Arthroscopic Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Triple- Versus Single-Bundle Reconstruction

Surgical Management of the Horizontal Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint of a Young Athlete: A Case Report

The acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is commonly injured due to a force to the lateral aspect of the shoulder with the arm in adduction resulting in vertical or multidirectional instability. However, in this case report, we present a rare case of an athlete with isolated horizontal ACJ instability, which was treated surgically using a hamstring allograft. We highlight the surgical technique use to stabilize the joint in the horizontal (anterior to posterior) plane. Isolated horizontal instability of the ACJ is very rare and, to our knowledge, this surgical technique has not been reported in the case of a young athlete.

Current trends in surgical treatment of the acromioclavicular joint injuries in 2023: a review of the literature

Background

This article examines the wide range of surgical reconstruction options available for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. However, the lack of consensus regarding the most suitable surgical techniques is attributed to the high and variable failure rates observed with current approaches.

Methods

This article presents a comprehensive overview of the current surgical principles and techniques used by renowned experts in the field of AC shoulder injury management.

Results

It emphasizes the significance of addressing horizontal and rotational instability in AC injuries and highlights the impact of impaired scapular biomechanics.

Conclusion

By exploring these emerging concepts and strategies, the article aims to lay the foundation for future studies aimed at improving treatment outcomes and patient management.

Efficacy of allogeneic tendon material coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with Kirschner wire and titanium alloy hook plate material fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Objective

To compare the effects of allogeneic tendon coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with Kirschner wire fixation and clavicular hook plate fixation on early postoperative pain, postoperative shoulder joint function score and shoulder joint mobility in patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Methods

From January 2020 to January 2023, 43 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation admitted to Xi 'an Honghui Hospital were included. Among them, 24 patients were treated with the clavicular hook plate technique (Hook Plate,HP) group, and 19 patients were treated with allogeneic tendon coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with the Kirschner wire technique (Allogeneic Tendon, AT) group. The Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint function 6 months after operation, postoperative shoulder joint activity, preoperative and postoperative pain, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

All 43 patients were followed up for an average of 9.7 (9-12) months. The intraoperative blood loss in the allogeneic tendon group was less than in the hook plate group. The Constant-Murley shoulder function score was higher than that in the hook plate group 6 months after the operation. The abduction and lifting activity was greater than that in the hook plate group. The visual analogue scale scores at 3 days and 14 days after operation were lower than those in the hook plate group. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was 1 case (5.3%) of exudation around the Kirschner needle track in the allogeneic tendon reconstruction group, and 5 cases (20.8%) of complications in the hook plate group, including 1 case of internal fixation stimulation, 2 cases of acromion impingement syndrome, 1 case of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, and 1 case of shoulder joint stiffness. The complication rate of the allogeneic tendon group was lower than that of the hook plate group.

Conclusion

The clinical efficacy of allogeneic tendon coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with Kirschner wire fixation in treating acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood type III-V) is better than hook plate internal fixation. The patients have less early postoperative pain and better recovery of shoulder joint function and shoulder joint mobility.

Functional reconstruction of chronic acromioclavicular joint separation using a double suture technique combined with semitendinosus autograft

PURPOSE

We present the functional and clinical results of a combined surgical technique that functionally restores chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (AJI). The method combines a double-looped suture fixation augmented with a semitendinosus autograft.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2021, 15 patients were treated using the surgical technique. All patients suffered an Acromioclavicular Joint Separation that remained untreated for at least 6 (6-16) weeks after the initial injury. Four Ethibond sutures were passed below the coracoid process and through a 4.5 drill hole in the clavicle. The sutures provided adequate horizontal and vertical reduction and stabilization of the clavicle. A semitendinosus autograft was passed below the coracoid process and looped around the clavicle. The remaining graft limbs were used to reconstruct the acromioclavicular capsule. Patients were radiologically evaluated with bilateral anteroposterior (AP), Zanca, and Alexander views. The clinical evaluation was based on the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score and the Constant-Murley Score.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 31.2 months (17-61). The mean last ACJIS and CMS scores were 96 (90-100) and 97.67 (87-100), respectively. Reduction of the clavicle was radiologically confirmed in all cases throughout the follow-up period. AC arthritis was reported in 1 case without associated clinical symptoms. No significant complications were reported, and all patients returned to the pre-injury activity level.

CONCLUSION

The presented functional reconstruction of the AC joint disruption in chronic cases is an effective and secure method with low complication rates and good clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood III/IV: a retrospective study on clavicular hook plate versus arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation of Rockwood III/IV.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with ACJ dislocation in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 was conducted. The patients were assigned to be treated with arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button (TR group) or clavicular hook plate (HP group). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data and imaging findings of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 58 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. Compared with HP group, TR group had shorter incision length and less blood loss during operation. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months (mean 15.4 months). At 6 months and 12months postoperatively, compared with HP group, TR group had lower VAS and higher CMS, and the difference was statistically significant. At 12 months postoperatively, compared with HP group, TR group had lower ACJ gap and coracoclavicular joint(CCJ) distance, and the difference was statistically significant.In HP group, there were 3 cases of subacromial impact, 1 case of redislocation, 2 cases of traumatic arthritis and 2 cases of wound infection. There was 1 case of redislocation in TR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with clavicular hook plate, arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button is minimally invasive, safe and effective in the treatment of ACJ dislocation, and has a good trend in clinical application.

Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Athletic Ability in Shoulder Sports After Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic Type 3 and 5 Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Background

Promising short- and midterm outcomes have been seen after anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) for chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries.

Purpose/Hypothesis

To evaluate long-term outcomes and shoulder-related athletic ability in patients after ACCR for chronic type 3 and 5 ACJ injuries. It was hypothesized that these patients would maintain significant functional improvement and sufficient shoulder-sport ability at a long-term follow-up.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Included were 19 patients (mean age, 45.9 ± 11.2 years) who underwent ACCR for type 3 or 5 ACJ injuries between January 2003 and August 2014. Functional outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Rowe, Constant-Murley, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores as well as the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, which were collected preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Postoperative shoulder-dependent athletic ability was assessed using the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS). Shoulder activity level was evaluated using the Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS), while the Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sports (SPORTS) score was collected to assess the patients' ability to return to their preinjury sporting activity.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 10.1 ± 3.8 years (range, 6.1-18.8 years). Patients achieved significant pre- to postoperative improvements on the ASES (from 54.2 ± 22.6 to 83.5 ± 23.1), Rowe (from 66.6 ± 18.1 to 85.3 ± 19), Constant-Murley (from 64.6 ± 20.9 to 80.2 ± 22.7), SST (from 7.2 ± 3.4 to 10.5 ± 2.7), SANE (from 30.1 ± 23.2 to 83.6 ± 26.3), and VAS pain scores (from 4.7 ± 2.7 to 1.8 ± 2.8) (P < .001 for all), with no significant differences between type 3 and 5 injuries. At the final follow-up, patients achieved an ASOSS of 80.6 ± 32, SAS level of 11.6 ± 5.1, and SPORTS score of 7.3 ± 4.1, with no significant differences between type 3 and 5 injuries. Four patients (21.1%) had postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing ACCR using free tendon allografts for chronic type 3 and 5 ACJ injuries maintained significant improvements in functional outcomes at the long-term follow-up and achieved favorable postoperative shoulder-sport ability, activity, and return to preinjury sports participation.

Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: A Historic Account

There has been a rapid evolution in best practice management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. AP, Zanca, scapular Y, and dynamic axillary radiographic views provide optimal visualization of the joint and may assess for the presence of horizontal AC instability. Severity of AC joint pathology is classified according to the 6-tier Rockwood scoring system. Over 160 surgical techniques have been described for AC joint repair and reconstruction in the last decade; as a result, determining the optimal treatment algorithm has become increasingly challenging secondary to the lack of consistently excellent clinical outcomes.

Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury

Background

Evidence for the superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still lacking.

Hypothesis

It was hypothesized that surgical treatment will outperform nonsurgical treatment.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

A prospective randomized trial involving 4 study centers was performed from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2016. A total of 85 patients with acute Rockwood type 3 ACJ dislocations were allocated randomly to receive either nonsurgical or surgical treatment. A total of 70 patients were treated as allocated, and 8 patients made an early crossover from nonsurgical to surgical treatment, leaving 47 patients treated surgically and 31 patients nonsurgically. All patients were followed up longitudinally, including clinical evaluation using the Constant score and standardized radiographic evaluation, with final follow-up after 2 years.

Results

At no follow-up time point was there a significant difference in Constant score between the surgically and nonsurgically treated patients. Radiographic analysis showed not only an inferior coracoclavicular distance at all follow-up points for surgical treatment but also a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossifications, without any negative clinical correlation. With regard to complications, 1 patient (3%) in the nonsurgical group underwent secondary surgical ACJ stabilization. The revision rate after surgical treatment was 17% (P < .001). Neither primary horizontal instability nor younger age were associated with inferior clinical outcomes after nonsurgical treatment.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of ACJ Rockwood type 3 injuries did not lead to superior functional outcomes. Neither younger age nor horizontal instability were associated with inferior outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment led to a slower recovery and to higher complication and revision rates.

Registration

ISRCTN registry (study ID: ISRCTN92265154).

Anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization with chemically sterilized tendon allografts: A retrospective study

Background

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze whether chemically sterilized tendon allografts perform as well as other non-sterilized allografts and autografts as described in the literature for anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization for the treatment of Rockwood III-V. Allografts are still described as a factor for higher re-rupture rates.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from 21 acromioclavicular joint stabilizations performed by a single surgeon and performed between 2011 and 2014 using sterilized semitendinosus allografts. The primary endpoints were re-rupture and complication rates. Secondary endpoints were AC-joint stability, pain level, return to work and sport and the range of motion.

Results

No re-ruptures occurred during the mean follow-up time of 33 months. Zero complications occurred directly after surgery, but three complications later than three weeks after surgery. All cases resolved without further surgery. After surgery, stability significantly improved for all patients. Post-surgery, 19 patients had stable acromioclavicular joints and only two patients showed minor instabilities. Range of motion returned to the range of the healthy shoulders for all patients.

Conclusion

Chemically sterilized semitendinosus allograft use for anatomic AC-joint stabilization is equivalent to the use of other allografts or autografts and required no hardware removal. No donor age or graft size dependence was observed, due to zero re-ruptures.

[Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instabilities]

Acromioclavicular joint instabilities are one of the most common injuries of the shoulder girdle. Diagnostic measures include the vertical and horizontal components of instability. The main goals of treatment include pain reduction, joint stabilization, and return to physical activity. For operative treatment, there are numerous techniques available. Recently, minimally-invasive techniques were developed and showed equal results as with open approach. These procedures facilitate simultaneous treatment of concomitant shoulder lesions and reduce soft tissue trauma as well as the risk of infection. This article presents an overview of such minimally-invasive techniques for both acute and chronic instabilities. Both techniques address the aspect of horizontal instability, which was found to compromise clinical results. For an acute injury, we describe the use of a low-profile button system combined with an additional acromioclavicular cerclage. In the chronic setting with a bidirectional (vertical and horizontal) instability, a free tendon graft combined with a single TightRope augmentation is recommended.

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries in Sport

ABSTRACT

Sport-related shoulder injuries, including disruptions to the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ), are common. An ACJ injury is classified by the degree and direction of the clavicle displacement. Although the diagnosis can be made clinically, standard radiographic views are important to determine the severity of the ACJ disruption and assess for concurrent injuries. The majority of ACJ injuries can be managed nonoperatively; however, surgical treatment is indicated in some cases. Long-term outcomes are generally favorable for most ACJ injuries, and athletes generally return to sport without functional limitations. This article provides an in-depth discussion regarding all aspects of ACJ injuries, including clinically relevant anatomy, biomechanics, evaluation, treatment, and complications.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Double-Bundle Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tape Provides Superior Vertical Stability Than the Single-Bundle Reconstruction for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between single- and double-bundle arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic-assisted CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes for acute AC joint dislocation from July 2014 to March 2019 were identified. This study included patients treated for acute AC joint dislocation within 2 weeks after an injury, with a Rockwood classification of III or V and at least 2 years of follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction technique: group I (single-bundle technique) and group II (double-bundle technique). The clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and visual analog scale for pain score between the 2 groups. On the plain radiograph, the CC interval ratio (CCIR) was measured to evaluate maintenance of CC interval fixation. Postoperative complications, including reduction failure, were also documented.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (26 in group I, 32 in group II) were enrolled. There were no significant differences in CCIR between the 2 groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. However, the CCIR of group I was significantly greater than that of group II 6 months postoperatively (group I: 160.5% ± 48.5%, group II: 125.4% ± 38.9% at 6 months postoperatively, P = .01; group I: 164.0% ± 57.3%, group II: 123.2% ± 35.9% at the last visit, P = .01). Despite radiologic differences, the clinical outcomes demonstrated no significant differences between 2 the groups (ASES score: 93.5 ± 5.2 in group I, 94.4 ± 4.5 in group II, P = .54; Constant score: 92.9 ± 5.3 in group I, 94.8 ± 4.3 in group II, P = .16). Reduction failure occurred in 4 patients (15.3%) in group I and in 1 patient (3.2%) in group II (P = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic-assisted double-bundle CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes provided superior vertical stability than the single-bundle technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Open Acromioclavicular Repair With a Suture Cerclage Tensioning System: A Case Series

Introduction Numerous surgical techniques to address a type III and type V acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation have been described in the literature, but a preferred standard approach is still in debate. Current approaches include anatomic reduction, coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction, and anatomic reconstruction of the joint. In this case series, subjects received a surgical approach that avoids metal anchors and utilizes a suture cerclage tensioning system to achieve adequate reduction. Surgical technique An AC joint repair was achieved with a suture cerclage tensioning system, which allows the surgeon to apply a specific amount of force on the clavicle to achieve adequate reduction. This technique repairs the AC and CC ligaments, restoring the anatomy of the AC joint while avoiding some of the common risks and disadvantages associated with metal anchors. Methods From June 2019 to August 2022, 16 patients underwent repair of the AC joint with a suture cerclage tension system. Inclusion criteria included the diagnosis of type III or type V AC joint separation with another concomitant injury, acute and chronic injury, and patients who attended all their postoperative visits. Exclusion criteria included patients who lost to follow-up or patients who missed any of their postoperative visits. Radiographic images were taken during each subject's preoperative and postoperative visits, and the CC distance was measured to determine the integrity of the all-suture cerclage repair. Results Of the 16 patients included in this case series, radiographic images taken during each subject's postoperative visit showed a stable construct with little changes in the CC distance. The average change in CC distance when comparing the two-week and one-month postoperative follow-up is 0.2mm. The average change in CC distance when comparing the two-week and two-month postoperative follow-up is 1.45mm. The average change in CC distance when comparing the two-week and four-month postoperative follow-up is 2.6mm. Conclusion Overall, an AC joint repair with the suture cerclage tension system can be a viable, cost-effective technique for restoring vertical and horizontal stability. Although follow-up, larger-scale studies are required to determine the biomechanical integrity of the construct with an all-suture approach, this case series presents 16 subjects whose postoperative radiographic images showed only a small change in CC distance at two to four months after surgery.

