1
|
Hong JB, Israel-Willner H, Peikert A, Schanbacher P, Tozzi V, Köchling M, Reuter U, Raffaelli B. Therapeutic patterns and migraine disease burden in switchers of CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies - insights from the German NeuroTransData registry. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:90. [PMID: 38825722 PMCID: PMC11145812 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice. METHODS This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches. RESULTS Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group. CONCLUSION Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ja Bin Hong
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heike Israel-Willner
- Neurological Specialist Center Berlin (NFZB), Berlin, Germany.
- NeuroTransData, Neuburg, Germany.
| | - Andreas Peikert
- Neurologicum Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- NeuroTransData, Neuburg, Germany
| | - Peter Schanbacher
- Rewoso AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- Hochschule Furtwangen (HFU), Furtwangen, Germany
| | | | - Monika Köchling
- NeuroTransData, Neuburg, Germany
- NeuroCentrum, Grevenbroich & Dormagen, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moore L, Pakalnis A. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Inhibitors in the Treatment of Migraine in the Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: A Review. Pediatr Neurol 2024; 157:87-95. [PMID: 38905744 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
There are limited well-studied treatments for migraine in the pediatric population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors are an established safe and effective treatment in adults, and use may be appropriate for pediatric patients in certain clinical situations. We describe migraine pathophysiology as it relates to CGRP, provide an overview of available medications, and discuss clinical usage in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Moore
- Department of Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Ann Pakalnis
- Department of Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scheffler A, Wenzel P, Bendig M, Gendolla A, Basten J, Kleinschnitz C, Nsaka M, Lindner D, Naegel S, Burow P, Fleischmann R, Holle D. Effectiveness and tolerability of eptinezumab in treating patients with migraine resistant to conventional preventive medications and CGRP (receptor) antibodies: a multicentre retrospective real-world analysis from Germany. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:79. [PMID: 38755541 PMCID: PMC11097519 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eptinezumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP mAb) and is used for migraine prophylaxis. Efficacy data are mainly from clinical trials, real-world data are hardly available yet. Reimbursement policy in Germany leads to eptinezumab mainly being used in patients having failed pre-treatment with other CGRP mAb. To date, it is unclear whether eptinezumab is efficacious and well tolerated in this population and how the treatment response differs from patients who are naive to CGRP mAbs. METHODS We analysed clinical routine data of 79 patients (episodic migraine (EM): n = 19; chronic migraine (CM): n = 60) from four different centres in Germany. All patients were treated with eptinezumab (100mg). Differences in monthly headache (MHD), migraine (MMD) and acute medication days (AMD) after three months were analysed. The correlation of response with the number of CGRP mAb failures was evaluated. Significance level has been corrected (alpha = 0.017). RESULTS After three months MHD, MMD and AMD were significantly reduced. In EM, the median reduction for MHD was 4.0 days (IQR: -6.5 to -1.0; p = 0.001), for MMD 3.0 days (IQR: -5.5 to -1.5; p < 0.001) and for AMD 2.0 days (IQR: -5.0 to -0.5; p = 0.006). In CM, median reduction of MHD was 4 days (IQR: -8.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001), 3.0 days (IQR: -6.0 to-1.0; p < 0.001) for MMD and 1.0 day (IQR: -5.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001) for AMD. All patients were resistant to conventional preventive therapies and most to CGRP mAbs. Fourteen patients had never received a CGRP mAb and 65 patients had received at least one mAb without sufficient effectiveness and/or intolerability (one: n = 20, two: n = 28, three: n = 17). There was a significant association between the number of prior therapies and the 30% MHD responder rate (none: 78.6%, one: 45.0%, two: 32.1%, three: 23.5%, p = 0.010). Regarding tolerability, 10.4% (8/77) reported mild side effects. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of eptinezumab is significantly reduced in patients who have not previously responded to other CGRP mAbs. However, limitations such as the retrospective nature of the analysis, the small sample size and the short treatment period with only the lower dose of eptinezumab must be considered when interpreting the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Scheffler
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
| | - Pauline Wenzel
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Merle Bendig
- Department of Neurology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Jale Basten
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christoph Kleinschnitz
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Michael Nsaka
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Diana Lindner
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Steffen Naegel
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Department of Neurology, Alfried-Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Burow
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Dagny Holle
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Youn MS, Kim N, Lee MJ, Kim M. Treatment Outcome After Switching From Galcanezumab to Fremanezumab in Patients With Migraine. J Clin Neurol 2024; 20:300-305. [PMID: 38713076 PMCID: PMC11076194 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP-R) have been widely administered to patients with migraine who show inadequate responses to preventive medications. Among patients in whom a particular anti-CGRP-R mAb is ineffective, switching between different anti-CGRP-R mAbs can be the next option. Few studies have investigated treatment outcomes for antibody switching, especially between mAbs with the same target of the CGRP ligand. We aimed to determine the treatment outcome after switching between two anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab). METHODS We identified migraine patients in a prospective headache clinic registry who received galcanezumab for ≥3 months and were switched to fremanezumab for a further ≥3 months at a single university hospital. We defined a treatment response as a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with a moderate or severe headache at the third month of treatment relative to baseline. The treatment response after switching to fremanezumab was compared with the initial treatment response to galcanezumab. RESULTS Among 21 patients identified in the registry, 7 (33.3%) were initial responders to galcanezumab. After switching to fremanezumab, 7 (33.3%) showed a treatment response. The treatment response rate was 28.6% in the initial responders and 71.4% in the nonresponders to galcanezumab (p>0.999). CONCLUSIONS Switching between anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab) yielded a treatment outcome comparable to that reported previously when switching from an anti-CGRP-R mAb (erenumab) to an anti-CGRP mAb (galcanezumab or fremanezumab). The treatment response to fremanezumab seems to be independent of the prior treatment response to galcanezumab. Our findings suggest that switching to another anti-CGRP mAb can be considered when a particular anti-CGRP mAb is ineffective or intolerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Sojung Youn
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Namoh Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Manho Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wells-Gatnik WD, Martelletti P. Switching CGRP(r) MoAbs in migraine: what evidence? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:327-333. [PMID: 38726800 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2354386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 50% of patients that receive a CGRP(r) MoAb for the preventative treatment of migraine are expected to discontinue therapy. For patients that discontinue CGRP(r) MoAb therapy, few clinical options are available. One potential option is to switch CGRP(r) MoAbs, however, data concerning the efficacy of this intervention is scarce. AREAS COVERED This manuscript aims to summarize all available data concerning the potential efficacy of switching CGRP(r) MoAbs following previous medication discontinuation. Data was sourced by completing a database search for the terms: 'CGRP monoclonal antibody switch OR CGRP monoclonal antibody switching.' EXPERT OPINION While data considering the potential efficacy of CGRP(r) switching continues to grow, our expert opinion supports the most recent European Headache Federation statement regarding CGRP(r) MoAb prescribing practices, concluding that there remains insufficient data to determine the efficacy of this intervention. As this topic is of significant clinical importance, we recommend a call-to-action to expand on current data considering the therapeutic options for patients that discontinue CGRP(r) MoAb therapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Argoff C, Herzog SP, Smith RM, Kotak SV, Sopina L, Saltarska Y, Soni-Brahmbhatt S, Khan FA. Real-world effectiveness and satisfaction with intravenous eptinezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine: REVIEW, an observational, multi-site, US-based study. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:65. [PMID: 38664605 PMCID: PMC11044317 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01764-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent advancements in migraine treatment, some patients continue to endure significant disease burden. Due to the controlled nature of randomized trials in migraine prevention, many real-world patients with comorbidities or prior exposure to certain therapies are excluded. Capturing evidence of the effectiveness of treatment in real-world clinical settings can further shape treatment paradigms. The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive understanding of both patients' and physicians' real-world experiences with eptinezumab for chronic migraine (CM). METHODS REVIEW (Real-world EVidence and Insights into Experiences With eptinezumab) is an observational, multi-site (n = 4), US-based study designed to evaluate real-world experiences of patients treated with eptinezumab and their treating physicians. Patients were ≥ 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of CM, who had completed ≥ 2 consecutive eptinezumab infusion cycles (≥ 6 months of exposure). The study included a retrospective chart review, a patient survey, and a semi-structured physician interview that assessed patient and/or physician satisfaction with elements of daily living / well-being, migraine symptomology, and perspectives of the eptinezumab infusion experience. RESULTS Of the 94 patients enrolled, 83% (78/94) were female, the mean age was 49.2 years, and the mean time since migraine diagnosis was 15.4 years. Before eptinezumab treatment, patients experienced a mean of 8 self-reported "good" days/month, which increased to 18 after treatment. Most patients took, on average, ≥ 10 days/month of prescription and/or over-the-counter medication (81% [75/93] and 66% [61/93], respectively) to treat migraine attacks before eptinezumab treatment, which dropped to 26% (24/93) and 23% (21/93) following eptinezumab treatment. Prior to receiving eptinezumab, 62% (58/93) of patients indicated being at least slightly concerned about infusions; after eptinezumab infusion, this dropped to 14% (13/93). These patient survey findings were consistent with physician responses. CONCLUSION This real-world evidence study demonstrated high overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of eptinezumab treatment for CM among most patients and their physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Argoff
- Albany Medical Center, 47 New Scotland Ave, 12208, Albany, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fawad A Khan
- The McCasland Family Comprehensive Headache Center, Ochsner Neurosciences Institute, New Orleans, LA, USA
- University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Belvís R, Irimia P, González N, García-Ull J, Pozo-Rosich P, López-Bravo A, Morollón N, Quintas S, Plana A, Baz PG, Tentor A, Gallego Artiles N, León FJ, Pérez Martín M, Rivera I, Ramírez R, Colomina I, Lainez JM, Pascual J. Migraine treatment consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology (SEN), Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFYC), Society of Primary Care Medicine (SEMERGEN) and Spanish Association of Migraine and Headache (AEMICE) on migraine treatment. Med Clin (Barc) 2024:S0025-7753(24)00137-4. [PMID: 38643025 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a disease with a high prevalence and incidence, in addition to being highly disabling, causing a great impact on the patient's quality of life at a personal, family and work level, but also social, given its high expense due to its direct (care) and indirect (presenteeism and work absenteeism) costs. The multiple and recent developments in its pathophysiological knowledge and in its therapy require updating and, therefore, in this article the Spanish scientific societies most involved in its study and treatment (SEN, SEMFYC and SEMERGEN), together with the Association Spanish Association for Patients with Migraine and other Headaches (AEMICE), we have developed these updated care recommendations. We reviewed the treatment of migraine attacks, which consisted mainly of the use of NSAIDs and triptans, to which ditans and gepants have been added. We also discuss preventive treatment consisting of oral preventive drugs, botulinum toxin, and treatments that block the action of calcitonin-related peptide (CGRP). Finally, we emphasize that pharmacological treatments must be complementary to carrying out general measures consisting of identifying and managing/deletion the precipitating factors of the attacks and the chronicizing factors, controlling the comorbidities of migraine and eliminating analgesic overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Belvís
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España.
