Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients

Qualitative and quantitative return-to-sport test battery and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factors

ABSTRACT

Objective

To determine risk factors for second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury following primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using return-to-sport (RTS) tests consisting of qualitative and quantitative measures in young athletes.

Methods

A case-control study design was used, and a retrospective review of adolescent athletes after primary ACLR was performed. All athletes completed an RTS test consisting of qualitative and quantitative assessments and psychological assessments with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Athlete demographics, surgical characteristics and sports participation were also examined. A binary logistic regression was performed to verify an independent association between risk factors and second ACL injury using adjusted OR (aORs), 95% CI and p<0.05.

Results

In 72 eligible athletes, 12 (16.7%) suffered a second ACL injury. The mean Tegner activity level was 8.4+1.1, and the mean time from ACLR to RTS test completion was 10.4+2.9 months. One variable that showed the lowest p-value in the preliminary analysis was entered into the binary logistic regression model, which resulted in that qualitative assessment of knee valgus during the sidestep cut was associated with second ACL injury (aOR=4.64, 95% CI: 1.18 to 18.23, p=0.03).

Conclusion

Athletes who demonstrated excessive dynamic knee valgus on the involved limb during the sidestep cut were approximately 4.6 times more likely to suffer a second ACL injury.

Patient and Operative Risk Factors for Osteoarthritis After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 41,976 Patients

BACKGROUND

The reported incidence of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) varies considerably. Further, there are gaps in identifying which patients are at risk for PTOA after ACLR and whether there are modifiable factors.

PURPOSE

To (1) determine the incidence of PTOA in a primary ACLR cohort and (2) identify patient and perioperative factors associated with the development of PTOA after primary ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry were used to conduct a cohort study. Patients who had undergone primary ACLR without a previous diagnosis of osteoarthritis were identified (2009-2020). The crude incidence of PTOA was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with a multistate model. The association of patient and operative factors with the development of PTOA after primary ACLR was modeled as a time to event using multistate Cox proportional hazards regression. Models stratified by age (<22 and ≥22 years) were also conducted because of the effect modification of age.

RESULTS

The study sample included 41,976 cases of primary ACLR. The incidence of PTOA was 1.7%, 5.1%, and 13.6% at 2, 5, and 10 year follow-ups, respectively. Risk factors for PTOA that were consistently identified in the overall cohort and age-stratified groups included a body mass index ≥30 versus <30 and an allograft or quadriceps tendon autograft versus a hamstring tendon autograft. Patients presenting with knee pain after ACLR were further identified when considering postoperative factors. Other risk factors for PTOA in the overall cohort included age ≥22 versus <22 years, bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft, hypertension, cartilage injury, meniscal injury, revision after primary ACLR with concomitant meniscal/cartilage surgery, multiligament injury, other activity at the time of injury compared with sport, and tibial tunnel drilling technique rather than the anteromedial portal.

CONCLUSION

Knee pain after ACLR may be an early sign of PTOA. Surgeons should consider the adverse associations of a higher body mass index and an allograft or quadriceps tendon autograft with the development of PTOA, as these were factors identified with a higher risk, regardless of a patient's age at the time of primary ACLR.

A Comparative Analysis of Quadriceps Tendon, Patellar Tendon Bone Allograft, and Cadaver Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair and Reconstructive Surgery

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a common occurrence among athletes and active individuals, often necessitating surgical intervention for optimal recovery. The choice of graft material for ACL reconstruction remains a topic of debate, with various options available, including quadriceps tendon (QT), patellar tendon bone allograft (PTBA), and cadaver graft (CG). This paper aims to provide an extensive review and comparison of the efficacy, outcomes, and complications associated with these graft types based on recent research. A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify relevant studies published in the past six years. The findings suggest that while each graft type has its advantages and limitations, there is no definitive superior choice. Factors such as patient age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgeon preference should be considered when selecting the most appropriate graft for ACL repair surgery. QT grafts are associated with lower donor-site morbidity compared to patellar tendon grafts. However, QT grafts may have a higher risk of graft rupture and decreased knee flexion strength. PTBA grafts, compared to QT grafts, have a higher risk of donor-site morbidity but a lower risk of graft rupture and improved knee stability. CG grafts have lower donor-site morbidity compared to PTBA grafts but may have a higher risk of graft rupture and decreased knee flexion strength compared to PTBA grafts. In conclusion, the choice of graft material for ACL reconstruction is a complex decision that requires careful consideration of various factors, including patient age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgeon preference. While each graft type has its advantages and limitations, there is no definitive superior choice. Therefore, it is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of each graft type to ensure optimal outcomes for patients undergoing ACL repair surgery.

Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft Provides Excellent Clinical Outcomes, High Rates of Return to Play, and a Low Incidence of Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review evaluating clinical outcomes in patients undergoing medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (MUCLR) with soft-tissue allograft.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcomes evaluated were patient-reported outcome scores, return to play (RTP) rates, incidence of postoperative complications, and rates of graft rupture or mechanical failure.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 395 articles, and 5 studies met final inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 274 patients were analyzed in the included studies and follow-up ranged from 3.0 to 7.6 years. Two studies (number of patients = 141) reported outcomes exclusively of MUCLR with allograft, whereas 3 studies (number of patients = 133) reported outcomes in patients undergoing MUCLR with either allograft or autograft. Allograft sources included gracilis, semitendinosus, plantaris, peroneus longus, and palmaris longus. Level of patient athletic competition ranged from recreational athletes to the professional level; however, nonathletes in the setting of trauma were also included. The RTP rate after MUCLR with soft-tissue allograft was 95.3%, and 89.3% of patients returned to a similar or greater level of play postoperatively. The Timmerman-Andrews score was reported in 2 studies, and the means postoperatively ranged from 94.55 to 97. Postoperative complication rates were low (range, 0% to 20%), and there were no reported incidences of allograft rupture or mechanical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available data, soft-tissue allograft for MUCLR in athletic patient populations provides excellent clinical outcomes, high rates of RTP, and low rates of postoperative complications and graft failure at short-term follow-up. There remains a lack of high-quality evidence directly comparing autograft versus allograft outcomes in elite overhead-throwing athletes to support allograft as an acceptable alternative for MUCLR in this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

Evaluation of Failed ACL Reconstruction: An Updated Review

Failure rates among primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) range from 3.2% to 11.1%. Recently, there has been increased focus on surgical and anatomic considerations which predispose patients to failure, including excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS), unaddressed high-grade pivot shift, and improper tunnel placement. The purpose of this review was to provide a current summary and analysis of the literature regarding patient-related and technical factors surrounding revision ACLR, rehabilitation considerations, overall outcomes and return to sport (RTS) for patients who undergo revision ACLR. There is a convincingly higher re-tear and revision rate in patients who undergo ACLR with allograft than autograft, especially amongst the young, athletic population. Unrecognized Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PLC) injury is a common cause of ACLR failure and current literature suggests concurrent operative management of high-grade PLC injuries. Given the high rates of revision surgery in young active patients who return to pivoting sports, the authors recommend strong consideration of a combined ACLR + Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) or Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure in this population. Excessive PTS has been identified as an independent risk factor for ACL graft failure. Careful consideration of patient-specific factors such as age and activity level may influence the success of ACL reconstruction. Additional technical considerations including graft choice and fixation method, tunnel position, evaluation of concomitant posterolateral corner and high-grade pivot shift injuries, and the role of excessive posterior tibial slope may play a significant role in preventing failure.

Satisfactory 5-year functional outcomes following primary ACL reconstructions from the UK National Ligament Registry

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe the 10-year findings from the UK National Ligament Registry (NLR).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for prospectively collected data on the NLR between January 2013 and December 2022. All patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) on the registry were included. Surgical characteristics were analysed, including surgeon grade and case volume, concomitant knee procedures, venous thromboembolic prophylaxis, graft characteristics, femoral and tibial tunnel drilling, and fixation methods. Clinical outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years following the index procedure.

