Delayed ACL Reconstruction in Patients ≥40 Years of Age Is Associated With Increased Risk of Medial Meniscal Injury at 1 Year

After 40 days intra-articular injury, risk profile increases linearly with time to surgery in adolescent patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are becoming more common in youth athletes. Time-to-surgery has been shown to significantly affect the rates of concurrent injuries at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if time-to-surgery in ACLR impacts observances of intra-articular injuries and to categorize injury profile in relation to time.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective cohort study was conducted. Included subjects were aged 21 and below and underwent primary ACLR within 6 months of injury between January 2012 and April 2020. Skeletal maturity was determined via imaging. Laterality, location and severity/pattern of meniscal and chondral injuries were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify risk factors for intra-articular pathology. Cut-off analyses were added to regression models to identify trends of concurrent injuries.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and fifty patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with observed articular cartilage injuries had a significantly longer time-to-surgery of 66 days (p = 0.01). Risk factors for chondral injury were time-to-surgery (p = 0.01) and skeletal maturity (p = 0.01), while medial meniscal tears were prognosticated by time-to-surgery (p = 0.03), skeletal maturity (p = 0.01) and body mass index (p = 0.00). Cut-off analysis showed that after 40 days the proportion of patients with observed chondral injury increased with time to surgery and that there were significantly different observances of chondral (p = 0.00) and medial meniscal (p = 0.03) injuries in the 6-week model, as compared to the continuous time model.

CONCLUSION

Longer time-to-surgery in ACLR is associated with higher rates of concomitant intra-articular pathology, especially chondral injuries. After 40 days, the observed rates of intra-articular injury increase proportionately with time from injury. A 6-week categorical model best stratifies intra-articular injury risk profile. Risk factor analysis identified skeletally mature patients with delayed surgery of >12 weeks to be at the highest risk for both chondral and medial meniscal injuries after an ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

ChatGPT Provides Unsatisfactory Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine whether the free online artificial intelligence platform ChatGPT could accurately, adequately, and appropriately answer questions regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery.

METHODS

A list of 10 questions about ACL surgery was created based on a review of frequently asked questions that appeared on websites of various orthopaedic institutions. Each question was separately entered into ChatGPT (version 3.5), and responses were recorded, scored, and graded independently by 3 authors. The reading level of the ChatGPT response was calculated using the WordCalc software package, and readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook index, Coleman-Liau index, Gunning fog index, and automated readability index.

RESULTS

Of the 10 frequently asked questions entered into ChatGPT, 6 were deemed as unsatisfactory and requiring substantial clarification; 1, as adequate and requiring moderate clarification; 1, as adequate and requiring minor clarification; and 2, as satisfactory and requiring minimal clarification. The mean DISCERN score was 41 (inter-rater reliability, 0.721), indicating the responses to the questions were average. According to the readability assessments, a full understanding of the ChatGPT responses required 13.4 years of education, which corresponds to the reading level of a college sophomore.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the ChatGPT-generated responses were outdated and failed to provide an adequate foundation for patients' understanding regarding their injury and treatment options. The reading level required to understand the responses was too advanced for some patients, leading to potential misunderstanding and misinterpretation of information. ChatGPT lacks the ability to differentiate and prioritize information that is presented to patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Recognizing the shortcomings in artificial intelligence platforms may equip surgeons to better set expectations and provide support for patients considering and preparing for ACL reconstruction.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Allograft in Adults Older Than the Age of 40 Years Shows Similar Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Male and Female Patients

Purpose

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using allograft in patients 40 years of age or older divided by sex.

Methods

Patients age 40 years of age or older who underwent ACL reconstruction by the same surgeon using allograft via anteromedial portal technique were retrospectively identified. Patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner, Lysholm, Marx, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation) were evaluated and recorded, and outcomes were analyzed by sex.

Results

In total, 159 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were reviewed. Two-year outcomes were obtained. All patients noted improvement in patient-reported outcome measures. Male patients had overall greater postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures at all time points for IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm, Marx, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores; however, the only significant time points were IKDC 6 months (P = .016), 1 year (P = .012) and Marx 1 year (P = .007) and 2 year (P = .016). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores similarly showed greater postoperative scores at all time points and statistical significance at 3 months (P = .002), 6 months (P = .033), and 1 year (P = .031).

Conclusions

ACL reconstruction in individuals older than the age of 40 years using allograft results in good outcomes compared with preoperative status. Patient-reported outcomes were similar between male and female patients regarding most patient-reported outcome measures.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Is Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Associated With a Risk of New Meniscal Tears? Reevaluating a Longstanding Paradigm

Background

Delayed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been associated with an increased risk of meniscal tears. However, studies comparing early versus delayed ACL reconstruction have not clearly demonstrated that meniscal tears diagnosed arthroscopically are new injuries as opposed to concomitant injuries sustained during ACL rupture.

Purpose

To determine whether and how delay of ACL reconstruction is associated with risk of "new" meniscal tears (defined as those visualized arthroscopically that had not been detected on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) in adult and pediatric patients.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2013 and 2022 at our institution. To ensure that MRI reflected initial intra-articular pathology, we included only patients who had an MRI scan within 3 weeks after injury (173 pediatric and 369 adult patients). Multivariate Poisson regression was performed to calculate the adjusted relative risk (ARR) of new meniscal tears after delayed (≥8 weeks from injury) operative treatment.

Results

The mean (± SD) time from injury to MRI was 1.0 ± 0.8 weeks for pediatric patients and 1.1 ± 0.7 weeks for adults. Less than half of the meniscal tears observed arthroscopically had been absent on initial MRI. New medial meniscal tears occurred in 15% of pediatric patients and 16% of adults. New lateral meniscal tears occurred in 48% of pediatric patients and 34% of adults. Among pediatric patients, delayed ACL reconstruction was associated with higher risk of new medial tears (ARR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5-10) but not lateral tears (ARR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5). In contrast, adults had no significant increase in risk of meniscal tears associated with operative delay.

Conclusion

Delayed ACL reconstruction may be acceptable in adults, who may be less active and less injury-prone than children and adolescents.