| | - Pablo Irimia
- Servicio de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Pamplona, España
| | - Nuria González
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario San Carlos. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Jésica García-Ull
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Unidad de Cefalea y Grupo de Investigación en Cefalea, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron y Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Alba López-Bravo
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Sección de Neurología, Hospital Reina Sofía. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS-A). Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Tudela, Navarra, España
| | - Noemí Morollón
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de La Princesa. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Antoni Plana
- ABS Balàfia-Pardinyes-Secà de Sant Pere de Lleida, Àmbit Lleida. Institut Català de la Salut (ICS). Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Lleida, España
| | | | | | | | - Francisco Javier León
- Centro de Salut Dúrcal, Distrito Sanitario Granada Metropolitano. Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Granada, España
| | | | - Inés Rivera
- C.S. Barranco Grande, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - Raquel Ramírez
- Servicio de Medicina de Familia, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, España
| | | | - José Miguel Lainez
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Julio Pascual
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria e IDIVAL. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Santander, España
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oliveira R, Gil-Gouveia R, Puledda F. CGRP-targeted medication in chronic migraine - systematic review. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:51. [PMID: 38575868 PMCID: PMC10996229 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01753-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine is a highly debilitating condition that is often difficult to manage, particularly in the presence of medication overuse headache. Drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or its receptor have shown promising results in treating this disorder. METHODS We searched Pubmed and Embase to identify randomized clinical trials and real-world studies reporting on the use of medication targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide in patients with chronic migraine. RESULTS A total of 270 records were identified. Nineteen studies qualified for the qualitative analysis. Most studies reported on monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs), that overall prove to be effective in decreasing monthly migraine days by half in about 27.6-61.4% of the patients. Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine was seen in 40.88% of the cases, and 29-88% of the patients stopped medication overuse. Obesity seems to be the main negative predictor of response to anti-CGRP mAbs. There is no evidence to suggest the superiority of one anti-CGRP mAb. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the combination of anti-CGRP medication with onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine is likely to bring benefits for resistant cases. Atogepant is the first gepant to demonstrate a significant decrease in monthly migraine days compared to placebo in a recent trial. Further, anti-CGRP mAb and gepants have a good safety profile. CONCLUSION There is strong evidence from randomized trials and real-world data to suggest that drugs targeting CGRP are a safe and effective treatment for chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Oliveira
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
- Neurology Department, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lipton RB. Preventive Treatment of Migraine. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024; 30:364-378. [PMID: 38568488 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article describes strategies for the preventive treatment of migraine including the emerging role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies and introduces novel paradigms for the preventive treatment of migraine. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Multiple migraine medications targeting CGRP have been introduced since 2018, including injectable monoclonal antibodies (ie, eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and oral small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (ie, ubrogepant, rimegepant, atogepant, and zavegepant). With the exceptions of ubrogepant and zavegepant, which are approved only as acute treatments, all of these agents have demonstrated efficacy in the preventive treatment of migraine; the monoclonal antibodies and atogepant have evidence of effectiveness in adults with either episodic or chronic migraine. The safety and tolerability profiles of CGRP-targeted therapies in migraine are favorable. ESSENTIAL POINTS The goals of preventive migraine therapy include reducing the frequency, severity, duration, and disability associated with attacks, reducing the need for acute treatment and the risk of medication overuse, enhancing self-efficacy and health-related quality of life, and reducing headache-related distress and interictal burden. Six drugs targeting CGRP (four monoclonal antibodies and two gepants) are now available for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults. The efficacy of CGRP-targeted medications in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine, together with good safety and tolerability, has led to the emergence of new approaches to preventive treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pellesi L, Ashina M, Martelletti P. Targeting the PACAP-38 pathway is an emerging therapeutic strategy for migraine prevention. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2024; 29:57-64. [PMID: 38337150 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2024.2317778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38) has emerged as a key mediator of migraine pathogenesis. PACAP-38 and its receptors are predominantly distributed in arteries, sensory and parasympathetic neurons of the trigeminovascular system. Phase 2 trials have tested human monoclonal antibodies designed to bind and inhibit PACAP-38 and the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide type I (PAC1) receptor for migraine prevention. AREAS COVERED This review focuses on the significance of the PACAP-38 pathway as a target in migraine prevention. English peer-reviewed articles were searched in PubMed, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases. EXPERT OPINION A PAC1 receptor monoclonal antibody was not effective for preventing migraine in a proof-of-concept trial, paving the way for alternative strategies to be considered. Lu AG09222 is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting PACAP-38 that was effective in preventing physiological responses of PACAP38 and reducing monthly migraine days in individuals with migraine. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the clinical utility, long-term safety and cost-effectiveness of therapies targeting the PACAP pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanfranco Pellesi
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Suzuki K, Suzuki S, Shiina T, Haruyama Y, Kobayashi S, Shioda M, Hirata K. Real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Japanese patients with migraine. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26568. [PMID: 38420497 PMCID: PMC10900787 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Real-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness in migraine patients in Asia with various comorbidities and multiple previous medication failures is still limited. Methods A 6-month single-center cohort study of 45 patients with episodic or chronic migraine (CM) treated with erenumab was conducted. In the cohort, 60.0% were switching from other calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs), and 66.7% had ≥4 prophylaxis failures. The change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline and percentages of responders after treatment were calculated. Weekly migraine days (WMDs) were obtained at baseline and at months 1, 2 and 3 and were compared between weeks 2 and 4. Results In total, 36%, 47%, and 63% of patients had a ≥30% response at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. The cumulative percentage of patients achieving a ≥30% response over 6 months was 85%. Early responders (average ≥ 30% response at 1-3 months) accounted for 37.8%, 55.6%, and 25.9% of the total, CGRP mAb-naïve, and CGRP mAb-switching groups, respectively. Late responders (average < 30% response at 1-3 months and average ≥ 30% response at 4-6 months) accounted for 46.4%, 37.5%, and 58.8% of nonearly responders in the total, CGRP mAb-naïve, and CGRP mAb-switching groups, respectively. Mild adverse reactions were observed in 5 patients (11.1%). Wearing-off, defined as an increase in the number of WMDs ≥2 between week 2 and week 4, was observed in 2.4-12.5% at months 1-3. Conclusion Erenumab was effective in migraine patients. At least 4-6 months may be preferable for efficacy evaluation in patients switching to erenumab from other CGRP mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Shiho Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | | | - Yasuo Haruyama
- Integrated Research Faculty for Advanced Medical Sciences, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Saro Kobayashi
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Mukuto Shioda
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirata
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suliman R, Santos V, Al Qaisi I, Aldaher B, Al Fardan A, Al Barrawy H, Bader Y, Supena JL, Alejandro K, Alsaadi T. Effectiveness of Switching CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Non-Responder Patients in the UAE: A Retrospective Study. Neurol Int 2024; 16:274-288. [PMID: 38392960 PMCID: PMC10893254 DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) have shown promising effectiveness in migraine management compared to other preventative treatment options. Many questions remain regarding switching between antibody classes as a treatment option in patients with migraine headaches. This preliminary retrospective real-world study explored the treatment response of patients who switched between CGRP mAb classes due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. A total of 53 patients with migraine headache switched between three of the CGRP mAbs types due to lack of efficacy of the original prescribed CGRP mAbs, specifically eptinezumab, erenumab, and galcanezumab. Fremanezumab was not included due to unavailability in the UAE. Galcanezumab and eptinezumab target the CGRP ligand (CGRP/L), while erenumab targets CGRP receptors (CGRP/R). The analysis of efficacy demonstrated that some improvements were seen in both class switch cohorts (CGRP/R to CGRP/L and CGRP/L to CGRP/R). The safety of switching between CGRP classes was well observed, as any adverse events presented before the class switch did not lead to the discontinuation of treatment following the later switch. The findings of this study suggest that switching between different classes of CGRP mAbs is a potentially safe and clinically viable practice that may have some applications for those experiencing side effects on their current CGRP mAb or those witnessing suboptimal response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Suliman
- American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates (B.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Taoufik Alsaadi
- American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates (B.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Suzuki S, Suzuki K, Shiina T, Kobayashi S, Shioda M, Hirata K. Switching from calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody monthly to fremanezumab quarterly based on the patient's preferred dosing schedule. J Neurol Sci 2023; 455:122786. [PMID: 37993359 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.122786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shiho Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Keisuke Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan.