RESULTS

During the study period, 17,492 unilateral ACLR procedures were recorded. Autograft was used in 98%, most commonly a combined semitendinosus and gracilis graft (77%) or patella tendon graft (31%). Allograft was used in only 1% of the patients. In 52% of cases, ACLR was associated with an additional procedure, with isolated medial meniscal surgery being the most common (21%). Femoral tunnel drilling was mostly performed through an anteromedial portal (73%) and tibial tunnel drilling using an outside-in technique (92%). The most common method of femoral graft fixation was with an Endobutton fixed loop suspensory device (77%), while interference screws predominated for tibial tunnel fixation (86%). Patients who underwent ACLR surgery showed significant improvement in their functional outcome scores at six months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Data from the NLR shows a detailed description of the current trends and evolution of ACLR in the United Kingdom over the last 10 years. Satisfactory functional outcomes were observed 5 years postoperatively. This study provides useful information on the prevalence of ACL-associated injuries and current surgical techniques with the aim of improving the quality of clinical care and patients' outcomes. Moreover, it provides surgeons with a benchmark against which to compare current practices and functional outcomes following ACLR across the United Kingdom.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft, the Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain Ranges From 5.4% to 48.4% and the Incidence of Kneeling Pain Ranges From 4.0% to 75.6%: A Systematic Review of Level I Studies

Purpose

To (1) perform a systematic review of level I randomized controlled trials (RCTs) detailing the incidence of anterior knee pain and kneeling pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft and (2) investigate the effect of bone grafting the patellar harvest site on anterior knee and kneeling pain.

Methods

A systematic review of level I studies from 1980 to 2023 was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome evaluated was the presence of donor site morbidity in the form of anterior knee pain or kneeling pain. A secondary subanalysis was performed to assess for differences in the incidence of postoperative pain between patient groups undergoing ACLR with BPTB receiving harvest site bone grafting and those in whom the defect was left untreated.

Results

Following full-text review, 15 studies reporting on a total of 696 patients met final inclusion criteria. Patients were followed for an average of 4.78 years (range, 2.0-15.3), and the mean age ranged from 21.7 to 38 years old. The incidence of anterior knee pain, calculated from 354 patients across 10 studies, ranged from 5.4% to 48.4%. The incidence of postoperative pain with kneeling was determined to range from 4.0% to 75.6% in 490 patients from 9 studies. Patients treated with bone grafting of the BPTB harvest site had no significant difference in incidence of any knee pain compared with those who were not grafted, with incidences of 43.3% and 40.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

Based on the current level I RCT data, the incidences of anterior knee pain and kneeling pain following ACLR with BPTB autograft range from 5.4% to 48.4% and 4.0% to 75.6%, respectively.

Level of Evidence

Level I, systematic review of RCTs.

Autograft Demonstrates Superior Outcomes for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction When Compared With Allograft: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have compared outcomes among patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with autograft versus allograft, but these data are inconsistently reported and long-term outcomes depending on graft type are yet to be determined.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes after revision ACLR (rACLR) with autograft versus allograft.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that compared the outcomes of patients undergoing rACLR with autograft versus allograft. The search phrase used was autograft allograft revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Graft rerupture rates, return-to-sports rates, anteroposterior laxity, and patient-reported outcome scores (subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner, Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, including 3011 patients undergoing rACLR with autograft (mean age, 28.9 years) and 1238 patients undergoing rACLR with allograft (mean age, 28.0 years). Mean follow-up was 57.3 months. The most common autograft and allograft types were bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts. Overall, 6.2% of patients undergoing rACLR experienced graft retear, including 4.7% in the autograft group and 10.2% in the allograft group (P < .0001). Among studies that reported return-to-sports rates, 66.2% of patients with an autograft returned to sports as opposed to 45.3% of patients with an allograft (P = .01). Two studies found significantly greater postoperative knee laxity in the allograft group as compared with the autograft group (P < .05). Among all patient-reported outcomes, 1 study found 1 significant difference between groups: patients with an autograft had a significantly higher postoperative Lysholm score when compared with patients with an allograft.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing revision ACLR with an autograft can be expected to experience lower rates of graft retear, higher rates of return to sports, and less postoperative anteroposterior knee laxity when compared with patients undergoing revision ACLR with an allograft.

Revision Rates After Primary Allograft ACL Reconstruction by Allograft Tissue Type in Older Patients

Background

While there is extensive literature on the use of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there is limited clinical evidence to guide the surgeon in choice of allograft tissue type.

Purpose

To assess the revision rate after primary ACL reconstruction with allograft and to compare revision rates based on allograft tissue type and characteristics.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Patients who underwent primary allograft ACL reconstructions at a single academic institution between 2015 and 2019 and who had minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were missing surgical or allograft tissue type data. Demographics, operative details, and subsequent surgical procedures were collected. Allograft details included graft tissue type (Achilles, bone-patellar tendon-bone [BTB], tibialis anterior or posterior, semitendinosus, unspecified soft tissue), allograft category (all-soft tissue vs bone block), donor age, irradiation duration and intensity, and chemical cleansing process. Revision rates were calculated and compared by allograft characteristics.

Results

Included were 418 patients (age, 39 ± 12 years; body mass index, 30 ± 9 kg/m2). The revision rate was 3% (11/418) at a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 1.4 years. There were no differences in revision rate according to allograft tissue type across Achilles tendon (3%; 3/95), BTB (5%; 3/58), tibialis anterior or posterior (3%; 5/162), semitendinosus (0%; 0/46), or unspecified soft tissue (0%; 0/57) (P = .35). There was no difference in revision rate between all-soft tissue versus bone block allograft (6/283 [2%] vs 5/135 [4%], respectively; P = .34). Of the 51% of grafts with irradiation data, all grafts were irradiated, with levels varying from 1.5 to 2.7 Mrad and 82% of grafts having levels of <2.0 Mrad. There was no difference in revision rate between the low-dose and medium-to high-dose irradiation cohorts (4% vs 6%, respectively; P = .64).

Conclusion

Similarly low (0%-6%) revision rates after primary ACL reconstruction were seen regardless of allograft tissue type, bone block versus all-soft tissue allograft, and sterilization technique in 418 patients with mean age of 39 years. Surgeons may consider appropriately processed allograft tissue with or without bone block when indicating ACL reconstruction in older patients.

Contralateral grafts have comparable efficacy to ipsilateral grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either contralateral or ipsilateral tendon autografts.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature published from inception to December 9, 2022, in multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews) guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, performed the risk of bias assessment and assessed the study quality. At least one of the following outcomes was evaluated for each study: muscle strength (isometric strength of the quadriceps or hamstring muscles, isokinetic peak flexion torque of the hamstring, or isokinetic peak extension torque of the hamstring), knee laxity examination, Lysholm score, pivot shift, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lachman test result, return to sports time, or incidence of complications. A random effects model was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Four hundred scientific manuscripts were recovered in the initial search. After screening, 12 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 9 cohort studies, and 1 case- control study) met the search criteria for the qualitative analysis. Among them, 9 cohort studies were used for the quantitative analysis. The results showed few statistically significant differences in terms of muscle strength (contralateral group versus ipsilateral group or donor site group versus ipsilateral group or donor site group versus nonoperative group), Lysholm score, and return to sports time. A comparison showed no significant differences in knee laxity, IKDC score, Tegner activity score, Lachman test score, or incidence of complication, or contralateral rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the contralateral autologous tendon has a similar effect as the ipsilateral autologous tendon.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Play: Where Are We Now?

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure, and it is crucial to assess an athlete's readiness to safely return to sports following ACLR to minimize the risk of reinjury. Despite this, determining optimal return to play (RTP) criteria following ACLR that is accurate, accessible, and reproducible remains challenging. This review aims to discuss commonly employed RTP criteria domains, including functional assessments, patient-reported outcomes, and psychological tests, as well as emerging technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that may play a role as a gold standard in RTP assessment. The findings of this review suggest RTP decision making after ACL surgery is nuanced and traditionally used objective measures do not perfectly predict RTS rates or clinical outcomes. In the future, a standardized MRI screening tool could help predict reinjury. The role of functional and psychological patient-reported outcome measures needs to defined, and objective criteria should be rigorously evaluated for whether they accurately screen an athlete's physical readiness and should be expanded to include more sport-specific movement analysis.

Low-Volume Surgeons Use Allograft in Younger Patients and Show Greater Rates of Revision Following Primary Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared With High-Volume Surgeons

Purpose

To determine whether surgeon volume affects revision rate following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with allograft and to determine whether surgeon volume impacts allograft tissue type used.

Methods

All patients aged 14 years or older who underwent primary allograft ACLR at a large hospital system between January 2015 to December 2019 with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with double-bundle ACLR, multiligament reconstruction, and absent allograft type data were excluded. Surgeon volume was categorized as 35 or more ACLR/year for high-volume surgeons and less than 35 ACLR/year for low-volume surgeons. Revision was defined as subsequent ipsilateral ACLR. Patient characteristics, operative details, allograft type, and revision ACLR rates were retrospectively collected. Revision rate and allograft type were analyzed based on surgeon volume.

