Long Thrice Weekly Hemodialysis: The Tassin Experience

Modification of Dialysate Na+ Concentration but not Ultrafiltration or Dialysis Treatment Time Affects Tissue Na+ Deposition in Patients on Hemodialysis

Introduction

Tissue Na+ overload is present in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with cardiovascular mortality. Strategies to actively modify tissue Na+ amount in these patients by adjusting the HD regimen have not been evaluated.

Methods

In several substudies, including cross-sectional analyses (n = 75 patients on HD), a cohort study and a cross-over interventional study (n = 10 patients each), we assessed the impact of ultrafiltration (UF) volume, prolongation of dialysis treatment time, and modification of dialysate Na+ concentration on tissue Na+ content using 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (23Na-MRI).

Results

In the cross-sectional analysis of our patients on HD, differences in dialysate sodium concentration ([Na+]) were associated with changes in tissue Na+ content, whereas neither UF volume nor HD treatment time affected tissue Na+ amount. Skin Na+ content was lower in 17 patients on HD, with dialysate [Na+] of <138 mmol/l compared to 58 patients dialyzing at ≥138 mmol/l (20.7 ± 7.3 vs. 26.0 ± 8.8 arbitrary units [a.u.], P < 0.05). In the cohort study, intraindividual prolongation of HD treatment time was not associated with a reduction in tissue Na+ content. Corresponding to the observational data, intraindividual modification of dialysate [Na+] from 138 to 142 to 135 mmol/l resulted in concordant changes in skin Na+ (24.3 ± 7.6 vs. 26.3 ± 8.0 vs. 20.8 ± 5.6 a.u, P < 0.05 each), whereas no significant change in muscle Na+ occurred.

Conclusion

Solely adjustment of dialysate [Na+] had a reproducible impact on tissue Na+ content. 23Na-MRI could be utilized to monitor the effectiveness of dialysate [Na+] modifications in randomized-controlled outcome trials.

Comparison of blood volume biofeedback hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis on cardiovascular stability and blood pressure control in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Despite the improvements in hemodialysis (HD) technology, 20-30% of sessions are still complicated by hypotension or hypotension-related symptoms. Biofeedback systems have proven to reduce the occurrence of such events, but no conclusive findings can lead to wider adoption of these systems. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to establish whether the use of blood volume tracking systems compared to conventional hemodialysis (C-HD) reduces the occurrence of intradialytic hypotension.

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines were used to carry out this systematic review. Randomized clinical trials that evaluated the incidence of intradialytic hypotension during C-HD and blood volume tracking-HD were searched in the current literature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023426328.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven randomized clinical trials were retrieved. Nine studies, including 347 participants and 13,274 HD treatments were considered eligible for this systematic review. The results showed that the use of biofeedback systems reduces the risk of intradialytic hypotension (log odds ratio = 0.63, p = 0.03) in hypotension-prone patients (log odds ratio = 0.54, p = 0.04). When analysis was limited to fluid overloaded or hypertensive patients, it did not show the same effect (log odds ratio = 0.79, p = 0.38). No correlation was found in systolic blood pressure drop during dialysis and in post-dialysis blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of blood volume tracking systems may be effective in reducing the incidence of intradialytic hypotension and allowing for easier attainment of the patients' ideal dry body weight. New studies to examine the long-term effects of the use of blood volume tracking systems on real hard endpoints are needed.

Toward an individualized determination of dialysis adequacy: a narrative review with special emphasis on incremental hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

The search for the 'perfect' renal replacement therapy has been paralleled by the search for the perfect biomarkers for assessing dialysis adequacy. Three main families of markers have been assessed: small molecules (prototype: urea); middle molecules (prototype β2-microglobulin); comprehensive and nutritional markers (prototype of the simplified assessment, albumin levels; composite indexes as malnutrition-inflammation score). After an era of standardization of dialysis treatment, personalized dialysis schedules are increasingly proposed, challenging the dogma of thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we describe the advantages and limitations of the approaches mentioned above, focusing on the open questions regarding personalized schedules and incremental hemodialysis.