Meniscal repair failure following concurrent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the New Zealand ACL Registry

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for meniscal repair failure following concurrent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Prospective data recorded by the New Zealand ACL Registry and the Accident Compensation Corporation were reviewed. Meniscal repairs performed during concurrent primary ACL reconstruction were included. Repair failure was defined as a subsequent reoperation involving meniscectomy of the repaired meniscus. Multivariate survival analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for failure.

RESULTS

A total of 3,024 meniscal repairs were analysed with an overall failure rate of 6.6% (n = 201) at a mean follow-up of 2.9 years (SD 1.5). The risk of medial meniscal repair failure was higher with hamstring tendon autografts (adjusted HR [aHR] = 2.20, 95% CI 1.36-3.56, p = 0.001), patients aged 21-30 years (aHR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.30-2.48, p = 0.037) and in patients with cartilage injury in the medial compartment (aHR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.23-2.48, p = 0.002). The risk of lateral meniscal repair failure was higher in patients aged ≤ 20 years (aHR = 2.79, 95% CI 1.17-6.67, p = 0.021), when the procedure was performed by a low case volume surgeon (aHR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.13, p = 0.026) and when a transtibial technique was used to drill the femoral graft tunnel (aHR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.03-5.15, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

The use of a hamstring tendon autograft, younger age and the presence of medial compartment cartilage injury are risk factors for medial meniscal repair failure, whereas younger age, low surgeon volume and a transtibial drilling technique are risk factors for lateral meniscal repair failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Delaying ACL reconstruction is associated with increased rates of medial meniscal tear

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the time from injury to ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and the rate as well as repairability of meniscal tears. Secondary aims were to evaluate the relationship between meniscal injury and Tegner Activity Scale, age, BMI, and gender.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2022, 1,840 consecutive ACLRs were performed. A total of 1,317 ACLRs were included with a mean patient age of 31.2 years ± 10.5 [16-60]. Meniscal tear was assessed during arthroscopy using the ISAKOS classification. Time from injury to ACLR, Tegner Activity Scale, age, BMI and gender were analysed in uni- and then in multivariate analyses. Patients were divided into four groups according to the time from injury to surgery: < 3 months (427; 32%), 3-6 months (388; 29%), 6-12 months (248; 19%) and > 12 months (254; 19%).

RESULTS

Delaying ACLR > 12 months significantly increased the rate of medial meniscal (MM) injury (OR 1.14; p < 0.001). No correlation was found between a 3- or 6-month time from injury to surgery and MM tear. Performing ACLR > 3, 6, or 12 months after injury did not significantly increase the rate of lateral meniscal (LM) injury. Increasing Tegner activity scale was significantly associated with a lower rate of MM injury (OR 0.90; p = 0.020). An age > 30 years (OR 1.07; p = 0.025) and male gender (OR 1.13; p < 0.0001) was also associated with an increased rate of MM injury. Age > 30 years decreased the rate of MM repair (OR 0.85; p < 0.001). Male gender increased the rate of LM tear (OR 1.10; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Performing ACLR more than 12 months after injury was associated with increased rates of MM injury but not with lower rates of repairable lesions. An increased pre-injury Tegner activity score was associated with a decreased rate of MM tear. Age > 30 years was associated with an increased rate of MM tear with concomitant ACL injury and a decreased rate of repairability of MM tear. ACLR should be performed within 12 months from injury to prevent from the risk of MM injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Delaying anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases the rate and severity of medial chondral injuries

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between chondral injury and interval from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear to surgical reconstruction (ACLr).

Methods

Between January 2012 and January 2022, 1,840 consecutive ACLrs were performed and included in a single-centre retrospective cohort. Exclusion criteria were partial tears, multiligament knee injuries, prior ipsilateral knee surgery, concomitant unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy, ACL agenesis, and unknown date of tear. A total of 1,317 patients were included in the final analysis, with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range (IQR) 23 to 38). The median preoperative Tegner Activity Score (TAS) was 6 (IQR 6 to 7). Patients were categorized into four groups according to the delay to ACLr: < three months (427; 32%), three to six months (388; 29%), > six to 12 months (248; 19%), and > 12 months (254; 19%). Chondral injury was assessed during arthroscopy using the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society classification, and its association with delay to ACLr was analyzed using multivariable analysis.

Results

In the medial compartment, delaying ACLr for more than 12 months was associated with an increased rate (odds ratio (OR) 1.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 2.95); p = 0.002) and severity (OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.40); p = 0.002) of chondral injuries, compared with < three months, with no association in patients aged > 50 years old. No association was found for shorter delays, but the overall dose-effect analysis was significant for the rate (p = 0.015) and severity (p = 0.026) of medial chondral injuries. Increased TAS was associated with a significantly reduced rate (OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.99); p = 0.036) and severity (OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.99); p = 0.017) of medial chondral injuries. In the lateral compartment, no association was found between delay and chondral injuries.

Conclusion

Delay was associated with an increased rate and severity of medial chondral injuries in a dose-effect fashion, in particular for delays > 12 months. Younger patients seem to be at higher risk of chondral injury when delaying surgery. The timing of ACLr should be optimally reduced in this population.

Subjective Outcomes After Allograft Reconstruction and Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures Are Similar in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older: A 2:1 Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Purpose

To compare subjective outcomes and rates of subsequent operations for patients aged 40 years and older with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures who elected nonoperative management or allograft ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods

This was a retrospective study comparing 2-year minimum results of nonoperative treatment and primary allograft ACLR among patients aged 40 years and older presenting to a single institution between the years 2005 and 2016. Patients who elected nonoperative management were 2:1 propensity score (PS)-matched to patients who elected ACLR based on age, sex, body mass index, sports-related mechanism of injury, Outerbridge grade III or IV chondral lesions, and medial or lateral meniscus tears. Univariate analysis was performed to compare subjective outcome measures of International Knee Documentation Committee and Marx activity level scores, subsequent operations, and satisfaction rates.

