On-line production of ultrapure substitution fluid reduces TNF-alpha- and IL-6 release in patients on hemodiafiltration therapy

Comparison of citrate dialysate in pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration: effect on clot formation and adequacy of dialysis in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Citrate dialysate (CD) has been successfully used in conventional hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy; however, no study has compared pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (oL-HDF). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of citrate anticoagulation for oL-HDF and the metabolic changes and quality of life of patients on hemodialysis treated using both modes.

METHOD

Eight dialysis patients were treated with CD containing 0.8 mmol of citric acid for 4 weeks in each phase. Visual clotting scores were investigated as the primary endpoints. Adequacy of dialysis, laboratory parameters, and quality of life were measured as secondary objectives.

RESULTS

The mean clotting scores in the pre-dilution mode were significantly lower than those in the post-dilution mode and in all phases except the heparin-free phase (p < 0.001 in the baseline phase, p = 0.001 in phase 1, and p = 0.023 in phase 2). The values of Kt/V in both modalities were comparable except during the baseline phase, in which the values of pre-dilution were significantly greater than post-dilution (2.36 ± 0.52/week vs. 1.87 ± 0.33/week;95% CI -0.81 to -0.19, p = 0.002). The patient's quality of life regarding their physical activity level was significantly higher in the post-dilution mode than in the pre-dilution mode at baseline and in phase 1 (p = 0.014 and 0.004 at baseline and in phase 1, respectively). Metabolic changes did not differ between the two modes.

CONCLUSION

Citrate dialysate decreased or prevented anticoagulation in both pre- and post-dilution modes of oL-HDF without significant side effects and had comparable adequacy of dialysis.

Comparison between citrate and acetate dialysate in chronic online hemodiafiltration: A short-term prospective study in pediatric settings

BACKGROUND

The use of citrate in chronic hemodialysis to acidify dialysis solutions, in replacement of acetate, began in the 2000's. The purpose of the following study is to determine whether this change represents a better alternative regarding short-term tolerance, efficiency and biocompatibility of chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT) in pediatric patients.

METHODS

A monocentric prospective observational study was conducted in the pediatric dialysis department of Nancy (France) between December 1st, 2014 and January 25, 2015 on a cohort of pediatric patients under predilution on-line hemodiafiltration (olHDF). Sessions were analysed during two study periods of 14 days: a first period during which dialysis solutions were acidified using acetate and a second during which solutes were acidified using citrate. These periods were separated by a washout period of 28 days on citrate solution. Each patient served as his own control.

RESULTS

Dialysis clinical tolerance seems better under citrate regimen, with no statistical significance. No benefit was brought out regarding the prevention of coagulation accidents in the extracorporeal circuit under citrate regimen. The efficiency of olHDF sessions was similar between periods, both in terms of uremic toxins clearance and medium-molecular-weight molecules (MMWM) removal. The evolution of several biological parameters seemed favourable over the citrate period: increase in pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate, stability of plasma hemoglobin and decrease in erythropoietin resistance index (ERI). However, differences in the variation of these parameters between the two periods were not significant. No severe and/or symptomatic hypocalcemia occurred.

CONCLUSION

The use of citrate instead of acetate in dialysis and substitution solutions appears in the short term as a safe alternative for chronic online hemodiafiltration in children.

Prolonged Daily Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy in ICU Patients by ICU Nurses and ICU Physicians

Objectives

Prolonged daily intermittent renal replacement therapy (PDIRRT) has been proposed as a new form of treatment for severe acute renal failure (ARF). However, this treatment has so far implied a) full dependence on nephrological input, b) lack of any convective clearance and c) limited purification of dialysate water. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility and safety of performing PDIRRT in the ICU with a) no nephrological input, b) the addition of some convective clearance with on-line fluid replacement and c) a new advanced water purification system.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Patients

Fourteen patients treated with PDIRRT.

Setting

ICU of tertiary institution.

Interventions

Treatment of patients with severe ARF and critical illness with PDIRRT. Prescription of treatment by ICU physicians. Conduct of treatment by ICU nurses. Use of combined convective and diffusive therapy with on-line generation of fluid replacement, application of a double-filtration water purification system.

