Influence of Fatty Infiltration on Hip Abductor Repair Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

High Rate of Concomitant Lumbo-Sacral Spine Pathology in the Setting of Hip Abductor Tendon Repair

BACKGROUND

Hip abductor deficiency is a common cause of lateral hip pain in middle-aged patients. Identifying upstream muscle denervation originating in the lumbo-sacral spine could potentially impact the management of patients who have abductor deficiency. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of lumbo-sacral pathology (L4 to S1) in patients undergoing hip abductor tendon repair.

METHODS

All cases of primary hip abductor repair performed at a tertiary care center between January 2010 and December 2021 were reviewed. Patients were classified into the following groups: A) confirmed L4 to S1 disease based on preoperative or perioperative L4 to S1 interventions (ie, surgery, epidural injections, and/or positive electromyography findings); B) radiographic evidence on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating nerve compression at L4 to S1; and C) no evidence of L4 to S1 disease.

RESULTS

There were 131 cases of primary hip abductor repair that were included. Over 80% of patients were women, who had a mean age of 64 years (range, 20 to 85). There were thirteen patients (9.9%) who underwent concomitant total hip arthroplasty (THA). Of the included patients, 29% (n = 38) were categorized into group A, 12% (n = 16) into group B, and 59% (n = 77) into group C. Patients who had L4 to S1 pathology were older than patients who did not have L4 to S1 pathology (67 versus 61 years, P = .004). Of the patients undergoing concomitant THA and hip abductor repair, 54% demonstrated evidence of lumbo-sacral spine pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 40% of patients undergoing isolated hip abductor tendon repair and >50% of patients undergoing concomitant hip abductor tendon repair and THA demonstrated evidence of L4 to S1 disease perioperatively. Patients demonstrating symptomatic hip abductor deficiency should be screened for concomitant lower lumbo-sacral spine pathology.

Sonographic pathoanatomy of greater trochanteric pain syndrome

AIMS

To identify and highlight pertinent US features that could serve as imaging biomarkers to describe different patient phenotypes, within Great Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) clinical diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using ultrasound we evaluated eighty-eight clinically diagnosed patients with GTPS, for tendon matrix changes and calcium deposits in the gluteus medius (superoposterior and lateral aspects) and in the gluteus minimus. Peritrochanteric examination included fascia lata, trochanteric bursa, cortical irregularities and the presence of enthesophytes. The association of pathological changes with pain and functionality was evaluated using multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

Out of the 88 patients, 86 examinations (97.7%) detected gluteus medius tendinopathy, and 54 patients (61.4%) had gluteus minimus tendinopathy in addition. Calcium deposits were present in 97.7% of patients, associated with tenderness (p = 0.009), and most often located in the gluteus medius rather than in the gluteus minimus (p = 0.014); calcifications were associated with tendon thickness (p = 0.042), hypoechogenicity (p = 0.005) and the presence of partial tears (p = 0.030). Bursa swelling occurred in 36 patients (40.9%); multivariate regression models predicted less pain in patients with bursa distension (p = 0.008) and dysfunction in patients with gluteal muscle atrophy (p = 0.001) and loss of fibrillar pattern in the gluteus medius (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

GTPS involves both degenerative calcifying gluteal tendinopathy and alterations in the peritrochanteric space associated with physical function and pain. The severity of GTPS can be assessed using ultrasound imaging biomarkers.

Editorial Commentary: Long-Term Follow-Up After Endoscopic Gluteal Repair Plus Hip Arthroscopy Shows Durable Results Using Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Scores That Largely Exceed the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Gluteus medius and minimus tendon pathology is a common cause of lateral hip pain. In patients who are dissatisfied with their hip condition following nonsurgical treatment, gluteal repair has demonstrated excellent short-, mid-, and, now recently, long-term subjective patient-reported and objective clinician-measured outcomes. In patients with peritrochanteric hip pain, the proportion of their overall hip pain may be influenced by the hip joint due to conditions like femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, acetabular dysplasia, labral tears, and arthritis. Thus, surgical decision-making must include consideration of also addressing the joint at the same time as the gluteal repair. This is sometimes challenging due to the high frequency of observing labral injuries and cam/pincer/dysplasia morphology in patients without symptoms due to the "radiographic abnormalities." Labral pathology is also more prevalent in older patients, who happen to also be those individuals with symptomatic gluteal tendon pain. Both open and endoscopic approaches to the gluteal tendons have advantages and disadvantages without significant outcomes differences in the short- or mid-term. Long-term clinical follow-up of patients treated with endoscopic gluteal repair with or without concomitant hip arthroscopy should be included in large national and international prospective registries using validated, reliable, and responsive patient-reported outcome scores, with clinical importance assessed using the minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, substantial clinical benefit, and maximal outcome improvement.

Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) at 2 years following open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair

To define Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) threshold scores after open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair. Primary open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair patients from November 2013 to March 2020 were identified. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed preoperatively, 1- and 2-year follow-up, including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain. Thresholds for achieving a MCID and PASS postoperatively were calculated using the distribution method and receiver operator curve analysis; 25 patients (24 females, 1 male, age: 69 ± 6.8 years, body mass index: 26.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2) were included in final analyses. MCID threshold scores for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were calculated as 11.1, 6.2, 15.3 and 14.0, respectively. PASS threshold scores for each of the PROs were as follows: HOS-ADL (71.9), mHHS (60.0), iHOT-12 (49.2) and VAS Pain (36.8). MCID thresholds for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were achieved by 58.3%, 83.3%, 66.7% and 57.1% of patients, respectively. PASS thresholds for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were achieved by 52.4%, 44.8%, 65% and 59.1% of patients, respectively. Open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair results in a high rate of achievement of clinically significant outcomes at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. MCID threshold values for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were 11.1, 6.2, 15.3 and 14.0, respectively. PASS threshold values for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were 71.9, 60.0, 49.2 and 36.8, respectively. The majority of patients achieved clinically significant outcomes with 81.3% and 77.3% achieving MCID and PASS for at least one PRO, respectively.

Open and Endoscopic Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Achieves Clinical Success Regardless of Tear Grade: High-Grade Fatty Infiltration Portends Worse Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate minimum 2-year gluteus medius and/or minimus repair clinical success rates stratified by the 3-grade magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification (MRI grade) and to evaluate clinical success rates by the surgical approach used at each MRI grade and by the Goutallier-Fuchs (GF) classification.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients who underwent primary endoscopic or open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair from 2012 to 2021 performed by a single surgeon. Preoperative MRI scans were classified using the MRI grade and GF classification. Patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at minimum 2-year follow-up. Cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state achievement was recorded. Rates of clinical success, defined as achievement of the 2-year minimal clinically important difference or patient acceptable symptom state with avoidance of revision surgery, were compared by MRI grade, by surgical approach at each MRI grade, and by GF classification.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients (71 with MRI grade 1, 19 with grade 2, and 22 with grade 3) were included. MRI grade 1 patients underwent endoscopic repair (P < .001) more often than the other groups. The overall clinical success rate was 90%. Clinical success rates by MRI grade were 93% for grade 1, 95% for grade 2, and 77% for grade 3 (P = .087). Clinical success rates by the endoscopic and open surgical approaches used at each MRI grade were 93% versus 90% for grade 1 (P = .543), 91% versus 100% for grade 2 (P > .999), and 60% versus 92% for grade 3 (P = .135). GF grade 1 tears achieved a higher rate of clinical success than GF grade 4 tears (100% vs 71%, P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary repair of gluteus medius and/or minimus tears resulted in clinical success in most patients irrespective of MRI grade and irrespective of the surgical approach used at each MRI grade, yet GF grade 1 tears showed a significantly higher clinical success rate than GF grade 4 tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic retrospective case series.

Endoscopic Hip Abductor Tendon Repair Results in Successful Outcomes With 5- to 10-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of endoscopic repair in a consecutive series of patients with follow-up ranging from 5 to 10 years.

METHODS

Sixty-five consecutive hips in 63 patients (2 bilateral) undergoing endoscopic abductor tendon repair with minimum 5-year follow-up were assessed with the modified Harris Hip Score. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was determined as one-half the standard deviation of the amount of improvement.

