Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement

The 45° and 60° of sagittal femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provide similar knee stability

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to compare 45° and 60° of sagittal femoral tunnel angles in terms of anterior tibial translation (ATT), valgus angle and graft in situ force following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Ten porcine knees were subjected to the following loading conditions: (1) 89 N anterior tibial load at 35° (full extension), 60° and 90° of knee flexion and (2) 5 N m valgus tibial moment at 35° and 45° of knee flexion. ATT and graft in situ force of the intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACLR were collected using a robotic universal force/moment sensor (UFS) testing system for (1) ACL intact, (2) ACL-deficient (ACLD) and (3) two different ACLR using different sagittal femoral tunnel angles (coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and coronal 45°/sagittal 60°).

RESULTS

During the anterior tibial load, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and 60° had significantly higher ATT than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). The femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 60° had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). During the valgus tibial moment, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and 60° had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at all knee flexions (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° provided similar ATT, valgus angle and graft in situ force to that of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 60°. Therefore, both femoral tunnel angles could be used in ACLR, as the sagittal femoral tunnel angle does not appear to be relevant in post-operative knee stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable.

App-based analysis of the femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction using the quadrant method

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interobserver variability of an app-based analysis of the femoral tunnel position using the quadrant method in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 12/2020 und 12/2021 50 patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included in this retrospective study. Intraoperative strictly lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee with marked femoral tunnel were analyzed by four observers using the quadrant method. For retest reliability analysis, measurements were repeated once by 2 observers after 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The femoral tunnel position of all included patients averaged 27.86% in the depth relation and 15.61% in the height relation. Statistical analysis showed an almost perfect intra- and interobserver reliability in the depth and height relation. The ICC was 0.92 in the depth relation and 0.84 in the height relation. The Pearson's correlation coefficient in the depth and height relation of observer 1 (0.94/0.81) was only slightly different from the Pearson's correlation coefficient of observer 2 (0.92/0.85). The app-based tunnel analysis took on average 59 ± 16 s per measurement.

CONCLUSION

The femoral tunnel analysis with the app-based quadrant method has an almost perfect intra- and interobserver reliability. By smartphone camera, a fast and highly accurate, if necessary also intraoperative, control of the tunnel position can be performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-diagnostic retrospective cohort study.

High flexion femoral side remnant preservation positioning technique: a new method for positioning the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to find a new method for femoral side preservation positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and test the accuracy and precision of this method.

METHOD

Fifty patients with isolated ACL rupture (42 males and 8 females) who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction in our hospital between July 2022 and July 2023 were included. The lowest point of the cartilage margin of the lateral wall of the intercontinental fossa and the tibial plateau plumb line at 120° of knee flexion were used as the anatomical landmarks for positioning of the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction surgery. Femoral side remnant preservation was performed in all cases. Three-dimensional CT was performed 3 days postoperatively to collect the data, which were analyzed using Mimics 21.0 software. We measured the posterior cortical distance of the femoral condyle at 90° of knee flexion and the vertical distance from the center of the bone tunnel to the cortical extension line behind the femur. All femoral tunnel positions were marked on a 4 × 4 grid and visualized using the quadrant method.

RESULTS

Using the new positioning method in 50 knees, the average distance of x was 25.26 ± 2.76% of t and the average distance of y was 23.69 ± 6.19% of h. This is close to the results of previous studies, where x was 24.2 ± 4.0% of t and the average distance of y was 21.6 ± 5.2% of h. Most femoral tunnel positions were located in the same area. The D values were distributed as follows: 60% in the range of 0 to 2 mm, 24% in the range of 2 to 4 mm, and 16% more than 4 mm. The E values were distributed as follows: 80% in the range of 0 to 4 mm and 20% more than 4 mm.

CONCLUSION

In arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, the knee was flexed at 120° and the lowest point of the cartilage edge of the lateral wall of the intercondylar fossa and the tibial plateau plumb line were used as anatomical landmarks for the positioning of the femoral bone tunnel, which resulted in more accurate femoral bone tunnel positioning, better reproducibility, and better preservation of the femoral stump compared to traditional positioning methods.

Race and Gender Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Footprint Location and Orientation: A 3D-MRI Study

OBJECTIVE

The femoral tunnel position is crucial to anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but the ideal femoral footprint position are mostly based on small-sized cadaveric studies and elderly patients with a single ethnic background. This study aimed to identify potential race- or gender-specific differences in the ACL femoral footprint location and ACL orientation, determine the correlation between the ACL orientation and the femoral footprint location.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 90 Caucasian participants and 90 matched Chinese subjects were used for reconstruction of three-dimensional (3D) femur and tibial models. ACL footprints were sketched by several experienced orthopedic surgeons on the MRI photographs. The anatomical coordinate system was applied to reflect the ACL footprint location and orientation of scanned samples. The femoral ACL footprint locations were represented by their distance from the origin in the anteroposterior (A/P) and distal-proximal (D/P) directions. The orientation of the ACL was described with the sagittal, coronal and transverse deviation angles. The ACL orientation and femoral footprint position were compared by the two-sided t-test. Multiple regression analysis was used to study the correlation between the orientation and femoral footprint position.

RESULTS

The average femur footprint A/P position was -6.6 ± 1.6 mm in the Chinese group and -5.1 ± 2.3 mm in the Caucasian group, (p < 0.001). The average femur footprint D/P position was -2.8 ± 2.4 mm in Chinese and - 3.9 ± 2.0 mm in Caucasians, (p = 0.001). The Chinese group had a mean difference of a 1.5 mm (6.1%) more posterior and 1.1 mm (5.3%) more proximal in the position from the flexion-extension axis (FEA). And the males have a sagittal plane elevation about 4-5° higher than females in both racial groups. Furthermore, for every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in A/P and D/P values, the sagittal angle decreased by about 0.12° and 0.24°, respectively; the coronal angle decreased by about 0.10° and 0.30°, respectively. For every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in D/P value, the transverse angle increased by about 0.14°.

CONCLUSION

The significant race- and gender-specific differences in the femoral footprint and orientation of the ACL should be taken in consideration during anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, the quantitative relationship between the ACL orientation and the footprint location might provide some reference for surgeons to develop a surgical strategy in ACL single-bundle reconstruction and revision.

3D assessment of graft malposition after ACL reconstruction: Comparison of native and 11o'clock ligament orientations

BACKGROUND

Femoral tunnel malposition makes up the majority of technical failures for ACL reconstructive surgery. The goal of this study was to develop adolescent knee models that accurately predict anterior tibial translation when undergoing a Lachman and pivot shift test with the ACL in the 11o'clock femoral malposition (Level of Evidence: IV).

METHODS

FEBio was used to build 22 subject-specific tibiofemoral joint finite element representations. To simulate the two clinical tests, the models were subject to loading and boundary conditions established in the literature. Clinical, historical control data were used to validate the predicted anterior tibial translations.

RESULTS

A 95% confidence interval showed that with the ACL in the 11o'clock malposition, the simulated Lachman and pivot shift tests produced anterior tibial translations that were not statistically different from the in vivo data. The 11o'clock finite element knee models resulted in greater anterior displacement than those with the native (approximately 10o'clock) ACL position. The difference in anterior tibial translation between the native and 11o'clock ACL orientations was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Clinically, by understanding the impact that ACL orientation has in anterior tibial displacement biomechanics, surgical interventions can be improved to prevent technical errors from occurring. The integration of this methodology into surgical practice not only allows for anatomical visualization prior to surgery, but also creates the opportunity to optimize graft placement, thus improving post-surgical outcomes.

Arthroscopic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Graft: A Single-Institution Experience From North-Eastern India

Background There is a lack of literature regarding the arthroscopic approach to a single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the quadrupled hamstring tendon graft in the north-eastern Indian population. Methodology A prospective, single-center study was planned for patients with ACL tears according to the eligibility criteria and with a defined surgical protocol. Patients were followed up from the preoperative period for at least one year, and knee function was evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score and the Lysholm knee score. Results A total of 29 patients were followed up for a mean of 14.6 months (12-22 months). The mean age of patients was 26.83 ± 7.50 years, with a male:female ratio of 4.8:1 and almost equal involvement of both knees. There was statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) in results in the Lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test, IKDC score, and Lysholm score. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were found in the present study. Discussion The study shows that arthroscopic anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon grafts is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective procedure that provides anteroposterior and rotational stability and good to excellent functional outcomes.

Cyclops lesions associated with both bundles and selective bundle repair of the anterior cruciate ligament

BACKGROUND

The remnant of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can increase the risk of impingement or a cyclops lesion, which can increase challenges to proper tunnel placement.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of cyclops lesions after ACL reconstruction and to assess the difference in the incidence of cyclops lesions between single-bundle repair and selective bundle repair of the ACL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 151 patients who were diagnosed with an ACL tear after knee joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. MRI diagnosis of cyclops lesion formation was made if a soft-tissue mass was seen anteriorly in the intercondylar notch near the tibial insertion of the reconstructed ACL, based on sagittal T2-weighted (T2W) imaging. The size of the cyclops lesions was recorded as the largest diameter on the sagittal T2W imaging.

