The effect of heparin rinse on the biocompatibility of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration

Review of Anticoagulation in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapy is an important, yet challenging, treatment of critically ill patients with kidney dysfunction. Clotting within the dialysis filter or circuit leads to time off therapy and impaired delivery of prescribed treatment. Anticoagulation can be used to prevent this complication; however, doing so introduces risk for unintended complications such as bleeding or metabolic derangements in patients who are already critically ill. A thorough understanding of indications, therapeutic options, and monitoring principles is necessary for safe and effective use of this strategy. This review provides clinicians important information regarding when to anticoagulate, differences in pharmacologic agents, recommended doses, routes of drug delivery, and appropriate laboratory monitoring for patients receiving anticoagulation to support continuous renal replacement therapy.

Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication amongst people who are critically ill, and it is associated with an increased risk of death. For people with severe AKI, continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), which is delivered over 24 hours, is needed when they become haemodynamically unstable. When CKRT is interrupted due to clotting of the extracorporeal circuit, the delivered dose is decreased and thus leading to undertreatment.

OBJECTIVES

This review assessed the efficacy of non-pharmacological measures to maintain circuit patency in CKRT.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 25 January 2021 which includes records identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (parallel-group and cross-over studies), cluster RCTs and quasi-RCTs that examined non-pharmacological interventions to prevent clotting of extracorporeal circuits during CKRT.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three pairs of review authors independently extracted information including participants, interventions/comparators, outcomes, study methods, and risk of bias. The primary outcomes were circuit lifespan and death due to any cause at day 28. We used a random-effects model to perform quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). We assessed risk of bias in included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 20 studies involving 1143 randomised participants were included in the review. The methodological quality of the included studies was low, mainly due to the unclear randomisation process and blinding of the intervention. We found evidence on the following 11 comparisons: (i) continuous venovenous haemodialysis (CVVHD) versus continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF); (ii) CVVHDF versus CVVH; (iii) higher blood flow (≥ 250 mL/minute) versus standard blood flow (< 250 mL/minute); (iv) AN69 membrane (AN69ST) versus other membranes; (v) pre-dilution versus post-dilution; (vi) a longer catheter (> 20 cm) placing the tip targeting the right atrium versus a shorter catheter (≤ 20 cm) placing the tip in the superior vena cava; (vii) surface-modified double-lumen catheter versus standard double-lumen catheter with identical geometry and flow design; (viii) single-site infusion anticoagulation versus double-site infusion anticoagulation; (ix) flat plate filter versus hollow fibre filter of the same membrane type; (x) a filter with a larger membrane surface area versus a smaller one; and (xi) a filter with more and shorter hollow fibre versus a standard filter of the same membrane type. Circuit lifespan was reported in 9 comparisons. Low certainty evidence indicated that CVVHDF (versus CVVH: MD 10.15 hours, 95% CI 5.15 to 15.15; 1 study, 62 circuits), pre-dilution haemofiltration (versus post-dilution haemofiltration: MD 9.34 hours, 95% CI -2.60 to 21.29; 2 studies, 47 circuits; I² = 13%), placing the tip of a longer catheter targeting the right atrium (versus placing a shorter catheter targeting the tip in the superior vena cava: MD 6.50 hours, 95% CI 1.48 to 11.52; 1 study, 420 circuits), and surface-modified double-lumen catheter (versus standard double-lumen catheter: MD 16.00 hours, 95% CI 13.49 to 18.51; 1 study, 262 circuits) may prolong circuit lifespan. However, higher blood flow may not increase circuit lifespan (versus standard blood flow: MD 0.64, 95% CI -3.37 to 4.64; 2 studies, 499 circuits; I² = 70%). More and shorter hollow fibre filters (versus standard filters: MD -5.87 hours, 95% CI -10.18 to -1.56; 1 study, 6 circuits) may reduce circuit lifespan. Death from any cause was reported in four comparisons We are uncertain whether CVVHDF versus CVVH, CVVHD versus CVVH or CVVHDF, longer versus a shorter catheter, or surface-modified double-lumen catheters versus standard double-lumen catheters reduced death due to any cause, in very low certainty evidence. Recovery of kidney function was reported in three comparisons. We are uncertain whether CVVHDF versus CVVH, CVVHDF versus CVVH, or surface-modified double-lumen catheters versus standard double-lumen catheters increased recovery of kidney function. Vascular access complications were reported in two comparisons. Low certainty evidence indicated using a longer catheter (versus a shorter catheter: RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.74) may reduce vascular access complications, however the use of surface-modified double lumen catheters versus standard double-lumen catheters may make little or no difference to vascular access complications.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The use of CVVHDF as compared with CVVH, pre-dilution haemofiltration, a longer catheter, and surface-modified double-lumen catheter may be useful in prolonging the circuit lifespan, while higher blood flow and more and shorter hollow fibre filter may reduce circuit life. The Overall, the certainty of evidence was assessed to be low to very low due to the small sample size of the included studies. Data from future rigorous and transparent research are much needed in order to fully understand the effects of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing circuit coagulation amongst people with AKI receiving CKRT.

Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major comorbidity in hospitalised patients. Patients with severe AKI require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) when they are haemodynamically unstable. CRRT is prescribed assuming it is delivered over 24 hours. However, it is interrupted when the extracorporeal circuits clot and the replacement is required. The interruption may impair the solute clearance as it causes under dosing of CRRT. To prevent the circuit clotting, anticoagulation drugs are frequently used.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting in the extracorporeal circuits during CRRT.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs or cluster RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of pharmacological interventions to prevent clotting of extracorporeal circuits during CRRT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted and assessed independently by two authors. Dichotomous outcomes were calculated as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary review outcomes were major bleeding, successful prevention of clotting (no need of circuit change in the first 24 hours for any reason), and death. Evidence certainty was determined using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 34 completed studies (1960 participants) were included in this review. We identified seven ongoing studies which we plan to assess in a future update of this review. No included studies were free from risk of bias. We rated 30 studies for performance bias and detection bias as high risk of bias. We rated 18 studies for random sequence generation,ààsix studies for the allocation concealment, three studies for performance bias, three studies for detection bias,à nine studies for attrition bias,à14 studies for selective reporting and nine studies for the other potential source of bias, as having low risk of bias. We identified eight studies (581 participants) that compared citrate with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Compared to UFH, citrate probably reduces major bleeding (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.62; moderate certainty evidence) and probably increases successful prevention of clotting (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.87; moderate certainty evidence). Citrate may have little or no effect on death at 28 days (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.30, moderate certainty evidence). Citrate versus UFH may reduce the number of participants who drop out of treatment due to adverse events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.49; low certainty evidence). Compared to UFH, citrate may make little or no difference to the recovery of kidney function (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; low certainty evidence). Compared to UFH, citrate may reduceàthrombocytopenia (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.03; low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether citrate reduces a cost to health care services because of inadequate data. For low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus UFH, six studies (250 participants) were identified. Compared to LMWH, UFH may reduce major bleeding (0.58, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.58; low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether UFH versus LMWH reduces death at 28 days or leads to successful prevention of clotting. Compared to LMWH, UFH may reduce the number of patient dropouts from adverse events (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.02 to 3.53; low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether UFH versus LMWH leads to the recovery of kidney function because no included studies reported this outcome. It was uncertain whether UFH versus LMWH leads to thrombocytopenia. It was uncertain whether UFH reduces a cost to health care services because of inadequate data. For the comparison of UFH to no anticoagulation, one study (10 participants) was identified. It is uncertain whether UFH compare to no anticoagulation leads to more major bleeding. It is uncertain whether UFH improves successful prevention of clotting in the first 24 hours, death at 28 days, the number of patient dropouts due to adverse events, recovery of kidney function, thrombocytopenia, or cost to health care services because no study reported these outcomes. For the comparison ofàcitrate to no anticoagulation,àno completed study was identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently,àavailable evidence does not support the overall superiority of any anticoagulant to another. Compared to UFH, citrate probably reduces major bleeding and prevents clotting and probably has little or no effect on death at 28 days. For other pharmacological anticoagulation methods, there is no available data showing overall superiority to citrate or no pharmacological anticoagulation. Further studies are needed to identify patient populations in which CRRT should commence with no pharmacological anticoagulation or with citrate.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: coagulation-related clinical indicators and complications

BACKGROUND

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) plays a significant role in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV).

