1
|
Pill SG, Rogozinski Z, Bohon H, Arrambide EB, Welch GE, Carroll JM, Lutz A, Shanley E, Thigpen CA, Tolan SJ, Wyland DJ, Kissenberth MJ. No clinical difference in outcomes between inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques during rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:S31-S36. [PMID: 38527622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (ABT) are common procedures performed during rotator cuff repair. The inlay method involves creating a bone socket in the bicipital groove to secure the long head of the biceps tendon using an interference screw. The onlay method utilizes a suture anchor to secure the long head of the biceps tendon on the surface of the bicipital groove. Little is known on the long-term differences in patient-reported outcomes between these 2 techniques. The primary purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes of inlay vs. onlay ABT with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of rotator cuff tear size on outcomes and compare rates of complications between the 2 techniques. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who had an ABT during a full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Any symptom specific to the biceps were noted, including pain and cramping, Popeye deformity, or revision surgery. Complication rates were compared between groups. The visual analog scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Veteran's RAND-12 score (VR-12) scores were compared at 2 years. The impact of rotator cuff tear size was analyzed by categorizing into small/medium or large/massive based on operative reports and arthroscopic images. RESULTS There were 165 patients identified (106 in the inlay group and 59 in the onlay group). No revision surgeries were performed secondary to the biceps tendon in either group. Eleven patients (10%) in the inlay group complained of biceps pain or cramping compared to 2 patients (3%) in the onlay group (P = .11). One Popeye deformity was noted in each group (P = .67). No significant differences were found between groups for visual analog scale (P = .41), ASES functional (P = .61), ASES index (P = .91), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (P = .09), VR-12 Physical Component Score (P = .77), or VR-12 Mental Component Score (P = .09). Rotator cuff tear size within the groups also did not demonstrate statistical significance. CONCLUSION No clinical differences or complications were found at minimum 2-year follow-up between inlay and onlay ABT in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair when controlling for tear size. The clinical relevance suggests either technique is effective and can be based on surgeon preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan G Pill
- Prisma Health, Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA.
| | - Zachary Rogozinski
- Prisma Health, Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Hunter Bohon
- University of South Carolina-Greenville School of Medicine, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Adam Lutz
- ATI Physical Therapy, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | | | - Stefan J Tolan
- Prisma Health, Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Douglas J Wyland
- Prisma Health, Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang H, Huddleston HP, Kurtzman JS, Gedailovich S, Deegan L, Aibinder WR. Subpectoral proximal humeral anatomy: Guidance to decrease risk of fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:647-652. [PMID: 37981963 PMCID: PMC10656969 DOI: 10.1177/17585732231159392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Biceps tenodesis is used for a variety of shoulder and biceps pathologies. Humeral fracture is a significant complication of this procedure. This cadaveric anatomy study sought to determine the cortical thickness of the humeral proximal shaft to identify the optimal technique to decrease unicortical drilling and reduce the risk of fracture. Methods A computed tomography (CT) of eight cadaveric humeral specimens was obtained with a metallic marker placed at the site of subpectoral tenodesis. These scans were examined to define the cortical thickness of the subpectoral region of the humerus and determine angular safe zones for reaming. Results At the standard point of a subpectoral tenodesis, a mean angle relative to the coronal plane of 29.2° medially and 21.6° laterally from the deepest portion of the bicipital groove avoided unicortical drilling with a 7 mm reamer. These values varied slightly 1 cm proximal and distal to this level. The thickest regions of cortex in the subpectoral humerus correspond to the ridges of the bicipital groove. Discussion To avoid unicortical tunnels, surgeons should limit deviation from the perpendicular approach to no more than 23° relative to the coronal plane medially and 11° relative to the coronal plane laterally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanbin Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Hailey P Huddleston