RESULTS

A cyclops lesion was detected in 74 (38.5%) cases. Cyclops lesions were detected more frequently in cases with single-bundle repair of the ACL, but the results were not statistically significant (P = 0.609). Compared with selective bundle repair, cyclops lesions had a significantly higher prevalence in the posterolateral (PL) bundle repair than in the anteromedial (AM) bundle repair (P = 0.027) based on MR images at 6-12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of cyclops lesions did not differ significantly in single-bundle repair and selective bundle repair of ACL. However, selective PL bundle repair of the ACL showed a significantly increased incidence of cyclops lesions compared with selective AM bundle repair.

Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is a complication that may require revision ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Non-anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel is thought to be a frequent cause of graft failure; however, there is a lack of evidence to support this belief. The purpose of this study was to determine if non-anatomic femoral tunnel placement is associated with increased risk of revision ACL-R.

METHODS

After screening all 315 consecutive patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL-R by a single senior orthopedic surgeon between January 2012 and January 2017, 58 patients were found to have both strict lateral radiographs and a minimum of 24 months follow-up without revision. From a group of 456 consecutive revision ACL-R, patients were screened for strictly lateral radiographs and 59 patients were included in the revision group. Femoral tunnel placement for each patient was determined using a strict lateral radiograph taken after the primary ACL-R using the quadrant method. The center of the femoral tunnel was measured in both the posterior-anterior (PA) and proximal-distal (PD) dimensions and represented as a percentage of the total distance (normal center of anatomic footprint: PA 25% and PD 29%).

RESULTS

In the PA dimension, the revision group had significantly more anterior femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (38% ± 11% vs. 28% ± 6%, p < 0.01). Among patients who underwent revision; those with non-traumatic chronic failure had statistically significant more anterior femoral tunnel placement than those who experienced traumatic failure (41% ± 13% vs. 35% ± 8%, p < 0.03). In the PD dimension, the revision group had significantly more proximal femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (30% ± 9% vs 38% ± 9%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study of 58 patients with successful primary ACL-R compared with 59 patients with failed ACL-R, anterior and proximal (high) femoral tunnels for ACL-R were shown to be independent risk factors for ACL revision surgery. As revision ACL-R is associated with patient- and economic burden, particular attention should be given to achieving an individualized, anatomic primary ACL-R. Surgeons may reduce the risk of revision ACL-R by placing the center of the femoral tunnel within the anatomic ACL footprint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A Modified Anatomic Transtibial Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides Reliable Bone Tunnel Positioning

Purpose

To evaluate the femoral and tibial tunnel positions via a modified anatomic transtibial double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

Patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the transtibial tunnel creation technique were identified. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed for 94 knees using the transtibial tunnel creation technique. Tunnel aperture configurations and center positions of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnels via postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography were evaluated.

Results

There were 94 knees included. Regarding the intra-articular tunnel aperture configurations, the AM and PL tunnels overlapped at the femoral and tibial aperture in 66.0% and 94.7% cases, respectively. The mean femoral bone tunnel center was located at 23.0 ± 3.9% in the posterior-to-anterior ratio and 28.7 ± 6.0% in the proximal-to-distal ratio for the AM tunnels and at 32.8 ± 4.7% and 51.2 ± 5.2% for the PL tunnels, respectively. In the tibial tunnels, the mean AM tunnel center was located at 31.4 ± 3.6% in the anterior-to-posterior ratio and 44.3 ± 1.8% in the medial-to-lateral ratio and at 47.5 ± 3.8% and 44.3 ± 1.9% in the PL tunnel center, respectively. The femoral tunnels of outliers, both those created in nonanatomic positions as well as the posterior wall blowouts, were revealed in 7.4% cases. The nonanatomical bone tunnel group had significant heavier weight patients, lower tibial posterior slope, and were anterior in the AM and PL tunnel position. Posterior wall blowouts were related to posterior and proximal PL bone tunnel positions.

Conclusions

Modified transtibial double-bundle ACL reconstruction is a reliable tunnel creation technique with anatomic placement in 92.6% of the cases. The modification required that partially superimposing configuration of the 2 tibial tunnel apertures. The nonanatomic tunnels were related to patients of heavier weight and lower tibial posterior sloped knees, whereas the posterior wall blowouts were related to the posterior and proximal PL bone tunnel positions.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Effect of Tunnel Drilling Portal on Femoral Tunnel Entry Aperture’s Location in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Introduction

Transportal techniques for femoral tunnel drilling have the advantage of anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which was earlier difficult to achieve through transtibial femoral tunnels. However, the medial arthroscopic portal used for femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has not been uniformly placed in different studies. Therefore, we performed a computed tomography-based analysis to compare the femoral tunnel entry aperture of the ACLR cases that used the standard AM portal and those using a far medial portal for femoral tunnel drilling.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography images of patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACLR in our institute with either standard anteromedial portal or the far medial portal used for the femoral tunnel drilling. The femoral tunnel aperture's depth and height, measured using the quadrant method, were compared between the two portal methods.

Results

A total of forty-two case records were reviewed, sixteen belonging to standard anteromedial portal technique and twenty-six belonging to far medial portal technique. The tunnels created through the far AM portal were significantly shallower (more anterior) and inferior than the standard AM portal-created femoral tunnels.

Conclusion

The choice of drilling portals can influence transportal femoral tunnel drilling. A tendency towards anterior and inferior positioning of the femoral tunnel entry aperture has been observed when a far medial arthroscopic portal is used for femoral tunnel drilling. Therefore, care must be taken to ensure that the drilling guide pin position does not change when the reamer is passed over it.

Freehand Anatomic Transtibial Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Creation of the femoral tunnel for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has a high rate of nonanatomic placement with the transtibial (TT) technique but yields better restoration with the anteromedial portal technique and close restoration of the anatomic femoral footprint with the outside-in technique. Modifications of the traditional (TT) technique have been described to restore the native femoral ACL footprint and to simulate double-bundle reconstruction. Modified TT techniques try to capture the anatomic femoral footprint through an anatomic tibial tunnel. In the technique described in this article, the anatomic femoral footprint is drilled first by the use of a 2.5-mm Kirschner wire through the parapatellar anteromedial portal, making an angle 30° to the sagittal plane and 20° to the horizontal plane. The wire is drilled while the knee is hyperflexed and then withdrawn from outside until its distal end reaches the intercondylar notch. The wire is then advanced in an antegrade manner while the knee is flexed 90° until it reaches the center of the marked tibial footprint. The angle of knee flexion may be slightly increased or decreased around 90° with or without slight internal rotation to capture the anatomic tibial footprint. The procedure is completed as a TT single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Ideal Combination of Anatomic Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Positions for Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Background:

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is preferred over nonanatomic ACLR. However, there is no consensus on which point the tunnels should be positioned among the broad anatomic footprints.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

To identify the ideal combination of tibial and femoral tunnel positions according to the femoral and tibial footprints of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) anterior cruciate ligament bundles. It was hypothesized that patients with anteromedially positioned tunnels would have better clinical scores, knee joint stability, and graft signal intensity on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) than those with posterolaterally positioned tunnels.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 119 patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACLR with a hamstring autograft from July 2013 to September 2018 were retrospectively investigated. Included were patients with clinical scores and knee joint stability test results at 2-year follow-up and postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography and 1-year postoperative MRI findings. The cohort was divided into 4 groups, named according to the bundle positions in the tibial and femoral tunnels: AM-AM (n = 33), AM-PL (n = 26), PL-AM (n = 29), and PL-PL (n = 31).

Results:

There were no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups in preoperative demographic data or postoperative clinical scores (Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores); knee joint stability (anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests and Telos stress radiographic measurement of the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation); graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI; or graft failure.

Conclusion:

No significant differences in clinical scores, knee joint stability, or graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI were identified between the patients with anteromedially and posterolaterally positioned tunnels.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction after Surgical Management of Multiligament Knee Injury

The purpose of this study is to determine factors associated with the need for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) after multiligament knee injury (MLKI) and to report outcomes for patients undergoing revision ACLR after MLKI. This involves a retrospective review of 231 MLKIs in 225 patients treated over a 12-year period, with institutional review board approval. Patients with two or more injured knee ligaments requiring surgical reconstruction, including the ACL, were included for analyses. Overall, 231 knees with MLKIs underwent ACLR, with 10% (n = 24) requiring revision ACLR. There were no significant differences in age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, or body mass index between cohorts requiring or not requiring revision ACLR. However, patients requiring revision ACLR had significantly longer follow-up duration (55.1 vs. 37.4 months, p = 0.004), more ligament reconstructions/repairs (mean 3.0 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001), more nonligament surgeries (mean 2.2 vs. 0.7, p = 0.002), more total surgeries (mean 5.3 vs. 2.4, p < 0.001), and more graft reconstructions (mean 4.7 vs. 2.7, p < 0.001). Patients in both groups had similar return to work (p = 0.12) and activity (p = 0.91) levels at final follow-up. Patients who had revision ACLR took significantly longer to return to work at their highest level (18 vs. 12 months, p = 0.036), but similar time to return to their highest level of activity (p = 0.33). Range of motion (134 vs. 127 degrees, p = 0.14), pain severity (2.2 vs. 1.7, p = 0.24), and Lysholm's scores (86.3 vs. 90.0, p = 0.24) at final follow-up were similar between groups. Patients requiring revision ACLR in the setting of a MLKI had more overall concurrent surgeries and other ligament reconstructions, but had similar final outcome scores to those who did not require revision surgery. Revision ligament surgery can be associated with increased pain, stiffness, and decrease patient outcomes. Revision surgery is often necessary after multiligament knee reconstructions, but patients requiring ACLR in the setting of a MLKI have good overall outcomes, with patients requiring revision ACLR at a rate of 10%.

