Validation of an MRI Protocol for Routine Quantitative Assessment of Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis does not enhance ACL graft healing, however, does reduce graft tunnel widening

PURPOSE

The study hypothesized that the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) had a significant effect on ACL graft healing.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients were divided into two cohorts matched for gender, age, body mass index, time from surgery to post-operative MRI and graft diameter. Forty patients underwent ACL reconstruction alone, while 40 underwent ACLR in addition to LEAT. Patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan at 12 months post-surgery; tunnel apertures were measured using multiplanar reformation, graft healing was assessed using signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) in three regions of interest and finally graft maturity and integration were classified using the Howell and Ge scale, respectively. In addition, clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcome measures were collected.

RESULTS

The mean femoral tunnel widening at 12 months post-surgery was 39.8 ± 14.0% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 55.2 ± 12.7% in the ACLR alone group (p < 0.05). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 29.3 ± 12.7% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 44.4 ± 12.1% in the ACLR group (p < 0.05). The mean adjusted graft SNQ was 9.0 ± 14.9 in the ACLR + LEAT group and 9.5 ± 11.4 in the ACLR group (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

At 1 year post-operatively, we noted significantly less femoral and tibial tunnel widening in the ACLR + LEAT group. LEAT did not result in a statistically significant effect on graft healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Association of Anterior Knee Pain With Extension Deficit After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background

Previous systematic reviews have reported the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) and extension deficit (ED) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, both outcomes are estimated separately and thus are assumed to be uncorrelated.

Purpose

To estimate whether there is a clinically relevant association between the population effects of ED and AKP after ACLR.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Under PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases for published articles reporting incidence of both AKP and ED after ACLR with either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring (HS) graft that returned 298 studies after the initial search. A Bayesian hierarchical measurement error model estimated the population effect of ED and AKP.

Results

Twelve publications involving 976 patients (mean follow-up, 77.9 months; range, 24-180 months) were included in the systematic review. There was a clear, moderate correlation between population ED and population AKP for the BPTB (r = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.39-0.42) and the HS grafts (r = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.33-0.36). Model expected estimates for the population effects of AKP and ED were 24.1% (95% CI, 17.4%-31.9%) and 17.5% (95% CI, 10.6%-25.0%), respectively, for the BPTB graft and 16.1% (95% CI, 9.2%-23.9%) and 13.1% ED (95% CI, 6.0%-20.8%) for the HS graft, respectively. The posterior mean difference in AKP between BPTB and HS grafts was clear and substantial (8.3% [95% CI, 0.3% to 16.1%]); there was no substantial difference in the posterior mean difference of ED between BPTB and HS grafts (4.3% [95% CI, -3.8% to 13.0%).

Conclusion

Our systematic review demonstrated a moderate but clear correlation between ED and AKP irrespective of graft type. From a clinical perspective, this association emphasizes the need for intraoperative achievement of full extension and avoidance of situations that may cause ED. The higher incidence of AKP in patients with BPTB graft may also be attributed to factors related to the graft harvest site. Future metaregression analyses could investigate whether additional factors such as follow-up duration or rehabilitation protocols can moderate the association between AKP and ED after ACLR with either BPTB or HS graft.

The use of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) sequencing improves the diagnostic evaluation of graft integrity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with metal artifact reduction sequencing is superior to conventional knee MRI in the evaluation of an injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft, where visualisation on conventional MRI can be limited by the metal artifact from fixation devices.

METHODS

Eighteen patients underwent conventional MRI sequence (proton density fat saturated [PDFS]) and two types of metal artifact reduction sequencing MRI (WARP, slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC); Siemens) following a secondary injury to their ACL reconstructed knee. Six raters with experience in knee MRI evaluation reviewed sagittal PDFS, WARP, and SEMAC sequences, providing semi-quantitative grades for visualisation and diagnostic confidence assessing the ACL, posterior cruciate ligament , menisci, tibial and femoral tunnel margins, and articular cartilage. Intra-class correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability were evaluated. The 6-rater mean scores for the visualisation and diagnostic confidence derived from each sequence were compared using the Friedman test for multiple paired samples.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in the ACL visualisation among the sequences was found (p ​= ​0.193). Further, a subgroup analysis was performed in cases evaluated as "moderately blurry" or "indistinct ACL visualisation" on PDFS (58% of cases). SEMAC significantly improved diagnostic confidence in ACL visualisation (p ​= ​0.041) and ACL graft rupture (p ​= ​0.044) compared to PDFS. There was no statistically significant difference in the inter-observer reliability between sequences. The WARP sequence added 2.84 ​± ​0.69 ​min, while SEMAC added 2.95 ​± ​0.40 ​min to the standard knee MRI scan time.

