Suture Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmosis Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A 3-Ligament Syndesmotic Injury Is at Higher Risk for Malreduction Than a 2-Ligament Injury: A CT-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

Syndesmotic malreduction is common and has been associated to an impaired outcome. Various risk factors for DTFJ malreduction have been postulated. The aims of this study were to assess the DTFJ malreduction rate based on (1) the severity of the syndesmotic injury, (2) the anatomy of the tibial incisura, and (3) the fixation device used in patients treated with suture-button systems.

METHODS

This retrospective, radiographic study included all adult patients who were treated for an acute, unilateral, and unstable syndesmotic injury with a suture-button system and postoperative bilateral CT imaging. Included were isolated syndesmotic injuries and fracture cases. The number of syndesmotic ligaments injured, that is, 2-ligament (AiTFL+IOL) and 3-ligament (AiTFL+IOL+PiTFL), was rated for each patient. The quality of DTFJ reduction, as well as the anatomy of the tibial incisura, was rated based on the postoperative, bilateral CT images and the intraoperative DTFJ reduction was recalculated based on the drilling-tunnel deviation. The possible influence on the DTFJ malreduction rate was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were included, and 94 and 53 patients had a 2- and 3-ligament syndesmotic injury, respectively. In addition, 113 patients were treated with a single-button system, 26 with a double suture-button system, and 8 with a hybrid fixation (suture-button + screw). Malreduction was significantly higher in 3-ligament compared with 2-ligament injuries, both intraoperatively (51% vs 27%; P = .003) and postoperatively (28% vs 11%; P = .006). The tibial anatomy had no significant influence on the malreduction rates. No significant differences were seen per the different fixation devices used independent of the number of ligaments injured.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find an influence of the incisura's anatomy on the DTFJ malreduction rate. However, we did find that 3-ligament syndesmotic injuries carried a higher risk of intra- and postoperative malreduction compared with 2-ligament injuries.

The Use of Knotless Suture Tape Construct vs Screw Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Lisfranc injuries are often treated with open reduction and internal fixation using rigid fixation techniques. The use of flexible fixation to stabilize the Lisfranc joint is a newer technique. The purpose of this cadaveric study is to compare the amount of diastasis at the Lisfranc interval under diminished physiologic loads when treated with a knotless suture tape construct and a solid screw.

METHODS

Ten cadavers (20 feet) had native motion at the intact Lisfranc interval assessed at multiple increasing loads (69, 138, and 207 N). The Lisfranc ligamentous complex was then disrupted, and testing repeated to evaluate the amount of diastasis. Randomization was performed to determine the type of fixation for each cadaver: solid screw or knotless suture tape construct. Once fixation was completed, specimens were cyclically loaded for 10 000 cycles at loads, and diastasis was quantified after each load cycle to compare the interventions. Diastasis was measured using motion tracking cameras and retroreflective marker sets. A non-inferiority statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Diastasis mean values were confirmed to be >2 mm for all load bearing conditions in the injury model. Posttreatment, diastasis was significantly reduced when compared to the sectioned conditions (P < .01) for both treatment options. Non-inferiority analyses showed that the knotless suture tape construct did not perform inferior to screw fixation for diastasis at the Lisfranc interval at any of the compared load states.

CONCLUSION

Under the loads tested, there is no significant difference in diastasis at the Lisfranc interval when treating ligamentous Lisfranc injuries with a knotless suture tape construct or solid screws. Both reduced diastasis from the injured state and were not different from the intact state.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this cadaveric model with ligamentous Lisfranc injury, diastasis of a knotless suture tape construct is compared to solid screw fixation as tested.

Clinical and Radiographic Results After Treatment of Traumatic Syndesmotic Instability Using a Novel Screw-Suture Syndesmotic Fixation Device

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to report early outcomes of a novel screw-suture syndesmotic device compared with suture button fixation devices when treating traumatic syndesmotic instability.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Single academic Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

All adult patients who had syndesmotic fixation with the novel device [novel syndesmotic repair implant (NSRI) group] compared with a suture button device (SB group) between January 2018 and December 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Medial clear space and tibiofibular overlap measurements were compared immediately postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year or skeletal healing.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (25 female) with an average age of 47 years (range 19-78 years) were in the NSRI group compared with 52 patients (20 female) with an average age of 41 years (range 18-73 years) in the SB group. There were no significant differences when comparing body mass index, diabetes, or smoking status between groups (P > 0.05). There was no difference when comparing the postoperative and final medial clear space measurements in the NSRI group compared with the SB group (P = 0.86; 95% confidence interval, -0.32 to 0.27). There was no difference when comparing the postoperative and final tibiofibular overlap measurements in the NSRI group compared with the SB group (P = 0.79; 95% confidence interval, -0.072 to 0.09). There were 3 cases of implant removal in the NSRI group compared with 2 in the SB group (P = 0.77). There was 1 failure in the NSRI group and none in the SB group. The remaining patients were all fully ambulatory at the final follow-up (P = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel screw-suture syndesmotic implant provides the fixation of a screw, and the flexibility of a suture had similar radiographic outcomes compared with suture button fixation devices in treating ankle syndesmotic instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical Outcomes of Syndesmotic Fixation of Ankle Fractures Using Syndesmotic Screws Versus Suture Button Devices

INTRODUCTION

Ankle fractures associated with disruption of the syndesmotic complex could potentially have poorer outcomes if missed or malreduced at the time of surgery. Favourable results have been reported for the suture button (SB) technique and may provide advantages over standard screw fixation of the syndesmosis, although this remains the gold standard method in many units.

AIM

To compare the outcomes of syndesmotic screws (SS) with SB fixation of the syndesmosis during ankle fracture fixation at a high-volume orthopaedic department of a Scotland trauma unit.

METHOD

 A cross-sectional, retrospective study looking at ankle fracture fixations was undertaken at the Clyde Trauma Unit, Paisley. Relevant information was obtained from electronic patient records for 457 ankle fracture patients between August 2019 and February 2022 and followed up for six months. The digital patient archive system (PACS) was used for evaluating radiographs. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they had an SS or SB fixation of their syndesmosis. We focused on the surgical and radiological outcomes following syndesmotic fixation as no functional scores following surgery were conducted on the patients.

RESULT

Out of the entire study group, 26.3% (120/457 patients) required syndesmotic fixation. Within the syndesmotic fixation group, 70.8% (85/120 patients) underwent SS fixation, and 29.2% (35/120 patients) had an SB fixation. Both groups were statistically well-matched. Additionally, 21.1% (18/85) of SS fixation went on to have a second surgical procedure (four fixation failures, five planned removals, five for pain/stiffness, two infections, and two metalwork breakage/migration), whereas 8.6% (3/35) of the SB fixation group had a secondary procedure - two for fixation failures and one for infection.

CONCLUSION

We reported a higher incidence of associated syndesmotic injury in our series of 457 ankle fractures than previously described. There were significantly fewer sequelae in the SB group compared to the SS fixation group (P = 0.0464). Although we did not observe a statistically significant difference in the rate of reoperation (P = 0.1184), this is likely due to the small numbers in the SB group. Our study suggests that SB fixation may be associated with a lower rate of reoperation for post-op complications such as metalwork failure, pain, and stiffness (21.1% SS vs 8.6% SB). Regardless of the fixation method used, accurate reduction of the ankle mortice and syndesmosis is a key step to a successful surgical outcome.