Results

A total of 457 primary allograft ACLR cases (mean age: 38.8 ± 12.3 years) were included. Low-volume surgeons experienced greater revision rates (10% vs 5%, P = .04) and used allograft in a younger population (37.6 vs 40.0 years old, P = .03) than high-volume surgeons. Subgroup analysis of the total cohort identified a significantly increased failure rate in patients <25 years old compared with ≥25 years old (30% vs 4%, P < .001). Allograft type selection varied significantly between surgeon volume groups, with low-volume surgeons using more bone-patellar tendon-bone (P < .001) and less semitendinosus allograft (P = .01) than high-volume surgeons. No differences in revision rate were observed based on allograft type (P = .71).

Conclusions

There was a greater revision rate following primary allograft ACLR among low-volume surgeons compared with high-volume surgeons. Low-volume surgeons also used allograft in a younger population than did high-volume surgeons.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Influence of Graft Type on Lower Extremity Functional Test Performance and Failure Rate After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Both autografts and allografts are used to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after injury; however, it is unclear whether graft source affects lower extremity functional test performance or failure rate in an active military population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare lower extremity functional test performance and graft failure rates between ACL grafts [allograft, hamstring, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB)].

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

METHODS

Ninety-eight cadets entering a US Service Academy with a history of unilateral ACL reconstruction (ACLR) agreed to participate. Before basic training, participants completed 4 lower extremity functional tests. Active injury surveillance was conducted within the study cohort to identify all subsequent graft failures.

RESULTS

Cadets with hamstring autografts outperformed the BTB and allograft groups on the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test-Posteromedial direction and single-leg hop test, respectively. No differences were detected by graft type for the other functional tests. The incidence of subsequent ipsilateral graft failures in patients with autograft was 8.11%. No failures were observed in the allograft group during the follow-up period. After controlling for sex, joint hypermobility, and time since injury and surgery, the risk of graft failure was 9.8 times higher for patients with a hamstring autograft than with a BTB (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

After ACLR, graft type appears to influence some single-limb measures of lower extremity function and the risk of subsequent failure. Hamstring autografts demonstrated better functional performance but increased risk of graft failure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons need to weigh the pros and cons of all graft options in relation to the patient's lifestyle. Regardless of graft type, individuals with an ACLR may require additional rehabilitation to regain neuromuscular control during dynamic single-limb tasks and mitigate graft failure.

Evaluation of Serum Albumin-Coated Bone Allograft for Bone Regeneration: A Seven-Year Follow-Up Study of 26 Cases

We have previously reported that serum albumin-coated bone allograft (BoneAlbumin, BA) is an effective bone substitute. It improves bone regeneration at the patellar and tibial donor sites six months after harvesting bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). In the present study, we examined these donor sites seven years after implantation. The study group (N = 10) received BA-enhanced autologous cancellous bone at the tibial and BA alone at the patellar site. The control group (N = 16) received autologous cancellous bone at the tibial and blood clot at the patellar site. We evaluated subcortical density, cortical thickness, and bone defect volume via CT scans. At the patellar site, subcortical density was significantly higher in the BA group at both time points. There was no significant difference in cortical thickness between the two groups at either donor site. The control group's bone defect significantly improved and reached the BA group's values at both sites by year seven. Meanwhile, the bone defects in the BA group did not change significantly and were comparable to the six-month measurements. No complications were observed. There are two limitations in this study: The number of patients recruited is small, and the randomization of the patients could have improved the quality of the study as the control group patients were older compared to the study group patients. Our 7-year results seem to demonstrate that BA is a safe and effective bone substitute that supports faster regeneration of donor sites and results in good-quality bone tissue at the time of ACLR with BPTB autografts. However, studies with a larger number of patients are required to definitively confirm the preliminary results of our study.

Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part II: In-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications

Postoperative patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is influenced mainly by the degree of pain, the need for reoperation, and functional performance in daily activities and sports. Graft choice has shown to have an influence on postoperative outcomes after ACL-R. While patient reported outcomes measurements do not differ between graft options, evidence shows that normal knee kinematics is not fully restored after ACL-R with an increase in postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT). Postoperative graft rupture rates seem to favor bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts over HT or allografts. While return to sports rates seem comparable between different graft types, postoperative extensor strength is reduced in patients with BPTB and QT whereas flexion strength is weakened in patients with HT. Postoperative donor site morbidity is highest in BPTB but comparable between HT and QT. With all graft options having advantages and drawbacks, graft choice must be individualized and chosen in accordance with the patient.

Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Single-Bundle Round or Ribbon-like Hamstring Tendon Graft

BACKGROUND

Persistent instability of the knee is reported in up to 30% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Based on anatomic findings showing that ACL is a flat ribbon-like structure that twists during knee flexion, a new surgical ACL reconstruction technique using a ribbon-like graft has been developed. However the effect of this surgical technique on knee kinematics has not yet been evaluated.

PURPOSE

To compare the anteroposterior and rotational stability of the knee after ACL reconstruction using single-bundle (SB) round and ribbon-like grafts in anterolateral-intact/deficient knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve human fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system. Internal rotation and anterior translation of the knee were recorded from 0° to 90° of flexion. A full kinematic assessment was performed in each of the following conditions: (1) intact knee, (2) after sectioning of the ACL, (3) after ACL reconstruction using a SB hamstring tendon graft in a round configuration and a ribbon-like configuration, and (4) after sectioning of the anterolateral structures. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

When compared with the intact knee, the ACL-deficient knee demonstrated a mean ± SD increase in anterior translation and internal rotation of 6.3 ± 2.5 mm (P < .01) and 5.8°± 2.3° (P < .01), respectively. After ACL reconstruction using a SB ribbon-like graft, the mean difference in anterior translation and internal rotation as compared with the intact knee was -0.1 ± 1.5 mm (P = .842) and 0.0°± 1.1° (P = .999). These differences from the intact knee were also not significant after ACL reconstruction using a round graft (-0.1 ± 1.3 mm, P = .999; -0.5°± 1.5°, P = .401). In the ACL-reconstructed knee using either a ribbon-like or round graft, sectioning of the anterolateral structures did not induce a significant increase of anterior translation and internal rotation of the knee.

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction using a SB ribbon-like or round graft restored the kinematics of the intact knee at time zero. Secondary sectioning of the anterolateral structures in the ACL-reconstructed knee using both types of graft did not significantly affect the anterior translation and internal rotation of the knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first biomechanical study on the new ACL reconstruction technique using a ribbon-like graft.

An Interrupted Time Series Analysis Measuring the Impact of Research and Education on Clinical Practice: Decreasing Allograft Use in Young Patients Using a Registry to Track Outcomes

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate whether allograft utilization for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) within our health-care system changed following the implementation of an allograft reduction intervention and whether revision rates within the health-care system changed following the initiation of the intervention.

METHODS

We conducted an interrupted time series study using data from Kaiser Permanente's ACL Reconstruction Registry. In our study, we identified 11,808 patients who were ≤21 years of age and underwent primary ACLR from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2017. The pre-intervention period (15 quarters) was January 1, 2007, through September 30, 2010, and the post-intervention period (29 quarters) was October 1, 2010, through December 31, 2017. Poisson regression was used to evaluate trends over time in 2-year revision rates according to the quarter in which the primary ACLR was performed.

RESULTS

Allograft utilization increased pre-intervention from 21.0% in 2007 Q1 to 24.8% in 2010 Q3. Utilization decreased post-intervention from 29.7% in 2010 Q4 to 2.4% in 2017 Q4. The quarterly 2-year revision rate increased from 3.0 to 7.4 revisions per 100 ACLRs pre-intervention and decreased to 4.1 revisions per 100 ACLRs by the end of the post-intervention period. Poisson regression found an increasing 2-year revision rate over time pre-intervention (rate ratio [RR], 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00 to 1.06] per quarter) and a decreasing rate over time post-intervention (RR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92 to 0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

In our health-care system, we saw a decrease in allograft utilization following the implementation of an allograft reduction program. During the same period, a decrease in the ACLR revision rate was observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Discrete Choice Experiment Examining Graft Preference

Background

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring autografts are the most common grafts used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Patient preferences should be accounted for as a part of shared decision making.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to perform a discrete choice experiment that evaluated patient preferences toward ACL autografts. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient preferences between groups.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Patients aged 18 to 25 years who underwent shoulder arthroscopy at a single institution between 2013 and 2019 were included in the study as a proxy for healthy controls. Patients with a history of ACL tear were excluded. A discrete choice experiment was developed from a literature search and used the following data points as they pertain to BTB or hamstring autograft: risk of developing a significant complication, return-to-play rate, risk of anterior knee pain with kneeling, and risk of additional surgery due to graft failure. Included patients completed a custom survey in which they were asked to choose between "surgery A" (hamstring) and "surgery B" (BTB).