CONCLUSION

use of the SEMAC metal reduction sequence significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and confidence in the detection of ACL graft rupture in cases where the ACL was moderately blurry or indistinct on the PDFS sequence. This sequence should be considered as an adjunct to conventional PDFS in cases where graft visualisation is limited by the metal artifact from fixation devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Tunnel Management in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Current Concepts

Bone tunnel-related complications are frequently encountered during revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Issues with tunnel positioning, enlargement, containment, and hardware interference may complicate surgery and compromise outcomes. As a result, several strategies have emerged to address these issues and optimize results. However, a systematic, unified approach to tunnel pathology in revision ACLR is lacking. The purpose of this review is to highlight the current state of the literature on bone tunnel complications and, although extensive literature on the subject is lacking, present an updated approach to the evaluation and management of tunnel-related issues in revision ACLR.

A balance between native footprint coverage and overlap of the anterolateral meniscal root in tibial tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 3D MRI study

BACKGROUND

Tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is situated close to the anterior lateral meniscal root (ALMR) attachment.

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of the size and location of the tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction on the ACL footprint coverage and overlap to the ALMR.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty knee MRI scans from twenty healthy subjects were recruited, and three-dimensional (3D) tibia models were created to show the tibial attachment sites of ACL and ALMR. Surgical simulation of the tibial tunnel drilling was performed on each 3D model, entering the joint at an angle set at 60 degrees from the tibial plateau plane and 55 degrees from the posterior tibial condylar axis, with analysis for six different drill sizes; 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5 and 10 mm; and nine locations; the center of the ACL attachment and eight locations 2% of the tibial width apart surrounding it. The width of the tibial plateau, the distance between ACL and ALMR attachment centers, and the size and location of the potential tibial tunnel were evaluated to determine association with the area of the ACL footprint coverage and ALMR overlap using a linear mixed effects model.

RESULTS

A large tunnel (p <.001), a central and anterior location (p <.029), and small tibial width (p =.015) were all associated with larger coverage of the ACL footprint. A large tunnel (p <.001), posteriorly and laterally located (p ≤ 0.001), and a small distance between the ACL and ALMR centers (p =.001) were significantly associated with a larger ALMR overlap. The association of the tunnel size to ALMR overlap reduced with a medial tunnel location.

CONCLUSIONS

The short distance between the centers of the ALMR attachment and native ACL footprint suggests that the ALMR will always be susceptible to overlap when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction. Small alterations in tunnel location can lead to a statistically significant alteration with the amount of ALMR overlap. To minimize this overlap, whilst maintaining acceptable coverage of the ACL footprint, a tibial tunnel positioned in a medial or anteromedial location from the center of the ACL footprint is recommended.

Transepicondylar distance measured on MRI can predict the length of the graft required for different anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) techniques useful for revision surgery

Background

The aim of this study is to find a correlation between linear measurements and the graft length required for different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision techniques, to extract formulas to predict required graft length during the preoperative planning.

Methods

At time 0 and 30 days later, two observers measured eight linear distances on standard 2D knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nine curved distances on 3D MRI sequences, corresponding to different techniques for ACL revision, anatomic anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction, and lateral extrarticular tenodesis (LET). Intra- and interobserver reliability was tested for 2D and 3D measurements. The correlation between 2D and 3D measurements was tested. The 2D measurements with highest repeatability and reproducibility, and with strongest correlation with 3D measurements were used to extract formulas to calculate the graft length from 2D values.