Results

After 2:1 PS matching, 40 ACLR and 20 nonoperative patients with mean ages of 52.2 years and 54.5 years, respectively, were included with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years (SD 2.1 years, range 2.3-10.6 years). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the matching variables. There were no significant differences in International Knee Documentation Committee scores (81.9 ± 14.1, CI 77.4-86.5 vs 84.3 ± 12.8, CI 78.3-90.3, P = .53), Marx activity level scores (5.8 ± 4.8, CI 4.2-7.3 vs 5.7 ± 5.1, CI 3.3-8.1, P = .96), or satisfaction rates (100% vs 90%, P = .11) between the ACLR and nonoperative groups. Four (10%) patients who underwent ACLR sustained a graft treated with revision ACLR. 7 (17.5%) ACLR and 0 nonoperative patients subsequently received further ipsilateral knee surgeries (P = .08), including 2 total knee arthroplasties.

Conclusions

In this PS-matched analysis of patients aged 40 years and older with ACL ruptures, patients who elected nonoperative management had similar subjective outcomes compared with those who elected allograft ACLR. Patients who elected allograft ACLR did not have fewer subsequent operations than those who elected nonoperative treatment.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative factors associated with failure to reach the patient acceptable symptom state after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 40 and older

PURPOSE

To perform a predictive analysis to identify preoperative patient factors associated with failure to achieve a newly defined patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients aged ≥ 40 years with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective review of all patients aged 40 years or older receiving a primary allograft ACLR at a single institution between the years of 2005 and 2016, with 2-year minimum follow-up. Using an updated PASS threshold of 66.7 for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score previously established for this patient cohort, a univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify preoperative patient characteristics predictive of failure to achieve PASS.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 2.1 years (range 2.7 - 11.2) were included in the analysis (48.5 ± 5.6 years, 51.8% female, Body Mass Index (BMI) 25.9 ± 4.4). PASS was achieved by 162 patients (82.2%). Patients who failed to achieve PASS more often had lateral compartment cartilage defects (P = 0.001) and lateral meniscus tears (P = 0.004), higher BMIs (P = 0.004), and Workers' Compensation status (P = 0.043) on univariable analysis. Factors predictive of failure to achieve PASS on multivariable analysis included BMI and lateral compartment cartilage defect (OR 1.12 [1.03-1.23], P = 0.013; OR 5.1 [1.87-13.9], P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients ≥ 40 years who receive a primary allograft ACLR, patients who fail to achieve PASS more often had lateral compartment cartilage defects and higher BMIs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Revision Soft-Tissue Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated With Lower Patient-Reported Outcomes Compared With Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 40 and Older

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and graft failure rates in revision allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients aged 40 and older and compare them with primary ACLRs.

METHODS

Patients aged 40 and older who underwent arthroscopic soft-tissue allograft ACLR between 2005 and 2016 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on revision versus primary ACLR. The rate of achieving an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) score was recorded. Patient satisfaction, PROs, and graft failure were compared between groups using the χ² test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

We identified 32 patients who underwent revision ACLR and 201 patients who underwent primary ACLR aged 40 and older who met inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 6.2 and 6.9 years, respectively (P = .042). There was a lower rate of concomitant meniscal repair in the primary ACLR group (6% vs 21.9%, P = .007) There were no other differences in chondral injuries, mechanism of injury, or meniscal injuries between groups. The median IKDC score was greater in the primary ACLR group as compared with the revision ACLR group (83.9 vs 70.6, P < .001). Patients who underwent revision ACLR were less likely to achieve the IKDC PASS threshold (82.5% vs 56.3%, P = .001) and were less likely to report satisfaction as compared with patients who underwent primary ACLR (90.5% vs 78.1%, P =.038). No difference in graft failure rates was identified between groups (8% vs 15.6%, P = .180).

CONCLUSIONS

Revision allograft ACLR in patients aged 40 and older was associated with lower PROs compared with primary ACLR. Patients who underwent revision ACLR failed to meet the IKDC PASS threshold more often and were dissatisfied with procedure results more than twice as often as patients that underwent primary ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Editorial Commentary: Autograft, Early Surgery, 2-Stage Surgery for 1 cm of Tunnel Widening or Greater, and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis May Improve Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a challenging procedure. Results are less satisfactory than those of primary ACLR owing to bone defects, altered anatomic landmarks, and concomitant injuries. Modifiable factors such as autograft, early surgery, 2-stage surgery for 1 cm of tunnel widening or greater, and anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis may improve outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery. Finally, it is important to consider patients' expectations after revision ACLR when counseling patients and making surgical decisions.

Acute and subacute anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are associated with a higher risk of revision and reoperation

PURPOSE

(1) Report concomitant cartilage and meniscal injury at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), (2) evaluate the risk of aseptic revision ACLR during follow-up, and (3) evaluate the risk of aseptic ipsilateral reoperation during follow-up.

METHODS

Using a United States integrated healthcare system's ACLR registry, patients who underwent primary isolated ACLR were identified (2010-2018). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision, with a secondary outcome evaluating ipsilateral aseptic reoperation. Outcomes were evaluated by time from injury to ACLR: acute (< 3 weeks), subacute (3 weeks-3 months), delayed (3-9 months), and chronic (≥ 9 months).

RESULTS

The final sample included 270 acute (< 3 weeks), 5971 subacute (3 weeks-3 months), 5959 delayed (3-9 months), and 3595 chronic (≥ 9 months) ACLR. Medial meniscus [55.4% (1990/3595 chronic) vs 38.9% (105/270 acute)] and chondral injuries [40.0% (1437/3595 chronic) vs 24.8% (67/270 acute)] at the time of ACLR were more common in the chronic versus acute groups. The crude 6-year revision rate was 12.9% for acute ACLR, 7.0% for subacute, 5.1% for delayed, and 4.4% for chronic ACLR; reoperation rates a 6-year follow-up was 15.0% for acute ACLR, 9.6% for subacute, 6.4% for delayed, and 8.1% for chronic ACLR. After adjustment for covariates, acute and subacute ACLR had higher risks for aseptic revision (acute HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.07-2.72, p = 0.026; subacute HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, p = 0.040) and aseptic reoperation (acute HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.43-2.91, p < 0.001; subacute HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54, p = 0.002) when compared to chronic ACLR.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort study, while more meniscal and chondral injuries were reported for ACLR performed ≥ 9 months after the date of injury, a lower risk of revision and reoperation was observed following chronic ACLR relative to patients undergoing surgery in acute or subacute fashions.

Medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears, while type I ACL tears only account for 8% of all ACL tears

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the distribution of different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear locations in different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) planes, and to explore the relationships of ACL tear types with both meniscus injuries and bone bruising.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in patients under 60 years old who underwent MRI scans in the sagittal and coronal oblique planes of the knee for ACL tears between 2014 and 2020. Patients with reports of chronic tears, partial tears, or prior surgeries were excluded. Tear locations were classified into five types, and the meniscus tear measurement variables included the presence of ramp, root, bucket-handle, and other types of tears. All injuries were confirmed by arthroscopy. Meanwhile, the presence and location of bone bruising were analysed and scored with the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) bone bruising subscale.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients were included. The prevalence rates of type I and type III injuries were 23/291 (7.9%) and 145/291 (49.8%) in the sagittal plane and 22/291 (7.6%) and 179/291 (61.5%) in the oblique coronal plane, respectively. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears with ACL tears was 126/291 (43.3%), while that of lateral meniscus tears with ACL tears was 77/291 (26.5%). The highest prevalence of medial meniscus injury with ACL tears was 15/22 (68.2%) for type I injuries. Bone bruises were located on the lateral femoral center in 125 patients (46%) and on the lateral tibia posterior in 132 patients (48%); the common areas of bone bruising were slightly correlated with type III ACL tears but not correlated with type I ACL tears.

CONCLUSION

The plane in which an MRI scan is performed affects the classification of ACL tears. The tear type is associated with the prevalence of medial meniscus injuries, and medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Combined Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction

There has been a substantial increase in the number of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed in the past decade. This Technical Note describes combined revision ACL and anterolateral ligament reconstruction using outside-in drilling, which avoids the need for 2-stage revision ACL reconstruction because it allows unconstrained anatomic placement.

A longer duration from injury to surgery is associated with preoperative deterioration of an isolated meniscal tear in patients aged 40 years or older

PURPOSE

To evaluate the preoperative deterioration of an isolated meniscal tear in patients aged 40 years or older, and whether time from injury to surgery is associated with worsening of a meniscal tear.

METHODS

Patients aged 40 years or older who underwent arthroscopic surgery for isolated meniscal tear between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and arthroscopic findings were compared to evaluate the deterioration of meniscal tears. Predictors of the development of meniscal tears; patient demographic factors, duration from injury to surgery (injury to MRI and MRI to surgery), and image findings were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients (58 knees) were included (mean age, 55.9 ± 8.5 years; male/female, 31/27). An isolated meniscal tear deteriorated in 28 (48.3%). Compared patients with and without deteriorated meniscal tear, significant differences were found in the MRI grade of meniscal tear (p = 0.03), duration from injury to MRI (164.2 ± 167.9 vs 45.2 ± 48.7 days, p < 0.001), and from MRI to surgery (148.8 ± 91.1 vs 67.6 ± 56.7 days, p < 0.001). A multivariate regression analysis showed that the duration from injury to MRI (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; p < 0.001) and from MRI to surgery (OR, 1.02; p < 0.001) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 50% of isolated meniscal tears deteriorated preoperatively in patients aged 40 years or older. The duration from injury to surgery was an independent predictor of worsening of an isolated meniscal tear.

The Majority of Patients Aged 40 and Older Having Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Achieve a Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient satisfaction, retear rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients aged 40 and older undergoing allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The secondary goal was to compare these parameters between groups of patients with intact versus failed grafts, and to evaluate these in relation to a historically reported International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) patient-acceptable symptoms state (PASS) score.

METHODS

Records of patients aged 40 and older who underwent ACLR between 2005 and 2016 at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-reported satisfaction, outcome scores, and failure rates were analyzed. The rate of achieving a previously defined IKDC PASS score based on younger cohorts was reported, and an updated PASS threshold for older patients was calculated.

RESULTS

201 patients were included with a mean age of 48.6 years (range: 40-68) and mean follow-up of 6.2 years (range: 2.8-11.2). 182 (90.5%) patients reported satisfaction following surgery. 16 (8.0%) patients experienced failure of their ACLR, 10 of which underwent revision ACLR. The median IKDC score in the intact ACLR group was 86.2, compared to 66.7 in the failure group (P < .001). In total, 134 (72.4%) patients in the intact group achieved the historical PASS score of 75.9 on IKDC compared to only 4 (25%) in the failure group (χ² = 15.396, P < .001). An updated IKDC PASS threshold for older cohorts was calculated to be 66.7.

CONCLUSION

Patients aged 40 and older who underwent allograft ACLR had an 8.0% failure rate at a mean follow-up of 6 years. Graft failure in patients aged 40 and older was associated with worse PROs. The majority of patients achieved the historically reported IKDC PASS threshold. Additionally, an updated age-appropriate IKDC PASS score of 66.7 was calculated to aid in future ACLR studies assessing older patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Level IV.

Predictive Factors Associated With Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Time to Return to Activity After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Nonathletes

Background:

Although arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is a widely implemented surgical procedure, studies investigating the time to return to activity (RTA) are rare.

Purpose:

To explore which factors are associated with the RTA times after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and to investigate whether those factors can also improve short-term patient-reported outcomes.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The authors reviewed the records of patients who underwent isolated partial meniscectomy in their institution from January 2017 to December 2019. Patient and injury characteristics were documented, and time to RTA was obtained via phone interview in January 2021. Pre- and postoperative outcomes were assessed with the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. The chi-square test and independent-samples t test were used to evaluate differences in outcome scores and time to RTA according to the patient and injury characteristics, and risk factors with a P value <.1 in the univariate analysis were used in the binary regression.

Results:

Included were 215 patients (87 men and 128 women; mean age, 33.7 years [range, 24-75 years]). Of these patients, 204 provided information on time to RTA (mean, 3.3 months). By 3 months postoperatively, 49.5% (101/204) of patients could perform activities without knee-related restriction; this improved to 69.6% (142/204) at 6 months and 90.2% (184/204) at 12 months. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-1.19; P = .044) and injury duration (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.19-1.07; P = .032) were significantly associated with the time to RTA. IKDC scores improved significantly from 41.2 preoperatively to 76.7 postoperatively, and in the multivariate logistic regression model, female sex (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.10-6.47; P = .030), body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m² (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.02-8.66; P = .047), and medial meniscal tear (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-1.00; P = .050) were associated with inferior outcome scores.