Clinical Outcomes of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Combined With Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Residual rotational instability after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been a challenge for many years. Anterolateral extra-articular procedures (AEAPs), including anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), are performed as a surgical option for additional rotational stability, but clear evidence for their usefulness is lacking.

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature regarding the efficacy of AEAP in primary ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched in April 2020, following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 3444 studies were screened, and 20 studies (11 randomized controlled trials and 9 nonrandomized studies) were evaluated. Functional outcomes, stability, and complications were compared between patients who underwent primary ACLR with AEAP and those who underwent isolated primary ACLR. For subgroup analysis, outcomes were compared according to AEAP technique (ALLR vs LET) and time from injury to surgery (≤12 vs >12 months). The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, Jadad scale, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Compared with isolated ACLR, combined ACLR with AEAP led to improved pivot-shift grades and graft failure rates, regardless of the AEAP technique or of time from injury to surgery. A limited, marginal improvement in subjective function score was observed in patients who underwent AEAP combined with ACLR. In contrast to ALLR, patients who underwent LET combined with ACLR had an increased risk of knee stiffness and adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our review suggests that when there is a need to improve rotational stability and subjective function, AEAP combined with primary ACLR can be considered regardless of time from injury. ALLR appeared to be a better option for improving rotational stability compared with LET.

Anterior root of lateral meniscus and medial tibial spine are reliable intraoperative landmarks for the tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

The aims of the present study were (1) to investigate the tibial footprint location of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in both ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact patients, (2) to identify the relationship of the tibial footprint to the anterior root of the lateral meniscus (ARLM) and medial tibial spine (MTS), and (3) to evaluate the reliability of the ARLM and MTS for identifying the center of the tibial ACL footprint.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of 90 knees with ACL rupture and 90 matched-controlled knees were used to create three-dimensional models of the tibia. The tibial ACL footprint was outlined on each model, and its location was measured using an anatomical coordinate system.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the location of the tibial footprint was found between ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact knees. The tibial ACL footprint was located in very close proximity to the ARLM, especially in the M/L direction. The safe zone of tibial tunnel reaming for avoiding damage to the ARLM was 2.6 mm lateral to the center of the native tibial footprint. Both the ARLM and MTS were reliable intraoperative landmarks for identifying the tibial footprint.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the safe zone of tibial tunnel reaming for avoiding injury to the ARLM. Both the ARLM and MTS might be reliable landmarks for identifying the center of the tibial ACL footprint and may facilitate tibial tunnel placement during anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction, especially in cases of revision where the tibial ACL stump is not available.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Physeal-sparing posteromedial portal approach reduced distance between guide pin and neurovascular structures

PURPOSE

To compare a femoral physeal sparing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique utilizing a posteromedial portal to traditional transphyseal techniques with regards to anatomic tunnel positioning and proximity to important neurovascular structures.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric knees were obtained for the study. Femoral tunnel guide pins were placed utilizing four different techniques: accessory anterior medial portal, posteromedial portal, trans-tibial, and figure-4 methods. The knees were then dissected and the following measurements taken: distance of each pin to the saphenous and peroneal nerve, popliteus tendon, neurovascular bundle, femoral ACL footprint and articular cartilage, and the angle of the guide pin entering the lateral femoral condyle. Fluoroscopic imaging was taken to determine the disruption of the physeal scar.

RESULTS

Posteromedial portal guide pin was significantly closer to the neurovascular bundle, popliteal tendon and saphenous nerve when compared to the other 3 techniques, but was further from the peroneal nerve. It also had the smallest distance from the anatomic footprint of the ACL, and the largest angle to the lateral femoral condyle. The posteromedial portal guide pin had similar distance from the articular cartilage as the accessory anterior medial portal and figure-4 guide pin, with the trans-tibial guide pin being the farthest. The posteromedial portal guide pin failed to disrupt the physeal scar in all specimens, while the other three techniques consistently violated the physeal scar.

CONCLUSION

The posteromedial portal technique offers an appropriate method for anatomic ACL reconstruction while protecting the distal femoral physis from injury. Care needs to be taken with this technique as it comes in closer proximity to some of the important neurovascular structures. This study indicates that posteromedial portal technique is a less technically challenging approach for physeal-sparing ACL repair with special attention required for the protection of neurovascular bundle from potential injury.

Editorial Commentary: Remember the Risk Factors During Individualized, Anatomic, Value-Based Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Understanding the etiology behind anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure is a complex topic still being investigated heavily. The 3 classes of failure are technical, traumatic, and biologic. Technical errors are most common and most frequently reflect tunnel malposition. In addition, tibial slope has long been understood to be a risk factor for failed ACL reconstruction. Although not routinely performed at time of primary ACL reconstruction, osteotomy may be considered in the setting of failed ACL reconstruction. Relative quadriceps weakness is a risk factor, and we recommend sport-specific return-to-play testing as well as benchmarks for relative quadriceps strength before full return to activity. Revision ACL reconstruction is associated with both increased costs and worse patient outcomes, so every effort should be made to give patients the best chance of success after the index surgery. Whereas this begins with understanding the patient's history and risk factors for failure, it crescendos with careful attention to the individually variable factors that make each case unique, tailoring one's management to ensure that each patient receives an anatomic, individualized, and value-based ACL reconstruction.

Risk of overconstraining femorotibial rotation after anatomical ACL reconstruction using bone patella tendon bone autograft

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies have focused on the anteroposterior stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with less emphasis on rotational stability. It has been hypothesized that bone patella tendon bone (BTB) autograft for ACL reconstruction restores knee rotation closely to normal due to its comparable fiber orientation to the native ACL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with unilateral ACL rupture and an uninjured contralateral knee were included in this study. The ACL was reconstructed using the medial third of the patellar tendon. Tunnel placement was controlled by fluoroscopy. Implant-free press-fit graft fixation was used on both femoral and tibial side. Bone blocks were carefully placed to restore fiber orientation of both the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle, similar to the native ACL. Rotatory laxity of both knees was measured at 0° and 25° of flexion pre- and post-surgery, using an active opto-electronical motion-analysis system (LUKOTRONIC AS 100^®). All measurements were performed under general anesthesia during surgery.

RESULTS

Knee rotation was reduced significantly in both 0°and 25° of flexion following ACL reconstruction (p < 0.001). The side to side difference (SSD) of the rotatory laxity in extension was greater in the ACL-deficient knee (14.9° ± 8.9°), but decreased significantly after ACL reconstruction (- 5.9° ± 7.7°, minus value means less than in the uninjured knee). There was a similar finding at 25° of knee flexion where greater rotation of the ACL-deficient knee (5.7° ± 10.3°) prior to surgery changed to lower degree of rotation after surgery (- 11.3° ± 8.4°) in comparison to the uninjured knee.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft in anatomical position using press-fit implant-free fixation is able to restore rotatory knee stability close to the intact contralateral knee. Despite the fact that the BTB graft offers fiber orientation close to the natural ACL, the surgeon should be aware of the potential risk of over-constraining the knee in terms of rotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Parameters with Two Different Surgical Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

This study compared the clinical and radiological findings of nonanatomic transtibial (TT) technique with intraspongious fixation and anatomical anteromedial portal (AMP) technique with extracortical button implant in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A total of 54 patients with isolated ACL rupture were included in this prospective study. The patients who had the intraspongious fixation by nonanatomical TT technique were allocated to Group 1 (n = 27). The patients with extracortical fixation by anatomical AMP technique were placed in Group 2 (n = 27). The clinical scores of the patients were evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee Evaluation Form, Tegner activity score, and Lysholm II Functional Scoring. The tibial and femoral tunnels were evaluated with three-dimensional computed tomography. The kinematic examinations were performed with a Biodex System 3 Pro isokinetic dynamometer. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data (p > 0.05). The postoperative clinical scores improved significantly in both the groups compared with the preoperative levels (p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical scores between the groups (p > 0.05). In the extension and flexion of 60 to 180 degrees/s, the peak torque and the peak torque/body weight values of the repaired knee to intact knee ratios showed significant differences in favor of Group 2 (p = 0.001). In both the groups, no significant difference was found between the mean extent of the tunnel enlargement (p > 0.05). The mean tunnel height was significantly greater in Group 1 (45% ± 9.86 vs. 34.11% ± 10.0%) (p = 0.001). When the localization of the tunnel enlargements (proximal-middle-distal) was examined, a significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.001). Although the AMP technique, which is a more anatomic reconstruction, had an advantage with regard to tunnel enlargement and the isokinetic muscle studies, there was no difference between the two techniques in terms of the clinical results.