Results

A total of 107 participants were included in the analysis. Of these participants, 39 (36.5%) chose surgery A (hamstring) and 68 (63.6%) chose surgery B (BTB). When comparing the hamstring group with the BTB group, there was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, race, level of education, or employment status. However, 80.5% of self-reported athletes preferred BTB (P = .008). When controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, patients in the BTB group were more likely to rate return to sport (risk ratio [RR] = 1.49 [95% CI, 1.18-1.98]; P = .001) and the risk of requiring additional surgery due to graft failure (RR = 1.26 [95% CI, 1.02-1.58]; P = .037) as highly important. Conversely, they were less likely than patients in the hamstring group to rate pain while kneeling (RR = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.98-1.05]; P < .001) and complication risk (RR = 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.94]; P = .013) as important.

Conclusion

The study hypothesis was rejected, as patient values did affect ACL graft choice preference. Utilizing patient-selected values in a quantifiable way can benefit the shared decision-making process before ACL reconstruction.

The Association Between Bone Bruises and Concomitant Ligaments Injuries in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Bone bruises and concomitant ligament injuries after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have attracted attention, but their correlation and potential clinical significance remain unclear.

Purpose

To assess the relationship between bone bruises and concomitant ligamentous injuries in ACL injuries.

Study design

Systematic review.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was completed from inception to October 20, 2021. All articles that evaluated the relationship between bone bruises and related ligaments injuries were included. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment as well as Review Manager 5.3 was used for data analysis.

Results

A total of 19 studies evaluating 3292 patients were included. After meta-analysis, anterolateral ligament (ALL) injuries were associated with bone bruising on the lateral tibial plateau (LTP) (RR = 2.33; 95% CI 1.44-3.77; p = 0.0006), lateral femoral condyle (LFC) (RR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.37-2.85; p = 0.0003) and medial tibial plateau (MTP) (RR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.24-2.11; p = 0.0004); Moreover, medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries were associated with bone bruising on the femur (RR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.17-1.90; p = 0.001), and no statistical significance was found between bone bruising on the MTP and Kaplan fiber (KF) injuries (RR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.00-2.49; p = 0.05). Nonetheless, the current evidence did not conclude that bone bruises were associated with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries.

Conclusion

For individuals with an ACL injury, bone bruises of the LTP, LFC, and MTP can assist in the diagnosis of ALL injuries. Furthermore, femoral bruising has potential diagnostic value for MCL injuries. Knowing these associations allows surgeons to be alert to ACL-related ligament injuries on MRI and during operations in future clinical practice.

Fear of reinjury following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This review aims to elucidate the most commonly reported method to quantify fear of reinjury or kinesiophobia and to identify key variables that influence the degree of kinesiophobia following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic search across three databases (Pubmed, Ovid (MEDLINE), and EMBASE) was conducted from database inception to August 7th, 2022. The authors adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and resulted in 2,213 total patients with a mean age of 27.6 years and a mean follow-up time of 36.7 months post-surgery. The mean MINORS score of the included studies was 11 out of 16 for non-comparative studies and 18 out of 24 for comparative studies. Eighty-eight percent of included studies used variations of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) to quantify kinesiophobia and 27.0% used Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI). The results of this study shows a common association between higher kinesiophobia and poor patient-reported functional status measured using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Scores, Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Quality of Life (QOL), and Sports/Recreation (S/R) subscales of Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm scores. Postoperative symptoms and pain catastrophizing measured using the KOOS pain and symptom subscales and Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) also influenced the degree of kinesiophobia following ACLR. Patients with an increased injury to surgery time and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively demonstrated higher levels of kinesiophobia. Less common variables included being a female patient, low preoperative and postoperative activity status and low self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The most common methods used to report kinesiophobia following primary ACLR were variations of the TSK scale followed by ACL-RSI. The most commonly reported factors influencing higher kinesiophobia in this patient population include lower patient-reported functional status, more severe postoperative symptoms such as pain, increased injury to surgery time, and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively. Kinesiophobia following primary ACLR is a critical element affecting post-surgical outcomes, and screening should be implemented postoperatively to potentially treat in rehabilitation and recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Efficacy of Repair for ACL Injury: A Meta‑analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

We aim to compare the curative effect of primary repair for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with reconstruction and provide the reliable evidence for its clinical application. The literatures were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Springer, and other medical literature databases published between January 1970 and June 2021. Basic characteristics, surgery technique, clinical outcome scores and physical examination results were recorded and evaluated. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCT) were eligible for inclusion. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between arthroscopic ACL repair and ACL reconstruction for Tegner, Lysholm, Lachman, KT-1000, range of motion (ROM), functional outcomes and reoperation rate (P>0.05), even the result of IKDC scores showed that arthroscopic repair was better than reconstruction (P=0.04). However, through the subgroup analysis, it was found that the short-term follow-up results of arthroscopic ACL repair were indeed better than those of open ACL repair. Therefore, we can assume that the arthroscopic ACL repair technique is an optional and promising surgical method to treat ACL injury.

Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autograft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial, with increasing interest in the usage of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus traditional hamstring tendon (HT) use. The current study undertakes an in-depth review and comparison of the clinical and functional outcomes of QT and HT autografts in ACLR.

HYPOTHESIS

The QT autograft is equivalent to the HT autograft and there will be little or no significant difference in the outcomes between these 2 autografts.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from their inception until November 2020. All observational studies comparing ACLR QT and HT autografts were assessed for their methodological quality. Patient outcomes were compared according to patient-reported outcome measures (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Cincinnati, Lysholm, Tegner, and visual analog scale [VAS] measures), knee extensor and flexor torque limb symmetry indices (LSIs), hamstring to quadriceps (H/Q) ratios, functional hop capacity, knee laxity, ipsilateral graft failure, and contralateral injury.

RESULTS

A total of 20 observational studies comprising 28,621 patients (QT = 2550; HT = 26,071) were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. In comparison with patients who received an HT autograft, those who received a QT autograft had similar postoperative Lysholm (mean difference [MD], 0.67; P = .630), IKDC (MD, 0.48; P = .480), VAS pain (MD, 0.04; P = .710), and Cincinnati (MD, -0.85; P = .660) scores; LSI for knee flexor strength (MD, 6.06; P = .120); H/Q ratio (MD, 3.22; P = .160); hop test LSI (MD, -1.62; P = .230); pivot-shift test grade 0 (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P = .180); Lachman test grade 0 (OR, 2.38; P = .320), side-to-side laxity (MD, 0.09; P = .650); incidence of graft failure (OR, 1.07; P = .830) or contralateral knee injury (OR, 1.22; P = .610); and Tegner scores (MD, 0.11; P = .060). HT autografts were associated with a higher (better) side-to-side LSI for knee extensor strength (MD, -6.31; P = .0002).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, the use of the QT autograft was equivalent to the HT autograft in ACLR, with comparable graft failure and clinical and functional outcomes observed. However, HT autografts were associated with better LSI knee extensor strength.

Prediction of individual graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using anthropometric data

INTRODUCTION

Multiple options for individual anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction exist; still, there are no guidelines for the preoperative preparation. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between patients' anthropometric data (height, weight, and age) and measurements of potential tendons (quadriceps-, patella, hamstrings tendon) for an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MR images of 102 patients have been analyzed. Measurements of the ACL were performed with respect to its length and angle. The diameter and length as well as width of the quadriceps and patella tendon, the cross-sectional area (CSA) and diameter of the hamstring tendons have been assessed. Patients' height, weight, BMI, sex and age have been recorded. The correlations of these measurements with the patients' anthropometric data have been calculated. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability based on intra-class correlation (ICC) was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean lengths of the ACL were 29.8 ± 3.5 mm, tibial insertion sites 15.8 ± 2.5 mm and femoral insertion sites 15.2 ± 3.0 mm. Thickness of the quadriceps tendons was 4.7 ± 1.1 mm and patella tendon 3.2 ± 0.7 mm. The patients' height showed significant positive correlations with the CSA of the hamstring tendon measurements, the length of the ACL, and the insertion sites of the ACL. Patients' weight showed significant positive correlations with patella tendon thickness, the CSA of the hamstring tendons, the length of the ACL, and the tibial and femoral insertion sites. Patients' age showed a significant positive correlation with patella tendon thickness. The ICCs for intra- and inter-rater reliability were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-0.99, p < 0.001) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-0.99, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Anthropometric data with respect to height, weight, and sex can help to predict the dimension of tendons for ACL reconstruction and do correlate with ACL tendon. Patients at risk for small graft dimensions and failure are younger than 20 years and physically active. MRIs of patients at risk for small graft dimensions should be analyzed on tendon length and cross section areas preoperatively to determine the appropriate tendon harvest and fixation technique.