Better outcomes using suture button compared to screw fixation in talofibular syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: a level I evidence-based meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The present meta-analysis evaluated current level I clinical trials which compared the use of a suture button (SB) versus syndesmotic screw (SS) fixation techniques for syndesmosis injuries of the ankle. The outcomes of interest were to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications. It was hypothesised that SB might achieve better PROMs along with a lower rate of complications.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. In August 2023, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed. All the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared SB versus SS fixation for syndesmosis injuries of the ankle were accessed. Data concerning the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Olerud-Molander score (OMS) were collected at baseline and at last follow-up. Data on implant failure, implant removal, and joint malreduction were also retrieved.

RESULTS

Data from seven RCTs (490 patients) were collected. 33% (161 of 490) were women. The mean length of the follow-up was 30.8 ± 27.4 months. The mean age of the patients was 41.1 ± 4.1 years. Between the two groups (SB and SS), comparability was found in the mean age, and men:women ratio. The SS group evidenced lower OMS (P = 0.0006) and lower AOFAS (P = 0.03). The SS group evidenced a greater rate of implant failure (P = 0.0003), implant removal (P = 0.0005), and malreduction (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Suture button fixation might perform better than the syndesmotic screw fixation in syndesmotic injuries of the ankle.

Syndesmotic Suture Button Fixation Results in Higher Tegner Activity Scale Scores When Compared to Screw Fixation: A Multicenter Investigation

BACKGROUND

Suture buttons and metal screws have been used and compared in biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical outcome studies for syndesmotic injuries, with neither implant demonstrating clear superiority. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of both implants.

METHODS

Patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation at 2 separate academic centers from 2010 through 2017 were compared. Thirty-one patients treated with a suture button and 21 patients treated with screws were included. Patients in each group were matched by age, sex, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classification. Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), patient satisfaction score, surgical failure, and reoperation rates were compared.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent suture button fixation had significantly higher TAS scores than those who underwent screw fixation (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in FAAM ADL scores between cohorts (p = 0.08). Symptomatic hardware removal rates were similar (3.2% suture button cohort vs 9.0% in screw cohort). One patient (4.5%) underwent revision surgery secondary to syndesmotic malreduction after screw fixation, for a reoperation rate of 13.5%.

CONCLUSION

Patients with unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with suture button fixation had higher mean TAS scores compared to patients treated with screws. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and ADL scores in these cohorts were similar.Level of Evidence: Level 3 Retrospective Matched Case-Cohort.

Effect of Distal Tibiofibular Destabilization and Syndesmosis Compression on the Flexibility Kinematics of the Ankle Bones: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model

Background

Overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture may affect multidirectional flexibility of the ankle bones.

Methods

Ten cadaveric lower limbs (78.3±13.0 years, 4 female, 6 male) underwent biomechanical testing in sagittal, coronal, and axial rotation with degrees of motion quantified. The intact force (100%) was the force needed to compress the syndesmosis just beyond the intact position, and overcompression was defined as 150% of the intact force. After intact testing, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), interosseus membrane (IOM), and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) were sectioned and testing was repeated. The IOM and AITFL were reconstructed in sequence and tested at 100% and 150% compression.

Results

Overcompression of the syndesmosis did not significantly reduce ROM of the ankle bones for any loading modality (P > .05). IOM+AITFL reconstruction restored distal tibiofibular axial rotation to the intact condition. Axial rotation motion was significantly lower with AITFL fixation compared with IOM fixation alone (P < .05). The proximal tibiofibular syndesmosis demonstrated significantly higher motion in axial rotation with all distal reconstruction conditions.

Conclusion

As assessed by direct visualization, overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis did not reduce ROM of the ankle bones. Distal tibiofibular axial rotation was significantly lower with IOM+AITFL fixation compared with IOM augmentation alone. Distal tibiofibular axial rotation did not differ significantly from the intact condition after combined IOM+AITFL fixation. Dynamic fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis resulted in increased axial rotation at the proximal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Clinical Relevance

These biomechanical data suggest that inadvertent overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis when fixing ankle fractures does not restrict subsequent ankle bone ROM. The AITFL is an important stabilizer of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in external rotation.

Level of Evidence

controlled laboratory study.

All-suture fixation of syndesmotic injuries: a case series

BACKGROUND

To retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients treated for syndesmotic injuries with an all-suture construct technique and compare their patient reported outcome scores with historically published outcomes of syndesmotic injuries fixed with suspensory suture buttons.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of patients treated at a Level 1 Trauma Center from May 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022. Ten patients aged 18 and older with unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with all-suture repair. Patients were excluded if they were treated with trans-osseous screws, had previous failed syndesmotic fixation, or suspensory suture button fixation. Patient-reported outcomes including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot scores, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

In the patients with 6 weeks or more of radiographic follow-up (N = 9), there was no evidence of nonunion, loss of fixation, hardware complication, or whitling of the fibula by the suture. At final follow-up average VAS pain scores were 1.5 out of 10 (range 0-4; SD 1.2), AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores averaged 89.6 out of 100 (range 86-100; SD 6.1). The pain subscale of the AOFAS score averaged 37.5 out of 40 (range 35-40; SD 2.5). The functional subscale of the AOFAS score averaged 46 out of 50 (range 44-50; SD 3.0). Stiffness was reported in one patient at their follow-up visits, which resolved with continued physical therapy. There were no superficial or deep infections.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this case series presents the first clinical outcomes of an all-suture fixation technique for treatment of unstable syndesmotic ankle injuries. Our results suggest that the all-suture fixation technique results in similar patient reported outcomes when compared with historically reported patient reported outcomes of suspensory suture button fixation, and low rates of complication or hardware failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4

Center-Center Surgical Technique With Dynamic Syndesmosis Fixation: A Cadaveric Pilot Study

The objective of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to evaluate if the center-center surgical technique is a reliable and repeatable method of achieving proper syndesmotic reduction when using dynamic syndesmotic fixation. Nine fresh frozen above-knee cadaveric lower extremities were used. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were first obtained for each intact specimen as the baseline for comparison. A simulated complete syndesmotic disruption was created by transection of all deltoid and syndesmotic ligaments. Instability of the ankle was confirmed with stress imaging using fluoroscopy. Each unstable specimen was repaired using the center-center surgical technique with dynamic syndesmosis fixation. A series of measurements from the axial CT images of intact and repaired specimens were used to determine the anatomic distal tibiofibular relationships for comparison of changes from intact to postfixation. All radiographic measurements were performed by 4 independent foot and ankle surgeons. The level of inter-rater reliability for all the measurements was found to be "moderate" to "excellent" agreement (ICC value: 0.865-0.983, 95% confidence interval: 0.634-0.996). There was no statistical difference found between rotational alignment of native and postfixation (a/b: p = .843; b-a: p = .125; θ: p = .062). There was a statistical difference detected for lateral alignment at the center of fibularis incisura between native and postfixation (average: -0.6 ± 0.8 mm, range: -2.3 to 1.2 mm, p < .001). There was no statistical difference found for the anteroposterior translation alignment between native and postfixation (d/e: p = .251; f: p = .377). This study demonstrated the use of the center-center surgical technique as a viable and repeatable method for achieving anatomical reduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis when used with dynamic fixation modalities.