| | | | - Saro Kobayashi
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Mukuto Shioda
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirata
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alsaadi T, Kayed DM, Al-Madani A, Hassan AM, Terruzzi A, Krieger D, Riachi N, Sarathchandran P, Al-Rukn S. Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Use of CGRP-Based Therapies for Migraine Prevention in the UAE. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1845-1865. [PMID: 37792218 PMCID: PMC10630270 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00550-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a common debilitating neurological disorder affecting a large proportion of the general population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37-amino acid neuropeptide, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and the development of therapies targeting the anti-CGRP pathway has revolutionized the field of migraine treatment. METHODS An expert task force of neurologists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) developed and critically assessed recommendations on the use of CGRP-based therapies in migraine treatment and management in the UAE, based on available published literature. A consensus was reached for each statement by means of an open-voting process, based on a predefined agreement level of at least 60%. RESULTS The consensus recommendations advocate the need for guidelines for the appropriate use of CGRP-based therapies by defining patient cohorts and appropriate monitoring of therapeutic response as well as standardizing the initiation, assessment, and cessation of treatment. The consensus recommendations were primarily formulated on the basis of international studies, because of the limited availability of regional and local data. As such, they may also act as guidelines for global healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS These are the first consensus recommendations for the UAE that address the use of CGRP-based therapies in the treatment and management of migraine, integrating both clinical evidence and medical expertise to enhance clinical judgment and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taoufik Alsaadi
- Department of Neurology, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
| | - Deeb M Kayed
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | | | | | | | - Derk Krieger
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic Parkview Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Naji Riachi
- Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Khalifa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ito Y, Mitsufuji T, Okada M, Fujita S, Yokoyama R, Kawasaki H, Yamamoto T. Early Effect of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine with Medication Overuse: A Single-center Retrospective Study. Intern Med 2023; 62:3455-3460. [PMID: 37062749 PMCID: PMC10749820 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1471-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-(receptor) monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been reported to reduce the frequency of medication overuse in patients with migraine. The present study investigated whether or not CGRP-mAb treatment shows early effectiveness for medication overuse headache (MOH) in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients with MOH who received preventive treatment with CGRP-mAb from June 2021 to October 2022. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition was used to diagnose MOH. This study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University. Patients were recruited from this specialized headache outpatient center. Results In total, 69 patients with migraine had newly introduced CGRP-mAb, and 34 patients had MOH (49.3%). The mean±standard deviation patient age was 44±15.5 years old. The study population included 24 women (70.6%). The types of CGRP-mAb used were galcanezumab in 16 patients (47.0%), fremanezumab in 10 (29.4%), and erenumab in 8 (23.5%). The mean disease duration was 19.6±13.1 years. The types of migraine diagnosis were chronic migraine in 28 patients (82.4%) and migraine with aura in 11 patients (32.4%). The mean number of headache days in the month before administration of CGRP-mAb was 22±7.7 days; 1 month after administration, the MHD was 16.9±9.1 days. The change in MHD was -5.7 days (22.7%), indicating significant improvement (p<0.05). Conclusion CGRP-mAb has been suggested as a preventive treatment for patients with MOH. Further investigation of the long-term efficacy of CGRP-mAb for MOH is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Ito
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | | | - Mariko Okada
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | - Shugo Fujita
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | - Ryu Yokoyama
- Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Caponnetto V, Russo A, Silvestro M, Tessitore A, De Icco R, Vaghi G, Sances G, Tassorelli C, Baraldi C, Castro FL, Guerzoni S, Prudenzano MP, Fallacara A, Gentile M, Ornello R, Onofri A, Burgalassi A, Chiarugi A, De Cesaris F, Granato A, Casalena A, De Tommaso M, Mampreso E, Merlo P, Coppola G, Battistini S, Rebecchi V, Rainero I, Sepe FN, Dalla Volta G, Sacco S, Geppetti P, Iannone LF. Long-Term Treatment Over 52 Weeks with Monthly Fremanezumab in Drug-Resistant Migraine: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study. CNS Drugs 2023; 37:1069-1080. [PMID: 37999868 PMCID: PMC10703741 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01050-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world studies on fremanezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention, are few and with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the long-term (up to 52 weeks) effectiveness and tolerability of fremanezumab in high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine. METHODS This s an independent, prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling outpatients in 17 Italian Headache Centers with high-frequency episodic migraine or chronic migraine and multiple preventive treatment failures. Patients were treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly. The primary outcomes included changes from baseline (1 month before treatment) in monthly headache days, response rates (reduction in monthly headache days from baseline), and persistence in medication overuse at months 3, 6, and 12 (all outcome timeframes refer to the stated month). Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline in acute medication intake and disability questionnaires scores at the same timepoints. A last observation carried forward analysis was also performed. RESULTS A total of 90 patients who received at least one dose of fremanezumab and with a potential 12-month follow-up were included. Among them, 15 (18.0%) patients discontinued treatment for the entire population, a reduction in monthly headache days compared with baseline was reported at month 3, with a significant median [interquartile range] reduction in monthly headache days (- 9.0 [11.5], p < 0.001). A statistically different reduction was also reported at month 6 compared with baseline (- 10.0 [12.0]; p < 0.001) and at 12 months of treatment (- 10.0 [14.0]; p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with medication overuse was significantly reduced compared with baseline from 68.7% (57/83) to 29.6% (24/81), 25.3% (19/75), and 14.7% (10/68) at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, respectively (p < 0.001). Acute medication use (days and total number) and disability scores were also significantly reduced (p < 0.001). A ≥ 50% response rate was achieved for 51.9, 67.9, and 76.5% of all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Last observation carried forward analyses confirmed these findings. Fremanezumab was well tolerated, with just one patient discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence for the real-world effectiveness of fremanezumab in treating both high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine, with meaningful and sustained improvements in multiple migraine-related variables. No new safety issue was identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Caponnetto
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Headache Centre, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Headache Centre, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tessitore
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Headache Centre, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gloria Vaghi
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Flavia Lo Castro
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Prudenzano
- Headache Center, Amaducci Neurological Clinic, Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Adriana Fallacara
- Headache Center, Amaducci Neurological Clinic, Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Martino Gentile
- Headache Center, Amaducci Neurological Clinic, Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Agnese Onofri
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Burgalassi
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Chiarugi
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cesaris
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Granato
- Clinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Headache Centre, School of Neurology, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste, ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Marina De Tommaso
- Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mampreso
- Headache Centre, Neurology-Euganea, Padua Health Unit, Padua, Italy
| | - Paola Merlo
- Neurological Unit, Headache Centre, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Coppola
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Stefania Battistini
- Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Headache Center, Siena University Hospital Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Innocenzo Rainero
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", Headache Center, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Federica Nicoletta Sepe
- Neurology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Giorgio Dalla Volta
- U.O. Neurologia, Headache Center Istituto Clinico "Città di Brescia", Gruppo San Donato Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Altamura C, Brunelli N, Marcosano M, Alesina A, Fofi L, Vernieri F. Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine: Clinical Utility, Patient Preferences and Selection - A Narrative Review. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2023; 19:959-971. [PMID: 38023625 PMCID: PMC10680459 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s263824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The new Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies have proven high efficacy and tolerability in episodic and chronic migraine. Eptinezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds CGRP with high affinity. Eptinezumab was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on February 21st, 2020, for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. It is administered intravenously over 30 minutes with a standard dose of 100 mg and has a T-max of 30 minutes-1 hour and a half-life of 27 days. These pharmacological properties allow for a very rapid onset of effect and a quarterly administration. It is the first time that a preventive treatment for migraine can be offered as an intravenous administration. As the range of therapeutic possibilities in migraine is expanding, the treatment process must include common decision-making, where physicians should explain in detail to patients the different characteristics of treatment options beyond efficacy and side effects. Patients can now express a preference on a range of opportunities: pharmacological versus non-pharmacological approaches, route of administration, frequency of administration, efficacy, rapidity, side effects, costs, the possibility of titration or dosing, and durability of effectiveness at suspension. Also, patient preferences can be influenced by age, country, migraine severity, and earlier experience with CGRP-targeted therapies. Besides, adherence may be influenced by several factors, including route and the schedule of administration. This narrative review describes a new perspective from the patient's point of view. Clinicians should ally with patients to select treatments that meet each patient's needs and thus apply a tailored approach, addressing not only headaches. In this way, physicians would care for the patients globally and stand out their preferences on different aspects of treatment. Besides, healthcare professionals shall be aware that patients' beliefs about therapies are subject to change with increasing experience with new therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Altamura