Acromioclavicular reconstruction techniques after acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review of biomechanical studies

BACKGROUND

Residual horizontal instability after surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint injuries is seen as a potential cause of suboptimal clinical outcomes. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the acromioclavicular capsule/ligaments are the primary restraints for anteroposterior translation. However, limited studies have addressed the biomechanics of a reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule/ligaments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical role of acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques after an acromioclavicular joint injury.

METHODS

A search was carried out on the databases Medline and EMBASE, and was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Biomechanical studies addressing horizontal and vertical displacement or joint stiffness after reconstructing the acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with or without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction, were included.

FINDINGS

Nineteen studies were included in this review after screening and eligibility assessment. Five of them investigated different sole acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques. In 10 studies, a sole coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was compared to a coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with additional acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction. The remaining 4 studies compared different acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques with each other.

INTERPRETATION

Several testing protocols to evaluate acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction have been described and can make it difficult to compare the results of the different studies. Acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction may provide increased anteroposterior and rotational stability but an optimal reconstruction technique, which mimics all biomechanical characteristics of the native joint is not yet available.

Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability - a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery

BACKGROUND

There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century.

MAIN BODY

Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability.

CONCLUSION

Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Chronic Acromioclavicular Dislocation With Semitendinosus Autograft and Coracoclavicular Suspension Fixation

The management of acromioclavicular dislocations remains controversial. On many occasions, these chronic dislocations are asymptomatic. However, there are patients who, despite good rehabilitation treatment, do present with pain, periscapular muscle fatigue, weakness, paresthesia or scapular dyskinesia. In these patients, surgical treatment is indicated.

Horizontal instability after acromioclavicular joint reduction using the two-hole technique is preferred over the loop technique: a single-blind randomized clinical trial

Background

Most acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are caused by direct trauma to the shoulders, and various methods and techniques are used to treat them; however, none of the options can be considered the gold standard. This study examines the horizontal stability of the ACJ after a complete dislocation was repaired using one of two Ethibond suture techniques, the loop technique and the two holes in the clavicle technique.

Methods

In this single-blind, randomized clinical trial, 104 patients diagnosed with complete ACJ dislocation type V were treated using Ethibond sutures with either the loop technique or the two holes in the clavicle technique. Horizontal changes in the ACJ were radiographically assessed in the lateral axial view, and shoulder function was evaluated by the Constant (CS) and Taft (TS) scores at intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Results

The horizontal stability of the ACJ was better with the two-hole technique than the loop technique at all measurement times. CS and TS changes showed a significant upward trend over time with both techniques. The mean CS and TS at the final visit were 95.2 and 11.6 with the loop technique and 94.0 and 11.9 with the two-hole technique, respectively. The incidence of superficial infections caused by the subcutaneous pins was the same in the two groups.

Conclusions

Due to the improved ACJ stability with the two-hole technique, it appears to be a more suitable option than the loop technique for AC joint reduction.

Treatment of Failed Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstructions: Primary Acromioclavicular Ligament and Capsular Reconstruction and Revision Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are a common injury affecting 2 of every 10,000 people in the general population and comprise 9% to 12% of all injuries to the shoulder. Most injuries occur through contact activity, which drives the acromion inferiorly with the clavicle remaining in its anatomic position, initiating a cascade of injury propagating from the AC ligament followed by failure of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Many techniques have been described for AC joint injuries, without a consensus gold standard. The revision setting offers even less consensus on treatment options and countless difficulties for surgeons. There have been more than 60 described procedures regarding AC and coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions, with significant controversy regarding the optimal intervention for each injury. When these techniques fail, it is important to pinpoint the mechanism of failure to construct a successful plan for revision. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred method of primary AC and revision coracoclavicular reconstruction using a combination of autograft and allograft semitendinosus as well as TightRope fixation.

The Morphology of the Acromioclavicular Joint Does Not Influence the Postoperative Outcome Following Acute Stabilization—A Case Series of 81 Patients

Purpose

To specifically evaluate the influence of the acromioclavicular (AC)-joint morphology on the outcome after arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization surgery with suspensory fixation systems and to investigate whether an additional open AC-joint reduction and AC cerclage improves the clinical outcome for patients with certain morphologic AC-joint subtypes.

Methods

Patients with an acute acromioclavicular joint injury, who underwent arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization with suspensory fixation systems with or without concomitant AC cerclage between January 2009 and June 2017 were identified and included in this retrospective cohort analysis. AC-joint morphology was assessed on preoperative radiographs and categorized as “flat” or “non-flat” (“oblique”/“curved”) subtypes. After a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain were collected. A subgroup analysis of clinical outcomes depending on the surgical technique and morphological subtype of the AC joint was performed.

Results

Eighty-one patients (95% male, mean age 35 ± 12 years) could be included at a mean follow-up of 57 ± 14 months. Radiographic assessment of AC-joint morphology showed 24 (30%) cases of flat type, 38 (47%) cases of curved type, and 19 (23%) cases of oblique morphology. Postoperatively, no clinically significant difference could be detected after the treatment of AC joint injury via CC stabilization with or without concomitant AC cerclage (VAS_rest: P = .067; VAS_max: P = .144, ASES: P = .548; SANE: P = .045). No clinically significant differences were found between the surgical techniques for the flat morphologic subtype (VAS_rest: P = .820; VAS_max: P = .251; SANE: P = .104; ASES: P = .343) or the non-flat subtype (VAS_res: P = .021; VAS_max: P = .488; SANE: P = .243, ASES: P = .843).

Conclusions

In arthroscopically assisted AC stabilization surgery with suspensory fixation systems for acute AC-joint injury, the AC-joint morphology did not influence the postoperative outcome, independent of the surgical technique. No clinical benefit of performing an additional horizontal stabilization could be detected in our collective at mid-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system

PURPOSE

To evaluate immediate loss of reduction in patients undergoing hardware removal after arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization using a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system and to identify risk factors associated with immediate loss of reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 36.4 ± 12.6 years (19-56), who underwent hardware removal 18.2 ± 15.0 months following arthroscopically assisted stabilization surgery using a suspensory fixation system for AC joint injury between 01/2012 and 01/2021 were enrolled in this retrospective monocentric study. The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) as well as the clavicular dislocation/acromial thickness (D/A) ratio were measured on anterior-posterior radiographs prior to hardware removal and immediately postoperatively by two independent raters. Loss of reduction, defined as 10% increase in the CCD, was deemed substantial if the CCD increased 6 mm compared to preoperatively. Constitutional and surgical characteristics were assessed in a subgroup analysis to detect risk factors associated with loss of reduction.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the CCD significantly increased from 12.6 ± 3.7 mm (4.8-19.0) to 14.5 ± 3.3 mm (8.7-20.6 mm) (p < 0.001) while the D/A ratio increased from 0.4 ± 0.3 (- 0.4-0.9) to 0.6 ± 0.3 (1.1-0.1) (p = 0.034) compared to preoperatively. In 10 cases (45%), loss of reduction was identified, while a substantial loss of reduction (> 6 mm) was only observed in one patient (4.5%). A shorter time interval between index stabilization surgery and hardware removal significantly corresponded to immediate loss of reduction (11.0 ± 5.6 vs. 30.0 ± 20.8 months; p = 0.007), as hardware removal within one year following index stabilization was significantly associated with immediate loss of reduction (p = 0.027; relative risk 3.4; odds ratio 11.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial loss of reduction after hardware removal of a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system was rare, indicating that the postoperative result of AC stabilization is not categorically at risk when performing this procedure. Even though radiological assessment of the patients showed a statistically significant immediate superior clavicular displacement after this rarely required procedure, with an increased incidence in the first year following stabilization, this may not negatively influence the results of ACJ stabilization in a clinically relevant way.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The reverse coracoacromial ligament transfer for "horizontal" acromioclavicular joint instability

Background

Acromioclavicular (AC) horizontal instability is a problem affecting not only young athletic patients after a trauma to the AC joint but also older patients who have undergone distal clavicle resection. It may cause pain and poor functional outcomes unless the reconstruction technique specifically addresses the horizontal instability of the clavicle, in addition to the well-known superior instability.