RESULTS

The mean age was 56.6 years (standard deviation [SD], 11.3 years), with 58 female and 5 male patients. Follow-up was obtained on 64 hips (98.5%) at a mean of 85 months (SD, 15.7 months). There were 33 full-thickness and 32 partial-thickness tears, with 40 gluteus medius tears, 23 medius and minimus tears, and 2 isolated minimus tears. Concomitant arthroscopy of the hip joint was performed in 50 patients (52 hips), including 15 with correction of femoroacetabular impingement. The mean modified Harris Hip Score was 48.4 (SD, 15.7) preoperatively and 83.4 (SD, 15.9) postoperatively, reflecting a mean improvement of 34.9 (95% confidence interval, 34.9 ± 4.3), with 92.2% of patients achieving the MCID of 8.7. There were no complications. Three patients underwent further surgery: One underwent total hip replacement at 11 months after abductor repair, one underwent repeated arthroscopy for joint debridement at 12 months after repair, and one underwent revision abductor repair at 6 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, with 5- to 10-year follow-up, patients undergoing endoscopic abductor tendon repair can respond exceptionally well, with 92.2% achieving the MCID, even among a heterogeneous group of partial- and full-thickness tears with single- and 2-tendon involvement undergoing single- and double-row repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Surgical Treatment and Outcomes for Gluteal Tendon Tears

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gluteus medius and minimus tears, or hip abductor tendon tears, are increasingly identified as a source of lateral hip pain. Once underappreciated and undertreated, they are now recognized as a cause of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and a pathology amenable to both nonoperative and operative modalities. This review summarizes relevant anatomy, clinical presentation, and treatment options for gluteus medius tears, focusing on surgical options.

RECENT FINDINGS

When surgical intervention is indicated, repair, reconstruction, or tendon transfer may be considered. Open and endoscopic repair techniques demonstrate similar outcomes with improvements in patient-reported outcomes and low complication and retear rates for both partial and full thickness tears. Variations in fixation construct and graft augmentations have been described, though clinical evidence remains limited to support specific techniques. Gluteus maximus transfer via open approach is a salvage option for the severely atrophied, retracted, or revision gluteus tendon; however, persistent limitations in abduction strength and gait abnormalities are common. Emerging evidence continues to evolve our understanding of surgical decision-making for gluteus tendon tears. The current literature supports either open or endoscopic repair techniques and open tendon transfer as a salvAage option. Further study is needed to determine the optimal fixation construct, the role of graft augmentation, and patient-related factors that influence postoperative outcomes.

Assessment of fatty infiltration of the hamstring muscles in chronic proximal hamstring ruptures and effect on clinical outcomes after surgical repair: a novel application of the Goutallier classification

INTRODUCTION

Increased time to surgery has been previously associated with poorer clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal hamstring ruptures, though the etiology remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether degree of muscle atrophy, as assessed using the Goutallier classification system, is associated with worse outcomes following surgical treatment of chronic proximal hamstring ruptures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of patients who underwent repair of proximal hamstring ruptures from 2012 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were included if they underwent primary repair of a proximal hamstring rupture ≥ 6 weeks after the date of injury and had accessible preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Exclusion criteria were allograft reconstruction, endoscopic repair, or prior ipsilateral hip surgery. Patients were administered validated surveys: the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT). Fatty atrophy on preoperative MRI was independently graded by two musculoskeletal radiologists using the Goutallier classification. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations of preoperative characteristics with muscle atrophy, as well as mHHS and PHAT scores.

RESULTS

Complete data sets were obtained for 27 patients. A majority of this cohort was male (63.0%), with a mean age of 51.5 ± 11.8 years and BMI of 26.3 ± 3.8. The mean follow-up time was 62.6 ± 23.1 months, and the mean time from injury-to-surgery was 20.4 ± 15.3 weeks. The Goutallier grading inter-reader weighted kappa coefficient was 0.655. Regression analysis demonstrated that atrophy was not significantly associated with PHAT (p = 0.542) or mHHS (p = 0.574) at latest follow-up. Increased age was significantly predictive of muscle atrophy (β = 0.62, p = 0.005) and was also found to be a significant predictor of poorer mHHS (β = - 0.75; p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of atrophy was not found to be an independent predictor of clinical outcomes following repair of chronic proximal hamstring ruptures. Increasing age was significantly predictive of increased atrophy and poorer patient-reported outcomes.

The Gluteus-Score-7 Predicts the Likelihood of Both Clinical Success and Failure Following Surgical Repair of the Hip Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus

PURPOSE

To identify patient preoperative history, examination, and imaging characteristics that increase the risk of postoperative failure of gluteus medius/minimus repair, and to develop a decision-making aid predictive of clinical outcomes for patients undergoing gluteus medius/minimus repair.