Biomechanical comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Of the many issues regarding surgical techniques related to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) ACLR is one of the most debated topics. However, it is unclear which of the techniques yields better outcomes after ACLR for ACL injury. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the benefits of SB versus DB ACLR in terms of biomechanical outcomes.

METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant articles comparing the outcomes of SB-ACLR versus DB-ACLR that were published until November 2019.

RESULTS

Seventeen biomechanical studies were included. The anterior laxity measured using the anterior drawer test showed significantly better results in DB-ACLR when compared with SB-ACLR. In addition, outcomes of the anterior tibial translation test under a simulated pivot shift presented with better results at low flexion and 30° in DB-ACLR, compared with SB-ACLR. However, there were no significant biomechanical differences between the groups in internal rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that both techniques for ACLR are associated with restoration of normal knee kinematics. DB-ACLR is superior to SB-ACLR in terms of restoration of anteroposterior stability. However, which technique yields better improvement in internal rotation laxity, and internal rotation laxity under a simulated pivot shift at a specific angle, remains unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a level II meta-analysis.

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Persistent anterolateral rotatory laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been correlated with poor clinical outcomes and graft failure.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that a single-bundle, hamstring ACLR in combination with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) would reduce the risk of ACLR failure in young, active individuals.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing a single-bundle, hamstring tendon ACLR with or without LET performed using a strip of iliotibial band. Patients 25 years or younger with an ACL-deficient knee were included and also had to meet at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: (1) grade 2 pivot shift or greater, (2) a desire to return to high-risk/pivoting sports, (3) and generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL). The primary outcome was ACLR clinical failure, a composite measure of rotatory laxity or a graft rupture. Secondary outcome measures included the P4 pain scale, Marx Activity Rating Scale, Knee injury Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score, and ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 618 patients (297 males; 48%) with a mean age of 18.9 years (range, 14-25 years) were randomized. A total of 436 (87.9%) patients presented preoperatively with high-grade rotatory laxity (grade 2 pivot shift or greater), and 215 (42.1%) were diagnosed as having GLL. There were 18 patients lost to follow-up and 11 who withdrew (~5%). In the ACLR group, 120/298 (40%) patients sustained the primary outcome of clinical failure, compared with 72/291 (25%) in the ACLR+LET group (relative risk reduction [RRR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.52; P < .0001). A total of 45 patients experienced graft rupture, 34/298 (11%) in the ACLR group compared with 11/291 (4%) in the ACL+LET group (RRR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83; P < .001). The number needed to treat with LET to prevent 1 patient from graft rupture was 14.3 over the first 2 postoperative years. At 3 months, patients in the ACLR group had less pain as measured by the P4 (P = .003) and KOOS (P = .007), with KOOS pain persisting in favor of the ACLR group to 6 months (P = .02). No clinically important differences in patient-reported outcome measures were found between groups at other time points. The level of sports activity was similar between groups at 2 years after surgery, as measured by the Marx Activity Rating Scale (P = .11).

CONCLUSION

The addition of LET to a single-bundle hamstring tendon autograft ACLR in young patients at high risk of failure results in a statistically significant, clinically relevant reduction in graft rupture and persistent rotatory laxity at 2 years after surgery.

REGISTRATION

NCT02018354 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

The Femoral Footprint Position of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Might Be a Predisposing Factor to a Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

BACKGROUND

Although the femoral tunnel position is crucial to anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the recommendations for the ideal femoral footprint position are mostly based on cadaveric studies with small sample sizes, elderly patients with unknown ACL status, and 2-dimensional techniques. Furthermore, a potential difference in the femoral ACL footprint position and ACL orientation between ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact knees has not been reported in the literature.

HYPOTHESIS

The femoral ACL footprint position and ACL orientation vary significantly between ACL-ruptured and matched control ACL-intact knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of the knees of 90 patients with an ACL rupture and 90 matched control participants who had a noncontact knee injury without an ACL rupture were used to create 3-dimensional models of the femur and tibia. The ACL footprints were outlined on each model, and their positions (normalized to the lateral condyle width) as well as ACL orientations were measured with an anatomic coordinate system.

RESULTS

The femoral ACL footprint in patients with an ACL rupture was located at 36.6% posterior and 11.2% distal to the flexion-extension axis (FEA). The ACL orientation was 46.9° in the sagittal plane, 70.3° in the coronal plane, and 20.8° in the transverse plane. The ACL-ruptured group demonstrated a femoral ACL footprint position that was 11.0% more posterior and 7.7% more proximal than that of the control group (all P < .01). The same patients also exhibited 5.7° lower sagittal elevation, 3.1° higher coronal plane elevation, and 7.9° lower transverse plane deviation (all P < .01). The optimal cutoff value of the femoral ACL footprint position to prevent an ACL rupture was at 30% posterior and 12% distal to the FEA.

CONCLUSION

The ACL femoral footprint position might be a predisposing factor to an ACL rupture. Patients with a >30% posterior and <12% distal position of the femoral ACL footprint from the FEA might have a 51.2-times increased risk of an ACL rupture.

Anatomical Variability of Intercondylar Fossa Geometry in Patients Diagnosed with Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

The aims of this study were to (1) describe the three-dimensional characteristics and sources of anatomical variability in the geometry of the intercondylar fossa ("notch") in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured sample and (2) assess the relationship between patient factors and anatomical variability of the fossa in the context of impingement risk. A retrospective analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for 49 patients with ACL rupture was performed. Scans were examined in the axial plane using an online picture archiving and communication system (PACS) viewer and fossa width and angle assessed at multiple slices, as well as anteroposterior depth, fossa height, and calculated total volume. Principal component analysis was performed to prioritize the sources of variability. A multivariate linear regression was performed to assess relationships between different patient factors, controlling for imaging parameters and principal component loadings. Geometric properties were normally distributed for all but fossa volume, height, and distal angle. Three principal components (PCs) were identified explaining 80% of total variance, shape (PC1), size in the coronal plane (PC2), and size in the sagittal plane (PC3). Patient factors were significantly (P < 0.05) related to PC loadings; however, a substantial amount of variance in each model remained unexplained. Intercondylar fossa characteristics vary considerably within ACL-injury patients with shape and size in coronal and axial planes, explaining most of the variance. Although patient factors are associated with anatomical characteristics, further work is required to identify the correct combination of factors accurately predicting geometry of the fossa for planning ACL reconstruction. Clin. Anat. 33:610-618, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Tibiofemoral Kinematics During Compressive Loading of the ACL-Intact and ACL-Sectioned Knee: Roles of Tibial Slope, Medial Eminence Volume, and Anterior Laxity

BACKGROUND

Tibial geometry and knee laxity have been identified as risk factors for both noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and instability in the setting of ACL insufficiency via clinical studies; yet, their biomechanical relationships with tibiofemoral kinematics during compressive loading are less well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify the relative contributions of sagittal tibial slope, medial tibial eminence volume, and anterior knee laxity to tibiofemoral kinematics with axial compression in both ACL-intact and ACL-sectioned cadaveric knees.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) data were collected from 13 human cadaveric knees (mean donor age, 45 ± 11 years; 8 male). Validated algorithms were used to calculate the sagittal slope of the medial and of the lateral tibial plateau as well as volume of the medial tibial eminence. Specimens were then mounted to a robotic manipulator. For both intact and ACL-sectioned conditions, the robot compressed the knee from 10 to 300 N at 15° of flexion; the net anterior tibial translation of the medial and lateral compartments and internal tibial rotation were recorded. Simple and multiple linear regressions were performed to identify correlations between kinematic outcomes and (1) osseous geometric parameters and (2) anterior laxity during a simulated Lachman test.

RESULTS

In ACL-intact knees, anterior tibial translation of each compartment was positively correlated with the corresponding sagittal slope, and internal tibial rotation was positively correlated with the lateral sagittal slope and the sagittal slope differential (p ≤ 0.044). In ACL-sectioned knees, anterior tibial translation of the medial compartment was positively associated with medial sagittal slope as well as a combination of medial tibial eminence volume and anterior laxity; internal tibial rotation was inversely correlated with anterior knee laxity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Under compressive loading, sagittal slope of the medial and of the lateral tibial plateau was predictive of kinematics with the ACL intact, while medial tibial eminence volume and anterior laxity were predictive of kinematics with the ACL sectioned.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The relationships between tibial osseous morphology, anterior laxity, and knee kinematics under compression may help explain heightened risk of ACL injury and might predict knee instability after ACL rupture.

The Laxity of the Native Knee: A Meta-Analysis of in Vitro Studies

BACKGROUND

Although soft-tissue balancing plays an important role in knee arthroplasty, we are aware of no objective target parameters describing the soft-tissue tension of the native knee. In the present study, we aimed to meta-analyze data from studies investigating native knee laxity to create a guide for creating a naturally balanced knee joint.

METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies with laxity data published from 1996 through 2016. Graphs were digitally segmented in cases in which numerical data were not available in text or table form. Three-level random-effects meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy-six studies evaluating knee laxity at various flexion angles (0° to 90°) were included. Knee laxity was significantly different between 0° and 90° of flexion (p < 0.001) in all 6 testing directions, with mean differences of 0.94 mm and -0.35 mm for anterior and posterior translation, 1.61° and 4.25° for varus and valgus rotation, and 1.62° and 6.42° for internal and external rotation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee laxity was dependent on the flexion angle of the knee joint in all degrees of freedom investigated. Furthermore, asymmetry between anterior-posterior, varus-valgus, and internal-external rotation was substantial and depended on the joint flexion angle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

If the goal of knee arthroplasty is to restore the kinematics of the knee as well as possible, pooled laxity data of the intact soft tissue envelope could be useful as a general guide for soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty.

Re-revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Evaluation From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry

PURPOSE

To identify the rate of re-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to estimate the influence of patient-related factors on the risk of re-revision ACLR. The secondary aim of the study was to report the intra-articular findings and patient-related factors at the time of revision ACLR and to compare these with the findings in a matched controlled group of primary ACLR.

METHODS

Patients with primary ACLR without a subsequent need of revision and patients with a revision ACLR identified in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry from June 2004 through September 2016 were included. Using age at operation, sex, activity at injury, and year of ACLR as covariates, a propensity score matched control group of primary ACLR patients for the revision ACLR patients was identified. For the revision ACLR patients, re-revision ACLR rates at 1, 2, 5, and 8 years were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis; the hazard ratio for a re-revision ACLR was estimated using a multivariable Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The cumulative estimated proportion of patients undergoing a re-revision ACLR at 1, 2, 5, and 8 years after the original revision ACLR was 0.4%, 3.0%, 6.5%, and 9.0% respectively. There was no significant difference between the control and revision ACLR groups regarding cartilage injury (P = .72) or associated ligament injury (P = .17). Revision ACLR patients did have fewer meniscal injuries (P < .001). There were no intraoperative findings or surgical techniques identified as a predictor for a higher risk of re-revision ACLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a review of a large ligament reconstruction registry,one can expect 9% of patients to undergo a re-revision ALCR at 8 years of follow up. Revision ACLR did not have an increase in cartilage injuries or associated ligament injuries and had significantly fewer meniscal injuries compared with a primary ACLR control group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of Graft Length Changes During Knee Motion Among 5 Different Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Approaches: A Biomechanical Study

Background:

In several anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ASB-ACLR) procedures, the femoral and tibial tunnel apertures are created at different locations within the native ACL attachment area.

Hypothesis:

Graft length changes during knee motion will be different among ASB-ACLR procedures with different femoral and tibial tunnel aperture locations.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

A total of 12 cadaveric knees were used in this study. In each knee, 4 and 3 thin tunnels were created within the ACL attachment area on the femur and the tibia, respectively. Using 1 of 5 different combinations of femoral and tibial tunnel aperture location, 5 ASB-ACLRs were performed on each knee. In each reconstruction approach, a strong thread was used in place of the tendon graft, and the tibial graft end was tethered to a custom-made isometric positioner at 0° of knee flexion, with an approximately 12-N load applied to the thread. Then, each specimen underwent 5 cycles of knee flexion-extension motion in a range between 0° and 120°, and graft length changes were determined for each SB-ACLR approach.

Results:

The length changes of the graft were significantly different among the 5 ASB-ACLRs. The maximum length change values of the 3 grafts that were implanted between the femoral and tibial centers of the posterolateral bundle attachments or implanted into the femoral tunnel created at the center of the fanlike extension fiber attachment were significantly greater than those of the graft implanted between the centers of the anteromedial bundle attachments (P < .0001) and of the graft implanted between the centers of the whole ACL attachments (P < .0001).

Conclusion:

The length changes of the graft during knee motion were significantly different among the 5 ASB-ACLR approaches, even though all of the tunnel apertures were created within the femoral and tibial attachments of the native ACL.

Clinical Relevance:

The grafts in the first 3 graft locations may be so relaxed during knee flexion that they cannot resist anterior drawer loads exerted on the tibia.

Partial meniscectomy adversely affects return-to-sport outcome after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to determine whether the partial meniscectomy combined with ACL reconstruction affect the postoperative return-to-sport and to identify if partial meniscectomy has an influence on the graft failure following an anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction case.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including 426 primary double bundle ACL reconstruction cases. There were 206 males and 220 females, median age of 28.4 years, median BMI of 23.0, median preinjury Tegner score of 7.0 and median follow-up period after surgery of 24.0 months. Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up, revision surgery, multi-ligaments injury, previous contralateral knee ligaments injury and postoperative infection cases were excluded. Furthermore, patients who had meniscal repair were excluded in order to compare the outcomes between patients who had intact menisci and those who underwent partial meniscectomy. There were 227 patients with intact menisci (group A) and 199 patients with partial meniscectomy (group B). The median age was younger and the preoperative Tegner score was higher in group A. The patients in group B were subcategorized as the site of partial meniscectomy, including medial (group C), lateral (group D) and bicompartmental (group E) meniscectomy. There were 74, 94, and 31 patients in group C, D, and E, respectively. Return-to-sport (running and sport phase) and graft failure were included in our primary outcomes, and functional outcome as Lysholm knee scores was included in secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The rate of return to running phase and sport phase were 91% (387/426) and 76% (303/399), the mean time taken to return to running and sport phase were 5.7 months and 11.1 months, respectively. There was significant difference in the returning to sport phase between group A and B (p = 0.01), and between group A and D/E subgroups (p = 0.007). There were fourteen graft failures (3.5%) in total. In addition, 9 and 5 graft failures in group A and B, respectively. Of the 5 graft failures in group B, 2 and 3 graft failures in group C and D, respectively. There was no significant difference of the graft failure ratio among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that partial meniscectomy has an adverse effect on the return to sport phase following the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Therefore, greater postoperative care would be needed to return to sport with partial meniscectomy in ACL reconstruction cases. On the contrary, partial meniscectomy is not considered to be the risk factor for graft failure at short-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, Level III.

Shallow knee flexion angle during femoral tunnel creation using modified transtibial technique can reduce femoral graft bending angle in ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare femoral graft bending angle between patients with femoral tunnel reamed at less than 80° of knee flexion and those with 80° and above in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using modified transtibial technique.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar-tendon-bone autograft in modified transtibial technique and CT scan at 1 week postoperatively were included in this study. A femoral guidewire insertion into aimed femoral position at the medial wall of the femoral lateral condyle was started at about 75° of knee flexion. When the tip of the guidewire was blown out into femoral posterior wall, the guidewire was inserted again after increasing knee flexion angle. Distance from femoral tunnel exit on the femoral lateral cortex-femoral posterior cortex (Distance-E) was measured on postoperative lateral radiograph. Femoral and tibial tunnel position was measured on 3-D CT images. In addition, femoral graft bending angle was measured on reconstructed 2-D CT images. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether femoral tunnel was created at less than 80° of knee flexion (group A) or 80° or more (group B).

RESULTS

There were 32 patients in group A and 16 patients in group B, respectively. Average knee flexion angle was 77.2° [standard deviation (SD) 1.6] in group A and 83.6° (SD 2.4) in group B, respectively (p < 0.05). Average Distance-E was 5.1 mm (SD 2.6) in group A and 6.6 mm (SD 3.8) in group B, respectively. There was no significant difference in the femoral and tibial tunnel position between group A and B. Femoral graft bending angle was significantly smaller in group A [average angle: 50.9° (SD 6.6)] than in group B [average angle: 55.0° (SD 6.6)] (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical femoral tunnel was able to be created at less than 80° of knee flexion in two-thirds of patients. Shallower flexion angle (less than 80°) provided gentler femoral graft bending angle compared to 80° or more of knee flexion. Therefore, femoral tunnel creation in modified transtibial technique should be started at between 75° and 80° of knee flexion to reduce femoral graft bending angle. Shallow knee flexion angle during femoral tunnel creation using modified transtibial technique can reduce femoral graft bending angle and may lead to better clinical outcomes in ACL reconstruction.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Comparison of three approaches for femoral tunnel during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A case controlled study

BACKGROUND

It is still controversial whether which femoral tunnel creation technique is best during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We aimed to clarify the features of three different techniques based on the femoral tunnel position created with the same tunnel-creating concept and the measurement data.

METHODS

The femoral tunnel of double-bundle (DB) ACLR was created using the behind-remnant approach in a remnant preserved manner following the policy of our institute. The trans-tibial approach (TT) was applied for all primary ACL injured cases until December 2012. The trans-portal approach (TP) was applied from January to September 2013, and the outside-in approach (OI) was indicated from October 2013 to March 2014. We compared the femoral tunnel aperture positions with the postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Additionally, the femoral tunnel length and the septum distance of each anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnel were analyzed.

RESULTS

The AM tunnel aperture position of TT was significantly higher and shallower than that of TP in knee flexion position. The femoral tunnel length of TP was significantly shorter than that of TT and OI. The septum between each tunnel of OI trended wider than that of TT and TP.

CONCLUSIONS

The AM tunnel aperture position of TT runs the risk of a high and shallow position. TP runs the risk of insufficiently short tunnel length. It is important to apply each method flexibly to each case because no single best approach was found.

