1
|
Maldonado DR, Lee MS, Saeed SK, Bruning RE, Curley AJ, Domb BG. Dancers Show Significant Improvement in Outcomes and Favorable Return-to-Dance Rates After Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Femoral Head Cartilage Status Being a Predictor of Secondary Surgical Procedures at Mid-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:780-789. [PMID: 37532163 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report minimum 5-year follow-up patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) scores and return-to-dance rates in dancers who underwent primary hip arthroscopy and to identify predictors of secondary surgical procedures. METHODS Prospectively collected data from patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between May 2010 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they participated in dance at any level 1 year prior to surgery and had preoperative and minimum 5-year follow-up scores consisting of the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale pain score. The exclusion criteria were previous hip conditions, previous ipsilateral hip surgery, Tönnis grade greater than 1, or lateral center-edge angle less than 18°. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported. Dancers who discontinued dance for reasons other than pain in the operative hip were excluded from the return-to-dance analysis. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of secondary surgical procedures. RESULTS Fifty-one hips (48 female dancers) were included. The average age and average follow-up period were 29.8 ± 17.2 years and 79.1 ± 23.2 months, respectively. Improvement in all PROM scores (P < .001) was reported. Achievement rates of the MCID for the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, and visual analog scale pain score were 83.3%, 85.7%, and 85.7%, respectively. Revision hip arthroscopy was performed in 5 dancers (9.8%). Conversion to total hip arthroplasty was performed in 4 dancers (7.8%). The return-to-dance rate was 78.6%, with 57.6% returning to the preinjury performance level or a higher level. Higher femoral head Outerbridge grade was identified as a predictor of secondary surgical procedures (P = .045; odds ratio, 6.752 [95% confidence interval, 1.043-43.688]). CONCLUSIONS After primary hip arthroscopy, dancers experienced significant improvement in all PROM scores collected and achieved the MCID at a high rate at minimum 5-year follow-up. The return-to-dance rate in dancers who did not discontinue dance because of lifestyle transitions was 78.6%, with 57.6% returning to the preinjury performance level or a higher level. Higher femoral head Outerbridge grade was found to be a predictor of secondary surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Maldonado
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Michael S Lee
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Sheema K Saeed
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Rachel E Bruning
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maldonado DR, Owens JS, George T, Curley AJ, Domb BG. Acetabular Labral Reconstruction Does Not Demonstrate Superior Biomechanical Properties Compared to Labral Repair or Intact Native Labrum but Is Superior to Labral Excision: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:614-629. [PMID: 37270115 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review and compare biomechanical properties of labral reconstruction to labral repair, intact native labrum, and labral excision in cadaveric studies. METHODS A search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and checklist. Cadaveric studies focused on hip biomechanics related to intact labrum, labral repair, labral reconstruction, labral augmentation, and labral excision were included. Investigated parameters included biomechanical data measures, such as distraction force, distance to suction seal rupture, peak negative pressure, contact area, and fluid efflux. Review articles, duplicates, technique reports, case reports, opinion articles, articles written in a language other than English, clinical studies focusing on patient-reported outcomes, studies performed in animals, and articles with no abstract available were also excluded. RESULTS Fourteen cadaveric biomechanical studies were included that compared labral reconstruction to labral repair (4 studies), labral reconstruction to labral excision (4 studies); and evaluation of distractive force of the labrum (3 studies), the distance to suction seal rupture (3 studies), fluid dynamics (2 studies), displacement at peak force (1 study), and stability ratio (1 study). Data pooling was not performed because of methodological heterogenicity of the studies. Labral reconstruction did not outperform labral repair in restoring the hip suction seal or any other biomechanical property. Labral repair significantly prevented greater fluid efflux when compared to labral reconstruction. Labral repair and reconstruction improved the distractive stability of the hip fluid seal from the labral tear and labral excision stage, respectively. Furthermore, labral reconstruction demonstrated to have better biomechanical properties than labral excision. CONCLUSIONS In cadaveric studies, labral repair or intact native labrum was biomechanically more superior than labral reconstruction; however, labral reconstruction can restore acetabular labral biomechanical properties and was biomechanically superior to labral excision. CLINICAL RELEVANCE In cadaveric models, labral repair outperforms segmental labral reconstruction in preserving the hip suction seal; nonetheless, segmental labral reconstruction biomechanically outperforms labral excision at time 0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Maldonado
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Jade S Owens
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Tracy George
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prabhavalkar ON, Carbone AD, Curley AJ, Padmanabhan S, Nerys J, Domb BG. Endoscopic Tendon Compression Bridge Technique for Repair of Partial-Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears With Concomitant Arthroscopy for Labral Tears: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes With Benchmark Control Group. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:3764-3771. [PMID: 37960846 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231204314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transtendinous technique has been used to treat partial-thickness gluteus medius tears in the setting of concomitant arthroscopy for labral tears. The tendon compression bridge technique for gluteus medius repair has been developed as an alternative method, providing several advantages; however, comparative studies between the 2 techniques are lacking in the literature. PURPOSE (1) To evaluate the short-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the tendon compression bridge technique and (2) to compare these findings with short-term PROs of the transtendinous technique. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Data were prospectively collected on patients who were followed for a minimum of 2 years after an endoscopic tendon compression bridge procedure for gluteus medius repair in the setting of concomitant hip arthroscopy for labral tears. The following PROs were collected preoperatively and postoperatively: modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, visual analog scale score for pain, and the International Hip Outcome Tool. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Patient Acceptable Symptom State, minimal clinically important difference, and maximum outcome improvement satisfaction threshold. Patients were propensity matched 1:1 to a cohort that underwent gluteus medius repair using the endoscopic transtendinous technique with concomitant hip arthroscopy. RESULTS A total of 48 hips (48 patients) that met inclusion criteria (age, 53.3 ± 9.8 years; 92% female; body mass index, 26.7 ± 4.6), with a mean follow-up of 38.5 ± 15.7 months, were matched to 48 hips (46 patients) that underwent gluteus medius repair using the transtendinous technique. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement from preoperative scores to latest follow-up (P < .05). Mean magnitude of improvement and latest follow-up scores were not significantly different between the tendon compression bridge group and the transtendinous group, and the groups demonstrated similar favorable rates of achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (79% vs 79%, respectively), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (73% vs 73%, respectively), and Maximum Outcome Improvement Satisfaction threshold (65% vs 58%, respectively) for modified Harris Hip Score (P > .05). Patient satisfaction between groups was similar (8.1 ± 2.2 vs 7.7 ± 2.7, respectively) (P = .475). CONCLUSION At minimum 2-year follow-up, the endoscopic tendon compression bridge technique for partial-thickness gluteus medius tears, when performed with concomitant hip arthroscopy, was associated with significant improvement in functional outcomes. These postoperative results were comparable with those of a matched cohort that underwent the endoscopic transtendinous technique for partial-thickness gluteus medius tears, suggesting that the tendon compression bridge technique for gluteus medius repair is an effective treatment option for partial-thickness gluteus medius tears.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew D Carbone
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Julio Nerys
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maldonado DR, George T, Padmanabhan S, Curley AJ, Domb BG. Defining Thresholds and Predictors for Achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Revision Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:3772-3780. [PMID: 37975493 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231209320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after primary hip arthroscopy has been determined; nonetheless, the PASS still needs to be defined for revision hip arthroscopy. PURPOSE To define minimum 2-year follow-up PASS thresholds for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) after revision hip arthroscopy, and to identify predictors of achieving the PASS. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy between April 2017 and July 2020. Patients were included if they had baseline and minimum 2-year follow-up scores for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS for pain, and iHOT-12. PASS was calculated using the anchor-based method. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the thresholds for the PASS. A multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for achieving the PASS. RESULTS A total of 318 patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy met the inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 292 (91.8%) had baseline and minimum 2-year follow-up. Of this group, 68 patients (72.1% female and 27.9% male; mean age, 32.9 years) answered the PASS anchor question. Achievement PASS rates were 58.8%, 41.2%, 52.9%, 60.3%, and 52.9% for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS, and iHOT-12, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the PASS for mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS, and iHOT-12 were 0.912, 0.888, 0.857, 0.903, and 0.871, respectively, indicating excellent discrimination. The PASS for the mHHS was 76 (sensitivity, 0.809; specificity, 0.905), for the NAHS was 86.3 (sensitivity, 0.660; specificity, 1), for the HOS-SSS was 64.3 (sensitivity, 0.745; specificity, 0.905), for the VAS was 3 (sensitivity, 0.830; specificity, 0.905), and for the iHOT-12 was 64.3 (sensitivity, 0.745; specificity, 0.905). Body mass index (BMI) was identified as a significant predictor of achieving PASS for the NAHS (OR, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.940-0.996; P = .027), as patients with a BMI ≤25.4 had 1.03 times higher odds ratio of achieving PASS for the NAHS. CONCLUSION After revision hip arthroscopy, the minimum 2-year follow-up PASS thresholds for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS for pain, and iHOT-12 were 76, 86.3, 64.3, 3, and 64.3, respectively. The odds ratio of achieving PASS for the NAHS was 1.03 times higher for patients with a BMI ≤25.4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Maldonado