METHODS

Patients from 2012 to 2020 at a single institution undergoing gluteus medius/minimus repair with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. MRIs were graded according to the "three-grade" classification system: grade 1: partial-thickness tear, grade 2: full-thickness tears with <2 cm of retraction, grade 3: full-thickness tears with ≥2 cm retraction. Failure was defined as undergoing revision within 2 years postoperatively or not achieving both a cohort-calculated minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and responding "no" to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). Inversely, success was defined as reaching both an MCID and responding "yes" to PASS. Predictors of failure were verified on logistic regression and a predictive scoring model, the Gluteus-Score-7, was generated to guide treatment-decision making.

RESULTS

In total, 30 of 142 patients (21.1%) were clinical failures at mean ± SD follow-up of 27.0 ± 5.2 months. Preoperative smoking (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-8.4; P = .041), lower back pain (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-7.3; P = .038), presence of a limp or Trendelenburg gait (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.5-10.2; P = .006), history of psychiatric diagnosis (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3-10.8; P = .014), and increased MRI classification grades (P ≤ .042) were independent predictors of failure. The Gluteus-Score-7 was generated with each history/examination predictor assigned 1 point and MRI classes assigned corresponding 1-3 points (min 1, max 7 score). A score of ≥4/7 points was associated with risk of failure and a score ≤2/7 points was associated with clinical success.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent risk factors for revision or not achieving either MCID or PASS after gluteus medius and/or minimus tendon repair include smoking, preoperative lower back pain, psychiatric history, Trendelenburg gait, and full-thickness tears, especially tears with ≥2 cm retraction. The Gluteus-Score-7 tool incorporating these factors can identify patients at risk of both surgical treatment failure and success, which may be useful for clinical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Similar Outcomes Are Found Between Quadriceps Tendon Repair With Transosseous Tunnels and Suture Anchors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and biomechanical performance of transosseous tunnels compared with suture anchors for quadriceps tendon repair.

Methods

In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search was performed in April 2021 in the following databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed (1980-2021), MEDLINE (1980-2021), Embase (1980-2021), and CINAHL (1980-2021). Level I-IV studies were included if they provided outcome data for surgical repair of the quadriceps tendon using transosseous tunnels or suture anchors with minimum 1-year follow-up. Biomechanical studies comparing transosseous tunnels and suture anchors were separately analyzed.

Results

The systematic search yielded 1,837 citations, 23 of which met inclusion criteria (18 clinical, 5 biomechanical). In total, 13 studies reported results for transosseous repair and 7 studies reported results for repair with suture anchors. There were results for 508 patients from clinical studies. The average postoperative Lysholm score ranged from 88 to 92 for suture anchor repairs and 72.8 to 94 for transosseous repairs with range of motion ranging from 117° to 138° and 116° to 135°, respectively. Synthesis of the biomechanical data revealed the mean difference in load to failure was not significant between constructs (137.21; 95% confidence interval -10.14 to 284.57 N; P = .068).

Conclusions

Transosseous and suture anchor techniques for quadriceps tendon repair result in similar biomechanical and postoperative outcomes. No difference between techniques in regard to ultimate load to failure among comparative biomechanical studies were observed.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review level III-IV studies.

Short-term outcomes following open gluteus maximus transfer for the management of hip abductor tears

Tears of the gluteus medius and minimus are an important cause of recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Although endoscopic and open abductor repairs have demonstrated promising outcomes, the success of these techniques is dependent on the size of the tear and the quality of the tissue. In patients presenting with abductor insufficiency and evidence of previous repair failure, large retracted tears, muscle atrophy and/or fatty infiltration, reconstruction/augmentation techniques should be considered. In the present study, we present a retrospective cohort study assessing patient outcomes following open gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable or severely retracted gluteus medius tears. Patients were included in the present study if they underwent open gluteus maximus transfer to address hip abductor tears that a senior surgeon deemed irreparable or at high risk for failure following isolated repair secondary to the following tear characteristics: large tears with >2 cm of retraction, the presence of extensive fatty infiltration (Goutallier Grade 3 or greater) and/or patients requiring revision abductor repair due to primary repair failure with associated pain and a Trendelenburg gait. Patients undergoing a concomitant, or those with a previous history of hip arthroplasty, were excluded from the study. All participants were prospectively enrolled in the study, and both pre- and post-operative patient-reported outcomes were collected at 6 months and 1 year including the modified Hip Harris Score, Visual Analog Score, Hip Outcomes Score of Activities Daily Living, Hip Outcomes Score for Sports-Related Activities and Overall Satisfaction with Hip. Pre-operative scores were compared with post-operative assessments using Student's t-test with a significance level of P < 0.05. Twenty-one patients and 22 hips were included. The average age was 69 (SD ±9.2) and 17 (81%) were females. The average body mass index was 30.0 (±6.2). The outcome scores at both 6 months and 1 year demonstrated significant improvements compared with pre-operative functional assessment. This article reports the utility of gluteus medius/minimus repair augmentation or reconstruction via gluteus maximus transfer demonstrating improvement in patient-reported outcomes at short-term follow-up.