Methods

Three cadaveric specimens underwent dissection of the AC joint capsule to determine the superior attachments of the AC joint capsule. These shoulders subsequently underwent distal clavicle resection and were loaded to a 7-kg weight in the horizontal plane. The horizontal displacement of the clavicle was measured and resection continued to the point of horizontal instability of the clavicle. Thereafter, the reverse coracoacromial ligament reconstruction technique was performed and recreation of horizontal stability assessed. Utilization of the reverse coracoacromial ligament transfer in two clinical cases will also be presented.

Results

The AC joint capsule is continuous with trapezius and deltoid insertions. The average distance between the articular surface and insertion of the capsule on the clavicle is 10 mm and on the acromion is 14.8 mm. Horizontal clavicular translation increased from 2.3 mm when intact to 3.3 mm with capsular transection, 8.7 mm with 5 mm clavicle resection, and finally 15 mm with a 10-mm clavicle resection. Horizontal instability of the clavicle was demonstrated with a 10-mm clavicle resection.

Conclusion

Horizontal instability of the clavicle is evident with distal clavicle resection of greater than 10 mm. A reverse coracoacromial ligament transfer may be a reasonable technique to address horizontal stability of the clavicle during AC joint reconstruction in the context of painful instability.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopically-Assisted Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Tendon Allograft for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopically-assisted, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon allograft (AA-ACCR) for the treatment of Rockwood type III-V injuries at minimum 2-year follow-up and to perform subgroup analyses of clinical and radiographic outcomes for acute versus chronic and type III versus type IV-V injuries.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, patients who underwent primary AA-ACCR for the treatment of type III-V dislocations and had minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) were collected, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Numeric Assessment Evaluation score, Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary, Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, and patient satisfaction. Preoperative and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was obtained. PROs and CCD were reported for the total cohort and for the subgroups. Complication and revision rates were demonstrated.

RESULTS

In total, 102 patients (10 women, 92 men) with a mean age of 45.0 years (range, 18-73 years) were included. There were 13 complications (12.7%) resulting in revision surgery. After exclusion of revised patients, PROs were available for 69 (77.5%). At mean follow-up of 4.7 years (range, 2.0-12.8 years), all PROs improved significantly (P < .001). Median patient satisfaction was 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.0-10.0). Median preoperative to postoperative CCD decreased significantly (P < .001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant improvements in all PROs and CCD from preoperative to postoperative for both acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V dislocations (P < .05) with no significant differences in postoperative PROs and satisfaction between (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

AA-ACCR for high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries resulted in high postoperative PROs and patient satisfaction with significant improvements from before to after surgery in those who did not undergo revision surgery. Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed that acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V injuries benefitted similarly from AA-ACCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; therapeutic case series.

Anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with semitendinosus tendon graft for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation provides good clinical and radiological results

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of anatomical reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with single-strand semitendinosus tendon graft for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

Patients affected by chronic type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Exclusion criteria were: age under 18 years, concomitant rotator cuff tears, previous surgery to the same shoulder, degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint, infections, neurologic diseases, patients with a previous history of ligament reconstruction procedures that had required harvesting of the semitendinosus tendon from the ipsilateral or contralateral knee. All patients underwent the same surgical technique and rehabilitation. Primary outcome was the normalized Constant score. Secondary outcomes were: DASH score, radiographic evaluation of loss of reduction and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with a mean age of 28.9 ± 8.3 years were included. Mean time to surgery was 12.8 ± 10 months. Mean follow-up was 28.1 ± 2.4 months (range: 24-32). Comparison between pre- and postoperative functional scores showed significant clinical improvement (p < 0.001). Time to surgery was independently associated with a poorer Constant score (p < 0.0001). On radiographs, 4 patients (13.3%) showed asymptomatic partial loss of reduction.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments using a semitendinosus tendon graft for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation provided good clinical and radiological results at minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability

PURPOSE

To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist.

RESULTS

Fourty-four studies were included for a total of 1020 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 38 years. Mean follow-up was 32.9 months. Arthroscopic techniques showed better results than open approach (p < 0.0001). Synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better functional outcomes compared to internal fixation and biologic techniques (p < 0.0001). Among biologic techniques, combined coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments reconstruction showed better Constant (p = 0.0270) and ASES (p = 0.0113) scores compared to isolated coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction; anatomic biologic non-augmented graft reconstruction showed better Constant (p < 0.0001), VAS (p < 0.0001) and SSV (p = 0.0177) results compared to augmented techniques. No differences in functional outcomes could be found between anatomic biologic non-augmented graft versus synthetic reconstructions. Overall, methodological quality of the included studies was low.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic reconstructions, both synthetic and biologic, showed the best functional results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allograft is effective for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries at mid-term follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allografts for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACCR for chronic ACJ injuries between 2003 and 2017 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley (CM), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores. Radiographic loss of reduction during follow-up was evaluated by calculating the difference (mm) in the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) of the involved side immediately postoperatively and at terminal follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (mean age: 42.7 ± 12.8 years) were included in the study with an average follow-up of 3.8 ± 3.1 years (range: 1.1-11.5 years). Patients achieved significant improvement in ASES (50.2 ± 20.1 pre to 85.2 ± 16.3 post), CM (60.2 ± 18.5 pre to 88.2 ± 9.1 post), SST (6.1 ± 3.2 pre to 9.5 ± 3.7 post), and SANE (24.0 ± 25.7 pre to 89.0 ± 12.7 post) scores (P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in functional improvement when comparing type III and V injuries (n.s.). Mean increase in CCD of the involved side from immediately postoperative to final radiographic follow-up was 4.1 ± 3.9 mm, with no significant correlation to clinical outcomes scores. Complications occurred in 33.3% of cases, with postoperative heterotopic ossification being most frequent (14.3%).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing ACCR using free tendon allografts for chronic ACJ injuries achieved significant improvement in shoulder function at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. No correlation was observed between the amount of loss of reduction and clinical outcome scores. Free tendon allografts may be a reliable alternative to autografts in the treatment of chronic ACJ dislocations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to compare clinical and radiological outcome of acromio-clavicular joint reconstruction with allografts versus autografts.

METHODS

The PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and WEB OF SCIENCE databases were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines until February 2020 using the terms: 'coracoclavicular' OR 'coraco-clavicular' OR 'acromioclavicular' OR 'acromio-clavicular joint', AND 'reconstruction'. All studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcome as well as complications after ACJ reconstruction using allo- and/or autografts were included.

