Zhao BYH, Khan NA, Wichuk S, Sommerfeldt MF, Panu A, Jaremko JL, Hui C. The use of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) sequencing improves the diagnostic evaluation of graft integrity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
J ISAKOS 2023;
8:318-324. [PMID:
37127091 DOI:
10.1016/j.jisako.2023.04.006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with metal artifact reduction sequencing is superior to conventional knee MRI in the evaluation of an injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft, where visualisation on conventional MRI can be limited by the metal artifact from fixation devices.
METHODS
Eighteen patients underwent conventional MRI sequence (proton density fat saturated [PDFS]) and two types of metal artifact reduction sequencing MRI (WARP, slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC); Siemens) following a secondary injury to their ACL reconstructed knee. Six raters with experience in knee MRI evaluation reviewed sagittal PDFS, WARP, and SEMAC sequences, providing semi-quantitative grades for visualisation and diagnostic confidence assessing the ACL, posterior cruciate ligament , menisci, tibial and femoral tunnel margins, and articular cartilage. Intra-class correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability were evaluated. The 6-rater mean scores for the visualisation and diagnostic confidence derived from each sequence were compared using the Friedman test for multiple paired samples.
RESULTS
No statistically significant difference in the ACL visualisation among the sequences was found (p = 0.193). Further, a subgroup analysis was performed in cases evaluated as "moderately blurry" or "indistinct ACL visualisation" on PDFS (58% of cases). SEMAC significantly improved diagnostic confidence in ACL visualisation (p = 0.041) and ACL graft rupture (p = 0.044) compared to PDFS. There was no statistically significant difference in the inter-observer reliability between sequences. The WARP sequence added 2.84 ± 0.69 min, while SEMAC added 2.95 ± 0.40 min to the standard knee MRI scan time.
CONCLUSION
use of the SEMAC metal reduction sequence significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and confidence in the detection of ACL graft rupture in cases where the ACL was moderately blurry or indistinct on the PDFS sequence. This sequence should be considered as an adjunct to conventional PDFS in cases where graft visualisation is limited by the metal artifact from fixation devices.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III.
Collapse