Results

Fifty MRIs acquired with both 2D and 3D sequences were used. The intra- and interobserver reliability of linear 2D measurement was high, with the transepicondylar distance (TD) showing the highest reproducibility and repeatability. The intra- and interobserver reliability of 3D measurements was lower than 2D, but acceptable for all measurements except for ALL reconstruction. The TD showed the strongest correlation with 3D measurements. The formulas extracted to calculate the graft length from the TD proved to be accurate.

Conclusion

Accurate formulas were created to calculate the graft length needed for different ACL revision techniques and ALL reconstruction/LET techniques from TD. These formulas can be used during preoperative planning of ACL revision cases.

Arthroscopic Bone Graft Technique for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure, with 2-stage surgery often required to address large bone defects and malpositioned tunnels. The arthroscopic bone grafting technique described herein uses morselized allograft bone to provide reproducible fill of asymmetrical bone defects without autograft harvest or additional loss of native bone. The second stage of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can typically proceed 6 months following bone grafting.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Hamstring Graft Healing and Integration 1 and Minimum 2 Years after ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

An increase has been seen in the number of studies of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) that use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an outcome measure and proxy for healing and integration of the reconstruction graft. Despite this, the MRI appearance of a steady-state graft and how long it takes to achieve such an appearance have not yet been established.

PURPOSE

To establish whether a hamstring tendon autograft for ACLR changes in appearance on MRI scans between 1 and 2 years and whether this change affects a patient's ability to return to sports.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients with hamstring tendon autograft ACLR underwent MRI and clinical outcome measures at 1 year and at a final follow-up of at least 2 years. MRI graft signal was measured at multiple regions of interest using oblique reconstructions both parallel and perpendicular to the graft, with lower signal indicative of better healing and expressed as the signal intensity ratio (SIR). Changes in tunnel aperture areas were also measured. Clinical outcomes were side-to-side anterior laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients were included. At 1 year, the mean SIR for the graft was 2.7 ± 1.2. Graft SIR of the femoral aperture was significantly higher than that of the tibial aperture (3.4 ± 1.3 vs 2.6 ± 1.8, respectively; P = .022). Overall, no significant change was seen on MRI scans after 2 years; a proximal graft SIR of 1.9 provided a sensitivity of 96% to remain unchanged. However, in the 6 patients with the highest proximal graft SIR (>4) at 1 year, a significant reduction in signal was seen at final follow-up (P = .026), alongside an improvement in sporting level. A significant reduction in aperture area was also seen between 1 and 2 years (tibial, -6.3 mm², P < .001; femoral, -13.3 mm², P < .001), which was more marked in the group with proximal graft SIR >4 at 1 year and correlated with a reduction in graft signal. The patients had a high sporting level; the median Tegner activity score was 6 (range, 5-10), and a third of patients scored either 9 or 10. Overall, PROMs and knee laxity were not associated with MRI appearance.

CONCLUSION

In the majority of patients, graft SIR on MRI did not change significantly after 1 year, and a proximal graft SIR <2 was a sensitive indicator for a stable graft signal, implying healing. Monitoring is proposed for patients who have a high signal at 1 year (proximal graft SIR >4), because a significant reduction in signal was seen in the second year, indicative of ongoing healing, alongside an improvement in sporting level. A reduction in tunnel aperture area correlated with a reduction in graft SIR, suggesting this could also be a useful measure of graft integration.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1 Year After Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Can Identify Those at Higher Risk of Graft Failure: An Analysis of 250 Cases

BACKGROUND

There is currently no analysis of 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that reproducibly evaluates the graft of a hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and helps to identify who is at a higher risk of graft rupture upon return to pivoting sports.