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Joey S Kurtzman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Samuel Gedailovich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Liam Deegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - William R Aibinder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Light JJ, du Plessis W, Adsit MH, Eckstrom AT, Firoved AB, Griffin JW, Bonner KF. Mild Biceps Tendonitis May Be Managed Nonoperatively During Shoulder Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2023; 5:100785. [PMID: 37753186 PMCID: PMC10518440 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purposes of this study were to determine whether patients with mild biceps tendonitis required revision surgery after the biceps tendon was not surgically treated, while addressing concomitant pathology, and to evaluate whether preoperative groove pain affected patient-reported outcomes. Methods Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between 2015 and 2018 by a single surgeon for rotator cuff pathology, debridement, and distal clavicular excision (DCE), with or without subacromial decompression (SAD), and where the biceps tendon was not surgically addressed were retrospectively identified. Inclusion criteria were mild LS (<50% hyperemic appearing biceps tendon arthroscopically), and a minimum 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, simple shoulder test (SST), pain level, and satisfaction scores. Two sample t-tests compared postoperative patient-reported outcomes based on the presence or absence of preoperative bicipital groove tenderness. Results Sixty-four of 69 eligible subjects (93%) were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. One out of 64 subjects underwent revision to perform a biceps tenodesis. Overall, patients had high patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively. Ninety-seven percent of patients reported they would have the surgery again. The presence of preoperative bicipital groove tenderness had no effect on ASES (P = .62), SST (P = .83) scores, and postoperative pain (P = .65). Patients without bicipital groove pain had average respective ASES and SST scores of 93.70 ± 11.84 and 10.66 ± 2.47; those with bicipital groove pain averaged 92.00 ± 15.31 and 10.78 ± 1.87. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction scores between patients with groove pain (9.42 ± 1.40) and those without (9.46 ± 1.38; P = .92). Conclusions Patients with mild biceps tendonitis showed favorable outcomes with low revision rates and high patient satisfaction when the biceps tendon was not surgically addressed when the primary shoulder pathology was treated during arthroscopy, independent of preoperative groove pain. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wihan du Plessis
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A
- Ohio Health-Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Matthew H. Adsit
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, U.S.A
| | | | - Amanda B. Firoved
- Jordan-Young Institute for Orthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Virginia Beach, Virginia, U.S.A
| | - Justin W. Griffin
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A
- Jordan-Young Institute for Orthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Virginia Beach, Virginia, U.S.A
| | - Kevin F. Bonner
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A
- Jordan-Young Institute for Orthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Virginia Beach, Virginia, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hagan DP, Hao KA, King JJ, Srinivasan RC, Wright TW, Moser MW, Farmer KW, Wright JO, Pazik M, Roach RP. Outcomes of Biceps Tenodesis Variations With Concomitant Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter Database Analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231180173. [PMID: 37359975 PMCID: PMC10288396 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231180173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Studies to date comparing biceps tenodesis methods in the setting of concomitant rotator cuff repair (RCR) have demonstrated relatively equivalent pain and functional outcomes. Purpose To compare biceps tenodesis constructs, locations, and techniques in patients who underwent RCR using a large multicenter database. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A global outcome database was queried for patients with medium- and large-sized tears who underwent biceps tenodesis with RCR between 2015 and 2021. Patients ≥18 years of age with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, visual analog scale for pain, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) scores were compared at 1 and 2 years of follow-up based on construct (anchor, screw, or suture), location (subpectoral, suprapectoral, or top of groove), and technique (inlay or onlay). Nonparametric hypothesis testing was used to compare continuous outcomes at each time point. The proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at the 1- and 2-year follow-ups were compared between groups using chi-square tests. Results A total of 1903 unique shoulder entries were analyzed. Improvement in VR-12 Mental score favored anchor and suture fixations at 1 year of follow-up (P = .042) and the onlay tenodesis technique at 2 years of follow-up (P = .029). No additional tenodesis comparisons demonstrated statistical significance. The proportion of patients with improvement exceeding the MCID did not differ based on tenodesis methods for any outcome score assessed at the 1- or 2-year follow-up. Conclusion Biceps tenodesis with concomitant RCR led to improved outcomes regardless of tenodesis fixation construct, location, or technique. A clear optimal tenodesis method with RCR remains to be determined. Surgeon preference and experience with various tenodesis methods as well as patient clinical presentation should continue to guide surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Hagan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kevin A Hao