RESULTS

A total of 29 articles, including 2 prospective and 27 retrospective studies, involving 622 patients, reconstructed with either allo- (n = 360) or auto-grafts (n = 262), for acromio-clavicular joint instability were identified and included in this review. The majority of studies had low sample sizes (66.7% below n = 20), were retrospective (93.3%), with short-term follow-ups (average 26.2 ± 12.6 months; range 6-186). The study with the largest sample size (n = 128) did not report clinical outcome. A comparison between allo- and auto-graft showed no significant differences regarding age, gender, and follow-up times. Clinical outcome was comparable in both groups, loss of reduction (LOR) and complication rates were higher in the allograft group. Overall a reduction of LOR was shown if additional horizontal stabilization was performed. Also a higher LOR and revision rate was documented in allografts without suture or suture-tape augmentation. The use of more clavicular drill-holes correlated with a higher frequency of fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic review of the available peer-reviewed literature addressing allograft and autograft reconstruction of unstable coracoclavicular ligaments shows that the published studies are generally of low quality with low levels of evidence. The published literature shows no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the use of autografts or allografts in ACJ reconstruction surgery. Surgical techniques utilizing additional horizontal stabilization may contribute to lower rates of LOR. In cases where allograft tissue is used for ACJ reconstruction the use of suture/tape augmentation may reduce LOR rates as well as revision rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of the TightRope system versus hook plate in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a retrospective analysis

This study compared the results of the minimally invasive coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with a single TightRope (MITR) procedure and the hook plate (HP) procedure for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treatment. Sixteen patients with a mean age of 44.9 ± 11 years were treated with the MITR procedure. Nineteen patients with a mean age of 40.2 ± 8.7 years were treated using the HP procedure. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Constant–Murley Score (CMS), and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder score. Vertical displacement of the clavicle with reference to the height of the acromion was measured in standard anteroposterior radiographs. The mean follow-up was 27 months in the MITR group and 30 months in the HP group. No statistically significant differences were found between the MITR group and the HR group in terms of VAS score (0.4 ± 0.6 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.138), UCLA Shoulder score (33.9 ± 2.5 vs 33.7 ± 1.5, P = 0.843), or CMS (95.7 ± 7.3 vs 93.7 ± 6.6, P = 0.400). No redislocation was identified in the HP group, while redislocation occurred in 1 of 16 (6.3%) patients in the MITR group. One patient in the HP group (5.3%) had acromial osteolysis, while no acromial osteolysis was found in the MITR group. No other adverse events, such as infections, tunnel widening, fractures, or implant-related complications, were observed. Both procedures provided satisfactory results. The HP procedure provided better reduction, while the MITR procedure provided a slightly lower tendency of pain. Long-term follow-up is needed to investigate the clinical outcomes and radiological outcomes of both groups.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Activity at Mean 6-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To report clinical and functional outcomes including return to preinjury activity level following arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction (AA-CCR) and to determine associations between return to preinjury activity level, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes following AA-CCR.

METHODS

A institutional registry review of all AA-CCR using free tendon grafts from 2007 to 2016 was performed. Clinical assessment included Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score and return to preinjury activity level at final follow-up. Treatment failure was defined as (1) revision acromioclavicular stabilization surgery, (2) unable to return to preinjury activity level, or (3) radiographic loss of reduction (RLOR, >25% CC distance compared with contralateral side). SANE scores, return to activity, and RLOR were compared between patients within each category of treatment failure, by grade of injury, and whether concomitant pathology was treated.

RESULTS

There were 88 patients (89.8% male) with mean age of 39.6 years and minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean 6.1 years). Most injuries were Rockwood grade V (63.6%). Mean postoperative SANE score was 86.3 ± 17.5. Treatment failure occurred in 17.1%: 8.0% were unable to return to activity, 5.7% had RLOR, and 3.4% underwent revision surgery due to traumatic reinjury. SANE score was lower among patients who were unable to return to activity compared with those with RLOR and compared with nonfailures (P = .0002). There were no differences in revision surgery rates, return to activity, or SANE scores according to Rockwood grade or if concomitant pathology was treated.

CONCLUSIONS

AA-CCR with free tendon grafts resulted in good clinical outcomes and a high rate of return to preinjury activity level. RLOR did not correlate with return to preinjury activity level. Concomitant pathology that required treatment did not adversely affect outcomes. Return to preinjury activity level may be a more clinically relevant outcome measure than radiographic maintenance of acromioclavicular joint reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (Case Series).

Quantitative and Qualitative Surgical Anatomy of the Acromioclavicular Joint Capsule and Ligament: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The acromioclavicular (AC) capsule and ligament have been found to play a major role in maintaining horizontal stability. To reconstruct the AC capsule and ligament, precise knowledge of their anatomy is essential.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the angle of the posterosuperior ligament in regard to the axis of the clavicle, (2) to determine the width of the attachment (footprint) of the AC capsule and ligament on the acromion and clavicle, (3) to determine the distance to the AC capsule from the cartilage border of the acromion and clavicle, and (4) to develop a clockface model of the insertion of the posterosuperior ligament on the acromion and clavicle. It was hypothesized that consistent angles, attachment areas, distances, and insertion sites would be identified.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 12 fresh-frozen shoulders were used (mean age, 55 years [range, 41-64 years]). All soft tissue was removed, leaving only the AC capsule and ligament intact. After a qualitative inspection, a quantitative assessment was performed. The AC joint was fixed in an anatomic position, and the attachment angle of the posterosuperior ligament was measured using a digital protractor. The capsule and ligament were removed, and a coordinate measuring device was utilized to assess the width of the AC capsule footprint and the distance from the footprint to the cartilage border of the acromion and clavicle. The AC joint was then disarticulated, and the previously marked posterosuperior ligament insertion was transferred into a clockface model. The mean values across the 12 specimens were demonstrated with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The mean attachment angle of the posterosuperior ligament was 51.4° (95% CI, 45.2°-57.6°) in relation to the long axis of the entire clavicle and 41.5° (95% CI, 33.8°-49.1°) in relation to the long axis of the distal third of the clavicle. The mean clavicular footprint width of the AC capsule was 6.4 mm (95% CI, 5.8-6.9 mm) at the superior clavicle and 4.4 mm (95% CI, 3.9-4.8 mm) at the inferior clavicle. The mean acromial footprint width of the AC capsule was 4.6 mm (95% CI, 4.2-4.9 mm) at the superior side and 4.0 mm (95% CI, 3.6-4.4 mm) at the inferior side. The mean distance from the lateral clavicular attachment of the AC capsule to the clavicular cartilage border was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 4.0-4.6 mm), and the mean distance from the medial acromial attachment of the AC capsule to the acromial cartilage border was 3.1 mm (95% CI, 2.9-3.4 mm). On the clockface model of the right shoulder, the clavicular attachment of the posterosuperior ligament ranged from the 9:05 (range, 8:00-9:30) to 11:20 (range, 10:00-12:30) position, and the acromial attachment ranged from the 12:20 (range, 11:00-1:30) to 2:10 (range, 13:30-14:40) position.

CONCLUSION

The finding that the posterosuperior ligament did not course perpendicular to the AC joint but rather was oriented obliquely to the long axis of the clavicle, in combination with the newly developed clockface model, may help surgeons to optimally reconstruct this ligament.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our results of a narrow inferior footprint and a short distance from the inferior AC capsule to cartilage suggest that proposed reconstruction of the AC joint capsule should focus primarily on its superior portion.

Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Intraoperatively Decreasing the Coracoclavicular Distance to 50% of the Unaffected Side in Stabilization of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Retrospective Evaluation

Background:

The postoperative failure rate of acromioclavicular (AC) joint fixation using the coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization technique is high. Studies have reported that compared with normal intraoperative anatomic reduction, intraoperative overreduction of the AC joint is more successful in achieving a satisfactory anatomic radiographic outcome at 1- to 2-year follow-up.

Purpose:

To evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes and complications in patients with acute AC joint injury who underwent combined CC stabilization and AC capsular repair in which the CC distance was intraoperatively decreased to 50% of the unaffected side.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, we collected and analyzed the data of patients with an acute AC joint injury (Rockwood type 5) who underwent combined CC stabilization and AC capsular repair during which the CC distance was decreased 50% compared with the unaffected side. At 2-year follow-up, we evaluated functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score), radiographic outcomes (alignment of the AC joint in the vertical and horizontal planes, tunnel widening), and complications (infection, clavicular fracture).