PURPOSE

To ascertain whether a novel MRI analysis of ACLR at 1 year postoperatively can be used to predict graft rupture, sporting level, and clinical outcome at a 1-year and minimum 2-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Graft healing and integration after hamstring autograft ACLR were evaluated using the MRI signal intensity ratio at multiple areas using oblique reconstructions both parallel and perpendicular to the graft and tunnel apertures. Clinical outcomes were assessment of side-to-side laxity and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Lysholm, and Tegner activity level scores at 1 year. Repeat outcome measures and detection of graft rupture were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients (42.4% female) underwent MRI analysis at 1 year, and assessment of 211 patients between 1 year and the final follow-up (range, 24-36 months) detected 9 graft ruptures (4.3%; 5 in female patients). A significant predictor for graft rupture was a high signal parallel to the proximal intra-articular graft and perpendicular to the femoral tunnel aperture (P = .032 and P = .049, respectively), with each proximal graft signal intensity ratio (SIR) increase by 1 corresponding to a 40% increased risk of graft rupture. A cutoff SIR of 4 had a sensitivity and specificity of 66% and 77%, respectively, in the proximal graft and 88% and 60% in the femoral aperture. In all patients, graft signal adjacent to and within the tibial tunnel aperture, and in the mid intra-articular portion, was significantly lower than that for the femoral aperture (P < .001). A significant correlation was seen between the appearance of higher graft signal on MRI and those patients achieving top sporting levels by 1 year.

CONCLUSION

ACLR graft rupture after 1 year is associated with MRI appearances of high graft signal adjacent to and within the femoral tunnel aperture. Patients with aspirations of quickly returning to a high sporting level may benefit from MRI analysis of graft signal. Graft signal was highest at the femoral tunnel aperture, adding further radiographic evidence that the rate-limiting step to graft healing occurs proximally.

Adjustable suspension versus hybrid fixation in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There has been increased use of adjustable suspensory fixation (ASF) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Potential benefits are the ability to use a shorter graft and to prevent graft displacement and damage. The purpose of this study was to establish the efficacy of this fixation method and assess whether it leads to less tunnel widening, and avoids known complications of screw fixation.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients who underwent ACLR with ASF on both the femoral and tibial sides met the inclusion criteria and were propensity matched demographically with 38 patients who underwent hybrid fixation with femoral suspensory and tibial screw and sheath. At one-year, KT-1000 knee laxity measurements were recorded and detailed MRI analysis looking at tunnel aperture widening, tunnel appearance, graft integration within the tunnels, and graft healing.

RESULTS

MRI comparison between ASF and hybrid cohorts revealed no significant differences in graft signal or integration, and clinically there were no differences in knee laxity between cohorts (mean 1.5 mm ± 2.0 and 1.5 mm ± 2.3 (n.s.) in the ASF and hybrid fixation respectively). Significantly less aperture tibial tunnel widening (2.2 mm versus 4.4 mm, p < 0.0001) and tibial cysts (2 versus 9, p = 0.047) were observed in the ASF cohort, whilst mean femoral tunnel widening was comparable between both cohorts (ASF 2.8 mm, hybrid 3.2 mm; n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Hamstring autografts for ACLR fixed using either ASF or a hybrid fixation technique provided comparable knee stability and MRI graft signal intensity. Tibial ASF demonstrated significantly less tibial aperture widening and tunnel cyst formation when compared to screw and sheath fixation.

Lateral tenodesis procedures increase lateral compartment pressures more than anterolateral ligament reconstruction, when performed in combination with ACL reconstruction: a pilot biomechanical study

OBJECTIVES

Given the common occurrence of residual laxity and re-injury post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), additional anterolateral procedures are increasingly used in combination with an ACLR. Despite the perception that there is a risk of over-constraining the lateral tibiofemoral (LTF) compartment, potentially leading to osteoarthritis, assessment on their effect on intra-articular compartment pressures is still lacking. Our objective was therefore, through a pilot biomechanical study, to compare LTF contact pressures after the most commonly used anterolateral procedures.

METHODS

A controlled laboratory pilot study was performed using 4 fresh-frozen cadaveric whole lower limbs. Through 0° to 90° of flexion, LTF contact pressures were measured with a Tekscan sensor, located under the lateral meniscus. Knee kinematics were obtained in 3 conditions of rotation (NR: neutral, ER: external and IR: internal rotation) to record the position of the knees for each loading condition. A Motion Analysis system with a coordinate system based on CT scans 3D bone modelling was used. After an ACLR, defined as the reference baseline, 5 anterolateral procedures were compared: anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), modified Ellison, deep Lemaire, superficial Lemaire and modified MacIntosh procedures. The last 3 procedures were randomised. For each procedure, the graft was fixed in NR at 30° of flexion and with a tension of 20 N.

