Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration reduce intradialytic hypotension in ESRD

Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension is a common complication of hemodialysis (HD). The application of convective therapies to the outpatient setting may improve outcomes, including intradialytic hypotension. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, we randomly assigned 146 long-term dialysis patients to HD (n = 70), online predilution hemofiltration (HF; n = 36), or online predilution hemodiafiltration (HDF; n = 40). The primary end point was the frequency of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension (ISH). Compared with the run-in period, the frequency of sessions with ISH during the evaluation period increased for HD (7.1 to 7.9%) and decreased for both HF (9.8 to 8.0%) and HDF (10.6 to 5.2%) (P < 0.001). Mean predialysis systolic BP increased by 4.2 mmHg among those who were assigned to HDF compared with decreases of 0.6 and 1.8 mmHg among those who were assigned to HD and HF, respectively (P = 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated significant risk reductions in ISH for both HF (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.92) and HDF (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.63). There was a trend toward higher dropout for those who were assigned to HF (P = 0.107). In conclusion, compared with conventional HD, convective therapies (HDF and HF) reduce ISH in long-term dialysis patients.

Predilution versus postdilution during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a comparison of circuit thrombogenesis

During continuous venovenous hemofiltration, predilution can prolong circuit survival time, but the underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. The aim of the present study was to compare predilution with postdilution, with respect to circuit thrombogenesis. Eight critically ill patients were treated with both predilutional and postdilutional continuous venovenous hemofiltration in a crossover fashion. A filtration flow of 60 ml/min was used in both modes. We chose blood flows of 140 and 200 ml/min during predilution and postdilution, respectively, to keep the total flow through the hemofilter constant. Extracorporeal circuit pressures were measured hourly, and samples of blood and ultrafiltrate were collected at five different time points. Thrombin-antithrombin complexes and prothrombin fragments F1 + 2 were measured by ELISA, and platelet activation was assessed by flow cytometry. No signs of thrombin generation or platelet activation were found during either mode. During postdilution, baseline platelet count and maximal prefilter pressure had a linear relation, whereas both parameters were inversely related with circuit survival time. In summary, predilution and postdilution did not differ with respect to extracorporeal circuit thrombogenesis. During postdilution, baseline platelet count and maximal prefilter pressure were inversely related with circuit survival time.

Effects of acetate-free double-chamber hemodiafiltration and standard dialysis on systemic hemodynamics and troponin T levels

Using acetate as a buffer during hemodialysis is recognized to predispose to intradialytic hypotension; however, bicarbonate-based dialysis is not acetate free. Paired hemodiafiltration (PHF) is a novel online acetate-free technique. We investigated whether PHF is capable of abrogating the changes in systemic hemodynamics and troponin T (cTnT) seen with conventional hemodialysis. Twelve patients entered a randomized crossover study. Blood pressure (BP) and a full range of hemodynamic variables were measured throughout PHF and standard dialysis using continuous pulse wave analysis. We also measured predialysis cTnT in 54 stable and unstable dialysis patients. BP was lower during PHF but without increased instability. Stoke volume and cardiac output declined progressively during both treatments but to a much lesser extent during PHF (p = 0.003, p < 0.0001 respectively), whereas peripheral resistance rose to a larger degree during hemodialysis (p < 0.0001). cTnT levels were lower before PHF as compared with hemodialysis (p = 0.023), with levels falling after PHF and rising after hemodialysis (p < 0.0001). In the supplementary patient group, predialysis median serum cTnT was higher in the unstable patients (p = 0.0001). This study demonstrates that PHF (without exposure to acetate) is associated with less deterioration in systemic hemodynamics, maintenance of BP, and less suppression of myocardial contractility as compared with bicarbonate dialysis.

