Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial

Compressive force and valgus torque are the predominant applied loads during the pivot shift exam: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

Despite the clinical utility of the pivot shift exam, the requisite applied forces and torques to elicit a pivot shift remain unclear. The purposes of this study are (1) to identify the greatest forces and torques applied to the knee during the pivot shift exam and (2) to evaluate if the applied loads differ among experienced surgeons.

METHODS

Three cadaveric hemipelvis-to-toe specimens (ages 53, 36 and 31 years; two males and one female) with no history of knee or hip injury were utilized. The experimental setup consisted of securing the hemipelvis to a mounting frame via an external fixator to simulate patient positioning during the clinical exam. The hemipelvis, femur, and tibia were spatially tracked by motion capture and the applied loads were measured using a 6-axis force-torque sensor. After sectioning the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), three board-certified sports medicine surgeons then performed the pivot shift exam on each specimen utilizing their preferred technique. Forces (compression-distraction, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral) and torques (varus-valgus, internal-external rotation, and flexion-extension) applied to the knee joint immediately preceding the reduction of the proximal lateral tibia during each pivot shift exam were calculated.

RESULTS

Compression was the largest applied force averaging 95 N ± 15 N for all surgeons and knees, which was at least 4.5 times greater, on average, than the applied anterior and applied medial tibial forces (p < 0.0001). Valgus was the largest of the three applied torques, averaging 8.5 ± 2.1 Nm. Internal rotation torque was 3.7 times less, on average, than the applied valgus torque (p < 0.0001). Each surgeon applied compressive force. However, anterior force was more variable among surgeons, with one of the three surgeons applying minimal anterior force (p ≤ 0.024). The magnitude of applied torques was similar among examiners (n.s).

CONCLUSION

Compressive force and valgus torque were the predominant applied loads during the pivot shift exam. A lower magnitude of internal rotation torque was also applied. The anterior force was not consistently applied among examiners. These data can better inform clinical, cadaveric, and computational studies utilizing the pivot shift exam to assess knee biomechanics and can be used to educate trainees in conducting this complex manoeuvre.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

An in vitro biomechanic study.

Stress Views should be Standard of Care for all ACL Deficient Knees with Asymmetric Varus Laxity on Examination

A small degree of increased varus laxity in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disrupted knees can often be felt on initial examination. Why this occurs is not always clear and is usually felt to be related to some degree of fibular collateral ligament (FCL) injury. However, there may be another structure that demands our attention in an ACL-deficient knee with more laxity than isolated ACL injuries, but less laxity than combined ACL and FCL injuries. That structure is the anterolateral complex (ALC), including the anterolateral ligament (ALL), the iliotibial band, and quite importantly, Kaplan's fibers.

What's in a Name? Defining 'Failure' in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Graft failure, one of the most common outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction randomized controlled trials, lacks a consensus definition. The purpose of this study was to systematically summarize current practice and parameters in defining anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft 'failure'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Forty studies (4466 participants) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Of these, 90% either defined failure formally or referenced the etiology of failure, the remaining 10% used the term failure without referencing the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft. Among the included studies, there was a high level of inconsistency between the definitions of graft failure. The extracted data was categorized into broader groups, revealing abnormal knee laxity (80%) and graft re-rupture (37.5%) as the most common parameters incorporated in the definitions of graft failure in high-level randomized controlled trials. This review shows that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction randomized controlled trials lack a consistent definition for graft failure. A universal definition is vital for clarity in medical practice and research, ideally incorporating both objective (e.g. graft re-rupture) and subjective (e.g. validated questionnaires) parameters. A composite outcome should be established which includes some of the common parameters highlighted in this review. In the future, this review can be used to assist orthopaedic surgeons to establish a formal definition of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft 'failure'.

Validating the capture rate of revisions by the New Zealand ACL Registry: An analysis of all-cause reoperation following primary ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To validate the New Zealand Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Registry's capture rate of revisions by cross-referencing Registry data with reoperations data recorded by the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) and identify risk factors for all-cause reoperation.

METHODS

Primary ACL reconstructions performed between April 2014 and September 2019 were individually matched on a record-by-record basis between the two databases. The ACC database was used to identify patients who underwent a reoperation with manual review of operation notes to identify whether a revision or other procedure was performed. This was combined with the number of revisions separately recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry, which was used as the denominator value to calculate the Registry's capture rate of revisions. Patient and surgical data recorded in the Registry were analysed to identify independent predictors for all-cause reoperation.

RESULTS

A total of 8046 primary ACL reconstructions were matched between the New Zealand ACL Registry and the ACC databases. The reoperation rate was 8.9% (n = 715) at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. Meniscal-related procedures were the most common reoperation (n = 299, 3.7%), followed by revision ACL reconstruction (n = 219, 2.7%), arthrofibrosis (n = 185, 2.3%), cartilage (n = 56, 0.7%) and implants (n = 32, 0.4%). The New Zealand ACL Registry captured 96% of revisions. Younger age (hazard ratio [HR] > 1.4, p < 0.001), earlier surgery (HR > 1.3, p = 0.05), concurrent meniscal repair (medial meniscus HR = 1.9, p < 0.001 and lateral meniscus HR = 1.3, p = 0.022) and hamstring tendon autografts (HR = 1.4, p = 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of reoperation.

CONCLUSION

The New Zealand ACL Registry captured 96% of revisions. Risk factors for all-cause reoperation included younger age, earlier surgery, meniscal repair and hamstring tendon autografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Anterior Slope-Modifying Osteotomies Alter the Length Change Behavior of the Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Increased tibial slope has been shown to lead to higher rates of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure. A slope-decreasing osteotomy can reduce in situ anterior cruciate ligament force and may mitigate this risk. However, how this procedure may affect the length change behavior of the medial ligamentous structures is unknown.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of anterior slope-modifying osteotomies on the medial ligamentous structures. It was hypothesized that (1) decreasing the tibial slope would lead to shortening of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL), (2) while the fibers of the posterior oblique ligament (POL) would be unaffected.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens underwent anatomic dissection to precisely identify the medial ligamentous structures. The knees were mounted in a custom-made kinematics rig with the quadriceps muscle and iliotibial tract loaded. An anterior slope-modifying osteotomy was performed and fixed using an external fixator, which allowed modification of the wedge height between -15 and +10 mm in 5-mm increments. Threads were mounted between pins positioned at the anterior, middle, and posterior parts of the tibial and femoral attachments of the sMCL and POL. For different tibial slope modifications, length changes between the tibiofemoral pin combinations were recorded using a rotary encoder as the knee was flexed between 0° and 120°.

RESULTS

All sMCL fiber regions shortened with slope reduction (P < .001) and lengthened with slope increase (P < .001), with the anterior sMCL fibers more affected than the posterior sMCL fibers. A 15-mm anterior closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (ACWHTO) resulted in a 6.9% ± 3.0% decrease in the length of the anterior sMCL fibers compared with a 3.6% ± 2.3% decrease for the posterior sMCL fibers. A 10-mm anterior opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (AOWHTO) increased anterior sMCL fiber length by 5.9% ± 2.3% and posterior sMCL fiber length by 1.6% ± 1.0%. The POL fibers were not significantly affected by a slope-modifying osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

Tibial slope-modifying osteotomies changed the length change pattern of the sMCL such that an AOWHTO increased whereas an ACWHTO decreased the sMCL strain. This effect was most pronounced for the anterior fibers of the sMCL. The length change pattern of the POL remained unaffected by slope-modifying osteotomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should be aware that anterior tibial slope-modifying osteotomies affect the biomechanics of the sMCL. After an extensive ACWHTO, patients may develop a medial or anteromedial instability, while an AOWHTO may overconstrain the medial compartment.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis does not enhance ACL graft healing, however, does reduce graft tunnel widening

PURPOSE

The study hypothesized that the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) had a significant effect on ACL graft healing.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients were divided into two cohorts matched for gender, age, body mass index, time from surgery to post-operative MRI and graft diameter. Forty patients underwent ACL reconstruction alone, while 40 underwent ACLR in addition to LEAT. Patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan at 12 months post-surgery; tunnel apertures were measured using multiplanar reformation, graft healing was assessed using signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) in three regions of interest and finally graft maturity and integration were classified using the Howell and Ge scale, respectively. In addition, clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcome measures were collected.