Measurements and Main Results

We prospectively collected demographic, biochemical, hemodynamic and clinical data in 14 patients, who received 30 PDIRRT treatments for a cumulative treatment time of 205.4 hours. The mean age was 57.9 ± 16.0. Eight patients were male and 6 female. Their mean APACHE II score was 24.6 ± 5.9 and their SAPS II score was 41.7 ± 18.8. PDIRRT was used after at least 24 hours of initial stabilization with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). Blood flow was kept at 100ml/min dialysate flow at 200 ml/min and convective clearance varied from 21 ml/min to 33 ml/min. All patients were either anuric or oliguric (UO < 400 ml/day). Ten patients were on mechanical ventilation and 11 patients on vasopressor support. Mean treatment session time was 6.9 ± 1.8 hours. The mean pre-PDIRRT urea was 19.2 ± 6.9 mmol/L and the creatinine was 274 ± 116 μmol/L. The mean pre-PDIRRT lactate was 2.95 ± 2.24 mmol/L. Following treatment, all had significantly decreased to 13.2 ± 6.3 mmol/L, 215 ± 95 μmol/L and 2.25 ± 1.61 mmol/L, respectively (p=<0.0001, <0.0001, <0.05). Bicarbonate levels remained stable during treatment (23.0 ± 3.8 mmol/L to 23.1 ± 2.5 mmol/L). Mean norepinephrine dose changed from 8.8 ± 11.9 μg/min to 12.9 ± 27.0 μg/min after treatment (NS). There were no complications of therapy. Patient ICU survival was 71.4%.

Conclusions

PDIRRT with combined diffusive and convective clearance is an efficacious form of renal replacement, which can be safely and effectively conducted by ICU nurses following prescription by ICU physicians without any nephrological involvement and with adequate double filtration water purification.

Post-dilution on line haemodiafiltration with citrate dialysate: first clinical experience in chronic dialysis patients

Background. Citrate has anticoagulative properties and favorable effects on inflammation, but it has the potential hazards of inducing hypocalcemia. Bicarbonate dialysate (BHD) replacing citrate for acetate is now used in chronic haemodialysis but has never been tested in postdilution online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). Methods. Thirteen chronic stable dialysis patients were enrolled in a pilot, short-term study. Patients underwent one week (3 dialysis sessions) of BHD with 0.8 mmol/L citrate dialysate, followed by one week of postdilution high volume OL-HDF with standard bicarbonate dialysate, and one week of high volume OL-HDF with 0.8 mmol/L citrate dialysate. Results. In citrate OL-HDF pretreatment plasma levels of C-reactive protein and β2-microglobulin were significantly reduced; intra-treatment plasma acetate levels increased in the former technique and decreased in the latter. During both citrate techniques (OL-HDF and HD) ionized calcium levels remained stable within the normal range. Conclusions. Should our promising results be confirmed in a long-term study on a wider population, then OL-HDF with citrate dialysate may represent a further step in improving dialysis biocompatibility.

Effects of hemodiafiltration and high flux hemodialysis on nerve excitability in end-stage kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral neuropathy is the most common neurological complication in end-stage kidney disease. While high flux hemodialysis (HFHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) have become the preferred options for extracorporeal dialysis therapy, the effects of these treatments on nerve excitability have not yet been examined.

METHODS

An observational proof-of-concept study of nerve excitability and neuropathy was undertaken in an incident dialysis population (n = 17) receiving either HFHD or HDF. Nerve excitability techniques were utilised to assess nerve ion channel function and membrane potential, in conjunction with clinical assessment and standard nerve conduction studies. A mathematical model of axonal excitability was used to investigate the underlying basis of the observed changes. Nerve excitability was recorded from the median nerve, before, during and after a single dialysis session and correlated with corresponding biochemical markers. Differences in nerve excitability were compared to normal controls with longitudinal follow-up over an 18 month period.

RESULTS

Nerve excitability was performed in patient cohorts treated with either HFHD (n = 9) or online HDF (n = 8), with similar neuropathy status. Nerve excitability measures in HDF-treated patients were significantly closer to normal values compared to HFHD patients obtained over the course of a dialysis session (p<0.05). Longitudinal studies revealed stability of nerve excitability findings, and thus maintenance of improved nerve function in the HDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has provided evidence that nerve excitability in HDF-treated patients is significantly closer to normal values prior to dialysis, across a single dialysis session and at longitudinal follow-up. These findings offer promise for the management of neuropathy in ESKD and should be confirmed in randomised trials.