EXPERT OPINION

In the era of personalized dialysis, the assessment of dialysis adequacy should be likewise personalized, due to the limits of 'one size fits all' approaches. We have tried to summarize some of the relevant issues regarding the determination of dialysis adequacy, attempting to adapt them to an elderly, highly comorbidity population, which would probably benefit from tailor-made dialysis prescriptions. While no single biomarker allows precisely tailoring the dialysis dose, we suggest using a combination of clinical and biological markers to prescribe dialysis according to comorbidity, life expectancy, residual kidney function, and small and medium-size molecule depuration.

Magnetic resonance imaging determination of tissue sodium in patients with chronic kidney disease

Excess sodium is a major modifiable contributor to hypertension and cardiovascular risk. Knowledge of sodium storage and metabolism has derived mainly from indirect measurements of dietary sodium intake and urinary sodium excretion, however both attempt to measure body sodium and fluid in a two-compartment model of intracellular and extracellular spaces. Our understanding of total body sodium has recently included a storage pool in tissues. In the last two decades, sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging (²³ Na MRI) has allowed dynamic quantification of tissue sodium in vivo. Tissue sodium is independently associated with cardiovascular dysfunction and inflammation. This review explores (i) The revolution of our understanding of sodium physiology, (ii) The development and potential clinical adoption of ²³ Na MRI to provide improved measurement of total body sodium in CKD and (iii) How we can better understand mechanistic and clinical implications of tissue sodium in hypertension, cardiovascular disease and immune dysregulation, especially in the CKD population.

No evidence of a legacy effect on survival following randomization to extended hours dialysis in the ACTIVE Dialysis trial

AIM

Extended hours haemodialysis is associated with superior survival to standard hours. However, residual confounding limits the interpretation of this observation. We aimed to determine the effect of a period of extended hours dialysis on long-term survival among participants in the ACTIVE Dialysis trial.

METHODS

Two-hundred maintenance haemodialysis recipients were randomized to extended hours dialysis (median 24 h/wk) or standard hours dialysis (median 12 h/wk) for 12 months. Further pre-specified observational follow up occurred at 24, 36 and 60 months. Vital status and modality of renal replacement therapy were ascertained.

RESULTS

Over the 5 years, 38 participants died, 30 received a renal transplant, and 6 were lost to follow up. Total weekly dialysis hours did not differ between standard and extended groups during the follow-up period (14.1 hours [95%CI 13.4-14.8] vs 14.8 hours [95%CI 14.1-15.6]; P = .16). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio for extended hours 0.91 [95%CI 0.48-1.72]; P = .77). Similar results were obtained after censoring participants at transplantation, and after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Subgroup analysis did not reveal differences in treatment effect by region, dialysis setting or vintage (P-interaction .51, .54, .12, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Twelve months of extended hours dialysis did not improve long-term survival nor affect dialysis hours after the intervention period. An urgent need remains to further define the optimal dialysis intensity across the broad range of dialysis recipients.

Improvement of clinical outcomes in dialysis: No convincing superiority in dialysis efficacy using hemodiafiltration vs high-flux hemodialysis

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is not associated with lower mortality risk compared to standard hemodialysis (HD). However, there are many critical clinical outcomes in dialysis patients in addition to mortality; the impact of HDF on these other outcomes is not clear. This retrospective study included all patients referred to DaVita Clinics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. High-flux HD was the initial modality in all patients. Those who did not achieve adequacy targets or those with poorly controlled phosphorus were switched to postdilution HDF using 18 to 23 L exchange per treatment. Patients dialyzing with a central venous catheter, patients who dialyzed less than 90 days at DaVita, and those with interrupted HDF were excluded. Of the 1115 patients, 215 (19%) were on HDF and 900 on high-flux HD; the median follow-up was 6 months for all patients. The HDF group showed a significant reduction in serum phosphate (P < .001), a significant increase in serum calcium (P < .012) and a significant improvement in Kt/V (P < .0001). The HDF group had significantly higher hemoglobin levels than the HD group (P = .024), with a significant reduction in weekly erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose after starting HDF (P < .001). A modified protocol that included prolonged dialysis duration, larger-sized dialyzer, faster blood flow rates, and adding hemofiltration fluid may be helpful in achieving the recommended targets. Thus, HDF can enable the achievement of adequate dialysis care in some patients. Randomized-controlled clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Tissue sodium concentrations in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients by lower leg sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging (23Na MRI) allows direct measurement of tissue sodium concentrations. Current knowledge of skin, muscle and bone sodium concentrations in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal replacement therapy patients is limited. In this study we measured the tissue sodium concentrations in CKD, hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with 23Na MRI of the lower leg and explored their correlations with established clinical biomarkers.