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Marilena Marcosano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Alesina
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Luisa Fofi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ihara K, Ohtani S, Watanabe N, Takahashi N, Miyazaki N, Takemura R, Hori S, Nakahara J, Takizawa T. Switching between anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A comparison of monthly and quarterly dosing. J Neurol Sci 2023; 453:120811. [PMID: 37757639 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) have dramatically changed preventive treatment options for patients with migraine. Although there is emerging real-world evidence on the use of CGRPmAbs globally, the change in efficacy and safety after switching between CGRPmAbs owing to patients' frequency of hospital visits preference remains unknown. METHODS We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, real-world study of patients with migraine who first received galcanezumab for 3 or 4 months and then switched to fremanezumab at Keio University Hospital. We investigated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), responder rate, and adverse effects such as injection site reactions. RESULTS MMD increased only by 0.7 (95% CI, -4.1-5.5; p = 0.748) after 4 months of treatment with fremanezumab (6.1, 95% CI, 2.3-9.9) compared to before switching (5.4, 95% CI, 2.2-8.6). Furthermore, switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab produced only minor adverse events, such as injection site reactions. CONCLUSIONS After switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab out of the desire to visit the hospital less often, the reduction in MMD compared to baseline was sustained, and no serious adverse effects were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Ihara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Seiya Ohtani
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan; Division of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Japan
| | - Narumi Watanabe
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | - Naoki Miyazaki
- Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Japan
| | - Ryo Takemura
- Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Japan
| | - Satoko Hori
- Division of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Japan
| | - Jin Nakahara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Juhasz G, Gecse K, Baksa D. Towards precision medicine in migraine: Recent therapeutic advances and potential biomarkers to understand heterogeneity and treatment response. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 250:108523. [PMID: 37657674 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
After 35 years since the introduction of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD), we are living in the era of the second great revolution in migraine therapies. First, discoveries of triptans provided a breakthrough in acute migraine treatment utilizing bench-to-bedside research results on the role of serotonin in migraine. Next, the discovery of the role of neuropeptides, more specifically calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine attack led to the development of anti-CGRP therapies that are effective both in acute and preventive treatment, and are also able to reduce migraine-related burden. Here, we reviewed the most recent clinical studies and real-world data on available migraine-specific medications, including triptans, ditants, gepants and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Novel drug targets, such as PACAP and amylins were also discussed. To address the main challenges of migraine therapy, the high heterogeneity of people with migraine, the prevalent presence of various comorbid disorders, and the insufficient medical care of migraine patients were covered. Promising novel approaches from the fields of omics, blood and saliva biomarker, imaging and provocation studies might bring solutions for these challenges with the potential to identify further drug targets, distinguish more homogeneous patient subgroups, contribute to more optimal drug selection strategies, and detect biomarkers in association with headache features or predicting treatment efficacy. In the future, the combined analysis of data of different biomarker modalities with machine learning algorithms may serve precision medicine in migraine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Juhasz
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Kinga Gecse
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Daniel Baksa
- Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; NAP3.0 Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Personality and Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Limberg N. Managing Migraine: Medication Overuse Headache and Treatment with Eptinezumab. Pain Ther 2023; 12:1283-1291. [PMID: 37347339 PMCID: PMC10444718 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00534-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) places both a physical and emotional burden on patients. MOH may occur as a consequence of a negative spiral of events comprising an increasing number of headache days while taking frequent or excessive amounts of medications for acute treatment of headaches or migraine. Despite acute and prophylactic treatment options, there remains a complex subset of patients who fail first-line oral prophylactic therapies due to insufficient response or failure to tolerate, and require access to new prophylactic treatment options, including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors such as eptinezumab. In this article I present a series of clinical scenarios in which the use of eptinezumab may be beneficial, based on the extensive experience I have gained using the treatment, in more than 25 patients, (and over 40 infusions), over a 2-year period. Eptinezumab provides an additional therapeutic modality for patients who are refractory to other migraine medications, including other CGRP pathway monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies. I discuss within this article the potential role for eptinezumab in various clinical scenarios such as refractory migraine, including MOH, in which the rapid bioavailability of the preparation may be of particular utility. It is important to tailor treatment plans to the individual patient needs and provide other lifestyle and non-drug-based recommendations when treating patients with MOH, who may be appropriate for treatment with eptinezumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Limberg
- Migraine Specialist Brisbane, St Andrew's Place, Suite 312, Level 2, 33 North Street, Spring Hill, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ornello R, Raffaelli B. Editorial: Spotlight on resistant and refractory migraine. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1291439. [PMID: 37830091 PMCID: PMC10565493 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1291439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Labastida-Ramírez A, Caronna E, Gollion C, Stanyer E, Dapkute A, Braniste D, Naghshineh H, Meksa L, Chkhitunidze N, Gudadze T, Pozo-Rosich P, Burstein R, Hoffmann J. Mode and site of action of therapies targeting CGRP signaling. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:125. [PMID: 37691118 PMCID: PMC10494408 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01644-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Targeting CGRP has proved to be efficacious, tolerable, and safe to treat migraine; however, many patients with migraine do not benefit from drugs that antagonize the CGRPergic system. Therefore, this review focuses on summarizing the general pharmacology of the different types of treatments currently available, which target directly or indirectly the CGRP receptor or its ligand. Moreover, the latest evidence regarding the selectivity and site of action of CGRP small molecule antagonists (gepants) and monoclonal antibodies is critically discussed. Finally, the reasons behind non-responders to anti-CGRP drugs and rationale for combining and/or switching between these therapies are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cédric Gollion
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Emily Stanyer
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Diana Braniste
- Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Diomid Gherman, Chișinău, Moldova
- State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Nicolae Testemițanu, Moldova
| | - Hoda Naghshineh
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Liga Meksa
- Headache Unit, Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Riga East University Hospital Gailezers, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Tamari Gudadze
- Department of Neurology, Christian Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rami Burstein
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Life Science, Room 649, 3 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jan Hoffmann
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lambru G, Caponnetto V, Hill B, Ratti S, Sacco S, Murphy M, Briscoe J, Andreou AP. Long-Term Effect of Switching From an Anti-CGRP Receptor to an Anti-CGRP Ligand Antibody in Treatment-Refractory Chronic Migraine: A Prospective Real-World Analysis. Neurotherapeutics 2023; 20:1284-1293. [PMID: 37430146 PMCID: PMC10480365 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01394-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In migraine patients with a poor response to a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody against the receptor, switching to a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies against the ligand may be beneficial. This was a long-term real-world prospective analysis conducted in treatment-refractory chronic migraine patients coming from two large tertiary referral headache centres, who did not achieve a meaningful response to erenumab and were switched to fremanezumab. Responders to fremanezumab were considered those who achieved at least 30% reduction in monthly migraine days by month 3, compared to the post-erenumab baseline. Secondary efficacy and disability outcomes were analysed. Thirty-nine patients (female n = 32, 82.1%; median age: 49 years old, IQR = 29.0-56.0) were included. After three months of treatment with fremanezumab, ten out of 39 patients (25.6%) were considered responders. Four of the 11 patients who continued fremanezumab became responders at month 6, increasing the number of responders to 14 patients (35.9%). Responders received a median of 12 injections (IQR = 9.0-18.0) at the time of the analysis. After the last treatment, 13 patients (33.3%) remained responders. The number of mean monthly migraine days significantly decreased from 21.4 at baseline (IQR = 10.7-30.0) to 8.6 (IQR = 3.8-13.9) at the last follow-up. Painkillers intake and HIT-6 score were significantly reduced at the last follow-up. About 1/3 of patients with treatment refractory chronic migraine who have a disappointing response to erenumab and switch to fremanezumab, obtained a meaningful and sustained improvement of their migraine load over time, supporting the appropriateness of this therapeutic approach in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Lambru
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom, London, UK.