Clinical study of a steel cable fixation for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury

BACKGROUND

In order to overcome the shortcomings of common surgical fixation methods for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis (DTS) injuries, which include the inability to exercise early, significant surgical trauma, and the risk of loosening and breakage of implants, we have designed and implemented a new technique using steel cable fixation to treat DTS injuries.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients treated with steel cable fixation for DTS injury between March 2013 and March 2019 in the Second Hospital of Tangshan City trauma department were followed up to monitor the efficacy of treatment. There were 16 males and 10 females between the ages of 19 and 64, with a mean age of 41.81 ± 9.54 years. All patients were examined by X-ray and CT for 3 days before and after surgery. The patients were then reexamined by X-ray 6 and 9 weeks postoperatively, and by CT 1 year later. The treatment results were evaluated by comparing the distal tibiofibular anterior, middle, and posterior gap changes and the Baird-Jackson score.

RESULTS

The 26 patients attained good postoperative repositioning, with a fracture healing time of 2.5 to 3 months. and the Baird-Jackson score was 96 ± 2.78. After surgery, the DTS gaps observed in the CT scans taken 3 days and 1 year postoperatively in all patients were significantly reduced compared to the preoperative measurements, with statistical significance (P < .05). However, when comparing the CT scans taken 1 year postoperatively to those at 3 days postoperatively, there was no significant change in the anterior gap. The middle and posterior gaps of DTS showed a slight increase with statistical significance (P < .05), but all measurements remained within the normal range.

CONCLUSION

Steel cable fixation for DTS injury has the advantages of reliable fixation, early functional exercise, and reduction in the number of operations, and no adverse effects or complications were found.

Current concepts in ankle fractures

Ankle fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries. Operative management is performed in unstable ankle fracture patterns to restore the stability and native kinematics of the ankle mortise and minimize the risk of post-traumatic degenerative changes. In this study, we review current concepts in ankle fracture management, including posterior malleolus fixation, syndesmosis fixation, deltoid ligament repair, fibular nailing, and early weightbearing, from both a biomechanical and clinical perspective.

A Novel Flexible Fixation Method for Syndesmotic Injury

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the results and the safety of a novel fixation method we developed for syndesmosis injuries that we call the "embrace" technique.

METHODS

Between March 2018 and October 2020, a total of 67 patients with ankle fractures and syndesmotic injuries underwent syndesmosis fixation with the embrace technique at our institute. Plain radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative radiographic assessment included anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs and CT scans of both ankles. Additionally, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used for postoperative assessment.

RESULTS

The mean age was 27.6 ± 10.9 (range, 14-56) years. The mean follow-up time was 30.3 ± 6.2 (range, 24-48) months. There were no malreductions indicated by any CT parameter except fibular rotation in a postoperative comparison between 2 sides. We found significant preoperative-postoperative changes in anterior difference, posterior difference, and fibular rotation but no significant preoperative-postoperative difference in fibular translation. There was no significant postoperative difference between the affected-side and normal-side measurements of any parameter. Complications included delayed wound healing, lateral pain because of wire knot irritation (11.9%), and medial fiber wire irritation (7.5%). The mean AOFAS, Olerud-Molander, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were 94.4 ± 6.8 (range, 84-100), 95.4 ± 6.1 (range, 80-100), and 0.68 ± 1.0 (range, 0-3) points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, this novel technique proved to be an effective method for syndesmosis fixation in patients with ankle fractures associated with very good radiologic and patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany

INTRODUCTION

Although non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries of the ankle are relatively rare, they may lead to poor clinical outcome if initially undiagnosed or managed improperly. Despite a variety of literature regarding possibilities for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries, little is known about effective applications of different therapeutic methods in day-to-day work. The aim of this study was to assess the current status of the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online-questionnaire, capturing the routine diagnostic workup including clinical examination, radiologic assessment and treatment strategies, was sent to all members of the German Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (DGOU) and Association of Arthroscopic and Joint Surgery (AGA). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft excel and SPSS.

RESULTS

Each question of the questionnaire was on average answered by 431 ± 113 respondents. External rotation stress test (66%), squeeze test (61%) and forced dorsiflexion test (40%) were most commonly used for the clinical examination. In the diagnostic workup, most clinicians relied on MRI (83%) and conventional X-ray analysis (anterior-posterior 58%, lateral 41%, mortise view 38%). Only 15% of the respondents stated that there is a role for arthroscopic evaluation for the assessment of isolated syndesmotic injuries. Most frequently used fixation techniques included syndesmotic screw fixation (80%, 42% one syndesmotic screw, 38% two syndesmotic screws), followed by suture-button devices in 13%. Syndesmotic screw fixation was mainly performed tricortically (78%). While 50% of the respondents stated that syndesmotic screw fixation and suture-button devices are equivalent in the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries with respect to clinical outcome, 36% answered that syndesmotic screw fixation is superior compared to suture-button devices.

CONCLUSIONS

While arthroscopy and suture-button devices do not appear to be widely used, syndesmotic screw fixation after diagnostic work-up by MRI seems to be the common treatment algorithm for non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries in Germany.

Effect of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability

BACKGROUND

Transsyndesmotic fixation with suture buttons (SBs), posterior malleolar fixation with screws, and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation using suture tape (ST) have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a posterior malleolar fracture (PMF). However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for PMFs.

PURPOSE

To determine which combination of (1) transsyndesmotic SBs, (2) posterior malleolar screws, and (3) AITFL augmentation using ST best restored native tibiofibular and ankle joint kinematics after 25% and 50% PMF.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty cadaveric lower-leg specimens were divided into 2 groups (25% or 50% PMF) and underwent biomechanical testing using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm in 7 states: intact, syndesmosis injury with PMF, transsyndesmotic SBs, transsyndesmotic SBs + AITFL augmentation, transsyndesmotic SBs + AITFL augmentation + posterior malleolar screws, posterior malleolar screws + AITFL augmentation, and posterior malleolar screws. Four biomechanical tests were performed at neutral and 30° of plantarflexion: external rotation, internal rotation, posterior drawer, and lateral drawer. The position of the tibia, fibula, and talus were recorded using a 5-camera motion capture system.

RESULTS

With external rotation, posterior malleolar screws with AITFL augmentation resulted in best stability of the fibula and ankle joint. With internal rotation, all repairs that included posterior malleolar screws stabilized the fibula and ankle joint. Posterior and lateral drawer resulted in only small differences between the intact and injured states. No differences were found in the efficacy of treatments between 25% and 50% PMFs.

CONCLUSION

Posterior malleolar screws resulted in higher syndesmotic stability when compared with transsyndesmotic SBs. AITFL augmentation provided additional external rotational stability when combined with posterior malleolar screws. Transsyndesmotic SBs did not provide any additional stability and tended to translate the fibula medially.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Posterior malleolar fixation with AITFL augmentation using ST may be the preferred surgical method when treating patients with acute ankle injury involving an unstable syndesmosis and a PMF ≥25%.

Comparison of a Novel Modified All-Suture Construct versus Suspensory Suture-button Fixation in a Syndesmotic Injury Model

OBJECTIVES

To biomechanically investigate a novel modified all-suture construct compared with commercially available suspensory button fixation for stabilization of the syndesmosis.

METHODS

Eight matched pairs of cadaver lower limbs were obtained. We used a material testing machine and Optotrak optoelectronic 3D motion measurement system for testing. Syndesmotic injuries were simulated, and specimens were fixed with either a suspensory suture button or modified all-suture construct. Repaired specimens were then cyclically loaded for 500 cycles. Spatial relationship of the tibia and fibula were continuously monitored for the intact, destabilized, and repaired states. The results were analyzed using independent samples t test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in sagittal or coronal plane translation between intact and either repair. Compared with the intact state, both repair techniques demonstrated significantly more external rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia and decreased construct stiffness. Cycling of the specimens did not significantly increase coronal or sagittal plane translation; however, external rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia increased and stiffness decreased with cycling for both repair techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that sagittal and coronal plane translation is no different from the intact state for both fixation techniques. However, rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia was increased, and construct stiffness was decreased compared with the intact state for both fixation techniques. These findings suggest that an all-suture construct could offer syndesmotic fixation comparable with proprietary suspensory button fixation in a cadaver model.