Conclusion:

Patients aged 40 years and younger who underwent partial meniscectomy surgery within 6 months after a meniscal tear were more likely to have a shorter time to RTA, and female patients with obesity (BMI ≥27 kg/m2), especially those with medial meniscal tears, tended to have inferior clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Treated Nonoperatively Versus With Reconstruction: Risk of Subsequent Surgery

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears can be devastating injuries, leading to joint instability, meniscal tears, and subsequent arthritis. It is unknown whether ACL reconstruction (ACLR) alters the natural history of joint degeneration in the ACL-deficient knee compared with nonoperative treatment, and few studies have examined outcomes in middle-aged patients.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the midterm risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery in middle-aged patients after an ACL injury treated with initial conservative (nonoperative) management (CM) versus ACLR (operative management [OM]) within 6 months of the diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We performed an electronic database search from 2011 to 2012 for all patients aged 35 to 55 years with an initial diagnosis of magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed ACL tear. Patients who elected CM and those who underwent ACLR within 6 months of the diagnosis (OM) were identified. Index patient and clinical characteristics were collected from the health record. All patients were longitudinally observed until August 31, 2017. The primary outcome was subsequent ipsilateral knee surgeries, and secondary outcomes included contralateral knee surgeries, deep surgical-site infections, and venous thrombotic events.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 4.8 ± 0.6 years. The CM group included 463 patients (40.2%) and the OM group included 690 patients (59.8%). The mean ages were 43.9 ± 5.7 years and 42.7 ± 5.3 years for patients in the CM and OM groups, respectively (P < .001). Obesity and smoking were significantly more common in the CM group. During the follow-up, 180 patients (38.9%) in the CM group underwent subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery compared with 73 (10.6%) patients in the OM group (P < .001). The mean time to the first ipsilateral procedure was 0.9 ± 1.1 years in the CM and 2 ± 1.5 years in the OM group (P < .001). Delayed ipsilateral ACLRs were performed in 81 patients in the CM group (17.5%); non-ACLR ipsilateral knee surgeries were performed in 156 patients in the CM group (33.7%). Contralateral knee surgery rates were similar. In a regression model, after controlling for age, sex, the Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and smoking status, it was found that normal body mass index and CM group were risk factors for undergoing subsequent knee surgery or ipsilateral non-ACLR surgery.

CONCLUSION

Excluding delayed ACLR, subsequent ipsilateral knee surgeries were more common and occurred earlier in middle-aged patients with nonoperatively managed ACL tears compared with patients managed with reconstruction.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft in Patients Aged 50 and Older Leads to Improved Activity Levels and Acceptable Patient-Reported Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes in patients aged 50 years and older undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft with minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive series of patients aged 50 and older who underwent ACLR using BPTB allograft by a single surgeon with minimum 2-year follow-up. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Physical Component Summary of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey were used to assess outcomes, as well as preoperative and postoperative Tegner activity scores, which were compared using a paired sample t test.

RESULTS

Fifty patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 55.3 ± 4.4 years and mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 1.9 years. Tegner activity scores improved from a mean preoperative score of 3.26 to a mean postoperative score of 5.25 (P < .001). The mean postoperative scores for Lysholm, IKDC, and Physical Component Summary were 87.3, 81.1, and 54.3, respectively. In total, 36 (72%) patients achieved a patient acceptable symptom state score for IKDC and 37 (74%) patients achieved a minimal clinically important difference for Tegner activity score. Thirty-eight (76%) patients reported good-to-excellent results, 6 (12%) patients reported fair results, and 6 (12%) patients reported poor results.

CONCLUSIONS

ACLR with BPTB allograft in patients aged 50 and older leads to good patient-reported outcomes with significantly increased postoperative activity status at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Accurate placement of a tibial tunnel significantly improves meniscal healing and clinical outcomes at 1 year after medial meniscus posterior root repair

PURPOSE

A medial meniscus posterior root tear results in the loss of meniscal circumferential hoop stress and causes a pathological posteromedial extrusion of the medial meniscus. Although creating a tibial tunnel in the anatomic place improves postoperative medial meniscus posterior extrusion, no studies have evaluated the relationship between tibial tunnel position and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate how tibial tunnel positioning of medial meniscus posterior root pullout repair affects meniscal healing status and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with 64 medial meniscus posterior root tears (mean age 62.8 ± 7.9 years) who had undergone pullout repairs and second-look arthroscopies were included. All 62 patients were Lachman test negative. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using a rectangular measurement grid to assess the tibial tunnel centre and medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was undertaken to determine displacement distance from the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre to the tibial tunnel centre and a meniscal healing score, as well as clinical outcomes at 1 year post-repair.

RESULTS

Tibial tunnel centres were located more anteriorly and medially than the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre (mean distance 5.0 ± 2.2 mm). The mean meniscal healing score was 6.7 ± 1.8 of 10 possible points. The 1-year postoperative clinical scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative scores for all the items. There was a significant negative correlation in the absolute distance between the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre and the tibial tunnel centre with the meniscal healing score (ρ =  - 0.39, p = 0.002). Furthermore, there were significant positive correlations between the distance between the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre and the tibial tunnel centre in the mediolateral direction and patient-based clinical outcomes (ρ = 0.25-0.43, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Accurate placement of a tibial tunnel, especially in the mediolateral direction, significantly improved meniscal healing and clinical outcomes at 1 year following medial meniscus posterior root repair. Surgeons should create a medial meniscus posterior root tibial tunnel at the anatomic attachment with particular attention to the mediolateral position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Relationship With Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult.

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears.

RESULTS

After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended.

REGISTRATION

CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).

Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases the incidence of medial meniscal bucket handle tears and medial compartment chondral injuries in patients aged 40 years and older

INTRODUCTION

No widely accepted evidence-based indications exist for the initial surgical management of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries ≥ 40 years old, and treatment for these patients remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between elapsed time from ACL injury to surgery and the incidence of meniscal tears and chondral injury in patients aged ≥ 40 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were divided into two groups based on elapsed time from injury to surgery: early group, < 12 months; and delayed group, ≥ 12 months. Patient records were reviewed for incidence and types of meniscal tears and chondral injuries in each group. Chondral injury grades were evaluated with International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) Criteria.

RESULTS

This study evaluated 67 knees in the early group and 33 knees in the delayed group. Mean ages in each group were 46.9 ± 6.5 and 46.9 ± 6.0. The delayed group showed significantly higher rates of medial meniscal tear [31 of 33, 93.9% vs 29 of 67, 43.3%; P < 0.0001; odds ratio (OR), 20.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.49-91.9], medial femoral condyle chondral injuries ≥ ICRS grade II (15 of 33, 45.5% vs 8 of 67, 11.9%; P < 0.001; OR, 6.15; 95% CI 2.24-16.83), and medial tibial chondral injuries ≥ ICRS grade II (7 of 33, 21.2% vs 3 of 67, 4.5%; P < 0.05; OR, 5.74; 95% CI 1.38-23.9) compared with the early group. With respect to types of medial meniscal tear, the delayed group showed a significantly higher frequency of bucket handle tears (11 of 33, 33.3%) compared with the early group (2 of 67, 3.0%; P < 0.0001; OR, 16.25; 95% CI 3.34-79.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed ACL reconstruction was associated with increased incidence of chondral injuries and medial meniscal tears, particularly bucket handle tears in this cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Increased Total Cost and Lack of Diagnostic Utility for Emergency Department Visits After ACL Injury

Background:

Patients are commonly evaluated at the emergency department (ED) with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, but providers without orthopaedics training may struggle to correctly diagnose these injuries.

Hypothesis:

It was hypothesized that few patients would be diagnosed with an ACL tear while in the ED and that these patients would be of lower socioeconomic status and more likely to have public insurance.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The 2017 State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD) and State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) from the state of Florida were utilized in this study. Cases with Current Procedural Terminology code 29888 (arthroscopically aided ACL reconstruction [ACLR]) were selected from the SASD, and data from the SEDD were matched to patients who had an ED visit for a knee injury within 120 days before ACLR. Chi-square analysis was used to test for differences in patient and surgical variables between the ED visit and nonvisit patient groups. A generalized linear model was created to model the effect of ED visit on total cost for an ACL injury.

Results:

While controlling for differences in patient characteristics and concomitant procedure usage, a visit to the ED added $4587 in total cost (P < .001). The ED visit cohort contained a greater proportion of patients with Medicaid (20.2% vs 9.1%), patients who were Black (18.4% vs 10.3%), and patients in the lowest income quartile (34.4% vs 25.0%) (P < .001 for all). In the ED visit cohort, 14.4% of patients received an allograft versus 10.1% in the non-ED visit cohort (P = .001) despite having a similar mean age. An ACL sprain was diagnosed in only 29 of the 645 (4.5%) patients who visited the ED.

Conclusion:

Utilizing the ED for care after an ACL injury was expensive, averaging a $4587 increase in total cost associated with ACLR. However, patients rarely left with a definitive diagnosis, with only 4.5% of patients who underwent ACLR being correctly diagnosed with an ACL tear in the ED. This additional cost was levied disproportionately on patients of low socioeconomic status and patients with Medicaid.

Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Increases the Risk of Abnormal Prereconstruction Laxity, Cartilage, and Medial Meniscus Injuries

PURPOSE

To determine the association between a delay in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and cartilage injuries, meniscus injuries, meniscus repair, and abnormal prereconstruction laxity.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary ACLR at our institution from January 2005 to March 2017, with no associated ligament injuries, were identified. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate whether delay in ACLR, age, sex, and BMI were risk factors for cartilage and meniscus injuries, meniscus repair, and abnormal (side-to-side difference >5 mm) prereconstruction laxity.

RESULTS

A total of 3976 patients (mean age 28.6 ± 10.6 years, range 10-61 years) were included. The risk of cartilage injury increased with a delay in ACLR (12-24 months: odds ratio [OR] 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.29; P = .005; and > 24 months: OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.11-1.30; P < .001) and age ≥30 years (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.98-2.60; P < .001). The risk of medial meniscus (MM) injury increased with a delay in ACLR (12-24 months: OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07-1.29; P = .001; and >24 months: OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.13-1.30; P < .001), male sex (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.04-1.30; P = .04) and age ≥30 years (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.04-1.33; P = .008). The risk of lateral meniscus (LM) injury decreased with a delay in ACLR of >3 months and age ≥30 years (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.66-0.85; P < .001), whereas it increased with male sex (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.22-1.41; P < .001). MM repairs relative to MM injury decreased with a delay in ACLR (6-12 months: OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.92; P = .01; 12-24 months: OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.85; P < .001; >24 months: OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52-0.72; P < .001) and age ≥30 years (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.48-0.74; P < .001). LM repairs relative to LM injury only decreased with age ≥30 years (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.26-0.45; P < .001). The risk of having abnormal knee laxity increased with a delay in ACLR of >6 months and MM injury (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.16-1.97; P = .002), whereas it decreased with a BMI of ≥25 (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

A delay in ACLR of >12 months increased the risk of cartilage and MM injuries, whereas a delay of >6 months increased the risk of abnormal prereconstruction laxity and reduced the likelihood of MM repair. To reduce meniscus loss and the risk of jeopardizing knee laxity, ACLR should be performed within 6 months after the injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative study.

Which factors are associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair?

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the potential factors associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair

Methods Patients who received partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair in our institution from Jan 2015 to Dec 2019 were included in current study. The inclusion criteria were (1) meniscus tear treated using meniscectomy or repair, (2) with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, (3) not multiligamentous injury. Demographic data, including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), injury-to-surgery interval and intra-articular factors such as the location of injury, medial or lateral, ACL rupture or not and the option of procedure (partial meniscectomy or repair) were documented from medical records. Univariate analysis consisted of chi-square. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to adjust for confounding factors.