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Bethany Hill
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susanna Ratti
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Madeleine Murphy
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jessica Briscoe
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anna P Andreou
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Headache Research‑Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schoenen J, Van Dycke A, Versijpt J, Paemeleire K. Ten open questions in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide pathway: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:99. [PMID: 37528353 PMCID: PMC10391994 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01637-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) pathway, collectively called here "anti-CGRP/rec mAbs", have dramatically improved preventive migraine treatment. Although their efficacy and tolerability were proven in a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and, maybe even more convincingly, in real world settings, a number of open questions remain. In this narrative review, we will analyze published data allowing insight in some of the uncertainties related to the use of anti-CGRP/rec mAbs in clinical practice: their differential efficacy in migraine subtypes, outcome predictors, switching between molecules, use in children and adolescents, long-term treatment adherence and persistence, effect persistence after discontinuation, combined treatment with botulinum toxin or gepants, added-value and cost effectiveness, effectiveness in other headache types, and potential contraindications based on known physiological effects of CGRP. While recent studies have already provided hints for some of these questions, many of them will not find reliable and definitive answers before larger studies, registries or dedicated RCTs are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology‑Citadelle Hospital, University of Liège, Boulevard du 12 ème de Ligne 1, Liège, 4000, Belgium.
| | - Annelies Van Dycke
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Sint-Jan Bruges, Ruddershove 10, Bruges, 8000, Belgium
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Al-Hassany L, Karsan N, Lampl C, Goadsby PJ, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Revisiting dose-finding of monoclonal antibodies in migraine. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:69. [PMID: 37296378 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01602-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a debilitating disorder, and while the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has led to efficacious and tolerable responses, a substantial number of patients are so-called "non-responders". We introduce reasons for this insufficient response, including insufficient blockade of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) or its receptor. We present a clinical case, i.e. a female migraine patient who mistakenly administered supratherapeutic (three-fold higher) doses of erenumab leading to more efficacious clinical responses without any side-effects. This example illustrates that the initial dosages might have been too low, resulting in a remaining undesired increased effect of CGRP. While a capsaicin forearm model has repeatedly been used to evaluate the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of mAbs, we provide directions to revisit or reconsider dose-finding and dose-ranging of these drugs. These directions include (i) refinement and application of a capsaicin forehead model (instead of a forearm model) to study trigeminovascular activity and improve dosing, and (ii) reconsideration of trial populations. Indeed, the dose-finding studies were mainly performed in relatively young and normal-weight males, while most phase III/IV trials are marked by a high female-to-male ratio, mainly consisting of overweight to obese females. Considering these aspects in future trials could optimize healthcare for a larger proportion of migraine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Al-Hassany
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nazia Karsan
- NIHR SLaM Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Koventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Linz, Austria
- Headache Medical Center Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR SLaM Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Messina R, Christensen RH, Cetta I, Ashina M, Filippi M. Imaging the brain and vascular reactions to headache treatments: a systematic review. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:58. [PMID: 37221469 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01590-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroimaging studies have made an important contribution to our understanding of headache pathophysiology. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview and critical appraisal of mechanisms of actions of headache treatments and potential biomarkers of treatment response disclosed by imaging studies. MAIN BODY We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases for imaging studies investigating central and vascular effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used to abort and prevent headache attacks. Sixty-three studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. Of these, 54 investigated migraine patients, 4 cluster headache patients and 5 patients with medication overuse headache. Most studies used functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 33) or molecular imaging (n = 14). Eleven studies employed structural MRI and a few used arterial spin labeling (n = 3), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (n = 3) or magnetic resonance angiography (n = 2). Different imaging modalities were combined in eight studies. Despite of the variety of imaging approaches and results, some findings were consistent. This systematic review suggests that triptans may cross the blood-brain barrier to some extent, though perhaps not sufficiently to alter the intracranial cerebral blood flow. Acupuncture in migraine, neuromodulation in migraine and cluster headache patients, and medication withdrawal in patients with medication overuse headache could promote headache improvement by reverting headache-affected pain processing brain areas. Yet, there is currently no clear evidence for where each treatment acts, and no firm imaging predictors of efficacy. This is mainly due to a scarcity of studies and heterogeneous treatment schemes, study designs, subjects, and imaging techniques. In addition, most studies used small sample sizes and inadequate statistical approaches, which precludes generalizable conclusions. CONCLUSION Several aspects of headache treatments remain to be elucidated using imaging approaches, such as how pharmacological preventive therapies work, whether treatment-related brain changes may influence therapy effectiveness, and imaging biomarkers of clinical response. In the future, well-designed studies with homogeneous study populations, adequate sample sizes and statistical approaches are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Messina
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - R H Christensen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - I Cetta
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - M Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - M Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Straube A, Broessner G, Gaul C, Hamann X, Hipp J, Kraya T, Neeb L. Real-world effectiveness of fremanezumab in patients with migraine switching from another mAb targeting the CGRP pathway: a subgroup analysis of the Finesse Study. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:59. [PMID: 37221478 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01593-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are effective and safe for prophylactic treatment of episodic (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). In case of treatment failure of a CGRP pathway targeting mAb, physician has to decide whether using another anti-CGRP pathway mAb is useful. This interim analysis of Finesse Study evaluates effectiveness of the anti-CGRP mAb fremanezumab in patients with a history of other prior anti-CGRP pathway mAb treatments (switch patients). METHODS FINESSE, a non-interventional, prospective, multicentre, two-country (Germany-Austria) study observing migraine patients receiving fremanezumab in clinical routine. This subgroup analysis presents data on documented effectiveness over 3 months after the first dose of fremanezumab in switch patients. Effectiveness was evaluated based on reduction in average number of migraine days per month (MMDs), MIDAS and HIT-6 scores changes as well as in number of monthly days with acute migraine medication use. RESULTS One hundred fifty-three out of 867 patients with a history of anti-CGRP pathway mAb treatment prior to initiation of fremanezumab were analysed. Switch to fremanezumab led to ≥ 50% MMD reduction in 42.8% of migraine patients, with higher response rate in EM (48.0%) than in CM patients (36.5%). A ≥ 30% MMD reduction was achieved by 58.7% in CM patients. After three months, monthly number of migraine days decreased by 6.4 ± 5.87 (baseline: 13.6 ± 6.5; p < 0.0001) in all patients, 5.2 ± 4.04 in EM and 7.7 ± 7.45 in CM patients. MIDAS scores decreased from 73.3 ± 56.8 (baseline) to 50.3 ± 52.9 (after 3 months; p = 0.0014), HIT-6 scores decreased from 65.9 ± 5.0 to 60.9 ± 7.2 (p < 0.0001). Concomitant use of acute migraine medication had decreased from 9.7 ± 4.98 (baseline) to 4.9 ± 3.66 (3 months) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our results show that about 42.8% of anti-CGRP pathway mAb-non-responder benefit from switching to fremanezumab. These results suggest that switching to fremanezumab may be a promising option for patients experiencing poor tolerability or inadequate efficacy with prior other anti-CGRP pathway mAb use. TRIAL REGISTRATION FINESSE Study is registered on the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (EUPAS44606).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Straube
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Gregor Broessner
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Charly Gaul
- Headache Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Torsten Kraya
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Sankt Georg Leipzig gGmbH, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center Halle, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Lars Neeb
- Helios Global Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Argyriou AA, Dermitzakis EV, Xiromerisiou G, Rallis D, Soldatos P, Litsardopoulos P, Vikelis M. Predictors of Response to Fremanezumab in Migraine Patients with at Least Three Previous Preventive Failures: Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Greek Registry. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093218. [PMID: 37176658 PMCID: PMC10179256 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define, in a real-world population of patients with high-frequency episodic (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM), the predictive role of socio-demographic or phenotypic profiling of responders to fremanezumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two-hundred and four adult fremanezumab-treated patients with either HFEM or CM, who failed to at least three preventive treatments, provided data at baseline on several individual socio-demographic and phenotypic variables. These variables were analyzed for their ability to independently predict the response (50-74% response rates) or super-response (≥ 75% response rates) to fremanezumab. Patients were followed from 3-18 months of fremanezumab exposure. RESULTS The main finding to emerge from univariate analyses was that three baseline socio-demographic/clinical variables, i.e., age group 41-70 years (p = 0.02); female gender (p = 0.03); patients with HFEM (p = 0.001), and three clinical phenotypic variables, i.e., strict unilateral pain (p = 0.05); pain in the ophthalmic trigeminal branch (p = 0.04); and the "imploding" quality of pain (p = 0.05), were significantly related to fremanezumab response. However, in multivariate analysis, only HFEM (p = 0.02), the presence of strict unilateral (p = 0.03), and pain location in the ophthalmic trigeminal branch (p = 0.036) were independently associated with good fremanezumab response. Allodynia (p = 0.04) was the only clinical predictive variable of super-responsiveness to fremanezumab. CONCLUSIONS A precise phenotypic profiling with identification of pain characteristics consistent with peripheral and/or central sensitization might reliably predict the responsiveness to fremanezumab in migraine prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas A Argyriou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Neurology Department, Agios Andreas State General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece
| | | | - Georgia Xiromerisiou
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41221 Larissa, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Rallis
- Department of Neurology, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, 18536 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Pantelis Litsardopoulos
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Neurology Department, Agios Andreas State General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece
| | - Michail Vikelis
- Headache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16673 Glyfada, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kaltseis K, Filippi V, Frank F, Eckhardt C, Schiefecker A, Broessner G. Monoclonal antibodies against CGRP (R): non-responders and switchers: real world data from an austrian case series. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:174. [PMID: 37118682 PMCID: PMC10142255 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03203-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assessement of the responder and non-responder rate to consecutive monoclonal CGRP-antibody (CGRP-mAb) treatment, the presence of side effects, analysis of predictors of response and loss-of-effectiveness evaluation over time. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis including 171 patients with episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), who received one, two or three different CGRP-mAbs. Non-response was defined as ≤ 50% reduction of monthly migraine days (MMDs) in EM and ≤ 30% reduction of MMDs in CM after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS 123 (71.9%) responded to the first mAb. Side effects led to treatment discontinuation in 9 (5.3%) patients. Of the 26 patients who did not respond to the first mAb or experienced a loss of efficacy over time, 11 (42.3%) responded to the second and two (28.6%) of 7 to the third monoclonal antibody. Poor response to therapy was associated with a higher monthly migraine frequency (p = 0.028), a higher number of prior preventive migraine therapies (p = 0.011) and medication overuse (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION Our findings support mAb-class switch in non-responders or in patients experiencing a loss of effectiveness. The use of a third CGRP-mAb could be beneficial for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kaltseis
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Vera Filippi
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Florian Frank
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christine Eckhardt
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alois Schiefecker
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gregor Broessner
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Iannone LF, Burgalassi A, Vigani G, Tabasso G, De Cesaris F, Chiarugi A, Geppetti P. Switching anti-CGRP(R) monoclonal antibodies in multi-assessed non-responder patients and implications for ineffectiveness criteria: A retrospective cohort study. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231160519. [PMID: 36918752 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231160519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A pharmacological class effect was initially proposed for monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway. However, preliminary evidence shows that switching patients who were non-responding to one monoclonal antibody to another could provide some benefit. Herein, we assess treatment response to an anti-calcitonin gene related peptide/receptor monoclonal antibody in patients who have failed to respond to anti-calcitonin gene related peptide/ligand monoclonal antibodies calcitonin gene related peptide/ligand monoclonal antibodies and vice versa. In addition, we select non-responders to the first anti- monoclonal antibody by three or five more stringent variables. METHODS Retrospective cohort study including outpatients treated consecutively with two anti-calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies. Ineffectiveness to the first monoclonal antibody was assessed using three (MIDAS score, monthly headache days, and analgesic monthly days) variables or five (monthly headache days, MIDAS score, analgesic monthly days, analgesic monthly number and HIT-6 score) variables in the same cohort of patients. The primary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in monthly headache days, response rate, and persistence in medication overuse at three months of treatment with the second anti-CGRP mAb. RESULTS In patients selected by three variables, a sustained reduction in monthly headache days, analgesic monthly days, MIDAS and HIT-6 scores was observed at month-3 of treatment with the second monoclonal antibody. Ten (45.4%) patients achieved at least a ≥30% response rate. No difference was reported switching anti-CGRP mAb against ligand or receptor. In the patient subgroup selected by five variables, only HIT-6 was reduced from baseline at month-3. However, a trend toward a reduction in monthly headache days, analgesic monthly days, and MIDAS score was observed at month-3. CONCLUSIONS Switching anti-calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies in selected patients might be an option to achieve or improve clinical benefit. More studies are required to establish the effectiveness of switching these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Burgalassi
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Vigani
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Tabasso
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cesaris
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Chiarugi
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fresán-Restituto D, Lacalle-Fabo E, Martín-Bujanda M, Sarobe-Carricas MT. Non-responder migraine patients to a first anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody benefit from a switch to a second one. Rev Neurol 2023; 76:213-216. [PMID: 36908035 PMCID: PMC10364061 DOI: 10.33588/rn.7606.2022350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
|
32
|
Schiano di Cola F, Bolchini M, Ceccardi G, Caratozzolo S, Liberini P, Rao R, Padovani A. An observational study on monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin-gene-related peptide and its receptor. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:1764-1773. [PMID: 36856538 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Based on their pharmacological target, two classes of calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been identified: antibodies against the CGRP ligand-galcanezumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab-and antibodies against the CGRP receptor (CGRP-R), erenumab. The aim of the present study was to compare anti-CGRP versus anti-CGRP-R mAbs in patients with high frequency episodic and chronic migraine. METHODS All patients on monthly treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs with an available 6 months' follow-up at January 2022 were included. Data on efficacy outcome were collected following one (T1), three (T3) and six (T6) months of treatment, and included monthly headache/migraine days, the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) and Headache Impact Test 6 (HIT-6) scores, pain intensity, analgesics consumption and response rates (>50% headache days reduction compared to baseline). RESULTS In all, 152 patients were enrolled, of whom 68 were in treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs (49 galcanezumab, 19 fremanezumab) and 84 with the anti-CGRP-R (erenumab). MIDAS scores were significantly lower in the anti-CGRP group at T1 and T3 (respectively p < 0.02 and p < 0.03) as well as the number of mean migraine days at T3 (p < 0.01). At T3 and T6 outcome measures were comparable, although a significantly higher percentage of super-responders was found in the anti-CGRP group (respectively p < 0.04 and p < 0.05), with a similar overall percentage of responders. CONCLUSIONS The present study on a real-world sample confirms the beneficial effect of both anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP-R mAbs, with a more favorable outcome for anti-CGRP antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Schiano di Cola
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Bolchini
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giulia Ceccardi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Caratozzolo
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Liberini
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Renata Rao
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Raffaelli B, Fitzek M, Overeem LH, Storch E, Terhart M, Reuter U. Clinical evaluation of super-responders vs. non-responders to CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies: a real-world experience. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:16. [PMID: 36843007 PMCID: PMC9969617 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01552-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials and real-world studies revealed a spectrum of response to CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in migraine prophylaxis, ranging from no effect at all to total migraine freedom. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical characteristics between super-responders (SR) and non-responders (NR) to CGRP(-receptor) mAbs. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study at the Headache Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. The definition of super-response was a ≥ 75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) in the third month after treatment initiation compared to the month prior to treatment begin (baseline). Non-response was defined as ≤ 25% reduction in MHD after three months of treatment with a CGRP-receptor mAb and subsequent three months of treatment with CGRP mAb, or vice versa. We collected demographic data, migraine disease characteristics, migraine symptoms during the attacks in both study groups (SR/NR) as well as the general medical history. SR and NR were compared using Chi-square test for categorical variables, and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS Between November 2018 and June 2022, n = 260 patients with migraine received preventive treatment with CGRP(-receptor) mAbs and provided complete headache documentation for the baseline phase and the third treatment month. Among those, we identified n = 29 SR (11%) and n = 26 NR (10%). SR reported more often especially vomiting (SR n = 12/25, 48% vs. NR n = 4/22, 18%; p = 0.031) and typical migraine characteristics such as unilateral localization, pulsating character, photophobia and nausea. A subjective good response to triptans was significantly higher in SR (n = 26/29, 90%) than in NR (n = 15/25, 60%, p = 0.010). NR suffered more frequently from chronic migraine (NR n = 24/26, 92% vs. SR n = 15/29, 52%; p = 0.001), medication overuse headache (NR n = 14/24, 58% versus SR n = 8/29, 28%; p = 0.024), and concomitant depression (NR n = 17/26, 65% vs. SR n = 8/29, 28%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Several clinical parameters differ between SR and NR to prophylactic CGRP(-R) mAbs. A thorough clinical evaluation prior to treatment initiation might help to achieve a more personalized management in patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Raffaelli
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany ,grid.484013.a0000 0004 6879 971XClinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Mira Fitzek
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Lucas H. Overeem
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Elisabeth Storch
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Maria Terhart
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany. .,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Giffin NJ. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies for migraine. Pract Neurol 2023; 23:200-207. [PMID: 36754606 DOI: 10.1136/pn-2022-003592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies represents a step forward in preventive migraine treatment as the first agents to target the underlying pathogenesis of migraine. In trials they act more quickly, have better long-term adherence and appear to be better tolerated than other treatments. Major disadvantages are their high cost and unknown safety in pregnancy and in cardiovascular disease. To mitigate these concerns, they should be used according to guidance produced by professional bodies, with defined starting and stopping criteria. We do not yet know whether they are more effective than standard care; many patients may still be better treated by other means, in particular addressing lifestyle factors and medication-overuse headache.