RESULTS

The mean femoral tunnel widening at 12 months post-surgery was 39.8 ± 14.0% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 55.2 ± 12.7% in the ACLR alone group (p < 0.05). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 29.3 ± 12.7% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 44.4 ± 12.1% in the ACLR group (p < 0.05). The mean adjusted graft SNQ was 9.0 ± 14.9 in the ACLR + LEAT group and 9.5 ± 11.4 in the ACLR group (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

At 1 year post-operatively, we noted significantly less femoral and tibial tunnel widening in the ACLR + LEAT group. LEAT did not result in a statistically significant effect on graft healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Outcomes of combined single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and anterolateral structure reconstruction through a modified single femoral tunnel

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical outcomes of combining anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and anterolateral structure (ALS) reconstruction through a modified single femoral tunnel in patients with high risk of clinical failure.

METHODS

From December 2018 to August 2022, a total of 62 patients with ACL injury in our institution were enrolled in this study. All patients were associated with high risk of clinical failure, meeting the indications of ALS reconstruction. All patients accepted arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction and ALS reconstruction using hamstring autograft through a modified single femoral tunnel. Perioperative clinical outcome measurements consisted of functions, stability and safety evaluation at different time points (preoperative, postoperative three month, six month, one year, two year, three year and more). Functional evaluation included Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score.

RESULTS

All patients, including 47 males and 15 females, aged 16-52 years with an average age of 29.3 ± 9.2 years, were followed up for 12-58 months. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm, subjective IKDC and Tegner activity scale (93.8 ± 7.0, 88.8 ± 10.7 and 5.8 ± 1.4 respectively) were significantly higher than those before surgery (65.0 ± 20.8, 51.2 ± 21.1 and 2.3 ± 1.3 respectively)(P < 0.05). Postoperative pivot shift and Lachman test were markedly improved (P < 0.05). One patient still had grade II pivot shift, defined as clinical failure. During follow-up, no graft rupture occurred according to magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination, no lateral compartment osteoarthritis were found in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined single bundle ACL reconstruction and ALS reconstruction through a modified single femoral tunnel could significantly improve knee function and stability with low related risk in patients with high risk of failure in ACL injury.

Trends in lateral extra-articular augmentation use and surgical technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from 2016-2023, an ACL Study Group Survey

PURPOSE

To survey the ACL study group (ACLSG) members to determine the current practice patterns surrounding the use and methodology of lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), including anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) during ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the ACLSG during the 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2023 biennial meetings. Questions explored the indications and techniques when incorporating LEAPs in ACLR.

RESULTS

Analysis of survey responses found that the reported use of LEAPs in both primary and revision ACLR significantly increased between 2016 and 2023 and that surgeons were using lateral augmentation more frequently over time. Surgical techniques were stable across survey years, with most surgeons using iliotibial band (ITB) autograft attached at Gerdy's tubercle, passed under the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), and anchored proximal/posterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle.

CONCLUSION

Survey responses demonstrate that LEAPs are becoming more common among ACL surgeons in the ACL SG, with the modified Lemaire LET being the predominant technique. This aligns with recent clinical studies showing improved outcomes and reduced risk of failure in ACLR with lateral augmentation compared to ACLR alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, Expert Opinion.

Editorial Commentary: Preferred Strategies to Avoid Collision Between Tunnels for Lateral Extra-articular Procedures and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Include Outside-In Drilling, Cortical Fixation, and Use of a Single Femoral Tunnel

When performing lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, it is essential to be aware of the possibility of tunnel collision and understand strategies to avoid it. The risk of tunnel collision is high, especially if an anteromedial portal ACL femoral tunnel is drilled. Tunnel collision can be avoided by using a single femoral tunnel for both procedures, outside-in femoral tunnel drilling to place the ACL tunnel a safe distance away from the LEAP, and cortical fixation techniques. Other strategies that have been explored have included anteromedial portal drilling in low degrees of flexion, anterior angulation of LEAP tunnels, and the use of an "anterior Lemaire" position. These alternative strategies are not preferred because they are associated with an increased risk of iatrogenic injuries to important posterolateral structures, penetration of trochlea articular cartilage, and overconstraint, respectively.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using the Superficial Layer Quadriceps Tendon Graft: Surgical Technique Description

We present a technique for the combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction using the superficial layer quadriceps tendon graft. Anatomic reconstruction is achieved with outside-in femoral tunnel drilling. The femoral drill guide has an intra-articular placement at the femoral footprint of the ACL and an extra-articular placement at the femoral ALL attachment. This surgical technique does not need any special instruments and consists of 3 bone tunnels. The long length and customized superficial quadriceps tendon graft is harvested in a minimally invasive manner and allows an accessible and low-cost reconstruction of both ligaments.

Considerations for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A review of the current literature

Background

Failure rates among primary Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction range from 3.2 to 11.1 %. Recently, there has been increased focus on surgical and anatomic considerations which predispose patients to failure, including excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS), unaddressed high-grade pivot shift, and improper tunnel placement.

Methods

The purpose of this review was to provide a current summary and analysis of the literature regarding patient-related and technical factors surrounding revision ACLR, rehabilitation considerations, overall outcomes, and return to sport (RTS) for patients who undergo revision ACLR.

Results

In revision ACLR patients, those receiving autografts are 2.78 times less likely to experience a re-rupture compared to patients who receive allografts. Additionally, individuals with properly positioned tunnels and removable implants are considered strong candidates for one-stage revision procedures. Conversely, cases involving primary tunnel widening of approximately 15 mm are typically indicative of two-stage revision ACLR. These findings underscore the importance of graft selection and surgical approach in optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing revision ACLR.

Conclusion

Given the high rates of revision surgery in young, active patients who return to pivoting sports, the literature recommends strong consideration of a combined ACLR + anterolateral ligament (ALL) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure in this population. Unrecognized posterolateral corner (PLC) injury is a common cause of ACLR failure and current literature suggests concurrent operative management of high-grade PLC injuries. Excessive PTS has been identified as an independent risk factor for ACL graft failure. Consider revision ACLR with combined slope-reducing tibial osteotomy in cases of posterior tibial slope greater than 12°.

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Does Not Decrease Graft Failure in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction When Combined With Quadriceps or Patellar Tendon Grafts

PURPOSE

To compare return-to-sport (RTS) rates, graft failure rates, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) versus isolated R-ACLR.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent R-ACLR with or without a modified Lemaire LET procedure was performed. Seventy-four patients with at least 2 years of follow-up who had high-grade positive pivot-shift test findings were included. Concomitant procedures such as meniscectomy and meniscal repair were collected, along with any complications and/or graft failure. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score were collected. The ability to RTS was defined as fully, partially, or not returned.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 39 underwent isolated R-ACLR (mean age ± standard deviation, 29.2 ± 12.2 years) whereas 35 underwent an additional LET procedure (mean age, 24.6 ± 7.4 years). The mean length of follow-up in the R-ACLR group was 56.6 ± 26.5 months compared with 44.3 ± 17.6 months in the R-ACLR-LET group (P = .02) (range, 24-120 months). Patient-reported outcome measures were higher in the R-ACLR-LET group, with the KOOS Activities of Daily Living (93.5 ± 2.0 vs 97.2 ± 1.6, P = .03) and KOOS Sport (63.0 ± 3.6 vs 74.3 ± 3.8, P = .05) subdomain scores reaching the level of statistical significance. No differences were found in the other KOOS subdomain scores or the International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Failure rates were not significantly different between the groups (12.8% for R-ACLR vs 11.4% for R-ACLR-LET, P = .99). There were 13 patients (72.2%) in the R-ACLR group and 14 patients (60.8%) in the R-ACLR-LET group who did not RTS.