METHODS

Ten healthy controls, 12 CKD Stages 3-5, 13 HD and 10 PD patients underwent proton and 23Na MRI of the leg. The skin, soleus and tibia were segmented manually and tissue sodium concentrations were measured. Plasma and serum samples were collected from each subject and analyzed for routine clinical biomarkers. Tissue sodium concentrations were compared between groups and correlations with blood-based biomarkers were explored.

RESULTS

Tissue sodium concentrations in the skin, soleus and tibia were higher in HD and PD patients compared with controls. Serum albumin showed a strong, negative correlation with soleus sodium concentrations in HD patients (r = -0.81, P < 0.01). Estimated glomerular filtration rate showed a negative correlation with tissue sodium concentrations (soleus: r = -0.58, P < 0.01; tibia: r = -0.53, P = 0.01) in merged control-CKD patients. Hemoglobin was negatively correlated with tissue sodium concentrations in CKD (soleus: r = -0.65, P = 0.02; tibia: r = -0.73, P < 0.01) and HD (skin: r = -0.60, P = 0.04; tibia: r = -0.76, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Tissue sodium concentrations, measured by 23Na MRI, increase in HD and PD patients and may be associated with adverse metabolic effects in CKD and dialysis.

Boundaries of frequency and treatment time in conventional hemodialysis: Balancing convenience, economics, and health outcomes

Since the inception of hemodialysis (HD) for patients with chronic kidney disease, the "perfect" dialysis prescription has remained elusive. Part of this may relate to the heterogeneity among populations, individual patients, and differences in access to health provision. The optimal balance between dialysis frequency and duration to achieve reductions in patient morbidity and mortality continues to be debated. The concept of dialysis adequacy originated from a post hoc mathematical analysis of the National Cooperative Study and has evolved to become a way of calculating dialysis dose and standardizing the dialysis prescription. In contrast, in its originally conceived sense, dialysis adequacy referred to the effective clearance of small solutes. Given the evolution of dialysis practice, we now aim to consider dialysis adequacy in a broader and more holistic manner particularly in view of our aging population and focus toward important patient-centered outcomes. While the traditional thrice weekly, HD regimen remains the default renal replacement modality, alternative strategies including short daily HD, long conventional HD, and long nocturnal HD are being widely implemented. We aim for optimal solute clearance, effective ultrafiltration to achieve normotension (while avoiding intradialytic symptoms) and maintenance of nutritional parameters all within the caveat that quality of life and autonomy are preserved.

Practice patterns in transitioning patients from chronic kidney disease to dialysis: a survey of United States nephrologists

Background

There are no guidelines for transitioning patients from chronic kidney disease stage 5 to hemodialysis. We conducted this study to determine if there are uniform patterns in how nephrologists transition patients to dialysis.

Methods

We designed an electronic survey with 39 questions and sent it to a database of practicing nephrologists at the National Kidney Foundation. Factors that were important for transitioning a patient to hemodialysis were evaluated, including medication changes on dialysis initiation, dry weight and dialysis prescription.