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tracy George
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
George T, Curley AJ, Saeed SK, Kuhns BD, Parsa A, Domb BG. Orthobiologics as an adjunct in treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: cell-based therapies facilitate improved postoperative outcomes in the setting of acetabular chondral lesions-a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:6020-6038. [PMID: 37906291 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07624-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate studies utilizing orthobiologics in the management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) to (1) assess the indications for usage, and (2) analyze patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) following treatment. It was hypothesized that orthobiologics would (1) be utilized for symptomatic FAIS in the setting of labral or chondral pathology, and (2) improve PROM at most recent follow-up. METHODS The Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical studies evaluating orthobiologics [hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or cell-based therapy (CBT) for treatment of FAIS. Exclusion criteria included orthobiologics used in conjunction with cartilage transfer or scaffolding procedures and a primary indication other than FAIS. Data collection included patient demographics, indications, and baseline and most recent PROM. RESULTS Eleven studies (one level I, four level II, four level III, and two level IV evidence) met inclusion criteria, consisting of 440 patients with mean ages ranging from 32.8 to 47 years. All 11 studies demonstrated an improvement in PROM from baseline to most-recent follow-up. Four studies administered PRP either intraoperatively or the day after surgery as an adjunct to labral repair. CBT was used intraoperatively in the setting of acetabular chondral lesions (three studies) and labral repair (one study). When comparing to a control group at most recent follow-up, three PRP cohorts demonstrated similar PROM (n.s.), while one PRP group exhibited worse visual analog pain scores (2.5 vs. 3.4, p = 0.005) and modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) (82.6 vs. 78.7, p = 0.049). The four CBT studies reported favorable results compared to a control group, with a significantly higher mHHS at most recent follow-up or mean improvement from baseline in Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (p < 0.05). Three studies reported on HA, which was utilized exclusively in the nonoperative setting. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative PRP and CBT have been commonly reported in the setting of hip arthroscopy for labral repairs and acetabular chondral lesions, respectively. The CBT cohorts demonstrated more favorable PROM at most recent follow-up when compared to a control group, though these results should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity of orthobiologic preparations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy George
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL, 60018, USA
| | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL, 60018, USA
| | - Sheema K Saeed
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL, 60018, USA
| | - Benjamin D Kuhns
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL, 60018, USA
| | - Ali Parsa
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL, 60018, USA
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL, 60018, USA.
- American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL, 60018, USA.
- , 999 E Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Des Plaines, IL, 60018, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carbone AD, Prabhavalkar ON, Perez-Padilla PA, Curley AJ, Nerys-Figueroa J, Domb BG. Utility of 3D Planning Software in Understanding Residual Proximal Femoral Deformity for Planning of Revision Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:3434-3438. [PMID: 37740538 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231198051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the early evolution of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) treatment, undercorrection of femoral deformity was a leading cause of hip arthroscopy failures. As the pendulum has swung, overresection of femoral deformity has increased in prevalence as a cause of persistent hip pain after arthroscopy. Computed tomography (CT) scans are increasingly being used in hip arthroscopy for preoperative planning purposes and may allow for improved 3-dimensional (3D) assessment of complex femoral deformities after previous femoroplasty. PURPOSE To assess whether CT scans provide additional utility over standard radiographs in understanding proximal femoral morphology in patients being evaluated for revision hip arthroscopy after previous femoroplasty in the setting of FAI. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Preoperative CT scans and standard radiographs were obtained in 80 patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy for FAI. The anteroposterior and Dunn radiographic views were used to assess patients for residual proximal femoral deformity and were compared with the CT scan views using a commercially available software program. Determinations of underresection were made using alpha angle, while overresection was determined according to a previously described technique. Chi-square tests were performed to determine statistical significance between radiographic and CT classifications of overresection, underresection, and concomitant over- and underresection. A kappa value was calculated to determine the agreement between measurements on the radiographs and CT scans. RESULTS There were 30 patients (37.5%) for whom the CT scans revealed information about femoral morphology that was not detected on the radiographs. The kappa value of agreement was 0.28 between CT and radiographic measurements. Underresected cams were detected in 30 patients (37.5%) on CT scans versus 17 patients (21.3%) on radiographs (P = .024). Overresected cams were detected in 31 patients (38.8%) on CT scans versus 14 patients (17.5%) on radiographs (P = .0049). Concomitant areas of under- and overresection were detected in 12 patients (15.0%) on CT scans versus 3 patients (3.8%) on radiographs (P = .027). CONCLUSION CT scans with 3D planning software may be more sensitive than traditional radiographic views at detecting aberrant proximal femoral anatomy in the setting of failed FAI surgery. The use of 3D planning software may be considered as an adjunctive tool to better understand complex deformity in the proximal femur for the planning of revision hip arthroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Carbone
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Engler ID, Chang AY, Kaarre J, Shannon MF, Curley AJ, Smith CN, Hughes JD, Lesniak BP, Musahl V. Revision Rates After Primary Allograft ACL Reconstruction by Allograft Tissue Type in Older Patients. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231198538. [PMID: 37731958 PMCID: PMC10508052 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231198538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While there is extensive literature on the use of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there is limited clinical evidence to guide the surgeon in choice of allograft tissue type. Purpose To assess the revision rate after primary ACL reconstruction with allograft and to compare revision rates based on allograft tissue type and characteristics. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Patients who underwent primary allograft ACL reconstructions at a single academic institution between 2015 and 2019 and who had minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were missing surgical or allograft tissue type data. Demographics, operative details, and subsequent surgical procedures were collected. Allograft details included graft tissue type (Achilles, bone-patellar tendon-bone [BTB], tibialis anterior or posterior, semitendinosus, unspecified soft tissue), allograft category (all-soft tissue vs bone block), donor age, irradiation duration and intensity, and chemical cleansing process. Revision rates were calculated and compared by allograft characteristics. Results Included were 418 patients (age, 39 ± 12 years; body mass index, 30 ± 9 kg/m2). The revision rate was 3% (11/418) at a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 1.4 years. There were no differences in revision rate according to allograft tissue type across Achilles tendon (3%; 3/95), BTB (5%; 3/58), tibialis anterior or posterior (3%; 5/162), semitendinosus (0%; 0/46), or unspecified soft tissue (0%; 0/57) (P = .35). There was no difference in revision rate between all-soft tissue versus bone block allograft (6/283 [2%] vs 5/135 [4%], respectively; P = .34). Of the 51% of grafts with irradiation data, all grafts were irradiated, with levels varying from 1.5 to 2.7 Mrad and 82% of grafts having levels of <2.0 Mrad. There was no difference in revision rate between the low-dose and medium-to high-dose irradiation cohorts (4% vs 6%, respectively; P = .64). Conclusion Similarly low (0%-6%) revision rates after primary ACL reconstruction were seen regardless of allograft tissue type, bone block versus all-soft tissue allograft, and sterilization technique in 418 patients with mean age of 39 years. Surgeons may consider appropriately processed allograft tissue with or without bone block when indicating ACL reconstruction in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian D. Engler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Central Maine Healthcare Orthopedics, Central Maine Medical Center, Lewiston, Maine, USA
| | - Audrey Y. Chang
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Janina Kaarre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Michael F. Shannon
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew J. Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Clair N. Smith
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan D. Hughes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bryson P. Lesniak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lovallo JL, Murray RS, Wiesel BB, Curley AJ, Conroy CM, Johnson DC. Intraoperative Intra-articular Antibiotic Injection Reduces Infection in Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2023; 46:310-314. [PMID: 36853948 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20230224-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Deep infection is a debilitating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that an intra-articular, intraoperative injection of antibiotics would result in a lower infection rate compared with intravenous antibiotics alone. Before 2007, 164 patients (group A) did not receive intra-articular antibiotics. From 2007 to 2018, 1324 patients (group B) received intra-articular antibiotics. Patients received intra-articular gentamicin at the end of surgery with the addition of 1 g of cefazolin in January 2014. Records were retrospectively reviewed for comorbidities, type of surgery, and infection. The cohort that received intra-articular antibiotics was compared with the cohort that did not to determine the effect of prophylactic intra-articular antibiotic administration in preventing infection. There was 1 deep infection in the antibiotic group compared with 5 in the non-antibiotic group (P<.001). Superficial infections developed in 2 cases of patients treated with antibiotics; there were no superficial infections in patients treated without antibiotics (P=.62). One previous study evaluated intra-articular injection of antibiotics for shoulder arthroplasty and found significantly lower rates of infection with the injection of intra-articular gentamicin. In this retrospective follow-up study, the injection of intra-articular gentamicin or gentamicin and cefazolin effectively decreased rates of postoperative infection. At mean follow-up of 399 days, intra-articular antibiotics at the time of surgery resulted in significantly fewer deep infections. Given the minimal risk of adverse events and minimal cost, this is a valid method of reducing infections in total shoulder arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):310-314.].