The hemodynamic effect of calcium ion concentration in the infusate during predilution hemofiltration in chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

It is the prevailing view that convective dialysis techniques stabilize blood pressure. Calcium concentration in the substitution fluid may be important in this respect. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of calcium ion concentration in the substitution fluid on hemodynamic stability during predilution hemofiltration (HF).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, crossover, blinded, controlled trial with 12 stable long-term hemodialysis patients without diabetes. Each patient was randomly assigned to substitution fluid with a calcium ion (iCa) concentration of 2.5 mEq/L (1.25 mmol/L; low-calcium session [L-HF]) or 3.5 mEq/L (1.75 mmol/L; high-calcium session [H-HF]) during 4.5 hours of predilution HF with a volume of 1.24 +/- 0.09 L/kg dry body weight and a temperature of 37 degrees C. Ultrafiltration was kept constant in each patient. Blood pressure (mean, systolic [SBP], and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]), pulse rate, arterial and venous temperature, energy transfer, and relative blood volume were measured at 15-minute intervals. Cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, stroke volume, and iCa were measured hourly. The 2 treatments were matched with the exception of iCa concentration.

RESULTS

A significant intratreatment reduction in cardiac output and stroke volume was shown to the same extent for both groups. Intertreatment comparisons showed a significantly lower mean arterial pressure, SBP, DBP, and total peripheral resistance in the L-HF compared with the H-HF group.

CONCLUSION

iCa concentration of 3.5 versus 2.5. mEq/L (1.75 versus 1.25 mmol/L) in the infusate during predilution HF stabilized blood pressure, possibly because of greater peripheral resistance rather than through changes in cardiac performance.

Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND

Accumulation of larger molecular weight uraemic toxins molecules may have a negative effect on the cardiovascular and nutritional state of dialysis patients and influence uraemic symptomatology. Their clearance can be enhanced by the use of haemofiltration (HF).

METHODS

The effects of low-flux haemodialysis (HD) (ultrapure dialysate; polyamide membranes) and pre-dilution on-line HF (1:1 blood/substitution ratio; target filtration volume: 1.2 times body weight) on cardiovascular and nutritional parameters, interdialytic levels of uraemic toxins and quality of life (QOL; Laupacis questionnaire) were assessed during 1 year follow-up. Forty patients were randomized.

RESULTS

After 1 year, 27 patients were eligible for analysis (HF: 13 patients; HD: 14 patients). Left ventricular mass index did not change in the HF patients (127+/-33 --> 131+/-36 g/m(2) after 12 months) or in the HD group (135+/-34 --> 138+/-32 g/m(2)). Also, there were no changes in pulse wave velocity, and 48 h systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Lean body mass, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, increased in the HF group (44.8+/-8.9 --> 46.2+/-9.6 kg; P<0.05), but not in the HD group (49.4+/-9.2 --> 50.6+/-8.8 kg), although differences between groups were not significant. Insulin-like growth factor-1 levels remained stable in the HF patients, but decreased in the HD group (P<0.05 between groups). QOL for physical symptoms improved in the HF group (4.2+/-1.2 --> 5.0+/-1.1; P<0.05 within the HF group and P = 0.06 between groups), but not in the HD group (4.0+/-1.0 --> 4.4+/-1.4). beta2-microglobulin, complement factor D and homocysteine decreased significantly in the HF but not in the HD group, whereas l-ADMA, leptin and advanced glycation end-products-related fluorescence did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

No changes in cardiovascular parameters were observed during pre-dilution on-line HF compared with low-flux HD. Treatment with on-line HF resulted in marked changes in the uraemic toxicity profile, an improvement in physical well-being and a small improvement in nutritional state.

Haemodynamics and electrolyte balance: a comparison between on-line pre-dilution haemofiltration and haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

An important advantage of convective therapies is improved vascular reactivity. However, it is not well known whether the vascular response during convective therapies remains superior when compared to haemodialysis (HD) with an adjusted temperature of the dialysate. It has also been suggested that convective therapies may impair small electrolyte removal through an effect on the Donnan equilibrium. In the present study, we compared the haemodynamic response and small electrolyte removal between pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration (HF) and HD procedures.

METHODS

Cardiac output (CO), central blood volume (CBV) and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) were assessed, using the saline dilution technique, in 12 stable patients during HF and HD with two different temperatures of the dialysate [36.5 and 35.5 degrees C (HD(36.5) and HD(35.5))]. Balances for sodium, potassium, calcium and conductivity were assessed using total dialysate/filtrate collections. Target filtration volume for HF was 1.2 times body weight. The temperature of the infusate was 36.5 degrees C.