Results:

The study included 20 patients with a mean ± SD age of 42.20 ± 10.10 years. The mean follow-up period was 33.75 ± 11.50 months. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean ASES score was 95.13 ± 5.61. The overreduction alignment, anatomic alignment, and loss reduction alignment rates were 0% (0/20 patients), 95% (19/20 patients), and 5% (1/ 20 patients), respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in the mean CC distance between the affected and unaffected sides on radiographic evaluation. The mean medial clavicular tunnel width and lateral clavicular tunnel width were 5.03 ± 0.68 mm and 4.47 ± 0.67 mm, respectively. None of the patients experienced fractures or infections.

Conclusion:

Excellent functional and radiographic outcomes and no complications were seen at 2-year follow-up in patients with acute AC joint injury who underwent combined CC stabilization and AC capsular repair with the CC distance intraoperatively decreased to 50% of the unaffected side.

Early and delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction provide equivalent outcomes

BACKGROUND

Some comparative studies have reported improved outcomes for early compared with delayed reconstruction for high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. However, most are based on older techniques and did not specifically involve reconstruction of both the coracoclavicular (CC) and AC joint ligaments. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes of early vs. delayed surgical intervention of AC joint dislocations managed with combined CC and AC ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was performed of 53 patients who underwent early (<2 weeks after injury) or delayed (≥2 weeks after injury) open stabilization for AC joint dislocation. All patients were managed with the same surgical technique of combined CC reconstruction and stabilization of the AC joint, except for the addition of a gracilis allograft for biologic CC reconstruction in delayed intervention. Outcome was determined at a minimum follow-up of 12 months, using the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) score, Taft score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and overall satisfaction (0-10). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to test associations of ACJI and Taft scores with 5 independent variables (early vs. delayed surgery, age, sex, manual worker, and Rockwood type).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 47 men (89%) and 6 women (11%) aged 40.1 ± 11.2 years (range, 22-63 years). The early group (n = 31) underwent surgery 1.1 ± 0.5 weeks after injury, whereas the delayed group (n = 22) underwent surgery 84.3 ± 99.1 weeks after injury. There were no significant differences in ACJI scores (87 ± 14 vs. 89 ± 14, P = .267), Taft scores (10.1 ± 1.3 vs. 10.7 ± 1.3, P = .084), pain on VAS (0.3 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 1.1, P = .541), SSV (95 ± 7 vs. 93 ± 9, P = .427), or overall satisfaction (9.6 ± 0.9 vs. 9.4 ± 1.1, P = .491). Multivariable analyses revealed no associations between any of the independent variables and ACJI or Taft score.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and delayed surgical interventions of high-grade AC joint dislocation provide equivalent clinical scores when combined CC and AC joint fixation is used for stabilization. Rapid surgical intervention for high-grade AC joint dislocation may not be necessary, as most patients can still benefit from surgery at a later stage.

Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction

Purpose

To determine whether combined acromioclavicular (AC) ligament reconstruction and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction without bone tunnels would improve radiographic reduction maintenance and complication rates for type III to V AC dislocations.

Methods

This single-institution retrospective study analyzed all patients who underwent a hybrid synthetic/graft wrap CC reconstruction without tunnels with additional AC reconstruction/repair from January 2013 to August 2019. This 26-patient cohort was compared with a 1:1 sex- and age-matched control group who underwent CC reconstruction without AC reconstruction. CC distances on postoperative radiographs were compared with normal contralateral shoulders.

Results

Of the 93 patients who underwent AC reconstructive surgery during this time period, 26 patients (96% male) met the inclusion criteria. The AC/CC cohort had 23.5% type III injuries, 23.1% type IV injuries, and 53.8% type V injuries, similar to the control group. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s CC distance were (mean ± standard deviation) 0.9 ± 4.0 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (9.6 ± 8.7 mm) in the AC/CC cohort. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s coracoclavicular distance were 4.0 ± 4.7 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (13.3 ± 9.3 mm) in the CC control group, a significant difference (P = .014). The AC/CC reconstruction group had fewer patients with a loss of reduction >5 mm (11.5% versus 38.5%, P = .025). The complication rate in the CC control group was higher than in the AC/CC cohort (30.7% versus 7.7%, P = .035). The reoperation rate was also greater in the CC control group (8 versus 1, P = .010).

Conclusion

This cohort study shows that the addition of AC reconstruction to CC reconstruction using synthetic tapes/grafts or allograft tissues without bone tunnels significantly improves durable radiographic outcomes, diminishes complication rates, and improves reoperation rates.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective comparative study.

Restoring Horizontal Stability of the Acromioclavicular Joint: Open Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction and Repair With Semitendinosus Allograft

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common and comprise ∼12% of shoulder injuries. Stability to the AC joint depends on the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments for vertical stability and AC ligaments and capsular structures for horizontal stability. Injuries to the AC ligaments can lead to horizontal instability of the AC joint. There is no gold standard technique for treating these injuries surgically, and many of the described procedures focus on vertical instability rather than horizontal instability. This article describes an open AC ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus allograft to restore horizontal stability of the AC joint.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability

Background:

Revision surgery in cases of previously failed primary acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization remains challenging mainly because of anatomic alterations or technical difficulties. However, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) has been shown to achieve encouraging biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic short-term to midterm results.

Purpose:

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries with a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed on prospectively collected data within an institutional shoulder registry. Patients who underwent revision ACCR for type III through V AC joint injuries between January 2003 and December 2009 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was measured for radiographic analysis immediately postoperatively and at last postoperative follow-up.

Results:

A total of 8 patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 44.6 ± 10.6 years and a mean follow-up of 135.0 ± 17.4 months (range, 120-167 months) were eligible for inclusion in the study. The time from initial AC joint stabilization until revision surgery was 10.2 ± 12.4 months (range, 0.5-36 months); 62.5% of the patients had undergone more than 2 previous AC joint surgical procedures. The ASES score improved from 43.9 ± 22.4 preoperatively to 80.6 ± 28.8 postoperatively (P = .012), the SST score improved from 4.4 ± 3.6 preoperatively to 11.0 ± 2.2 postoperatively (P = .017), and the SANE score improved from 31.4 ± 27.3 preoperatively to 86.9 ± 24.1 postoperatively (P = .018) at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in the CCD (P = .08) between the first (7.6 ± 3.0 mm) and final (10.6 ± 2.8 mm) radiographic follow-up (mean, 50.5 ± 32.7 months [range, 18-98 months]).

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries maintained significant improvement in clinical outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Chronic acromioclavicular dislocations: multidirectional stabilization without grafting

Objective

Clinical and radiological evaluation of the surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations with triple button device and AC joint augmentation.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 21 patients with chronic AC dislocations. All patients underwent bilateral-weighted Zanca and Alexander views as well as the Constant score (CS) and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Scoring System (ACJI).

Results

A total of 21 patients (19 men and 2 women) with the mean age of 30.7 ± 11.7 years (range, 19-62 years) were able to participate in clinical and radiographic follow-up. After a mean follow-up of 49.7 ± 17.1 months (range, 13-60 months), the results of the CS were 95.2 ± 5.5 (range, 85-100) and ACJI test 89.7 ± 7.9 (range, 75-100), showing no significant differences with the uninjured shoulder (CS, 96.2 ± 3.9; range, 85-100; ACJI, 95.7 ± 4.1; range, 85-100). At the final review, we observed that the preoperative coracoclavicular distance (Zanca view) improved from 12.8 ± 1.5 mm to 8.5 ± 1.3 mm and the AC distance (Alexander view) from 7.8 ± 2.3 mm to 0.99 ± 0.91 mm. Compared with healthy shoulder, these differences were not significant. Osteoarthritis or radiological calcifications were not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

The triple button device is an acceptable alternative surgical method for chronic AC joint dislocations. The surgical technique is simple; it does not need a graft, nor does it present major complications, and material extraction is unnecessary.