Collapse
|
9
|
Curley AJ, Bruning RE, Padmanabhan S, Jimenez AE, Laude F, Domb BG. Periacetabular osteotomy with intraoperative computer-assisted modalities: a systematic review. J Hip Preserv Surg 2023; 10:104-118. [PMID: 37900886 PMCID: PMC10604052 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnad005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of intraoperative computer-assisted modalities for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), as well as the perioperative and post-operative outcomes for these techniques, remains poorly defined. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the techniques and outcomes of intraoperative computer-assisted modalities for PAO. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL/EBSCOHost and Cochrane) were searched for clinical studies reporting on computer-assisted modalities for PAO. Exclusion criteria included small case series (<10 patients), non-English language and studies that did not provide a description of the computer-assisted technique. Data extraction included computer-assisted modalities utilized, surgical techniques, demographics, radiographic findings, perioperative outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications and subsequent surgeries. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 208 patients with average ages ranging from 26 to 38 years. Intraoperative navigation was utilized in seven studies, patient-specific guides in one study and both modalities in one study. Three studies reported significantly less intraoperative radiation exposure (P < 0.01) in computer-assisted versus conventional PAOs. Similar surgical times and estimated blood loss (P > 0.05) were commonly observed between the computer-assisted and conventional groups. The average post-operative lateral center edge angles in patients undergoing computer-assisted PAOs ranged from 27.8° to 37.4°, with six studies reporting similar values (P > 0.05) compared to conventional PAOs. Improved PROs were observed in all six studies that reported preoperative and post-operative values of patients undergoing computer-assisted PAOs. Computer-assisted modalities for PAO include navigated tracking of the free acetabular fragment and surgical instruments, as well as patient-specific cutting guides and rotating templates. Compared to conventional techniques, decreased intraoperative radiation exposure and similar operative lengths were observed with computer-assisted PAOs, although these results should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneous operative techniques and surgical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute, 999 East Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL 60018, USA
| | - Rachel E Bruning
- American Hip Institute, 999 East Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL 60018, USA
| | | | - Andrew E Jimenez
- American Hip Institute, 999 East Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL 60018, USA
| | - Frédéric Laude
- Hip & Pelvis Surgery at Clinique du Sport, 36, Boulevard Saint-Marcel, Paris 75005, France
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute, 999 East Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL 60018, USA
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, 999 East Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL 60018, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sabzevari S, Charles S, Reddy RP, Curley AJ, Kaarre J, Prasad A, Lin A. Greater tuberosity osteolysis following calcific supraspinatus tendinitis can be addressed by arthroscopic débridement and single-row rotator cuff repair: a case report. JSES Rev Rep Tech 2023; 3:242-246. [PMID: 37588427 PMCID: PMC10426495 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Soheil Sabzevari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shaquille Charles
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rajiv P. Reddy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew J. Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Janina Kaarre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amitesh Prasad
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Albert Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Domb BG, Curley AJ. Editorial Commentary: Treatment of Concomitant Intra-Articular Pathology in Patients With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome Is Indicated by Provocative Impingement or Instability Physical Examination and Ultrasound-Guided Analgesic Injection Testing. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:865-867. [PMID: 36740302 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic surgery can be used to address peritrochanteric pathology in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. During management of these patients, surgeons must decide whether adjunctive hip arthroscopy to treat concomitant intra-articular pathology (such as labral tears or chondral lesions) is required, because the prevalence of intra-articular findings may be greater than the clinical significance. A thorough history and physical examination can help distinguish whether the symptoms are arising from a peritrochanteric issue (e.g., gluteal tendinopathy, trochanteric bursitis, external coxa saltans) versus an intra-articular pain generator. Increased symptoms with provocative impingement or instability testing indicate adjunctive hip arthroscopy to address intra-articular abnormalities. In addition, an ultrasound-guided analgesic injection into the hip joint or peritrochanteric region may aid in diagnosis. A patient with partial symptomatic relief from separate injections into both areas is a classic presentation and consistent with a mixed-picture of peritrochanteric and intra-articular pathology, which may be addressed with a combined endoscopic and arthroscopic approach.
Collapse
|
12
|
Curley AJ, Padmanabhan S, Chishti Z, Parsa A, Jimenez AE, Domb BG. Periacetabular Osteotomy in Athletes With Symptomatic Hip Dysplasia Allows for Participation in Low-, Moderate-, and High-Impact Sports, With Greater Than 70% Return to Sport for Competitive Athletes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:868-880. [PMID: 36528217 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review the literature and report the rate of return to sport (RTS) in athletes following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for symptomatic hip dysplasia. METHODS A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for clinical studies reporting on athletes undergoing PAO surgery for symptomatic hip dysplasia. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) grading system. Data collection included study characteristics, demographics, radiographic measurements, rate and timing of RTS, baseline and most recent patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and subsequent surgeries. RESULTS Six studies met inclusion criteria with 341 patients undergoing PAO. There were 2 level III and 4 level IV studies, with an average MINORS score of 11. Preoperative and postoperative lateral center edge angles ranged from 8° to 18° and 23° to 41.3°, respectively. One study reported solely on dancers with a 63% rate of RTS at 1 year postoperatively. Two other studies reported RTS of 80% and 82% for multiple sports, with slightly lower rates (73% and 78%) in competitive athletes. Three studies demonstrated a comparable distribution of sports participation, from the preoperative to postoperative period, in low-impact (61.4% to 72.1% and 63.7% to 85.7%), moderate-impact (10.3% to 21.0% and 4.3% to 25.4%), and high-impact (8.5% to 17.6% and 5.1% to 10.8%) sports. Three studies reported time to RTS after PAO, ranging from 8.8 to 12.8 months. Of the 3 studies noting reasons for not returning to sport, concerns related to the operative hip ranged from 36.4% to 67%. Of the studies that reported both preoperative and postoperative PROs, improvements in all values were observed, with modified Harris Hip Scores and Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores at most recent follow-up ranging from 81 to 95 and 72 to 93, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In athletes with symptomatic hip dysplasia undergoing PAO, postoperative participation in low-, moderate-, and high-impact sports was observed, with greater than 70% RTS for competitive athletes. These findings suggest that PAO, with appropriate indications, is an efficacious treatment option in this active patient population with severe dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | | | - Zayd Chishti
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Ali Parsa
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Andrew E Jimenez
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Curley AJ, Padmanabhan S, Prabhavalkar ON, Perez-Padilla PA, Maldonado DR, Domb BG. Durable Outcomes After Hip Labral Reconstruction at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2023:S0749-8063(23)00182-2. [PMID: 36828155 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review and report the mid- to long-term patient reported outcomes (PROs) following hip labral reconstruction. METHODS A literature search of the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for clinical studies reporting mid- to long-term PROs at minimum five year follow-up following arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) grading system. Data collection included study characteristics, demographics, indications, radiographic metrics, perioperative findings, surgical technique, baseline and most recent PROs, and subsequent surgeries. RESULTS Four studies met inclusion criteria, with 182 hips (age range, 27.9 to 38.7 years) undergoing labral reconstruction in primary and revision hip surgery with minimum five year follow-up. There were three level III studies and one level IV study, with an average MINORS score of 16.6. All studies cited labral tissue characteristics as a factor for surgical indications, including the quality and/or size of the labrum. Three studies performed segmental labral reconstructions, while another study utilized a circumferential technique. Varying grafts were selected, including hamstring autograft/allograft, ligamentum teres autograft, iliotibial band autograft, and tensor fascia lata autograft. All studies demonstrated improved PROs from baseline to most recent follow-up, with four studies reporting modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) values that increased from baseline (range, 58.9 to 66.8) to most recent follow-up (range, 80.1 to 86.3). After labral reconstruction, rates of revision arthroscopy ranged from 4.8% to 13.3% and conversion to total hip arthroplasty ranged from 1.6% to 27%. CONCLUSION Improved PROs were observed in all studies at minimum 5-year follow-up, suggesting that labral reconstruction can offer durable results beyond short-term follow-up. While surgical indications for all studies included labral tissue characteristics, differing graft selection and surgical techniques were utilized across studies, limiting the ability to determine an optimal treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL 60018
| | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL 60018; American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL 60018.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Curley AJ, Nerys-Figueroa J, George T, Carbone AD, Parsa A, Domb BG. Patient-Reported Outcomes Improve at 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:476-487. [PMID: 36343765 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide an updated review of recent literature on postoperative outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), focusing on larger-population studies with a minimum 2-year follow-up published within the last 5 years. METHODS A literature search of the PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were screened for clinical studies published from 2017 to 2022 with greater than 100 patients and minimum 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included failure to report postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), no preoperative radiographic measurements, and surgery for pathology other than FAIS. Data collection included study characteristics, patient demographics, radiographic findings, intraoperative findings, procedures performed, postoperative PROs, and subsequent surgeries. RESULTS Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Mean or median patient ages ranged from 32.3 to 41 years, with 4 studies reporting on greater than 50% female patients. Mean preoperative lateral center edge angles and alpha angles ranged from 30.2° to 37° and from 56.2° to 71°, respectively. Labral repairs (range 69.7%-100%) were performed more commonly than debridements (range 0%-26.3%). All studies demonstrated improved PROs at most recent follow-up. Seven studies reported mean or median modified Harris Hip Scores, with preoperative and postoperative values that ranged from 53.1 to 80 and from 67.4 to 100, respectively. Revision hip arthroscopies and conversions to hip arthroplasty ranged from 0.8% to 11.6% and from 0% to 34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS All included studies found improvements in PROs after hip arthroscopy for FAIS at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty is most common in older patients at minimum 10-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | | | - Tracy George
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Andrew D Carbone
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Ali Parsa
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carbone AD, Prabhavalkar O, Chishti Z, Curley AJ, Parsa A, Domb BG. Hip Capsular Repair Results in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes and Survivorship: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:488-497. [PMID: 36395962 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether routine capsular closure following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in patients without dysplasia results in improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and increased survivorship rates. METHODS A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for clinical studies reporting PROs following arthroscopic hip labral repair for FAI. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies grading system. Inclusion criteria consisted of comparative clinical studies investigating routine capsular closure with nonclosure in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears. Exclusion criteria included non-English language, minimum follow-up of less than 2 years after surgery, technique articles, case reports, noncomparative case series of fewer than 10 patients, failure to report surgical technique, absence of postoperative PROs, or partial repair. Data collection included study characteristics, demographics, indications, radiographic metrics, perioperative findings, surgical technique, baseline and most recent PROs, and subsequent surgeries. RESULTS A total of 531 articles were reviewed, of which 3 were included with 249 hips that underwent capsular repair and 157 hips that underwent capsulotomy with no repair. There were 2 Level III studies and 1 Level II study, with an average The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies score of 16.7. All studies cited FAI and labral tear as an indication for surgery. All studies demonstrated improved PROs from baseline to most recent follow-up. Postoperatively, the repair group reported modified Harris Hip Score values ranging from 80.8 to 87, whereas the nonrepair group reported scores ranging from 76 to 81.7. In addition, the repair group reported postoperative Hip Outcome Score - Sports-Specific Subscale values ranging from 68.1 to 9, whereas the nonrepair group reported scores ranging from 65.3 to 76.1. The studies also reported minimal clinically important difference for modified Harris Hip Score, with the repair group reporting percentages ranging from 71 to 100 and the nonrepair group reporting percentages ranging from 52 to 95.6. All 3 studies also observed a lower rate of hip survivorship in the nonrepair group, ranging from 94.6 to 100 in the repair group and 90.8 to 100 in the nonrepair group. There were no significant differences in the rate of revision arthroscopy between groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients without dysplasia who undergo capsular repair have greater improvements in PROs and greater survivorship rates at early- and mid-term follow-up than patients who do not undergo capsular repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, systematic review of level II and III studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Carbone
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | | | - Zayd Chishti
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Ali Parsa
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kufta AY, Maldonado DR, Go CC, Curley AJ, Padilla P, Domb BG. Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement for Hip Arthroscopy Fell by 21.1% on Average Between 2011 and 2022. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 5:e67-e73. [PMID: 36866284 PMCID: PMC9971874 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine Medicare reimbursement for hip arthroscopy from 2011 to 2022. Methods The seven most common procedures performed with hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon were gathered. The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was utilized to access financial data of the associated Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The reimbursement data for each CPT were gathered from the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. With the consumer price index database and inflation calculator, reimbursement values were adjusted for inflation to 2022 U.S. dollars. Results Following an adjustment for inflation, it was found that reimbursement rate for hip arthroscopy procedures on average was 21.1% lower between 2011 and 2022. The average reimbursement per CPT code for the included codes was $899.21 in 2022 compared to inflation adjusted $1,141.45 in 2011, a difference of $242.24. Conclusions From 2011 to 2022, the average inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement has steadily declined for the most common hip arthroscopy procedures. As Medicare is one of the largest insurance payers, these results have substantial financial and clinical implications for orthopaedic surgeons, policy makers, and patients. Level of Evidence Level IV, economic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Y. Kufta
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - David R. Maldonado
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Cammille C. Go
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Andrew J. Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Paulo Padilla
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin G. Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.,American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.,AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois,Address correspondence to Dr. Benjamin G. Domb, 999 E Touhy Ave., Suite 450, Des Plaines, IL 60018, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Keeling LE, Curley AJ, Kaarre J, Joly JM, West RV. Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction. Video Journal of Sports Medicine 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/26350254221132570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background: Recurrentlateral patellar dislocation is a devastating condition associated with different pathologies, including medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury, increased tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and trochlear dysplasia. This video aims to provide an overview of isolated MPFL reconstruction in a patient with recurrent patellar dislocation and chronic MPFL injury. Indications: Isolated MPFL reconstruction is indicated for patients with recurrent lateral patellar instability following an initial trial of nonoperative management, in the absence of other contributing anatomic factors. Candidates for isolated MPFL reconstruction should have a TT-TG distance of <20 mm, and normal or Dejour type A trochlear morphology. Technique Description: Semitendinosus allograft is used to reconstruct the torn or attenuated MPFL. Following diagnostic arthroscopy, an incision is made over the medial border of the patella and dissection is carried through the skin and subcutaneous tissue to the fascia. Two K-wires are over-drilled and two 3.5-mm Arthrex SwiveLock anchors are placed. The allograft is prepared and whipstitched on both sides. The central portion of the graft is tide down to the anchors. A second incision is then made on the medial side of the knee over the epicondyle. Dissection is carried down to the fascia, and palpation is used to identify Schottles’ point. This is confirmed with fluoroscopy. An 8-mm drill bit is then used to drill to a depth of 60 mm on the femoral side. The grafts are passed one at a time through the femoral tunnel. The femoral side is fixed with an Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw and the incisions are subsequently irrigated and closed in a layered fashion. Results: MPFL reconstruction demonstrates good functional and clinical outcomes with high rates of patient satisfaction and low rates of failure. A recent systematic review demonstrated an 84% rate of return to sport, improved postoperative outcomes, and pooled risks of recurrent instability and reoperation of less than 5% following isolated MPFL reconstruction. Conclusion: Isolated MPFL reconstruction should be considered for patients with recurrent patellar instability in the absence of other clinical risk factors. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E. Keeling
- Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Inova, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew J. Curley
- Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Inova, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Janina Kaarre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Robin V. West
- Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Inova, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Curley AJ, Setliff JC, Greiner JJ, Keeling LE, Mauro CS. Comprehensive Open Management of Buttock/Ischiofemoral Symptoms: The COMBIS Procedure for Posterior Hip Pain. Video Journal of Sports Medicine 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/26350254221129627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background: Posterior hip and buttock pain can arise from several overlapping but distinct etiologies. Ischiofemoral impingement, sciatic neuropathy, and proximal hamstring tendinopathy, occurring alone or in combination, have been implicated as precipitants. However, diagnosis and management of underlying pathology can be challenging, as few diagnostic modalities reliably differentiate between these etiologies and surgeon decision-making may be complicated by uncertainty over which pathology to address. Indications: Posterior hip and buttock pain which occurs in a sciatic nerve distribution and is refractory to conservative measures (eg, physical therapy, analgesics, and activity modification) raises suspicion for 1 or several of the above pathologies. A combined procedure to address all 3—ischiofemoral decompression, sciatic neurolysis, and proximal hamstring repair—is described here. Technique Description: The patient is placed prone on a radiolucent table. An incision is made, and dissection is taken down through the superficial layers of the buttock, gluteal fascia, and fascia overlying the proximal hamstring tendons. The sciatic nerve is identified, mobilized, and lysed using blunt dissection. The fascia overlying the ischium is incised and the tendinous insertion decorticated with rongeur. Two anchors are placed, and sutures are passed through the proximal hamstring tendon in mattress fashion. An incision is made in line with the external rotators and dissection is taken down to the lesser trochanter. The lesser trochanter is identified, and osteotomy performed, with mobilization and removal of the resected fragment. The interval in the external rotators is closed with interrupted suture. Results: This is an uncommon procedure with little data on patient outcomes. Nonetheless, it is effective for relief of symptoms related to the pathologies enumerated above. Keys to success include careful diagnosis and comfort with surgical technique. Conclusion: The COMBIS procedure simultaneously addresses 3 common etiologies of posterior hip and buttock pain. Although it is important to conduct a thorough diagnostic evaluation to rule out imitators, patients with symptoms due to ischiofemoral impingement, sciatic neuropathy, proximal hamstring tendinopathy, or combination thereof may experience good relief of symptoms with appropriate application of this technique. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua C. Setliff
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin J. Greiner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura E. Keeling
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Craig S. Mauro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zsidai B, Engler ID, Pujol O, Lucidi GA, Curley AJ, Zaffagnini S, Musahl V. Over-The-Top Technique for Revision ACL Reconstruction with Achilles Allograft and Associated Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis. Arthrosc Tech 2022; 11:e1633-e1640. [PMID: 36185109 PMCID: PMC9520075 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is made challenging by the frequent presence of rotatory instability, tunnel malpositioning and widening, and limited autograft options. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), alternative tunnel routing, and the use of allograft tissue can be used to manage these challenges. This Technical Note describes revision ACL-R using the over-the-top (OTT) technique with Achilles tendon allograft with concomitant LET. The surgical approach involves routing the graft around the posterior aspect of the lateral femoral condyle, and then deep to the iliotibial band to a site just medial to Gerdy's tubercle, with staple fixation on the lateral femur for the ACL-R and anterolateral tibia for the LET. The OTT technique with LET provides a versatile approach for the management of failed ACL-R by circumventing challenges in revision ACL-R and addressing rotatory instability, a contributing factor to prior graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bálint Zsidai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.,Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Address correspondence to Bálint Zsidai, M.D., Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Ian D. Engler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, U.S.A
| | - Oriol Pujol
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gian Andrea Lucidi
- Clinica II, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, IRCCS Via Pupilli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrew J. Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, U.S.A
| | - Stefano Zaffagnini
- Clinica II, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, IRCCS Via Pupilli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.,Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Curley AJ, Ruh ER, Shah A, Disantis AE, Krivoniak A, Mauro CS, McClincy MP. A systematic approach to CT evaluation of non-arthritic hip pain. EFORT Open Rev 2022; 7:653-662. [PMID: 36125004 PMCID: PMC9624481 DOI: 10.1530/eor-22-0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone morphology has been increasingly recognized as a significant variable in the evaluation of non-arthritic hip pain in young adults. Increased availability and use of multidetector CT in this patient population has contributed to better characterization of the osseous structures compared to traditional radiographs. Femoral and acetabular version, sites of impingement, acetabular coverage, femoral head–neck morphology, and other structural abnormalities are increasingly identified with the use of CT scan. In this review, a standard CT imaging technique and protocol is discussed, along with a systematic approach for evaluating pelvic CT imaging in patients with non-arthritic hip pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ethan R Ruh
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amisha Shah
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashley E Disantis
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - April Krivoniak
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Craig S Mauro
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael P McClincy
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Curley AJ, Engler ID, Ruh ER, Mauro CS, McClincy MP. Periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy demonstrates improved outcomes in a heterogenous patient population: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 31:2090-2102. [PMID: 35974192 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07108-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the literature on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy (PAO-FHA) for (1) patient demographics and hip morphology, (2) changes in preoperative to postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and (3) PROs in comparison to primary periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) patients. METHODS A systematic literature search of Pubmed, CINAHL/Medline, and cochrane databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The search phrase was "(periacetabular osteotomy or PAO or rotational osteotomy) and (hip arthroscopy or arthroscopic)". The titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened for studies on PAO-FHA. Study quality was assessed, and relevant data were collected. A meta-analysis was not performed due to study heterogeneity. RESULTS The search identified 7 studies, including 151 hips (148 patients, 93.9% female) undergoing PAO-FHA, out of an initial 593 studies, with three Level IV and four Level III studies. Mean time from hip arthroscopy to PAO ranged from 17.0 to 29.6 months. Heterogenous hip morphologies and radiologic findings prior to PAO were observed, though patients most frequently demonstrated moderate-to-severe dysplasia (mean or median lateral center edge angle < 20°) and minimal osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 0 or 1). In all 5 studies that reported concomitant procedures with PAO, femoral and/or acetabular osteoplasty was performed via arthroscopy or arthrotomy. Following PAO-FHA, radiographic acetabular coverage and PROs improved in all 6 studies that reported postoperative outcomes. All four comparative studies of primary PAO vs. PAO-FHA included patients with mean or median LCEAs < 20°, reporting mixed outcomes for the optimal treatment approach. CONCLUSION PAO-FHA is reported in a heterogenous patient population that frequently includes hips with moderate-to-severe dysplasia and minimal osteoarthritis. Regardless of hip morphology or concomitant procedures, all studies that reported postoperative outcomes demonstrated improved PROs following PAO-FHA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. .,American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Ian D Engler
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Ethan R Ruh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Craig S Mauro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Michael P McClincy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jimenez AE, Monahan PF, Owens JS, Maldonado DR, Curley AJ, Domb BG, Lall AC, Domb BG. Earlier Treatment Yields Superior Outcomes in Competitive Athletes Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2022; 38:2183-2191. [PMID: 34915141 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) and return to sport (RTS) for competitive athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome within 1 year of symptom onset and to compare these results with a propensity-matched control group of competitive athletes with symptoms for over 1 year. METHODS Data on professional, collegiate, high-school, and organized amateur athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopy within 1 year of symptom onset between April 2008 and November 2017 were collected. RTS and minimum 2-year PROs were collected for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog pain scale (VAS). Rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also evaluated. These patients were propensity-matched to a control group of competitive athletes with symptoms for over one year for comparison. RESULTS Fifty competitive athletes (51 hips, 54.9% female) were included in the study group with a mean follow-up of 70.9 ± 29.1 months and age of 23.6 ± 11.3 years. They demonstrated significant improvement from preoperative to latest follow-up for all recorded PROs (P < .001) and RTS at a rate of 72.9%. When outcomes were compared to the control group, the study group demonstrated similar preoperative scores for all PROs but significantly better minimum 2-year postoperative scores for NAHS (93.8 vs 85.1, P = .0001), HOS-SSS (89.1 vs 77.2, P = .001), iHOT-12 (87.7 vs 76.4, P = 0.011), and VAS (1.5 vs 2.4, P = 0.027). Rates of achieving MCID for HOS-SSS and mHHS were comparable between groups. Further, RTS rates were similar between groups (P = .301). CONCLUSION Competitive athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with symptoms for less than 1 year demonstrated superior 2-year PROs compared to a propensity-matched control group with symptoms for over 1 year, but the rates achieving MCID and RTS were similar between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter F Monahan
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jade S Owens
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, U.S.A..