RESULTS

Compared with isolated ACLR, addition of either ALLR or modified Ellison procedure did not increased the overall LTF contact pressure (all p>0.05) through the full range of flexion for the IR condition. Conversely, deep Lemaire, superficial Lemaire and modified MacIntosh procedure (all p<0.05) did increase the overall LTF contact pressure compared with ACLR in IR. No significant difference was observed in ER and NR conditions.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study, comparing the main anterolateral procedures, revealed that addition of either ALLR or modified Ellison procedure did not change the overall contact pressure in the LTF compartment through 0° to 90° of knee flexion. In contrast, the deep and superficial Lemaire, and modified MacIntosh procedures significantly increased overall LTF contact pressures when the knee was internally rotated.

Different anterolateral procedures have variable impact on knee kinematics and stability when performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The optimal anterolateral procedure to control anterolateral rotational laxity of the knee is still unknown. The objective was to compare the ability of five anterolateral procedures performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to restore native knee kinematics in the setting of a deficient anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral structures.

METHODS

A controlled laboratory study was performed using 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric whole lower limbs with intact iliotibial band. Kinematics from 0° to 90° of flexion were recorded using a motion analysis three-dimensional (3D) optoelectronic system, allowing assessment of internal rotation (IR) and anteroposterior (AP) tibial translation at 30° and 90° of flexion. Joint centres and bony landmarks were calculated from 3D bone models obtained from CT scans. Intact knee kinematics were assessed initially, followed by sequential section of the ACL and anterolateral structures (anterolateral ligament, anterolateral capsule and Kaplan fibres). After ACLR, five anterolateral procedures were performed consecutively on the same knee: ALLR, modified Ellison, deep Lemaire, superficial Lemaire and modified MacIntosh. The last three procedures were randomised. For each procedure, the graft was fixed in neutral rotation at 30° of flexion and with a tension of 20 N.

RESULTS

Isolated ACLR did not restore normal overall knee kinematics in a combined ACL plus anterolateral-deficient knee, leaving a residual tibial rotational laxity (p=0.034). Only the ALLR (p=0.661) and modified Ellison procedure (p=0.641) restored overall IR kinematics to the normal intact state. Superficial and deep Lemaire and modified MacIntosh tenodeses overconstrained IR, leading to shifted and different kinematics compared with the intact condition (p=0.004, p=0.001 and p=0.045, respectively). Compared with ACLR state, addition of an anterolateral procedure did not induce any additional control on AP translation at 30° and 90° of flexion (all p>0.05), except for the superficial Lemaire procedure at 90° (p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

In biomechanical in vitro setting, a comparison of five anterolateral procedures revealed that addition of either ALLR or modified Ellison procedure restored overall native knee kinematics in a combined ACL plus anterolateral-deficient knee. Superficial and deep Lemaire and modified MacIntosh tenodeses achieved excellent rotational control but overconstrained IR, leading to a change from intact knee kinematics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

The level-of-evidence statement does not apply for this laboratory experiments study.

Positioning of the Tibial Tunnel After Single-Bundle ACL Primary Reconstruction on 3D CT scans: A New Method

Purpose

To assess intra-articular tunnel aperture positioning after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either the reference standard method or the intercondylar area method in a single center using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the intra-articular position of the tibial tunnel relative to the ACL footprint.

Methods

3D CT scans were performed after 120 single-bundle primary ACL reconstruction cases. The center of the tibial tunnel aperture and the center of the ACL footprint were referenced on axial views of the tibial plateau in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) planes according to a centimetric grid system including the whole plateau (reference standard). This was compared with a grid system based on intercondylar area bony anatomy. The posterior aspect of intertubercular fossa, anterior aspect of the tibial plateau, medial intercondylar ridge, and crossing point between lateral intercondylar ridge and posterior margin were used as landmarks to define the grid.

Results

According to the reference standard method, the center of the tibial tunnel aperture was positioned 0.57 ± 2.62 mm more posterior and 0.67 ± 1.55 mm more medial than the center of the footprint. According to the intercondylar area method, the center of the tibial tunnel aperture was positioned 1.32 ± 2.74 mm more posterior and 0.66 ± 1.56 mm more medial than the center of the footprint. The position difference between the center of the tunnel aperture and the center of the footprint were statistically correlated for both grids, with r = –0.887, P < .001 for AP positioning and r = 0.615, P < .001 for ML positioning.