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee MJ, Al-Karagholi MAM, Reuter U. New migraine prophylactic drugs: Current evidence and practical suggestions for non-responders to prior therapy. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024221146315. [PMID: 36759320 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221146315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs) and small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) are new mechanism-based prophylactic drugs developed to address the unmet needs of pre-existing migraine prophylactic medications. However, several uncertainties remain in their real-world applications. METHODS This is a narrative review of the literature on the use of CGRP-targeting novel therapeutics in specific situations, including non-responders to prior therapy, combination therapy, switching, and treatment termination. In the case of lack of available literature, we made suggestions based on clinical reasoning. RESULTS High-quality evidence supports the use of all available anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab) in non-responders to prior therapy. There is insufficient evidence to support or reject the efficacy of combining CGRP(-R) mAbs or gepants with oral migraine prophylactic agents or botulinum toxin A. Switching from one CGRP(-R) mAb to another might benefit a fraction of patients. Currently, treatment termination depends on reimbursement policies, and the optimal mode of termination is discussed. CONCLUSIONS New prophylactic drugs that target the CGRP pathway are promising treatment options for patients with difficult-to-treat migraine. Individualized approaches using a combination of new substances with oral prophylactic drugs or botulinum toxin A, switching between new drugs, and adjusting treatment duration could enhance excellence in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mohammad Al-Mahdi Al-Karagholi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Greifswald, Germany.,Board of Directors, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Overeem LH, Lange KS, Fitzek MP, Siebert A, Steinicke M, Triller P, Hong JB, Reuter U, Raffaelli B. Effect of switching to erenumab in non-responders to a CGRP ligand antibody treatment in migraine: A real-world cohort study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1154420. [PMID: 37034092 PMCID: PMC10075077 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1154420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Therapeutic options for migraine prevention in non-responders to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and its receptor are often limited. Real-world data have shown that non-responders to the CGRP-receptor mAb erenumab may benefit from switching to a CGRP ligand mAb. However, it remains unclear whether, vice versa, erenumab is effective in non-responders to CGRP ligand mAbs. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy of erenumab in patients who have previously failed a CGRP ligand mAb. Methods This monocentric retrospective cohort study included patients with episodic or chronic migraine in whom a non-response (< 30% reduction of monthly headache days during month 3 of treatment compared to baseline) to the CGRP ligand mAbs galcanezumab or fremanezumab led to a switch to erenumab, and who had received at least 3 administrations of erenumab. Monthly headache days were retrieved from headache diaries to assess the ≥30% responder rates and the absolute reduction of monthly headache days at 3 and 6 months of treatment with erenumab in this cohort. Results From May 2019 to July 2022, we identified 20 patients who completed 3 months of treatment with erenumab after non-response to a CGRP ligand mAb. Fourteen patients continued treatment for ≥6 months. The ≥30% responder rate was 35% at 3 months, and 45% at 6 months of treatment with erenumab, respectively. Monthly headache days were reduced from 18.6 ± 5.9 during baseline by 4.1 ± 3.1 days during month 3, and by 7.0 ± 4.8 days during month 6 compared to the month before treatment with erenumab (p < 0.001, respectively). Responders and non-responders to erenumab did not differ with respect to demographic or headache characteristics. Conclusion Switching to erenumab in non-responders to a CGRP ligand mAb might be beneficial in a subgroup of resistant patients, with increasing responder rates after 6 months of treatment. Larger prospective studies should aim to predict which subgroup of patients benefit from a switch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Hendrik Overeem
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Doctoral Program, International Graduate Program Medical Neurosciences, Humboldt Graduate School, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Lucas Hendrik Overeem
| | | | - Mira Pauline Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Siebert
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maureen Steinicke
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Triller
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ja Bin Hong
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie. DGNEUROLOGIE 2023; 6. [PMCID: PMC9951165 DOI: 10.1007/s42451-023-00546-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
|
38
|
[Consensus statement of the migraine and headache societies (DMKG, ÖKSG, and SKG) on the duration of pharmacological migraine prophylaxis]. Schmerz 2023; 37:5-16. [PMID: 36287263 PMCID: PMC9607711 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-022-00671-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is the most common neurological disorder and can be associated with a high degree of disability. In addition to non-pharmacological approaches to reduce migraine frequency, pharmacological migraine preventatives are available. Evidence-based guidelines from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG), and German Society for Neurology (DGN), Austrian Headache Society (ÖKSG), and Swiss Headache Society (SKG) are available for indication and application. For therapy-relevant questions such as the duration of a pharmacological migraine prevention, no conclusions can be drawn from currently available study data. The aim of this review is to present a therapy consensus statement that integrates the current data situation and, where data are lacking, expert opinions. The resulting current recommendations on the duration of therapy for pharmacological migraine prophylaxis are shown here.
Collapse
|
39
|
Pavelic AR, Wöber C, Riederer F, Zebenholzer K. Monoclonal Antibodies against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide for Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review of Real-World Data. Cells 2022; 12:cells12010143. [PMID: 36611935 PMCID: PMC9819019 DOI: 10.3390/cells12010143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of real-world outcomes for anti-CGRP-mAbs. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed for real-world data of erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, or eptinezumab in patients with migraines. RESULTS We identified 134 publications (89 retrospective), comprising 10 pharmaco-epidemiologic and 83 clinic-based studies, 38 case reports, and 3 other articles. None of the clinic-based studies provided follow-up data over more than one year in more than 200 patients. Findings suggest that there are reductions in health insurance claims and days with sick-leave as well as better treatment adherence with anti-CGRP-mAbs. Effectiveness, reported in 77 clinic-based studies, was comparable to randomized controlled trials. A treatment pause was associated with an increase in migraine frequency, and switching to another antibody resulted in a better response in some of the patients. Adverse events and safety issues were addressed in 86 papers, including 24 single case reports. CONCLUSION Real-world data on anti-CGRP-mAbs are limited by retrospective data collection, small patient numbers, and short follow-up periods. The majority of papers seem to support good effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP-mAbs in the real-world setting. There is an unmet need for large prospective real-world studies providing long-term follow-ups of patients treated with anti-CGRP-mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antun R. Pavelic
- Department of Neurology, Hietzing Hospital, 1130 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Wöber
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences & Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Correspondence:
| | - Franz Riederer
- Department of Neurology, Hietzing Hospital, 1130 Vienna, Austria
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karin Zebenholzer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences & Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Goßrau G, Förderreuther S, Ruscheweyh R, Ruschil V, Sprenger T, Lewis D, Kamm K, Freilinger T, Neeb L, Malzacher V, Meier U, Gehring K, Kraya T, Dresler T, Schankin CJ, Gantenbein AR, Brössner G, Zebenholzer K, Diener HC, Gaul C, Jürgens TP. [Consensus statement of the migraine and headache societies (DMKG, ÖKSG, and SKG) on the duration of pharmacological migraine prophylaxis]. DER NERVENARZT 2022; 94:306-317. [PMID: 36287216 PMCID: PMC9607745 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01403-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is the most common neurological disorder and can be associated with a high degree of disability. In addition to non-pharmacological approaches to reduce migraine frequency, pharmacological migraine preventatives are available. Evidence-based guidelines from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG), and German Society for Neurology (DGN), Austrian Headache Society (ÖKSG), and Swiss Headache Society (SKG) are available for indication and application. For therapy-relevant questions such as the duration of a pharmacological migraine prevention, no conclusions can be drawn from currently available study data. The aim of this review is to present a therapy consensus statement that integrates the current data situation and, where data are lacking, expert opinions. The resulting current recommendations on the duration of therapy for pharmacological migraine prophylaxis are shown here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gudrun Goßrau
- Kopfschmerzambulanz, Universitätsschmerzcentrum, Medizinische Fakultät der TU Dresden, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Stefanie Förderreuther
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland ,Deutsche Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft, Frankfurt, Deutschland ,Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Victoria Ruschil
- Abteilung Neurologie mit Schwerpunkt Epileptologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Till Sprenger
- Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Deutschland
| | | | - Katharina Kamm
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | | | - Lars Neeb
- Helios Global Health, Berlin, Deutschland ,Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Institut für Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Uwe Meier
- Berufsverband Deutscher Neurologen, Wulffstr. 8, 12165 Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Gehring
- Berufsverband Deutscher Nervenärzte, Wulffstr. 8, 12165 Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Torsten Kraya
- Neurologische Klinik, Krankenhaus Sankt Georg Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland ,Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Halle-Saale, Halle-Saale, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Dresler
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Tübingen Zentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland ,LEAD Graduiertenschule & Forschungsnetzwerk, Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Christoph J. Schankin
- Neurologische Klinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz ,Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz
| | - Andreas R. Gantenbein
- Neurologie & Schmerz, ZURZACH Care, Bad Zurzach, Schweiz ,Praxis Neurologie am Untertor, Bülach, Schweiz
| | - Gregor Brössner
- Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich
| | - Karin Zebenholzer
- Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IMIBE), Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Charly Gaul
- Kopfschmerzzentrum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Tim P. Jürgens
- Kopfschmerzzentrum Nordost, Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinik Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland ,Neurologische Klinik, KMG Krankenhaus Güstrow, Güstrow, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fitzek M, Raffaelli B, Reuter U. Advances in pharmacotherapy for the prophylactic treatment of resistant and refractory migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1143-1153. [PMID: 35698795 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2088281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Refractory migraine is associated with low quality of life and great socioeconomic burden. Despite high need for effective, tolerable preventive therapies, there has been little research on potential therapeutic options. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) are the first preventive therapeutic approach for migraine based on the underlying pathophysiology. AREAS COVERED Following a brief introduction into the term 'refractory migraine,' the authors reviewavailable treatment options, focusing on current phase III trials of substances acting on the CGRP pathway. EXPERT OPINION No uniform definition for refractory migraine is available. The vast majority of proposals recommend treatment failure of 2-4 drug classes as a key diagnostic criterion. Phase III studies on CGRP-(receptor) mAbs demonstrated excellent efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic and episodic migraine including subjects with multiple unsuccessful conventional therapy attempts. However, more comparator trials showing superiority of mAbs versus oral preventatives, such as the HER-MEs study are needed. In summary, with the CGRP antibodies, a group of drugs has entered the market which will most likely not only significantly improve the quality of life of many individual migraine patients but could also reduce indirect health-care costs associated with migraine by reducing recurrent medical consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Clinician Scientist Programm, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Martelletti P, Mitsikostas DD, Ornello R, Reuter U, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt G, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Lampl C. European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:67. [PMID: 35690723 PMCID: PMC9188162 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A previous European Headache Federation (EHF) guideline addressed the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway to prevent migraine. Since then, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence have expanded the evidence and knowledge for those treatments. Therefore, the EHF panel decided to provide an updated guideline on the use of those treatments. Methods The guideline was developed following the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The working group identified relevant questions, performed a systematic review and an analysis of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Where the GRADE approach was not applicable, expert opinion was provided. Results We found moderate to high quality of evidence to recommend eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in individuals with episodic and chronic migraine. For several important clinical questions, we found not enough evidence to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance relied on experts’ opinion. Nevertheless, we provided updated suggestions regarding the long-term management of those treatments and their place with respect to the other migraine preventatives. Conclusion Monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are recommended for migraine prevention as they are effective and safe also in the long-term. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences - University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neurorehabilitation/Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina I Deligianni
