interviewing, and value‐based activity planning during 12 weeks of withdrawal therapy. Minimal intervention consisted of a short contact only. Patients were unaware of the existence of these treatment arms, as the trial was concealed in another trial investigating botulinum toxin A. Endpoints were successful withdrawal and monthly days of acute medication use after the withdrawal period. Results We enrolled 179 patients (90 maximal, 89 minimal intervention). At Week 12, most patients achieved withdrawal in both groups (82/90 [93%] maximal intervention vs. 75/89 [86%] minimal intervention, odds ratio = 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83–7.23, p = 0.107). At Week 24, patients in the maximal intervention group had fewer medication days (mean difference = −2.23, 95% CI = −3.76 to −0.70, p = 0.005). This difference receded over time. Change in monthly migraine days did not differ between groups (−6.75 vs. −6.22). Conclusions This trial suggests modest benefit of behavioural intervention by a headache nurse during withdrawal therapy for medication overuse headache, to reduce acute medication use during and shortly after intervention, but extension seems warranted for a prolonged effect
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Pijpers
- Dept. Neurology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Kies
- Dept. Neurology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
- Dept. Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Erik W van Zwet
- Dept. Medical Statistics Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Frits R. Rosendaal
- Dept. Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Dept. Neurology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hamann T, Rimmele F, Jürgens TP. [CGRP antibodies in migraine prophylaxis : The new standard in migraine treatment?]. Schmerz 2022; 36:59-72. [PMID: 35041064 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-021-00613-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is associated with a high individual level of suffering. Therefore, an effective preventive treatment is highly important. The spectrum of classical prophylactic drugs has now been expanded to include monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor. These antibodies have shown reliable efficacy compared to placebo and a rapid onset of action with a low rate of side effects and negligible interactions in pivotal studies. Recently, the efficacy of the antibody was shown in many studies even on drug-refractory migraine and migraine associated with medication overuse. Comprehensive head to head comparisons with previously established drugs and among the antibodies are not yet available; however, initial studies suggest better tolerability and efficacy compared to conventional drugs and other antibodies. The role of antibodies in established treatment cascades still needs to be clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Hamann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopfschmerzzentrum Nord-Ost, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.
| | - Florian Rimmele
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopfschmerzzentrum Nord-Ost, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Tim Patrick Jürgens
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopfschmerzzentrum Nord-Ost, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.,Neurologisches Zentrum, Klinik für Neurologie, KMG Klinikum Güstrow, Güstrow, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Al-Hassany L, Goadsby PJ, Danser AHJ, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting drugs for migraine: how pharmacology might inform treatment decisions. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:284-294. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00409-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
45
|
Park HK, Cho SJ. Comprehensive approach for the treatment of medication-overuse headache. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.12.843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as a headache in patients with a pre-existing primary headache disorder that occurs on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months. It is caused by overuse of medication for acute or symptomatic headache treatment. Regular and frequent use of acute or symptomatic medications can worsen headaches and lead to chronic headache or MOH. MOH is a burdensome medical condition that is difficult to treat, and the frequent recurrence of headaches may result in disability in individuals and impair socioeconomic outcomes.Current Concepts: Awareness of MOH and the education of patients, the general population, and healthcare providers are important for the first step of treatment. Scientific research regarding the treatment of MOH has been published in the past few years.Discussion and Conclusion: Physicians should educate and counsel patients to stop or at least reduce the intake of acute or symptomatic medications that can be discontinued abruptly or tapered slowly. During the period after the discontinuation of the overused medications, some withdrawal symptoms including headache might be manageable with bridging therapy. Evidence-based preventive therapies including anticonvulsants (topiramate and divalproex sodium), botulinum toxin A, and medications acting by antagonism of the calcitonin generelated peptide pathway might be helpful in patients with MOH for both avoiding the overused medication and preventing the relapse of overuse. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach may improve the outcomes of patients with MOH.