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ramesh C Srinivasan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael W Moser
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kevin W Farmer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jonathan O Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Marissa Pazik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ryan P Roach
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guerra JJ, Curran GC, Guerra LM. Subpectoral, Suprapectoral, and Top-of-Groove Biceps Tenodesis Procedures Lead to Similar Good Clinical Outcomes: Comparison of Biceps Tenodesis Procedures. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2023; 5:e663-e670. [PMID: 37388890 PMCID: PMC10300542 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether there is a difference in clinical results among open subpectoral (SB), arthroscopic low-in-groove suprapectoral (SP), and arthroscopic top-of-groove (TOG) locations in terms of patient-reported outcome measures for biceps tenodesis (BT) procedures using a global, self-reporting registry. Methods We identified patients who underwent BT surgery in the Surgical Outcomes System registry. The inclusion criteria were isolated primary surgical procedures for BT, excluding patients with rotator cuff and labral repairs. Additional search requirements included repair location and 100% compliance with pretreatment and 2-year follow-up surveys. This study measured clinical outcomes comparing the 3 aforementioned techniques using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score before treatment and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. In addition, postoperative VAS pain scores were collected at 2 and 6 weeks. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis test) and the Wilcoxon test. Results A total of 1,923 patients from the Surgical Outcomes System registry qualified for the study; of these, 879 underwent the SB technique, 354 underwent the SP technique, and 690 underwent the TOG technique. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic characteristics among the groups except that the TOG group was older: 60.76 years versus 54.56 years in the SB group and 54.90 years in the SP group (P < .001). In all groups, the ASES score statistically improved from before treatment (mean, 49.29 ± 0.63) to 2 years postoperatively (mean, 86.82 ± 0.80; P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups in the VAS, ASES, and SANE scores at all time points (P > .12) except for the VAS score at 1 year (P = .032) and the ASES score at 3 months (P = .0159). At 1 year, the mean VAS score in the SB group versus the TOG group was 1.146 ± 1.27 versus 1.481 ± 1.62 (P = .032), but the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was not met. The 3-month ASES Index scores in the SB, SP, and TOG groups were 68.991 ± 18.64, 66.499 ± 17.89, and 67.274 ± 16.9, respectively (P = .0159), and similarly, the MCID was not met. At 2 years, the ASES scores in the SB, SP, and TOG groups improved from 49.986 ± 18.68, 49.54 ± 16.86, and 49.697 ± 7.84, respectively, preoperatively to 86.00 ± 18.09, 87.60 ± 17.69, and 86.86 ± 16.36, respectively, postoperatively (P > .12). Conclusions The SB, SP, and TOG BT procedures each resulted in excellent clinical improvement based on patient-reported outcome measures from a global registry. On the basis of the MCID, no technique was clinically superior to the other techniques in terms of VAS, ASES, or SANE scores at any time point up to 2 years. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
|
6
|
Menendez ME, Collin P, Denard PJ. Clinical Faceoff: Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis for the Treatment of Proximal Biceps Pathology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:455-457. [PMID: 36198115 PMCID: PMC9928663 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philippe Collin
- American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
- Cilinique Victor Hugo Paris Vivalto Santé, Paris, France
| | - Patrick J. Denard
- Oregon Shoulder Institute at Southern Oregon Orthopedics, Medford, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mancini MR, Horinek JL, Phillips CJ, Denard PJ. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Clin Sports Med 2023; 42:81-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
8
|