METHODS

We collected the plasma samples from 40 patients with AAV and 10 healthy volunteers. The plasma levels of S1P were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The levels of serum creatinine (Scr) were tested by rate method, and then the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of the patients was calculated from the Scr, age, and gender. Prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen (FIB), fibrinogen reduction product (FDP), D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) were tested by turbidimetric inhibition immunoassays. Platelets (PLTs) were tested by fluorescently labeled electrical impedance method.

RESULTS

The plasma levels of S1P were significantly higher in AAV patients than in healthy volunteers. Correlation analysis showed that plasma levels of S1P were negatively correlated with glomerular filtration (P=0.022, r = -0.306), and positively correlated with circulating levels of Birmingham vasculitis activity score (BVAS), PLT and D-dimer, (P=0.004, r = 0.443; P<0.001, r = 0.654; P=0.006, r = 0.427). The 40 patients with AAV were classified into three groups: the thromboembolism group (with complications of cerebral infarction and myocardial infarction, n=6), cerebral ischemia group (n=4), and cerebral hemorrhage group (n=2). The plasma levels of S1P were highest in the thromboembolism group and lowest in the cerebral hemorrhage group (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma levels of S1P were associated with circulating levels of D-dimer, PLT and BVAS in the patients with AAV. Hence, plasma S1P level can be used as a biomarker to predict coagulation-related complications in AAV.

Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major comorbidity in hospitalised patients. Patients with severe AKI require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) when they are haemodynamically unstable. CRRT is prescribed assuming it is delivered over 24 hours. However, it is interrupted when the extracorporeal circuits clot and the replacement is required. The interruption may impair the solute clearance as it causes under dosing of CRRT. To prevent the circuit clotting, anticoagulation drugs are frequently used.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting in the extracorporeal circuits during CRRT.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs or cluster RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of pharmacological interventions to prevent clotting of extracorporeal circuits during CRRT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted and assessed independently by two authors. Dichotomous outcomes were calculated as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary review outcomes were major bleeding, successful prevention of clotting (no need of circuit change in the first 24 hours for any reason), and death. Evidence certainty was determined using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 34 completed studies (1960 participants) were included in this review. We identified seven ongoing studies which we plan to assess in a future update of this review. No included studies were free from risk of bias. We rated 30 studies for performance bias and detection bias as high risk of bias. We rated 18 studies for random sequence generation,  six studies for the allocation concealment, three studies for performance bias, three studies for detection bias,  nine studies for attrition bias, 14 studies for selective reporting and nine studies for the other potential source of bias, as having low risk of bias. We identified eight studies (581 participants) that compared citrate with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Compared to UFH, citrate probably reduces major bleeding (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.62; moderate certainty evidence). Citrate may have little or no effect on death at 28 days (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.30, moderate certainty evidence), while citrate versus UFH may have little or no effect on successful prevention of clotting (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.32; moderate certainty evidence). Citrate versus UFH may reduce the number of participants who drop out of treatment due to adverse events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.49; low certainty evidence). Compared to UFH, citrate may make little or no difference to the recovery of kidney function (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.36; low certainty evidence). Compared to UFH, citrate may reduce thrombocytopenia (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.03; low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether citrate reduces a cost to health care services because of inadequate data. For low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus UFH, six studies (250 participants) were identified. Compared to LMWH, UFH may reduce major bleeding (0.58, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.58; low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether UFH versus LMWH reduces death at 28 days or leads to successful prevention of clotting. Compared to LMWH, UFH may reduce the number of patient dropouts from adverse events (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.02 to 3.53; low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether UFH versus LMWH leads to the recovery of kidney function because no included studies reported this outcome. It was uncertain whether UFH versus LMWH leads to thrombocytopenia. It was uncertain whether UFH reduces a cost to health care services because of inadequate data. For the comparison of UFH to no anticoagulation, one study (10 participants) was identified. It is uncertain whether UFH compare to no anticoagulation leads to more major bleeding. It is uncertain whether UFH improves successful prevention of clotting in the first 24 hours, death at 28 days, the number of patient dropouts due to adverse events, recovery of kidney function, thrombocytopenia, or cost to health care services because no study reported these outcomes. For the comparison of citrate to no anticoagulation, no completed study was identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, available evidence does not support the overall superiority of any anticoagulant to another. Compared to UFH, citrate probably reduces major bleeding and probably has little or no effect on preventing clotting or death at 28 days. For other pharmacological anticoagulation methods, there is no available data showing overall superiority to citrate or no pharmacological anticoagulation. Further studies are needed to identify patient populations in which CRRT should commence with no pharmacological anticoagulation or with citrate.