CONCLUSIONS

R-ACLR with additional LET showed similar failure and RTS rates to isolated R-ACLR after failed ACLR. The R-ACLR-LET group showed better functional results with significantly higher KOOS subdomain scores for activities of daily living, as well as sports and recreation. However, this study was unable to recommend the modified Lemaire LET procedure to be routinely used in R-ACLR patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Combined, Pedicled Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction - "PAAR" Technique

Despite constant development of surgical implants, instruments, and rehabilitation protocols, the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remain unpredictable, and the failure rate of isolated procedures remains unacceptably high. Several factors possibly concerning suboptimal outcomes and risk of graft rerupture have been highlighted, among which are graft healing, tunnel position, and residual rotational instability. Recent studies have suggested that addressing anterolateral complex injury and enhancing graft healing properties might improve the outcomes of surgery. We propose a simple technique of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction using pedicled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with a single femoral tunnel and no additional tibial tunnels.

In Vitro Assessment of Knee Joint Biomechanics Using a Virtual Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Understanding the biomechanical impact of injuries and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is vital for improving surgical treatments that restore normal knee function. The purpose of this study was to develop a technique that enables parametric analysis of the effect of the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in cadaver knees, by replacing its contributions with that of a specimen-specific virtual ACLR that can be enabled, disabled, or modified. Twelve ACLR reconstructed knees were mounted onto a motion simulator. In situ ACLR graft forces were measured using superposition, and these data were used to design specimen-specific virtual ACLRs that would yield the same ligament force-elongation behaviors. Tests were then repeated using the virtual ACLR in place of the real ACLR and following that in ACL deficient knee by disabling the virtual ACLR. In comparison to the ACL deficient state, the virtual ACLRs were able to restore knee stability to the same extent as real ACLRs. The average differences between the anterior tibial translation (ATT) of the virtual ACLR versus the real ACLR were +1.6 ± 0.9 mm (p = 0.4), +2.1 ± 0.4 mm (p = 0.4), and +1.0 ± 0.9 mm (p = 0.4) during Anterior drawer, Lachman and Pivot-shift tests, respectively, which is small in comparison to the full ATT range of motion (ROM) of these knees. Therefore, we conclude that a virtual ACLR can be used in place of real ACLR during biomechanical testing of cadaveric knees. This capability opens the door for future studies that can leverage parameterization of the ACLR for surgical design optimization.

Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques and Postoperative Care Among Leaders in the Field: A Survey of the Herodicus Society

Background

Despite a growing body of literature regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there remains a wide diversity in surgical technique and clinical practice across providers.

Purpose

To (1) describe current ACLR practice preferences among members of the Herodicus society and (2) determine whether these preferences are influenced by years in practice and overall surgical volume.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

A 24-question survey investigating surgeons' practices and preferred ACLR surgical techniques was sent via email to all active Herodicus Society members. Survey responses were subdivided by years of experience and overall ACLR annual case volume. Descriptive statistics were compiled and chi-square testing was utilized to determine the significance of experience and case volume on survey responses.

Results

Of the 113 invited Herodicus Society members who perform ACLR, 69 (61%) completed the survey. Respondents had a mean ± SD of 30.9 ± 9.8 years of experience in clinical practice and performed a mean of 96.0 ± 50.7 primary and 21.6 ± 16.9 revision ACLR annually. Of revision cases, 72.1% were performed using a single-stage technique. Mean frequency of graft usage by surgeon was bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (58.6%), quadriceps autograft (14.6%), hamstring tendon autograft (14.0%), and allograft (11.8%). The plurality of surgeons responded that they used anterolateral augmentation "rarely" in primary ACLR (39.1%) and "sometimes" in revision ACLR (31.9%), with the majority performing lateral extra-articular tenodesis (66.7%) rather than anterolateral ligament reconstruction (14.5%). Most surgeons would not allow a 20-year-old football player to return before 7 months after ACLR (71.0%) but highly valued return-to-sports testing to determine readiness (94.2%). Higher volume surgeons performed single-stage revision ACLR at a significantly higher rate (79.8% vs 62.9%, P = .02) and significantly differed in return-to-sports criteria, with a greater proportion relying primarily on biometric testing (P = .01).

Conclusion

The survey demonstrated that, in the Herodicus Society, a wide range of preferences exist regarding ACLR surgical technique. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is the most frequent primary ACLR graft choice. Most participants have not embraced newer techniques such as anterolateral or suture tape augmentation. Return to sports is generally not allowed before 7 months and heavily factors-in return-to-sports testing metrics, suggesting that purely time-based criteria for return to sports is not modern practice among elite sports medicine surgeons.

Editorial Commentary: Knee Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Procedures: Appropriate Study Design Is Essential for Reducing Conflicting Findings and Unnecessary Controversy in the Orthopaedic Literature

Knee lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures (LEAPs) reduce graft rupture rates when performed at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction, LEAPs are less studied and remain controversial. Many studies support combined procedures (ACL + LEAP), yet others do not. When the literature comprises small patient cohorts and short follow-up periods, conflicting results often arise. The controversy surrounding them may be unnecessarily generated by the publication of low-quality studies. Future studies should focus on adequate power; appropriate design and methodology, including matching or randomization to account for potential confounding factors; proper statistical analyses; and avoidance of spin bias.

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Most Commonly Indicated for Pivot Shift of Grade 2 or Greater and for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine the most common indications for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2000 to the present (June 2022). Studies that met the following criteria were included: patients of any age who underwent LET in addition to ACLR, studies reporting at least 1 indication for LET, and observational/randomized controlled trial study designs including prevalence of indications. Publications had to be reported in English and peer reviewed and to have originated in the United States or countries offering identical protocols and procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 463 studies were identified from the initial search, 23 of which met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Eight of the 23 studies (34.8%) used a modified Lemaire technique, seven (30.4%) used a MacIntosh modified by Arnold-Coker, and eight (34.8%) used other techniques to perform LET. A total of 2,125 patients (53% female, 47% male [3 studies did not report sex]) underwent ACLR augmented with LET. The indications along with prevalence were as follows: positive pivot shift test (grade ≥2) (19 of 23, 82.6%), revision ACLR (12 of 23, 52.2%), ligamentous laxity (11 of 23, 47.8%), general sports participation (11 of 23, 47.8%), age less than 25 years (8 of 23, 34.8%), high risk of graft failure (5 of 23, 21.7%), and positive Lachman test (4 of 23, 17.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pivot shift grade ≥2 was the most common reason orthopaedic surgeons chose to add LET to ACLR, with revision ACLR, patient age <25, and general sports participation following closely behind.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Sex specific considerations in anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the female athlete: State of the art

The increased participation of females in sports has been accompanied by an increase in the rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The literature has identified risk factors for noncontact ACL injuries in female athletes, including anatomic, hormonal, biomechanical, neuromuscular, and environmental factors. This review will provide an overview of sex-specific considerations when managing female athletes with ACL injuries. A discussion of sex-specific surgical and rehabilitative treatment strategies with the goal of optimizing return to sport after ACL reconstruction will be emphasized.