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best type of autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains debatable.

HYPOTHESIS

Compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has comparable graft survival as well as clinical function and pain outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting comparisons of QT versus BPTB or HT autografts for ACL reconstruction were included. All analyses were stratified according to study design: RCTs or observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were included: 7 RCTs and 17 observational studies. The 7 RCTs included 388 patients, and the 17 observational studies included 19,196 patients. No significant differences in graft failure (P = .36), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score (P = .39), or the side-to-side difference in stability (P = .60) were noted between QT and BPTB autografts. However, a significant reduction in donor site morbidity was noted in the QT group compared with the BPTB group (risk ratio [RR], 0.17 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]; P < .001). No significant differences in graft failure (P = .57), the IKDC subjective score (P = .25), or the side-to-side stability difference (P = .98) were noted between QT and HT autografts. However, the QT autograft was associated with a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity than the HT autograft (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93]; P = .02). A similar graft failure rate between the QT and control groups was observed after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. However, a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity was observed in the QT group compared with the control group after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. No difference in effect estimates was seen between RCTs and observational studies.

CONCLUSION

The QT autograft had comparable graft survival, functional outcomes, and stability outcomes compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, donor site morbidity was significantly lower with the QT autograft than with BPTB and HT autografts.

Comparison of Rotatory and Sagittal Laxity After Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Outcomes at 7-Year Follow-up

Background:

Biomechanical studies have shown excellent anteroposterior and rotatory laxity control after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but no clinical studies have compared midterm (>5-year) residual laxity between the DB and single-bundle (SB) techniques.

Purpose:

To clinically compare sagittal and rotatory laxities and residual sagittal laxity on the KT-1000 arthrometer between patients treated with an SB ACL reconstruction and those treated with a DB ACL reconstruction at the 7-year follow-up.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 110 patients were included between January 2006 and December 2007. The patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: those treated with SB ACL reconstruction (n = 63) and those treated with the DB technique (n = 47). All patients were then reviewed at a minimum of 7 years of follow-up; patients with ACL rerupture (n = 3 in the SB group and n = 2 in the DB group) were excluded from the postoperative comparative analysis. Residual anterior laxity (Lachman test), rotatory laxity (pivot-shift test), and sagittal laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference) were measured and compared between the 2 groups.

Results:

The mean age at surgery was 23.0 ± 5.1 years for the DB group and 28.1 ± 7.0 years for the SB group, and the mean follow-up was 7.4 ± 0.8 years. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, preoperative laxity on KT-1000, preoperative Tegner score, or concomitant meniscal lesions. Residual postoperative laxity via Lachman testing (P < .01), pivot-shift testing (P = .042), and the KT-1000 arthrometer (P < .01) was statistically significantly in favor of DB reconstruction.

Conclusion:

DB ACL reconstruction allowed better control of anterior stability during the evaluation via the Lachman test and via objective measurement on the KT-1000, as well as rotatory stability at a minimum of 7 years of follow-up.

Autograft and Nonirradiated Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Demonstrate Similar Clinical Outcomes and Graft Failure Rates: An Updated Systematic Review

Purpose

To perform an updated systematic review comparing the clinical outcomes of autograft versus nonirradiated allograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies directly comparing outcomes of primary ACLR with autograft versus nonirradiated allograft with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The search terms used were: “anterior cruciate ligament” AND autograft AND allograft AND (irradiation OR non-irradiated). Patients were evaluated based on graft failure rates, the Objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, anteroposterior laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (Subjective IKDC score, the visual analog scale [VAS], the Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Lysholm, and Tegner scores). Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool for non-randomized and randomized studies, respectively.

Results

Sixteen studies (3 Level I, 7 Level II, 6 Level III) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 15,502 patients undergoing ACLR with autograft and 1,577 with nonirradiated allograft. The average follow-up ranged from 24.0 to 132.0 months. Graft failure ranged from 0% to 9.4% of patients in the autograft group and 0% to 26.5% in the allograft group. Two studies showed greater failure rates among younger patients in the allograft group. There were no significant differences between the Objective IKDC score, anteroposterior laxity, or patient-reported outcomes between the groups within any of the included studies (P > .05).

Conclusions

Autograft and nonirradiated allograft for primary ACLR demonstrate similar patient-reported outcomes and graft failure rates.

Level of Evidence

III, systematic review of level I-III studies.

Management of Patella Fracture Nonunion and Large Bone Defect After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: A Case Report

CASE

A 32-year-old patient was diagnosed with a vertical patella fracture nonunion after a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In addition, a 1 × 2 × 1 cm patellar bone defect was noticed at the graft harvesting site. The patient was treated surgically with open reduction and internal fixation and iliac crest bone autograft which resulted in fracture union.

CONCLUSION

Many intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for iatrogenic patella fracture when harvesting BTB autograft were identified. Surgeons should be aware of technical skills needed to prevent this complication and should treat the fracture appropriately to avoid nonunion and optimize the outcome.

Optimizing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Individualizing the decision-making process using data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry: 2018 OREF award paper

Despite years of study, controversy remains regarding the optimal graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), suggesting that a single graft type is not ideal for all patients. A large community based ACLR Registry that collects prospective data is a powerful tool that captures information and can be analyzed to optimize surgery for individual patients. The studies highlighted in this paper were designed to optimize and individualize ACLR surgery and have led to changes in surgeon behavior and improvements in patient outcomes. Kaiser Permanente (KP) is an integrated health care system with 10.6 million members and more than 50 hospitals. Every KP member who undergoes an ACLR is entered into the Registry, and prospectively monitored. The Registry uses a variety of feedback mechanisms to disseminate Registry findings to the ACLRR surgeons and appropriately influence clinical practices and enhance quality of care. Allografts were found to have a 3.0 times higher risk of revision than bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. Allograft irradiation >1.8 Mrad, chemical graft processing, younger patients, BPTB allograft, and male patients were all associated with a higher risk of revision surgery. By providing feedback to surgeons, overall allograft use has decreased by 27% and allograft use in high-risk patients ≤21 years of age decreased 68%. We have identified factors that influence the outcomes of ACLR. Statement of Clinical Significance: We found that information derived from an ACLR Registry and shared with the participating surgeons directly decreased the use of specific procedures and implants associated with poor outcomes.

Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation

Clinical evaluation and management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most widely researched topics in orthopedic sports medicine, giving providers ample data on which to base their practices. The ACL is also the most commonly treated knee ligament. This study reports on current topics and research in clinical management of ACL injury, starting with evaluation, operative versus nonoperative management, and considerations in unique populations. Discussion of graft selection and associated procedures follows. Areas of uncertainty, rehabilitation, and prevention are the final topics before a reflection on the current state of ACL research and clinical management of ACL injury. Level of evidence V.

Autograft Versus Allograft for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background:

Patients with recurrent lateral patellar dislocations are often treated with reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL).

Purpose:

To perform a systematic review to evaluate clinical outcomes and the risk of recurrent patellar dislocation after MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) with autograft versus allograft.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The authors conducted a search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies comparing outcomes of MPFLR with autograft versus allograft. The inclusion criteria were full-text studies that directly compared clinical outcomes and/or risk of recurrent patellar instability between patients undergoing MPFLR with autograft versus allograft. A quality assessment was performed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score, and risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions and the Cochrane Collaboration tools.

Results:

Seven studies (1 evidence level 2, 3 level 3, 3 level 4) that met inclusion criteria were identified and included a total of 150 patients who underwent MPFLR with autograft and 193 with MPFLR with allograft. One study found a significantly higher failure rate among patients with autograft, and another study found a trend toward a significantly higher failure rate among patients with autograft. One study demonstrated no significant difference between postoperative tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance (measured on magnetic resonance imaging scans) in failed versus successful grafts. One study found that patellar tilt angle improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively (P < .001) but there was no difference between the groups. Kujala scores significantly improved for both autograft and allograft groups across studies. Two studies found significant differences in postoperative Kujala scores between the 2 groups, 1 of which found better scores in the allograft group (P = .0032) and another in which scores were better in the autograft group (P = .02).

