Organ Crosstalk in Acute Kidney Injury: Evidence and Mechanisms

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is becoming a public health problem worldwide. AKI is usually considered a complication of lung, heart, liver, gut, and brain disease, but recent findings have supported that injured kidney can also cause dysfunction of other organs, suggesting organ crosstalk existence in AKI. However, the organ crosstalk in AKI and the underlying mechanisms have not been broadly reviewed or fully investigated. In this review, we summarize recent clinical and laboratory findings of organ crosstalk in AKI and highlight the related molecular mechanisms. Moreover, their crosstalk involves inflammatory and immune responses, hemodynamic change, fluid homeostasis, hormone secretion, nerve reflex regulation, uremic toxin, and oxidative stress. Our review provides important clues for the intervention for AKI and investigates important therapeutic potential from a new perspective.

Effect of iodinated low-osmolar contrast media on the hemostatic system after intraarterial and intravenous contrast administration

PURPOSE

Some of the adverse clinical effects of intravascular radiological contrast agents include the interference of these contrast media with normal hemostatic processes. The aim of this report was to investigate in vivo whether a non-ionic iodinated contrast agent possess prothrombotic or anticoagulant properties.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Hemostatic parameters: vWF (von Willebrand factor), F1+2 (prothrombin fragments 1+2), TAT (thrombin-antithrombin complexes), D-Dimer, β-TG (beta-thromboglobulin) were measured in a group of 35 patients. Blood samples for laboratory investigations were collected before and 30 min after the administration of a iodine contrast agent.

RESULTS

There was observed statistically highly significant contrast-induced increase in TAT and F1+2 (p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, respectively). D-Dimer increase and decrease of β-TG and vWF after contrast medium administration were non significant. The volume of contrast medium has no influence on the assessed hemostatic parameters, while the type of contrast medium and/or the route of the contrast administration may significantly affect hemostatic parameters.

CONCLUSION

We found significant effects of non-ionic agents on hemostatic activation. These effects may be important for adverse reactions and for thromboembolic complications.