RESULTS

The change (Delta) in CBV was less during HD with a dialysate temperature of 35.5 degrees C (-0.03+/-0.14 l; P<0.05) compared to HF (-0.16+/-0.05 l) and HD(36.5) (-0.11+/-0.14 l), but the other haemodynamic parameters did not differ between the studied techniques. DeltaPVR was significantly related to DeltaCBV (r = -0.46; P<0.01), whereas DeltaCBV was related to ultrafiltration rate (r = -0.34; P = 0.05). DeltaCO was related to DeltaCBV (r = 0.62; P<0.001). Solute balances did not differ between HF and HD.

CONCLUSION

Using the saline dilution method, no difference in the change in CO and PVR was observed between on-line HF vs HD(36.5) and HD(35.5). Only CBV declined to a significantly lesser degree during HD(35.5), although absolute differences were small. Changes in the other haemodynamic variables appeared more dependent upon the degree and rapidity of fluid removal than upon the treatment modality. No difference in small electrolyte balance was observed between HF and HD, suggesting that ionic removal is not impaired during on-line HF.

On-line Preparation of Solutions for Dialysis: Practical Aspects Versus Safety and Regulations

ABSTRACT. On-line preparation, i.e., continuous mixing and immediate use, was introduced for dialysis fluid in 1964, and it contributed significantly to the expansion of dialysis therapy through simplified handling, improved microbiology, and enhanced efficiency. On-line prepared replacement solution for hemofiltration was shown to be clinically safe as early as 1978, but the implementation was delayed for 20 yr because of regulatory conservatism. On-line preparation of sterile and pyrogen-free solutions for infusion is based on the use of water and concentrates that contribute a minimum of microorganisms and are mixed and distributed in a hygienically designed and maintained flow path. Ultrafilters with known retention capacity are placed in strategic positions and dimensioned to remove bacteria and endotoxins, which gives a sterility assurance level of at least six magnitudes, as required by the Pharmacopoeia for sterile products. Microbiologic testing of the fluid should be applied when designing, validating, and troubleshooting on-line systems but not for routine quality control, because it only gives retrospective information. Quality assurance has to be built into a system and the way it is operated. On-line fluid preparation, when properly performed, is safe, simple, and cost-effective and enhances the efficiency as well as the biocompatibility of dialysis therapy.

Predilution haemofiltration--the Second Sardinian Multicentre Study: comparisons between haemofiltration and haemodialysis during identical Kt/V and session times in a long-term cross-over study

BACKGROUND

The potential superiority of various renal replacement treatment modalities consisting largely of convective mass transfer as opposed to primarily diffusive mass transfer, is still a matter of debate. The objective of the present study was to evaluate acute and long-term clinical effects of varying degrees of convection and diffusion in a group of 24 clinically stable patients with end-stage renal disease.

METHODS

The patients were prospectively assigned to three consecutive treatment schedules of 6 months each: phase I (HF1) (on-line predilution haemofiltration)-->phase II (HD) (high-flux haemodialysis)-->phase III (HF2; as phase I). We used the AK100/200 ULTRA monitor (Gambro), which prepares ultrapure dialysis fluid for HD and sterile, pyrogen-free substitution solution for HF. The membrane (polyamide), fluid composition, and treatment time were the same on HF and HD. The targeted equilibrated Kt/V was 1.2 for both treatment modes, creating a similar urea clearance.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients, mean age 62.8+/-8.4 years, completed the study according to the above conditions. Urea kinetics, nutritional parameters, and dry weight were similar in the three periods. The frequency of intra-treatment episodes of hypotension/patient/month was significantly lower on HF1 (1.24) and HF2 (1.27) than on HD (1.80) (P<0.04). It decreased progressively on HF1, then increased on HD, and decreased again during HF2. Patients had fewer muscular cramps on HF than on HD (P<0.03) and required significantly less saline and plasma expander during HF than HD sessions. The prevalence of inter-treatment symptoms, including fatigue and hypotension, was lower on HF than on HD (score difference P=0.04). Quality of life, determined by the Laupacis method in all three periods, showed a tendency towards improvement during the study, reaching the best values during HF2.

CONCLUSIONS

HF has a progressive stabilizing haemodynamic effect, producing a more physiological cardiovascular profile than HD. This long-term effect, observed in stable patients treated under strictly identical conditions, is probably due to the mechanism of convection, and is different from the acute effect observed mainly in unstable patients.