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing MPFLR with either autograft or allograft can expect to experience improvement in clinical outcomes. Subjective outcomes improved to a similar degree in both groups. Graft failure was more frequently observed in patients with autograft. Allograft may be a better option for MPFLR owing to lower failure rate.

Current concepts in graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is important for optimizing post-operative rehabilitation, facilitating return to full sporting function and reducing the risk of complications.The most commonly used grafts for ACLR include hamstring tendon autografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts, quadriceps tendon autografts, allografts and synthetic grafts.This instructional review explores the existing literature on clinical outcomes with these different graft types for ACLR and provides an evidence-based approach for graft selection in ACLR.The existing evidence on the use of extra-articular tenodesis to provide additional rotational stability during ACLR is also revisited. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:808-815. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210023.

Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus-Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons

Introduction

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and semitendinosus-gracilis (STG) are the commonest grafts used for ACL reconstruction. However even after having been debated for years, there is no consensus about the ideal graft. Moreover, the literature is deficient about STG graft with preserved tibial insertion (STGPI) which preserves the proprioception. Our aim is to compare the outcome of BPTB, free STG and STGPI grafts after ACL reconstruction in professional sports persons. We compared the outcome in terms of mechanical stability, functional outcome, return to sports activity and degenerative changes.

Material and Methods

Professional sports persons aged between 16-50 years operated for ACL tear using BPTB, free STG and STGPI grafts with minimum follow-up of two years were identified from hospital records. Patients with associated knee injuries were excluded. Patients, divided in three groups according to graft used, were compared in terms of mechanical stability (arthrometric examination KT-1000 score), functional outcome (Lysholm Score), return to sports activity (Tegner score and difference in thigh circumference) and degenerative changes (KL grading).

Results

BPTB graft group was found to be better than free STG and STGPI graft groups in terms of KT-1000 score. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of Lysholm score, Tegner score, difference in thigh circumference and KL grading.

Conclusion

BPTB graft is better than free STG and STGPI grafts in terms of knee stability. When compared for patient reported outcome, return to sports activity, osteoarthritic changes and graft failure there is no significant difference among the three types of grafts.

The Statistical Fragility of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based medicine utilizes data to inform clinical decision making, despite the ability of a small number of outcome reversals to change statistical significance. P values are common measurements of statistical significance that possess inherent flaws. The inclusion of the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) may provide a clearer conveyance of statistical strength.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to examine the statistical stability of studies comparing hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with independent tunnel drilling. We hypothesized that the findings of these studies are vulnerable to a small number of outcome event reversals, often fewer than the number of patients lost to follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Comparative studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 10 leading orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2020 were analyzed. Statistical significance was defined as a P value ≤.05. FI for each outcome was determined by the number of event reversals necessary to alter significance. FQ was calculated by dividing the FI by the respective sample size.

RESULTS

Of the 1803 studies screened, 643 met initial search criteria, with 18 comparative studies ultimately included for analysis, 8 of which were RCTs. A total of 114 outcomes were examined. Overall, the mean (interquartile range) FI and FQ were 3.77 (2-4) and 0.040 (0.016-0.055), respectively. The FI was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up for 76.3% of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Studies examining graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not be as statistically stable as previously thought. Comparative studies and RCTs are at substantial risk for statistical fragility, with few event reversals required to alter significance. The reversal of <4 outcome events in a treatment group can alter the statistical significance of a given result; this is commonly fewer than the number of patients lost to follow-up. Future comparative study analyses might consider including FI and FQ with P values in their statistical analysis.

Aging Decreases the Ultimate Tensile Strength of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether aging imparts a clinically significant effect on the (1) mechanism of graft failure and (2) structural, material, and viscoelastic properties of patellar tendon allografts by evaluating these properties in younger donors (≤30 years of age) and older donors (>50 years of age).

METHODS

A total of 34 younger (≤30 years of age) and 34 older (>50 years of age) nonirradiated, whole bone-tendon-bone allografts were prepared for testing by isolating the central third of the patellar tendon using a double-bladed 10-mm width scalpel under a 10-N load to ensure uniformity of harvest. Bone blocks were potted in polymethylmethacrylate within custom molds. Tendon length and cross-sectional area were measured using an area micrometer. A mechanical loading system was used to precondition the grafts for 100 cycles with a load between 50 N and 250 N (1 Hz). A creep load (500 N) was then applied at a rate of 100 mm/min (10 minutes). Grafts were allowed to recover at 1 N (10 minutes), followed by pull-to-failure at a rate of 100% strain per second. Mechanisms of failure (midsubstance vs avulsion) were noted and the structural, material, and viscoelastic properties calculated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

There were 33 (97%) midsubstance tears in the younger group and 28 (82%) in the older group (P = .034). Younger grafts showed greater ultimate load to failure (1,782 N [1,533, 2,032] vs 1,319 N [1,103, 1,533]) (P = .006) and ultimate tensile stress (37.4 MPa [32.4, 42.4] vs 27.5 MPa [22.9, 32.0]) (P = .006). There were no significant differences in displacement (P = .595), stiffness (P = .950), strain (P = .783), elastic modulus (P = .114), creep displacement (P = .881), and creep strain (P = .614).

CONCLUSIONS

This in vitro study suggests that aging weakens the bone-tendon junction and decreases the ultimate tensile strength of patellar tendon allografts. However, aging did not affect the displacement, strain, stiffness, elastic modulus, creep displacement, or creep strain of patellar tendon allografts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should be aware that patellar tendon allografts from donors >50 years of age have a lower ultimate tensile stress than donors ≤30 years of age.

Risk Factors for Requiring a Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is considered as a successful orthopaedic procedure that attempts to help patients return to their preinjury level of activity. However, some patients may need to undergo revision surgery, and this potentially may be associated with certain surgery-specific or patient risk factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the potential role of (1) demographics, (2) family history, (3) graft choice, (4) sport, and (5) mechanism of injury (contact vs. noncontact) in the risk for needing a revision ACL for improved clinical outcomes. All patients who had undergone a primary ACL reconstruction between 2012 and 2016 were identified from at a single institution. About 312 patients who had a mean age of 24 years (range, 9-62 years) and a mean follow-up of 4 years (range, 1-10). Patients were further evaluated to identify those who had a revision. There were 19 patients (6.1%) with a mean age of 22 years (range, 13-38 years) and a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 1-10) that required a revision reconstruction. Gender ratios (p = 0.56) and mean age (p = 0.44) were similar among the cohorts. Family history of ACL reconstruction had no association with revision risk (p = 0.57). Those with tibialis anterior allografts (37 vs. 4%; p = 0.0001) and hamstring allografts (16 vs. 1%; p = 0.0001) were far more likely to undergo a revision. Bone-tendon-bone (BTB) patella autografts were less likely (26 vs. 73%; p = 0.0001). Sport did not play a role in revision with those injured playing basketball (p = 0.61), football (p = 0.52), lacrosse (p = 0.52), soccer (p = 0.83), and volleyball (p = 0.61). There were a greater percentage of contact injuries that required revision (95 vs. 77%; p = 0.07). Graft selection played a significant role in requiring revision surgery with allografts portending to higher revision rates and BTB patella autografts conferring a lower risk.

Clinical Results of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review from the SANTI Study Group

Lateral extraarticular procedures (LEAPs) in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee were widely abandoned in the 1990s but have seen a recent resurgence. The aim of this review was to demonstrate that anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) is associated with evidence of significant advantages and no evidence of historical concerns. A narrative review of the literature was performed. Combined ACL + ALLR is associated with improved outcomes when compared against isolated ACL reconstruction, including a significantly lower risk of ACL graft rupture (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.327, 95% CI: 0.130-0.758), a significantly lower risk of reoperation for secondary meniscectomy following medial meniscal repair at the time of ACL reconstruction (HR: 0.443, 95% CI: 0.218-0.866), significantly increased likelihood of return to the preinjury level of sport following primary (odds ratio [OR]: 1.938, 95% CI: 1.174-3.224) and revision ACL reconstruction (57.1 vs. 25.6%, respectively; p = 0.008), and in chronic ACL injuries, less residual pivot shift (9.1 vs. 35.3%, p = 0.011), and better IKDC (92.7 ± 5.9 vs. 87.1 ± 9.0, p = 0.0013) and Lysholm (95.4 ± 5.3 vs. 90.0 ± 7.1, p < 0.0001) scores, and no evidence of historical concerns. Combined ACLR + ALLR is associated with excellent clinical outcomes with no evidence of the adverse events that led to the historical widespread abandonment of other types of LEAP. Specifically, comparative series have demonstrated significant advantages of ALLR when compared against isolated ACLR with respect to reduced rates of ACL graft rupture, secondary meniscectomy, persistent instability, and significantly improved functional outcomes and improved return to sport metrics.