Several factors predict the achievement of the patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To summarize the predictors of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal important change (MIC) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to 5 January 2024. The authors adhered to PRISMA/R-AMSTAR guidelines, and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on statistical associations between predictive factors and PROMs were extracted. Inverse odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (reverse group comparison) were calculated when appropriate to ensure comparative consistency.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 21,235 patients (48.1% female) were included (mean age 29.3 years). Eight studies comprising 3857 patients identified predictors of PASS, including lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) (OR = 11.08, p = 0.01), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (OR range: 2.02-2.63, p ≤ 0.011), age over 30 (OR range: 1.37-2.28, p ≤ 0.02), male sex (OR range: 1.03-1.32, p ≤ 0.01) and higher pre-operative PROMs (OR range: 1.04-1.21). Eight studies comprising 18,069 patients identified negative predictors of MCID or MIC, including female sex (OR = 0.93, p = 0.034), absence of HT autografts (OR = 0.70, p < 0.0001), higher pre-operative PROMs (OR = 0.76-0.84, p ≤ 0.01), meniscectomy (OR = 0.67, p = 0.014) and collision sports (OR = 0.02-0.60, p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Higher pre-operative PROMs, age over 30, male sex, LETs and HT autografts predicted PASS achievement. Lower pre-operative PROMs, male sex, non-collision sports, and lack of meniscectomies predicted MCID/MIC achievement. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the predictors of clinically significant post-ACLR outcomes, thus improving clinical decision-making and the management of patient expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

One type of graft for reconstruction of the ACL does not suit all patients based on their characteristics and sports: a scoping review

The selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a topic of debate, taking into consideration patient characteristics, as well as the type and level of sports involvement. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate patient characteristics that might influence the selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PubMed and Scopus were searched to identify articles for inclusion. All included studies focused on one or more patient characteristics involved in the decision-making process regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft, including the hamstrings tendon (HT), patellar tendon (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Out of the 1,977 initial studies, 27 studies were included in this review. The BPTB graft seems to be the preferred choice in young patients, females, and athletes-especially those engaged in pivoting sports. The HT graft seems to be the preferred choice in less active and older patients, along with those involved in sports where knee extensors are vital. The HT graft is not preferable in patients with a small body height and graft diameter. Moreover, surgeon preferences were also of importance for graft selection. The success of a specific graft type in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is highly dependent on the patient's characteristics and type of sport. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, body height, graft diameter, and the patient's activity level should all be considered when choosing the appropriate graft type.

Risk for Revision ACLR After Primary All-Inside Quadrupled Semitendinosus Hamstring Tendon Autograft ACLR With Independent Suture Tape Augmentation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The rate of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains high in the younger and more active patient populations. Suture tape augmentation (STA) in addition to ACLR may reduce the risk for revision surgery.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes between patients who underwent primary all-inside quadrupled semitendinosus hamstring tendon autograft (QST-HTA) ACLR with and without STA. It was hypothesized that the STA cohort would demonstrate a lower incidence of subsequent revision ACLR while maintaining comparable patient-reported outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

All patients ≤40 years of age who received primary all-inside QST-HTA ACLR with and without independent STA augmentation were identified. The following validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected: visual analog scale for pain, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, and Tegner activity scale. KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were collected pre- and postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards model and nominal logistic regression analysis were used to assess additional variables associated with revision ACLR.

Results

A total of 104 patients with a mean age of <22 years were included in the final data analysis (STA: 36 patients; control: 68 patients). Significantly fewer patients in the STA group sustained a graft failure necessitating revision surgery at the final follow-up (5.6% vs 24%; relative risk, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.06-0.97]; P = .017). Four-year graft survival was significantly higher in the STA group (97.2% vs 82.4%; P = .031). All PROMs significantly improved postoperatively except for Tegner levels, which decreased in both groups compared with their preinjury levels (P < .001). Return to sports was similar in both groups with >70% of patients returning to their previous level of competition. Regression analysis demonstrated increased risk for revision ACLR in younger patients, high school athletes, and those with higher postoperative activity levels.

Conclusion

QST-HTA ACLR with STA was associated with reduced risk for revision ACLR compared with nonaugmented QST-HTA ACLR in this young patient population. Furthermore, the addition of suture tape did not appear to affect postoperative patient-reported and return-to-sports outcomes.

Insufficient Evidence for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of clinical studies to directly compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without suture tape (ST) augmentation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies directly comparing outcomes of ACLR with versus without ST augmentation with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The search terms used were anterior cruciate ligament suture tape. Patients were evaluated based on graft failure rates, return to sport (RTS), anteroposterior (AP) laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

RESULTS

Five studies (all Level III) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 246 patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation (SA group) and 282 patients undergoing ACLR without augmentation (control group). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 29.7 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 24.0 to 48.6 months. The mean body mass index ranged from 25.3 to 26.3 kg/m2 and the overall percentage of males ranged from 43.4% to 69.0%. Overall, the graft failure rate ranged from 1.0% to 25.0% in the SA group and 8.0% to 20.0% in the control group. Among the studies that reported RTS rates, the rate ranged from 69.2% to 88.9% in the SA group and 51.5% to 87.5% in the control group. Among all PROs, 2 studies found a significant difference in the Tegner score favoring the SA group. Otherwise, no significant differences were found between groups in terms of PROs. No significant differences in AP laxity were found between groups within any particular study. There was heterogeneity between studies regarding surgical techniques, postoperative rehabilitation protocols, and reported PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to suggest that patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation may experience favorable clinical outcomes compared with ACLR alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.

Less Subsequent Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Following Primary Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Suture Tape Augmentation-A Retrospective Comparative Therapeutic Trial With 5-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To investigate patient outcomes, including revision rate, following primary bone patellar-tendon bone autograft (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without suture tape augmentation (STA) in a young and active cohort.

METHODS

All eligible patients who received primary BPTB ACLR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included in this retrospective cohort study. All patients receiving STA were augmented with the same device. Patients completed the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the visual analog scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, and the Tegner activity scale. Anteroposterior knee laxity was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Posterior tibial slope, femoral tunnel angle, and tibial tunnel placement were calculated for all patients. Subsequent surgical interventions and return to sport (RTS) were obtained from each patient.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (52 BPTB ACLR with STA, 62 traditional BPTB ACLR) with a mean patient age <19 years and a mean final follow-up of ≥5 years were included. Compared with the control group, the STA group demonstrated significantly less subsequent revision ACLR (0 vs. 5, P = .036). All PROMs and KT-1000 measurements improved at final follow-up (P < .001) and were comparable between groups. There were no differences seen in either posterior tibial slope or graft tunnel placement between groups. More than 85% of the patients were able to return to the sport that led to their injury at full capacity with no differences seen in RTS rate, time to RTS, or level of competition between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional BPTB ACLR, additional STA appeared to safely and effectively lead to less subsequent revision ACLR while maintaining acceptable PROMs and objective joint laxity measurements in a young and active patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Editorial Commentary: Routine Use of Suture Tape Augmentation for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Is Not Justified

High rates of graft failure after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and the need for revision ACLR continue to be a challenge. Multiple studies demonstrate graft failure rates and the need for revision ACLR in 10% to 15% of young patients participating in pivot sporting activities. Currently, a wide range of strategies to mitigate this is problem being investigated, including extra-articular augmentation (with modified lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction) and intra-articular fixation (that aim for primary anterior cruciate ligament healing or augmentation of an ACLR with suture tape). While the early data on suture tape augmentation of primary ACLR seem optimistic, it does not justify its routine use.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair or Reconstruction With Internal Bracing, for Properly Indicated Patients, Is Safe, Biocompatible, and Biomimetic

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with internal bracing (IB)-and ACL repair with IB when indicated-reduces graft or repair failure. IB is safe and protects ligament reconstructions and repairs. The IB construct should not be misunderstood as a synthetic ligament. To be effective, suture tape must be independently secured with the knee in full extension, reflecting the terminal length of the ACL. Regardless of graft type, the graft must be cyclically tensioned independent of the IB to allow for creep, and when properly performed, this significantly increases the ultimate tensile strength of the construct and reduces graft elongation, without stress shielding. Thus, the generic term "suture augmentation" may be misleading because the successful results reported apply to the IB technique. In our experience, the failure rate after ACL reconstruction with IB is 1% at the 5-year follow-up period. Notably, these results were achieved without an additional lateral extra-articular procedure.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Soccer Players

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries to soccer players present unique challenges in sports medicine, given the sport's global prevalence and intricate injury dynamics. These injuries, especially in the youth and female demographic, have become a substantial concern in sports medicine. This review explores the epidemiology, mechanism of injury, diagnostic procedures, treatment modalities, and rehabilitation strategies related to ACL tears within the soccer community. Progress in diagnostics, treatments, and rehabilitation underscores the importance of evidence-based approaches. As soccer continues its ascent in popularity, addressing the specific risks and nuances of ACL injuries in this context remains of paramount significance.