Conclusion

This intercondylar area method using arthroscopic landmarks can be used to assess tunnel placement on 3D CT scans after ACL reconstruction.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective comparative study.

The space available for the anterior cruciate ligament in the intercondylar notch is less in patients with ACL injury

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine if a difference exists in the relationship between the femoral intercondylar notch volume, and the volumes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in ACL injured patients and healthy subjects.

METHODS

Intact knees of 19 healthy subjects and bilateral knees of 18 ipsilateral ACL reconstructed patients were scanned using 3-tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. The intercondylar notch, ACL, PCL and hamstring graft were segmented using three-dimensional (3D) processing software. The native intercondylar notch, ACL, and PCL volumes were compared between both groups. The volumes of native ACL and graft were compared in ACL injured patients.

RESULTS

The following volumes showed no significant differences between the ACL injured group and control group; intercondylar notch (9.9 ± 2.3 vs 9.6 ± 1.7 cm³), ACL (2.4 ± 0.7 vs 2.4 ± 0.6 cm³) and PCL (3.9 ± 1.0 vs 3.4 ± 0.8 cm³), and the ratio of the ACL to the intercondylar notch (24.6 ± 5.0 vs 25.4 ± 2.9%). There was a significant difference in the ratio of PCL to the intercondylar notch (39.1 ± 4.3 vs 35.9 ± 4.9%, p = 0.023). The graft was significantly larger than native ACL volume (3.0 ± 0.7 vs 2.4 ± 0.7 cm³, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The ratio of the PCL volume in the femoral intercondylar notch was higher in the ACL injured group compared to the healthy control group, despite the ratio of ACL volume in the femoral intercondylar notch being similar in both groups. A greater awareness of the potentially limited space for the graft alongside the PCL within the femoral intercondylar notch may allow surgeons a more informed choice of graft type and size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

ACL hamstring grafts fixed using adjustable cortical suspension in both the femur and tibia demonstrate healing and integration on MRI at one year

PURPOSE

To present the clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of adjustable cortical suspensory fixation for the femur and tibia in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A cohort of 233 sequential patients was analysed for graft failure rate and subjective IKDC, Tegner and Lysholm scores. 144 validated 1-year MRIs assessed and correlated graft healing and tunnel widening.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up of 28 months ± 8.2 [median 26, range 12-49], the graft failure rate was 4.7%. Significant improvements were seen in all clinical scores (p < 0.001). MRI analysis showed 71% with fully integrated grafts in the tibia and 24% in the femur, with the remainder all showing greater than 50% integration. Graft signal was low and homogenous in 67% in the tibia, 29% in the intra-articular portion and 20% in the femur. One patient had greater than 50% high signal in the tibial graft and one in the intra-articular graft, all others demonstrated greater than 50% low signal. Both graft integration and signal were significantly better in the tibia than the femur (p < 0.01). Tunnel widening was 2.2 ± 1.4 mm and 2.7 ± 1.3 mm in the tibia and femur, respectively. Comparison of individual MRI appearances and overall clinical outcome at the same 12-month point demonstrated no consistent significant correlation.

CONCLUSION

Adjustable cortical suspensory fixation in both femoral and tibial tunnels provides good clinical outcomes and a low graft rupture rate. Grafts demonstrate healing with comparatively low tunnel widening. There was no consistent significant correlation between the appearances on MRI and clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, Level III.

Graft Size and Orientation Within the Femoral Notch Affect Graft Healing at 1 Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The combined influence of anatomic and operative factors affecting graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction within the femoral notch is not well understood.