Comparison of Suture Button and Syndesmotic Screw for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

The syndesmotic screw (SS) and suture button (SB) fixation methods are both widely used for the reduction of ankle syndesmotic injury, with varying outcomes.

Purpose

To review recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the outcomes between SS and SB fixation for ankle syndesmotic injury.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant RCTs published between 1966 and 2021 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing SS and SB fixation for ankle syndesmotic injury. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Primary outcomes included complications, malreduction, and unplanned reoperation, and secondary outcomes were the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS), and EuroQol-5 Domain (EQ-5D) score. The mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Random- or fixed-effects model was applied according to heterogeneity.

Results

Of 389 studies, 8 RCTs involving 512 patients were included. Overall, 257 patients received SS fixation and 255 patients received SB fixation. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in malreduction (RR, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.07) or EQ-5D (MD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03). However, the SB group showed significant advantages over the SS group in complications (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.66), unplanned reoperation (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.89), AOFAS score (MD, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.77 to 4.31), and OMAS (MD, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.54 to 7.48). The risk of bias of the included studies was acceptable.

Conclusion

The results showed that there were no significant differences between the SS and SB groups in malreduction and EQ-5D scores. However, the SB group had significantly better local irritation rates, unplanned reoperation rates, AOFAS scores, and OMASs.

Value of Intraoperative 3D Imaging on the Quality of Reduction of the Distal Tibiofibular Joint When Using a Suture-Button System

BACKGROUND

The quality of reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint (DTFJ) has a major impact on the outcome. Novel suture-button systems as well as intraoperative 3D imaging can be applied to increase the quality of DTFJ reduction intraoperatively. The individual effect of either remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of intraoperative 3D imaging on the quality of reduction of the DTFJ when using a suture-button system.

METHODS

Retrospective, radiographic study including adult patients who underwent surgical stabilization of the syndesmosis with a suture-button system for acute, unilateral, unstable syndesmotic injuries with postoperative bilateral CT imaging. The use of an intraoperative 3D scan was the individual surgeon's choice. Assessed was whether the intraoperative 3D imaging had an influence on the postoperative quality of DTFJ reduction and revision rates. These findings were put in perspective to the correction potential of the suture-button system.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were included; 76 of these received an intraoperative 3D imaging. Neither the rate of formal malreduction (17% vs 17%) nor the postoperative revision rate (4% vs 3%) differed significantly between patients with or without intraoperative 3D imaging. Intraoperative 3D imaging revealed a false-negative rate of 14%. The intrinsic correction potential of the suture-button system reduced the number of formally malreduced DTFJs in both groups by 51%.

CONCLUSION

The additional value of intraoperative 3D imaging to assess the quality of DTFJ reduction in our series did not improve syndesmotic reduction when using a flexible suture-button system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative cohort study.

Presurgical Perspective and Postsurgical Evaluation of Instability and Microinstability Secondary to Ankle Ligaments Injury

Injuries of the ankle ligaments complexes are very common, and ∼ 20 to 40% of patients can develop chronic ankle instability (CAI). Current concepts in CAI allow a better understanding of the ankle biomechanics needed to repair it. The surgical treatment of CAI has evolved in the last decade, and ankle arthroscopy has become an essential tool in the treatment of instability with promising results. We review the different surgical techniques to treat CAI, both those frequently used and the new approaches, as well as the normal postsurgical appearance of ankle ligaments repair and the most common complications.

Compensation of Dynamic Fixation Systems in the Quality of Reduction of Distal Tibiofibular Joint in Acute Syndesmotic Complex Injuries: A CT-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing discussion on how to best stabilize syndesmotic injuries. Previous studies have indicated a better quality of reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint (DTFJ) for the suture button systems compared to syndesmotic screw fixation. Still, the reason for this superiority remains unclear. The aims of this retrospective study were to (1) analyze the deviation of the tibial and fibular drilling tunnels of the suture button system and (2) to compare these to the quality of reduction of the DTFJ assessed on bilateral postoperative CT images.

METHODS

Included were all adult patients who underwent syndesmotic stabilization for an acute injury using a suture button system, with postoperative, bilateral CT imaging over a 10-year period. A total of 147 patients were eligible. Based on individually reconstructed axial CT slices, the postoperative quality of reduction of the DTFJs was rated on bilateral CT images. Furthermore, the rotation and translation of the suture button drilling tunnels were analyzed. Based on these measurements, the intraoperative reduction of the DTFJ was recalculated and again rated. Using these values, the correction potential of suture button systems on the reduction of the DTFJ was analyzed.

RESULTS

(1) The drilling tunnel deviated considerably for both rotation |2.3±2.1 degrees| (range: |0.0-13.1 degrees|) and translation |0.9±0.8 mm| (range: |0-4.3 mm|). Based on the deviation of the drilling tunnels in fibula and tibia, the calculated intraoperative reduction of the DTFJ was classified as malreduced in 35.4%. (2) The DTFJ was postoperatively identified as malreduced in 17% of patients. Overall, the suture button system tended to compensate toward a more anatomical reduction both in the axial and sagittal plane.

CONCLUSION

A suture button system postoperatively deviates and apparently has the capacity to compensate for intraoperative malreduction. Analysis of the drilling tunnels revealed that the use of a rigid fixation system would have doubled the postoperative malreduction rate.

Biomechanics comparison between endobutton fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for syndesmotic injury ankle fracture; a finite element analysis and cadaveric validation study

Introduction

Various syndesmotic fixation methods in ankle injury are recommended; however, a lack of biomechanical information persists regarding the stiffness of the fixation methods. The current study thus aimed to assess biomechanical cadaveric validation and perform a finite element analysis of syndesmotic fixation comparing endobutton vs. screw after syndesmotic injury with an ankle fracture.

Method

Five pairs of ankles of fresh cadavers were used for the validity test for Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (AITFL), Posterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (PITFL), and Interosseous ligament biomechanics properties. Four finite element models (FEM) were created: an intact model, a fracture model with/without syndesmotic injury, an endobutton fixation model, and a syndesmotic screw fixation model. Each FEM was tested vis-à-vis external rotation force, anteroposterior translation force, and compression force until model failure. The primary outcomes were stiffness and force until failure.

Result

The respective anteroposterior translation force for the stiffness of the intact model, the screw fixation model, and the endobutton fixation was 8.14, 9.15, and 8.17 N/mm. The respective external rotation force for the stiffness of intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 0.927,0.949, and 0.940 Nm/degree. The respective stress under compression force in the intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 39.94,25.59, and 37.30 MPa.

Conclusion

Both screw and endobutton fixation models provided more translation, compression, and rotation stability than normal syndesmosis, but the screw model provided greater translation and compression force stability than the endobutton model. There was no difference in rotational stability between the two models. We thus recommend the same rehabilitation protocol for both fixation methods; however, vigorous translation and compression should be avoided when using endobutton fixation.

