Radical surgery and venetoclax + azacitidine in an octogenarian with acute myeloid leukemia

Not available.

Risk factors for revision surgery in operative treatment of traumatic injuries of the olecranon and prepatellar bursa

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic lacerations of the prepatellar (PB) and olecranon bursa (OB) are common injuries. The aim of this study was to gain descriptive data and to identify risk factors associated with complications that made revision surgery after primary bursectomy necessary.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric study at a level I trauma center, all patients with traumatic lacerations of the PB or OB who were treated with primary surgical bursectomy from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed.

RESULTS

150 consecutive patients were included. In 44% of cases, the PB was affected (n = 66), in 56% the OB (n = 84). The reoperation rate after surgical bursectomy was 10.7% (n = 16). The main cause of reoperation was wound infection (50%; n = 8). The most common pathogen of postoperative infections was Staphylococcus aureus (87.5%). Several comorbidities have been identified as risk factors for reoperation after primary surgical bursectomy, such as heart diseases, arterial hypertension, the use of antihypertensives and anticoagulation. In contrast, surgical expertise, use of drains, postoperative immobilization, and postoperative antibiotics had no statistically significant effect. A significantly higher postoperative infection rate (17.6%) was observed in patients who were operated more than 48 h after initial trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limited recommendations for therapy of these common injuries, further investigations should focus on standardized therapeutic options for lacerations of the PB or OB. Delayed surgical interventions after trauma were associated with higher complication rates. Therefore, urgent surgery within 48 h after trauma may help to prevent revisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level of evidence IV.

Does the orientation of syndesmosis fixative device affect the immediate reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint?

INTRODUCTION

Incongruent stabilization of the distal tibiofibular joint (syndesmosis) results in poorer long-term outcome in malleolar fractures. The aim was to analyze whether the orientation of the syndesmotic stabilization would affect the immediate reduction imaged in computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The syndesmotic congruity in 114 ankle fractures with stabilization of the syndesmosis were retrospectively analyzed in the post-operative bilateral CT scans. The incisura device angle (IDA) was defined and correlated with the side-to-side difference of Leporjärvi clear-space (ΔLCS), anterior tibiofibular distance (ΔantTFD) and Nault talar dome angle (ΔNTDA) regardless of the stabilization technique and separately for suture button system and syndesmotic screw. Asymmetric reduction was defined as ΔLCS > 2 mm and |ΔantTFD|> 2 mm.

RESULTS

Regardless of the stabilization technique, no correlation between the IDA and the ΔLCS (r = 0.069), the ΔantTFD (r = 0.019) nor the ΔNTDA (r = 0.177) could be observed. There were no differences between suture button system and syndesmotic screw. Asymmetrical reduction was detected in 46% of the cases, while sagittal asymmetry was most common. No association was found between the orientation of stabilization device and occurrence of asymmetrical reduction (p > 0.05). The results of suture button system and syndesmotic screw were comparable in this respect (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Poor correlation between the orientation of the stabilization device and the immediate post-operative congruity of the syndesmosis could be shown. In contrast to current literature, this study did not show difference of suture button system over syndesmotic screw in this regard. Careful adjustment of the fibula in anteroposterior orientation should be given special attention.

Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements

BACKGROUND

Inadequate reduction of syndesmotic injuries can result in disabling clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare syndesmosis congruity after fixation by syndesmotic screws (SYS) or a suture button system (SBS) using three-dimensional (3D) computed imaging techniques.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, patients with unilateral stabilization of an ankle fracture with a syndesmotic injury and post-operative bilateral CT scans were analyzed using a recently established 3D method. The side-to-side differences were compared for tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS), translation angle (∆α), and vertical offset (∆z) among patients stabilized with syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Syndesmotic malreduction was defined for ∆CS > 2 mm and for |∆α| > 5°. ∆CS and ∆α were correlated with two-dimensional (2D) measurements.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients stabilized with a syndesmosis screw and 29 stabilized with a suture button system were analyzed. After stabilization, both groups revealed mild diastasis (SYS: mean ∆CS 0.3 mm, SD 1.1 mm vs SBS: mean ∆CS 0.2 mm, SD 1.2 mm, p = 0.710). In addition, both stabilization methods showed slight dorsalization of the fibula (SYS: mean ∆α 0.5°, SD 4.6° vs SBS: mean ∆α 2.1°, SD 3.7°, p = 0.192). Also, restoration of the fibula-to-tibia length ratio also did not differ between the two groups (SYS: mean Δz of 0.5 mm, SD 2.4 mm vs SBS: mean Δz of 0 mm, SD 1.2 mm; p = 0.477). Malreduction according to high ∆α was most common (26% of cases), with equal distribution between the groups (p = 0.234). ∆CS and ∆α showed good correlation with 2D measurements (ρ = 0.567; ρ = 0.671).

CONCLUSION

This in vivo analysis of post-operative 3D models showed no differences in immediate post-operative alignment after syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Special attention should be paid to syndesmotic malreduction in the sagittal orientation of the fibula in relation to the tibia in radiological control of the syndesmotic congruity as well as intra-operatively.

A standardized approach for exact CT-based three-dimensional position analysis in the distal tibiofibular joint

Background

Assessment of tibiofibular reduction presents an intra- and postoperative challenge. Numerous two-dimensional measurement methods have been described, most of them highly dependent on leg orientation and rater. Aim of the present work was to develop a standardized and orientation-independent 3D based method for the assessment of syndesmotic joint position.