Tibiofemoral joint contact area and stress after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling techniques

Background

During single-bundle ACLR, femoral tunnel location plays an important role in restoring the intact knee mechanisms, whereas malplacement of the tunnel was cited as the most common cause of knee instability. The objective of this study is to evaluate, objectively, the tibiofemoral contact area and stress after single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with femoral tunnel positions drilled by transtibial (TT) or anteromedial (AM) portal techniques.

Methods

Seven fresh human cadaveric knees underwent ACLR by the use of TT or AM portal techniques in a randomized order. These specimens were reused for ACL-R (TT and AM). The tibiofemoral contact area and stresses were gauged by an electronic stress-sensitive film inserted into the joint space. The knee was under the femoral axial compressive load of 1000 N using a biomechanics testing machine at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° of flexion. Three conditions were compared: (1) intact ACL, (2) ACLR by the use of the TT method, and (3) ACLR by the use of the AM portal method.

Results

Compared with AM portal ACL-reconstructed knees, a significantly decreased tibiofemoral contact area on the medial compartment was detected in the TT ACL-reconstructed knees at 20°of knee flexion (P = .047). Compared with the intact group, the TT ACLR group showed a higher mean stress at 20° and 30° of flexion on the medial compartments (P = .001, P = .003, respectively), while the AM portal ACLR group showed no significant differences at 30° of flexion (P = .073). The TT ACLR group also showed a higher mean maximum stress at 20° of flexion on the medial compartments (P = .047), while the AM portal ACLR group showed no significant differences at this angle(P = .319).

Discussion

The alternation of the tibiofemoral joint contact area and stress in reconstructed knees may be caused by the mismatch of the tibiofemoral joint during knee movement procedures compared with intact knees.

Conclusions

SB ACLR by the use of the AM portal method and TT method both alter the tibiofemoral contact area and stress when compared with the intact knee. When compared with the TT technique, ACLR by the AM portal technique more closely restores the intact tibiofemoral contact area and stress at low flexion angles.

The quadrant method measuring four points is as a reliable and accurate as the quadrant method in the evaluation after anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The quadrant method was described by Bernard et al. and it has been widely used for postoperative evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this research is to further develop the quadrant method measuring four points, which we named four-point quadrant method, and to compare with the quadrant method.

METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) analyses were performed in 25 patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the outside-in technique. The four points in this study's quadrant method were defined as point1-highest, point2-deepest, point3-lowest, and point4-shallowest, in femoral tunnel position. Value of depth and height in each point was measured. Antero-medial (AM) tunnel is (depth1, height2) and postero-lateral (PL) tunnel is (depth3, height4) in this four-point quadrant method. The 3D-CT images were evaluated independently by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. A second measurement was performed by both observers after a 4-week interval. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated by means of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, the accuracy of the method was evaluated against the quadrant method.

RESULTS

Intra-observer reliability was almost perfect for both AM and PL tunnel (ICC > 0.81). Inter-observer reliability of AM tunnel was substantial (ICC > 0.61) and that of PL tunnel was almost perfect (ICC > 0.81). The AM tunnel position was 0.13% deep, 0.58% high and PL tunnel position was 0.01% shallow, 0.13% low compared to quadrant method.

CONCLUSIONS

The four-point quadrant method was found to have high intra- and inter-observer reliability and accuracy. This method can evaluate the tunnel position regardless of the shape and morphology of the bone tunnel aperture for use of comparison and can provide measurement that can be compared with various reconstruction methods. The four-point quadrant method of this study is considered to have clinical relevance in that it is a detailed and accurate tool for evaluating femoral tunnel position after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Macrophage M1 Plays a Positive Role in Aseptic Inflammation-Related Graft Loosening After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

Macrophage-related inflammatory response is one of the main biological factors resulting in failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, although the specific pathomechanism remains to be clarified. Our aim was to investigate the association between graft loosening and macrophage-related inflammation in cases of loosening of reconstructed ACL autografts. Tissue samples were obtained from 21 patients who underwent a second-look arthroscopy within the first year after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using single-bundle hamstring tendon autografts. Possible biological factors of graft loosening were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and hematoxylin/eosin and immunohistochemical staining of graft tissue samples obtained during the second-look arthroscopy. Graft loosening was closely related to increased gene and protein expression of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8) and activation of the inflammation-related toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling (TLR2 and TLR4). The molecular expression of TGF-β and type I and III collagen was also inhibited to varying degrees, with decreased vascularization of the graft due to an inhibition of VEGF. iNOS, a marker of M1 macrophage activation, was highly expressed in cases of graft loosening, with no effect of M2 macrophages identified. The activation of M1 macrophages and aseptic inflammation signaling is an important biological factor of graft loosening after ACL reconstruction, affecting ligamentization and the health of grafts.

No clinical differences between anteromedial portal and transtibial technique for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

The anteromedial (AMP) portal technique was introduced to position the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to more closely replicate the original ACL footprint compared to the transtibial (TT) approach. Few randomized trials have evaluated differences in these techniques with respect to clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are any differences in clinical outcome between the AMP and TT approaches.

METHODS

This is a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to undergo ACL reconstruction using the AMP or TT approach. The primary outcome measure was the ACL quality of life (ACL-QOL), and secondary outcomes were the IKDC knee assessment, side-to-side difference in anterior-posterior knee laxity (KT-1000) and tunnel orientation (X-ray findings) at preoperative, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperative. Statistical comparisons were performed using a series of t tests for independent groups with equal variance.

RESULTS

Ninety-six participants were consented and randomized between 2007 and 2011 with eight excluded postrandomization. Mean (SD) preoperative ACL-QOL was 33 (13) for TT and 36 (17) for AMP and improved significantly (p < 0.001) in both groups to 79 (18) and 78 (18) at 24 months postoperative, respectively. The preoperative median IKDC grade for both groups was C and improved similarly in both groups at 24 months (n.s.). There was no side-to-side difference in knee laxity based on KT-1000 measurements with a mean (SD) 1 (3) mm between affected and unaffected limbs in the TT group compared to 1 (3) mm for the AMP group. A significant difference was found in femoral tunnel orientation with the AMP group at 43° (7) and the TT group 58° (8) in the coronal plane (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

No differences in clinical outcome were found when comparing AMP to TT in primary ACL reconstruction using a STG graft. This prospective randomized controlled trial suggests surgeons can use either method without significantly compromising clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

The posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is a reliable novel landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Femoral tunnel placement is essential for good outcome in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In the past, several attempts have been made to optimize femoral tunnel placement. It was observed that the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus was always located directly below to the desired femoral ACL tunnel position, when the knee was brought to deep flexion (> 120°). The goal of the present study was to verify the hypothesis that the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus can be used as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement.

METHODS

Out of a consecutive series of ACL reconstructions done by a single surgeon, 55 lateral radiographs were evaluated according to the quadrant method by Bernard and Hertel. Additionally, on anterior-posterior radiographs the femoral tunnel angle was determined.

RESULTS

In the present case series the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus could be identified and used as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement in all cases. The mean tunnel depth was 24 ± 5.1% and the mean tunnel height was 31.3 ± 5.7%. The mean femoral tunnel angle was 41 ± 4.9° using the anatomical axis as a reference. Compared to previous cadaver studies the data of the present study were within their anatomical range of the native ACL insertion site.

CONCLUSION

The suggested technique using the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement showed reproducible results and matches the native ACL insertion site compared to previous cadaveric studies. In particular, non-experienced ACL surgeons will benefit from this apparent landmark and the corresponding easy-to-use ACL reconstruction method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Tibial tunnel widening associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstrings: A comparison between antero-medial portal and transtibial techniques

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the enlargement effect of the tibial tunnel emergence of 2 different of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: antero-medial portal (AMP) vs. transtibial (TT) technique.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled study was performed in 36 consecutive patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon grafts employing the AMP and conventional TT techniques. Lateral and antero-posterior radiographs were obtained for each patient at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. The sclerotic margins of the tibial tunnels were measured at the widest dimension of the tunnel as well as the diameter of the tibial emergence and were compared with the initially drilled tunnel size after correction for radiographic magnification. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the 2 groups by use of the independent-samples t test, with significance set at .05.

RESULTS

The mean percentage increase in the diameter of tibial tunnel emergence at 6 weeks after surgery was 8.1%±2.9 for the PAM technique and 21.20%±11.87 for the TT technique on the anteroposterior x-ray view. However, the mean percentage increase in the diameter of the tibial tunnel emergence on the lateral view was 7.1%±4.72 for the medial portal technique and 17.64%±11.48 for the transtibial technique. This difference was statistically significant on both anteroposterior and lateral views.

CONCLUSIONS

The diameter of the tibial tunnel emergence for hamstring autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions was significantly lower for the medial portal technique when compared with the conventional TT technique.

Increased odds of patient-reported success at 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients without cartilage lesions: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the surgical technique of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the visualization of anatomic surgical factors and the presence or absence of concomitant injuries at primary ACL reconstruction are able to predict patient-reported success and failure. The hypothesis of this study was that anatomic single-bundle surgical procedures would be predictive of patient-reported success.