“Flexible nature of fixation” in syndesmotic stabilization of the inferior tibiofibular joint affects the radiological reduction outcome

Purpose

Fibular mobility after suture button stabilization (SBS) of inferior tibiofibular joint (syndesmosis) injuries has been described. This effect is called the “flexible nature of fixation (FNF).” In this study, we aimed to quantify FNF in syndesmotic stabilization.

Methods

Postoperative bilateral computed tomography (CT) of ankle fractures with syndesmosis stabilization by SBS or syndesmotic screw (SYS) was retrospectively analyzed. The transverse offset (TO) and vertical offset (VO) were defined by evaluating the drill channels. The reduction outcome was evaluated by the side-to-side difference between the clear space and the anterior tibiofibular distance (antTFD). The calculated anterior tibiofibular distance (cal-antTFD) was calculated by subtracting the TO from the validated antTFD. Subsequently, a reevaluation of the reduction outcomes after SYS or SBS stabilization was performed using cal-antTFD.

Results

Sixty patients (44 with SBS and 16 with SYS stabilization) were analyzed. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities for TO and VO were excellent (α > 0.92). SYS stabilization showed lower mean TO (− 0.02 mm; SD 0.14) and VO (0.11 mm; SD, 0.29 mm) than SBS stabilization (TO 1.16 mm, SD 1.4 mm; VO 0.2 mm, SD 0.8 mm; p = 0.001). The rate of malreduction according to cal-antTFD was higher than that of antFTD (p = 0.033).

Conclusion

The presented method, which evaluates the position of the tibial to the fibular drill channel, allowed the quantification of the “FNF.” The often described difference in the dynamic stabilization of SBS compared to the rigid stabilization by SYS could be objectified. Considering cal-antTFD illustrates that FNF potentially reduces the rate of malreduction in SBS stabilization.

The Australian ankle syndesmosis injury survey

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

The ankle syndesmosis is frequently disrupted in ankle injuries, with higher incidence in concomitant ankle fractures. There is debate regarding the most appropriate surgical management of these injuries, with the development of suture-button devices challenging the conventional approach of surgical stabilisation with syndesmotic screws. The primary aim of this study was to assess current practice variation at a national level, enabling a comparison with reported practice around the world. The secondary aims were to assess practice variation between operative indications and inconsistencies between surgeon device usage and personal preference should they be injured themselves.

METHODS

A 20-item survey detailing surgical experience, diagnosis, surgical management preference and a series of case studies was conducted. The survey was endorsed and promoted by the Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA).

RESULTS

125 responses were received during the three-month study period. The most commonly used method to stabilise a syndesmotic injury by Australian orthopaedic surgeons was two 3.5 mm screws (26.4%), closely followed by one suture-button (23.2%). Overall, 44% of surgeons employ a dynamic stabilisation method and 54.4% a static stabilisation method. Half of surgeons recommend routine removal of syndesmosis screws, and surgeons tend to use two devices for high Weber C fractures. One third of surgeons who most commonly use screws in their practice would actually prefer a suture-button for management of their own syndesmosis injury.

CONCLUSION

Significant variability remains in the management of syndesmosis injuries. This survey of Australian orthopaedic surgeons reveals higher suture-button device use when compared to other countries.

A Novel Adjustable EndoButton Fixation Assisted by 3D Printing Technology for Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Biomechanical Study

Purpose: The recommendations for surgical fixation of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries are increasingly challenging for many clinical orthopedists, as international consensus has not been published for the optimal treatment of the injury. Thus, we have created a 3D-printed navigation template for a precise bone tunnel and a novel adjustable EndoButton fixation (NAE) for the ideal treatment. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of the 3D-printed navigation template and explore the biomechanical performance of the NAE technique by comparing it with the intact syndesmosis, screw technique, and TightRope (TR) technique.

Methods: Twenty-four human cadaveric legs were randomly allocated to four groups: the NAE group (n = 6), TR group (n = 6), screw group (n = 6), and intact group (n = 6). A personalized navigation template based on computed tomography scans was designed, and 3D printing models were generated for the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The NAE, TR, and screw group were performed via 3D-printed navigation template, respectively. All groups were tested under increasing loading forces including axial loading (from 100 N to 700 N) and torsional loading (from 1 N to 5 N), which were performed in different ankle positions. The displacements of the tibiofibular syndesmosis were analyzed using the Bose Electroforce 3510-AT biomechanical testing equipment.

Results: Surgical fixations were conducted successfully through a 3D-printed navigation template. Both in axial or torsional loading experiments, no statistically significant difference was observed in the displacements among the NAE, TR, and intact groups in most situations (p &gt; 0.05), whereas the screw group demonstrated obviously smaller displacements than the abovementioned three groups (p &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion: The 3D printing technology application may become beneficial and favorable for locating and making the bone tunnel. Also, the NAE fixation provides the performance of complete ligaments; it also restores physiologic micromotion and avoids insufficient or excessive reduction when compared to the TR and screw technique. This may offer a new fixation for the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries that is desirable for clinical promotion.

Syndesmosis screw breakage: An analysis of multiple breakage locations

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

Concerns have been raised about screw breakage within the tibia or fibula, referred to as intraosseous breakage. The purpose of this investigation is to analyze the technical aspects of syndesmotic screw placement in multiple anatomic breakage locations.

MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis of over 1056 patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation was completed. Demographics, screw length, width, number, height above the tibial plafond, angle, breakage location, and breakage location on the screw were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Intraosseous (IO) screw breakage (91 screws, 68 patients) was more common than clear space (CS) breakage (28 screws, 18 patients) (P = < 0.001). Within the IO group, screw breakage within the tibia (60 screws, 52 patients) was more common compared to fibula breakage (29 screws, 24 patients) (P = < 0.001).Increased BMI and the use of multiple screws were associated with IO breakage (P = .007) and CS breakage (P = .012), respectively. Increased screw angle and age were associated with fibular IO breakage (P = .021, P = .036) when compared to other IO breakage locations. Screw angle and placement showed no significant differences between compared groups (P = .629, P = .570).

CONCLUSION

Syndesmosis screw breakage, overall, occurred more commonly in an IO location. When compared to IO breakage, the use of multiple syndesmosis screws is most associated with CS breakage. Increased BMI is associated with increased IO breakage when compared to CS breakage. Patients with IO screw breakage within the fibula had increased age and placed at a higher angle when compared to other IO breakage locations. No other factors related to screw placement, including the height of placement, were found to be significantly associated with location of screw breakage.

Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries

Background: Surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries is not trivial, and there are no generally accepted treatment guidelines. The most common controversies regarding surgical treatment are related to screw fixation versus dynamic fixation, the use of reduction clamps, open versus closed reduction, and the role of the posterior malleolus and of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). Our aim was to draw important conclusions from the pertinent literature concerning surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries, to transform these conclusions into surgical principles supported by the literature, and finally to fuse these principles into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists of systematic reviews of relevant studies dealing with the surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries were searched independently by two reviewers using specific terms and limits. Surgical principles supported by the literature were fused into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Results: A total of 171 articles were included for further considerations. Among them, 47 articles concerned syndesmotic screw fixation and 41 flexible dynamic fixations of the syndesmosis. Twenty-five studies compared screw fixation with dynamic fixations, and seven out of these comparisons were randomized controlled trials. Nineteen articles addressed the posterior malleolus, 14 the role of the AITFL, and eight the use of reduction clamps. Anatomic reduction is crucial to prevent posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, flexible dynamic stabilization techniques should be preferred whenever possible. An unstable AITFL should be repaired and augmented, as it represents an important stabilizer of external rotation of the distal fibula. Conclusions: The current literature provides sufficient arguments for the development of an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm for unstable syndesmotic injuries.