Three-Grade Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Tear Classification System Provides Excellent Inter-Rater Reliability

Purpose

To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification system integrating tear characteristics including tear thickness (partial vs full) and tear retraction (less than or greater than 2 cm) for gluteus medius and/or minimus tears and to determine the inter-rater reliability of this MRI-based classification for gluteus medius and/or minimus tears.

Methods

Patients who underwent primary endoscopic or open repair of gluteus medius and/or minimus tears between 2012 and 2022 were identified to be included in the review of 1.5-T MRI scans. One hundred MRI scans were randomized for review by 2 orthopaedic surgeons and evaluated for tear thickness (partial vs full), extent of retraction, and degree of fatty infiltration according to an applied Goutallier-Fuchs (G-F) classification. Tears were also graded according to the 3-grade MRI-based classification system as follows: grade 1, partial-thickness tears; grade 2, full-thickness tears with less than 2 cm of retraction; grade 3, full thickness with 2 cm or more retraction. Inter-rater reliability was calculated by absolute and relative agreement using Cohen's kappa (κ). Significance was defined by P value <.05.

Results

In total, 221 patients were identified, and after application of exclusion criteria and randomization, 100 scans were evaluated. The 3-grade classification system demonstrated high absolute agreement (88%) comparable to the absolute agreement of the G-F classification (67%). The 3-grade classification system demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.753), whereas the G-F classification demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.489).

Conclusions

The proposed 3-grade MRI-based classification system for gluteus medius and/or minimus tears demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability, comparable with that of the applied G-F classification.

Clinical Relevance

It is important to understand how gluteus medius and/or minimus tear characteristics impact postoperative outcomes. The 3-grade MRI-based classification incorporates tear thickness and amount of retraction that can complement previous classification systems to give the provider and patient more information when considering treatment options.

Labral Tears and Chondral Lesions Are Common Comorbidities Identified During Endoscopic Repair of Gluteal Tendon Tears for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on intraoperative findings during endoscopic treatment for greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). Secondary outcomes were preoperative imaging findings and postoperative functional outcome measures.

METHODS

Medline, PubMED, and Embase databases were searched from inception (1946, 1966, and 1974, respectively), to July 15, 2021, for records reporting intraoperative findings during endoscopic surgery for GTPS. Studies of Level I-IV evidence were eligible. All studies were assessed for quality using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most patients underwent endoscopic greater trochanteric bursectomy with repair of the gluteal tendons. Intraoperative conditions reported were gluteal tendon tears usually involving the gluteus medius tendon, labral tears, and chondral lesions. Three studies reported an average of 9% of patients who subsequently underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale, and functional outcome measures were measured using the modified Harris Hip Score, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific subscale, Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living subscale, and iHOT-12. Pain and functional outcomes demonstrated significant improvement in nearly all the studies where they were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent endoscopic management of GTPS commonly underwent repair of gluteal tendon tears, and in many cases had concomitant labral tears and chondral lesions identified intraoperatively. There were low rates of adverse events, repair failure, and revision surgery. Patient-reported functional outcomes were improved at follow-up at least 1 year postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level IV or better investigations.