METHODS

This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using an online questionnaire comprising essential anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist items, defined as the utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, the visualization of insertion sites and pertinent landmarks. A univariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender was used to determine predictors of patient-reported success and failure, i.e. 20th and 80th percentile, respectively, in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

In the 6889 included patients, the surgical technique used for single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the predefined patient-reported success or patient-reported failure in the KOOS₄. Patient-reported success was predicted by the absence of concomitant injury to the meniscus (OR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.92], p = 0.001) and articular cartilage (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61-0.81], p < 0.001). Patient-reported failure was predicted by the presence of a concomitant injury to the articular cartilage (OR = 1.27 [95% CI, 1.11-1.44], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical techniques used in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the KOOS 2 years after the reconstruction. However, the absence of concomitant injuries at index surgery predicted patient-reported success in the KOOS. The results provide further evidence that concomitant injuries at ACL reconstruction affect subjective knee function and a detailed knowledge of the treatment of these concomitant injuries is needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Knee Abduction Affects Greater Magnitude of Change in ACL and MCL Strains Than Matched Internal Tibial Rotation In Vitro

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injures incur over USD 2 billion in annual medical costs and prevention has become a topic of interest in biomechanics. However, literature conflicts persist over how knee rotations contribute to ACL strain and ligament injury. To maximize the efficacy of ACL injury prevention, the effects of underlying mechanics need to be better understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We applied robotically controlled, in vivo-derived kinematic stimuli to the knee to assess ligament biomechanics in a cadaver model. We asked: (1) Does the application of abduction rotation increase ACL and medial collateral ligament (MCL) strain relative to the normal condition? (2) Does the application of internal tibial rotation impact ACL strain relative to the neutral condition? (3) Does combined abduction and internal tibial rotation increase ligament strain more than either individual contribution?

METHODS

A six-degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator was used to position 17 cadaveric specimens free from knee pathology outside of low-grade osteoarthritis (age, 47 ± 8 years; 13 males, four females) into orientations that mimic initial contact recorded from in vivo male and female drop vertical jump and sidestep cutting activities. Four-degree rotational perturbations were applied in both directions from the neutral alignment position (creating an 8° range) for each frontal, transverse, and combined planes while ACL and MCL strains were continuously recorded with DVRT strain gauges implanted directly on each ligament. Analysis of variance models with least significant difference post hoc analysis were used to assess differences in ligament strain and joint loading between sex, ligament condition, or motion task and rotation type.

RESULTS

For the female drop vertical jump simulation in the intact knee, isolated abduction and combined abduction/internal rotational stimuli produced the greatest change in strain from the neutral position as compared with all other stimuli within the ACL (1.5% ± 1.0%, p ≤ 0.035; 1.8% ± 1.3%, p ≤ 0.005) and MCL (1.8% ± 1.0%, p < 0.001; 1.6% ± 1.3%, p < 0.001) compared with all other applied stimuli. There were no differences in mean peak ACL strain between any rotational stimuli (largest mean difference = 2.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.9% to 5.0%; p = 0.070). These trends were consistent for all four simulated tasks. Peak ACL strain in the intact knee was larger than peak MCL strain for all applied rotational stimuli in the drop vertical jump simulations (smallest mean difference = 2.1%; 95% CI, -0.4% to 4.5%; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Kinematically constrained cadaveric knee models using peak strain as an outcome variable require greater than 4° rotational perturbations to elicit changes in intraarticular ligaments.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Because combined rotations and isolated abduction produced greater change in strain relative to the neutral position for the ACL and MCL than any other rotational stimuli in this cadaver study, hypotheses for in vivo investigations aimed toward injury prevention that focuses on the reduction of frontal plane knee motion should be considered. Furthermore, reduced strain in the MCL versus the ACL may help explain why only 30% of ACL ruptures exhibit concomitant MCL injuries.

Tunnel malpositions in anterior cruciate ligament risk cartilaginous changes and bucket-handle meniscal tear: Arthroscopic survey in both primary and revision surgery

OBJECTIVES

There are not many chances to arthroscopically reassess how graft tunnel malpositions in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) associate with intra-articular degeneration in revision ACLR. This study was aimed to evaluate whether radiographic tunnel position in primary ACLR affect cartilaginous changes and bucket-handle meniscus tears in revision ACLR.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients who underwent revision ACLR were recruited; their primary surgeries were single-bundle reconstructions. Tunnel positions were evaluated using the plain radiographs after primary surgery. The sagittal tunnel positions of the femur (FP) and tibia (TP) were determined on the lateral view. The articular cartilage was evaluated arthroscopically at primary and revision surgery using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. A progression of two grades was considered as cartilaginous changes. Meniscal tears were evaluated with an arthroscopic probe. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using the prevalence of cartilaginous changes or bucket-handle meniscus tears as the dependent variable; tunnel parameters were used as the independent variables.

RESULTS

Seven patients (20.0%) had cartilaginous changes and nine patients (25.7%) had bucket-handle tears in the medial meniscus. In logistic regression analysis, %FP [odds ratio (OR): 1.212; P = 0.007] and the cut-off of 60% in the FP (OR: 22.000; P = 0.008) were correlated with cartilaginous changes. %TP (OR: 1.126; P = 0.036) was correlated with the prevalence of bucket-handle meniscus tears.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior femoral tunnel malposition in the femur was associated with the cartilaginous changes, and posterior tibial tunnel malposition with the development of bucket-handle meniscus tears.

Femoral tunnel positioning using an anteromedial technique for ACL reconstruction: A radiographic study with a cadaveric model

BACKGROUND

We studied the anatomic positioning of the femoral tunnel during simulated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an anteromedial portal approach in cadaveric models.

METHODS

In thirty cadaveric human knee specimens, simulation of an arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed and the femoral tunnel was drilled using an anteromedial portal. A Kirschner wire was passed into the tunnel and radiographs were obtained. These radiographs were then evaluated in the coronal and sagittal planes. Angles between the axis of the femoral tunnel and the joint line in the coronal plane (alpha, α) or the femoral long axis in the sagittal plane (beta, β) were calculated for each specimen. The external aperture of the femoral tunnel was defined as the point of exit of the Kirschner wire from the lateral femoral cortex. This was evaluated relative to a prescribed rectangle and coordinate axis, with the radiographic quadrant method of Bernard, to assess the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement.

RESULTS

The mean α in the coronal plane was 48.53∘, the mean β in the sagittal plane was 32.23∘. All of the femoral tunnel external apertures were located outside of the rectangleCONCLUSION: We evaluated the positioning of the femoral tunnel and the external aperture of the femoral tunnel with the anteromedial portal technique. This study provides a reference standard to assess accurately femoral tunnel positioning on postoperative radiographs.

Radiographic positions of femoral ACL, AM and PL centres: accuracy of guidelines based on the lateral quadrant method

PURPOSE

Femoral tunnel positioning is an important factor in anatomical ACL reconstructions. To improve accuracy, lateral radiographic support can be used to determine the correct tunnel location, applying the quadrant method. Piefer et al. (Arthroscopy 28:872-881, 2012) combined various outcomes of eight studies applying this method to one guideline. The studies included in that guideline used various insertion margins, imaging techniques and measurement methods to determine the position of the ACL centres. The question we addressed is whether condensing data from various methods into one guideline, results in a more accurate guideline than the results of one study.

METHODS

The accuracy of the Piefer's guideline was determined and compared to a guideline developed by Luites et al. (2000). For both guidelines, we quantified the mean absolute differences in positions of the actual anatomical centres of the ACL, AM and PL measured on the lateral radiographs of twelve femora with the quadrant method and the positions according to the guidelines.

RESULTS

The accuracy of Piefer's guidelines was 2.4 mm (ACL), 2.7 mm (AM) and 4.6 mm (PL), resulting in positions significantly different from the actual anatomical centres. Applying Luites' guidelines for ACL and PL resulted in positions not significantly different from the actual centres. The accuracies were 1.6 mm (ACL) and 2.2 mm (PL and AM), which were significantly different from Piefer for the PL centres, and therefore more accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

Condensing the outcomes of multiple studies using various insertion margins, imaging techniques and measurement methods, results in inaccurate guidelines for femoral ACL tunnel positioning at the lateral view.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An accurate femoral tunnel positioning for anatomical ACL reconstruction is a key issue. The results of this study demonstrate that averaging of various radiographic guidelines for anatomical femoral ACL tunnel placement in daily practice, can result in inaccurate tunnel positions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level 1.

Effects of ACL graft placement on in vivo knee function and cartilage thickness distributions

Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) frequently lead to early-onset osteoarthritis. Despite advancement in surgical techniques, ACL reconstruction has a limited ability to prevent these degenerative changes. While previous studies have investigated knee function after ACL reconstruction, in vivo investigations of the effects of graft placement on in vivo joint function and cartilage health are limited. This review presents a series of studies that used novel imaging and 3D modeling techniques to determine the in vivo placement of the ACL graft on the femur using two different ACL reconstruction techniques. These techniques resulted in two distinct graft placement groups: one where the ACL was placed anatomically near the center of the native ACL footprint and another where the graft was placed anteroproximally on the femur, centered outside the ACL footprint. We quantified the effects of graft placement on graft deformation during in vivo loading and how these variables affected knee motion. Finally, we quantified whether femoral placement of the graft affected cartilage thickness. Our results demonstrate that achieving anatomic graft placement on the femur is critical to restoring native ACL function and normal knee kinematics. Knees with grafts that more closely restored normal ACL function, and thus knee motion, experienced less focal cartilage thinning than did those that experienced abnormal knee motion. These results suggest that achieving anatomic graft placement is a critical factor in restoring normal knee motion and potentially slowing the development of degenerative changes after ACL reconstruction. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1160-1170, 2017.