Results 592 patients including 399 males and 193 females with a mean age of 28.7 years (range from 10 to 75 years) were included in current study. In the univariate analysis, male (p = 0.002), patients aged 40 years or younger (p < 0.001), increased weight (p = 0.010), Posterior meniscus torn (0.011), concurrent ACL ruputure (p < 0.001), lateral meniscus (p = 0.039) and early surgery (p < 0.001) were all associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair. However, After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that age (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 - 0.68, p = 0.002), ACL injury (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.97 – 7.21, p < 0.001), side of menisci (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.43 – 7.55, p = 0.005), site of tear (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07 – 0.32, p < 0.001), and duration of injury (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 – 0.82, p = 0.008) were associated with the prevalence of meniscus repair.

Conclusions Meniscal tear in aged patients especially those with concomitant ACL injury is likely to be repaired. Additionally, in order to increase the prevalence of repair and slow down progression of OA, the surgical procedure should be performed within two weeks after meniscus tear especially when the tear is located at lateral meniscal posterior.

Study design

Case-control study; level of evidence, 3.

Acute and delayed anterior cruciate ligament repair results in similar short to mid-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

To assess whether primary repair of proximal ACL tears in the delayed setting leads to similar clinical and functional outcomes as compared to ACL repair in the acute setting.

METHODS

All patients with proximal tears with good tissue quality treated in the acute (≤3 weeks post-injury) and delayed setting (>3 months post-injury) were retrospectively reviewed at minimum 2-year follow-up. Ipsilateral reinjury or reoperation and contralateral injury rates were recorded. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm, modified Cincinnati, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective, Forgotten Joint Score-12, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale, and satisfaction scores. Finally, time to return to work, time to discontinue brace-usage, time to running, and time to return to sports were reviewed. Group differences were compared using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included, of which 34 (49%) were treated acutely and 35 (51%) in the delayed setting. Besides time from injury to surgery, patient demographics were similar between groups (all p > 0.1). There were three reinjuries (9%) in the acute group and four in the delayed (11%; p > 0.999). Reoperation, complication, and contralateral injury rates were similar between groups (all p > 0.1), while functional outcomes were also comparable (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study found that acute and delayed primary ACL repair results in similar clinical and functional outcomes at short to mid-term follow-up. Therefore, the most important factors for repair surgery success seem to be tissue quality and tissue length, rather than acuity of the surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative cohort study.

Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Experience With 91 Patients (40 Elite Athletes) Using an Algorithm

BACKGROUND

The increased prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has led to an increased need for revision ACL reconstructions. Despite the growing body of literature indicating that single-stage revision ACL reconstruction can yield good outcomes, there is a lack of data for determining when and how to safely perform a single-stage revision.

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes, graft failure rates, and return-to-play rates of a decision-making algorithm for single-stage revision ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of revision ACL reconstructions performed by the senior author between September 2009 and July 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients were assessed, and decision making was undertaken according to the algorithm. Outcomes measured were further surgery, graft rerupture, re-revision, Tegner score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). For the elite athlete population, return-to-play time, duration, and level of play after surgery as compared with preinjury were also determined.

RESULTS

During this period, 93 procedures were performed in 92 patients (40 elite athletes). Two 2-stage procedures were undertaken, leaving 91 single-stage procedures (91 patients) to form the basis for further study. At a mean 4.3 years (SD, 2.2 years) after surgery, there had been 2 re-revisions (2.2%) and 2 further instances of graft failure that had not been re-revised (total graft failure rate, 4.4%). There were 17 subsequent procedures, including 6 arthroscopic partial meniscectomies, 5 removals of prominent implants, and 1 total knee arthroplasty. The mean Tegner score was 8.02 before graft rerupture and 7.1 at follow-up. At follow-up, the mean KOOS outcomes were 79.3 for Symptoms, 88.0 for Pain, 94.2 for Activities of Daily Living, 73.6 for Sport, and 68.9 for Quality of Life. Of 40 elite athletes, 35 returned to play at a mean 11.2 months (SD, 3.6 months) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage revision ACL reconstructions can be performed reliably in the majority of patients, with good clinical outcomes, low rerupture rates, and high-return-to play rates, even in the elite athlete population.

The predictive factors that are associated with the number of sutures used during meniscal repair

Purpose

To investigate factors associated with the consumption of a large number of sutures during arthroscopic meniscus repair procedures.

Methods

All patients who received meniscal repair, with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were included in the current study. Demographic data (sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and injury-to-surgery interval) and surgical data (the site of the tear, side of the meniscus, presence of an ACL rupture or not and the number of sutures) were retrospectively collected from our medical records. The number of sutures was divided into two groups (1–2 sutures versus > 2 sutures). The stitching process was implemented through an all-inside technique using a meniscal repair device (Fast-Fix; Smith & Nephew). According to the length and stability of the meniscal tear, one to seven sutures were used. Univariate analysis consisted of chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to adjust for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 242 patients, including 168 males and 57 females, was finally included. In the univariate analysis, we found that those patients who underwent meniscus repair within one month after meniscus tear were more likely to need fewer sutures than those who underwent surgery more than one month after injury (70/110 versus 59/115, p=0.062). In total, 75/109 (68.8%) lateral meniscal tears were repaired with fewer sutures than medial (34/72, 47.2%) and bilateral meniscus injuries (20/44, 45.4%; p=0.003). In the multivariate analysis, we found that the duration of injury (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.16–3.64, p=0.013), presence of an ACL injury (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.97–7.21, p< 0.001) and the side of the meniscus (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14–0.65, p=0.002) were associated with the number of sutures used during meniscal repair procedures.

Conclusions

Patients who underwent meniscal repair within one month after meniscus tear, especially lateral menisci tears, were more likely to need fewer sutures.

Study design

Case-control study; level of evidence, 3.