Results

160 US Nephrologists replied to the survey; 18% (29/160) of the responses were completed via social media sites. Prior to dialysis, 74% (118/160), prescribed furosemide and 67% (107/160) used furosemide with metolazone. Once dialysis started, only 46% (74/160) of the responders continued patients on diuretics daily. Hypertension medications prescribed in dialysis were calcium channel blockers 69% (112/160), beta blockers 36% (58/160), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor 32% (53/160), angiotensin receptor blocker 29% (46/160) and diuretics 25% (42/160). Once dialysis started, 68% (109/160) routinely changed medications. Most, 67% (107/160) ordered patients to avoid anti-hypertensive medications on dialysis days to allow for ultrafiltration. Dry weight was determined in the first week by 29% (46/160) and in the first month by 53% (85/160). Most, 59% (94/160) felt that multiple causes lead to hypertension. Most nephrologists would prescribe small dialyzers and a shorter period of time for the first dialysis session.

Conclusion

The transition period to chronic hemodialysis has variations in practice patterns and may benefit from further studies to optimize clinical practice.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-018-0943-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

High-Intensity Hemodialysis: The Wave of the Future?

Various modalities of high-intensity hemodialysis are gathering increasing popularity. Some of the advantages of these new dialysis regimens are presented. Time and the increasing use of these novel approaches will ultimately determine their role in the overall management of patients with end-stage renal disease.

Extracellular fluid management and hypertension in urban dwelling versus rural dwelling hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Rural-dwelling hemodialysis patients have less frequent contact with nephrologists than urban-dwelling patients, and are known to have higher mortality. We hypothesized that rural-dwelling hemodialysis patients would have more evidence of poorly controlled extracellular fluid volume (ECVF) than otherwise similar urban-dwellers.

METHODS

We studied prevalent hemodialysis patients within a single renal program in Alberta, Canada and assessed ECFV using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Our primary outcome was impedance vector length (ohm/m) as assessed by BIS using the Xitron Hydra 4200 device, where shorter vector length indicated poorer ECFV control. Because poor ECFV control can lead to hypertension, we also assessed pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure. We measured outcomes at baseline.

RESULTS

We studied 228 hemodialysis patients, of whom 115 (50.4 %) and 113 (49.6 %) were urban- and rural-dwelling, respectively. There were no differences in volume control in urban versus rural participants; odds ratio (OR) for vector length in the lowest sex-specific quartile of vector length was 0.93 (95 % CI 0.54, 1.59) after adjusting for age, sex, diabetic status, years since dialysis initiation and phase angle. The odds of very poor blood pressure control (pre-dialysis blood pressure ≥180/100) did not differ between urban and rural participants [fully adjusted OR 0.96 (0.36, 2.60)].

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in ECFV control do not appear to explain higher mortality among remote- and rural- dwelling hemodialysis patients, compared to urban-dwellers.

Effect of prolonged weekly hemodialysis on survival of maintenance hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis of studies

OBJECTIVE

Use of prolonged nocturnal or daytime hemodialysis (PHD, more than 12 h per week) is associated with improvement of some clinical parameters relative to conventional hemodialysis (CHD, 4 h sessions, thrice weekly), but the effect on survival is unclear. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether PHD improves survival of patients undergoing maintenance HD.

DESIGN

Systematic review of observational studies by meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic searches in MEDLINE (PubMed, 1966-2012), EMBASE (1974-2012), www.clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register Database.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

All prospective or retrospective studies were considered eligible if they were cohort studies or observational studies that compared CHD with PHD (more than 12 h of HD per week due to more HD sessions or increased duration of HD sessions) and the final outcome was all-cause death or mortality.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with a total of 85,722 participants (10,285 PHD patients, 75,437 CHD patients) met the inclusion criteria. Summary estimates indicated that PHD was associated with decreased risk of mortality (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.81, p < 0.00001). Analysis of residual confounders of pooled results from six retrospective studies indicated that PHD patients were less likely to have low hemoglobin (11.7 vs. 11.2 g/dl, p < 0.01), younger (51.2 vs. 58.8 years, p < 0.01), less likely to have diabetes (27.1 vs. 40.8%, p < 0.01), and less likely to use a catheter (18.4 vs. 27.1%, p < 0.01), so these may have affected the outcome measure in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PHD is associated with improved survival relative to CHD, although residual confounders have affected this relationship in observational studies. Large, multicenter randomized, controlled trials are needed to confirm our results.