| | - Ajay C Lall
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL 60018; American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL 60018; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, IL 60169
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL 60018; American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL 60018; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, IL 60169.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gabrielli AS, Tisherman RT, Curley AJ, Mauro CS, Arner JW. Open Ischiofemoral Impingement Decompression. Arthrosc Tech 2022; 11:e1149-e1155. [PMID: 35936857 PMCID: PMC9353069 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Ischiofemoral impingement is a relatively rare cause of posterior hip pain associated with narrowing of the space between the lateral aspect of the ischium and the lesser trochanter. Symptoms typically consist of lower buttock, groin, and/or medial thigh pain, which is commonly exacerbated by adduction, extension, and external rotation of the hip. This condition can be treated nonoperatively in many circumstances; however, recalcitrant cases may require surgical intervention. Whereas described operative treatment options for this pathology range from endoscopic to open procedures, this Technical Note describes a safe and reliable technique for open ischiofemoral decompression with sciatic nerve neurolysis through a posterior approach for treatment of ischiofemoral impingement refractory to conservative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra S. Gabrielli
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Robert T. Tisherman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Andrew J. Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Craig S. Mauro
- Burke and Bradley Orthopedics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Justin W. Arner
- Burke and Bradley Orthopedics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.,Address correspondence to Justin W. Arner, M.D., Burke and Bradley Orthopedics, UPMC St Margaret, 200 Medical Arts Bldg, Ste 4010, 200 Delafield Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15215, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nazzal EM, Zsidai B, Pujol O, Kaarre J, Curley AJ, Musahl V. Considerations of the Posterior Tibial Slope in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2022; 15:291-299. [PMID: 35653051 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09767-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The significance of posterior tibial slope (PTS) in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction has been increasingly recognized in recent years. The purpose of this article is to review the biomechanical and clinical studies of PTS in conjunction with ACL injuries, providing an evidence-based approach for the evaluation and management of this patient population. RECENT FINDINGS Several biomechanical and clinical studies suggest that PTS > 12° may be considered with increased strain on the native ACL fibers (or reconstructed graft) and greater anterior tibial translation, predisposing patients to a recurrent ACL injury. The increased rates of ACL injury and graft failure seen in those with increased PTS have garnered attention to diagnose and surgically address increased PTS in the revision ACL setting; however, the role of a slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in primary ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) has yet to be defined. Various HTO techniques to decrease PTS during revision ACL-R have demonstrated promising outcomes, though conclusions are limited by the multifactorial nature of revision surgery and concomitant procedures performed. Recent evidence suggests that increased PTS is a risk factor for failure following ACL-R, which may be mitigated by a slope-reducing HTO. Further investigation is needed to elucidate abnormal PTS values and to determine appropriate indications for a slope-reducing HTO in primary ACL-R.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehab M Nazzal
- UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
| | - Bálint Zsidai
- UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Oriol Pujol
- UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.,Orthopedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Janina Kaarre
- UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andrew J Curley
- UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA
| | - Volker Musahl
- UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Maldonado DR, Fox JD, Kyin C, Jimenez AE, Saks BR, Curley AJ, Lall AC, Domb BG. Maximal Outcome Improvement Willingness Thresholds Are Predictive of a Patient’s Willingness to Undergo the Same Surgery, in Retrospect, Given the Known Outcome of Their Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 4:e1007-e1013. [PMID: 35747669 PMCID: PMC9210379 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the percent maximal outcome improvement willingness thresholds (MOWTs) for the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain that were associated with a patient’s willingness to undergo surgery, in retrospect, given the known outcome of their primary hip arthroscopy with concomitant endoscopy for gluteus medius (GM) tear repair. Methods An anchor question was provided to patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with concomitant endoscopic GM tear repair between April 2008 to April 2020. Patients were included if they answered the anchor question and had baseline and postoperative minimum 1-year follow-up scores for the NAHS and VAS. Patients were excluded if they had a previous ipsilateral hip surgery, Tönnis grade >1, hip dysplasia, previous hip conditions, or a preoperative score that was already at the maximum value for the NAHS and VAS scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the MOWT. Significance was indicated by a P value <.05. Results A total of 107 patients (107 hips) were included, with 101 (94.4%) females and 6 (5.6%) males. The average age and body mass index was 56.20 ± 9.88 years and 28.80 ± 4.92 kg/m2, respectively. The average follow-up time was 54.89 ± 29.52 months. The ROC analysis determined that the MOWT for the mHHS and VAS were 54.7%, and 62.6%, respectively. The probability of a patient being willing to undergo surgery again if they met the MOWT was 85.8% and 85.6% for the NAHS and VAS, respectively. Conclusion The MOWTs that were predictive of willingness to undergo surgery again following primary hip arthroscopy with concomitant endoscopy for GM tear repair were 54.7% and 62.6% for the NAHS, and VAS, respectively. Clinical Relevance Outcome assessment has been a point of increasing emphasis in hip preservation surgery. Having a tool to measure whether patients would go through the process of surgery again knowing their current outcome status is important to understanding outcomes after surgery.
Collapse
|
26
|
Engler ID, Ahrendt GM, Curley AJ, Musahl V. Surgeon Personality, Time Spent With the Patient, and Quality of Facilities Are the Most Important Factors to Patients in Selecting an Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeon. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 4:e1023-e1029. [PMID: 35747634 PMCID: PMC9210365 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the most important factors to patients across the United States in selecting an orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon. Methods In this cross-sectional survey study, adult U.S. residents were surveyed using Amazon Mechanical Turk, a validated survey tool. Data included demographics and the relative importance of both pre-office and in-office factors that determine how patients select an orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon. Results were compiled, and factors were compared by patient demographics. Results Of 1,074 respondents, 56.3% were male, and 60.0% were 25 to 40 years old. Responses were geographically diverse. The most important factors in selecting a sports medicine surgeon (graded on a 0-10 scale) were surgeon professionalism and personality (6.6), quality of the hospital/office facilities (6.4), and how much time the surgeon spends with the patient (6.4). Each of these in-office factors were more important than pre-office factors, the most important of which were reputation of the surgeon’s hospital or group (6.3), surgeon’s reviews on medical review websites (6.2), and surgeon’s educational background (6.0). The least important factors were surgeon’s sex (3.7), marketing of the surgeon (4.2), and surgeon’s social media accounts (4.3). A social media account was taken into consideration at least “a little” by nearly two-thirds of respondents. The most preferred surgeon personality was a balance of professional and lighthearted (66.9%), with strictly professional (27.6%) or largely lighthearted (5.6%) less preferred. Conclusions The most important factors to patients in selecting their orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon, regardless of patient sex, race, or geography, are related to the patient’s in-office experience, including surgeon’s professionalism/personality, how much time the surgeon spends with the patient, and quality of the hospital/office facilities. Surgeons should consider prioritizing a professional office environment and taking the time to get to know patients for the benefit of their patients and their practice. Clinical Relevance The market for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons is competitive. It is important to know what qualities of a surgeon and his or her practice are important to patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee MS, Jimenez AE, Owens JS, Curley AJ, Paraschos OA, Maldonado DR, Lall AC, Domb BG. Comparison of Outcomes Between Nonsmokers and Patients Who Discontinued Smoking 1 Month Before Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Propensity-Matched Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221097372. [PMID: 35693458 PMCID: PMC9185012 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221097372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cigarette smoking has been shown to negatively affect outcomes after hip
arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). The effect of
cessation of cigarette smoking before surgery has not been well
established. Purposes: (1) To report minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of former
smokers who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS and (2) to compare
these results with those of a propensity-matched control group of
nonsmokers. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were collected for all patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy
for FAIS between December 2008 and November 2017. Patients were eligible if
they indicated that they had previously smoked cigarettes but had quit
smoking at least 1 month before surgery and had minimum 2-year postoperative
outcomes for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score
(NAHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The percentage of hips
achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were recorded.
The study group was then propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, and
body mass index (BMI) to patients who had never smoked. Results: A total of 83 former-smoking patients (84 hips; age, 45.0 ± 13.5 years) were
included at a median follow-up of 38.6 months (interquartile range,
27.5-48.2 months); all patients had stopped smoking at a mean ± standard
deviation of 14.3 ± 24.5 months preoperatively. Former smokers demonstrated
significant improvement from preoperatively to the minimum 2-year follow-up
for all recorded PROs (P < .001 for all) and achieved
the MCID for the mHHS, NAHS, and VAS at favorable rates (75.0%-81.6%).
Logistic regression analysis did not identify a significant relationship
between cessation time and rates of achieving MCID for mHHS, NAHS, or VAS.