Onlay Versus Inlay Biceps Tenodesis for Long Head of Biceps Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2022; 6:01979360-202212000-00010. [PMID: 36732300 PMCID: PMC9746747 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-22-00255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proximal biceps tenodesis is a common surgical treatment of tendinosis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Two of the most common techniques incorporate onlay and inlay fixation methods, which can be done arthroscopically or open and in a variety of anatomic locations. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between onlay versus inlay humeral fixation for biceps tenodesis for long head of the biceps tendon pathology. METHODS A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Only studies reporting outcomes and complications after onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses were included. RESULTS Six studies with a total of 418 patients (252 onlay, 166 inlay) with a mean age of 56.84 years were included. Visual analog pain scale scores, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score did not differ. "Popeye" deformity was found in 17 patients (7.80%) in the onlay group and in 15 patients (11.28%) in the inlay group (odds ratio, 0.28; P = 0.07). No difference in postoperative cramping or failure rates was found. CONCLUSION Both onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses result in improved clinical outcomes and are at low risk of Popeye deformities, with no statistically significant differences between either method. Additional studies are required to assess the clinical significance of these differences.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tayne S, Kim BI, Lau BC. Physeal Sparing Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Anchor for Femoral Fixation of Graft. VIDEO JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/26350254221115202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background: Patellar instability is a common problem in the active pediatric population. Physeal sparing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a soft suture anchor for femoral graft fixation has the proposed advantages of diminishing volumetric bony removal from the epiphysis, increasing the margin of safety with respect to notch, trochlear, and/or physeal damage, as well as reducing the risk of thermal damage to the physis during socket reaming. Indications: MPFL reconstruction is indicated in patients with recurrent patellar instability with MPFL tear or attenuation on magnetic resonance imaging or failure of conservative treatment. Physeal sparing techniques are necessary in the pediatric population to prevent growth disturbance and deformities that can lead to significant long-term disability. Technique Description: The patient was placed in supine position. Following examination under anesthesia, diagnostic arthroscopy was performed to assess for patellofemoral chondral defects. The surgical technique required 6 steps: (1) medial patellar dissection, (2) patellar anchor placement with 1.8-mm suture anchors, (3) medial femoral dissection over Schottle’s point, (4) femoral anchor placement using 2.8-mm double loaded anchor, (5) allograft femoral fixation, and (6) allograft patellar fixation. After skin closure, examination under anesthesia was repeated. Results: The patient was weight-bearing as tolerated immediately after surgery, using a brace for the first 6 weeks. Rehabilitation progressed from regaining range of motion, strengthening of the operative extremity, and returning to sport activities. In the senior author’s experience using this technique, there have been no recurrent patellar dislocations and no evidence of growth disturbance or angulation. One patient did find that the graft was prominent over the femoral epicondyle and returned to the operating room for debulking at 9 months postoperatively. Discussion/Conclusion: In conclusion, we propose that physeal sparing MPFL reconstruction using soft anchors for patellar and femoral fixation offers a simple and safe technique with reproducible anatomic graft placement and favorable clinical outcomes. This technique is technically simple and can be easily learned by surgeons familiar with adult MPFL reconstruction techniques. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Tayne
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Billy I. Kim
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian C. Lau