Longitudinal Evaluation Using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for Double-Bundle Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction There are several postoperative evaluation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) is one of the most important for evaluating postoperative clinical results. However, conventional PROMs have a high risk of a ceiling effect at one and two years postoperatively and do not accurately reflect functional improvement over time. Therefore, a longitudinal evaluation using PROM with a low risk of ceiling effect is necessary. The forgotten joint score-12 (FJS) was developed for clinical evaluation after arthroplasty. It is considered an evaluation method after arthroplasty with a low risk of demonstrating a ceiling effect. However, few studies have used the FJS as an evaluation method after ACLR, particularly those tracking changes over time. This study aimed to longitudinally evaluate FJS at one and two years after ACLR. Methods This is a retrospective observational study of postoperative patients using existing data and a questionnaire-based survey. This study included patients who underwent primary double-bundle ACLR between August 2017 and August 2021. We compared the FJS, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and Lysholm knee scale (LKS) scores at one and two years post-surgery using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The ceiling effect for each PROM was calculated at one and two years post-surgery. A ceiling was defined as obtaining a perfect score in PROMs, and the risk of demonstrating a ceiling effect was the percentage of perfect scores among all cases. The risk of demonstrating a ceiling effect for each PROM was compared using the McNemar test. To identify factors influencing FJS one-year post-ACLR across all cases, multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted for the FJS.  Results Finally, 87 patients were included in this study. Fifty-six participants were women, and 31 were men, with an average age of 28.5 ± 11.8 years at the time of surgery and a BMI of 23.2 ± 3.7 kg/m2. Fifty-eight patients with meniscus injuries requiring treatment were observed. A total of 54 patients were used to compare the results at one and two years, while 87 patients were included in the multivariate analysis for FJS at one year. The median of FJS at one and two years post-surgery were 90.6 and 95.8, respectively. The FJS showed a statistically significant improvement from one to two years (p = 0.033). Question #12 in FJS showed a significant improvement from the first to the second year postoperatively (1.74 ± 1.46 vs 1.15 ± 1.25 at one year vs two years, respectively; p = 0.0016). FJS had a lower risk of demonstrating a ceiling effect than KOOS ADL at one and two years (FJS vs KOOS ADL; at first year: 20.4% and 48.1%, p < 0.001; at second year: 33.3% and 63.0%, p = 0.0013). There was no difference compared to the other PROMs. According to the multivariate linear regression analysis, predictive factors for higher FJS scores at one year post-surgery were younger age and limb symmetry index of single-leg hop test(SLH-LSI) on the affected side that was close to that of the healthy side (SLH-LSI > 0.9). Conclusions The FJS continued to improve over two years after ACLR. The FJS post-ACLR was higher in younger individuals and those with SLH-LSI of 0.9 or higher.

Overconstraint Associated With a Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Decreased by Using an Anterior Femoral Insertion Point in a Cadaveric Model

PURPOSE

To investigate tibiofemoral knee kinematics when shifting the femoral insertion point of the modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) anterior to the lateral epicondyle.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen human knee joints were tested on a test bench in the following states: (1) native, (2) anterolateral insufficient, (3) original Lemaire (oLET; insertion point: 4 mm posterior and 8 mm proximal to the epicondyle), (4) anterior Lemaire (aLET; insertion point: 5 mm anterior and 5 mm proximal to the epicondyle). Internal tibial rotation was statically investigated under an internal tibial torque of 5 Nm in 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Anterior translation was statically investigated during a simulated Lachman test with an anterior translational force of 98 N. Additionally, the range of internal tibial rotation and anterior translation were dynamically investigated by a simulated pivot-shift test. Tibiofemoral kinematics were measured using an optical 3D motion analysis system.

RESULTS

The aLET showed an internal tibial rotation comparable to the native state for all tested flexion angles except 90° (0°: P = .201; 30°: P = .118; 60°: P = .126; 90°: P = .026). The oLET showed an internal tibial rotation below the values of the native state for all tested flexion angles indicating an overconstraint (0°: P = .003; 30°: P = .009; 60°: P = .029; 90°: P = .029). Direct comparisons between aLET and oLET showed a significantly decreased overconstraint at 0° and 30° of flexion (P = .001 and P = .003, respectively) when using the aLET. No differences in anterior translation and internal tibial rotation were found between the oLET and aLET during simulated Lachman and pivot-shift test (P > .05), approximating the native state.

CONCLUSIONS

An anteriorly shifted LET insertion point restored internal tibial rotation after anterolateral insufficiency to the native state while decreasing the overconstraint of internal tibial rotation induced by an LET using the originally described insertion point for small flexion angles ≤30°.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Using an LET insertion point anterior to the epicondyle was recently reported to lower the risk of tunnel interference and has now been shown to restore internal tibial rotation effectively in vitro in the course of the present study. Concerns of overconstraining internal tibial rotation are not diminished by this technique, but using an anterior insertion point helps to decrease overconstraint.

Young men undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to those undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling

OBJECTIVE

To compare 5- to 10-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young men performed with bone-patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autograft and anteromedial portal to reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. It was hypothesised that in young adult men, at 5- to 10-year follow-up, superior restoration of knee laxity and activity levels would be demonstrated using BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal technique.

METHODS

Ninety-four men who had ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal were eligible for comparison to 106 men who had reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18-35 years, (2) ACL tear caused by sports trauma only, (3) no concomitant ligament reconstruction and (4) 5- to 10-year follow-up. Outcome measures compared between the two groups included Lachman and pivot shift tests, KT side-to-side difference, Tegner and Marx scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)-subjective score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS), Short Form (SF)-36, and single hop test for distance. P value ​< ​0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with BPTB and 55 patients with hamstring ACL reconstruction were available for in-person assessment at 5-10 years after surgery. Outcomes in the BPTB group compared to the hamstring group showed KT difference 1.4 ​± ​1.9 mm vs. 2.8 ​± ​2.3 mm (p ​< ​0.01), pivot shift grade 2-3 in 4% vs. 34% (p ​< ​0.01), return to preinjury Tegner level in 51% vs. 36% (p ​= 0.1) and to preinjury Marx score in 29% vs. 11% (p ​= 0.02), and IKDC-subjective 88 ​± ​10 vs. 82 ​± ​13 vs (p ​< ​0.01), respectively. Statistically significant inter-relationships were found between KT side-to-side difference and the Tegner, Marx and IKDC-subjective scores at follow-up (r ​= ​-0.314, p ​< ​0.01; r ​= ​-0.263, p ​< ​0.01; r ​= ​-0.218, p ​= ​0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Young men undergoing ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to young men undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study).

Secondary restraints in ACL reconstruction: State-of-the-art

At-risk patients continue to experience a high likelihood of graft rupture after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). This narrative review seeks to provide the reader with an evidence-based synopsis of state-of-the-art concepts related to secondary restraint lesions, and how addressing them surgically might result in improved outcomes of ACLR.

The presence of a deep lateral femoral notch sign in ACL-injured patients is associated with a 2.7° steeper posterior tibial slope and a 19% higher frequency of lateral meniscal injuries

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to study the relationship between the presence of a deep lateral femoral notch sign (DLFNS) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients and a higher posterior lateral tibial slope (LPTS), a reduced meniscal bone angle (MBA), a higher LPTS/MBA ratio and a higher incidence of concomitant injuries in primary ACL tears.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed in patients submitted to primary ACL reconstruction with an available preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Patients with ACL tears and a femoral impactation with a depth ≥2 mm were assorted to the DLFNS group and patients with ACL tear and without a DLFNS to the control group. LPTS and MBA were measured in MRI. The presence of concomitant injuries (meniscal, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament and bone injuries) was assessed in MRI. Quantitative data are presented in the median ± interquartile range (IQR).