When compared with 84 never-smokers (84 hips), the former smokers
demonstrated similar preoperative scores, postoperative scores, and
improvement on all recorded PROs (P > .05 for all). Both
groups achieved MCID for mHHS, NAHS, and VAS at similar rates and
demonstrated similar rates of revision surgery. Conclusion: Former smokers who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS demonstrated
significant improvement in PROs at minimum 2-year follow-up. When compared
with a propensity-matched control group of never-smokers, they achieved
similar postoperative PROs and rates of achieving psychometric
thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Lee
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrew E Jimenez
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jade S Owens
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrew J Curley
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Ajay C Lall
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Looney AM, McCann JA, Connolly PT, Comfort SM, Curley AJ, Postma WF. Routine Capsular Closure With Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Results in Superior Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:2007-2022. [PMID: 34403279 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211023508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In hip arthroscopic surgery, capsulotomy is performed to improve visualization and allow instrumentation of the joint. Traditionally, the defect has been left unrepaired; however, increasing evidence suggests that this may contribute to persistent pain and iatrogenic capsular instability. Nevertheless, the clinical benefit of performing routine capsular repair remains controversial. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of routine capsular closure on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), hypothesizing that superior PROs would be observed with routine capsular closure. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The terms "hip,""arthroscopy,""capsule,""capsular,""repair," and "closure" were used to query Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), SPORTDiscus, and PubMed. Articles with PROs stratified by capsular management were included. Multivariate mixed-effects metaregression models were implemented with study-level random-effects and fixed-effects moderators for capsular closure versus no repair and after controlling for surgical indication and preoperative PROs. The effect of repair on both the postoperative score and the change in scores was evaluated via the Harris Hip Score (HHS)/modified HHS (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and HOS-Sport Specific Subscale (SSS), with a supplemental analysis of additional outcomes. RESULTS Of 432 initial articles, 36 were eligible for analysis, with results for 5132 hip arthroscopic procedures. The capsule was repaired in 3427 arthroscopic procedures and unrepaired in 1705. Capsular repair was associated with significantly higher postoperative HHS/mHHS (2.011; SE, 0.743 [95% CI, 0.554-3.467]; P = .007), HOS-ADL (3.635; SE, 0.873 [95% CI, 1.923-5.346]; P < .001), and HOS-SSS (4.137; SE, 1.205 [95% CI, 1.775-6.499]; P < .001) scores as well as significantly superior improvement on the HHS/mHHS (2.571; SE, 0.878 [95% CI, 0.849-4.292]; P = .003), HOS-ADL (3.315; SE, 1.131 [95% CI, 1.099-5.531]; P = .003), and HOS-SSS (3.605; SE, 1.689 [95% CI, 0.295-6.915]; P = .033). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis is the largest to date evaluating the effect of capsular closure on PROs and demonstrates significantly higher mean postoperative scores and significantly superior improvement with repair, while controlling for the effects of preoperative score and surgical indication. The true magnitude of the benefit of capsular repair may be clarified by large prospective randomized studies using PRO measures specifically targeted and validated for hip arthroscopic surgery/preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin M Looney
- Division of Sports Medicine, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Julia A McCann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William F Postma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Curley AJ, Stack MJ, Ruh E, Gibson B, Anderson KA, Vyas D. Return to Ballet Progression for Dancers After Hip Arthroscopy for Instability or Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 2022:00042752-990000000-00075. [PMID: 36976716 DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000001111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Ballet dancers may be predisposed to hip injuries because of the unique demands placed on the hips during dance training and performance. Hip arthroscopy can be used to address several of these symptomatic disorders, including hip instability and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). After hip arthroscopy, ballet dancers undergo a rehabilitation program to allow for healing, range of motion restoration, and progressive strengthening. Once patients complete the standard postoperative therapy program, a paucity of information is available to guide dancers back to the advanced hip movements involved in ballet. Therefore, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to present a stepwise rehabilitation protocol with return to ballet progression for dancers undergoing hip arthroscopy for instability or FAIS. Particular emphasis is placed on movement-specific exercises for ballet performers, and objective clinical metrics, to guide return to dance progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- UPMC Department of Orthopedics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Ethan Ruh
- UPMC Department of Orthopedics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Brittany Gibson
- UPMC Department of Orthopedics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Pittsburgh Ballet Theater, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kelley A Anderson
- UPMC Department of Orthopedics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Pittsburgh Ballet Theater, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Dharmesh Vyas
- UPMC Department of Orthopedics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ehlers CB, Curley AJ, Fackler NP, Minhas A, Rodriguez AN, Pasko K, Chang ES. The Statistical Fragility of Single-Bundle vs Double-Bundle Autografts for ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 9:23259671211064626. [PMID: 34988239 PMCID: PMC8721389 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211064626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The statistical significance of a given study outcome can be liable to small changes in findings. P values are common, but imperfect statistical methods to convey significance, and inclusion of the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) may provide a clearer perception of statistical strength. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to examine the statistical stability of studies comparing primary single-bundle to double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) utilizing autograft and independent tunnel drilling. It was hypothesized that the study findings would be vulnerable to a small number of outcome event reversals, often less than the number of patients lost to follow-up. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the authors searched PubMed for comparative studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in select journals, based on impact factor, between 2005 and 2020. Risk-of-bias assessment and methodology scoring were conducted for the included studies. A total of 48 dichotomous outcome measures were examined for possible event reversals. The FI for each outcome was determined by the number of event reversals necessary to alter significance. The FQ was calculated by dividing the FI by the respective sample size. Results: Of the 1794 studies screened, 15 comparative studies were included for analysis; 13 studies were RCTs. Overall, the mean FI and FQ were 3.14 (IQR, 2-4) and 0.050 (IQR, 0.032-0.062), respectively. For 72.9% of outcomes, the FI was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Studies comparing single-bundle versus double-bundle ACLR may not be as statistically stable as previously thought. Comparative studies and RCTs are at substantial risk for statistical fragility, with few event reversals required to alter significance. The reversal of fewer than 4 outcome events in a treatment group can alter the statistical significance of a given result; this is commonly less than the number of patients lost to follow-up. Future comparative study analyses might consider including FI and FQ with P values in their statistical analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cooper B Ehlers
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, El Segundo, California, USA
| | | | - Nathan P Fackler
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, El Segundo, California, USA
| | - Arjun Minhas
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, El Segundo, California, USA
| | - Ariel N Rodriguez
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, El Segundo, California, USA
| | - Kory Pasko
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, El Segundo, California, USA
| | - Edward S Chang
- Inova Medical Group Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Curley AJ, Conroy CM, West RV, Chang ES. Postoperative Use of Blood Flow Restriction in Orthopedics. Orthopedics 2021; 44:e694-e698. [PMID: 34618631 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20211001-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy is being used more frequently for rehabilitation from orthopedic injuries. Several physiologic mechanisms of action, at local and systemic levels, have been proposed. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of BFR training in healthy athletes; however, limited clinical data exist supporting the use of BFR after surgery. Given that BFR training may facilitate muscle development using low-load resistance exercises, it offers a unique advantage for the post-surgical patient who cannot tolerate traditional high resistance training. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):e694-e698.].
Collapse
|
32
|
Keeling LE, Looney AM, Curley AJ, Ehlers CB, Galel AM, Khalafallah YM, Vippa TK, Bryant BJ, Chang ES. Early Versus Delayed Active Range of Motion After Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211026619. [PMID: 34458384 PMCID: PMC8392820 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211026619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known regarding the effect of early active elbow range of motion (ROM) protocols on failure rates and outcomes after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Hypothesis We hypothesized that patients managed using an early active ROM protocol after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis would demonstrate similar failure rates and functional outcomes compared to patients managed using a traditional delayed active ROM protocol. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods We evaluated 63 patients who underwent open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation. Based on surgeon preference, 22 patients were managed using an early active motion protocol consisting of no restrictions on elbow flexion or forearm supination, while 41 patients were managed using a delayed motion protocol postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included failure of biceps tenodesis and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Secondary outcomes included shoulder and elbow ROM at 6 months postoperatively. Results The mean follow-up for the 63 patients was 24.2 months postoperatively. One patient (2.4%) in the delayed active motion cohort and no patients in the early active motion cohort experienced failure. Final outcome scores as well as 6-month shoulder and elbow ROM indicated excellent functional outcomes, with no significant difference between motion cohorts. The median postoperative ASES scores were 97.99 in the early active motion cohort (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 95.49 ± 7.68) and 95.42 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 90.93 ± 16.08), while median postoperative SANE scores were 96 in the early motion cohort (mean ± SD, 94.23 ± 6.68) and 95 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 88.39 ± 17.98). Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference in outcome scores based on the performance of concomitant rotator cuff repair or hand dominance. Conclusion Early active ROM after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation resulted in low failure rates and excellent clinical outcomes, comparable to the results of patients managed using delayed active ROM protocols. This suggests that patients undergoing open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may be managed using either early or delayed active motion protocols without compromising functional outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Keeling
- Department of Orthopaedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Austin M Looney
- Department of Orthopaedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopaedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Cooper B Ehlers
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alexandra M Galel
- Department of Orthopaedics, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Tarun K Vippa
- Department of Orthopaedics, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Brandon J Bryant
- Department of Orthopaedics, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Edward S Chang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ehlers CB, Curley AJ, Fackler NP, Minhas A, Chang ES. The Statistical Fragility of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:2827-2833. [PMID: 33211555 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520969973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based medicine utilizes data to inform clinical decision making, despite the ability of a small number of outcome reversals to change statistical significance. P values are common measurements of statistical significance that possess inherent flaws. The inclusion of the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) may provide a clearer conveyance of statistical strength. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose was to examine the statistical stability of studies comparing hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with independent tunnel drilling. We hypothesized that the findings of these studies are vulnerable to a small number of outcome event reversals, often fewer than the number of patients lost to follow-up. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS Comparative studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 10 leading orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2020 were analyzed. Statistical significance was defined as a P value ≤.05. FI for each outcome was determined by the number of event reversals necessary to alter significance. FQ was calculated by dividing the FI by the respective sample size. RESULTS Of the 1803 studies screened, 643 met initial search criteria, with 18 comparative studies ultimately included for analysis, 8 of which were RCTs. A total of 114 outcomes were examined. Overall, the mean (interquartile range) FI and FQ were 3.77 (2-4) and 0.040 (0.016-0.055), respectively. The FI was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up for 76.3% of outcomes. CONCLUSION Studies examining graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not be as statistically stable as previously thought. Comparative studies and RCTs are at substantial risk for statistical fragility, with few event reversals required to alter significance. The reversal of <4 outcome events in a treatment group can alter the statistical significance of a given result; this is commonly fewer than the number of patients lost to follow-up. Future comparative study analyses might consider including FI and FQ with P values in their statistical analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cooper B Ehlers
- School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Arjun Minhas
- School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Edward S Chang
- INOVA Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fakhre E, Connors KM, Curley AJ, Argintar EH. Outcomes of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Multiligament Knee Reconstruction. Orthopedics 2021; 44:187-191. [PMID: 34039213 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20210415-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has shown promise in reducing postoperative complications in several applications in orthopedic surgery, including trauma and arthroplasty. To the authors' knowledge, no study has evaluated its use in multiligament knee reconstruction. Multiligament knee reconstruction is often fraught with arthrofibrosis and wound-healing complications. This retrospective study assessed complications requiring reoperation in patients who underwent multiligament knee reconstruction and received either NPWT (n=14) or a dry sterile dressing (DSD) (n=44). There were significantly more reoperations in the cohort of patients who received a DSD (P=.011). Arthrofibrosis in particular showed a significantly lower rate of occurrence in the NPWT cohort compared with the DSD cohort (P=.025). There was a trend toward a lower infection rate in the NPWT cohort (P=.322). This study provides evidence that NPWT may be effective in reducing reoperation after multiligament knee reconstruction. Further investigations with prospective studies are needed to draw stronger conclusions about the benefits of NPWT. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):187-191.].