Rinsing the Extra Corporeal Circuit with a Heparin and Albumin Solution Reduces the Need for Systemic Anticoagulant in Hemodialysis

Background

Systemic anticoagulation during hemodialysis (HD) increases the risk for bleeding complications pre- or post-operatively. Based on the concept of blood-membrane interaction, we developed a heparin-albumin solution to rinse the dialysis circuit before start. The aim of this study was to investigate if this method was a valuable tool for our patients at risk for bleeding complications.

Material and methods

This retrospective, comparative, quality assessment study included 248 HD in 68 patients; Group1: 178 treatments were performed at patients for risk of bleeding using heparin-albumin-priming and Group 2: 70 acute HD were performed on patients without increased risk of bleeding using a bolus of heparin at start and a continuous infusion of heparin. In Group 1 additional heparin was given upon suspicion of progressive clotting. One L saline contained albumin (1 g/l) and heparin (5000 U/l) used for priming. Excess priming solution was removed by filling the circuit with blood at start of treatment.

Results

In Group 1, a mean total dose of 2000 U of heparin was given during the HD (18% performed HD without any heparin) and Group 2 used a mean total dose of 5500 U (p<0.001). There was no increased incidence of clotting in Group 1 versus Group 2 compared to standard HD. No bleeding complications were reported during any of the HA-priming treatments.

Conclusions

Heparin-albumin priming resulted in a reduced total dose of heparin. There was no increased clotting and no incidence of bleeding was reported in either group.

Markers of bone metabolism in hemodialyses and hemodiafiltration

Renal osteodystrophy is a common complication of chronic renal failure and renal replacement therapy. The purpose of the study was to assess whether hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF) affects bone turnover. In all, 45 HD and 17 HDF patients were evaluated with respect to bone metabolism markers. We assessed PTH; markers of bone formation-alkaline phosphatase and its bone isoform, osteocalcin; markers of bone resorption- PICP, ICTP; Ctx; beta2-microglobulin; and urinary DPD. BMD were determined for femoral neck and lumbar spine (L2-L4) using DEXA. Hemodialyzed patients had lower calcidiol, calcitriol, and BMD in the femur neck, and higher phosphate, Kt/V, residual renal function, venous pH, osteocalcin, ALP, bALP, DPD, beta2-microglobulin, ICTP, Ctx, osteoprotegerin, and RANKL than patients on HDF. HDF seems to ameliorate bone metabolism in comparison with HD. Bone turnover in end-stage renal failure might be affected to some extent by the choice of renal replacement therapy.

Anticoagulation in CRRT: Agents and strategies in Australian ICUs

BACKGROUND

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) should ideally operate with as little interruption as possible. The majority of circuit terminations occur due to clotting. The Longevity of CRRT is able to be improved when the extracorporeal circuit is anticoagulated.

AIMS

This article willt focus attention on anticoagulant agents used in Australian intensive care units (ICU) to prevent clotting in the CRRT circuit.

DISCUSSION

Anticoagulants reviewed include unfractionated or standard heparin, regional heparinisation, low-molecular weight heparins and heparinoids, regional citrate, platelet-inhibiting agents (prostacyclin), thrombin antagonists (recombinant hirudin) and therapy with no anticoagulant use. Each type of anticoagulant was reviewed for mode of action, the method of delivery and how the effect is monitored. Circuit life and the incidence of bleeding were considered as the principle end points in selecting therapy, as well as side-effects with administration such as metabolic disturbances, contraindications to use including allergy and ease of use in the clinical environment.

CONCLUSION

No approach to anticoagulation has yet been reported to be as successful in extending circuit life, whilst remaining inexpensive, easy to manage and easy to reverse, as unfractionated heparin. Certain patient conditions may preclude the use of heparin, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT); then heparinoids, thrombin antagonists and sodium citrate are suggested as alternatives. Regional citrate reduces haemorrhagic complications in patients who have coagulation disorders or are at risk of bleeding. Clinical experience with various agents and strategies should also influence choice. The option of no anticoagulant may be appropriate in selected patients rather than more expensive and less familiar drugs.