Anatomical reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament in elite athletes using InternalBrace suture tape

AIMS

The ideal management of acute syndesmotic injuries in elite athletes is controversial. Among several treatment methods used to stabilize the syndesmosis and facilitate healing of the ligaments, the use of suture tape (InternalBrace) has previously been described. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional outcome, including American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, knee-to-wall measurements, and the time to return to play in days, of unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with the use of the InternalBrace in elite athletes.

METHODS

Data on a consecutive group of elite athletes who underwent isolated reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament using the InternalBrace were collected prospectively. Our patient group consisted of 19 elite male athletes with a mean age of 24.5 years (17 to 52). Isolated injuries were seen in 12 patients while associated injuries were found in seven patients (fibular fracture, medial malleolus fracture, anterior talofibular ligament rupture, and posterior malleolus fracture). All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 17 months (mean 27 months (17 to 35)).

RESULTS

All patients returned to their pre-injury level of sports activities. One patient developed a delayed union of the medial malleolus. The mean return to play was 62 days (49 to 84) for isolated injuries, while the patients with concomitant injuries returned to play in a mean of 104 days (56 to 196). The AOFAS score returned to 100 postoperatively in all patients. Knee-to-wall measurements were the same as the contralateral side in 18 patients, while one patient lacked 2 cm compared to the contralateral side.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the use of the InternalBrace in the management of unstable syndesmotic injuries offers an alternative method of stabilization, with good short-term results, including early return to sports in elite athletes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):68-75.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Syndesmotic Unstable Injuries: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Headed

Up to 10% of ankle sprains are considered "high ankle" sprains with associated syndesmotic injury. Initial diagnosis of syndesmotic injury is based on physical examination, but further evaluation of the distal tibiofibular joint in the sagittal, coronal, and rotational planes is necessary to determine instability. Imaging modalities including weight-bearing CT and ultrasonography allow a physiologic and dynamic assessment of the syndesmosis. These modalities in turn provide the clinician useful information in two and three dimensions to identify and consequently treat syndesmotic instability, especially when subtle. Because there is notable variability in the shape of the incisura between individuals, contralateral comparison with the uninjured ankle as an optimal internal control is advised. Once syndesmotic instability is identified, surgical treatment is recommended. Several fixation methods have been described, but the foremost aspect is to achieve an anatomic reduction. Identifying any associated injuries and characteristics of the syndesmotic instability will lead to the appropriate treatment that restores the anatomy and stability of the distal tibiofibular joint.

Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements

BACKGROUND

Inadequate reduction of syndesmotic injuries can result in disabling clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare syndesmosis congruity after fixation by syndesmotic screws (SYS) or a suture button system (SBS) using three-dimensional (3D) computed imaging techniques.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, patients with unilateral stabilization of an ankle fracture with a syndesmotic injury and post-operative bilateral CT scans were analyzed using a recently established 3D method. The side-to-side differences were compared for tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS), translation angle (∆α), and vertical offset (∆z) among patients stabilized with syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Syndesmotic malreduction was defined for ∆CS > 2 mm and for |∆α| > 5°. ∆CS and ∆α were correlated with two-dimensional (2D) measurements.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients stabilized with a syndesmosis screw and 29 stabilized with a suture button system were analyzed. After stabilization, both groups revealed mild diastasis (SYS: mean ∆CS 0.3 mm, SD 1.1 mm vs SBS: mean ∆CS 0.2 mm, SD 1.2 mm, p = 0.710). In addition, both stabilization methods showed slight dorsalization of the fibula (SYS: mean ∆α 0.5°, SD 4.6° vs SBS: mean ∆α 2.1°, SD 3.7°, p = 0.192). Also, restoration of the fibula-to-tibia length ratio also did not differ between the two groups (SYS: mean Δz of 0.5 mm, SD 2.4 mm vs SBS: mean Δz of 0 mm, SD 1.2 mm; p = 0.477). Malreduction according to high ∆α was most common (26% of cases), with equal distribution between the groups (p = 0.234). ∆CS and ∆α showed good correlation with 2D measurements (ρ = 0.567; ρ = 0.671).

CONCLUSION

This in vivo analysis of post-operative 3D models showed no differences in immediate post-operative alignment after syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Special attention should be paid to syndesmotic malreduction in the sagittal orientation of the fibula in relation to the tibia in radiological control of the syndesmotic congruity as well as intra-operatively.

Static versus dynamic fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

PURPOSE

Multiple Level I meta-analyses were conducted comparing traditional static vs. more recently introduced dynamic strategies of fixation for injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (TFS). The aim of this review was to assess their robustness and methodological quality, providing support in the choice of a treatment strategy in case of TFS injury using the highest level of evidence.

METHODS

In this systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, meta-analyses/systematic reviews comparing static and dynamic fixation methods after acute TFS injury were identified. The robustness of studies was evaluated using the fragility index (FI) for meta-analysis and the fragility quotient (FQ). The risk of bias was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Finally, the Jadad was applied to select the study which provided the highest quality of evidence to develop recommendations for the fixation strategy of these lesions.

RESULTS

Out of 1.302 records, four Level I meta-analyses were included in this study. Analyzing the statistically significant dichotomous outcomes, the median FI was 3.5 (IQR, 2 to 5.5; range, 1 to 9), while the median FQ was 1.9% (IQR, 1 to 3.5; range 0.35 to 4.4). In total, 37% had an FI of 2 or less and 75% of outcomes had a FI of 4 or less. According to the AMSTAR score and Jadad algorithm, the largest meta-analysis was selected as the highest evidence provided so far.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analyses with statistically significant dichotomous outcomes comparing dynamic and static fixation for treating injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are fragile, with a change in less than four patients or less than 2% of the study population sufficient to reverse a significant outcome to nonsignificant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Suture button versus syndesmosis screw fixation in pronation-external rotation ankle fractures: A minimum 6-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) with short-term follow-ups have shown that, in treatment of syndesmosis injuries, a suture button device (SB) resulted in better radiographic and functional outcome compared to syndesmosis screw fixation (SS). However, only one RCT has reported long-term results; thus, the syndesmosis malreduction rates for both implants might increase during longer follow-up. The primary objective of this RCT was to evaluate the maintenance of syndesmosis reduction with the SS compared to the SB fixation in patients during a minimum follow-up of 6-years. The secondary objectives were to assess the post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) grade and the functional outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At Oulu University Hospital, between January 2010 and December 2011, we enrolled 43 patients with Lauge-Hansen pronation-external rotation type 4/Weber C, ankle fractures with unstable syndesmosis. Patients were randomised to treatment with either a single 3.5-mm tricortical SS (22 patients) or an SB (21 patients). The mean follow-up was 7.1 years (range, 6.2-7.9). Syndesmosis reduction and OA grade was assessed with standing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of both ankles. Malreduction was defined as >2 mm side-to-side difference in the mean width of the syndesmosis. OA was graded according to the Morrey & Wiedeman classification. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Outcome Score (OMAS) and a quality of life questionnaire (RAND 36-Item Health Survey) were used to evaluate functional outcome.