Sagittal orientation of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction affects the stability of surgical repair

BACKGROUND

The variation in the anatomic relationship between the coracoid and the clavicle affects the biomechanical stability of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR).

METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of 85 patients was analyzed. Anatomic landmarks were used to derive the coracoclavicular sagittal reconstruction angle (sRA). The lateral concave angle, which indicated the shape of the distal clavicle, and the offsets between the clavicle and coracoid were also measured. To investigate the biomechanical effects of the sRA on CCLR, 7 computed tomography scans with different sRAs were 3D printed. Two reconstructions, a single trans-coracoclavicular tunnel and a looped reconstruction technique, were performed sequentially. Models were cyclically loaded at 70 N in the anterior, posterior, and superior directions.

RESULTS

The mean sRA was 68° ± 9.3° (range, 47°-85°). The superoinferior offset between the clavicle and the coracoid and the lateral concave angle positively correlated with the sRA (r = 0.359 and 0.837, respectively; P ≤ .001), whereas the anteroposterior offset had a negative correlation (r = -0.925; P < .001). The sRA had a negative correlation with the anterior displacement of the clavicle (rho = -0.96; P < .001) and a positive correlation with the posterior displacement for both surgical techniques (rho = 1.0; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The anatomic orientation of the native coracoclavicular ligaments is highly variable in the sagittal plane. Low sagittal angles can reduce anterior stability, whereas high sagittal angles can reduce posterior stability of CCLR.

Posterior Rotational and Translational Stability in Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis in Cadaveric Specimens

BACKGROUND

Persistent posterior instability of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a reported complication after isolated coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction. Thus, multiple techniques have been proposed attempting to restore biomechanics of the AC ligament complex (ACLC).

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to evaluate the posterior translational and rotational stability of an ACLC reconstruction with a dermal allograft (ACLC patch) as compared with 3 suture brace constructs. It was hypothesized that the ACLC patch would better restore AC joint posterior stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 28 cadaveric shoulders (mean ± SD age, 57.6 ± 8.3 years) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 surgical techniques: ACLC patch, oblique brace, anterior brace, and x-frame brace. The force and torque to achieve 10 mm of posterior translation and 20° of posterior rotation of the AC joint were recorded in the following conditions: intact, transected ACLC, ACLC patch/brace repair, ACLC patch/brace repair with dissected CC ligaments, and ACLC patch/brace repair with CC ligament repair.

RESULTS

For posterior translation, transection of the ACLC reduced resistance to 16.7% of the native. With the native CC ligaments intact, the ACLC patch (59.1%), oblique brace (54.1%), and anterior brace (60.7%) provided significantly greater stability than the x-frame brace (33.2%; P < .001, P = .008, P < .001, respectively). ACLC patch, oblique brace, and anterior brace continued to have significantly higher posterior translational resistance than the x-frame (35.1%; P < .001, P = .003, P < .001) after transection and subsequent CC ligament repair. For posterior rotation, transection of the ACLC decreased the resistance to 5.4% of the intact state. With the CC ligaments intact, the ACLC patch (77.1%) better restored posterior rotational stability than the oblique (35.3%), anterior (48.5%), and x-frame (23.0%) brace repairs (P < .001, P = .002, P < .001). CC ligament transection and subsequent repair demonstrated the ACLC patch (41.0%) to have improved stability when compared with the oblique (16.0%), anterior (14.0%), and x-frame (12.7%) repairs (P = .006, P = .003, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

ACLC reconstruction with a dermal allograft better restored native posterior rotational stability than other brace constructs, with translational stability similar to the oblique and anterior brace technique at the time of surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Horizontal stability of the AC joint is primarily controlled by the ACLC. Inability to restore AC joint biomechanics can result in persistent posterior instability and lead to functional impairment.

Biomechanical evaluation of an independent acromioclavicular ligament repair for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction

BACKGROUND

A number of surgical techniques for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations have been described; however, few have been able to create a strong intra-operative construct that provides minimal joint translation. A biomechanical study was conducted to examine joint translation in an independent acromioclavicular ligament repair.

METHODS

Three variations of a novel independent acromioclavicular ligament repair technique underwent testing using a Sawbones model. The technique involves threading sutures through two acromial bone tunnels in a suture-bridge configuration and anchoring them into the distal clavicle. Three groups of eight specimens underwent reconstruction; group 1 using FiberTape, group 2 using FiberWire and group 3 using FiberTape in a modified (under-over) suture-bridge configuration. Superior, anterior and posterior translation was tested at loads of 10, 20 and 30 N.

RESULTS

Group 3 repair yielded the least translation in both anterior-posterior and superior-inferior planes, with a two-fold decrease in superior translation compared to groups 1 and 2 (P < .05). Both groups 1 and 3 using FiberTape resulted in significantly less anterior and posterior translation compared to the FiberWire group (P < .05).

DISCUSSION

The independent acromioclavicular ligament repair, without repair of the coracoclavicular ligament, demonstrated significant translational stability in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior planes.

Optimal Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Current Perspectives

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common and mostly involve younger, male individuals. Whereas the majority of AC joint dislocations can be treated nonoperatively with a trial of immobilization, pain medication, cryotherapy, and physiotherapy, there are patients that do not respond well to conservative management and may require surgical treatment. Identifying and treating these patients according to the type and chronicity of AC joint dislocation is paramount. To date, a myriad of surgical techniques have been proposed to address unstable AC joint dislocations and are indicative of the uncertainty that exists in optimal management of these injuries. Historically research has focused on the restoration of the coracoclavicular ligament complex. However, recently the importance of the acromioclavicular capsule and ligaments has been emphasized. This review aims to provide the reader with an overview of current treatment strategies and research, as well as future perspectives.

Horizontal Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common and should be suspected in patients who have shoulder pain in the region of the acromion and clavicle. Injuries to the AC ligament can cause horizontal instability and are often neglected or underdiagnosed, which can lead to poor patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of horizontal instability of the AC joint.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies that investigated diagnosis, treatment, and failure of operative management of acute and chronic AC separations. Studies that did not specifically evaluate AC joint injuries, were not written in English, or were specific only to vertical instability of the AC joint were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 articles met the inclusion criteria and were therefore included in this systematic review. Diagnosing horizontal AC instability is difficult using plain radiographs; dynamic views were shown in some cases to better detect horizontal instability than with static views. More than 60 procedures for treating AC joint injuries have been published, but many focus on vertical rather than horizontal instability. Modifications to current surgical procedures to incorporate reconstruction of the horizontal component showed improved patient outcomes. Such modifications included additional AC joint suture cord cerclage, combined AC and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction, and the Twin Tail TightRope triple button technique. Failure after surgical stabilization of AC joint separation has been reported to occur in 15% to 80% of cases.

CONCLUSION

No consensus is available regarding the best practices for diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of acute or chronic horizontal instability of the AC joint. Moreover, horizontal instability injuries are often neglected or poorly understood, making diagnosis difficult, which may lead to high complication rates and failure after surgical stabilization.

Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Using Dermal Allograft: A Biomechanical Analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze the posterior translational and rotational stability of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint following reconstruction of the superior acromioclavicular ligament complex (ACLC) using dermal allograft.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used (mean age of 65.3 ± 6.9 years). The resistance force against posterior translation (10 mm) and torque against posterior rotation (20°) was measured. Specimens were first tested with both the intact ACLC and coracoclavicular ligaments. The ACLC and coracoclavicular ligaments were then transected so simulate a Type III/V AC joint dislocation. Each specimen then underwent 3 testing conditions, performed in the following order: (1) ACLC patch reconstruction alone, (2) ACLC patch with an anatomic coracoclavicular reconstruction (ACCR) using semitendinosus allograft, and (3) the transected ACLC with an ACCR only. Differences in posterior translational and rotational torque across testing conditions were analyzed with a one-way repeated analysis of variance analysis.

RESULTS

Mean resistance against posterior translation in the intact condition was 65.76 ± 23.8 N. No significant difference found between the intact condition compared with specimens with the ACLC-patch only (44.2 ± 11.3 N, P = .06). The ACCR technique, when tested alone, had significantly less posterior translational resistance compared with the intact condition (38.5 ± 8.94 N, P = .008). ACLC patch in combination with an ACCR was closest in restoring native posterior translation (57.1 ± 19.2 N, P = .75). For rotational resistance, only the addition of the ACLC patch with an ACCR (0.51 ± 0.07 N-m) demonstrated similar torque compared with the intact joint (0.89 ± 0.5 N-m, P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACLC-patch plus ACCR technique was able to closest restore the percent of normal posterior translational and rotational stability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Recurrent posterior instability of the AC joint is a potential complication after coracoclavicular reconstruction surgery. In the in vitro setting, this study demonstrated increased AC joint stability with the addition of an ACLC reconstruction using dermal allograft.

Repair of the entire superior acromioclavicular ligament complex best restores posterior translation and rotational stability

PURPOSE

The acromioclavicular ligament complex (ACLC) is the primary stabilizer against horizontal translation with the superior ACLC providing the main contribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the specific regional contributions in the superior half of ACLC, where the surgeon can easily access and repair or reconstruct, for posterior translational and rotational stability.

METHODS

The superior half of ACLC was divided into three regions; Region A (0°-60°): an anterior 1/3 region of the superior half of ACLC, Region B (60°-120°): a superior 1/3 region of the superior half of ACLC, and Region C (120°-180°): a posterior 1/3 region of the superior half of ACLC. Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. Biomechanical testing was performed to evaluate the resistance force against passive posterior translation (10 mm) and the resistance torque against passive posterior rotation (20°) during the following the four conditions. (1) Stability was tested on all specimens in their intact condition (n = 15). (2) The ACLC was dissected and stability was tested (n = 15). (3) Specimens were randomly divided into three groups by regions of suturing. Stability was tested after suturing Region A, Region B, or Region C (n = 5 per group). (4) Stability was tested after suturing additional regions: Region A + B (0°-120°), Region B + C (60°-180°), or Region A + C (0°-60°, 120°-180°, n = 5 per group).

RESULTS

The translational force increased after suturing Region A when compared with dissected ACLC (P = 0.025). The force after suturing Region A + B was significantly higher compared to the dissected ACLC (P < 0.001). The rotational torque increased after suturing Region A or Region B compared with dissected ACLC (P = 0.020, P = 0.045, respectively). The torque after suturing the Region A + C was significantly higher compared to the dissected ACLC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combined Region A + B contributed more to posterior translational stability than Region B + C or Region A + C. In contrast, combined Region A + C contributed more to posterior rotational stability than Region A + B or Region B + C. Based on these findings, surgical techniques restoring the entire superior ACLC are recommended to address both posterior translational and rotational stability of the AC joint.

Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematize the surgical outcomes of anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction in patients with chronic acromio-clavicular joint (ACJ) instability and determine which technique is superior.

METHODS

This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to April 30th, 2018 for original articles that assessed the outcomes of one or more surgical techniques of anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction in patients with chronic ACJ instability. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess study quality. Pre-to-post meta-analysis was performed for both anatomic and non-anatomic reconstructions.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included comprising 799 patients (mean age of 36.6 years old and 84% males) with a mean follow-up of 34.6 months (range 13 to 74). Surgical techniques included anatomic (tendinous or synthetic grafts/constructs) and non-anatomic reconstruction (Weaver-Dunn or Modified Weaver-Dunn, conjoined tendon transfer, or temporary hook plate). There were significant pre-to-post improvements on the constant score with an average improvement ranging from 11.1 to 50.7 (p < 0.01). Average failure rate was 7.6% (7.5% for anatomic and 8.5% for non-anatomic reconstruction). Non-comparative studies had a mean MINORS score of 9 points (out of 16) and comparative studies 17 (out of 24) with excellent interrater agreement (k = 0.910).

CONCLUSION

Both anatomic and non-anatomic ACJ reconstructions provide significant post-operative improvements, but definitive conclusions on optimal technique remain elusive. Notwithstanding, comparative studies support the use of anatomic ACJ reconstruction which should be preferably used. However, until superiority is demonstrated by robust studies, surgeons should supplement their decision-making with experience and patient preference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Treatment of failed primary reconstruction of the unstable acromioclavicular (AC) joint remains challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. When approaching revision cases, the reason for failure has to be precisely identified. The purpose of this manuscript was to perform a critical review of the literature regarding treatment options for failed AC joint stabilization techniques and to provide a treatment algorithm for salvage procedures.

METHODS

A thorough search included electronic databases for articles published up to April 15th, 2019. Inclusion criteria were set as (1) studies that reported on clinical outcomes following surgical or conservative treatment of AC joint dislocation; (2) studies reporting on failure or complications of primary treatment; (3) chronic instabilities caused by delayed or secondary treatment as well as (4) revision and salvage procedures.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified a total of 3269 citations. The final dataset comprised 84 studies published between 1954 and 2019. A total of 5605 patients (9.63% females) were involved with a mean age of 34.5 years. Overall, complication rates varied between 5 and 88.9% in patients with AC joint instability.

CONCLUSION

In the current literature, evidence for treatment of revision AC joint instability is still lacking, however, surgical treatment continues to evolve. The importance of failure analysis and clinically relevant algorithms were highlighted in this review. Adequately restoring native joint biomechanics is needed for ensuring an optimal healing environment that will translate into patient satisfaction and long-term stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability

PURPOSE

Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction is a well-established and frequently performed procedure. Recent scientific and commercial interest has led to a drive to develop and perform surgical techniques that more reliably restore horizontal stability in order to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical evidence for procedures directed at restoring horizontal stability and determine whether they are associated with superior clinical results when compared to well-established procedures.

METHODS

A review of the online databases Medline and EMBASE was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines on the 23rd December 2017. Biomechanical and clinical studies reporting either static or dynamic horizontal displacement following acromioclavicular joint reconstruction (Coracoclavicular reconstruction or Weaver-Dunn) were included. In addition, biomechanical and clinical studies reporting outcomes after additional augmentation of the acromioclavicular joint were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological index for non-randomised studies tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 18 studies eligible for inclusion: six biomechanical and 12 clinical studies. Comparative biomechanical studies demonstrated that acromioclavicular augmentation provided significantly increased horizontal stability compared to the coracoclavicular reconstruction and Weaver-Dunn procedure. Comparative clinical studies demonstrated no significant differences between coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without acromioclavicular augmentation in terms of functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon and Constant score), complication or revision rates. However, one comparative study did demonstrate an improvement in Taft (p = 0.018) and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability scores (p = 0.0001) after acromioclavicular augmentation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, coracoclavicular reconstruction with augmentation of the acromioclavicular joint has been shown to provide improved horizontal stability in both biomechanical and clinical studies compared to isolated coracoclavicular reconstruction. However, comparative studies have shown no clinical advantage with respect to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon or Constant scores and, therefore, the results of this systematic review do not support acromioclavicular augmentation in routine clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.