The effect of anticonvulsants on the dexamethasone suppression test

Interpretation of common endocrine laboratory tests: technical pitfalls, their mechanisms and practical considerations

Pitfalls in hormonal assays are commonly seen in clinical practice and may lead to erroneous clinical impressions and treatments. In this article, we address common laboratory pitfalls encountered during evaluation of patients with real or presumed endocrine disorders including high dose hook effect and falsely normal prolactin in cases of macroprolactinomas, macroprolactinemia and falsely elevated prolactin, macrothyrotropinemia and falsely elevated TSH, heterophile antibodies leading to false elevation of hormonal concentration, biotin interference with different hormonal assays, cross-reactivity of steroid hormones immunoassays, and others. We describe the mechanisms of such laboratory pitfalls, review clinical scenarios in which they might occur, and discuss the ways to resolve such conundrums. The aim of this article is to present a learning material for the endocrine trainees and practitioners.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis: neuropsychiatric aspects

Evidence of aberrant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) activity in many psychiatric disorders, although not universal, has sparked long-standing interest in HPA hormones as biomarkers of disease or treatment response. HPA activity may be chronically elevated in melancholic depression, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and schizophrenia. The HPA axis may be more reactive to stress in social anxiety disorder and autism spectrum disorders. In contrast, HPA activity is more likely to be low in PTSD and atypical depression. Antidepressants are widely considered to inhibit HPA activity, although inhibition is not unanimously reported in the literature. There is evidence, also uneven, that the mood stabilizers lithium and carbamazepine have the potential to augment HPA measures, while benzodiazepines, atypical antipsychotics, and to some extent, typical antipsychotics have the potential to inhibit HPA activity. Currently, the most reliable use of HPA measures in most disorders is to predict the likelihood of relapse, although changes in HPA activity have also been proposed to play a role in the clinical benefits of psychiatric treatments. Greater attention to patient heterogeneity and more consistent approaches to assessing treatment effects on HPA function may solidify the value of HPA measures in predicting treatment response or developing novel strategies to manage psychiatric disease.

Glucocorticoids as predictors of treatment response in depression

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids and the stress hormone system have been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression and in the mechanism of action of antidepressant response. Many studies have investigated this system in an effort to predict response to antidepressant treatment. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence for using glucocorticoid-related measures for personalized treatment of depression.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE search from 1966 through 2010 and examined English-language studies reporting on the use of endocrine challenge tests and genetic polymorphisms in genes regulating the stress hormone system as predictors of antidepressant response.

RESULTS

While measures of glucocorticoid levels using endocrine tests, as well polymorphisms in genes regulating the stress hormone system, show associations with response to antidepressant treatment, these measures will need to be combined with other variables, including clinical information and other biological measures, to realize the goal of highly predictive and clinically relevant biomarkers.

DISCUSSION

The glucocorticoid system is potentially of great use in predicting antidepressant response. New combinations of biomarkers including these measures should be tested to develop clinically relevant predictors.

Does the dexamethasone suppression test reliably discriminate between psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression?: an exploratory analysis of potential confounds

Previous research has shown that psychotic major depression (PMD) is often associated with higher rates of nonsuppression on the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) compared with nonpsychotic major depression (NMD), suggesting the potential importance of cortisol hypersecretion in the psychotic subtype of the disorder. However, these patient groups also are known to differ from one another on a variety of other clinical variables, and there are numerous factors independent of diagnostic status known to affect the DST. Thus, we investigated possible confounds that could help account for the apparent DST abnormalities in PMD sometimes reported in past research. Hospitalized patients with PMD (n = 11) and NMD (n = 58) were compared on the DST and other clinical variables. As expected, PMD patients showed significantly higher rates of DST nonsuppression (55% vs. 24%; p = 0.04). However, PMD patients also had significantly higher levels of anxiety severity (p = 0.01). The higher rates of nonsuppression in the PMD group were attenuated when these patients were compared with a subsample of NMD patients matched on anxiety severity (55% vs. 55%). Implications for future research on biological markers of PMD are discussed.

Drugs and HPA axis

This paper outlines the interferences of the most widely used drugs with hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal function and the related laboratory parameters, with the purpose of providing practical help to clinicians during testing for hypo- or hypercortisolemic states.

Troglitazone induces CYP3A4 activity leading to falsely abnormal dexamethasone suppression test

After evaluating a patient who appeared to have a falsely abnormal response to the dexamethasone suppression test while taking troglitazone, we examined the effects of troglitazone on the activity of hepatic CYP3A4 and the screening tests for Cushing's syndrome. We studied five healthy women and three healthy men, aged 25 +/- 2 yr, before and after treatment with troglitazone (600 mg daily) for 28 d. Baseline 0800 h cortisol and corticosterone were similar before and after troglitazone treatment. Before troglitazone treatment, all subjects suppressed 0800 h cortisol below 1.8 micro g/dl (mean, 0.66 +/- 0.08 micro g/dl) during the 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST), whereas during troglitazone treatment none of the subjects suppressed 0800 h cortisol below 1.8 micro g/dl (mean, 9.0 +/- 1.8 micro g/dl). Serum dexamethasone levels decreased by 66 +/- 4%, and the erythromycin breath test measurements increased by 27 +/- 8%, indicating increased CYP3A4 activity during troglitazone treatment. The hydrocortisone suppression test (HST) was performed by administering 50 mg hydrocortisone at 2300 h. Using the criterion of suppression of 0800 h plasma corticosterone by more than 50%, the specificity of the HST was 100% both before and after troglitazone treatment. In conclusion, troglitazone induced the activity of CYP3A4 leading to falsely abnormal DST. HST is a useful alternative to the DST in patients taking medications that increase the activity of CYP3A4.