The deep lateral femoral notch sign: a reliable diagnostic tool in identifying a concomitant anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligament injury

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the deep lateral femoral notch sign (DLFNS) in identifying a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/anterolateral ligament (ALL) rupture and predicting the clinical outcomes following an anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that patients with a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture would have an increased DLFNS compared to patients without a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture.

METHODS

The lateral preoperative radiographs and MRI images of 100 patients with an ACL rupture and 100 control subjects were evaluated for the presence of a DLFNS and ACL/ALL rupture, respectively. The patients were evaluated clinically preoperatively and at a minimum 1 year following the ACL reconstruction. A receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed to define the optimal cut-off value of the DLFNS for identifying a concomitant ACL/ALL injury. The relative risk (RR) was also calculated to determine whether the presence of the DLFNS was a risk factor for residual instability or ACL graft rupture following an ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

The prevalence of DLFNS was 52% in the ACL-ruptured patients and 15% in the control group. At a minimum 1-year follow-up, 35% (6/17) of the patients with DLFNS > 1.8 mm complained of persistent instability, and an MRI evaluation demonstrated a graft re-rupture rate of 12% (2/17). In patients with a DLFNS < 1.8 mm, 8% (7/83) reported a residual instability, and the graft rupture rate was 2.4% (2/83). A DLFNS > 1.8 mm demonstrated a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 95%, a negative predictive value of 98%, and a positive predictive value of 89% in identifying a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture. Patients with a DLFNS > 1.8 mm had 4.2 times increased risk for residual instability and graft rupture compared to patients with a DLFNS ≤ 1.8 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

A DLFNS > 1.8 mm could be a clinically relevant diagnostic tool for identifying a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture with high sensitivity and PPV. Patients with a DLFNS > 1.8 mm should be carefully evaluated for clinical and radiological signs of a concomitant ACL/ALL rupture and treated when needed with a combined intra-articular ACL reconstruction and extra-articular tenodesis to avoid a residual rotational instability and ACL graft rupture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

3T MRI-based anatomy of the anterolateral knee ligament in patients with and without an ACL-rupture: Implications for anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is often accompanied by an injury to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee. Detailed knowledge of the ALL attachments in ACL-ruptured patients is essential for an anatomical ALL reconstruction to avoid knee over-constraint and successfully treat the residual rotational instability. The aim of the present study was to investigate the three-dimensional (3D), topographic anatomy of the ALL attachment in both ACL-ruptured and ACL-intact patients using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3T MRI).

METHODS

In the present, retrospective case-control study, the magnetic resonance images of 90 knees with an ACL-rupture and 90 matched-controlled subjects, who suffered a non-contact knee injury without an ACL-rupture, were used to create 3D models of the knee. The femoral and tibial ALL footprints were outlined on each model, and their position was measured using an anatomical coordinate system.

RESULTS

The femoral origin of the ALL was located 4.9 ± 2.8 mm posterior and 3.8 ± 2.4 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle in a non-isometric location in control subjects. In ACL-ruptured patients, it was located in a more posterior and distal, at 6.0 ± 1.9 mm posterior and 2.4 ± 1.7 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle (p < 0.01), also in a non-isometric location. No difference was found in the tibial ALL insertion between groups.

CONCLUSION

The femoral ALL origin was significantly different in ACL-ruptured patients compared to ACL-intact patients. The recommended femoral tunnel position for the anatomical ALL reconstruction, does not represent the femoral ALL origin in the ACL-ruptured knee.

In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft

PURPOSE

Preoperative assessment to determine the sizes of potential autografts is necessary for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, no study has investigated the prediction of the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft based upon preoperative imaging. This study investigated the correlation between the intraoperative diameter of a QT autograft and in situ thickness or cross-sectional area (CSA) measured using preoperative MRI.

METHODS

Thirty-one knees of 31 patients (mean age 20.9 ± 5.0 years) who underwent individualized anatomic ACLR using all soft tissue QT autograft were included retrospectively. At 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella, the maximum QT thickness was assessed in the sagittal plane and the CSA was assessed at the central 10 mm of the QT in the axial plane. The angle between the axial plane and a line perpendicular to the QT longitudinal axis was used to calculate an adjusted CSA using a cosine function. Intraoperatively, each QT autograft was harvested with 10 mm width and the diameter was measured using a graft sizing device.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of all measurements using preoperative MRI were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.833-0.970). Significant correlations were observed between the thickness, CSA, or adjusted CSA, and the intraoperative diameter (R = 0.434, 0.607, and 0.540, respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CSA correlated most strongly with the QT autograft diameter. For individualized anatomic ACLR, measuring in situ CSA can be useful for preoperative planning of appropriate graft choices prior to surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparative Efficacy of Graft Options in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of various graft options for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using network meta-analysis.

Methods

A medical literature search was conducted of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from their inception through March 1, 2019. The outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Lachman test, Lysholm score, Pivot shift test, and Tegner score, were evaluated among graft options. Data extraction was carried out according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a network meta-analysis was performed using STATA 14.0.

Results

A total of 45 trials with 3992 patients were included. The forest plots revealed no significant differences in IKDC, Lysholm, or Tegner score among the grafts. In Lachman score, a significant difference was found in the comparisons of hamstring tendon allograft (HT-AL) versus patellar tendon autograft (PT-AU) and HT-AL versus hamstring tendon autograft (HT-AU). In pivot shift test, PT-AU was superior to all the other grafts, and quadriceps tendon autograft (QT-AU) was superior to HT-AL and artificial ligament (Art-L) in the number of cases with negative results. According to surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA), PT-AU had the highest probability to be the best intervention in Lachman test and Tegner score; tibialis anterior tendon allograft (TA-AL) in IKDC and Lysholm score; and QT-AU in pivot shift test. Based on the cluster analysis of SUCRA, PT-AU was considered the most appropriate intervention by IKDC and Lachman test.

Conclusion

This study suggests that PT-AU may be the most appropriate graft for ACL reconstruction according to IKDC and Lachman test results.

Level of Evidence

Level I, network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xenograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was associated with high graft processing infection

Purpose

To evaluate clinical ad radiological outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with an immunochemically modified porcine patellar tendon xenograft controlled against human Achilles tendon allograft at 24-month minimum follow-up.

Methods

66 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were randomized into 2 groups: 34 allografts and 32 xenografts treated to attenuate the host immune response. Follow-up was 24-month minimum. Anterior knee stability was measured as KT − 1000 side-to-side laxity difference (respect to the contralateral healthy knee). Functional performance was assessed by one-legged hop test. Objective manual pivot-shift test and subjective (IKDC, Tegner and SF-36) outcomes were collected. MRI and standard X-Ray were performed.

Results

61 subjects (32 allograft, 29 xenograft) were evaluated at 12 and 24 months. Six of the subjects in xenograft group (20.6%) got an infection attributed to a water-based pathogen graft contamination in processing.

Intention-to-treat analysis (using the last observation carried forward imputation method) revealed higher KT − 1000 laxity in xenograft group at 24-month follow-up (P = .042). Also pivot-shift was higher in xenograft group at 12-month (P = .015) and 24-month follow-up (P = .038).

Per-protocol analysis (missing/contaminated subjects excluded) did not revealed clinical differences between groups.

Tibial tunnel widening in the allograft group was low, whereas xenograft tunnel widening was within the expected range of 20–35% as reported in the literature.

No immunological reactivity was associated to xenograft group.

Conclusions

High infection rate (20.6%) was reported in xenograft group. Both groups of patients achieved comparable clinical outcomes if missing/contaminated subjects are excluded. Improved harvesting/processing treatments in future studies using xenografts for ACL reconstruction are needed to reduce infection rate, otherwise xenograft should not be used in ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Multicenter and double-blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, Level I.

Factors associated with dynamic knee valgus angle during single-leg forward landing in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

A few studies have reported on how to predict increased dynamic knee valgus angle (KVA), a risk factor for second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to identify the factors with the potential to predict the KVA during single-leg hop landing.

Methods

Using three-dimensional motion analysis systems, knee motion during a single-leg hop landing task was measured in 22 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction at 8–10 months postoperatively. The KVA at initial contact (IC) and maximum KVA during the 40-ms period after IC were calculated using the point cluster technique; correlations between the KVA and other factors were assessed. We performed multiple regression analysis to determine whether KVA could be predicted by these parameters.