Ilizaliturri Jr. V, Kohlrieser D, Laskovski J, Lifshitz L, P. McGovern R, Monnington K, O’Donnell J, Takla A, Tyler T, Voight M, Wuerz T, Martin RL. The 2022 International Society for Hip Preservation (ISHA) physiotherapy agreement on assessment and treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS): an international consensus statement

The 2022 International Society of Hip Preservation (ISHA) physiotherapy agreement on assessment and treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) was intended to present a physiotherapy consensus on the assessment and surgical and non-surgical physiotherapy management of patients with GTPS. The panel consisted of 15 physiotherapists and eight orthopaedic surgeons. Currently, there is a lack of high-quality literature supporting non-operative and operative physiotherapy management. Therefore, a group of physiotherapists who specialize in the treatment of non-arthritic hip pathology created this consensus statement regarding physiotherapy management of GTPS. The consensus was conducted using a modified Delphi technique to guide physiotherapy-related decisions according to the current knowledge and expertise regarding the following: (i) evaluation of GTPS, (ii) non-surgical physiotherapy management, (iii) use of corticosteroids and orthobiologics and (iv) surgical indications and post-operative physiotherapy management.

Natural History of Degenerative Hip Abductor Tendon Lesions

BACKGROUND

The best treatment of degenerative hip abductor tendon lesions remains largely unknown, as the natural course of the disease has not yet been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate the natural history of symptomatic degenerative hip abductor lesions.

HYPOTHESIS

Nonoperatively treated hip abductor lesions progress over time, resulting in refractory hip pain and low functional outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series (prognosis); Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome and degenerative changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the symptomatic hip were included. Bilateral hip MRI scans and a clinical examination were performed at a minimum follow-up of 36 months to study the type and location of hip abductor lesion. Progression of a lesion was defined as a more severe lesion as compared with the initial MRI results or if the lesion extended to another, initially not involved, trochanteric facet. The muscle's fatty infiltration (FI) was also described.

RESULTS

From 106 patients identified, 58 patients (64 hips) aged 66 ± 14 years (mean ± SD) agreed to return to the clinic for follow-up MRI and met the inclusion criteria. At a mean 71-month follow-up, an overall 34% (22/64) of lesions had progressed over time: from trochanteric bursitis to tendinopathy (9/64, 14%) or partial tear (5/64, 8%), from tendinopathy to partial tear (4/64, 6%), from a partial to complete tear (3/64, 4.5%), and with 1 complete tear (1/64, 1.5%) extending to another trochanteric facet. Interestingly, 90% of partial tears remained stable or transformed into a scar. Although patients with a progressive lesion experienced more trochanteric pain (visual analog scale, 4.6 vs 2.8; P = .001), the functional outcomes were comparable with patients with a stable lesion. The majority of hips with a partial tear (64%) demonstrated a progression of gluteus minimus FI from a median grade of 1 to 2, whereas only 1 hip (3%) progressed from grade 2 to 3. Only 3 hips (9%) with a partial tear had a progression of gluteus medius FI, which did not differ significantly from the contralateral unaffected side.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative treatment might be a valid long-term option for degenerative hip abductor lesions, especially for partial tears, which demonstrated a low risk of clinically relevant progression or muscle FI and similar clinical outcomes to those reported in the literature for operatively treated hip abductor tendon lesions.

Surgical Treatment of Gluteus Medius Tears

The gluteus medius originates on the posterior face of the ilium between the posterior and anterior gluteal lines and inserts into the lateral and superoposterior facets of the greater trochanter. Because of the asymmetric nature of the muscle, tears are more likely to occur on the thinner anterolateral portion of the tendon footprint. Gluteus medius tears range from interstitial, partial thickness tears to retracted, full-thickness tears and may result from trauma, but they are more commonly the result of chronic degeneration. Patients commonly present with lateral hip pain aggravated by weight bearing and sleeping on the affected side, weakness in abduction, and the Trendelenburg sign observable on physical examination. Indications for surgery include failed conservative treatment and an ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging study demonstrating a torn tendon. Surgical intervention aims to reapproximate and secure the torn tendon to the tendon footprint on the greater trochanter via suture anchors. Both open and endoscopic techniques have shown to be effective methods for treating gluteus medius tears at short- and long-term follow-up; however, endoscopic techniques have been shown to result in fewer postoperative complications, such as retear. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found patients with more severe fatty infiltration (FI) may experience greater improvement after open repair, whereas patients with less severe FI may benefit more from endoscopic treatment. A double-row repair maximizes contact area between tendon and bone and has shown to be superior to single-row repair with an endoscopic technique.