RESULTS

Two syndesmoses in the SS group and one in the SB group were malreduced (P = 0.58). Moderate OA after a mean of 7 years post-injury was common. In the SS and SB groups, 9 of 16 and 11 of 13 patients, respectively, had one or more grades serious OA in the injured ankle than in the uninjured ankle (P = 0.11). The mean OMAS was 88 in the SS group and 78 in the SB group (difference between means 7.1, 95% CI: -7.0-21.1, P = 0.32). The RAND-36 results did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

The SS and SB maintained syndesmosis reduction equally well during follow-up. Our study findings also suggest that both methods result in moderate OA rates and the functional outcome is comparable between these two syndesmosis fixation methods.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Suture Button Technique and Screw Fixation Technique in Patients With Acute Syndesmotic Diastasis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background:

Our aim was to compare the outcome between suture button (SB) stabilization and syndesmotic screw fixation (SF) in patients with acute syndesmotic diastasis.

Methods:

A systematic literature search up to June 30, 2021, was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of SB with SF techniques in patients with acute syndesmotic diastasis. We calculated mean differences for continuous outcomes, using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method, and odds ratio for dichotomous outcomes, using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results:

Eight RCTs involving 569 patients met the inclusion criteria, 1 RCT with level I evidence, and 7 RCTs with level II evidence. The meta-analysis showed that the SB technique had a higher AOFAS score <6 months and 12 months postoperatively (MD = 4.74, 95% CI 1.68-7.80, P = .01; and MD = 5.42, 95% CI 1.50-9.33, P = .02) and reduced the risk of implant irritation (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.89, P = .03), implant failure (OR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.23, P < .01), and reoperation (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.83, P = .01). The 2 approaches did not differ in further functional outcomes or postoperative complications.

Conclusion:

Because functional outcomes showed no relevant difference between both SB and SF, the advantage of SB appears to be in the lower risk for postoperative complications. The SB technique led to fewer cases of implant irritation, implant failure, and reoperation compared with SF.

Level of Evidence:

Level I, meta-analysis of RCTs.

Syndesmotic Stabilization: Syndesmotic Screw Versus Flexible Fixation: A Systematic Review

Syndesmotic injuries are common injuries that occur in isolation or associated with ankle fractures. The suture button device fixation (SBDF) has become increasingly attractive to orthopedic surgeons as an alternative to metallic screw fixation (MSF) for syndesmotic fixation. This review involved the highest-quality clinical biomechanical and cost analysis studies to provide a comprehensive review. A literature search in the electronic databases was conducted to identify clinical, biomechanical as well as cost analysis studies in which the MSF was compared to SBDF from 1990 to 2018. Only comparative clinical studies with a level of evidence I or II were included besides any comparative biomechanical or cost analysis study. The (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Eight clinical, 11 biomechanical, and 3 cost analysis studies were included. The clinical studies consisted of 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 cohort studies. The average American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score for the SBDF group was (92.4) compared to (86.6) for the MSF group at 1 year follow-up. SBDF group showed a lower rate of malreduction, implant removal, implant failure, and complications. The biomechanical studies showed better reduction accuracy in the SBDF group. The reduction maintenance was comparable in the coronal plane but not in the sagittal plane. The cost-effectiveness of the SBDF was highly dependent on the difference in implant removal rate. In conclusion, the SBDF showed comparable to better outcomes compared to the MSF. It may be a better option for syndesmotic fixation.

The Impact of Suture Button Removal in Syndesmosis Fixation

The suture button (SB) device was introduced to negate the need for routine hardware removal in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries. However, a considerable SB removal rate has been reported, and the impact of removal is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes after removal of SB for syndesmosis fixation. A total of 36 patients who underwent removal surgery after syndesmosis fixation using SB were identified. The mean postoperative time to removal was 12.2 months. On a plain radiograph, tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) was measured and compared at three follow-up time points. In patients with computed tomography (CT) imaging (n = 18), the anterior-to-posterior (A/P) ratio was measured to evaluate changes in quality of reduction. Additionally, clinical outcomes were assessed. There were no significant differences in TFCS between the three follow-up periods. None of the patients exhibited recurrent diastasis after SB removal. Although CT analysis demonstrated malreduction in six patients (33.3%), five of six patients had a subsequent spontaneous reduction of the syndesmosis. Clinically, all patients described the resolution of symptoms related to painful hardware at the final follow-up. Our results demonstrate that SB removal at one year following syndesmosis fixation leads to improved clinical symptoms without negatively impacting the quality of syndesmosis reduction.

No difference in 90-day complication rate following open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedure

The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day complication rate between the open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. A retrospective review of patients who underwent an open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure at NYU Langone Health between 2012 and 2019 was performed. The complications, readmissions, and reoperations within 90 days were assessed. Outcomes were compared between the two approaches, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The study included 150 patients (open: 110; arthroscopic: 40), with no patients lost to follow-up within the first 90 days. Both cohorts were similar in terms of patient demographics. No intra-operative complications were observed in either group. Overall, there were 4 post-operative complications with the open approach and 2 with the arthroscopic approach (3.6% and 5.0%, respectively; n.s.) during the study period. Three patients required a readmission within the 90-day period; one patient in both groups required a revision Latarjet for graft fracture, and one patient in the open Latarjet required irrigation and debridement for deep infection (n.s.). With the open approach, there were 2 (2.3%) wound complications, 1 graft complication, and 1 (1.1%) nerve injury. With the arthroscopic approach, there was 1 (2.8%) wound complication and 1 (2.8%) hardware complication. The safety, and 90-day complication and readmission profile of arthroscopic Latarjet is similar to open Latarjet procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Comparison of Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw in the Treatment of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Meta-analysis

Traditionally screw fixation is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of unstable syndesmosis injuries. However, it is still a controversy whether suture-button (SB) device can achieve better clinical outcomes and decrease the risk of complications compared with syndesmotic screw (SS). The present meta-analysis was conducted to figure out whether SB fixation was superior to traditionally screw fixation. Twelve clinical studies were identified, involving 320 patients in the SB group and 334 patients in the SS group. Among patients treated with SB, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was significantly higher at 3-month follow-up (p = .01) and 2-year follow-up (p = .02), and the Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) score at 1-year follow-up (p = .002). In addition, the SB group had significantly better results in the malreduction (p = .0008), implant failure (p < .01), implant removal (p < .01), and local irritation (p = .004). No statistical differences were found in the AOFAS at 6 months follow-up (p = .33) and 1-year follow-up (p = .33), OMA at 3 months follow-up (p = .09), 6 months follow-up (p = .14) and 2 years follow-up (p = .36), the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (p = .73), Euro Qol 5-dimension questionnaire (p = .33), dorsiflexion (DF; p = .91), plantarflexion (p = .23), medial clear space (p = .42), tibiofibular clear space (p = .60), tibiofibular overlap (p = .84), and other complications (p = .95). Based on this meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in postoperative radiological measurements, and no sufficient evidence was found to support the improved clinical outcomes compared with SS fixation group. However, SB technique could improve functional outcomes, reduce the rate of implant removal, implant failure, local irritation, and malreduction without increasing risk of other complications. Therefore, the SB technique should be recommended in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries.

Screw versus suture button in treatment of syndesmosis instability: Comparison using weightbearing CT scan

BACKGROUND

The superiority of screw or suture button fixation for syndesmotic instability remains debatable. Our aim is to compare radiographic outcomes of screw and suture button fixation of syndesmotic instability using weight bearing CT scan (WBCT).