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of graft size and orientation in relation to femoral notch anatomy, with the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the graft used as a measure of graft healing after primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts were included. Graft healing was evaluated at 1 year on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan as the mean SNQ measured from 3 regions situated at sites at the proximal, middle, and distal graft. Patient characteristics, chondropenia severity score, tunnel sizes, tunnel locations, graft bending angle (GBA), graft sagittal angle, posterior tibial slope (PTS), graft length, graft volume, femoral notch volume, and graft-notch volume ratio (measured using postoperative 3-T high-resolution MRI) were evaluated to determine any association with 1-year graft healing. The correlation between 1-year graft healing and clinical outcome at minimum 2 years was also assessed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mean SNQ between male and female patients (P > .05). Univariate regression analysis showed that a low femoral tunnel (P = .005), lateral tibial tunnel (P = .009), large femoral tunnel (P = .011), large tibial tunnel (P < .001), steep lateral PTS (P = .010), steep medial PTS (P = .004), acute graft sagittal angle (P < .001), acute GBA (P < .001), large graft volume (P = .003), and high graft-notch volume ratio (P < .001) were all associated with higher graft SNQ values. A multivariate regression analysis showed 2 significant factors: a large graft-notch volume ratio (P = .001) and an acute GBA (P = .004). The 1-year SNQ had a weak correlation with 2-year Tegner Activity Scale score (r = 0.227; P = .026) but no other clinical findings, such as International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and Lysholm scores and anterior tibial translation side-to-side difference.

CONCLUSION

The 1-year SNQ value had a significant positive association with graft-notch volume ratio and GBA. Both graft size and graft orientation appeared to have a significant influence on graft healing as assessed on 1-year high-resolution MRI scan.

Relationship between anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral meniscal root bony attachment: High-resolution 3-T MRI analysis

BACKGROUND

The tibial bony attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) are very close, and drilling the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction may damage the ALMR attachment. This study investigated the relationship between the tibial attachment of the ACL and ALMR using high-resolution 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects (35.8 ± 13.0 years) had 20 knees scanned using high resolution 3-T MRI. The tibial bony attachments of ACL, ALMR, and the tibia were segmented and three-dimensional models were created. The shape, area, and location of each attachment were evaluated using this model.

RESULTS

The ACL tibial attachment was elliptical in nine knees (45%), C-shaped in nine knees (45%) and triangle in two knees (10%). The mean values of the ACL vs ALMR tibial attachments were as follows: area, 106.2 ± 21.3 vs 56.2 ± 21.3 mm²; length, 16.8 ± 2.0 vs 11.0 ± 1.8 mm; and width, 6.9 ± 1.3 vs 6.6 ± 1.0 mm. The location of the ACL vs ALMR attachment centres was 46.5 ± 1.7% vs 56.5 ± 1.9% in the medial-lateral direction and 36.3 ± 3.6% vs 36.7 ± 3.5% in the anterior-posterior direction. The distance between the ACL and ALMR centres was 8.1 ± 1.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL and ALMR tibial attachments were individually distinguished using high resolution 3-T MRI. The short distance between both centres of the attachments may suggest that ALMR can be damaged when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction.

Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements

Background:

The anatomic placement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts is often assessed with postoperative imaging. In clinical practice, graft angles are measured to indicate anatomic placement on magnetic resonance imaging, whereas grid measurements are performed on computed tomography (CT). Recently, a study indicated that graft angle measurements could also be assessed on CT. No consensus has yet been reached on which measurement method is best suited to assess anatomic graft placement.

Purpose:

To compare the ability of grid measurements and angle measurements to identify anatomic versus nonanatomic tunnel placement on CT performed in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A total of 100 knees undergoing primary reconstruction with a hamstring graft (HAM group), 91 undergoing reconstruction with a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft (BPTB group), and 117 undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (REV group) were assessed with CT. Grid measurements of the femoral and tibial tunnels and angle measurements of grafts were performed. Graft placement, rated as anatomic or nonanatomic, was assessed with both methods. Pearson chi-square, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and weighted kappa tests were performed as appropriate.

Results:

The grid assessment classified 10% of the HAM group, 4% of the BPTB group, and 17% of the REV group as nonanatomic (P < .001). The angle assessment classified 37% of the HAM group, 54% of the BPTB group, and 47% of the REV group as nonanatomic. The weighted kappa between angle measurements and grid measurements was low in all groups (HAM: 0.009; BPTB: 0.065; REV: 0.041).

Conclusion:

The agreement between grid measurements and angle measurements was very low. The angle measurements seemed to overestimate nonanatomic tunnel placement. Grid measurements were better in identifying malpositioned grafts.