Novel dialysis modalities: do we need new metrics to optimize treatment?

Delivered dose of hemodialysis has long been an important predictor of mortality. The limitations of conventional hemodialysis treatments have led to a renewed interest in more frequent and longer hemodialysis treatments. As alternative hemodialysis schedules have become more prevalent, a need for modified metrics to measure adequacy has emerged. In addition, there is an interest in finding measures of hemodialysis adequacy that are more reliable in certain subgroups of patients, such as women, ethnic minority groups, or people with small body size. Finally, extended hemodialysis schedules suggest a need for metrics that can measure the clearance of solutes other than urea, such as middle-size molecules, and solutes for which clearance depends on intercompartmental transport across membranes. New metrics to quantify clearance in extended and alternate hemodialysis schedules are needed. As new metrics are developed, it is anticipated that they will also contribute to more accurate assessments of associations between clinical outcomes and delivered dose of dialysis in more intensive, nontraditional hemodialysis schedules. This review provides a historical prospective of dialysis dose and adequacy and describes the need for new metrics from both solute type and dialysis dose prospective as alternative hemodialysis schedules have emerged and become more prevalent.

Dialysis cannot be dosed

Adequate dialysis is difficult to define because we have not identified the toxic solutes that contribute most to uremic illness. Dialysis prescriptions therefore cannot be adjusted to control the levels of these solutes. The current solution to this problem is to define an adequate dose of dialysis on the basis of fraction of urea removed from the body. This has provided a practical guide to treatment as the dialysis population has grown over the past 25 years. Indeed, a lower limit to Kt/V(urea) (or the related urea reduction ratio) is now established as a quality indicator by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid for chronic hemodialysis patients in the United States. For the present, this urea-based standard provides a useful tool to avoid grossly inadequate dialysis. Dialysis dosing, however, based on measurement of a single, relatively nontoxic solute can provide only a very limited guide toward improved treatment. Prescriptions which have similar effects on the index solute can have widely different effects on other solutes. The dose concept discourages attempts to increase the removal of such solutes independent of the index solute. The dose concept further assumes that important solutes are produced at a constant rate relative to body size, and discourages attempts to augment dialysis treatment by reducing solute production. Identification of toxic solutes would provide a more rational basis for the prescription of dialysis and ultimately for improved treatment of patients with renal failure.

International differences in hemodialysis delivery and their influence on outcomes

There are many variations in the delivery of hemodialysis. These variations include components of conventional dialysis, such as membrane type, dialysis dose, and session duration. In addition, alternative approaches to dialysis, such as hemodiafiltration, nocturnal hemodialysis, and short daily hemodialysis, also may be considered. For some of these practice variations, data exist to support one approach over another (eg, fistulas rather than grafts and catheters), but for many, no such data exist. Very few practice variations have been examined in randomized trials, and we are reliant predominantly on observational data. This review examines some practice variations in hemodialysis delivery, attempting to highlight which of these may be appropriate to consider when optimizing dialysis delivery in the clinic.

Preserving residual renal function in dialysis patients: an update on evidence to assist clinical decision making

It has been documented that preservation of residual renal function in dialysis patients improves quality of life as well as survival. Clinical trials on strategies to preserve residual renal function are clearly lacking. While waiting for more results from clinical trials, patients will benefit from clinicians being aware of available knowledge. The aim of this review was to offer an update on current evidence assisting doctors in clinical practice.

Barriers and facilitators of dietary sodium restriction amongst Bangladeshi chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

People of Bangladeshi origin have the highest mortality ratio from coronary heart disease of any minority ethnic group in UK and their rate of kidney disease is three- to five-fold higher than that of the European UK population. However, there is little information regarding their dietary customs or knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards health and nutrition. This multi-method qualitative study aimed to identify: (i) barriers and facilitators to dietary sodium restriction; (ii) traditional and current diet in the UK; and (iii) beliefs and attitudes towards development of hypertension, and the role of sodium.