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Sports Sciences Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhou M, Zhou C, Cui D, Long Y, Guo J, Zheng Z, Meng K, Zhang J, Hou J, Yang R. The high resistance loop (H-loop) technique used for all-inside arthroscopic knotless suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: A case series. Front Surg 2022; 9:917853. [PMID: 36189379 PMCID: PMC9515399 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.917853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Suprapectoral tenodesis is a common technique for the treatment of long head biceps tendon lesions. However, so far, there is no gold standard treatment in all-inside arthroscopy. The purpose of the present study was to introduce and evaluate the functional outcomes of an innovative, all-inside arthroscopic high resistance loop (H-loop, high resistance to tissue cutout and 360° grasping of the tendon) technique for long head of biceps (LHB) tenodesis. Method From September 2020 to March 2022, a series of cases of 32 consecutive patients (28 rotator cuff tear with LHBT pathology and 4 superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears which including 2 type II and 2 type IV) who received LHB tenodesis using all-inside arthroscopic high resistance loop technique were included in this study. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score (ASES), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test Score (SST), Constant–Murley scores, and University of California at Los Angeles Scoring System (UCLA) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients in preoperative and final follow-up. Meanwhile, postoperative complications were also observed. Result 32 patients (14 women and 18 men, average age was 55.7 years) underwent all-inside arthroscopic knotless suprapectoral biceps tenodesis using the H-Loop stitch technique. The mean time of follow-up was 16.2 ± 2.6 months. The ASES, VAS, Constant–Murley, SST, and UCLA scores improved from 51.5 ± 15.8, 5.5 ± 1.6, 57.8 ± 14.7, 5.0 ± 2.8, and 16.1 ± 3.8 preoperatively, to 89.1 ± 7.5, 1.0 ± 0.8, 87.3 ± 5.5, 10.4 ± 1.5, and 31.3 ± 2.6 in the last follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001). During the follow-up, no patients in this study experienced postoperative complications such as infection of the wound, injury of nerves, and hardware failure; no patients required revision after their operation. In addition, none of the patients had cramping or a “Popeye” deformity during follow-up. Conclusion This article presents an innovative, all-arthroscopic H-loop technique for LHB tenodesis. This technique for LHB tenodesis showed favorable functional and cosmetic outcomes, as well as high satisfaction rates. Due to its simplicity of operation and satisfactory preliminary clinical outcomes, H-loop technique is perhaps another option to choose in all-inside arthroscopic LHB tenodesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rui Yang
- Correspondence: Rui Yang Jingyi Hou
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Taylor MZ, Caldwell PE, Pearson SE. Failure and Complication Rates in Common Sports and Arthroscopic Procedures: Reality Check. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2022; 30:10-16. [PMID: 35113837 DOI: 10.1097/jsa.0000000000000338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Expectations following sports medicine and arthroscopic procedures have been elevated because of captivating modern-day media coverage of high-profile athletic injuries, surgery, and rapid return to sports. Unfortunately, this general perception may be misleading, and orthopedic sports medicine physicians must be aware of the harsh reality of the trials and tribulations associated with the subspecialty. The purpose of this review article is to provide an updated brief overview of the complications and failure rates associated with common arthroscopic procedures including rotator cuff repair, biceps tenodesis, Bankart procedure, Latarjet procedure, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, anterior cruciate ligament repair, meniscal repair, tibial tubercle osteotomy, and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Highlighting the complications is the first step toward early recognition, enhancing preventative measures, and successful management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Z Taylor
- Orthopaedic Research of Virginia (MZT, PEC, and SEP) and Tuckahoe Orthopaedic Associates, Ltd., (PEC), Richmond, VA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huddleston HP, Kurtzman JS, Gedailovich S, Koehler SM, Aibinder WR. The rate and reporting of fracture after biceps tenodesis: A systematic review. J Orthop 2021; 28:70-85. [PMID: 34880569 PMCID: PMC8633822 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this systematic review was to (1) define the cumulative humerus fracture rate after BT and (2) compare how often fracture rate was reported compared to other complications. METHODS A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS 39 studies reported complications and 30 reported no complications. Of the 39 studies that reported complications, 5 studies reported fracture after BT (n = 669, cumulative incidence of 0.53%). The overall non-fracture complication rate was 12.9%. DISCUSSION Due to the relatively high incidence of fracture, surgeons should ensure that this complication is disclosed to patients undergoing BT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailey P. Huddleston
- SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA
| | - Joey S. Kurtzman
- SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA
| | - Samuel Gedailovich
- SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA
| | - Steven M. Koehler
- SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA
| | - William R. Aibinder
- SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA
| |
Collapse
|