METHODS

Twenty patients with fixation of unilateral syndesmotic instability were recruited and divided among two groups (screw = 10, suture button = 10). All patients had WBCT of both ankles ≥12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

In suture button group, injured side measurements were significantly different from normal side for syndesmotic area (P = 0.003), fibular rotation (P = 0.004), anterior difference (P = 0.025) and direct anterior difference (P = 0.035). In screw group, syndesmotic area was the only significantly different measurement (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

While both screw and suture button didn't completely restore the syndesmotic area as compared to the contralateral uninjured ankle, external malrotation of the fibula was uniquely associated with suture button fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Indications and Surgical Treatment of Acute and Chronic Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injuries with and Without Associated Fractures

Syndesmosis injury may occur in a wide variety of clinical scenarios. Accurate diagnosis and anatomic reconstruction are necessary for optimizing clinical outcomes. The management considerations of syndesmotic injuries with associated proximal fibula fractures are reviewed. Methods to improve the accuracy of syndesmotic reduction are outlined. The management of fractures of the posterior malleolus, Chaput tubercle, and Wagstaffe tubercle is discussed with an emphasis on their contributions to syndesmotic stability. The evolving role of flexible fixation for syndesmosis injuries is discussed. Causes and strategies for dealing with loss of reduction and malreduced syndesmotic injuries are presented.

Unstable malleolar ankle fractures: evaluation of prognostic factors and sports return

INTRODUCTION

Ankle malleolar fractures are one of the most common surgical fractures. The literature about ankle fracture sport related is reduced. Severe fractures, fractures-dislocations, syndesmosis lesions, associated osteochondral lesions, postoperative complications, as well as age are associated in several studies with worse functional results and may, therefore, also be associated with a lower rate of sports return. This study aims to retrospectively assess the return to physical activity at the level prior to injury in individuals undergoing surgical treatment of unstable malleolar ankle injuries and to identify risk factors associated with a non-return.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated between January 2008 and December 2017, patients with an unstable malleolar fracture of the ankle surgically treated, recreational or competitive sportsman with a minimum follow-up of one year. Demographic data, fracture classification according to AO classification, presence/absence of osteochondral lesion, presence/absence of unstable syndesmosis lesion, associated dislocation, type of surgery, postoperative complications, functional outcome evaluation with the AOFAS score and sports return.

RESULTS

92 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean AOFAS score observed was 90.93 (67-100). 69.7% of patients returned without limitations in performing physical activity. 21.75% returned with limitations and 8.7% did not return to physical activity. No association was observed between age, sex, syndesmosis lesion and greater risk of not returning to physical activity. Patients with bimalleolar or trimalleolar fractures, osteochondral injury, or associated dislocation presented an increased risk of inferior functional score and non-return sporting activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures, associated presence of dislocation and osteochondral lesions are associated with worse clinical outcome and lower return onset.

Optimizing Return to Play for Common and Controversial Foot and Ankle Sports Injuries

»

Surgical decision-making should consider factors to help optimize return to play for athletes with foot and ankle injuries, including injuries to the syndesmosis, the Achilles tendon, the fifth metatarsal, and the Lisfranc complex. Understanding influential factors on return to play may help orthopaedic surgeons counsel athletes and coaches on expectations for a timeline to return to play and performance metrics.

»

Outcomes after rigid and flexible fixation for syndesmotic injuries are generally favorable. Some data support an earlier return to sport and higher functional scores with flexible fixation, in addition to lower rates of reoperation and a decreased incidence of malreduction, particularly with deltoid repair, if indicated.

»

Minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon repair have been shown to have a decreased risk of wound complications. Athletes undergoing Achilles repair should expect to miss a full season of play to recover.

»

Athletes with fifth metatarsal fractures have better return-to-play outcomes with surgical management and can expect a high return-to-play rate within approximately 3 months of surgery.

»

Percutaneous treatment of Lisfranc injuries may expedite return to play relative to open procedures.

Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years

Background and purpose - Better outcomes are reported for suture button (SB) compared with syndesmotic screws (SS) in patients treated for an acute ankle syndesmotic injury. One reason could be that screws are more rigid than an SB. A single tricortical 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw (TS) is the most dynamic screw option. Our hypothesis is that 1 SB and 1 TS provide similar results. Therefore, in randomized controlled trial, we compared the results between SB and TS for syndesmotic stabilization in patients with acute syndesmosis injury. Patients and methods - 113 patients with acute syndesmotic injury were randomized to SB (n = 55) or TS (n = 58). The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Olerud-Molander Ankle score (OMA), visual analogue scale (VAS), EuroQol- 5D (EQ-5D), radiologic results, range of motion, complications, and reoperations (no implants were routinely removed). CT scans of both ankles were obtained after surgery, and after 1 and 2 years. Results - The 2-year follow-up rate was 84%. At 2 years, median AOFAS score was 97 in both groups (IQR SB 87-100, IQR TS 90-100, p = 0.7), median MOXFQ index was 5 in the SB group and 3 in the TS group (IQR 0-18 vs. 0-8, p = 0.2), and median OMA score was 90 in the SB group and 100 in the TS group (IQR 75-100 vs. 83-100, p = 0.2). The syndesmotic reduction was similar 2 years after surgery; 19/55 patients in the SB group and 13/58 in the TS group had a difference in anterior syndesmotic width ≥ 2 mm (p = 0.3). 0 patients in the SB group and 5 patients in the TS group had complete tibiofibular synostosis (p = 0.03). At 2 years, 10 TS were broken. Complications and reoperations were similar between the groups. Interpretation - We found no clinically relevant differences regarding outcome scores between the groups. TS is an inexpensive alternative to SB.

Anterior Syndesmotic Augmentation Technique Using Nonabsorbable Suture-Tape for Acute and Chronic Syndesmotic Instability

Syndesmotic instability is a source of significant pain and disability. Both subtle instability and gross diastasis, whether acute or chronic, require stabilization and may benefit from reconstruction with ligamentous augmentation. The use of nonabsorbable suture-tape has emerged as a promising operative strategy, allowing surgeons to anatomically reconstruct the syndesmosis, in particular the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament. The current work provides a detailed description of the technique and preliminary results of a patient cohort treated using nonabsorbable suture-tape for syndesmotic augmentation.Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

Syndesmotic Fixation Utilizing a Novel Screw: A Retrospective Case Series Reporting Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Background. Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 20% of ankle fractures and requires anatomical reduction and stabilization to maximize outcomes. Although screw breakage is often asymptomatic, the breakage location can be unpredictable and result in painful bony erosion. The purpose of this investigation is to report early clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent syndesmotic fixation using a novel metal screw designed with a controlled break point. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent syndesmotic fixation utilizing the R3lease Tissue Stabilization System (Paragon 28, Denver, CO) over a 12-month period. Demographic and screw-specific data were obtained. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed, and radiographic parameters were measured. Screw loosening or breakage was documented. Results. 18 patients (24 screws) met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 11.7 months (range = 6.0-14.7 months). 5/24 screws (21%) fractured at the break point. No screw fractured at another location, nor did any fracture prior to resumption of weight bearing; 19 screws did not fracture, with 8/19 intact screws (42.1%) demonstrating loosening. There was no evidence of syndesmotic diastasis or mortise malalignment on final follow-up. No screws required removal during the study period. Conclusion. This study provides the first clinical data on a novel screw introduced specifically for syndesmotic fixation. At short-term follow up, there were no complications and the R3lease screw provided adequate fixation to allow healing and prevent diastasis. Although initial results are favorable, longer-term follow-up with data on cost comparisons and rates of hardware removal are needed to determine cost-effectiveness relative to similar implants.Level of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series.