Collapse
|
35
|
Curley AJ, Minhas A, Ehlers CB, Postma WF. Labral Index-Controlling Femoral Size to Evaluate the Relationship Between Relative Labral Size and Acetabular Version. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e791-e797. [PMID: 34195646 PMCID: PMC8220629 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the relationship of acetabular version with the length of the anterior and posterior labrum and to introduce a developed metric, the labral index, as a means of controlling for femoral head size when measuring labral length. Methods One hundred forty-eight patients who underwent hip arthroscopies for femoroacetabular impingement from October 2017 to October 2019 by a single hip surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram was used to measure central acetabular version (at the center of the femoral head) and cranial acetabular version (at the midpoint between the acetabular roof and center of the femoral head), as well as labral length at the anterior, posterior, and superolateral locations (3, 9, and 12 o’clock, respectively). Labral index was calculated by dividing anterior, posterior, and superolateral labral lengths by the radius of the femoral head. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the association between the 2 continuous variables. A priori alpha of 0.05 was established as the cutoff for significance. Results Forty-three patients (26 female, 17 male) with an average age of 34.2 ± 11.6 years were included in analysis. Increased central anteversion was significantly associated with a larger anterior labral length and index (P = .023, r = 0.343 and .005, r = 0.415, respectively). Cranial anteversion weakly correlated with a significantly increased anterior labral index (P = .047, r = 0.304) but not with larger anterior labral length (P = .089, r = 0.262). No statistically significant association was present for central or cranial version with posterior or superolateral labral measurements. Lateral center edge angle did not correlate with labral size at any location. Conclusions In patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement, greater acetabular anteversion was significantly associated but weakly correlated with increased anterior labral length, whereas no association was found between posterior labral length and acetabular version. The labral index may be a useful metric to normalize labral length relative to the radius of the femoral head that warrants further investigation for its clinical utility in guiding labral reconstruction versus labral repair. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Arjun Minhas
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Cooper B Ehlers
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Curley AJ, Chang ES. Operative Positioning Technique for an Intertrochanteric Fracture in a Patient with an Ipsilateral Below-the-Knee Amputation: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 2019; 9:e1. [PMID: 30628919 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.18.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
CASE A 56-year-old man with a remote history of a left below-the-knee amputation (BKA) presented to the emergency department with an ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture (IT). This case produced an operative challenge because commonly used intraoperative traction methods could not be applied to a patient with a BKA. CONCLUSION We describe a rarely utilized surgical technique of applying traction to an amputated extremity through an inverted boot on a fracture table during open reduction and internal fixation of an IT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopaedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Edward S Chang
- Department of Orthopedics, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Curley AJ, Terhune EB, Velott AT, Argintar EH. Outcomes of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2018; 41:e837-e840. [PMID: 30321445 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20181010-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Negative pressure wound therapy is becoming more commonly used to prevent wound complications in joint arthroplasty, although few studies have assessed its outcomes compared with those of a traditional dry sterile dressing. This retrospective study assessed complications that required return to the operating room in a cohort of patients who received a dry sterile dressing (n=159) vs negative pressure wound therapy (n=32). There were significantly more overall complications (P=.0293) in the dry sterile dressing group (23.3%) compared with the negative pressure wound therapy group (6.3%); however, these findings were not statistically significant when each individual complication was compared separately. The infection rate in the dry sterile dressing group and the negative pressure wound therapy group was 5.7% and 0%, respectively (P=.3607). A larger, prospective study is needed to confirm the lower infection rate and before any definitive conclusions can be reached. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e837-e840.].
Collapse
|
38
|
Bodendorfer BM, Curley AJ, Kotler JA, Ryan JM, Jejurikar NS, Kumar A, Postma WF. Outcomes After Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46:2798-2808. [PMID: 29016194 DOI: 10.1177/0363546517732526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No meta-analysis has compared outcomes of operative and nonoperative proximal hamstring avulsion treatment. PURPOSE To compare outcomes of operative and nonoperative proximal hamstring avulsion treatment, including acute, chronic, partial, and complete repairs. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTdiscus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched up to July 2016. Three authors screened the studies and performed quality assessment using criteria from the Methodologic Index for Nonrandomized Studies. A best evidence synthesis was subsequently used. RESULTS Twenty-four studies (795 proximal hamstring avulsions) were included. Twenty-two studies included proximal hamstring avulsion repairs; 1 study had proximal hamstring avulsion repairs and a control group of nonoperatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions; and 1 study had solely nonoperatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions. The majority of studies were of low methodological quality. Overall, repairs had significantly higher patient satisfaction (90.81% vs 52.94%), hamstring strength (85.01% vs 63.95%), Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores (72.77 vs 69.53), and single-legged hop test results (119.1 vs 56.62 cm) (all P < .001); complications occurred in 23.17% of cases. Compared with chronic repairs, acute avulsion repairs had greater patient satisfaction (95.48% vs 83.79%), less pain (1.07 vs 3.71), and greater strength (85.2% vs 82.8%), as well as better scores for the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (75.64 vs 71.5), UCLA activity scale (University of California, Los Angeles; 8.57 vs 8.10), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (93.36 vs 86.50) (all P < .001). Compared with partial avulsion repairs, complete avulsion repairs had higher patient satisfaction (89.64% vs 81.35%, P < .001), less pain (1.87 vs 4.60, P < .001), and higher return to sport or preinjury activity level, but this was insignificant (81.43% vs 73.83%, P = .082). Partial avulsion repairs had better hamstring strength (86.04% vs 83.71%, P < .001) and endurance (107.13% vs 100.17%, P < .001). Complete repairs had significantly higher complication rates (29.38% vs 11.27%, P = .001). CONCLUSION Proximal hamstring avulsion repair resulted in superior outcomes as compared with nonoperative treatment, although the complication rate was 23.17%. The nonoperative group was quite small, making a true comparison difficult. Acute repairs have better outcomes than do chronic repairs. Complete avulsion repairs had higher patient satisfaction, less pain, and a higher complication rate than partial avulsion repairs, although partial avulsion repairs had better hamstring strength and endurance. Studies of high methodological quality are lacking in terms of investigating the outcomes of proximal hamstring avulsion repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake M Bodendorfer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Joshua A Kotler
- Bone & Joint/Sports Medicine Institute, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| | - James M Ryan
- School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Anagha Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William F Postma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Curley AJ, Davis WA, Argintar EH. A Novel Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique Using Internally Braced Semitendinosus Autograft. Orthopedics 2018; 41:e738-e740. [PMID: 30092108 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180806-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Medial collateral ligament reconstruction is often performed in knees with multiligamentous injury, and numerous techniques have been previously described. A novel method of internally bracing and reconstructing the medial collateral ligament with a semitendinosus autograft is described. This provides several advantages, including reproducible isometric graft placement, optimized fixation strength, and internal bracing. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e738-e740.].
Collapse
|