RESULTS

There were 206 patients included in the study, with 46 patients assorted to the DLFNS group and 160 patients to the control group. In the DLFNS group, the median LPTS was 6.7° (IQR: 4.0-8.2) versus 4.0° in the control group (IQR: 2.2-6.5) (p = 0.003). The LPTS/MBA ratio was significantly higher in the DLFNS group, with a median of 0.32 (IQR: 0.19-0.44), in comparison to the control group, with a median of 0.19 (IQR: 0.11-0.31) (p < 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the LPTS is an independent risk factor to having a DLFNS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.161; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.042-1.293, p = 0.007). There was a higher incidence of concomitant lateral meniscal injuries in the DLFNS group (67% vs. 48%, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACL tears, the presence of a DLFNS is associated with a steeper lateral posterior tibial slope, as well as a higher incidence of concomitant lateral meniscal injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Higher contact pressure of the lateral tibiofemoral joint in lateral extra-articular tenodesis with tensioned graft in external rotation than in neutral rotation: A biomechanical study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the mean contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and mean contact area of the lateral tibiofemoral joint in lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with tension on the graft in tibial neutral and external rotation.

METHODS

A total of eight Thiel-embalmed cadaveric knees were prepared and divided into two groups (4 knees in each group): the LET-NR group (lateral extra-articular tenodesis tension in neutral rotation) and (2) the LET-ER group (lateral extra-articular tenodesis tension in external rotation). Each knee was prepared according to the corresponding technique. A hydraulic testing system (E10000, Instron) simulates an axial load of 735 ​N for 10 ​s in each group.

RESULTS

The LET-ER group exhibited a statistically significant higher peak contact pressure compared to the LET-NR group. The peak contact pressure values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 702.3 ​± ​233.9 ​kPa and 1235.5 ​± ​171.4 ​kPa, respectively (p ​= ​0.010, 95% CI, -888.0 to -178.5). The mean contact pressure values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 344.9 ​± ​69.0 ​kPa and 355.3 ​± ​34.9 ​kPa, respectively (p ​= ​0.796, 95% CI, -105.1-84.2). The mean contact area values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 36.8 ​± ​3.1 mm2 and 33.3 ​± ​6.4 mm2, respectively (p ​= ​0.360, 95% CI, -5.2-12.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The peak contact pressure of the lateral tibiofemoral joint is greater in LET when the graft is tensioned in external rotation than in neutral rotation. However, no statistically significant difference in the mean contact pressure or the mean contact area was observed between the two groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effect of Preoperative Anterolateral Ligament Injury on Outcomes After Isolated Acute ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Graft: A Prospective Study With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The potential influence of a preoperative anterolateral ligament (ALL) lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the mid- and long-term surgical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still controversial.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of isolated ACL reconstruction at a minimum 5-year follow-up in patients with and without ALL injury diagnosed preoperatively using MRI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients with acute ACL injury was divided into 2 groups based on the presence (ALL injury group) or absence (control group) of ALL injury on preoperative MRI. This is a longer-term follow-up study of a previously published study that had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Both groups underwent anatomic isolated reconstruction of the ACL. The Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift tests, reconstruction failure rate, incidence of contralateral ACL injury, presence of associated meniscal injury, and presence of knee hyperextension were evaluated. The evaluation at the 5-year follow-up was also compared with the same patient's evaluation at 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were evaluated. No significant differences were found between the groups in the preoperative evaluation. In the postoperative evaluation, patients in the ALL injury group had a higher reconstruction failure rate (14.3% vs 4.6% for the control group; P = .049) and worse clinical outcomes according to the Lysholm scores (85.0 ± 10.3 vs 92.3 ± 6.6; P < .00001). Although the pivot-shift test results were similar, anteroposterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed worse results for the ALL injury group (2.8 ± 1.4 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.3 mm; P = .00018). Patients in the ALL injury group also had an increase in KT-1000 arthrometer values from 2 to 5 years (2.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.8 ± 1.4; P = .038). Patients in the control group had no differences in outcomes from 2 to 5 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Combined ACL and ALL injuries were associated with significantly less favorable outcomes than were isolated ACL injuries at a minimum follow-up of 5 years after isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients with concomitant ALL injury showed a higher failure rate and worse functional scores. Also, knee stability tended to slightly worsen from 2 to 5 years in cases of associated ALL injury.

Ensemble Algorithm for Risk Prediction of Clinical Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Patient-specific risk profiles of clinical failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are meaningful for preoperative surgical planning and postoperative rehabilitation guidance.

Purpose

To create an ensemble algorithm machine learning (ML) model and ML-based web-based tool that can predict the patient-specific risk of clinical failure after ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 432 patients (mean age, 26.8 ± 8.4 years; 74.1% male) who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft between January 2010 and February 2019. The primary outcome was the probability of clinical failure at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The authors included 24 independent variables for feature selection and model development. The data set was split randomly into training sets (75%) and test sets (25%). Models were built using 4 ML algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, random forest, light gradient boosting machine, and adaptive boosting. In addition, a weighted-average voting (WAV) ensemble model was constructed using the ensemble-voting technique to predict clinical failure after ACLR. Concordance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]), calibration, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate predictive performances of the 5 models.

Results

Clinical failure occurred in 73 of the 432 patients (16.9%). The 8 most important predictors for clinical failure were follow-up period, high-grade preoperative knee laxity, time from injury to ACLR, participation in competitive sports, posterior tibial slope, graft diameter, age at surgery, and medial meniscus resection. The WAV ensemble algorithm achieved the best predictive performance based on concordance (AUC, 0.9139), calibration (calibration intercept, -0.1806; calibration slope, 1.2794; Brier score, 0.0888), and decision curve analysis (greatest net benefits) and was used to develop an web-based application to predict a patient's clinical failure risk of ACLR.

Conclusion

The WAV ensemble algorithm was able to accurately predict patient-specific risk of clinical failure after ACLR. Clinicians and patients can use the web-based application during preoperative consultation to understand individual prediction outcomes.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis may be more cost-effective than independent anterolateral ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and economic analysis

IMPORTANCE

Anterolateral augmentation during primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may lower rates of ACL graft failure. However, differences in costs between two techniques, lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis comparing LET versus ALLR in the setting of primary ACLR. The hypothesis was that LET is more cost-effective than ALLR.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic review was conducted on studies in which patients underwent primary ACLR with a concomitant LET or ALLR with minimum 24 months follow-up published between January 2013 and July 2023. Primary outcomes included ACL graft failure rates and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL) subscale scores, which were used to determine health utilities measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. A decision tree model with one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses compared the cost of primary ACLR with a concomitant LET, independent autograft ALLR, or independent allograft ALLR. Costs were estimated using a combination of QALYs, institution prices, literature references, and a survey sent to 49 internationally recognized high-volume knee surgeons.