Collapse
|
46
|
Fenton C, Lee A. Educate patients with medication overuse headache, and intervene, when necessary. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-021-00878-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
47
|
Park HK, Chu MK, Oh SY, Moon HS, Song TJ, Lee MJ, Kang JJ, Hong Y, Cho SJ. Interim analysis of the Registry for Load and Management of Medication Overuse Headache (RELEASE): A multicenter, comprehensive medication overuse headache registry. Cephalalgia 2021; 42:455-465. [PMID: 34786971 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211057184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characteristics, disabilities, and optimal management of medication overuse headache remain uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics of patients with medication overuse headache enrolled in a medication overuse headache registry in Korea. METHODS The Registry for Load and Management of MEdicAtion OveruSE Headache (RELEASE), a cross-sectional prospective observational study including seven referral headache centers in Korea, started enrolling adult patients with medication overuse headache in April 2020. Data included information on headache characteristics, burden on daily function, depression, anxiety, history of acute and preventive medications, and treatment strategies. RESULTS A total of 229 patients (85.6% females; mean age, 45.5 ± 13.5 years) were enrolled by June 2021. The average durations of chronic headaches and medication overuse were 6.5 and 4.3 years, respectively. In the past month before enrollment, patients had headaches for 25 days and severe headaches for 12 days, and used acute medications for 20 days. Patients were disabled in 66.8 days in the past 3 months and had moderate/severe depression and anxiety in 56% and 35%, respectively. The proportion of patients on preventive treatments increased from 38% to 93% during the study period. CONCLUSIONS RELEASE study reflects the current management status and opportunities to improve the quality of care in patients with medication overuse headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Kyun Park
- Department of Neurology, 119750Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Min Kyung Chu
- Department of Neurology, 54678Severance Hospital, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Oh
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Heui-Soo Moon
- Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Song
- Department of Neurology, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Ju Kang
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Yooha Hong
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lo Castro F, Guerzoni S, Pellesi L. Safety and Risk of Medication Overuse Headache in Lasmiditan and Second-Generation Gepants: A Rapid Review. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 2021; 13:233-240. [PMID: 34849034 PMCID: PMC8627250 DOI: 10.2147/dhps.s304373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of migraine is often complicated by insufficient headache relief, a miscellany of side effects and the risk of developing Medication Overuse Headache (MOH). Novel acute therapies have been recently developed and are now in the early post-marketing phase. Lasmiditan is a highly selective serotonin receptor agonist that binds to the 5-HT1F receptor, while ubrogepant and rimegepant antagonize the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. All three medications are now prescribed in a real-world setting, and an adequate level of knowledge is the starting point for rational use. In this rapid systematic review, we have established what is known about lasmiditan, ubrogepant and rimegepant, highlighting the most relevant safety aspects available from published studies and speculating about their risk of MOH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Lo Castro
- Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, Department of Specialized Medicine, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, Department of Specialized Medicine, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Lanfranco Pellesi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Correspondence: Lanfranco Pellesi Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkTel +45 53 80 30 56 Email
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Overeem LH, Peikert A, Hofacker MD, Kamm K, Ruscheweyh R, Gendolla A, Raffaelli B, Reuter U, Neeb L. Effect of antibody switch in non-responders to a CGRP receptor antibody treatment in migraine: A multi-center retrospective cohort study. Cephalalgia 2021; 42:291-301. [PMID: 34644203 PMCID: PMC8988456 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211048765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Switching between antibody classes might be a treatment option in migraine patients who have not responded to one class of a CGRP-(receptor) monoclonal antibody (mAb), but there are no efficacy data so far. In this real-world analysis, we assessed the treatment response to a CGRP-mAb in patients that have previously failed the CGRP-receptor-mAb erenumab. METHODS We analyzed retrospective headache diary data of 78 patients with migraine who switched between CGRP-mAbs classes at four German headache centers either due to lack of efficacy or intolerable side effects. Among these, we identified 25 patients who did not respond to erenumab after three treatment cycles (defined as <30% reduction of monthly headache days) and had complete headache documentation at least one month before and during both treatments. We assessed the ≥30% responder rate at month three after switching from erenumab to a CGRP-mAb (galcanezumab or fremanezumab) (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included ≥50% responder rate, monthly headache days, and monthly days with acute medication use. In an exploratory subgroup analysis patients were stratified for daily and non-daily headache. RESULTS The switch from erenumab to a CGRP-mAb led to a ≥30% response in one-third (32%) of the patients after three treatment cycles. A ≥50% response was achieved in 12% of the patients. Monthly headache days were reduced in month three compared to baseline (20.8 ± 7.1 to 17.8 ± 9.1; p = 0.009). Stratified analysis revealed that no patient with daily headache (n = 9) responded to the treatment switch, while a 30% response was achieved by 50% of patients with non-daily headache (n = 16). CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate that a relevant proportion of erenumab non-responders might benefit from a treatment switch to a CGRP-mAb. Switching seems to be a promising treatment option especially in migraine patients with non-daily headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maxi Dana Hofacker
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Lars Neeb
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine with medication overuse: real-life effectiveness and predictors of response at 6 months. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:120. [PMID: 34620085 PMCID: PMC8499507 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01328-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In daily practice, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) may be useful in chronic migraine (CM) with medication overuse (MO), but data is limited. We evaluated their effectiveness in a real-life clinical cohort. Methods This is a prospective study conducted in CM patients with and without medication overuse treated with monthly MAbs during 6 months (erenumab/galcanezumab). We collected headache characteristics, including acute medication intake, through an electronic diary. We compared patients (1) with and without MO at baseline, (2) with and without ongoing MO after treatment, defining MO resolution as < 10 or 15 days/month of acute medication intake, according to analgesic type, during the 6-month treatment. Results Of 139 CM patients completing 6-month treatment with anti-CGRP MAbs, 71.2% (99/139) had MO at baseline. After 6 months, patients with and without MO at baseline had significant and similar proportions of ≥50% reduction in migraine days/month (MO: 63.6% vs. non-MO: 57.5%, p = 0.500). 60.6% (60/99) no longer satisfied MO definition. Reduction in headache frequency compared to baseline occurred in both MO-ongoing and MO-resolution group, although those who stopped overusing had a greater improvement (headache days/month: − 13.4 ± 7.6 vs. -7.8 ± 7.2, p < 0.0001). No differences in MO resolution were observed according to the MAbs used. Baseline lower pain severity was associated with MO resolution (OR [95%]:0.236[0.054–0.975]; p = 0.049). Conclusions In real-life anti-CGRP MAbs are as effective in CM patients with MO as in patients without it and facilitate MO cessation. Reduction in headache frequency and acute medication days/month occurs regardless of whether patients stop overusing or not. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01328-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor José Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. .,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|