Methods

In a retrospective single center study, 3D models of bilateral ankle joints, either after unilateral syndesmosis stabilization (operative group) or with no injury (native group) were superimposed (best fit matching) and aligned uniformly. Based on center of gravity calculations three orientation- and rater-independent parameters were determined: tibiofibular clears space (CS), vertical offset between both fibulae, and translation angle of the fibulae about tibia axis.

Results

Bilateral CT datasets of 57 native and 47 postoperative patients were analyzed. In the native group mean CS was 2.7 (SD, 0.8; range, 0.7–4.9) mm, mean CS side difference was 0.62 (SD, 0.45) mm and mean translation angle was 1.6 (SD, 1.4) degrees regarding absolute values. The operative group was found to show a significantly higher CS side difference of 0.88 (SD, 0.75) mm compared to native group (P = .046). Compared to the healthy contralateral side, operated fibulae showed mean proximal displacement of 0.56 (SD, 1.67) mm (P = .025), dorsal displacement of 1.5 (SD 4.1) degrees (P = .017).

Conclusion

By using 3D best fit matching, orientation- and rater-dependent errors can be minimized. Large interindividual and small intraindividual differences of uninjured couples support previous recommendations for bilateral imaging.

Trial registration: AZ 131/18-ek; AZ 361/19-ek

Level of evidence

Level III.

The AO triangular external fixator: a backup option in the treatment of ankle fractures in geriatric patients?

Purpose

To analyze the indications, radiological short-term outcomes, and complications of ankle fractures in geriatric patients treated with a triangular external fixator (AEF) until fracture healing. Furthermore, the effect of an additional osteosynthesis to AEF on the radiological outcome was investigated.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of ankle fractures treated in a Level I Trauma Center between 2005 and 2015 with an AEF in patients aged ≥ 65 years until fracture has healed. The combination of AEF and at least one additional osteosynthesis of a malleolus was defined as hybrid external fixator (HEF). At the time of AEF removal, a preserved ankle joint congruity was defined as good radiological outcome. Incongruity more than 2 mm was defined as poor radiologic results.

Results

16 patients (13 women, 3 men) with a mean age of 74 years (SD 6.2) were treated with AEF until fracture healing, 9 with a single AEF and 7 with a HEF. Stabilization with HEF (n = 7 [100%]) showed higher rates of good radiological outcome than AEF alone (n = 4 [44%] of 9; p = 0.034). The duration of therapy did not differ between HEF and AEF (70 day vs 77 days). 4 patients (22%) required surgical revision.

Conclusion

It could be shown that osteosynthesis in addition to AEF leads to a better radiological short-term results than using AEF alone. Therefore, in the situation where an AEF is considered as the definitive treatment option for an ankle fracture in geriatric patients with expected or existing soft tissue problems, it should be done or completed as a HEF.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic level IV.

Os calcaneus secundarius, a relevant differential diagnosis to fracture or pseudarthrosis of processus anterior of the calcaneus: a CT morphologic description

PURPOSE

A fracture or a pseudarthrosis of the processus anterior calcanei (PAC) as well as a traumatized Os calcaneus secundarius (OCS) is often overlooked. A clinical or conventional radiological differentiation of these is uncertain. Therefore, a CT scan is recommended. The aim of the study was to identify CT morphological differentiators between OCS and pathologies of PAC.

METHODS

All CT scans at our trauma center level I from 2010 to 2014, which imaged the entire foot, performed after acute trauma or postoperative control were retrospectively re-examined for OCS, other accessory ossicles (oAOS), fracture or pseudarthrosis of PAC and analyzed for specifiers.

RESULTS

In 611 CT examinations, 14 (2.3%) accessory ossicles (AOS) at the PAC were detected. 12 (86%) were identified as typical OCS and 2 (14%) as oAOS. 56 (9.2%) pathologies were detected. Of these, 44 (79%) were declared as fractures and 12 (21%) as pseudarthrosis. 7 OCS (58%) and 25 (46%) of the pathologies were not mentioned in the initial CT reports. The main differentiators of OCS to fracture of PAC were the anteromedial localization into a concave notch at the calcaneal facet at PAC and the continuous corticalization. With increasing size, radiological osteoarthritic signs at the OCS were frequent (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that AOS or pathologies at the PAC often are not exactly described in CT report. In the context of foot trauma, attention should be paid to this region. Based on the presented differentiation criteria, a precise distinction can be made with the help of a CT.

[Challenges of primary hip arthroplasty with high hip dislocation]

BACKGROUND

Endoprosthetic care of high hip dislocation is a surgical challenge. The hip anatomy is greatly altered in these patients, including a rather flat and small acetabulum with impaired bone quality and a relevant chance of a bony defect of the acetabular roof. Additionally, the front coverage and in some cases even the dorsal coverage of the hip are missing. The proximal femur is characterized with an increased antetorsion, a coxa valga position and an enlarged greater trochanter. The medullary cavity is narrowed, the offset is reduced, and the absolut leg length can be enlarged. Further anatomic variations can have been caused by previous surgeries.

AIM OF THE TREATMENT

The goal of the endoprosthetic care is the re-creation of a hip with an anatomic center of rotation, an anatomic offset and equal leg length.

TREATMENT

This can be achieved by a medial shift of the acetabular cup. An acetabular osteotomy including central cancellous bone graft or a bony graft to reinforce the acetabular roof might be necessary. In cases in which an anatomic acetabular cup placement is not possible, a more cranial placement can be done. Further strategies that are essential in several cases are shortening or re-orientation osteotomies of the femur, reaming of the medullary cavity and correct implant selection. Additionally, thorough soft tissue management is of main importance. Generally, the surgery should be well prepared preoperatively.