FINDINGS

A total of 2505 knees undergoing primary ACLR with concomitant LET (n=1162) or ALLR (n=1343) were identified from 22 studies. There were 77 total ACL graft failures with comparable failure rates between patients receiving LET versus ALLR (2.9% vs. 3.2%, P=0.690). The average QALYs gained was slightly higher for those who received LET (0.77) compared to ALLR (0.75). Survey results revealed a 5 minute longer median self-reported operative time for ALLR (20 ​min) than LET (15 ​min). The estimated costs for LET, autograft ALLR, and allograft ALLR were $1,015, $1,295, and $3,068, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Anterolateral augmentation during primary ACLR with LET is more cost-effective than independent autograft and allograft ALLR given the lower costs and comparable clinical outcomes. Surgeons may utilize this information when determining the optimal approach to anterolateral augmentation during primary ACLR, although differences in preferred technique and health care systems may influence operative efficiency and material costs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review; Level of evidence, IV.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in association to All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not modify return to play in basketball players: A comparative cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Return to play rates after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction range between 50-98% depending on sport professionality, without being modified by the addition of an extra-articular augmentation (EA). The objective of the study is to describe the rate of return to play in our cohort. The hypothesis is that the addition of EA increases that rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study of a 130 basketball players cohort between 18 and 45 years old, whom underwent ACL reconstruction between the years 2018 and 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Data was collected by reviewing medical records. IKDC score was registered after one year from surgery. All patients operated from 2020 received an extra-articular tenodesis.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 72.31% returned to training, 70.77% returned to competition and 46.15% returned to the same level of performance prior to injury. The EA group (46.15%) did not increase the rate of return to competition (P=.552) nor to the same level of performance (P=.664). The mean IKDC. score was 86.83 (SD 14.85), and was not higher in the EA group (P=.418). However, its value was higher in the players who returned to training, competition and level of performance (P<.05). EA did not delay the return to play in any group (P=.282).

CONCLUSION

To sum up, the EA does not modify the return to sport rate. Higher IKDC values predict a greater return to sport rate. in all groups. Prospective studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up time are required.

No increased complication rate with the use of soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The autograft of choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains debateable. Recently there has been increased popularity of soft tissue quadriceps tendon (s-QT) autograft due to less donor site morbidity, reduced anterior knee pain and comparable re-operation and complication rates. The aim of this review was to analyse functional outcomes of primary ACLR using s-QT in adult population without the bone plug and to report its complication profile against other autografts.

PATIENT AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a review of literature was conducted on four online databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar). Clinical studies reporting on patients undergoing primary ACLR with s-QT autograft or in comparison to BPTB or HS autografts with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. The studies were inclusive of only all soft tissue QT autograft regardless of the implants or fixation method used. Critical appraisal of studies was conducted using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were eligible. There were three randomised control studies (RCT) and 11 non-randomised comparative studies with 1543 patients who underwent ACLR. 682 underwent s-QT, 498 had hamstring tendon (HT) and 174 had bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). 60% (n = 930) were males and mean follow up was 23.6 months (6-65). Eight studies reported post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 91.5 ± 15.1 whereas mean Lysholm score was 90 ± 3.9. Five studies reported on laxity with mean anterior tibial translation (ATT) of 1.28 ± 1.09 mm. Overall complication rate of s-QT ACLR was 6% with 3% graft failure, 0.52% arthrofibrosis, 0.2% infection, 0.75% revision ACLR. There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores, knee stability and range of motion (ROM) between s-QT, HT and BPTB.

CONCLUSION

s-QT for ACLR has a comparable functional outcome, laxity, failure and with overall graft failure rate of 3%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair revision rates are increased in skeletally mature patients under the age of 21 compared to reconstruction, while adults (>21 years) show no significant difference: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of age as a risk factor on the revision rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR), dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) and bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) compared to ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for comparative studies comparing outcomes for ACLPR, DIS or BEAR to ACLR. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to assess nondifferentiated and age-differentiated (skeletally mature patients ≤21 and >21 years) ACL revision and reoperation risk, as well as results for subjective outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool 2.0c and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies tools.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies (n = 1277) were included. ACLR demonstrated a lower nonage-stratified revision risk at 2 years versus ACLPR, DIS and BEAR, but a similar revision risk at 5 years when compared to DIS. However, an age-stratified analysis demonstrated a significantly increased ACLPR revision risk as compared to ACLR in skeletally mature patients ≤21 years of age (risk ratios [RR], 6.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-33.87, p = 0.03), while adults (>21 years) showed no significant difference between groups (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.25-8.91, n.s.). Furthermore, DIS reoperation rates were significantly higher than respective ACLR rates (RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.35-3.65, p = 0.002), whereas BEAR (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.41-2.75, n.s.) and ACLPR (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.21-3.09, n.s.) showed no differences. IKDC scores were equivalent for all techniques. However, ACLPR exhibited significantly better FJS (mean difference, 11.93; 95% CI, 6.36-17.51, p < 0.0001) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Symptoms (mean difference, 3.01; 95% CI, 0.42-5.60, p = 0.02), along with a lower Tegner activity reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

ACLPR in skeletally mature patients ≤21 years of age is associated with up to a six-fold risk increase for ACL revision surgery compared to ACLR; however, adults (>21 years) present no significant difference. Based on the current data, age emerges as a crucial risk factor and should be considered when deciding on the appropriate treatment option in proximal ACL tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Femoral Tunnel Position in Anatomical Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction is not Affected by Blumensaat's Line Morphology

The aim of this study was to reveal the influence of the morphological variations of the Blumensaat's line on anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel position in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Fifty-three subjects undergoing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included (29 female, 24 male; median age 27.4 years; range: 14-50 years). Using an inside-out transportal technique, the PL tunnel position was made on a line drawn vertically from the bottommost point of the lateral condyle at 90 degrees of knee flexion, spanning a distance of 5 to 8 mm, to the edge of the joint cartilage. AM tunnel position was made 2 mm distal to the PL tunnel position. Following Iriuchishima's classification, the morphology of the Blumensaat's line was classified into straight and hill (large and small) types. Femoral tunnel position was determined using the quadrant method. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare straight and hill type knees according to AM and PL femoral tunnel position.There were 18 straight and 35 hill type knees (13 small and 22 large hill). AM and PL femoral tunnel position in straight type knees were 21.7 ± 7.0 and 33.6 ± 10.5% in the shallow-deep direction, and 42.1 ± 11.1 and 72.1 ± 8.5% in the high-low direction, respectively. In hill type knees, AM and PL femoral tunnel position were 21.3 ± 5.8 and 36.9 ± 7.1% in the shallow-deep direction, and 44.6 ± 10.7 and 72.1 ± 9.7% in the high-low direction, respectively. No significant difference in AM or PL femoral tunnel position was detected between straight and hill type knees.AM and PL femoral tunnel position in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction was not affected by the morphological variations of the Blumensaat's line. Surgeons do not need to consider Blumensaat's line morphology if AM and PL femoral tunnel position is targeted at the bottommost point of the lateral condyle. This was a level of evidence III study.

An Update on Emerging Techniques and Considerations in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

» The rate of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure in at-risk populations remains unacceptably high and necessitates thorough evaluation of native alignment and concomitant injuries.» Posterior tibial slope of >12° is a substantial risk factor of ACLR failure and should be corrected through anterior closing wedge osteotomy.» Varus malalignment of >5° exacerbates stress on the ACL graft, increases ACLR failure risks, and should be considered for correction through high tibial osteotomy at the time of revision ACLR.» Injuries to the anterolateral ligamentous complex are prevalent in ACL ruptures, and high-risk patients have shown benefit from anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis in the revision setting.» Addressing posterolateral corner, collateral ligament, and meniscal injuries, during revision ACLR, is vital to mitigate increased graft forces and optimize knee stability and functional outcomes.

Surgical Techniques in Primary ACL Reconstruction: Getting It Right the First Time

The ideal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is an individualized anatomic approach aimed at restoring the native structure and function of the knee. Surgeons are tasked with difficult decisions during operative planning, including the optimal graft choice for the patient and appropriate anatomic tunnel placement. Special considerations should additionally be given for skeletally immature patients and those at high-risk for failure, including younger, active patients participating in pivoting sports. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the individualized approach to ACLR, including the necessary preoperative and operative considerations to optimize patient outcomes.

Load Sharing of the Deep and Superficial Medial Collateral Ligaments, the Effect of a Partial Superficial Medial Collateral Injury, and Implications on ACL Load

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) and partial superficial MCL (psMCL) can cause anteromedial rotatory instability; however, the contribution of each these injuries in restraining anteromedial rotatory instability and the effect on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) load remain unknown.