METHODS

Methods included focus group discussions, vignettes and food diaries. Twenty female chronic kidney disease patients attended four focus group discussions and maintained food diaries; ten responded to vignettes during telephone interviews. Triangulation of the results obtained from the three methods identified categories and themes from qualitative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Identified barriers to sodium restriction were deeply-rooted dietary beliefs, attitudes and a culturally-established taste for salt. Facilitators of change included acceptable strategies for cooking with less salt without affecting palatability. Dietary practices were culturally determined but modified by participants' prosperity in the UK relative to their previous impoverished agrarian lifestyles in Bangladesh.

CONCLUSIONS

Cultural background and orientation were strong determinants of the group's dietary practices and influenced their reception and response to health communication messages. Efforts to understand their cultural mores, interpret and convey health-promotion messages in culturally-appropriate ways met with a positive response.

Treatment time, chronic inflammation, and hemodynamic stability: the overlooked parameters in hemodialysis quantification

Decades after the introduction of chronic maintenance hemodialysis, the optimal means of quantifying dialysis dose remains controversial. Differences of opinion in the international dialysis community lead to substantial diversity in everyday clinical practice. Several studies suggest that the well-recognized international mortality differences in hemodialysis populations may result from these divergent approaches to dialysis care. One of the main areas of divergence is the different degree of reliance on dialysis clearance when prescribing dialysis. The "clearance approach" implies that treatment quality is primarily dependent on efficient removal of uremic toxins as estimated by dialytic urea clearance. Urea can be rapidly removed by high efficiency dialysis in a relatively short time. The main alternative to this strategy is the "time approach" based on the recognition that longer or more frequent dialysis provides benefits beyond increasing urea removal. Some of the putative benefits are more effective volume and blood pressure control, better maintenance of hemodynamic stability because of slower ultrafiltration and removal of uremic toxins that do not behave like urea. Recently, chronic inflammation has been proposed to be an important predictor of outcome in dialysis patients. Inflammatory markers are commonly elevated in chronic renal failure and levels of these seem to correlate with malnutrition, maintenance of residual renal function, and volume control. The relationships between dialysis clearance, treatment time, chronic inflammation, volume control, and hemodynamic stability are explored in this review. We propose that a better understanding of these complex relationships may provide opportunities for improving outcomes of maintenance hemodialysis patients.

The advantages and challenges of increasing the duration and frequency of maintenance dialysis sessions

The duration and frequency of hemodialysis was determined empirically when this therapy first came into use, and treatment was commonly three 8 h sessions per week by the end of the 1960s. Subsequently, however, the growing number of patients who required this therapy had to be reconciled with the shortage of equipment; therefore, dialysis time was decreased to three 4 h sessions per week. At the same time, on the basis of data from the first randomized controlled trial of dialysis -- the National Cooperative Dialysis Study -- Kt/V(urea) was devised as the optimum measure of dialysis adequacy. Nowadays, although Kt/V(urea) targets are fulfilled in an increasing number of patients, observational studies show that individuals on hemodialysis continue to experience a high rate of complications, including hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac failure, hyperphosphatemia, malnutrition and death. Although no randomized controlled trial has yet been published, observational data indicate that increasing hemodialysis time and/or frequency improves a number of these complications, especially the death rate. This Review outlines the advantages of longer and/or more frequent dialysis sessions and highlights the barriers to adoption of such regimens, which largely relate to economics, patient willingness, and organization of dialysis units.

Cardiovascular risk in chronic renal disease and transplantation prevention and management

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the single best predictor of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and in kidney transplant recipients. These populations are considered to be at extraordinarily high risk for CVD and its complications. On the other hand, renal dysfunction should be considered as a CVD risk factor. The management of CVD in patients with chronic kidney disease is a special challenge for clinicians. In this article, major risk factors for CVD are presented, as well as diagnosis of coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, its treatment modalities (pharmacological therapy and coronary revascularisation procedures), and outcomes in patients with chronic renal failure and kidney allograft recipients.