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Christian Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany.,University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Dimos-Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences - University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Gisela Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Uluduz
- Department of Neurology Istanbul Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair, Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology, Headache Medical Center at the Konventhospital BHB Linz, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Basedau H, Sturm LM, Mehnert J, Peng KP, Schellong M, May A. Migraine monoclonal antibodies against CGRP change brain activity depending on ligand or receptor target - an fMRI study. eLife 2022; 11:77146. [PMID: 35604755 PMCID: PMC9126581 DOI: 10.7554/elife.77146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against calcitonin gene-related peptides (CGRP) are novel treatments for migraine prevention. Based on a previous functional imaging study which investigated the CGRP receptor mAb (erenumab), we hypothesized that (i) the CGRP ligand mAb galcanezumab would alter central trigeminal pain processing; (ii) responders to galcanezumab treatment would show specific hypothalamic modulation in contrast to non-responders; and (iii) the ligand and the receptor antibody differ in brain responses. Methods: Using an established trigeminal nociceptive functional magnetic imaging paradigm, 26 migraine patients were subsequently scanned twice: before and 2–3 weeks after administration of galcanezumab. Results: We found that galcanezumab decreases hypothalamic activation in all patients and that the reduction was stronger in responders than in non-responders. Contrasting erenumab and galcanezumab showed that both antibodies activate a distinct network. We also found that pre-treatment activity of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN) and coupling between the STN and the hypothalamus covariates with the response to galcanezumab. Conclusions: These data suggest that despite relative impermeability of the blood-brain barrier for CGRP mAb, mAb treatment induces certain and highly specific brain effects which may be part of the mechanism of their efficacy in migraine treatment. Funding: This work was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of ERA-Net Neuron under the project code BIOMIGA (01EW2002 to AM) and by the German Research Foundation (SFB936-178316478-A5 to AM). The funding sources did not influence study conduction in any way. Clinical trial number: The basic science study was preregistered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/m2rc6).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hauke Basedau
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa-Marie Sturm
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Mehnert
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kuan-Po Peng
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlene Schellong
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arne May
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Driessen MT, Cohen JM, Thompson SF, Patterson-Lomba O, Seminerio MJ, Carr K, Totev TI, Sun R, Yim E, Mu F, Ayyagari R. Real-world effectiveness after initiating fremanezumab treatment in US patients with episodic and chronic migraine or difficult-to-treat migraine. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:56. [PMID: 35578182 PMCID: PMC9109352 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01415-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb; IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. The efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prevention have been demonstrated in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Real-world effectiveness data are needed to complement clinical trial data. This study assessed the effectiveness of fremanezumab across different subgroups of adult patients with episodic migraine (EM), chronic migraine (CM), or difficult-to-treat (DTT) migraine in real-world clinical settings. Methods This retrospective, panel-based online chart review used electronic case report forms. Patient inclusion criteria were a physician diagnosis of EM or CM; age ≥ 18 years at the time of first fremanezumab initiation; ≥ 1 dose of fremanezumab treatment; ≥ 1 follow-up visit since first initiation; and ≥ 2 measurements of monthly migraine days (MMD; with 1 within a month before or at first initiation and ≥ 1 after first initiation). Changes in MMD and monthly headache days were assessed during the follow-up period. These endpoints were evaluated in subgroups of patients by migraine type (EM/CM) and in subgroups with DTT migraine (diagnosis of medication overuse [MO], major depressive disorder [MDD], generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], or prior exposure to a different CGRP pathway–targeted mAb [CGRP mAb]). Results Data were collected from 421 clinicians and 1003 patients. Mean (percent) reductions from baseline in MMD at Month 6 were − 7.7 (77.0%) in EM patients, − 10.1 (68.7%) in CM patients, − 10.8 (80.6%) in the MO subgroup, − 9.9 (68.3%) in the MDD subgroup, − 9.5 (66.4%) in the GAD subgroup, and − 9.0 (68.7%) in the prior CGRP mAb exposure subgroup. Improvements in MDD or GAD severity were reported by 45.5% and 45.8% of patients with comorbid MDD or GAD, respectively. Conclusions In this real-world study, fremanezumab demonstrated effectiveness for migraine regardless of migraine type or the presence of factors contributing to DTT migraine (MO, GAD, MDD, or prior exposure to a different CGRP mAb). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01415-x.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cohen F, Yuan H, Silberstein SD. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies and Antagonists in Migraine: Current Evidence and Rationale. BioDrugs 2022; 36:341-358. [PMID: 35476215 PMCID: PMC9043885 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00530-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37 amino-acid neuropeptide found mostly in peptidergic sensory C-fibers, has been suggested to be implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine, which is one of the most common neurological disorders seen in medical practice, affecting almost 16% of the US population. While previously thought to be a vascular condition, migraine attacks are the result of neurogenic inflammation and peripheral/central sensitization through dysfunctional activation of the trigeminovascular system. To date, two classes of therapeutic agents have been developed to interrupt the function of CGRP: CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule antagonists (gepants). There are currently four CGRP-targeted mAbs and three gepants that are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of migraine. Multiple phase II and III studies have established the efficacies and tolerability of these treatments. Previously, we reviewed the fundamental role of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Here, we discuss in depth the clinical evidence (randomized controlled trials and real-world studies), safety, and tolerability of CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants for treating migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
De Matteis E, Sacco S, Ornello R. Migraine Prevention with Erenumab: Focus on Patient Selection, Perspectives and Outcomes. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2022; 18:359-378. [PMID: 35411146 PMCID: PMC8994624 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s263825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor suitable for episodic and chronic migraine prevention. Randomized clinical trials proved the superiority of erenumab to placebo in a strictly selected population, while real-world studies confirmed treatment efficacy in more severe forms of disease – most patients suffered from chronic migraine with medication overuse headache, had prior treatment failures, and long disease duration. According to guidelines, anti-CGRP pathway monoclonal antibodies should be reserved to patients who failed or have contraindication to several classes of preventive treatments. However, their ease of use, tolerability and efficacy make these monoclonal antibodies ideally suitable for most patients with migraine; cost-effectiveness needs to be considered when looking at expanding current prescription criteria. Also, data from open label extensions of randomized control trials confirmed sustained benefits of prolonged treatment up to 5 consecutive years without significant risk of adverse events. Further studies will provide insights on optimal treatment duration to achieve migraine remission and predictors of treatment response. In the present work, we aimed at reviewing design and results of the main studies on erenumab and discussing treatment use in the current migraine prevention scenario; we also summarized the main ongoing research projects and provided clinical perspectives for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora De Matteis
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
- Correspondence: Simona Sacco, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, L’Aquila, 67100, Italy, Tel +39 0862433561; +39 0863499734, Email
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cohen F, Yuan H, DePoy EMG, Silberstein SD. The Arrival of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:922-930. [PMID: 35426060 PMCID: PMC9294119 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01230-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Remarkable advancements have been made in the field of migraine pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy over the past decade. Understanding the molecular mechanism of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has led to the discovery of a novel class of drugs, CGRP functional blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), for migraine prevention. CGRP is a neuropeptide inherently involved in migraine physiology where its receptors are found dispersed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. CGRP-targeted mAbs are effective in the preventive treatment of both chronic and episodic migraine. The advantages of mAbs over oral migraine preventives are numerous. Favorable attributes of the mAbs include high affinity and selectivity for CGRP molecular targets, long-circulating plasma half-lives, and limited risk for nonspecific hepatic and renal toxicity. This pharmacological profile leads to fewer off-target (side) effects and drug-drug interactions rendering mAbs an attractive alternative to traditional small molecule therapies, especially for the preventive treatment of migraine. MAbs display minimal drug interaction thus are excellent for patients prescribed with multiple medications. However, the long-term safety of CGRP blockade is incompletely known, and CGRP mAbs use should be avoided during pregnancy. CGRP mAbs represent a radical shift in preventing chronic and episodic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - E M G DePoy
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hamann T, Rimmele F, Jürgens TP. [CGRP antibodies in migraine prophylaxis : The new standard in migraine treatment?]. Schmerz 2022; 36:59-72. [PMID: 35041064 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-021-00613-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is associated with a high individual level of suffering. Therefore, an effective preventive treatment is highly important. The spectrum of classical prophylactic drugs has now been expanded to include monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor. These antibodies have shown reliable efficacy compared to placebo and a rapid onset of action with a low rate of side effects and negligible interactions in pivotal studies. Recently, the efficacy of the antibody was shown in many studies even on drug-refractory migraine and migraine associated with medication overuse. Comprehensive head to head comparisons with previously established drugs and among the antibodies are not yet available; however, initial studies suggest better tolerability and efficacy compared to conventional drugs and other antibodies. The role of antibodies in established treatment cascades still needs to be clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Hamann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopfschmerzzentrum Nord-Ost, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.
| | - Florian Rimmele
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopfschmerzzentrum Nord-Ost, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Tim Patrick Jürgens
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopfschmerzzentrum Nord-Ost, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.,Neurologisches Zentrum, Klinik für Neurologie, KMG Klinikum Güstrow, Güstrow, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|