Results

The KVA was significantly negatively correlated with the static femorotibial angle (FTA; P < 0.01) and patient height (P < 0.01). It was positively correlated with the body mass index (P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that a small FTA could predict the KVA at IC (β: 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.24-(-0.42); P < 0.01). The maximum KVA during the 40-ms period after IC was associated with the FTA (β: 0.46, 95% CI: 2.22-(-0.26); P = 0.02) and height (β: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.59-(-0.02); P = 0.04).

Conclusion

At 8–10 months after ACL reconstruction, the KVA was significantly correlated with the FTA, with reduced FTA being associated with an increased dynamic KVA during single-leg hop landing. The measurement of anatomical parameters may aid in predicting the second ACL injury risk after reconstruction.

Lower incidence of post-operative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendons

PURPOSE

To determine and compare the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with autologous quadriceps tendon (with patellar bone block) compared to autologous hamstring tendons (semitendinosus and gracilis).

METHODS

A total of 1638 isolated R-ACLR with either autologous hamstring tendons (n = 1004, 61.3%) or quadriceps tendon (n = 634; 38.7%) were performed between 2004 and 2017 and were retrospectively analysed with regard to the occurrence of post-operative septic arthritis. The technique of R-ACLR did not significantly change during the years of the study. All patients received pre-op i.v.antibiotics, but no presoaking of the grafts in vancomycin was performed in the years of the study. The individual decision of graft choice was based on graft availability, tunnel position and the presence of tunnel widening. Generally, hamstring tendons were preferred. There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups regarding gender or age. Routine follow-up examination was performed 6 weeks after the index operation (follow-up rate 96.5%), and patients unsuspicious for septic arthritis at that time were classified as non-infected.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with septic arthritis were identified, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.85%. There was one patient with septic arthritis in the quadriceps tendon group (incidence: 0.16%) and 13 patients in the hamstring tendons group (incidence: 1.29%), respectively. The difference was significant (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this series, the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis after R-ACLR was lower when quadriceps tendon graft was used compared to hamstring tendon grafts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To compare patellar tendon (PT) autografts with 4-strand semitendinosus and gracilis (STG) autografts concerning knee stability, functional outcomes, as well as complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction at minimal follow-up of 5 years.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify published prospective randomized controlled trials on clinical studies comparing PT autograft and 4-strand STG autografts for ACL reconstruction. The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of knee stability (laxity measurements, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test), functional outcomes (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Cincinnati score, Tegner score, single-legged hop test, and return to preinjury activity level), and complications (loss of range of motion [ROM], pain, graft re-rupture, revision, and osteoarthritis [OA]).

RESULTS

Nine clinical studies with 630 patients (313 PT and 317 STG autografts) met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were found between the PT and STG group in Lachman test, pivot-shift test, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Cincinnati score, loss of ROM, kneeling pain, graft re-rupture rate, revision rate, and OA rate. The STG group was found with less anterior knee pain (P = .003). There were no clinically significant differences for the outcomes of SSD, Lysholm score, and Tegner score.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for significantly greater risk of anterior knee pain, PT autograft had comparable results with 4-strand STG autograft in terms of knee stability and functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction with mid- to long-term follow-up. Besides, we found no statistically significant difference in loss of ROM, kneeling pain, graft re-rupture rate, revision rate, and OA change, but these results were underpowered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Editorial Commentary: Patellar Tendon or Hamstring: Which Kind of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Patient Are You?

The role of graft selection on clinical and functional outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has gained significant attention in the orthopaedic sports medicine community in recent years. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and semitendinosus/gracilis hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are 2 of the most commonly used grafts, given their low failure rates, predictable outcomes, and ability to incorporate appropriately at the graft site. However, multiple studies have recently shown each of these graft options to have some potentially less-desirable characteristics in regards to outcomes in specific patient populations. More specifically, in 14- to 25-year-old athletes, HT autografts have been shown to result in decreased rotational stability, decreased return to sport rates, and increased graft failure rates. On the other hand, BPTB autografts can require a prolonged recovery period and have been associated with increased postoperative pain and long-term kneeling pain. HT and BPTB grafts are both excellent grafts; however, it is important to understand the differences in clinical and functional outcomes between these graft options for ACL reconstruction. The characteristics of the graft need to be considered and individualized for each patient who is being treated for an ACL injury.

Modified patellar side harvest technique for bone-patella, tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; a three-year prospective cohort

Purpose

To introduce and discuss the outcome of a modified patellar side harvest technique.

Methods

This prospective cohort was conducted on patients with torn ACL who were eligible candidates for surgical intervention. Demographics and baseline characteristics were gathered for each patient.

Results

In total, 1024 patients with a mean age of 30.6 ± 3.6 were enrolled in this cohort. Results of modified IKDC scores reported with good and excellent outcome in 75% of patients.

Conclusion

Most of the patients who underwent BPTB-ACL reconstruction surgery with modified patellar side harvest technique, experienced acceptable clinical outcome.

Are Patient and Surgeon Expectations after ACL Reconstruction Realistic?

BACKGROUND

Patient expectations may affect their satisfaction and functional outcomes after treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. Although there is evidence that patient expectations of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are inflated, there is limited knowledge about the relationship between physician and patient expectations and patient outcomes after they completely recover from ACLR. Furthermore, it is unclear if specific patient factors influence these expectations.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Are patient and surgeon expectations of knee function 18 months after ACLR similar? (2) Are patients' and surgeons' expectations of outcomes similar to patients' actual 2-year outcomes? (3) Is there a relationship between preoperative or intraoperative parameters and expectations? (4) Is there a relationship between preoperative or intraoperative parameters and 2-year ACLR outcomes?

METHODS

One-hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing primary ACLR were prospectively enrolled in this study, with 98 (76%) completing 2-year follow-up. Patients completed the IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients also completed the same questionnaires preoperatively to evaluate expected knee function 18 months after surgery. Immediately postoperatively, surgeons completed the same questionnaires regarding the expected postoperative outcome at 18 months postoperative. Preoperative and intraoperative data were collected to determine an association between expectations and outcomes. Nonparametric analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the paired Wilcoxon signed ranks tests and Spearman's correlations, as applicable.

RESULTS

There was no difference between patient and surgeon expectations (patient, 94.8 [range 47.4-100] versus surgeon, 94.3 [range 46-100]; p = 0.283), and there was no correlation between higher patient expectations and higher surgeon expectations (r = 0.168, p = 0.078). Patient and surgeon expectations were greater than the actual postoperative outcomes (2-year postoperative: 89.7 [range 32.2 to 100]; p < 0.0001); however, the differences are unlikely to be perceived. There was no correlation between higher 2-year postoperative outcomes and higher patient expectations (r = 0.14, p = 0.186) or higher surgeon expectations (r = 0.019, p = 0.86). Arthroscopic evidence of cartilage damage was independently associated with the worst patient and surgeon expectations. The surgeons themselves were also independently associated with surgeon expectation (p < 0.001). No parameters were associated with postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no clinically significant differences between surgeon expectations, patient expectations, and 2-year actual outcomes. However, there is also no correlation between the patient expectations, surgeon expectations, and actual outcomes. Although expectations are similar to actual outcomes for most patients, surgeons are unable to accurately predict outcomes for specific patients; thus, preventing adequate patient counseling. Surgeons should be cautious when evaluating and counseling patients preoperatively and avoid assuming high expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Factors associated with revision following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of registry data

BACKGROUND

To identify the patient and surgical factors associated with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction as reported by all national and community ACL registries.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Eligibility criteria included English studies published by national or community ACL registries reporting on primary ACL reconstruction and risk factors associated with revision ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies from the Swedish, Norwegian, Danish and Kaiser Permanente registries were included for review. Fourteen studies from all four registries reported younger age as a risk factor for revision ACL reconstruction. In addition, the Swedish registry reported concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, undergoing earlier surgery, lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), smaller graft diameter and an anteromedial portal drilling technique as risk factors for revision. The risk factors reported by the Norwegian registry included lower body mass index (BMI), lower KOOS, hamstring tendon grafts and suspensory fixation. The Danish registry reported hamstring tendon grafts, anteromedial portal drilling and suspensory fixation as risk factors. The Kaiser Permanente registry reported male sex, lower BMI, ethnicity, hamstring tendon grafts, allografts, smaller graft diameter and an anteromedial portal technique as risk factors for revision.

CONCLUSION

Multiple patient and surgical factors were associated with increased risk of revision ACL reconstruction in registries. Younger age and the use of hamstring tendon grafts were consistently reported as risk factors for failure.