Effect of regional citrate anticoagulation on thrombogenicity and biocompatibility during CVVHDF

This study was designed to assess the principal markers of thrombogenicity and biocompatibility during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) using regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). In a prospective study, 11 procedures with a polysulfone membrane were performed in nine critically ill patients with acute renal failure and impaired hemostasis. Blood samples were taken before and during CVVHDF at diafilter outlet--before calcium-induced reversal of the effect of citrate--at 15, 60, 360, and 1440 minutes. In four patients, 10 CVVHDF sessions were performed with systemic heparin anticoagulation (HA) using a polyacrylonitrile membrane. During RCA, blood thrombocyte count, plasma thrombin-antithrombin III complexes, beta-thromboglobulin, and von Willebrand factor levels did not differ significantly from baseline. Plasma D dimer levels rose significantly at 360 minutes; however, the difference between diafilter inlet and outlet levels was nonsignificant. There was a significant increase in plasma C5a concentrations and a decline in blood leukocyte count in the early phase of CVVHDF. Just as in RCA, no increase in plasma thrombogenicity indices was observed during HA. However, clotting times in blood entering patients' circulation were significantly prolonged. Plasma C5a concentrations increased significantly at the beginning of CVVHDF. RCA can effectively inhibit the thrombogenic effect of the extracorporeal circuit in CVVHDF. The effect of HA may be similar, however, at the expense of systemic anticoagulation and risk of bleeding. RCA, performed in a way that overcomes thrombogenicity, does not completely eliminate complement activation and/or transient leukopenia during CVVHDF.

Anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy: can the choice be evidence based?

OBJECTIVES

Critical illness increases the tendency to both coagulation and bleeding, complicating anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We analyzed strategies for anticoagulation in CRRT concerning implementation, efficacy and safety to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of the literature published before June 2005. Studies were rated at five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, A being the highest. Grades are labeled with minus if the study design was limited by size or comparability of groups. Data extracted were those on implementation, efficacy (circuit survival), safety (bleeding) and monitoring of anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Due to the quality of the studies recommendation grades are low. If bleeding risk is not increased, unfractionated heparin (activated partial thromboplastin time, APTT, 1-1.4 times normal) or low molecular weight heparin (anti-Xa 0.25-0.35 IU/l) are recommended (grade E). If facilities are adequate, regional anticoagulation with citrate may be preferred (grade C). If bleeding risk is increased, anticoagulation with citrate is recommended (grade D(-)). CRRT without anticoagulation can be considered when coagulopathy is present (grade D(-)). If clotting tendency is increased predilution or the addition of prostaglandins to heparin may be helpful (grade C(-)).

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation for CRRT must be tailored to patient characteristics and local facilities. The implementation of regional anticoagulation with citrate is worthwhile to reduce bleeding risk. Future trials should be randomized and should have sufficient power and well defined endpoints to compensate for the complexity of critical illness-related pro- and anticoagulant forces. An international consensus to define clinical endpoints is advocated.

Tissue factor, its inhibitor, and the thrombogenicity of two new synthetic membranes

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of new high-flux hemodialysis membranes made from polyacrylonitrile (AN69ST) and polysulfone (Helixone) on the plasma levels of tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) playing a key role in hemostasis. Established thrombogenicity markers were also determined.

METHODS

In a clinical prospective randomized study, 10 patients were examined using either membrane at the start and at minutes 15, 60, and 240 of hemodialysis.

RESULTS

Increases in the plasma TF levels reached significance at the end of hemodialysis with both membranes, with the Helixone also after 15 min. TFPI levels tended to rise significantly from minute 15 onward while not differing from baseline at the end of the procedure. Judging by the increase in thrombin-antithrombin III complexes, both membranes significantly activated coagulation at the end of hemodialysis. Platelet factor 4 levels, released during thrombocyte and endothelial stimulation, were elevated from the start of procedures. There were no significant differences between the AN69ST and the Helixone in any of the assessed markers.

CONCLUSIONS

The AN69ST and Helixone membranes do not differ in their effects on TF and TFPI or even in established thrombogenicity markers.