Evidence-based Risk Stratification for Sport Medicine Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Orthopaedic practices have been markedly affected by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the ban on elective procedures, it is impossible to define the medical urgency of a case solely on whether a case is on an elective surgery schedule. Orthopaedic surgical procedures should consider COVID-19-associated risks and an assimilation of all available disease dependent, disease independent, and logistical information that is tailored to each patient, institution, and region. Using an evidence-based risk stratification of clinical urgency, we provide a framework for prioritization of orthopaedic sport medicine procedures that encompasses such factors. This can be used to facilitate the risk-benefit assessment of the timing and setting of a procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prevalence of concomitant knee injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament tear in kabaddi and football players

BACKGROUND

There is little literature available about the type of sports and concomitant knee injury.

THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To help in better prediction of concomitant knee injuries in football and kabaddi players.

MATERIAL METHOD

Five hundred and seventeen male athletes [Football (n = 226) and Kabaddi players (n = 291)] aged between 16 and 35 years were enrolled in the study. These were categorized into five groups depending upon the time interval between injury and surgery (0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-9 months, 9-12 months, 12-18 months and 18-24 months). Meniscal and chondral damage present at the time of ACL reconstruction was documented.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of meniscal tear was more in kabaddi players (220/291) as compared to football players (144/226; p = 0.003). The incidence of both menisci tear was more in kabaddi as compared to football (p = 0.02). Incidence of lateral meniscus tear (147/291) in kabaddi was more as compared to football (84/226; p = 0.002). The incidence of condylar damage was comparable in both groups. Medial femoral condyle was more commonly injured in both the sports irrespective of time frame.

CONCLUSION

The chances of meniscus injuries were more in kabaddi players compared to football players in ACL deficient knee. The time interval between injury and surgery had a direct correlation with meniscus and chondral injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective study.

Clinical Outcomes and the Failure Rate of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Were Comparable Between Patients Younger Than 40 Years and Patients Older Than 40 Years: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes and failure rates of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between young and middle-aged surgery patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent revision ACLRs between January 2008 and June 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to age: ≥40 years (group A) and <40 years (group B). Detailed patient demographic data, preoperative radiographic data, and concurrent meniscal and chondral lesion were reviewed. Clinical scores, laxity tests results, and graft failures were compared between groups at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (group A, n = 24, 46.6 ± 4.5 years; group B, n = 62, 26.2 ± 6.3 years) were included in this study. Demographic data showed that the time interval from primary to revision ACLR was longer in group A than in group B (96.2 ± 80.9 vs. 52.0 ± 42.1 months, P = .011). Group A had a higher prevalence of chondral defects of the trochlea (P = .016). No significant differences were identified in the prevalence and severity of meniscal lesions. At the final follow-up, all clinical scores were improved postoperatively but did not differ significantly between the groups. No significant differences were identified in side-to-side difference on Telos stress radiographs (group A, 6.3 ± 5.0 mm; group B, 5.6 ± 3.8 mm; P = .403) and graft failure rate (group A, 33.3%; group B, 30.6%; P = .358) at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the clinical outcomes of revision ACLRs in patients improved significantly in patients younger than 40 years and were comparable to those observed in patients older than 40 years at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Within 3 Weeks Does Not Increase Stiffness and Complications Compared With Delayed Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Injury-to-surgery time has been identified as a key point in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with early versus delayed treatment remaining a debated and controversial topic in the management of ACL tears.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The aim was to quantitatively synthesize the best literature evidence by including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early versus delayed ACL reconstruction, with a clear and univocal definition of cutoffs of early or delayed surgery. The hypothesis was that early treatment would lead to similar final clinical results compared with the delayed approach while providing a faster recovery without an increase in complications after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on February 12, 2019, using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and gray literature databases. According to previous literature, 2 analyses with different cutoffs for injury-to-surgery time (3 weeks and 10 weeks) were performed to distinguish early and delayed reconstruction. The influence of timing was analyzed through meta-analyses in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), risk of complications, range of motion (ROM) limitation, risk of retears, and residual laxity. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed following the Cochrane guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight studies (5 in 3-week cutoff analysis and 3 in 10-week cutoff analysis) were included. No differences were found in terms of PROMs, risk of complications, ROM limitation, risk of retears, and residual laxity either in the 3-week cutoff analysis or in the 10-week cutoff analysis (P > .05). The level of evidence was moderate to low for the outcomes of the 3-week cutoff analysis and low to very low for the outcomes of the 10-week cutoff analysis.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis did not confirm the previously advocated benefits of delaying ACL surgery to avoid the acute posttraumatic phase. In fact, RCTs demonstrated that timing of surgery after ACL tears has no influence on the final functional outcome, risk of retears, or residual instability. While no data were available about the recovery time, literature results showed that early ACL reconstruction could be performed without increasing the risk of complications.

STUDY REGISTRATION

CRD42019119319 (PROSPERO).

Evidence too weak to guide surgical treatment decisions for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review of the risk of new meniscal tears after anterior cruciate ligament injury

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of new meniscal tears after treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, in children and adults with and without ACL reconstruction.

DESIGN

Prognosis systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42016036788).

METHODS

We searched Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PEDro and Google Scholar from inception to 3rd May 2018. Eligible articles included patients with ACL injury (diagnosis confirmed by MRI and/or diagnostic arthroscopy), reported the number of meniscal tears at the time of ACL injury diagnosis/start of treatment and reported the number of new meniscal tears that subsequently occurred. Articles with fewer than 20 patients at follow-up, and articles limited to ACL revision surgery or multi-ligament knee injuries were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened articles, assessed eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We judged the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group methodology.

RESULTS

Of 75 studies included in the systematic review, 54 studies with 9624 patients and 501 new meniscal tears were appropriate for quantitative analysis. Heterogeneity precluded data pooling. The risk of new meniscal tears was 0%-21% when follow-up was <2 years, 0%-29% when follow-up was 2 to 5 years, 5%-52% when follow-up was 5 to 10 years and 4%-31% when follow-up was longer than 10 years. The proportion of studies with high risk of selection, misclassification and detection bias was 84%, 69% and 68%, respectively. Certainty of evidence was very low.

CONCLUSION

New meniscal tears occurred in 0%-52% of patients between 4 months and 20 years (mean 4.9±4.4 years) following treatment for ACL injury. The certainty of evidence was too low to guide surgical treatment decisions. This review cannot conclude that the incidence of new meniscal tears is lower if ACL injury is treated with surgery compared with treatment with rehabilitation only.