PURPOSE

To investigate the contributions of the different MCL structures in restraining tibiofemoral motion and to evaluate the load through the ACL after MCL injury, especially after combined dMCL/psMCL injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator. Tibiofemoral kinematic parameters were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8-N·m valgus rotation, 4-N·m external tibial rotation (ER), 4-N·m internal tibial rotation, and a combined 89-N anterior tibial translation and 4-N·m ER for both anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation (AMT). The kinematic parameters of the 3 different MCL injuries (dMCL; dMCL/psMCL; dMCL/superficial MCL (sMCL)) were recorded and reapplied either in an ACL-deficient joint (load sharing) or before and after cutting the ACL (ACL load). The loads were calculated by applying the principle of superposition.

RESULTS

The dMCL had the largest effect on reducing the force/torque during ER, AMR, and AMT in extension and the psMCL injury at 30° to 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). In a comparison of the load through the ACL when the MCL was intact, the ACL load increased by 46% and 127% after dMCL injury and combined dMCL/psMCL injury, respectively, at 30° of knee flexion during ER. In valgus rotation, a significant increase in ACL load was seen only at 90° of knee flexion.

CONCLUSION

The psMCL injury made the largest contribution to the reduction of net force/torque during AMR/AMT at 30° to 90° of flexion. Concomitant dMCL/psMCL injury increased the ACL load, mainly during ER.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

If a surgical procedure is being considered to treat anteromedial rotatory instability, then the procedure should focus on restoring sMCL function, as injury to this structure causes a major loss of the knee joint's capacity to restrain AMR/AMT.

Evaluation of Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: What We Know, What We Have, and What to Consider

Measurement of success following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) hinges on the appropriate use of high quality and meaningful outcome measures. We identified and categorized over 100 outcome measures for ACLR using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. The ICF model is a useful framework to facilitate decisions about outcome selection and describe recovery following ACL injury. We outline key considerations when selecting outcome measures during study design (purpose, measurement properties, sample size, global assessment) or evaluating reported outcomes (measurement properties, sample size, magnitude/precision, clinical relevance, applicability), and discuss challenges in outcome measurement following ACLR.

Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Skeletally Immature Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anterior cruciate ligament (ALC) tears are increasingly common in skeletally immature patients, as more children and adolescents participate in intensive sports training and specialization at increasingly younger ages. These injuries were historically treated nonoperatively, given concerns for physeal damage and subsequent growth disturbances after traditional ACL reconstruction techniques. However, there is now sufficient data to suggest superior outcomes with operative treatment, specifically with physeal-sparing and physeal-respecting techniques. This article reviews considerations of skeletal maturity in patients with ACL tears, then discusses surgical techniques, with a focus on their unique indications and outcomes. Additional surgical adjuncts and components of postoperative rehabilitation, which may reduce retear rates, are also considered.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows favorable patient-reported outcomes and high return-to-sport rates after ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Graft rupture (ACL retear) rates are low, but notably higher than in most adult populations. Historically, there has been insufficient research to comprehensively compare reconstruction techniques used in this patient population. However, thoughtful systematic reviews and multicenter prospective studies are emerging to address this deficit. Also, more recent data suggests the addition of lateral extra-articular procedures and stringent return-to-sports testing may lower retear rates. Physeal-sparing and physeal-respecting ACL reconstructions result in stabilization of the knee, while respecting the growth remaining in children or skeletally immature adolescents. Future research will be essential to compare these techniques, given that more than one may be appropriate for patients of a specific age and skeletal maturity.

Double-Bundle Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Anteromedial Rotatory Instability

BACKGROUND

New techniques have been proposed to better address anteromedial rotatory instability in a medial collateral ligament (MCL)-injured knee that require an extra graft and more surgical implants, which might not be feasible in every clinical setting.

PURPOSE

To investigate if improved resistance to anteromedial rotatory instability can be achieved by using a single-graft, double-bundle (DB) MCL reconstruction with a proximal fixation more anteriorly on the tibia, in comparison with the gold standard single-bundle (SB) MCL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator in intact knee, superficial MCL/deep MCL-deficient, and reconstruction states. Three different reconstructions were tested: DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation and DB and SB MCL reconstruction with proximal tibial fixation. Knee kinematics were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8 N·m of valgus rotation (VR), 5 N·m of external tibial rotation, 5 N·m of internal tibial rotation, combined 89 N of anterior tibial translation and 5 N·m of external rotation for anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation (AMT). The differences between each state for every measurement were analyzed with VR and AMR/AMT as primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Cutting the superficial MCL/deep MCL increased VR and AMR/AMT in all knee positions except at 90° for VR (P < .05). All reconstructions restored VR to the intact state except at 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). The DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics in any knee position (P < .05). Adding an anterior-based proximal tibial fixation restored intact AMR/AMT kinematics at ≥30° of knee flexion except at 90° for AMT (P < .05). The SB MCL reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics at 0° and 90° of knee flexion (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

In this in vitro cadaveric study, a DB MCL reconstruction with anteriorly placed proximal tibial fixation was able to control AMR and AMT better than the gold standard SB MCL reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In patients with anteromedial rotatory instability and valgus instability, a DB MCL reconstruction may be superior to the SB MCL reconstruction, without causing extra surgical morbidity or additional costs.

Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Anterolateral Procedures

The treatment of rotational instability has been an intriguing challenge since the era of modern anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. Lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) have emerged as a solution to this problem, particularly in high-risk populations. Several studies have shown significant benefits of combining LEAPs with ACL reconstruction, including reduced graft failure rates, improved knee stability, improved rotational stability, and higher return-to-play rates. These findings have led to an in-depth evaluation of LEAPs as lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterolateral ligament reconstruction and their potential role in improving outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

This narrative review examines the current literature for the influence of the surgical timing in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on various outcomes. Although the exact definition of early and delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a subject of controversy, surgical timing influences arthrofibrosis and postoperative stiffness, quadriceps strength, postoperative knee function, and the incidence of intra-articular injuries to the menisci and cartilage. Additionally, there is a shortage of evidence regarding the role of ACLR timing in the setting of multiligament knee injury and when concurrent procedures are performed during the operative treatment of the ACL-injured knee.

Avoiding Graft Failure: Lessons Learned from the Stability Trial

The Stability Study was a multicenter, pragmatic, parallel groups, randomized clinical trial comparing hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis in young patients at high risk of graft failure. Having recruited 618 patients with a 5% loss to follow up, we were able to demonstrate a clinically and statistically significant reduction in clinical failure and graft rupture at 2 years postoperative. No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were demonstrated between groups; however, patients who experienced an adverse event had significantly worse PROs than those who did not.

Research priorities of members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee

Aims

This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology.

Methods

Initial research questions were generated using an online survey sent to all 680 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). Duplicates were removed and a longlist was generated from this scoping exercise by a panel of 13 experts from across the UK who provided oversight of the process. A modified Delphi process was used to refine the questions and determine a final list. To rank the final list of questions, each question was scored between one (low importance) and ten (high importance) in order to produce the final list.

Results

This consensus exercise took place between December 2020 and April 2022. A total of 286 clinicians from the BASK membership provided input for the initial scoping exercise, which generated a list of 105 distinct research questions. Following review and prioritization, a longlist of 51 questions was sent out for two rounds of the Delphi process. A total of 42 clinicians responded to the first round and 24 responded to the second round. A final list of 24 research questions was then ranked by 36 clinicians. The topics included arthroplasty, infection, meniscus, osteotomy, patellofemoral, cartilage, and ligament pathologies. The management of early osteoarthritis was the highest-ranking question.

Conclusion

A Delphi exercise involving the BASK membership has identified the future research priorities in knee surgery. This list of questions will allow clinicians, researchers, and funders to collaborate in order to deliver high-quality research in knee surgery and further advance the care provided to patients with knee pathology.