In-out versus out-in technique for ACL reconstruction: a prospective clinical and radiological comparison

Background

Several studies have recently shown better restoration of normal knee kinematics and improvement of rotator knee stability after reconstruction with higher femoral tunnel obliquity. The aim of this study is to evaluate tunnel obliquity, length, and posterior wall blowout in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the transtibial (TT) technique and the out–in (OI) technique.

Materials and methods

Forty consecutive patients operated on for ACL reconstruction with hamstrings were randomly divided into two groups: group A underwent a TT technique, while group B underwent an OI technique. At mean follow-up of 10 months, clinical results and obliquity, length, and posterior wall blowout of femoral tunnels in sagittal and coronal planes using computed tomography (CT) scan were assessed.

Results

In sagittal plane, femoral tunnel obliquity was 38.6 ± 10.2° in group A and 36.6 ± 11.8° in group B (p = 0.63). In coronal plane, femoral tunnel obliquity was 57.8 ± 5.8° in group A and 35.8 ± 8.2° in group B (p = 0.009). Mean tunnel length was 40.3 ± 1.2 mm in group A and 32.9 ± 2.3 mm in group B (p = 0.01). No cases of posterior wall compromise were observed in any patient of either group. Clinical results were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

The OI technique provides greater obliquity of the femoral tunnel in coronal plane, along with satisfactory length of the tunnel and lack of posterior wall compromise.

Level of evidence

II, prospective study.

Comparison of Anteromedial and Transtibial ACL Reconstruction Using Expandable Fixation

The influence of anatomical or nonanatomical femoral tunnel position on tunnel widening and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is not fully understood. This retrospective study examined the influence of tunnel width and placement on anterior knee stability and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction using the AperFix System (Cayenne Medical Inc, Scottsdale, Arizona), a direct expandable fixation technique with autologous hamstring grafts. The records of 80 patients (79 men and 1 woman) who underwent ACL reconstruction were evaluated. In 38 patients, anatomical femoral tunnel placement was performed via an accessory medial portal (anteromedial group); in the remaining 42 patients, the femoral tunnel was positioned nonanatomically using a transtibial technique (transtibial group). Mean follow-up was 40.7 months (range, 27-60 months). Postoperative knee kinetics were measured, and clinical outcomes were assessed using International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. Femoral tunnel widening was measured by comparing postoperative radiographs with final follow-up radiographs. Femoral tunnel width was significantly greater (P<.001) and anterior knee translation was significantly higher (P=.01) in the transtibial group. Lysholm and Tegner scores were not significantly different (P>.05) between the 2 groups. These findings suggest that femoral tunnel widening is associated with increased anterior joint laxity when a direct fixation technique is used for ACL reconstruction, particularly in nonanatomically positioned femoral tunnels. Anatomical femoral tunnel placement provides better anterior stability and less tunnel widening than transtibial tunnel placement; however, these benefits did not produce a detectable advantage in clinical outcomes measures. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e532-e537.].

Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position

PURPOSE

During anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, authors have suggested inserting the femoral tunnel at the biomechanically relevant direct fibres, but this higher position can cause more impingement. Therefore, we aimed to assess ACL graft impingement at the femoral notch for ACL reconstruction at both the direct and indirect tunnel positions.

METHODS

A virtual model was created for twelve cadaveric knees with computed tomography scanning in which a virtual graft was placed at direct and indirect tunnel positions of the anteromedial bundle (AM), posterolateral bundle (PL) or centre of the both bundles (C). In these six tunnel positions, the volume (mm³) and mid-point location of impingement (°) were measured at different flexion angles.

RESULTS

Generally, more impingement was seen with the indirect position compared with the direct position although this was only significant at 90° of flexion for the AM position (97 ± 28 vs. 76 ± 20 mm³, respectively; p = 0.046). The direct tunnel position impinged higher at the notch, whereas the indirect position impinged more towards the lateral wall, but this was only significant at 90° of flexion for the AM (24 ± 5° vs. 34 ± 4°, respectively; p < 0.001) and C position (34 ± 5° vs. 42 ± 5°, respectively; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric study, the direct tunnel position did not cause more impingement than the indirect tunnel position. Based on these results, graft impingement is not a limitation to reconstruct the femoral tunnel at the insertion of the biomechanically more relevant direct fibres.

Three-Dimensional CT Evaluation of Tunnel Positioning in ACL Reconstruction Using the Single Anteromedial Bundle Biological Augmentation (SAMBBA) Technique

BACKGROUND

Remnant preservation may confer important advantages in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knee. However, the presence of a large remnant may obscure visualization and impair the ability to correctly place tunnels during surgery.

PURPOSE

To determine whether tunnel placement during anatomic ACL reconstruction using the single anteromedial bundle biological augmentation (SAMBBA) technique is consistent and precise when a large native remnant is preserved.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Included in this study were 99 patients undergoing an ACL reconstruction during which at least 50% of the native ACL was preserved. The femoral tunnel was created using an outside-in specific guide. The tibial tunnel was positioned in the anteromedial region of the ACL footprint, and the remnant was carefully preserved while drilling and passing the semitendinosus graft through it. Postoperatively, 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) was used to evaluate tunnel placement. The mean tunnel locations were calculated and the standard deviation was used to evaluate precision of positioning. Inter- and intrareader agreement were determined to assess reliability of evaluation of tunnel position.

RESULTS

The center of the femoral tunnel was positioned at a mean 19.4% (SD, 2%) of the depth of the notch and a mean 23.1% (SD, 3.5%) of the lateral wall height. The center of the tibial tunnel was positioned at a mean 36.3% (SD, 3.8%) of the anteroposterior length of the tibial plateau and at a mean 47.0% (SD, 2.7%) of the mediolateral width. The small standard deviations demonstrate that this technique allows precise tunnel placement. The tunnel positions achieved were consistent with previous anatomic studies of femoral and tibial anteromedial bundle insertion. Intra- and interobserver reliability were high.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional CT evaluation demonstrated that despite the presence of a large remnant, placement of femoral and tibial tunnels for anatomic ACL reconstruction using the SAMBBA technique is consistent and precise.

Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to define the normal ACL central tibial footprint position and describe a standardised technique of measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

The central position of the ACL tibial attachment site was determined on 76 MRI scans of young individuals. The central footprint position was referenced in the anterior-posterior (A-P) and medial-lateral (M-L) planes on a grid system over the widest portion of the proximal tibia. 3D CT images of 26 young individuals had a simulated tibial tunnel centred within the bony landmarks of the ACL footprint, and the same grid system was applied over the widest portion of the proximal tibia. The MRI central footprint position was compared to the 3D CT central footprint position to validate the technique and results.

RESULTS

The median age of the 76 MRI subjects was 24 years, with 32 females and 44 males. The ACL central footprint position was at 39 (±3 %) and 48 (±2 %), in the A-P and M-L planes, respectively. There was no significant difference in this position between sexes. The median age of the 26 CT subjects was 25.5 years, with 10 females and 16 males. The central position of the bony ACL footprint was at 38 (±2 %) and 48 (±2 %), in the A-P and M-L planes, respectively. The MRI and CT central footprint positions were not significantly different in relation to the medial position, but were different in relation to the anterior position (A-P 39 % vs. 38 %, p = 0.01). The absolute difference between the central MRI and CT reference positions was 0.45 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACL's normal central tibial footprint reference position has been defined, and the technique of measuring tibial tunnel location with a standardised grid system is described. This study will assist surgeons in evaluating tibial tunnel position in anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Characteristics of elongated and ruptured anterior cruciate ligament grafts: An analysis of 21 consecutive revision cases

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions often fail without graft rupture. The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of patients with elongated and ruptured bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts that required revision surgery.

METHODS

Twenty one patients who required revisions of a BTB-reconstructed ACL between 2010 and 2015 were enrolled in this study. All patients were evaluated for bone tunnel position using computed tomography. Tunnel angle was calculated with radiographs. Stability under anaesthesia, and meniscus and cartilage condition were evaluated during the revision surgery. Age at primary surgery, time between primary and revision surgery, activity level, original tunnel position of the graft, and meniscus and cartilage condition were compared between elongated and ruptured grafts.

RESULTS

Age at primary surgery was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.528). Time between primary and revision surgery as well as activity level were also not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.010 and p = 0.307, respectively). Femoral bone tunnel position was more proximal (p = 0.003), and radiographic tunnel angle was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.029). The rupture group was significantly more unstable on the pivot shift (p < 0.003). Meniscus degeneration, meniscus tear, and cartilage damage were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.030, p = 0.311, and p = 0.505, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The location of the original femoral tunnel was more proximal in patients with elongated grafts than in those with ruptured grafts. Different bone tunnel position from native ACL might lead to graft elongation.