Haemodiafiltration-optimal efficiency and safety

Haemodiafiltration (HDF) is the blood purification therapy of choice for those who want significant removal of uraemic solutes beyond the traditional range of small molecules. Combining diffusive and convective solute transport, a HDF treatment comprises the largest number of variables among blood purification therapies, and it is important to understand how they interact in order to optimize the therapy. This review discusses the parameters that determine the efficiency of HDF and how they can be controlled in the different forms of HDF and ‘HDF-like’ therapies practised today. The key to safe and effective HDF therapy is to have access to large volumes of high-quality fluids. Starting with ultrapure dialysis fluid, on-line preparation of a sterile, non-pyrogenic substitution solution can be made an integral part of the treatment, and we describe the necessary conditions for this. On-line HDF can provide the largest removal of the widest range of solutes among available dialysis therapies, and the potential clinical benefits of this are within practical reach for the increasing number of patients dialysed with high-flux membranes and ultrapure dialysis fluid.

Chronic inflammation and mortality in haemodialysis: effect of different renal replacement therapies. Results from the RISCAVID study

BACKGROUND

The 'RISchio CArdiovascolare nei pazienti afferenti all' Area Vasta In Dialisi' (RISCAVID) study is an observational and prospective trial including the whole chronic haemodialysis (HD) population in the northwest part of Tuscany (1.235 million people). The aim of the study was to elucidate the relevance of traditional and non-traditional risk factors of mortality and morbidity in HD patients as well as the impact of different HD modalities.

METHODS

A total of 757 HD patients (mean age 66 +/- 14 years, mean dialytic age 70 +/- 76 months, diabetes 19%) were prospectively followed up for 30 months and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and non-fatal CV events (acute myocardial infarction and stroke) were registered. At the time of the enrolment, demographic, clinical and laboratory data of the whole population were entered into a centralized database. Serum albumin, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were centrally determined at the start of the study. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the HD modality: standard bicarbonate HD (BHD) (n = 424), haemodiafiltration (HDF) with sterile bags (n = 204) and online HDF (n = 129). The Cox proportional hazards regression assessed adjusted differences in CV morbidity and mortality risk; a multivariate analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

All-cause and CV mortality was 12.9%/year and 5.9%/year, respectively. Patients with combined high levels of CRP and pro-inflammatory cytokines showed an increased risk for CV (RR 1.9, P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (RR 2.57, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis adjusted for comorbidity and demographic showed CRP as the most powerful mortality predictor (P < 0.001) followed by IL-6. The Cox proportional hazards regression assessed that online HDF and HDF patients had a significantly increased adjusted cumulative survival than BHD (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Data at 30 months from this study showed the synergic effect of CRP and pro-inflammatory cytokines as the strong predictors of all-cause and CV mortality. HDF was associated with an improved cumulative survival independent of the dialysis dose.

Hemodiafiltration history, technology, and clinical results

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is an extracorporeal renal-replacement technique using a highly permeable membrane, in which diffusion and convection are conveniently combined to enhance solute removal in a wide spectrum of molecular weights. In this modality, ultrafiltration exceeds the desired fluid loss in the patient, and replacement fluid must be administered to achieve the target fluid balance. Over the years, various HDF variants have emerged, including acetate-free biofiltration, high-volume HDF, internal HDF, paired-filtration dialysis, middilution HDF, double high-flux HDF, push-pull HDF, and online HDF. Recent technology has allowed online production of large volumes of microbiologically ultrapure fluid for reinfusion, greatly simplifying the practice of HDF. Several advantages of HDF over purely diffusive hemodialysis techniques have been described in the literature, including a greater clearance of urea, phosphate, beta(2)-microglobulin and other larger solutes, reduction in dialysis hypotension, and improved anemia management. Although randomized controlled trials have failed to show a survival benefit of HDF, recent data from large observational studies suggest a positive effect of HDF on survival. This article provides a brief review of the history of HDF, the various HDF techniques, and summary of their clinical effects.

Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is used sporadically for renal replacement therapy in Europe but not in the US. Characteristics and outcomes were compared for patients receiving HDF versus hemodialysis (HD) in five European countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. The study followed 2165 patients from 1998 to 2001, stratified into four groups: low- and high-flux HD, and low- and high-efficiency HDF. Patient characteristics including age, sex, 14 comorbid conditions, and time on dialysis were compared between each group using multivariate logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed adjusted differences in mortality risk. Prevalence of HDF ranged from 1.8% in Spain to 20.1% in Italy. Compared to low-flux HD, patients receiving low-efficiency HDF had significantly longer average duration of end-stage renal disease (7.0 versus 4.7 years), more history of cancer (15.4 versus 8.7%), and lower phosphorus (5.3 versus 5.6 mg/dl); patients receiving high-efficiency HDF had significantly more lung disease (15.5 versus 10.2%) and received a higher single-pool Kt/V (1.44 versus 1.35). High-efficiency HDF patients had lower crude mortality rates than low-flux HD patients. After adjustment, high-efficiency HDF patients had a significant 35% lower mortality risk than those receiving low-flux HD (relative risk=0.65, P=0.01). These observational results suggest that HDF may improve patient survival independently of its higher dialysis dose. Owing to possible selection bias, the potential benefits of HDF must be tested by controlled clinical trials before recommendations can be made for clinical practice.

Online Hemodiafiltration

Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) is an extracorporeal technique for solute removal in renal failure, which takes advantage of an enhancement of convective treatment by the large amount of ultrapure nonpyrogen dialysate being used for substitution of the ultrafiltered volume. It offers many advantages aside from its safe inflammatory profile, which is attributable to the use of ultrapure dialysate and highly biocompatible dialysis membranes. Due to an improved convective clearance, significantly increased removal of large or protein-bound uremic retention solutes can be achieved, with a potential benefit on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent observational data indicate that online HDF offers a survival advantage even after adjustment for comorbidity and dialysis efficiency. Research has been ongoing to maximize further the effectiveness of the technique by new technical innovations such as transmembrane-pressure feedback control or mid-dilution online HDF.

Ultrapure Dialysis Fluid – Direct and Indirect Benefits in Dialysis Therapy

The fluid quality description 'ultrapure' means practically free from bacteria and endotoxin. In quantitative terms it is defined as <0.1 CFU/ml and <0.03 EU/ml. The requirements on endotoxin as well as bacteria should be fulfilled, because these two entities are not strictly correlated. Ultrapure dialysis fluid can be prepared from standard quality fluid by a single step of controlled ultrafiltration. Recent clinical studies demonstrate that the use of ultrapure dialysis fluid in hemodialysis is associated with patient benefits indicating a less inflammatory state compared to hemodialysis with standard fluid. By applying one additional step of controlled ultrafiltration, ultrapure dialysis fluid can be further purified to such high microbiological quality that it can be used for infusion. This opens up the possibility for convective therapies, hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration, for which large volumes of sterile infusion solution are needed. With optimal application of these therapies, solute removal is enhanced, qualitatively as well as quantitatively, and fluid management is facilitated through improved hemodynamic stability.

One Year of Clinical Experience in Postdilution Hemofiltration with Online Reinfusion of Regenerated Ultrafiltrate

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hemofiltrate reinfusion (HFR) is characterized by the use of regenerated ultrafiltrate as replacement fluid. We set up a new technique, postdilution HFR (PD-HFR), aiming at increasing purification efficiency, treatment tolerance and at reducing inflammatory states.

METHODS

We performed PD-HFR in 6 uremic patients during 1 year. Dialysis efficacy, dialyzer blood loss and the behavior of cytokines were evaluated.

RESULTS

No pyrogenic reactions or other adverse events were recorded. Treatment tolerance was excellent. We observed high urea extraction rates and optimal Kt/V values, high beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) extraction rates and a decrease in dialyzer blood loss; also IL-6 and TNF-alpha decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Inversion of the standard HFR configuration has allowed us to improve the removal of both urea and beta2m, and to decrease dialyzer blood loss, with an optimal tolerance. Moreover, the decrease in cytokine levels might attenuate the uremic microinflammatory state.